Speaker Lindsay Hoyle takes aim at Suella Braverman for breaking House of Commons rules
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 бер 2023
- Don't get on the wrong side of Lindsay.
Follow us on Tik Tok:
www.tiktok.com/@politicsjoe?l...
Follow our Instagram:
/ politicsjoe
Follow PoliticsJOE on Twitter:
/ politicsjoe_uk
Subscribe for more videos:
ua-cam.com/users/PoliticsJOE?s...
Want more from JOE? See our other channel:
/ joecoukvideos
How the country put up with these parasites is beyond me
Hoyle being one of them. He's the worst leader of the house EVER.
@@jake751 Dude seems scared of his own shadow, Bercow kicked ass.
he had his own agenda as well.
Brexit voters sadly
Because we live in an elected dictatorship.
Barrister Suella Braverman demonstrates her deep understanding of the law once again.
Maybe she was a Barrista.
She was a very average barrister, everyone knows. She was good at photocopying though. Google how she said she was involved in things when she wasn’t.
‘’Suella Braverman has been asked to clarify her academic bona fides after a barrister rubbished the claim that she contributed to his legal textbook.
Braverman’s profile on the website of No5 Chambers, where she worked before becoming an MP, claimed that she "is a contributor to" the 2007 bestseller, Gambling for Local Authorities, Licensing, Planning and Regeneration.
But Philip Kolvin KC, the book's author, told the Big Issue and confirmed to RollOnFriday that Braverman "did not make a written or editorial contribution to the book".
The extent of her involvement was menial, indicated Kolvin, who said that "on one occasion I asked her to do some photocopying for the book, which she did".
@@brendawilliams1687 I wouldn't even trust her to make my coffee
If she was any good at it she wouldn't have gone into politics, obviously.
@@garyt.8745 she will make even more money rinsing the taxpayer for the tories tho.
Inside the head of a tory... 'I have no intention of answering a question directly, but what I shall do is deflect with another item in order to assert blame at someone else other than us tories.'
The whole of the UK apart from the rich are sick of the tories
Yes, and apart from a few well off Gary Lineker types. Most of us are sick of economic migrants.
@@alien4422 What makes you sick of that? I've seen no evidence that it's a substantial threat to the UK either culturally or economically compared to much larger social and financial issues over the last 10-15 year.
@@alien4422 Gary Linekar earned his money. I have no problem withj that....seems you do.
Not true. Plenty of working class people let themselves get fooled by right-wing Tory ideology and vote against their own interests.
@@alien4422 "Most of us" .. spare us the populist bollocks.
I didn't think it possible to find a Home Secretary worse than Patel but once again, the Tories manage to exceed my expectations!
Working class communities need more and more and more and more Albanians.
@@evolassunglasses4673
Typically dishonest comment.
And my too 🤭🤭🤭🤭
@@dondoodat 🤡
@@evolassunglasses4673 Give us those numbers of Albanians coming in there, would ya?
*THATS REALLY BAD ACTUALLY* she is prejudicing an ongoing case
@@georgewarner5496 NO cos you are a rando w4nker on the internet of no importance to anyone.
@@georgewarner5496 are you bound by Parliamentary rules?
@@matthewfoley3929
Do you understand parliamentary rules?
@George Warner Funnily enough, despite what you may think, 'George from UA-cam' doesn't have the same position of power and influence as an acting Home Secretary of the United Kingdom.
@@georgewarner5496 chap. 4 sec. 190 of Parliamentary rules. Read it and learn. And for full disclosure I knew it existed but I had to look up the actual section..
Why did Braverman ask Labour to apologise when it was she who said the name?
She was asking labour to apologise in her original statement, she wanted them to apologise for stopping them illegally deporting someone who allegedly murdered someone in the uk after the failed deportation
@@daniwalmsley611 Thanks for the explanation.
@@daniwalmsley611 fails to mention her own tory mp’s who also blocked it under human rights issues… dreadful selecting of the facts as usual from Braverman.
@@daniwalmsley611 he did so she did
.not have to apologise it was fact
@@kevingreen1305 she's not allowed to mention it as the case has been appealed. Doing so could prejudice the outcome. As home secretary she should have been well aware of that, so it was either extremely careless or simply shows she has no respect for where she is or the position she is in.
"Home Secretary should know better", says Mr Speaker. What he means, but is not permitted to declare is: "A bare-faced Liar with as little knowledge of Decency, as she has of the Truth". Her predecessors, be they fellow-Tories or Labour, must be turning in their graves. How could Sunak have re-appointed her?
Integrity in shreds...
What he means is that a trained KC would know better.
She was given hers as an honorary title because she didn't get it by merit.
She does know better.
@@daveclarke6481 indeed and therefore we should be reviewing why she hasn't been disbarred for such fragrant breaches of the law
How very true.😊👍
Excellent. She's made it easier for him to be let off. Once again demonstrating she is outrageously incompetent.
Braverman flaunting her ignorance and disregard of the law once again.
It's almost like she doesn't care about anything but blaming and gaslighting other people.
Odd that her family didn't choose Rwanda as their destination of choicewhen they emigrated from Kenya....since she seems to think it some kind of paradise.
She raised a good point though, Labour actively want terrorists in the UK, Labour are responsible for many deaths across the UK especially with their lousy policies towards knife crime. Embarrassing party.
@@puddyvalentine
A paradise that's also a punishment and a deterrent, apparently.
Nevermind, at least we'll be getting some Rwandans coming to the UK as part of the deal.
It's almost like she knows nothing about the law. Given her leagal skills & knowledge, plus that of Rabb, I really must get myself off down to the 30 minute law degree college in order that I can set up my practice next week. Fancy a career change 🤔
@@puddyvalentine Especially when one considers that Rwanda shares French as lingua franca with Mauritius, her mother's country of birth. (More than can be said for the Afghans, Eritreans, Yemenis, etc. she's wanting to ship off to Kigali.)
She is supposedly a KC which means she is part of the elite group of the smartest and most intelligent barristers at the top of their profession. Could have fooled me…
She didn't earn it. I believe the title is automatically given to an Attorney General whether they previously earned it or not - her case.
Wow, that's damning for the barristers.
@@TheRB888 Same as Raab before her
She was only made a QC/KC when she became Attorney General. Up to that point and when she first became an MP her practice experience as a barrister was a mere few years.
How did she remain as a lawyer?! It's staggering
STARMER WIS ONE , whit dis he look like wae that wig on when he wis yunger a brainless twit in a wig.
@MadManRob he was head of CPS
@@MadManRobStarmer was one of the best lawyers in England, Rob. Was a key figure in heaps of important cases. Braverman is just a social climber with very little pedigree.
If you have ever been on trial then you would know! The BEST lying piece of dirt is Keir Starmer, his job was to get GUILTY terrorists and paedophiles off. How do you think he managed to do that?
@MadManRob Starmer was a ferocious lawyer, he headed up the CPS for a reason, it is why nobody on the Tory side bring up his record much or go after him on it, as they know it will blow up in their face. The people who complain about grooming gangs should love Starmer, it was him as head of the CPS that created a specialised task force within CPS to deal with prosecuting those offenders and help the girls affected by it, he it brought in a world leading specialised lawyer to lead that team.
In contrast Raab and Braverman are well known to be terrible Lawyers, part of why they act the way they do in government is to take out their frustrations on the legal profession they both think unfairly scorned them.
Braverman being the worst, she is/was part of a Buddhist cult whose leader died accused of multiple sexual harassment cases against boys, she has a pathological hatred of human rights courts and thinks all judicial oversight should be run through elected ministers, not independent courts. She is a horror of a women and a stain on this country that Rishi Sunak is too weak to control.
This government deliberately left out the ECHR in their Brexit manifesto to gain the authority to abuse the public for political gains! What authority grants public resources to terrorise my rights without due process!?
Thankfully because it's not in the manifesto the labour majority lords will hopefully slap it down.
That was cameron's game all along. He complained about ECHR in 2007, wanted it to be replaced with a UK bill of rights in 2015. Put up the brexit vote, and would have then claimed that although people voted against brexit, there is wide spread support for his bill of rights. But the things changed. ECHR is not part of brexit, because it already existed since 1950.
@@lonelyone69 The Lords cannot deny its right through the House they can send it back twice only, if it comes back the third time with a government majority they must let it pass through as far as i am aware.
@@pistoleer3572 yes but the bill cannot be brought up until a new session of parliament. So it takes a maximum of 3 sessions of parliament for the bill to pass. If the policy was in their manifesto then the government could force the bill through after only one session.
Nest of vipers all of them
It’s time for the Bar Council to bring Braverman before the disciplinary committee for bringing the legal profession into disrepute.
Braverman such a good lawyer that she doesn't understand Sub judice 🤣
You know for a home sec and former barrister she’s knows embarrassingly little about law.
Could it be that she was unaware that the case had been appealed?.
@@ElCampiador She's the Home Secretary and it's a high-profile case. If she doesn't know it's under appeal then we should question her competence.
@@ElCampiador it's possible I suppose but that would underline, again, the staggering ineptitude of this government. She is reading a pre-prepared written answer to a question of which she had prior written notice. Surely someone thought to check their facts first!!!?
At last but in all honesty, Hoyle should just have her removed from the House permanently by the sergeant at arms.
And deported her to Rwanda
Hoyle , a complete stuttering fool . Ideal for the job ..
@Petyr Kowalski why Rwanda?? Why not to where it is least accessible??
Preferably Antarctica.
Now the Home Sec has prejudiced his case, he is sure to win his appeal
Certainly helped. But you see, she doesn't care, because that will give her yet another dog whistle about lefty judges or something.
Which was possibly her objective.
"If Labour MPs had just ignored the illegal bill then this wouldn't have happened..."
@@derges It’s absurd, isn’t it? How dare political representatives of the people or the independent judiciary prevent us from breaking the laws which we push through?
@@georgiameadows That sounds to me like a good argument. I wonder if there are any precendents?
“I look forward to an apology” - you and the rest of the country Mr Speaker.
about time Mr Speaker became a Speaker BY up holding Constitution LAWS .
That was an apology, Suella Braverman style, also comes under the heading of most Tories
Suella Braverman should have law degrees withdrawn for such an elementary mistake because this issue of not knowing what is sub judice is damming in terms of intellect and academic ability.
Her KC is honorary, she didn't earn it.
@@dondoodat ...and it should be withdrawn if she still has it.
Pathetic cancel culture comment. Get a life
This just goes to prove how useless the Rwanda scheme is. She went there only a few days ago yet is now back in the UK!
How on earth,Braveman parents can look into the mirror and say we are proud if our daughter,she has absolutely no shame or decency.
Frankly he should start chucking them out of the sessions. How many god damn times do I need to see videos of the Speaker calling out Tories for flouting rules in parliament with bugger all consequence beyond 'oh i'm sorry (now i've made my point on video)'
the tories don't give a monkeys anymore
By not apologising for her own failures we see the realities of @SuellaBraverman flaws. Having one prepared slap down line isn't enough & after being informed to retract that statement she fails to show competency & compassion. Let's hope she gets called in to the Chambers when the case is up in court. #PayNHS15 #GTTO
An apology from a Tory? Don't hold your breath!
Oh I don't know. "I am sorry that you have taken offence (snowflake!, implied)" is the usual style HMG apology.
Scapegoat assilum seekers to distract from their incompetence. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💥❤️
Cruella puke
Suella there, Auditioning to join GB news after the next election lol
Or indeed the BBC now. GB News presenters inexplicably get interviews on the BBC with zero pushback. They may as well be the same entity.
They are both as bad as each other bbc and GB
Probably the only place that will employ her after this.
Why wait, enough other standing Tory MP's have been given slots.
Ime surprised she isn't on the comedy channel GB news they seem to have half the tory party on there now even an Oswald Mosely copycat begins with N
A bit like being kicked with carpet slippers, but fun to watch never the less.
Braverman is quite a piece of work. A qualified lawyer who doesn't understand the law or flouts it for her populistic brand of fascism.
Not even qualified. Only honorary for the fact she was appointed AG.
@@SimplySketchyGT seems feasible. Doubted that a qualified lawyer could be so vacuous.
Fascism?oh dear,what a stupid comment
The fascists of the future will call themselves anti fascists
@@netcurtains quote - Fascism is generally defined as a political movement that embraces far-right nationalism and the forceful suppression of any opposition, all overseen by an authoritarian government. Fascists strongly oppose Marxism, liberalism and democracy, and believe the state takes precedence over individual interests.
Suppressing opposition - voter ID and redrawn boundaries
Opposition to Marxism - self evident in what they regularly say, particularly when referring to BLM
Opposition to Liberalism - ‘lefty lawyer’ spouted left right and centre
Opposition to democracy - unlawful Prorogation of Parliament, repressive legislation such as the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts act, Nationality and Borders act, systematic assaults on trade unions, etc
Sums them up pretty well, but happy to hear your opposing argument on why they’re not…
The country is waiting for her to stand down and for breaking the rules, while in office, even better leave stand down as Mp
Anyone else would be looking at up to two years in prison for that... Not a corrupt Tory though huh?
Probably covered under Parliamentary Privilege. You can't be held criminally liable for things you say in the chamber.
As if this harpy can experience shame enough to feel the need to apologise for anything
That's the "Party of Law and Order." Pitiful.
'Father Jack' Hoyle is awake, and can't believe he's hearing the philosophy of Enoch Powell being spouted by Braverman.
'philosophy'? That would imply that Enoch Powell managed to string two thoughts together
Nah Father Jack would be better than this guy, Father Jack had a spine.
@@helphelpimbeingrepressed9347 Which is more than can be said for the Cabinet.
He's still daydreaming of his peerage, rather than actually doing his job
@@66PHILB I would heartily accept extreme alchoholism over moral depravity
Astonishing a home secretary who flouts the law - she must know she has now predudiced an appeal case
"Don't get on the wrong side of Lindsay." Why whats he going to do? send you off to make a cup of tea? Far too often far too ineffective.
" I look forward to an apology...."
You're not the only one, pal. !
The whole Government need to apologise to the whole country for what they have done. Some compensation wouldn't go amiss either.
"committing to rolling out safe and legal routes". These should already exist. Meanwhile you will continue to blame these people for taking whatever route they can take to seek refuge here.
Which they already said would only happen if boats stop coming. So, like, not at all.
Apparently to be rolled out after stopping the boats.
So if
A) the boats don't stop, no safe routes rollout.
B) if the boats stop, quietly drop the safe routes rollout. As there will no longer be a pressing need to do so, as it will not be suggested as a way to stop the boats.
Home Office Scandals"
How you voted for these people is quite unfathomable. You are a true patriot ..... Love , hugs n kisses ..
Typical Tory always blaming the opposite party!
She raised a good point though, you can’t argue against it. Labour literally campaigned to keep terrorists in the UK. That is unforgivable.
She did put her name forward a man is now dead.
@@alan4291 please explain
It's been 13 years, no excuses, get lost already!!
and who to replace them because labour started this mess
So ridiculous, the constant equations braverman makes between asylum seekers and criminals. Absolutely disgusting blatant xenophobia
She is right. Asylum seekers are dangerous
Criminals because they enter the UK illegally. They should apply for asylum in the first safe country, which is generally the one they came from in the case of Albania, which is a safe country.
@@samleboeuf6993 is that an attempt at humour? I should inform you it's failed.
@@samleboeuf6993 no they're not. Some may be. Some people in shops are shoplifters. So what?
I think shes spot on
Absolutely disgusting from bravermann... the attack of the mp and bringing up a case being appealed.. how is she our Home Secretary...
*"Hell"* and *"Freeze"* comes to mind. Good luck getting an apology from Braverman.
Why should she apologise for telling the truth
@@twistedsister2568 the legal term used was *_sub judice,_* truth is irrelevant in this case.
Let's just recall when Denis Skinner refused to withdraw calling David Cameron 'Dodgy Dave', John Bercow gave him his marching orders. Braverman - an unapposite name if ever there was one! - has called refugees far worse than that! yet, somehow, she has remained unscathed, unmarched, and still Karening, riding at the top of her sins, and still mouthing off when she should bave been called to book months ago. Hoyle has sat there, like a fossilized twig, saying nowt about all this perlocutionary speech. Bercow may well have said, "Get thee hence from my sight!" With Hoyle? Sweet FA!
Fossilised twig 😂😂😂😂😂 comedy gold
She is just pure pond life!!
Not at all that pure. Pure SCUM is more like the truth.
It's about time Hoyle grew a pair.
Or is put out to pasture to let some with a bit of authority and presence to do the job.
When is this nightmare going to end...only another 18 months.I AM SICK OF THIS GOVERMENT.
I cannot wait. 😊👍
He’ll be waiting a long time before anyone on the Conservative front bench will be making any kind of apology to the house as he has deemed the office he holds constantly
Well done Suella!! Stick to your guns! This bill needs to go through!
SHE DOES IT DELIBERATELY.
HAS TO KEEP UP THE TORY FACADE THAT THEY ARE DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY WHEN IN FACT IT,S JUST GRANDSTANDING LIKE PATEL TO THE TORY RIGHT WING.
IT,S ALL AN ACT.
Patel is probably glad that it's Stella's turn to do the right wing bonkers parliamentary performances.
You might be correct, she may be grandstanding to appeal to the right. Or it could be that the conservatives have now lurched more to the right. Many party’s drift to the fringes of politics when they have run out of ideas. But there is nothing the conservatives can do to prevent their downfall. A sinking ship will not stop sinking, it will never float again, it will just continue to sink.
1930s language.
1930s action.
This law would have stopped Jewish people fleeing Nazi occupied European countries.
Why are the Tories creating laws that would have killed Jewish people fleeing in the 1930s, and criminalising any that would have reached Britain?
Because even in the 30s we stopped them coming....the kindertransport, those kids site would have loved their parents to have been allowed to come.
Pathetic uneducated comment
@@verystripeyzebra exactly. "We will take only the children. The Mums and Dads are not welcome. They must be left behind to the gas chambers. And we will only take up to 15,000 children. No, 10,000. That is enough."
Literally the government plan in Britain in 1938-1939.
They actually chose to limit the number of children and knew their parents would killed, devastating the children. And they passed it into law.
Neville Chamberlain, Conservative Party - the Tories made it law then as they do now.
Demanding an apology, his ultimate power.
OK Komrade. "I look forward to an apology" that didn't sound like a demand to me....
@@tysay8170 we have different interpretations of the verb "to demand", I don't really care about yours.
Calling out her bullsht is a start .... Good job, Speaker.
@@runklestiltskin_2407 I am happy to educate a Russian, non native English speaker. 🤣
@@runklestiltskin_2407 he has several options, right up to locking them in the cell under Big Ben, and then he has the option to refer them to the Courts.
Good the speaker showing his teeth!! Better late than never!!
Why did her constituents vote for her?
The house seems a lot busier than when Andrew Bridgen spoke there last week.
Great to see a comment like this on such an awful channel. We will not forget.
@@RobinoftheHod the so called Left back big Phama narratives.
@@RobinoftheHod everyone responsible for *the message* will be legally held accountable.
@@stumble_leiner By whom, and in what forum?
@@nigelsynnott7344 these things happen organically
Never mind apologies, why not expel them from the House like he did for Ian Blackford, for calling Boris a (now proven) liar?
Because he didn't resend the comments attacking another member of the house.... The same way if a member is named by anyone in the house. Fun fact that tradition comes from pre reformation and was designed to hide the identity of MPs from common folk while also allowing common folk to understand who their MP was by the name of their constituency.
The gammons will be rubbing their knees with joy at braverman's response to Hoyle's intervention... The video ends with the emphasis that 'She Shut Him Up!'.
A worry when you pine for the days of John Bercow
There is no such thing a legal migrant routes..
She doesn’t deserve the title barrister.
Shows that the so called home secretary who is supposed to be a trained lawyer doesn't have a clue!
Staggering that a person of such low calibre can become a barrister. I've known one or two, and they've been top notch!! Very impressive as people and very knowledgeable. There's not even a glimmer of intelligence in Braverman, and nothing to suggests that she understands anything about the levels of dignity and integrity required in a holder of one of the four great offices of state. Her language and demeanour are astonishingly below par. As you can probably tell, I never cease to be shocked by the appallingness of this MP, and I am quite bewildered that there was no one left on the Tory benches better fitted for the post of HS.
What safe routes are they opening, I noticed she said it quietly and quite breathlessly, meaning she either doesn't want people to know or she knows she was l ying in parliament. Which means a comittee hearing can be put in place.
not only that but she was tripping over her words as she sped up her speech and attempted to move on to another thread faster than the speed of light.
No doubt Keir Starmer will jump on that in prime ministers evasions on Wednesday.
Brilliant video
Lets club together and invite all MPs to a big party...over a sink hole.
My goodness, with this lot, the UK is sinking further!
At last the Speaker develops a backbone. Took him long enough
Does she ever answer Qs? Or apologise?
nope, she's a lowlife, like the clown, the bully, Patel, invisible rishi etc
The literal meaning of ‘Tory’ is pirate or brigand. If they referred to themselves as ‘the thieves’, it would mean the same.
Sir Linseed oil finally grew a pair of seeds !
isn't braverman a kc?!
Yes. And none of her initiatives, zero, have legal pragmatism built in. They did not even try to understand if the Home Office can win any possible cases that are surely going to be brought against it if/when her proposals become law. Given that she did argue and win cases as a lawyer, this means that her proposals were not designed for the purposes they are supposed to have, but something else.
She was given her KC as an honorary title because she didn't have it when she became Attorney General.
She's definitely a C.
@@adamcole4623 An FC surely?
Worked at kfc, yes ... why do you ask?
It's so hilarious to see Cruella be forced to apologize to the speaker. It's like a bully being forced by the parent to apologize.
Given the numerous committees over bullying in the cabinet it won't be surprising that she's collected quite a lot of complaints...
I find it funny all tories do is blame attack avoid and exploit with a coward secretary
Bercow wouldn’t put up her, either, but she would accuse him of being abusive.
Appologise to the Nation it's literally amazing how Much Braverman has turned in to Donald Trump
How terrible 😄lame comparison
@@netcurtains Is it?
Always blame others
Never answer an accusation or even a question honestly
Immediately go on the counter-attack
Seems like a close comparison to me. Only she wasn't taught this by Roy Cohn.
I like em both whatever ,
@@andrasszabo1570 Isn't that Boris Johnson's MO?
ENGLAND you need to sort out your ruling parliament..!!
Very dangerous language for the Home Secretary to be using. Especially when that sort of language ends up putting MP’s at risks of being attacked. I mean come on, we’ve had 2 MP’s murdered within the last decade because of this very language.
When will the likes of Braverman realise this?
_"The House has resolved that no matter awaiting adjudication by a court of law... i.e. matters sub judice - should be brought before it."_ Erskine May - the 'Bible' of UK Parliamentary procedure.
And she pretends to be a lawyer and a parliamentarian!
(Her pretending to be a human being is a different issue.)
Sadist? Narcissist? WTF is it?!
That nice lady does not need to apologize to anyone. The home secretarys mobile device should be one of the most protected things on the planet. And sitting behind the current PM smiling whilst the rest of the world is suffering.😔
TRUTH IS TRUTH END OF!!!
You did liked there"food & weather'& you back
You are one that should apologise to the nation!!😡😡
this Goverment just sh!t slings can we please have a new one? this one is broken.
A former Attorney General didn’t know that. Good God.
Braverman sneakily sticking in the boot at the end.
She really is a 'thing' ...😢
As usual facts don’t matter to her.
Cruella Blabbeermouth comes out with some whoppers
Given that Suella Braverman and Rishi Sunak are both descendants of immigrants I would have hoped that they would be more sympathetic on the matter of immigration.
@MadManRob People come here illegally, because the legal routes are completely fucked, and if someone needs to leave there home country quickly, they are screwed.
We need an Australian Points based system and easier ways for migrants to come in, with proper inspection of course, this is a process that should take a few month, not years.
@MadManRob a holiday is different than wanting to live and work here.
@MadManRob Nope- that does not follow.
@MadManRob no no, they have, but those fleeing country's that could do them harm have the difficult task of needing a quick exit, many of which don't plan for or can't due to the time constraint, the way our legal migration system works does not really support those people.
Hence the boats, trucks, lorries, and other methods of entry into this country being used
If this government think "stopping the boats" will help they need a reality check.
@MadManRob No - your logic doesn't follow.
How do the millions in the country not see this complete disregard for the law and human decency.
She's constantly comparing immigrants to criminals yet you say something they all jump to get defence.
If she or anyone is breached the rules or holds the parliament in contempt, there’s rules that will see them dismissed permanently from parliament. Grow a pair and start applying the rules or are they above and beyond the rule of law.
It has become Abundantly clear that the Level of Incompetence displayed by the Home Secretary on a daily basis is helping the Labour Party to increase their lead over the Tories in opinion polls, keep it up Suella , you are doing a Great Job.
Lets just hope the damage she causes before the general election isn't too disastrous
Cruella talking about people needing to apologize - you brits do absurd humor so smeggin' well!
Kudos to the speaker for cutting the BS short!
A rarity for him to show backbone.