A Level Physics Revision: All of Uncertainties (in under 11 minutes!)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 177

  • @zhelyo_physics
    @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +12

    Hi guys! If you are looking for extra practice questions, I made a huge problem set of my own problems with detailed solutions. Check it at my online shop here: koji.to/k/9uCs

  • @hman0121
    @hman0121 2 роки тому +143

    This was explained very succinctly and coherently - thanks.

  • @yasminkhalifa8709
    @yasminkhalifa8709 2 роки тому +58

    I'm grateful beyond measure for this explanation, it helped me a lot

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +5

      glad to hear this! : ) thanks for the comment!

  • @connormumby2487
    @connormumby2487 Рік тому +26

    Excellent video, cleared up all the confusion I've had around uncertainties. 👍

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +1

      thank you so much for the comment! Glad to hear!

  • @Thobanatif
    @Thobanatif 2 роки тому +11

    best of the best explanations i can't find a way to thank you !!!!!

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +3

      Glad to hear! Thanks a lot for the comment!

  • @michaelmarz8004
    @michaelmarz8004 Рік тому +6

    Indeed this was a great video I couldn't understand the topic for the whole of last year thanks

  • @katokyambadde9454
    @katokyambadde9454 Рік тому +5

    Amazing Video. Clear and Precise. Love it!!!!

  • @sweetvictoryy
    @sweetvictoryy 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much. You've saved my classmates and I from possibly failing a quiz 😭

  • @ric6383
    @ric6383 2 роки тому +5

    Well done! It is so, so annoying that different exam boards can't agree whether the absolute uncertainty is the smallest graduation, or half the smallest graduation. AQA and Edexcel for example.

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому

      Totally agreed! Thanks for the comment!

    • @leuanjennings9929
      @leuanjennings9929 2 роки тому

      Do you know what aqa want?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +2

      @@leuanjennings9929 Yep! AQA uses half of the smallest measurement value (that's what I used at university too when I was in a lab and it's pretty sensible! )

    • @leowalentiny1638
      @leowalentiny1638 Рік тому +1

      Would anyone be kind enough to tell me what OCRA wants or tell me where to find out? thanks

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +3

      OCR takes absolute uncertainty to be +- 1 of the smallest measurement

  • @ellisfletcher3491
    @ellisfletcher3491 2 роки тому +7

    this was a very good video sir easily and concisely explained helped much more than any other video ive seen Cheers!

  • @quinnhamilton2821
    @quinnhamilton2821 4 місяці тому +1

    thank you so much, now I certainly feel more confident on uncertainties.

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  4 місяці тому

      great to hear! thanks for the comment!

    • @justinysghost5298
      @justinysghost5298 3 місяці тому +1

      Missed chance to say now I'm certain about uncertainties

  • @HammtariProductions
    @HammtariProductions 6 днів тому

    Thank you so much you are an absolute legend! My teacher cannot teach this at all

  • @yaminaboub-jo2lb
    @yaminaboub-jo2lb 8 місяців тому +1

    I am so certain about uncertainties now . Thank you so much for this explanation .. those are the parts of this concept that I always cofuse and forget ❤ ( equations containing uncertainties)

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  8 місяців тому +1

      Thank you so much for the comment! Glad this is useful!

  • @anotherguycalled6253
    @anotherguycalled6253 3 місяці тому +1

    This video was very informative and helped me understand uncertainties I don't know what I would do without you

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  3 місяці тому

      fantastic to hear! Thank you for the comment!

  • @samaviashahzad7761
    @samaviashahzad7761 Рік тому +1

    I am so grateful for this video, it helped me a lot in clearing out my concepts. Thank you so much!

  • @Sky_flyer_167
    @Sky_flyer_167 3 місяці тому

    This video explains much more better than my teacher, thx!

  • @widenedmale8315
    @widenedmale8315 2 роки тому +6

    this was so genuinely clear and helpful

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot for your comment! Much appreciated!

  • @Novaiyx
    @Novaiyx Місяць тому

    This was super helpful, thank you!

  • @kaihyuchin
    @kaihyuchin Рік тому +1

    very helpful sir. thank you very much!! you are a life saver

  • @sg_chiangdahwe
    @sg_chiangdahwe 2 місяці тому

    Many thanks for making the vedios. It is really usful for my coming physics unit quiz!

  • @yasmaster20
    @yasmaster20 Місяць тому +1

    I and no longer uncertain

  • @101sew7
    @101sew7 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the explanation! Say you measured a length of wire with diameter: 0.27mm (+-) 0.01mm. And you wanted to divide by 2 to get a value for the radius, what would you do to the uncertainty?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +2

      If you are after the radius just divide the value by two but you retain the same uncertainty. So the radius would be 0.135 +- 0.01 mm as you only consider the value you measured.

  • @dominus_ignaviae
    @dominus_ignaviae 7 місяців тому

    Thank you so much! Super clear and easy! ❤

  • @dolfinw4179
    @dolfinw4179 11 місяців тому

    Im certainly certain of the uncertainties after watching your videos! 😄

  • @mariowen8063
    @mariowen8063 Рік тому

    Thank you so much for this explanation!

  • @sadiaiditry
    @sadiaiditry Рік тому +1

    Thanks a lot for this informative video. The content was understandable and made me clear about the uncertainties ideas ☺️

  • @declanpinto9302
    @declanpinto9302 7 місяців тому

    at 5:30 isn't the total voltage 5+5+4

  • @azizbekoqbotayev103
    @azizbekoqbotayev103 3 місяці тому

    plenty of thanks, you did deserve it

  • @lucasandu5591
    @lucasandu5591 2 роки тому +1

    Best explanation ever!

  • @rosesay9652
    @rosesay9652 2 роки тому +1

    5:00 Even if you are subtracting the total do you subtract the total when working out the percentage uncertainty?
    So if you wanted to find the extension would the equation for the percentage uncertainty be
    (Absolute uncertainty /extension) or (absolute uncertainty/ original length + new length)? Thank you

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      Great question! It would be ( abs uncertainty in new length/new length + abs uncertainty in original length/original length )x 100

  • @ladyfoxwf1075
    @ladyfoxwf1075 Рік тому +2

    I'm confused, what reason is there to add or take away, multiply or divide or raise to a power? How do I know which one to do? I don't think I'm getting the "why's". Why are we doing this?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +4

      Excellent question! So...absolute uncertainties - we can just add them as we have they have the same units. E.g. mass +mass can gives us kg+kg which is also kg.
      If we have speed , v=d/t we can't just add meters+seconds in physics. So we convert them to percentages which are dimensionless (unitless).
      If we raise something to a power, we are essentially using it twice or three times or whatever the power is. e.g. I^2 = I*I so we use it twice, so we multiply the uncertainty by 2. Hope this helps!

    • @ladyfoxwf1075
      @ladyfoxwf1075 Рік тому +1

      @@zhelyo_physics Ohh thank you so much! This helps alot

  • @MontyBleiker
    @MontyBleiker 2 місяці тому

    For the beginning example of 5.46 V +/- 0.001V, I know we can’t fully trust the last digit, but it wouldn’t between 5.45 and 4.47. If the actual value was 4.453, the reading would show as 4.45V, not 4.46V, so shouldn’t it be between 4.455 and 4.465, as anything in that range would round to what you would see on he voltmeter, meaning the uncertainty is +/- 0.005?
    The uncertainty is only the same as the resolution of the instrument you are using requires two measurements to get a value, like a mm ruler. You would measure something from 0mm to another value mm, but where you put the ruler on 0 still has an uncertainty of +/- 0.5mm, so you are adding the uncertainties of the value you have measured and the 0mm uncertainty to get an uncertainty equal to the resolution. With things like mass balances that are digital, we assume that it is always zeroed correctly so there is no need to account for 0 value uncertainty

  • @theclassic_gamer_fifamobile
    @theclassic_gamer_fifamobile 20 днів тому

    when we were making calculations using the uncertainity, why were getting the value for the + only and not the -?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  20 днів тому

      you can think of it as the absolute value, i.e. if the absolute uncertainty is 0.1, then 5+-0.1 gives the range between 4.9 and 5.1 Hope this helps !

    • @theclassic_gamer_fifamobile
      @theclassic_gamer_fifamobile 19 днів тому +1

      @zhelyo_physics no what I meant is, that this 0.1 has + and - right, then why are we doing calculations using the + 0.1 and not the -0.1? Thanks and have a nice day

  • @muha4193
    @muha4193 7 місяців тому

    thank you so much! im understanding this one day before my exams haha

  • @ridhwaanfatehmamode5560
    @ridhwaanfatehmamode5560 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for adding subtitle❤

  • @izzatillonusratov8323
    @izzatillonusratov8323 2 роки тому +1

    thank you , pls keeping on making useful videos

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot for the comment, much appreciated!

  • @milanbatinica244
    @milanbatinica244 2 роки тому

    Greatness from this guy👑

  • @strawberry1555
    @strawberry1555 3 місяці тому

    much clear than my teacher

  • @c0bratr1stan
    @c0bratr1stan 2 місяці тому +2

    exam in an hour and 30 minutes 😅

  • @eesaagulzar5359
    @eesaagulzar5359 Рік тому

    do we need to know the level of confindence? and how to calc it for AS physics?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Depends on the syllabus/exam board, I always recommend using it as a checklist.

  • @MotorwayGaming2018
    @MotorwayGaming2018 6 місяців тому

    0:29 What does Edexcel assume it is?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  6 місяців тому

      The edexcel spec lists it for a ruler as half the smallest measurement (half the resolution). It also lists the definition of resolution as the smallest reading possible. You can also calculate it as half the range of the data if you are given a lot of measurements and no uncertainty. Hope this helps!

    • @MotorwayGaming2018
      @MotorwayGaming2018 6 місяців тому

      @@zhelyo_physics Ah, I see, thank you.

  • @flighteaglediy8220
    @flighteaglediy8220 7 місяців тому

    what about going from a diameter to a radius sir? Do you assume that the %uncertainty is the same rather than the absolute (ie absolute halves)?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  7 місяців тому

      excellent point. Nope the percentage uncertainty in the diameter is twice as small as the measured value is twice as big.

  • @toriiramlall6638
    @toriiramlall6638 Рік тому +1

    Hi sir, i have my physics practical in a few days and i see a lot of questions on estimating the percentage uncertainty. Could you please explain to me how I'd approach this question 🙏

  • @MalakBeljadid
    @MalakBeljadid 10 місяців тому

    Great video , thanks ❤

  • @KungFuBarbie-pc7hb
    @KungFuBarbie-pc7hb 4 місяці тому

    Is this for edexcel ial unit 3 too?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  4 місяці тому

      the rules for uncertainties are extremely similar across all a levels : ) yes it is applicable however you should use your specification/syllabus as a checklist when going through this. Hope this helps!

    • @KungFuBarbie-pc7hb
      @KungFuBarbie-pc7hb 4 місяці тому

      @@zhelyo_physics well my syllabus says students are not expected to compound percentage uncertainties. Is compounding uncertainties same as combining them?

  • @LouisCarvalho-jf4dq
    @LouisCarvalho-jf4dq 4 місяці тому

    Do we take smallest value or half the smallest value in uncertainties foe edexcel IAS

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  4 місяці тому

      The edexcel spec lists it for a ruler as half the smallest measurement (half the resolution). It also lists the definition of resolution as the smallest reading possible. You can also calculate it as half the range of the data if you are given a lot of measurements and no uncertainty. Hope this helps!

  • @mlareek2134
    @mlareek2134 3 місяці тому

    Thank you 😭😭🙏🏻❤️

  • @l3g3ndary_dev32
    @l3g3ndary_dev32 3 місяці тому

    Thank you!

  • @lilblitz7406
    @lilblitz7406 Рік тому

    Thank you so much sir
    Is this video enough if I fully understand it for a level physics uncertainties?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      All the theory is covered, I would do lots of practice problems next!
      I have some here: ua-cam.com/video/vhdI0eZf5nY/v-deo.html Thanks a lot for the comment! : )

  • @HitjeviMumbango
    @HitjeviMumbango 2 місяці тому

    Thank you so much

  • @sanwalmalik5300
    @sanwalmalik5300 Рік тому

    Can we also do these using the formula
    Max-original

  • @plty3931
    @plty3931 Рік тому

    Thank you I love you 🙏🏾🙏🏾

  • @erfrerferfrere
    @erfrerferfrere Рік тому

    u see the adding or subtracting resistance example if it was subtracting would it be 5-4=1 or still adding the a uncertainties to get 5+4=9

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      excellent question, we always add uncertainties.

    • @erfrerferfrere
      @erfrerferfrere Рік тому

      @@zhelyo_physics but i thought that wasnt the uncertainty i thought that was the value u measure do you still always add it even if the question is substract

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Do you mean absolute or percentage uncertainty? As I mentioned we always add uncertainties in both cases. If we add or subtract things we add absolute unc. If we multiply or divide we add percentage unc.

    • @erfrerferfrere
      @erfrerferfrere Рік тому

      @@zhelyo_physics apologies for the confusion check 5:30 of the video if the question was subtraction would it be 5-4 or still 5+4 to get 9

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      @@erfrerferfrere if we take away the voltage it would be 5-4 = 1V but this is the voltage, not the uncertainty. The uncertainty would still be the same, 1V +- 0.3 V

  • @MOI-su4lx
    @MOI-su4lx 6 місяців тому

    What software r u using its actually good

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  6 місяців тому +1

      it's microsoft whiteboard which is free, since filming the video though the software has become a lot slower, there might be better alternatives, but it's still quite good!

    • @MOI-su4lx
      @MOI-su4lx 6 місяців тому

      @@zhelyo_physics Thank you, sir.

  • @nicholasbomers7771
    @nicholasbomers7771 7 місяців тому

    With your ruler analogy at the start, you state the resolution to be 1mm. Would the absolute uncertainty not then be 0.5mm. You state as much in your note but verbally you said it was still 1mm

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  7 місяців тому

      interstingly that depends on your exam board. At university I always took the resolution to be half of the smallest measurement, AQA typically does that, OCR in A Level Physics takes to be 1 of the smallest measurement. Hope this helps!

  • @jonathanmoges7566
    @jonathanmoges7566 Рік тому

    Hey, can you consider making videos for paper 3

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      I actually have a huge amount out already but will constantly be expanding them - here is a step by step guide for paper 3: ua-cam.com/video/kewwyTfUc_U/v-deo.htmlsi=ti6V1AVPl35n6M-m Have a browse through the channel, I also have lots of questions from paper 3 and all the content filmed.

    • @jonathanmoges7566
      @jonathanmoges7566 Рік тому

      Thank youu
      You have earned yourself a subscriber
      @@zhelyo_physics

  • @oskarwitha_k8258
    @oskarwitha_k8258 2 роки тому

    at 3:36 why were you able to just half it to get the absolute uncertainty?

    • @oskarwitha_k8258
      @oskarwitha_k8258 2 роки тому

      (rather than using p.u equation)

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      actually just a coincidence, I just took 5% of 50 which happens to be 2.5. Excellent question!

    • @oskarwitha_k8258
      @oskarwitha_k8258 2 роки тому

      @@zhelyo_physics ohhhhhhhh, makes so much sense then haha

  • @PavanYK
    @PavanYK Рік тому

    Do we take half the smallest reading or the smallest reading for Uncertainty in OCR A?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому +1

      OCR A usually the smallest reading is the absolute uncertainty unless stated otherwise in the question

  • @axeldaar9100
    @axeldaar9100 8 місяців тому

    Really well explained😁

  • @hamidSohail-vy3ei
    @hamidSohail-vy3ei Рік тому

    do u have videos for your solved Past papers or topical papers for AS Level Physics (9702) syllabus Cambridge?

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Hi sadly no past papers walkthroughs.

    • @hamidSohail-vy3ei
      @hamidSohail-vy3ei Рік тому

      @@zhelyo_physicsdoes your playlist contains all the videos for AS Level (9702) updated syllabus for Cambridge

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Mostly. Around 95% So I design them so that they can be applicable with every exam board. I recommend downloading the specification and ticking concepts as you revise them. Good luck, drop a comment if something doesn't make sense!

  • @Carsgocaboom
    @Carsgocaboom 3 місяці тому

    Thank u so much:33

  • @lewismetcalf4545
    @lewismetcalf4545 Рік тому

    hey I've got this question on my homework that I need help with. it says the uncertainty is 2mm but doesn't say + or - so I'm unsure whether it means +or-1mm or +or-2mm

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Uncertainty is always +- , a measurement of 5 mm +- 2mm means the real value is somewhere between 3 mm and 7 mm . Hope this helps!

  • @devakp8832
    @devakp8832 2 роки тому

    How would you find the percentage uncertainties of an average. For example you're given 5 measurements for the thickness of something and are asked to find the percentage uncertainty given that the measurements are to 3 significant figures

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      I have actually filmed the answer to this: ua-cam.com/video/WOckc29sZJA/v-deo.html this link should take you to the correct timing, but have a look at the time stamp, uncertainty of a data set.

    • @devakp8832
      @devakp8832 2 роки тому

      @@zhelyo_physics This helped me gain a mark today, thanks.

  • @KAPRICELANAEKEDEUGA
    @KAPRICELANAEKEDEUGA Рік тому

    pls sir how did you get 11% in the multiplication and division practice example. i used my calculator but it didn't work

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      Did you use 1.1? I redid it and it's okay. 0.1/5.0*100+0.1/1.1*100 Hope this helps!

  • @stephanmwiya
    @stephanmwiya Рік тому +1

    Gud job... 🤝🤝

  • @sniperhunt3047
    @sniperhunt3047 Рік тому

    Thank you sir 🙏🙏

  • @stephanmwiya
    @stephanmwiya Рік тому

    What if u are given two values and both have uncertainty.,how can u find the fraction uncertainty.... 🙏🙏

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      depends on the problem, think of the fractional uncertainty as a percentage uncertainty and follow the rules in the video depending on the situation : )

  • @thevinecompany7733
    @thevinecompany7733 2 роки тому

    am i correct in saying for the last question that the absolute uncertainty of the volume is +- 4.8m^3? Great video by the way!

  • @oskarwitha_k8258
    @oskarwitha_k8258 2 роки тому

    for the resistance question, would the final answer of it be 4.5 +- 11%??

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому +1

      correct! well done!

    • @oskarwitha_k8258
      @oskarwitha_k8258 2 роки тому

      @@zhelyo_physics ok great, this doesnt seem too bad. thank you so much for your vidoes

  • @abdullah32121
    @abdullah32121 7 місяців тому

    Amazing

  • @muhammadshukat-3731
    @muhammadshukat-3731 3 місяці тому

    Nice lecture 🌝

  • @ishamobashar9853
    @ishamobashar9853 3 місяці тому

    thanks :)

  • @vaster1142
    @vaster1142 2 роки тому

    Are you sure it's in and not Ln? Cos using differential calculus ( since most uncertainties are very close to 0), it's Ln

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому

      for which part of the video exactly sorry? We don't tend to bring in calculus as we normally know the uncertainty exactly from our instrument.

    • @vaster1142
      @vaster1142 2 роки тому

      @@zhelyo_physics 8:22

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 роки тому

      @@vaster1142 yep! If you raise it to a power this is equivalent to multiplication, i.e. you have to ad the percentage uncertainty similarly to other rules. Hope this is helpful!

  • @fahimnabeel606
    @fahimnabeel606 Рік тому

    What if there is negative power

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  Рік тому

      excellent question - for this I would calculate half the range, using this method: ua-cam.com/video/swsLwIyrzQo/v-deo.html

  • @ProductiveGuru-j1u
    @ProductiveGuru-j1u Рік тому

    tysm

  • @user-lb5ys8tm2o
    @user-lb5ys8tm2o Рік тому +1

    🎉

  • @leordeansg
    @leordeansg 8 місяців тому

    good, but video could be shorter.

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  8 місяців тому

      ua-cam.com/video/6FgjfvW1LH8/v-deo.htmlsi=997NOKOXl-fR8LsD here are the rules in 1 minute : )

  • @trueadam8PSL
    @trueadam8PSL 2 місяці тому

    Get a better mic plz

    • @zhelyo_physics
      @zhelyo_physics  2 місяці тому +1

      I did! : ) Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @trueadam8PSL
      @trueadam8PSL 2 місяці тому

      @@zhelyo_physics yes I see, think you could re-record the audio for this?