I have been playing with this racquet for a few months now, it feels great! I would say its definitely a platform racquet off the shelf, but adding weight to 3, 9, 10, 2 and also the same counter weight to the handle, then dropping down to about 48lbs with a poly, it plays like a dream. It helped me fix those short shots, added more pop behind my flat serves, and gave me a bit more access to spin. The only down side is, you need to be able to swing the racquet with that kind of added weight to it comfortably, to reap the benefits of this frame. Solid over all! I switched from the babolat pure strike family for this and I don't think i'm ever going to go back hahah! Nice review!
Interesting, the tennis warehouse review said it was really low powered. Thanks for the review! I currently also use a VCore 95, but interested in a 98 sq inch head with 16 x 19 stick
Yes, compared to their other line the CX200 is the stick for those looking for power. In my personal opinion, it did feel more powerful than rackets like the blade or the pure strike. So according to the Dunlop line, it is control-based, according to other rackets I've played with it was on the higher power end. The Vcore 95 is a wonderful stick, you could take a look at something like the Blade 98 or Head Extreme if you want some more spin!
I agree with you that the racquet sprays the ball long! I have the 18x20 cx 200 tour and that still has an unpredictable launch. In my opinion the power grid stringtech killed the racquet making the top of the sweetspot way too open!
Interesting that you had a similar experience as I did. I think the thin beam does help with control but maybe the launch angle is what made it spray a little.
Based upon your review of the 200 CX, it sounds like the Blade V7 98 16x19 has a more predictable response. I think the negative with the 200 CX is the swingweight is a bit low for a player that has big groundstrokes and serve. Some lead tape at 3 and 9 or 2 and 10 would most likely bring this racquet alive IMO.
Hey I have those NB shoes! I think they look great! Thanks for this review I was wondering what your thoughts are about the Diadem flash tennis string? Thanks 👍🎾
Yes, I truly enjoy the Diadem Flash string. It is very similar to Head Hawk with a fraction of the cost. It's a really comfortable round co-poly. It really allows you to hit out on the ball if that's your style.
Either the CX200 with 3 lbs lower tension or the CX200 Tour with the same tension. Either should work better for you. With the CX200 @52 I think it's too tight, giving you a small and hot sweet spot. Going down 3 lbs will make the racquet much more friendly and more spinny.
OK, What would You recommend instead of this? Head Speed to get the pop, control and power? Or did You try play it again and put 8 g led on it and decrease preasure on the strings? I like the spces on this Dunlop.
If you still want a sense of control then I would tell you to get the Speed Pro (since it has a denser 18x20 string pattern). If you want some added pop to this Dunlop putting 3-5g of lead at the 12 or 10 and 2 positions should help with that. And then adding the tension to the mid to high 50s. It’s all just about personal preference and experimentation. But I would classify the Dunlop at more control than a speed
That’s a good question. After further thought the CX200 is a good option, I think the string j picked for the review was poor. The new Diadem Elevates are a really good option for a 98. You could also try the Pure Aero VS. incredibly headlight but allows for tons and tons of spin.
Denis Kusonovich sadly I haven’t gotten my hands on it. But I’m sure it’s a great high level control frame. The prestige’s are wonderful for higher levels
@@10sjunkies74 I'm an aggressive base liner and play 3 times a week but thanks for the help. Let me know of you have any other suggestions for strings for this racket.
I agree with ya! After revisiting the video I realize that a big portion of the uncontrollability is due to the string setup I was using but not the frame itself. From this point forward I am going to be using he same string I have for my match rackets which will help with clarity in reviews.
Yes! As I've revisited the racket and big portion of the power was coming from the string. That was my mistake with using a new string on a racket I was demoing.
I would politely disagree. As I mentioned in the video, I feel like I needed more weight on the racket to help me keep my swingspeed under control. The LS version would just make me have even less control with my swingspeed due to it being lighter than the normal CX200.
Something seems off about the quality of the video. I am going to look into this and try to fix the issue by the next video.
It looks like the frame rate is off, hence the jerky motion (not your swing 😛).
I have been playing with this racquet for a few months now, it feels great! I would say its definitely a platform racquet off the shelf, but adding weight to 3, 9, 10, 2 and also the same counter weight to the handle, then dropping down to about 48lbs with a poly, it plays like a dream. It helped me fix those short shots, added more pop behind my flat serves, and gave me a bit more access to spin. The only down side is, you need to be able to swing the racquet with that kind of added weight to it comfortably, to reap the benefits of this frame. Solid over all! I switched from the babolat pure strike family for this and I don't think i'm ever going to go back hahah! Nice review!
I’m glad that you enjoy it! Thanks for the kind words
Since you mentioned it, I think you should put together a review of the vcore 95! ;-)
Good luck with the channel.
Interesting, the tennis warehouse review said it was really low powered. Thanks for the review! I currently also use a VCore 95, but interested in a 98 sq inch head with 16 x 19 stick
Yes, compared to their other line the CX200 is the stick for those looking for power. In my personal opinion, it did feel more powerful than rackets like the blade or the pure strike. So according to the Dunlop line, it is control-based, according to other rackets I've played with it was on the higher power end. The Vcore 95 is a wonderful stick, you could take a look at something like the Blade 98 or Head Extreme if you want some more spin!
@@10sjunkies74 cool thanks man! Great channel!
6:09 wow what a shot
haha thanks!
I agree with you that the racquet sprays the ball long! I have the 18x20 cx 200 tour and that still has an unpredictable launch. In my opinion the power grid stringtech killed the racquet making the top of the sweetspot way too open!
Interesting that you had a similar experience as I did. I think the thin beam does help with control but maybe the launch angle is what made it spray a little.
Based upon your review of the 200 CX, it sounds like the Blade V7 98 16x19 has a more predictable response. I think the negative with the 200 CX is the swingweight is a bit low for a player that has big groundstrokes and serve. Some lead tape at 3 and 9 or 2 and 10 would most likely bring this racquet alive IMO.
I completely agree, I think adding some weight to those positions would help with stability and make the racket a tad bit more predictable!
Hey I have those NB shoes! I think they look great! Thanks for this review I was wondering what your thoughts are about the Diadem flash tennis string? Thanks 👍🎾
Yes, I truly enjoy the Diadem Flash string. It is very similar to Head Hawk with a fraction of the cost. It's a really comfortable round co-poly. It really allows you to hit out on the ball if that's your style.
@@10sjunkies74 Thanks I'll give it a try, I'm familiar with the Hawk string, I'll probably try it at about 53lbs in a 16x19. Appreciate 🎾
@@nathanmiller6051 for sure! let me know what you think when you get the chance to try it out!
@@10sjunkies74 will do!
Either the CX200 with 3 lbs lower tension or the CX200 Tour with the same tension. Either should work better for you. With the CX200 @52 I think it's too tight, giving you a small and hot sweet spot. Going down 3 lbs will make the racquet much more friendly and more spinny.
Good point, I have actually recently dropped my tension down. If I were to review the frame again I would probably go down to about 48lbs.
I better be getting paid for this… also 6:33 was a raw shot😂
makes my serve look terrible lmao
OK, What would You recommend instead of this? Head Speed to get the pop, control and power? Or did You try play it again and put 8 g led on it and decrease preasure on the strings? I like the spces on this Dunlop.
If you still want a sense of control then I would tell you to get the Speed Pro (since it has a denser 18x20 string pattern). If you want some added pop to this Dunlop putting 3-5g of lead at the 12 or 10 and 2 positions should help with that. And then adding the tension to the mid to high 50s. It’s all just about personal preference and experimentation. But I would classify the Dunlop at more control than a speed
I think Dunlop Srixon SX 300 LS 285gr. I tried Head Extreme. A bit too little control. This should be in between the CX and Extreme.
@@henrikbecker1305 I agree, the LS would be a good mix of the two
Which 98 racquet would you choose which had a more controlled swing and better weight distribution?
That’s a good question. After further thought the CX200 is a good option, I think the string j picked for the review was poor. The new Diadem Elevates are a really good option for a 98. You could also try the Pure Aero VS. incredibly headlight but allows for tons and tons of spin.
@@10sjunkies74 thanks, any thoughts on the new Head Prestige Pro 2021?
Denis Kusonovich sadly I haven’t gotten my hands on it. But I’m sure it’s a great high level control frame. The prestige’s are wonderful for higher levels
What strings would you recommend for this racket?
All depends on play style and amount that you play. I personally would enjoy any spin string
@@10sjunkies74 I'm an aggressive base liner and play 3 times a week but thanks for the help. Let me know of you have any other suggestions for strings for this racket.
Tyler Dao I would start out with something like hyper g soft or Dunlop explosive spin and see if those suit your play style well
Racket rewards good mechanics
I agree with ya! After revisiting the video I realize that a big portion of the uncontrollability is due to the string setup I was using but not the frame itself. From this point forward I am going to be using he same string I have for my match rackets which will help with clarity in reviews.
Would you go with this or the Tour version?
Personally I’d probably pick the tour version. But if I remember right I think it’s a 95, so keep that in mind
@@10sjunkies74 why the tour version?
Spamwand I prefer heavier frames and I would enjoy the 95 head size personally
@@10sjunkies74 I did think that, but the tour is lighter!
@@s41magazine37 oh interesting! I did not realize that. Then I would likely just customize it to a heavier spec haha
Hmm, interesting. I think it's the lowest powered racquet I've ever tried. Might be more the string than the racquet.
Yes! As I've revisited the racket and big portion of the power was coming from the string. That was my mistake with using a new string on a racket I was demoing.
I Think for You The cx 200LS...was better
I would politely disagree. As I mentioned in the video, I feel like I needed more weight on the racket to help me keep my swingspeed under control. The LS version would just make me have even less control with my swingspeed due to it being lighter than the normal CX200.
Twist weight on this frame is way too low. Unstable as f.
Hard to do a review when neither you nor your partner can hit the ball up the middle of the court.