After the defendants attorney starts off with, "What we have here" my reaction was "a failure to communicate " when you said it right after that I nearly fell out of my chair laughing!😂
Ditto did quite a few clicks on the FF button and was doing something else with this as backround ..the prosecutions questions for the witness went in circles for an hour …
I wish future lawyers had to watch these kinds of trials. Then they wouldn’t be as nervous as I was when I thought trial was supposed to look like LA Law…
@@sydneysomer9958 court is where the trial is (that was supposed to be a play on "home is where the heart is" but obviously it doesn't rhyme with that or anything so it just reads like a regular statement)
I watched that entire trial when it happened and I had no clue about sov cits. I thought he was just being ridiculous. Now that I know I have even more respect for the judge not actually losing her crap on him every time he spewed his BS.
I listen to LTWM videos on my daily commute. I’m on my third day and still here. 🤣 No way I’m leaving now. I’ve stuck with it this far with the Defense attorney 😱
The comment about the defense attorney being post-stroke, makes absolute sense! I have a nursing background and have seen this in Neurology Units quite often.
Imagine the defense attorney in a big 6 week trial, something like Depp vs. Heard or The State vs. Darrell Brooks!! Id find not guilty just to get her to STFU!!!
In an altercation, it’s better to lose the physical fight rather than to strike first. That puts you in a lot stronger position than you responding to a threatened strike.
I would be terribly afraid having her represent me at trial. I would be afraid that jurors would drift off, more than normal, and miss an important point.
I agree with the jury. I default to "innocent until proven guilty" and the city did not prove guilt. I maintain a lot of doubt. Especially after the one guy testified that the security guard was being aggressive, and the security guard was not very credible at all. That alone, gives me reasonable doubts.
I agree. Good thing there was the witness that thought he was the best evidence state had. Lol I think he was the one that got the not guilty verdict. If the security guard wouldn't have reached several times for the phone it would have been guilty. I don't believe just because security gets a paycheck they can take things from others there. If someone is rattling keys and it's annoying they can't just snatch them out of your hands. They can ask you to leave, block you and call police. Was the "journalist " a jerk, annoying and looking for an argument yes I believe so.
Yeah it sounds like Mike knows this guy from something else (called him a 'knuckle-dragger') and that's clouding his judgment. Or he's saying it to drive engagement b/c it's mind-boggling to say this is a guilty verdict.
I thought there was drama at the very beginning of the trial about the position of the podium. The judge told them it wouldn't be moved, when she got her turn to address the court I noticed it was moved?
My immediate reaction as well. I can’t believe she passed a bar exam, not only based on incompetence, but she would still be filling out her identification info when the time was up.
A major problem with the video is that the fraudirors manipulate viewers’ impressions by calling out protests to actions the innocent LEO’s aren’t doing (stop hitting me, when an observer (like mom) can’t see what’s going on between the parties. They play with the zoom to manipulate how close someone seems to be them, I’ve seen that on several of their videos where they were called out. They edit events so that critical elements are seamlessly deleted. And their self-righteous insistence that they have the right to do what they’re doing is completely lawful, when it’s not colors perception to those either not familiar with the law or the behavior of these thugs. They’re also masters of what used to be called splitting but is now referred to as triangulation. They’re nasty to an extreme to one party and butter wouldn’t melt, etc., to another, then play the one they’ve been flattering against the other. When you see them in action they’re unable to utter a sentence without vulgarities and incessant demeaning comments. Currently they’re under the misconception that public employees, especially LEO, have to accept whatever abuse they dish out, no matter how horrific, including Glenn Cerio’s extremely racist rant against an AA officer who maintained a grace and dignity as very few of us could have maintained. (And for which reason, Cerio should be grateful his ugly head is still attached.) Both the SovC-its and the Frauditors are malignant narcissists, and use the same tactics. The way I keep myself from reacting as I think they deserve is to realize that narcissists are predators who are emerging in growing numbers, thanks to our consumerist-based economic systems reinforcing their behavior. Ultimately they’ll either cull or be culled from our excessive populations…hopefully while the planet will still be salvageable. Sorry. It’s the pain meds I’m on, along with realizing just how much this inane vs. insane (my favorite case law decision) will spur on these pos. There are ways to cut this all short but the unfettered aggression persons like Farley are getting away with -and actually making money on from a lunatic following-seems to be tapping into a truly dangerous trend right now.
@@katecoe8322agreed. Seems that at the very least, a caveat should be given before the video exhibits are shown to the jury, detailing a complete listing of edits to the raw video that were made by the defendant or on behalf of the defendant. It doesn’t solve for the false cries for effect, but at the least, informs the jury that they are viewing the aspects of the interaction the defendant deemed important.
Witnesses need to slow down. Wait to see if there is an objection. If not, think if this is actually a clear question and say "can you rephrase that" if it isn't.
The security guard was a terrible witness for the state and lost the case. He admitted he had not been in the area that you cannot record and he grabbed at the phone which both were against policy. It sickens me because even my 12 year old said this defendant is a DB.
It sickens you? The 1st amendment allows you to record anywhere in public, including inside publically accessible areas in public buildings. There's no expectation of privacy in public.... if you grabbed that security guards phone and he beat you up, you'd be charged with assault.... why do you think that is. You can't grab people or their property, and people have the right to defend themselves
@rhinotools1143 yes it sickens me. Unfortunately it is not against the law to be an a-hole. When my 12 year old autistic boy recognizes the guy is a DB that should tell you something.
@@robertjandorf8125 yup it is sickening. In the country I live in it IS illegal to be an asshole, at least being a verbal asshole is punishable by law. Any insult can get you a fine. It is even kinda like a felony, you will have that charge and conviction in your criminal record. Even if you insult somebody indirectly you brake the law, for example if you say: "It's not my opinion, but my buddy would say that you are an asshole!" The person you indirectly insulted can press charges and the fines are between 200-2000$ and in repeating heavy cases you can get prison time for up to a year. although that is extremely rare. The reason this is illegal is: The human dignity shall not be violated. Don't know if I translated it right, but it is the very first Sentence of our laws. Although we have freedom of speech, you are not allowed to degrade/violate a humans dignity. It is a little bit sad, that it isn't prosecuted nearly enough, because the rate with which you encounter insults is rising, because people have less respect and don't care about the consequences, if there are any in the first place.
The attorney is of the philosophy, that if you think this is ever so important, then we'll award it with the deliberious, mindful, thought it deserves.
The witness that laughs saying you don't expect this at the welfare office..... I'm a welfare caseworker. Yes, I do expect this. I often have clients threaten me. A fellow coworker had a client smash a computer monitor into her face. She was out on worker's compensation for months, then never came back. So yes, this isn't uncommon.
I felt like it was likely that this wasn’t the most peaceful job, but I decided that that might be a stereotype. Like with most stereotypes, there is a reason that they exist.
@@Suzi64gradhe's what's knows as a '1st amendment auditor' (I call them 1st Amendment Agitators) A perfect example of 'Just bc you can doesn't mean you should' Most are annoying AF, but They follow each other online and keep telling each other how awesome they are
@@Suzi64grad yes, he's obviously one of them....but you make a great point about the lawyer. Most SCs prefer to blather for themselves in court. At least he got a lawyer who is as boring as all of them.😂😂😂
Yeah, the defense attorney's speech patterns definitely resemble post stroke. The way that she will kind of get stuck half way through a thought. The way that she at times stains to get the words out. And the come and go nature of it. Overall, if she did have a stroke, she is doing remarkably well.
I missed the live stream, sad. I was able to speed this up to 1.25 speed and it isn't so bad, happy. She sure asks a lot of questions she evidently doesn't know the answer to. I thought that was a never for attorneys. Never ask a question in court that you don't already know the answer.
There's so many incidents of this nature, whether it's a welfare office, post office, police department, city hall, etc.....I think there needs to be some case law to clearly establish when and where these 1A activities are ok and when they're prohibited, and why.
Our defendant was so excited to have a comment AND a subscriber that he managed to get his lawyer to tell the judge AND all of us about it. Good for him.
Darnit, Mike. I haven't sang during a court trial this much since Judge Middleton was standing on a corner in Winslow, Arizona. Seriously, I think he chose this lawyer hoping the jury would fall asleep.
Just google this guys name. He goes around recording people, creating confrontations and showing disgusting behavior to police. He has other court cases. It will catch up with him eventually.
Ppl confront him just like every other auditor. He records in public places, the whole point is to show ppl like this security guard that they don’t follow laws. In a cheap excuse yea it’s kinda messed up but tbh it’s the law, he’s allowed to record in areas and ppl try to stop him and in that way they are breaking the laws, and shyt like this happens. The auditor is in the right. He got harassed the second he hit the door, in a area of the building he was allowed to record in, the security guard started it, trying to grab the phone and by touching the defendant he is in the wrong, the defendant had all right to knock the security guard one time. He was treated wrongly from the jump. There’s videos of other security guards doing the the right thing and the behavior isn’t like this security, the security was wrong , per the law
Oh my goodness, I am betting that this defense attorney has had an injury that makes her talk this way. But it's nearly unbearable to listen to at normal speed.
Why do you think that? I hadn't considered her having an injury or something going on with her brain. But thinking about it, something is very wrong for sure.
It's hypno-speech. By monotone droning, extending her monologs as much as possible, and inserting no inflection, she wipes all but her input from the listener. Her drone becomes the sum total remembered.
@@ludditeneaderthal it also sounds like people that have had strokes, or traumatic injury like a head gun shot, that have learned to talk again. If there is some hearing loss, they are almost always monotonal.
I HAD to bump this to 1.75X speed, there is NO way I’d have been able to stay with this live and remain on normal speed. She was painful in SO many ways! Add that, her spending so much time on signs and layouts of the building was insane. Lawyers should not be able to do that unless they can tie it into something. In this case, it doesn’t matter about signs, entries, doorways, etc. Did the guy hit him and if so, was it self defence!? Period. Get on with the facts and stop this dumb sh*t.
Typical defense strategy. Get the jury to think the issue is whether or not he saw signs, not the real issue of his assault after he was told he could not video record.
The signs are irrelevant. Fact is that he is allowed to record, and yet the security guard for whatever reason assaulted him first. He was warned to back off and when he didn't, the defendant defended himself... He never entered the area where recording is prohibited so the guard had no right to assault him. Even the security guard admitted recording is allowed in the hallway and lobby. Yet he approached him in the Hallway and assaulted him. He has the right to defend himself with a reasonable amount of force. He warned the guard and then punched him 2 times until he backed off. The jury got it right, the video doesn't lie.
@@RedeyedJedi00exactly. I'm glad there are at least some people in the comments that understand the scope of self defense and recording in public spaces.
@@RedeyedJedi00it baffles me that charges were even brought. Even the way this was framed in court seemed so bizarre that the defense attorney didn’t do a better job driving home this point from the beginning. Man assaulted by overzealous security guard enforcing a rule that either does not exist or is unlawful.
I was driving and listening to this; since I wasn’t actually watching it, there were several times when I thought I had lost service due to how long the pauses were when the defendant’s attorney was asking questions. 😂
What a great witness! 😂😂 I can believe him for sure, as he has just no idea where he is ...in the morning, just to have a morning stroll, then, oops! 😂😂😂
If he’s found guilty he’s got great grounds for appeal. It’s been shown countless times that a curative instruction sometimes is not enough to prevent jury bias.
I feel like ive been assaulted for watching the entire video. I cant get this time back. Tho the pain of waiting for her to give a pic to the jury, i would've enjoyed it more if all of the sudden someone just went bday suit streaking across the room behind the bearded mannequin in the back! 😂
I think the judge erred in denying the defense of property instruction. What the defendant perceived the guard’s intent was and whether the force used was reasonable are both jury questions.
The result seems right to me. If the security guard got grabbyhands and reached for the guy's phone, well, he can't do that and he might get pushed off. If the guy's a problem beyond what the security guy can handle, call the cops and have him trespassed.
@@mgrom2 Nope. Not to take someone's property. I don't condone the loser punching him but that's the law. You can't touch someone's property. I think the defendant was in the wrong in terms of being an instigator but the American way is your person is not to be touched.
@@montemask I can trespass anyone I want. If you're standing on my front lawn shouting something, and I don't want you there, I can tell you to get off my property. Because, well, it's my property.
@@laughingcoyote111 yes sir, you're correct. On your front lawn. But in a public building, a man would need to commit some type of unlawful offense, to be trespassed.
This was the right call. Guy is filming somewhere he was allowed to and some 4x stroke deaf guy in a clown suit tried grabbing at his camera and he responded by defending himself. The security guard KNOWS or SHOULD KNOW he was not allowed to go hands-on. He ignored that, whether it was intentionally or because he has a mental deficit. Either way, i doubt he'll do that again
These security guards who have to deal with these Feralauditors need to take smoke machines to work - as soon as the auditor starts videoing, just start the smoke machine.
Mike, while I agree with your conclusion on the trial, I'm also not concerned with his verdict of Not Guilty - that will likely embolden him, and he'll get into more conflicts in the future. Sooner or later, his luck will run out.
After the defendants attorney starts off with, "What we have here" my reaction was "a failure to communicate " when you said it right after that I nearly fell out of my chair laughing!😂
That's my Axl!!
I loose it ever time the gopher spins and gives the greatest stink eye ever !! 😂😂😂
I think I've never been so thankful to miss the live and be replay crew
Omg ikr! I put it on 1.75x and she was still slow!! I couldn't understand anyone else if I put it on 2x but I wish I could just put her on like 4x😂😂
Ditto did quite a few clicks on the FF button and was doing something else with this as backround ..the prosecutions questions for the witness went in circles for an hour …
It's a bad sign when you have to be told the video is not frozen, lol.
The defense attorney is speaking in double-double space like a college essay.
She’s trying to meet the minimum word requirement
I’m listening on 1.25 speed. I’d bump it up, but then every one else is too fast.
This is the attorney that was munching on her sandwich while in zoom court. So unprofessional.
I wish future lawyers had to watch these kinds of trials. Then they wouldn’t be as nervous as I was when I thought trial was supposed to look like LA Law…
They probably do! Had there been UA-cam long ago, it would have taken me way less time to learn the fiddle.
Is this a courtroom??
@@sydneysomer9958 court is where the trial is
(that was supposed to be a play on "home is where the heart is" but obviously it doesn't rhyme with that or anything so it just reads like a regular statement)
Mike, I'd pay to see you jumping up and down screaming for a mistrial 😁
😂
The Officer can't say he knows my client from previous encounters, he can't CONFIRM my client's an idiot in open court!
"In this bulding, we're all spaced out. Buh-buh-buh- Benny and the Jets"
😅😅😅
The defense attorney actually graduated law school?! 😂….Also, the city’s attorney looks like a first year college student….😂.
I work for DCS and cases and privacy issues are never discussed in the lobby.
is that a courtroom? Why does it look like a business seminar for middle managers?
Right. It so dose. It make it looks like that they have no court building
I get the fact that lawyers bill by the hour, but this defence lawyer is taking the
p!ss.
Daryl Brooks stalled less than that defense attorney.
The prosecutor was worse, not stalling but misspoke just about every word.
Early on in the trial, I thought she went to her car
@@jasonhanney547😂😂😂
I’m dead 😂
I watched that entire trial when it happened and I had no clue about sov cits. I thought he was just being ridiculous. Now that I know I have even more respect for the judge not actually losing her crap on him every time he spewed his BS.
The judge and his constant,”uh uh’s” is driving me crazy 🙀
The whole cast of characters are unreal! 😳
Right!!??, it's annoying and distracting
Yeesss! I wish Mike could delete them!
I listen to LTWM videos on my daily commute. I’m on my third day and still here. 🤣
No way I’m leaving now. I’ve stuck with it this far with the Defense attorney 😱
The prosecutor really needs to get some asked and answered objections in.
The comment about the defense attorney being post-stroke, makes absolute sense! I have a nursing background and have seen this in Neurology Units quite often.
It has taken me ALL day to listen to this at work. Thank God I've been drinking coffee. Why am I so fascinated with this trisl, lmao😂 😂😂😂😂
Idk, but I also can’t stop listening.
Like choosing to participate in my own torture.
Imagine the defense attorney in a big 6 week trial, something like Depp vs. Heard or The State vs. Darrell Brooks!! Id find not guilty just to get her to STFU!!!
I'm shocked a sovereign citizen auditor could afford a lawyer who had a stroke
4 strokes and deaf, seemingly suffering from dementia.
Good thing he's running security at a government facility🙄
Thos woman lawyer must speak this way to stretch out billable hours. This is a slam dunk case and she's fumbling past a lot of relevance.
As I kept watching…. I kept wondering…. Are these bitches winging this shit!?
Do you think it’s just her natural cadence, or is she unprepared and trying to figure out what to say as she goes?
In an altercation, it’s better to lose the physical fight rather than to strike first. That puts you in a lot stronger position than you responding to a threatened strike.
Unless they use a knife or gun 😂
Holy total beastmode! Three long live streams in one day!
I would be terribly afraid having her represent me at trial. I would be afraid that jurors would drift off, more than normal, and miss an important point.
I agree with the jury. I default to "innocent until proven guilty" and the city did not prove guilt. I maintain a lot of doubt. Especially after the one guy testified that the security guard was being aggressive, and the security guard was not very credible at all.
That alone, gives me reasonable doubts.
I agree. Good thing there was the witness that thought he was the best evidence state had. Lol I think he was the one that got the not guilty verdict. If the security guard wouldn't have reached several times for the phone it would have been guilty. I don't believe just because security gets a paycheck they can take things from others there. If someone is rattling keys and it's annoying they can't just snatch them out of your hands. They can ask you to leave, block you and call police. Was the "journalist " a jerk, annoying and looking for an argument yes I believe so.
that''s why they get 12 people, it's a reasonably high bar
Yeah it sounds like Mike knows this guy from something else (called him a 'knuckle-dragger') and that's clouding his judgment. Or he's saying it to drive engagement b/c it's mind-boggling to say this is a guilty verdict.
@@justatest90😂😂 Who really cares tho
I thought there was drama at the very beginning of the trial about the position of the podium. The judge told them it wouldn't be moved, when she got her turn to address the court I noticed it was moved?
As another 5b have learned so much from your channel. Thank you!
This defense attorney's questioning is as painful as pulling eye teeth.
Eye teeth are easy. Tricuspids are harder to pull because they have 3-4 roots.
No, I've had a tooth pulled. It's worse!
The hamster turning the wheel in her brain broke 3 of its legs
@@Sky_KingMVBut for the last teeth I had pulled, they knocked me out. If only that could be done during her questioning, we’d all be a little happier.
Weird questions!
Peter Navarro? Is he gonna sing ' Puff the magic Dragon ' ?
Jury duty was a great show. I hope they do a second season.
Hey, Mike. Merry Christmas to you and the law dogs.
The man who had four strokes within a year could speak more clearly, quickly and succinctly than the defense attorney, she was horrible.
My immediate reaction as well. I can’t believe she passed a bar exam, not only based on incompetence, but she would still be filling out her identification info when the time was up.
A major problem with the video is that the fraudirors manipulate viewers’ impressions by calling out protests to actions the innocent LEO’s aren’t doing (stop hitting me, when an observer (like mom) can’t see what’s going on between the parties.
They play with the zoom to manipulate how close someone seems to be them, I’ve seen that on several of their videos where they were called out.
They edit events so that critical elements are seamlessly deleted.
And their self-righteous insistence that they have the right to do what they’re doing is completely lawful, when it’s not colors perception to those either not familiar with the law or the behavior of these thugs.
They’re also masters of what used to be called splitting but is now referred to as triangulation. They’re nasty to an extreme to one party and butter wouldn’t melt, etc., to another, then play the one they’ve been flattering against the other.
When you see them in action they’re unable to utter a sentence without vulgarities and incessant demeaning comments.
Currently they’re under the misconception that public employees, especially LEO, have to accept whatever abuse they dish out, no matter how horrific, including Glenn Cerio’s extremely racist rant against an AA officer who maintained a grace and dignity as very few of us could have maintained. (And for which reason, Cerio should be grateful his ugly head is still attached.)
Both the SovC-its and the Frauditors are malignant narcissists, and use the same tactics.
The way I keep myself from reacting as I think they deserve is to realize that narcissists are predators who are emerging in growing numbers, thanks to our consumerist-based economic systems reinforcing their behavior. Ultimately they’ll either cull or be culled from our excessive populations…hopefully while the planet will still be salvageable.
Sorry. It’s the pain meds I’m on, along with realizing just how much this inane vs. insane (my favorite case law decision) will spur on these pos.
There are ways to cut this all short but the unfettered aggression persons like Farley are getting away with -and actually making money on from a lunatic following-seems to be tapping into a truly dangerous trend right now.
Ohhhh it's so painful. The officer seems more comfortable in court than either of the attorneys.
@@katecoe8322agreed. Seems that at the very least, a caveat should be given before the video exhibits are shown to the jury, detailing a complete listing of edits to the raw video that were made by the defendant or on behalf of the defendant. It doesn’t solve for the false cries for effect, but at the least, informs the jury that they are viewing the aspects of the interaction the defendant deemed important.
@@katecoe8322 how do you feel about civil rights? also what's the name of your favorite case law?
Aw look, the La Quinta Banquet Court. Where's the goat?
My assessment is this- shes a solid defense attorney, she just needs to lay off the Xanax!! 😅
Oh, it's a female? 😅
OMG where did you find this defense attorney I'm surprised the jury did not fall asleep
Also we might have been able to cut this time by a 3rd if we could remove all the "ummm" and "ahhh". Esp the judges. 🥴
wherever he found her it was a good find because he won.
He won so she couldn't have been that ineffective.
Witnesses need to slow down. Wait to see if there is an objection. If not, think if this is actually a clear question and say "can you rephrase that" if it isn't.
Just when I think it can't be more hilarious, she asks another great question 😂😂😂😂
Good stuff Mike.😊
I would have been objecting for relevance nearly the whole time...
The security guard was a terrible witness for the state and lost the case. He admitted he had not been in the area that you cannot record and he grabbed at the phone which both were against policy. It sickens me because even my 12 year old said this defendant is a DB.
I think he may be married to the defense attorney! 🤔😉😂
@@jmiller4193 wow
It sickens you? The 1st amendment allows you to record anywhere in public, including inside publically accessible areas in public buildings. There's no expectation of privacy in public.... if you grabbed that security guards phone and he beat you up, you'd be charged with assault.... why do you think that is. You can't grab people or their property, and people have the right to defend themselves
@rhinotools1143 yes it sickens me. Unfortunately it is not against the law to be an a-hole. When my 12 year old autistic boy recognizes the guy is a DB that should tell you something.
@@robertjandorf8125 yup it is sickening. In the country I live in it IS illegal to be an asshole, at least being a verbal asshole is punishable by law. Any insult can get you a fine. It is even kinda like a felony, you will have that charge and conviction in your criminal record. Even if you insult somebody indirectly you brake the law, for example if you say: "It's not my opinion, but my buddy would say that you are an asshole!" The person you indirectly insulted can press charges and the fines are between 200-2000$ and in repeating heavy cases you can get prison time for up to a year. although that is extremely rare.
The reason this is illegal is: The human dignity shall not be violated. Don't know if I translated it right, but it is the very first Sentence of our laws.
Although we have freedom of speech, you are not allowed to degrade/violate a humans dignity.
It is a little bit sad, that it isn't prosecuted nearly enough, because the rate with which you encounter insults is rising, because people have less respect and don't care about the consequences, if there are any in the first place.
The attorney is of the philosophy, that if you think this is ever so important, then we'll award it with the deliberious, mindful, thought it deserves.
The witness that laughs saying you don't expect this at the welfare office..... I'm a welfare caseworker. Yes, I do expect this. I often have clients threaten me. A fellow coworker had a client smash a computer monitor into her face. She was out on worker's compensation for months, then never came back.
So yes, this isn't uncommon.
Yikes!
I felt like it was likely that this wasn’t the most peaceful job, but I decided that that might be a stereotype.
Like with most stereotypes, there is a reason that they exist.
Question…Is Mr Farley one of those sovereign nuts? Wasn’t sure since he has an attorney.
@@Suzi64gradhe's what's knows as a '1st amendment auditor' (I call them 1st Amendment Agitators)
A perfect example of 'Just bc you can doesn't mean you should'
Most are annoying AF, but They follow each other online and keep telling each other how awesome they are
@@Suzi64grad yes, he's obviously one of them....but you make a great point about the lawyer. Most SCs prefer to blather for themselves in court. At least he got a lawyer who is as boring as all of them.😂😂😂
I don't think this is Post-Stroke behavior, I think it is Mid-Stroke behavior. LOL
Yeah, the defense attorney's speech patterns definitely resemble post stroke. The way that she will kind of get stuck half way through a thought. The way that she at times stains to get the words out. And the come and go nature of it. Overall, if she did have a stroke, she is doing remarkably well.
I think she's reading everything directly and losing her place now and then. No emotion-deadpan reading.
Glad I wasnt on the jury....I would have fallen asleep listening to her questions!
Public forum doctrine is in effect INSIDE ANY GOVT building. They can impose restrictions such as requiring ID,or NO FILMING
No they can’t. If they are discussing private info they need to take it behind a door! This is insane to me that people actually believe this.
Nope. Public building. First amendment. Enjoy it while we still have it. Restrictions have to be reasonable and serve a purpose.
Where do you find this law ...
I missed the live stream, sad. I was able to speed this up to 1.25 speed and it isn't so bad, happy. She sure asks a lot of questions she evidently doesn't know the answer to. I thought that was a never for attorneys. Never ask a question in court that you don't already know the answer.
There's so many incidents of this nature, whether it's a welfare office, post office, police department, city hall, etc.....I think there needs to be some case law to clearly establish when and where these 1A activities are ok and when they're prohibited, and why.
Should have been guilty of battery.
This is 45 years of my life I’ll never get back! And this is only the first witness! Someone wake-up the jury!
Remember, Chilli decastro trial is coming up in Nevada. Someone already requested to have a camera in court. 😊
He won his appeal :(
Good job jury! Followed the law instead of Mike's feelings.
Our defendant was so excited to have a comment AND a subscriber that he managed to get his lawyer to tell the judge AND all of us about it. Good for him.
😂🤣 You’re probably very correct!
😂😂😂
Ask Ashly if it’s ok to hit her for getting to close
My favorite episode so far. This is hysterical 😂😂
Can someone check this room for carbon monoxide???
Wasn't Fortunado. a character in Poe's A Cask of Amontillado (Sp.)
Glad to see the kid from Malcom in the Middle was able to get rid of the wheelchair and become an attorney!
Oh I’ve always wondered how these played out in court! Thank you for this. Watching now… 🤩
Darnit, Mike. I haven't sang during a court trial this much since Judge Middleton was standing on a corner in Winslow, Arizona.
Seriously, I think he chose this lawyer hoping the jury would fall asleep.
Can you tell me what video that’s in?? 🌵
She won. Must have been effective enough.
How is that lady a lawyer?
Because we never saw the video, it is difficult to see how the jury made that determination.
As usual awesome video. The quality of everything you do is fantastic
Just google this guys name. He goes around recording people, creating confrontations and showing disgusting behavior to police. He has other court cases. It will catch up with him eventually.
pretty chad isn't it
Ppl confront him just like every other auditor. He records in public places, the whole point is to show ppl like this security guard that they don’t follow laws. In a cheap excuse yea it’s kinda messed up but tbh it’s the law, he’s allowed to record in areas and ppl try to stop him and in that way they are breaking the laws, and shyt like this happens. The auditor is in the right. He got harassed the second he hit the door, in a area of the building he was allowed to record in, the security guard started it, trying to grab the phone and by touching the defendant he is in the wrong, the defendant had all right to knock the security guard one time. He was treated wrongly from the jump. There’s videos of other security guards doing the the right thing and the behavior isn’t like this security, the security was wrong , per the law
We call them Frauditors, and they're all potentially dangerous for various reasons.
Same story. Another frauditor that cares nothing about the Constitution or clarity. They only want hits on YT.
Idiots like this will end up doing more harm towards our 1st amendment rights than good.
So man following the law defends himself against attempted theft.
Oh my goodness, I am betting that this defense attorney has had an injury that makes her talk this way. But it's nearly unbearable to listen to at normal speed.
Why do you think that? I hadn't considered her having an injury or something going on with her brain. But thinking about it, something is very wrong for sure.
It's hypno-speech. By monotone droning, extending her monologs as much as possible, and inserting no inflection, she wipes all but her input from the listener. Her drone becomes the sum total remembered.
@@ludditeneaderthal it also sounds like people that have had strokes, or traumatic injury like a head gun shot, that have learned to talk again. If there is some hearing loss, they are almost always monotonal.
I HAD to bump this to 1.75X speed, there is NO way I’d have been able to stay with this live and remain on normal speed. She was painful in SO many ways! Add that, her spending so much time on signs and layouts of the building was insane. Lawyers should not be able to do that unless they can tie it into something. In this case, it doesn’t matter about signs, entries, doorways, etc. Did the guy hit him and if so, was it self defence!? Period. Get on with the facts and stop this dumb sh*t.
@@ricktaylor14001 I agree. I had to bump the speed to 1.75 also.
Trial of the century
Typical defense strategy. Get the jury to think the issue is whether or not he saw signs, not the real issue of his assault after he was told he could not video record.
The signs are irrelevant. Fact is that he is allowed to record, and yet the security guard for whatever reason assaulted him first. He was warned to back off and when he didn't, the defendant defended himself... He never entered the area where recording is prohibited so the guard had no right to assault him. Even the security guard admitted recording is allowed in the hallway and lobby. Yet he approached him in the Hallway and assaulted him. He has the right to defend himself with a reasonable amount of force. He warned the guard and then punched him 2 times until he backed off. The jury got it right, the video doesn't lie.
@@RedeyedJedi00exactly. I'm glad there are at least some people in the comments that understand the scope of self defense and recording in public spaces.
@@RedeyedJedi00it baffles me that charges were even brought. Even the way this was framed in court seemed so bizarre that the defense attorney didn’t do a better job driving home this point from the beginning.
Man assaulted by overzealous security guard enforcing a rule that either does not exist or is unlawful.
@@jacuzzibusguy prosecutor should be publicly shamed.
I was driving and listening to this; since I wasn’t actually watching it, there were several times when I thought I had lost service due to how long the pauses were when the defendant’s attorney was asking questions. 😂
This woman hasn’t been watching the Law Nerd UA-camrs on Uncivil Law, Lawyer You Know, LTWM , Law and Lumber 🐐🐐🐐 Maya juror shenanigans
What a great witness! 😂😂 I can believe him for sure, as he has just no idea where he is ...in the morning, just to have a morning stroll, then, oops! 😂😂😂
I agree with Mike, if he punched the guard. I don’t want it to be the standard that if someone is wrong they can be punched.
The guard attacked first ..tried to grab someone's other property.
Guards only duty is observe and report..not confront or steal.
Age doesn't matter
The best lawyers food stamps can buy!
Good lord! The defense is painful. Poor jury
55:08 do you remember the Night Court episode in which an attorney has "Tortoiseitis". I... will... be..... brief.
ua-cam.com/video/fNeKg4IutSI/v-deo.htmlsi=udJNDaI5ElLPj46E
Trying to figure out if she's a worse lawyer than all objections lawyer.😅
she can’t be that bad because she got her client a not guilty 🤦🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
If he’s found guilty he’s got great grounds for appeal. It’s been shown countless times that a curative instruction sometimes is not enough to prevent jury bias.
Since we could not see the videos, I have to side with the jury.
So the defense ran out and photo graphs. In a lobby that you’re not suppose to photograph!🤦♀️
The defendant is a BULLY!
You only believe that bcuz of the propaganda style witness testimony.
I feel like ive been assaulted for watching the entire video. I cant get this time back. Tho the pain of waiting for her to give a pic to the jury, i would've enjoyed it more if all of the sudden someone just went bday suit streaking across the room behind the bearded mannequin in the back! 😂
I think the judge erred in denying the defense of property instruction. What the defendant perceived the guard’s intent was and whether the force used was reasonable are both jury questions.
I am used to California, where sidebars are conducted at the bench out of hearing of everyone but the judge and attorneys.
That’s not necessarily a state rule, but by judge, considering the environment of the courtroom.
@@doribellan As long as it is out of the hearing of the jury.
@@davident1 Yes. That ability differs by courtroom.
There’s a video of this clown going into a bail bondsman office and FA and FO… kinda epic!!
The freaking defense attorney sounds like she's 120 years old. 😂
I’m not sure if the defense attorney is hungover or drunk. Smh. This whole case was just messy to listen to.
Agreed. She is absolutely bizarre 😮
Not drunk. No slurred speech. She talks like a stroke victim.
Jury duty is by far the funniest series I’ve ever seen.
The result seems right to me. If the security guard got grabbyhands and reached for the guy's phone, well, he can't do that and he might get pushed off. If the guy's a problem beyond what the security guy can handle, call the cops and have him trespassed.
Doesn't work that way. What the defendant was doing was well within his constitutional rights. Period
@@mgrom2 Nope. Not to take someone's property. I don't condone the loser punching him but that's the law. You can't touch someone's property. I think the defendant was in the wrong in terms of being an instigator but the American way is your person is not to be touched.
You can't trespass someone for no reason. Especially if he's acting on the 1st amendment.
@@montemask I can trespass anyone I want. If you're standing on my front lawn shouting something, and I don't want you there, I can tell you to get off my property. Because, well, it's my property.
@@laughingcoyote111 yes sir, you're correct. On your front lawn. But in a public building, a man would need to commit some type of unlawful offense, to be trespassed.
The main thing i took from this is that anybody, and i mean anybody can be a lawyer.
I love Sovcit trials. They are so much more interesting than those pesky average citizen trials.
Not sov cit.
He's definitely not a sov cit
@@mikecatania6364 It is a big tent and everyone is welcome
sweet Jesus, i hope the Defense Atty isnt paud by the hour....she is slower than a snail.
Um, You Tube IS social media.
I always thought
U-Tube was part of the "Outer Net
😂. All Stay Safe
💯✅🇺🇲😜❤🕊️
Mike thought he was going to get a guilty verdict!!! And he didn't!!! Lol😅lol😅
This was the right call.
Guy is filming somewhere he was allowed to and some 4x stroke deaf guy in a clown suit tried grabbing at his camera and he responded by defending himself.
The security guard KNOWS or SHOULD KNOW he was not allowed to go hands-on. He ignored that, whether it was intentionally or because he has a mental deficit. Either way, i doubt he'll do that again
I agree with you Mike. I've seen several videos with people doing this just to cause trouble. He had no right to hit him, much less several times.
Oh he did that security guard is a tyrant he had no right to try and steal his property
The freedom Eagles fly in To Hurston county he doesn’t have to follow a policy he has freedom of the press
Youre going to let someone take your stuff from you and prevent you from using your rights? Lol wow
Not guilty is the right way, now he can sue
He threw the punch because there was an old security guard in front of him. If there was someone of equal stature he would have exited the building.
Did the video show him throw a punch?
That guy needs to retire!
These security guards who have to deal with these Feralauditors need to take smoke machines to work - as soon as the auditor starts videoing, just start the smoke machine.
Mike, while I agree with your conclusion on the trial, I'm also not concerned with his verdict of Not Guilty - that will likely embolden him, and he'll get into more conflicts in the future. Sooner or later, his luck will run out.