Take a look at the seven foot long wings on the F-104 Star Fighter with the wing tip tanks in place, you really wonder how such a thin wing can support that much weight.
I worked on the D models at Cannon in the 80's as a weapons tech. Most of the armaments shown in this vid is theoretically what it could carry. They never flew with 4 outermost pylons as that limited wing sweep. Only the 4 inside sweep. 111 never carried MERs, TERs, gunpods, or a lot of the other stuff. The only multiple ejection rack carried was the BRU3a which is the long black ones, and those were only carried on the sweeping pylons.
@acebrandon3522 The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Did operate these F111 Fighter bomber during the 80s to 90s and involved tge Last Military Campaign at Persian Gulf War 1991 Operation Desert Storm against Iraq 🇮🇶 forces
@Wongwanchungwongjumbo it was listed as a fighter/bomber and could carry the aim 9 and a gun in the weapons bay (D model only) but it never was used air to air. The mission of the 111 was fly fast and low to hit ground targets. It was also capable of carrying the B61 tactical nuke.
I liked how the F-111 pilots felt they needed to drop chaff while being shot at by direct-fire unguided munitions that were 30 years obsolete by the time the Aardvark entered service. ;)
Yes and Anti ship Missile along with Bombs and can take 2 Fighters to sink Enemy Battleship. The 1982 Falklands Islands War between Argentina 🇦🇷 against United Kingdom 🇬🇧 also one Argentine Etandard Fighter Attack Aircraft with 1 Exocet Anti ship Missile that struck Directly at British Royal Navy modern type 42 Destroyer HMS Sheffield and sank eventually Stern First.
Loved seeing the MO tail #. Mountain Home was my first permanent duty base as an avionics tech servicing the electronics on these beautiful birds! Watching them launch with full AB will forever be etched upon my mind. And my ears!
Well I'm not surprised HMS Hood died at the end, she was hit with well over the original. The Bismarck finally hit the Hood with the 5th salvo, with 1 direct hit with a 15 inch ( 1940 ish pound ) shell blowing up her magz. So being hit with 7,852kg of tnt, which is basically ALL 8 shells equivalent from Bismarck, that's lmao definitely gonna do it lol.
Bismarck got very, very lucky to sink Hood that way. Most likely the shell hit below the Hood's belt, which was too thick for Bismarck to penetrate at that range, in the trough of her wake.
Indeed, the Bismark wouldn't have looked much better herself if she was hit with a 15 inch. Plus Hood miss identifying the Prince Eugen as Bismarck, that's the only reason Bismarck was able to achieve 5 salvos. However it's hilarious how people seem to think Bismarck just turned up and with one shot kills HMS Hood 🤣, they would love to think so lol. @@Neneset
(Edgy joke incoming, brace yourselves) - - - - - - I don’t know how I feel about a Japanese UA-camr sinking the USS Arizona with 500lb bombs….again Jk dude, love the video!
Aviation will be like this somewhere, when Bismarck is added to the game, and the Gaijins do not separate the equipment by time before the Cold War and after.
Back in the late 80s, there was a ship that there were going to sink to make an artificial Reef off of Florida. They had a squadron of F-4s bomb the ship.. Well it was an embarrassment. The F-4s kept missing the ship. My father was in the Air Force at the time, his squad load the F-4s. We watch it live on TV on the local station. I remember him say, they keep missing... There was a few that hit the target, but kept going right thru the ship. They were practice bombs, 500 pound concrete bombs, but it was still and embarrassment.
The 111 never carried 48 500lb bombs ever, except for some publicity photos. The wings don’t shake like that. All 111A’s were converted to EF-111A’s. They usually operate at night, and would be F-111F’s with Pave Tack hauling laser guided stores coming in on the deck broadside to the ship. Me: USAF Vark chief for eight years.
The trick to using napalm on ships in actual matches, (I do this because its funny) Is to make sure you hit the front and back. She'll burn and burn and burn, just wiping out crew with ever tick of the server. Does not work on Full BBs unless they've already taken a bunch of hits, but BCs and down are highly susceptible to being covered in liquid fire. A1H with napalm against most ships is really rude, but that's why its funny!
I like how the ships start shooting at the plane because in those days I think the crew would be looking and thinking what the hell is that coming towards us and at speed no aircraft came close to. Apart from that good video. Found out in the 80’s when on exercise near RAF Lakenheath/ Mildenhall F111 didn’t like flares being fired near them, by the time police military and civilian got to the area we were long gone. Next time stick to or flight path for landing.
@@NonsenseFabricator No, but they decided to go with the vibrations and they do have wings and guiding surfaces failing due to stress on sharp turns fx…
Another thing that needs to be considered, these ships would be maneuvering hard, making them very difficult to hit with unguided weapons. Laser-guided bombs would be far more effective and would likely allow the Aardvark to stay above the AAA.
@@JoshuaTootell Doesn't take all that much maneuvering to avoid unguided bombs dropped from >20,000 feet. The Japanese were particularly good at this, which made level bombers like the B-17 and B-24 essentially useless against IJN warships.
The Bullpup can only carry 4 rounds and its power is limited(one shot of TNT is 50kg) and the Phantom and other aircraft of the same generation can also carry it to the same extent, so it didn't have enough impact to introduce it as a strength of the F-111. The bullpup vs battleship content is included in Kongo vs. Guided Weapons, which I posted in the past. If necessary, would it be better to include those weapons next time?
WT's damage modeling being wonky, weird and shit again. These are not armor piercing bombs, as such they should not be able to detonate ammo storage on BB's. They would cause mayhem on the superstructure and take out modules like fire control, secondaries and AA, but that would be it.
あの薄い翼がこんなに重量に耐えれるって驚き
なんかちょっとパカパカしてんのが不安
ときどき悲鳴をあげているかのようにプルプルしているのが可愛い。
Take a look at the seven foot long wings on the F-104 Star Fighter with the wing tip tanks in place, you really wonder how such a thin wing can support that much weight.
F111Aが1機でWW2時代の艦攻・艦爆の大編隊に相当する爆弾量だから、結構エグイ結果・・・。
やっぱジェットエンジンってエグい技術なんやなって
???「戦争は変わった」
羽根の可変部分に懸架された爆弾がつねに進行方向を向くという機能、子どものころ以来半世紀以上見たくて見れなかったことが今拝見できました。ありがとうございます。ご健康第1にご制作にお励みくださいませ。
比較的小型爆弾で戦艦を圧倒的な鉄量で覆いつくし、爆沈させる様は芸術的だなと思いました😊
😀
F-111 looks so incredible! I never knew that it could carry this much. And also the sheer variety!
It was the workhorse of the USAF during the 60's thru the 80's.... Incredible aircraft.
I worked on the D models at Cannon in the 80's as a weapons tech. Most of the armaments shown in this vid is theoretically what it could carry. They never flew with 4 outermost pylons as that limited wing sweep.
Only the 4 inside sweep. 111 never carried MERs, TERs, gunpods, or a lot of the other stuff. The only multiple ejection rack carried was the BRU3a which is the long black ones, and those were only carried on the sweeping pylons.
@acebrandon3522
Yes and is suitable as a Fighter Bomber Aircraft.
@acebrandon3522
The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Did operate these F111 Fighter bomber during the 80s to 90s and involved tge Last Military Campaign at Persian Gulf War 1991 Operation Desert Storm against Iraq 🇮🇶 forces
@Wongwanchungwongjumbo it was listed as a fighter/bomber and could carry the aim 9 and a gun in the weapons bay (D model only) but it never was used air to air. The mission of the 111 was fly fast and low to hit ground targets. It was also capable of carrying the B61 tactical nuke.
念のために言っておきますが、同じF-111は、弾薬庫が着弾点に最も近い場所を正確に狙って最新の対輸送誘導ミサイルを発射することができます。直撃すれば弾倉が爆発して船が沈没する恐れがある。
I liked how the F-111 pilots felt they needed to drop chaff while being shot at by direct-fire unguided munitions that were 30 years obsolete by the time the Aardvark entered service. ;)
It seems that the Aardvark pilot wants to tease the battleship with countermeasures.😎
To be fair, the -111 turned like a semi-truck…
Flares are a result of a game cowboy who doesn’t know squat about operations.
6:16実際にやったら甲板上のクルーだけでなく内部蒸し焼きにして全滅させられるし、消火とかダメコンで戦闘能力奪えるんだろうな
The first ship was hit with almost half its displacement in bombs. Hard to believe an aircraft can carry that much, half a battleship!
Tones =/= kg
@@hughdonnelly7183 Opps you are right! Totally misread the units.
@@awayforlongI initially made the same mistake. Its allright, and the carry weight is still incredible either way.
Yes and Anti ship Missile along with Bombs and can take 2 Fighters to sink Enemy Battleship.
The 1982 Falklands Islands War between Argentina 🇦🇷 against United Kingdom 🇬🇧 also one Argentine Etandard Fighter Attack Aircraft with 1 Exocet Anti ship Missile that struck Directly at British Royal Navy modern type 42 Destroyer HMS Sheffield and sank eventually Stern First.
翼可変機の高速時のキュッとなってるの、なんか可愛い
ナパームは、やっぱりクルクルしながら落下していくのが様式美。
Ｆ-111Aでは、たかが500ポンドでも、戦艦の時代の艦爆（アメリカでは艦攻）1機の急降下爆撃は500ポンド1発・・・・・。
50機の艦爆と同等・・・空母なら4隻ぐらいは必要。（艦爆特化でも護衛や直衛の艦戦は必要だから）
艦攻でも日本の艦攻なら、概ね2000ポンド1発。（800kg）
太平洋戦争時の米軍の艦爆であるドーントレスの搭載爆弾は1000ポンド爆弾じゃなかったでしたっけ？
で、後継機のヘルダイバーは2000ポンド爆弾を積めたし、F6FやF4Uなんかも2000ポンド爆弾を積めたかと。
Loved seeing the MO tail #. Mountain Home was my first permanent duty base as an avionics tech servicing the electronics on these beautiful birds! Watching them launch with full AB will forever be etched upon my mind. And my ears!
この弾数の「一斉着弾」の破壊力はエゲツないな〜😅
Who else finds the fact that the Aardvark uses a ejection CAPSULE cool?
Imagine being an AA gunner on the ship deck in 1944, and you see one plane and you thought, “Oh, no big deal.” and then 3:42 happens.
I can hear the confused, deafened screaming.
7:52
可変翼が後退しているのに、投下する瞬間に「定位置」に戻ってから投下される様子
それはそれとして、湾岸で鳴らした砂漠の破壊神様はやっぱり色々搭載量がおかしいですね…FとBを付け間違えただろうとからかわれるのも頷けます
F111はやり込みまくったGUNSHIPIIIの思い出...
I'm pretty sure WW2 anti-aircraft gun sights wouldn't be able to adjust for a plane going as fast as an F-111 would be.
500、750ポンド爆弾の凄まじい積載量に3000ポンドもあんなに積めるなんて恐ろしい！しかしそれらを一分かからずに装着する惑星妖精は一体何者〜
今の所惑星最大の搭載量で迫力のある爆弾投下で撮りがいがありましたね🐺流石に手練れの惑星妖精でもしんどそうな量です😅
4:56
ゼーゴックのR-1を思い出した
うぽつです( ﾟ 3ﾟ)7
凄まじい爆弾の量ですねこの飛行機。
大和実装されたらまた同じ事してほしい( ´ー`)
ありです。また映像動画上げたくなったので面白いのあればまとめて上げたいですね🐺
@@WT_Wolf やったーヽ(=ﾟωﾟ)人(ﾟωﾟ=)ﾉ
楽しみに待ってます(´∀｀)
8:44 なんてこった! フッドが沸騰しちまう!
I wonder how can you make a training room like this in War Thunder, will be appreciated if anyone figured it out
All of the shooting is done with friends in custom battles, but it might be difficult to do it alone without using user missions.
@@WT_Wolf i thought the ships in this video are bots, thanks for replying !
F111A [めっちゃ重い……ﾌﾞﾙﾌﾞﾙﾌﾞﾙﾌﾞﾙ]
橘花•景雲開発はこれを狙ってたんだろうかね
伊勢型に対して高速域からの投下で鈍器で殴ったようなにぶい音の後､若干遅れて爆発するの好き
Great video!!! Enjoyed seeing that you used so many.differnt types.of the F111 Weapons!!!
You should try this test again with the USS Alaska firing its 5-inch VT shells. Those shells are extremely effective against aircraft
ただ、実戦でのF-111は、左右外側2つのパイロンは使ってないはずなので、500ポンドのmk82爆弾なら24発が限界だと思う。
というかもっぱらバンカーバスターなどの大型レーザー誘導爆弾ばっかり使ってたからね
なるほど戦艦に居場所が無くなるわけだ。
戦艦が簡単に沈むか！
As an American I can confirm, that’s a lot of bombs
Amazing video! I liked the camera effect and the different ships and bomb types!
主翼がめっちゃぷるぷる震えてて（笑）。
Always love F111, Australia or RAAF use F111 for sea strikes which I seen carry 4 harpoons, even test bed for stand off weapons like LRASM.
わぁ…！凄まじい迫力…😮😮😮
戦艦の対空砲火 VS F111の機銃マシマシ掃射対決はワロタ！！
大勢が乗船しているの戦艦がヤラれる画はなんか切ない(-_-;)
高抗力爆弾(お尻にプロペラついてる奴)ってどんな時に使うんでしょうか？
低高度爆撃
爆発が近すぎて自爆しないために着弾まで時間がかかるようにしてる
ありがとうございまーす(^^)
低空から爆撃する場合、衝撃波や破片は自分よりも速く飛んで来るので、逃げるための時間稼ぎが必要です。
ギニアビサウ独立戦争ではポルトガルのG.91が信管の不備で巻き添え墜落しています。
hot damn dude, that first bit with the 500lb bombs, you be doing operation linebacker against a single battleship
Next f111 with gunpods Vs destroyers
Well I'm not surprised HMS Hood died at the end, she was hit with well over the original.
The Bismarck finally hit the Hood with the 5th salvo, with 1 direct hit with a 15 inch ( 1940 ish pound ) shell blowing up her magz.
So being hit with 7,852kg of tnt, which is basically ALL 8 shells equivalent from Bismarck, that's lmao definitely gonna do it lol.
Bismarck got very, very lucky to sink Hood that way. Most likely the shell hit below the Hood's belt, which was too thick for Bismarck to penetrate at that range, in the trough of her wake.
Indeed, the Bismark wouldn't have looked much better herself if she was hit with a 15 inch. Plus Hood miss identifying the Prince Eugen as Bismarck, that's the only reason Bismarck was able to achieve 5 salvos.
However it's hilarious how people seem to think Bismarck just turned up and with one shot kills HMS Hood 🤣, they would love to think so lol. @@Neneset
(Edgy joke incoming, brace yourselves)
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don’t know how I feel about a Japanese UA-camr sinking the USS Arizona with 500lb bombs….again
Jk dude, love the video!
開幕3秒でオメガした👍
Side shot with the new type torpedo would be nice.
【WarThunder】F-111A アードヴァーク vs 各国戦艦
Aviation will be like this somewhere, when Bismarck is added to the game, and the Gaijins do not separate the equipment by time before the Cold War and after.
投弾時にパイロンまで一緒に投げてる・・・ (´・ω・｀) F-111の外装パイロンってそういう物なのかな？
投弾するその時に捨てるかは微妙だけど、内側パイロンは後退角54度以上を使うなら接触するから全速で逃げるなら捨てる必要がある。外翼パイロンは角度変更できないから可変翼使用不能になる。冷戦が熱戦になった時は増槽を積んで目的地近くになったらパイロンごと捨てて高速侵入する想定だったらしい。（ソース不明）
@@user-bj1bk3ll5z 現実ならともかく、惑星ではデメリットがないので気前よく捨てる一択ですね。
@@user-bj1bk3ll5z
＞冷戦が熱戦になった時は増槽を積んで目的地近くになったらパイロンごと捨てて高速侵入する想定だったらしい。（ソース不明）
小説の「ロシアの核」（デイル・ブラウン、ハヤカワNV）にそういう描写がありましたね。捨ててしまえば重量・空気抵抗は問題にならない。
作者はF-111の元搭乗員なので、２・９番ハードポイントにも使いでは考えてあるという事だったのでしょう。
7:48 かっこいい
Back in the late 80s, there was a ship that there were going to sink to make an artificial Reef off of Florida. They had a squadron of F-4s bomb the ship.. Well it was an embarrassment. The F-4s kept missing the ship. My father was in the Air Force at the time, his squad load the F-4s. We watch it live on TV on the local station. I remember him say, they keep missing... There was a few that hit the target, but kept going right thru the ship. They were practice bombs, 500 pound concrete bombs, but it was still and embarrassment.
これは大和でもキツイ
ここまで数が恐ろしいと流石に500Ibsでもやべぇなぁ…
The Mighty IJN YAMATO Battleship may survive and eventually succumbed to the heavy damages and sink stern first.
次回はガングート級戦艦マラットかコムナをご利用ください。
バルカン砲で笑った
可変翼機の主翼プルプルはまだ治らんのか
Awesome video man, thanx for posting 👍👍
Very nice, can you do like the "top tier" of coastal boats too?
3:28 M61A1バルカン×5がいい。翼下に4しか見えないけど。せっかくだから翼下の全てのハードポイント使った×8が見たかった。これだけあればA-10のGAU-8に勝てるかな。どうかな。
コメント&ご視聴ありがとうございます。ガンポッド4基と内蔵バルカンが1基の計5基ですね。WTの仕様上外側パイロンにバルカンが載らないので動画内の5基が限界となります。
ウェポンベイに搭載するやつですね。5つ目の発砲炎も見えました。返信ありがとうございます。@@WT_Wolf
The 111 never carried 48 500lb bombs ever, except for some publicity photos. The wings don’t shake like that. All 111A’s were converted to EF-111A’s. They usually operate at night, and would be F-111F’s with Pave Tack hauling laser guided stores coming in on the deck broadside to the ship. Me: USAF Vark chief for eight years.
The trick to using napalm on ships in actual matches, (I do this because its funny) Is to make sure you hit the front and back. She'll burn and burn and burn, just wiping out crew with ever tick of the server. Does not work on Full BBs unless they've already taken a bunch of hits, but BCs and down are highly susceptible to being covered in liquid fire. A1H with napalm against most ships is really rude, but that's why its funny!
全部無誘導でしょ？
こんな綺麗に当てられるのすごい
I wish they would allow us to jettison the outer pylons on the vark
You should be able to
HMS Hood can't catch a break, ever. Magazine will explode no matter what game.
そもそもBRに差がありすg…おっと誰か来たようだ
I like how the ships start shooting at the plane because in those days I think the crew would be looking and thinking what the hell is that coming towards us and at speed no aircraft came close to. Apart from that good video. Found out in the 80’s when on exercise near RAF Lakenheath/ Mildenhall F111 didn’t like flares being fired near them, by the time police military and civilian got to the area we were long gone. Next time stick to or flight path for landing.
Yeah I’m not sure how I feel about this popping up on my recommended and watching this on December 7th… 😬
これには戦中爆撃機も真っ青だな
How long can an F-111A operate before the wings and wing sockets needs to be replaced due to metal-fatigue? It’s nerve wrecking how the wings vibrate…
War Thunder may not be strictly realistic :V
@@NonsenseFabricator No, but they decided to go with the vibrations and they do have wings and guiding surfaces failing due to stress on sharp turns fx…
4:10 で右翼の一部がもげたのは船からの攻撃によるものですか？
エスコンの戦艦もこれくらいやってようやく沈むようになって欲しいな
Another thing that needs to be considered, these ships would be maneuvering hard, making them very difficult to hit with unguided weapons. Laser-guided bombs would be far more effective and would likely allow the Aardvark to stay above the AAA.
Also, the Vark would be coming in low, at night. The ships would never know what killed them.
A battleship isn't that maneuverable
@@Gromit801 Why? The Vark can most likely fly above the AAA, making them untouchable, so why bother flying in at low altitude?
@@JoshuaTootell Doesn't take all that much maneuvering to avoid unguided bombs dropped from >20,000 feet. The Japanese were particularly good at this, which made level bombers like the B-17 and B-24 essentially useless against IJN warships.
There’s no “ammunition depot” on a warship. They’re called “magazines.” 🙂
Do the bulpup guided missiles do anything?
The Bullpup can only carry 4 rounds and its power is limited(one shot of TNT is 50kg) and the Phantom and other aircraft of the same generation can also carry it to the same extent, so it didn't have enough impact to introduce it as a strength of the F-111. The bullpup vs battleship content is included in Kongo vs. Guided Weapons, which I posted in the past. If necessary, would it be better to include those weapons next time?
@@WT_Wolf Understood. Thanks for the prompt response!😎👍
Great Video, but it is not the "ammo depot' it is called "the magazine" and usually a specific name such as forward port, number 3 etc.
The video subtitle "depot" has been changed to "magazine". Thanking for pointing that out.
翼がプルプルしてるの可愛い
結論
絨毯爆撃は最強
在来式爆弾数発で熟練した数千人の水兵と数億円の軍艦を古鉄にすることができるので
戦艦ってかっこいとは思うんだが現代戦にはなくなるものも当然や
Ah the pig. Still one of the best long range strike aircraft ever developed
主翼がプルプル震えている。
Hood detonated, a hatch must have been left open
戦艦大和でも 多数の750ポンド爆撃を受けたらお終いね
基本艦橋には装甲が無いに等しいですからね 実際戦艦武蔵は50ポンド爆弾1発で艦橋が無効化してマスカラ
いつかこの戦艦達もB1、2の餌食になるんやろな…(・ω・｀)
ｷﾀ━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━!!
1:23 これみたいに一斉投下ってどうやるん？
副兵装を選択して副兵装の発射数を設定
it would never take that many hits to put down a ship!
very satisfying to watch
Wonderful video game 👍
バルカンやロケット弾はウケる。
ナパームは装甲があっても乗員が蒸焼きにならないのかな？
別世界の話になりますが昔の怪獣映画(バルゴン ギャオス ギララ ガッパ)ではF-104がサイドワインダーを撃っていました(笑)
恐らく今でも(素人あるあるだけど)戦闘機(攻撃機)が爆撃するなんて想像もしない人いると思う。
f111の機首がB1に似てて好き
こんど徹甲爆弾の比較テストしてほしいです
Song at 6:19 ?
This is the WarThunder song "Fatherland". I added it to the summary section.
@@WT_Wolf Thanks 👍 and keep making these videos, I'm enjoying it
………えげつなッッッ‼‼
機首上げしたら簡単に両翼もげそう(笑)
How do you set up a 1 vs 1 in WT? I haven't been able to figure it out.
Just set the maximum number of players to 2 in a custom battle.
WT's damage modeling being wonky, weird and shit again. These are not armor piercing bombs, as such they should not be able to detonate ammo storage on BB's. They would cause mayhem on the superstructure and take out modules like fire control, secondaries and AA, but that would be it.
nice camera work
How do you drop multiple bombs at once? It always tells me the active weapon selector is blocking salvo
You should be able to set the drop settings all at once and drop at the same time.
750lb M117 Cone 45 Bomb x 38, 9:05 (the bombs make a… questionable shape…)
伊勢は沈めないでほしかった😢