Why China ordered its automakers to STOP plans for factories in Europe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @electricviking
    @electricviking  27 днів тому +13

    For free tickets to the show use this link and one of the promotion codes below (if one doesn't work you can try another one)
    electricviking2024,
    electricviking_sydneyevshow,
    electricvikingsunday (Sunday only) :
    www.futuredriveauto.au/syd/ev24/comp-tickets
    Click here to get a free charger and installation when pre-ordering the G6
    xpeng.com.au/?qr=726XPO
    The best solar company in Australia just installed my new solar system.
    Check them out here:
    www.resinc.com.au/electricviking

    • @TroyDegarnham
      @TroyDegarnham 27 днів тому +1

      A promotional code is necessary to get a free ticket. What is the code?

    • @MarsOzzie
      @MarsOzzie 27 днів тому

      @@electricviking still charging $35

    • @LK-jl3pc
      @LK-jl3pc 27 днів тому

      @electricviking: Could I ask you what thoughts/research you have done regarding data collection and privacy when buying a Chinese car?

    • @youmemeyou
      @youmemeyou 26 днів тому

      Thank God, China is now growing some balls to say no to the hegemonic EU!

    • @orionxtc1119
      @orionxtc1119 23 дні тому +1

      China has bought up so many European electronic and engineering companies...

  • @chillstep4life
    @chillstep4life 27 днів тому +245

    I find it ironic EU slaps tariffs on Chinese EV for "overcapacity" when the entire EU EV industry is like 10% market share and US and Japanese autos export more cars to EU than China does... The narrative doesn't add up

    • @tvgerbil1984
      @tvgerbil1984 27 днів тому

      They don't wait for the Chinese EVs to flood the market and decimate the European makers before they act. They know the Chinese EVs are made in mind boggling numbers and the huge price differentials are there for all to see.

    • @ifyoureadthisyouaregey8821
      @ifyoureadthisyouaregey8821 27 днів тому +4

      Chinese are like half price

    • @AngelIliev-de1zp
      @AngelIliev-de1zp 27 днів тому +7

      @@ifyoureadthisyouaregey8821 More like 10-20% discount compared with Japanese.

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 26 днів тому +3

      Japan is a country like Germany in ideology. Hail! So Japanese cars are fine.

    • @christopherchen6170
      @christopherchen6170 26 днів тому +3

      @@AngelIliev-de1zp because of your tariffs

  • @danieldornes8416
    @danieldornes8416 27 днів тому +264

    Sales of western ICE cars in China have already been collapsing before any tariffs. Sales of those large-engined ICE cars will quickly dwindle to nothing with or without any Chinese government tariffs.

    • @teklife
      @teklife 27 днів тому +13

      but all of the other stuff china buys from europe, that matters. china is a huge market, therefore, they have leverage

    • @hackbrettschorsch6855
      @hackbrettschorsch6855 27 днів тому +5

      There are already import tariffs on ICE cars in China. Almost up to 50 %.

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 27 днів тому +10

      Yes ICE cars are pretty obsolete, and most Chinese buyers has already grasped that.
      But the purpose of putting taxes on them is to give a signal the EU and the US..
      By the way, it isn't about imported ICE cars. Most of them nowadays are built in China.

    • @hackbrettschorsch6855
      @hackbrettschorsch6855 27 днів тому +2

      @@larsnystrom6698 China already has tariffs on ICE cars up to almost 50 %…

    • @spartagonmaciste
      @spartagonmaciste 27 днів тому +15

      @@hackbrettschorsch6855 Source? It seems you made it up...

  • @leqiaop1840
    @leqiaop1840 22 дні тому +21

    Chinese become angry not simply because of Tariffs rather the EU policy has clearly shown discrimination against chinese. Tesla EV (everyone inside China knows that Tesla got lots of subsidies benefits from chinese local government) has only 9% tariff while chinese owning car brands need pay at least 17% (up to 35% depends on cooperation form). With other words, it is not pure business trade conflict anymore. The EU mixed their ideology into it.

  • @walid7885
    @walid7885 26 днів тому +46

    They found another alternative. Tunisia and Morocco. Highly educated people and willing to work with China.

  • @DC-qn4wz
    @DC-qn4wz 27 днів тому +247

    It's called "incentives" here in the US/Europe, and "illegal subsidies" in other countries.
    It’s called “high productivity” here, and “overcapacity” there.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 27 днів тому +6

      Its called truthspeak.

    • @timbehrens9678
      @timbehrens9678 27 днів тому +3

      Incentives for buyers, not manufacturers. Big difference.

    • @holmis71dedmit
      @holmis71dedmit 27 днів тому +16

      So GM and other US manufactures didnt get help some years ago?

    • @SaretGnasoh
      @SaretGnasoh 26 днів тому +25

      @@timbehrens9678 lol, you are so naive for not knowing manufacturers in Europe also receive incentives from government

    • @krasserTerror
      @krasserTerror 26 днів тому +4

      @@wolfgangpreier9160 Double plus good comment!

  • @jluis333
    @jluis333 27 днів тому +111

    China is a powerhouse for electronics and now evs. Europe is good for tourism and food/booze. Why the war?

    • @mijmijrm
      @mijmijrm 27 днів тому

      Europe is also world beating at pompous superiority

    • @Zerpentsa6598
      @Zerpentsa6598 26 днів тому +5

      Good for tourism? Venice and many Spanish provinces are telling tourists to go away.

    • @chewkiatyong
      @chewkiatyong 26 днів тому

      EU prioritizes the warmongering and supremacist agendas of US.
      EU taxpayers have been shortchanged, with tax monies going to bombs and bullets for ongoing bloodshed instead of alleviating own citizens' poverty and maintaining the economy.
      Quite unfortunate that EU and US does not believe in peaceful collaborative progress, but instead chose to pursue a war-based supremacist agenda.

    • @brulsmurf
      @brulsmurf 26 днів тому +6

      the car industry means millions of high paying jobs in Europe. We like money.

    • @daveblack5109
      @daveblack5109 26 днів тому +6

      @@brulsmurf Yes over 14 million work in the European auto industry it accounts for 6% of European employment and 8% of the manufacturing capacity. EU auto makers didn't want the tariffs as they saw where it would end..

  • @mydogsbutler
    @mydogsbutler 26 днів тому +82

    Europe didn't mind selling European cars in China for decades without tariffs. Europe brought this on itself though excessive tariffs. Rather than cooperate with trade it decided to follow American protectionism. Can't blame the Chinese for responding like this. Any other country would have done the exact same if another country set up trade barriers while expecting its own exports not to face them.

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому +5

      Bad analogy. China had no industry and China welcomed this. Besides, many of those cars were built in China, and this is how China got the know-how. China could have prevented this war. They chose not to because they have their eyes on Taiwan.

    • @mydogsbutler
      @mydogsbutler 26 днів тому +6

      @@andrezcabara2774 Bad reasoning. If someone is going to claim it's okay to export something or build plants in someone else's country they need to offer the same courtesy back.

    • @mydogsbutler
      @mydogsbutler 26 днів тому +12

      @@andrezcabara2774 btw - The Taiwan issue is a red herring. America and Europe agreed to one China policy decades ago. It's not such a stretch seeing as Taiwan was part of China before the start of the cold war when America militarily backed the partition. Are there any Chinese bases backing the partition of Texas from the US? Far as I can tell its America not China with hundreds of military bases around the world no?

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому +3

      @@mydogsbutler Yes, you're correct. However, Germany voted against tariffs, it was other European countries. The reason China is in such a good position is because other countries created factories in China. This is how China got the know-how. Europe did not get the know-how from China.

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому +3

      ​@@mydogsbutler Bad analogy using Texas. Texas is part of the USA and are integrated. Taiwan is not and its people have voted not to be ruled by China. See how your analogy doesn't "stick"?
      And, no, Taiwan is not a red herring. China knows it would be "strange" to go against Russia on the invasion of Ukraine when China has intentions to take Taiwan by force. Or what do you call those military maneuvers? Would it be fair if China lets Taiwan choose if they want to join China or be independent? What do you say?
      Your mention of "hundreds of US military bases" is a red herring, as it's not relevant.

  • @limonade2684
    @limonade2684 27 днів тому +283

    I am from Germany. I am shocked, how dumb we act. Germany was against the tarrifs, because they knew, what will happen. Our arrogance is been punished.

    • @sword7872
      @sword7872 27 днів тому +56

      More shocking is the end of cheap Russian gas for Germany. Why would Chinese factories want to set up shop in Europe when cost of production there is much higher?

    • @MultiMenvafan
      @MultiMenvafan 27 днів тому

      Germany is the worst culprit by going all in on trade with China and Russia. The ICE industry in China is max 5 years away from ultimate collapse.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 27 днів тому +6

      Yes

    • @eabellamy1
      @eabellamy1 27 днів тому

      They are against the tarifs because of the short term thinking that has brought them to the hole they are in right now. ICE is dead, it just doesn't know it yet, and the only way is to create a home grown or imported EV ecosystem and tarifs will help to foster. Germany needs to get off its stupid austerity dogma, invest in their shitty infrastructure to begin with, and on R&D to compete instead of nostalgia of an unsustainable, misguided industrial past.

    • @schrimpf
      @schrimpf 27 днів тому

      Germany is a obedient U.S. vasall.
      The follow the orders from the U.S. even for the price for total economic destruction.

  • @camhaothi8400
    @camhaothi8400 27 днів тому +369

    Chinese says: if you don't want a win win than you get a lose lose 👎😑🇺🇸

    • @markfinch2016
      @markfinch2016 27 днів тому +9

      Win, win, yeah right it's called a Monopoly 😂

    • @camhaothi8400
      @camhaothi8400 27 днів тому

      @@danielb7253 poop my ass I from Vietnam and some Chinese products is very good and a lot cheaper than your product 😑

    • @camhaothi8400
      @camhaothi8400 27 днів тому

      @@danielb7253 poop products my ass I from Vietnam and some Chinese products is very good and a all cheaper than you products 😑

    • @camhaothi8400
      @camhaothi8400 27 днів тому +2

      Ok who is the one that is shadow ban me what is you two 🤬

    • @davidnika446
      @davidnika446 27 днів тому +22

      @@danielb7253 If they're "dumping" their products, and their products are poo, what do yo have to say about the citizens who decide to buy them? They don't have to buy them, and few will buy if it's not worth it.

  • @nicholasglade4572
    @nicholasglade4572 27 днів тому +195

    I am sick of the tariffs in the US to protect over paid union workers and bad auto company management. I can't buy a inexpensive car in the US anymore as a result.

    • @MarsOzzie
      @MarsOzzie 27 днів тому +17

      Tesla is non union

    • @vestasharp6861
      @vestasharp6861 27 днів тому +14

      Same here in Canada. Over $70k for Tesla Y is insane.

    • @MarsOzzie
      @MarsOzzie 27 днів тому +3

      @@vestasharp6861 it's 60k in Australia 55k CAD

    • @davidgmaloof
      @davidgmaloof 27 днів тому

      So you're fine watching another million middle class jobs move to China just so you can drive a cheap car. You are part of the problem.

    • @timwhite8500
      @timwhite8500 27 днів тому +7

      And it doesn’t matter who you vote for sounds like more of the same behaviour.

  • @knutbergan
    @knutbergan 26 днів тому +59

    I am happy that Norway is not part of EU and thus there are no punitive tariffs on any Chinese built cars, at least for the moment.

    • @WanderingSword
      @WanderingSword 21 день тому +7

      Norway is a little country in Europe. It's not as sovereign as it likes to think.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 19 днів тому +4

      Norway's ability to buy electric cars is entirely underwritten by being a petrostate.

    • @alxdava2004
      @alxdava2004 18 днів тому +3

      Norway will do what EU dictates. Exactly like Switzerland. That's why you're now in NATO: to do what you're told.

    • @CTownsend31
      @CTownsend31 12 днів тому

      Norway is eu slave

  • @SilverforceX
    @SilverforceX 25 днів тому +91

    The EU needs to stop being a loyal dog of America & Israel and think about the welfare of its own citizens.

    • @georgejesson1944
      @georgejesson1944 19 днів тому +8

      They aren't allowed to

    • @syriacode8602
      @syriacode8602 18 днів тому

      china was always good to every country in the world, they don't have any agenda, USA doesn't like that they want the power for themselves, this is not new, the war on communication and computing was on, Huawei sanctions and other companies, the 3nm technology also they want it to be just USA and other stuff, they are the devil.

    • @paulc6766
      @paulc6766 18 днів тому

      Not relevant in this case.

    • @lindenimotsumi8641
      @lindenimotsumi8641 17 днів тому +4

      @@paulc6766 It is extremely relevant, Sir/Ma’am. The reason why the EU is in this mess is because it has been ‘manipulated’ by the US, with the US itself being ‘manipulated’ by Israel.

    • @wantrevize
      @wantrevize 17 днів тому +1

      @@paulc6766 as relevant as your opinion ever were. buy some newspaper and magazine and learn to read. yt shorts arent the place to gather wisdom.

  • @sunshinesun121
    @sunshinesun121 27 днів тому +64

    As an INVESTOR of Xpeng, NIO, etc ................ They are spending on " HIGH RISK and LOW RETURN " in EU. Already EU parliament and various countries are putting up various BARRIERS against Chinese Trade. Not a GOOD and RIGHT time to " EXPAND into (Hostile) countries " . Play SAFE and WAIT . Currently EU is going through a significant financial crisis and economic stagnation. So WHY expand there ???

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 27 днів тому +1

      But isn't it to circumvent tariffs? 🤔

    • @ethelthecat1
      @ethelthecat1 27 днів тому

      Following sanctions on Russian companies, assets, banks and Forex China suspects that if the EU doesn't come to its senses and do what is right for Europe, tariffs will be just the start and will follow with US instructions to seize Chinese owned ports, factories and retail sites. They've done it already to Russia so China is probably trying to get the EU to see sense, before it gives up on the EU and concentrates on exports to ASEAN, AFRICA and South American markets, which will total millions of cars per annum and give Chinese car manufacturers growth whilst waiting for the EU to come to its senses.

    • @henkjan673
      @henkjan673 27 днів тому

      @@abraxastulammo9940 The risk is that EU add new barriers after the factories are already in the EUor maybe even confiscate the assets in EU. They already demonstrated they do this to Russia so it could happen to China in the future.

    • @cherryq91
      @cherryq91 27 днів тому

      Are you stupid? Chinese market has been always hostile. What EU is doing is returning with the same coin. It is still not as drastic as it should be to level it up.

    • @LittleBoobsLover
      @LittleBoobsLover 26 днів тому

      because chinese manufacturers are more customer oriented? They have better tech for lower price? Hundreds of different models?

  • @michaelgfyau4514
    @michaelgfyau4514 27 днів тому +42

    In my country today. We could just spend 100 over thousand to buy a Chinese car with similar specs and performance as a 300 over thousand BMW. So it's become a matter of choice instead if you are choosing specs or brand.

    • @coolbanana165
      @coolbanana165 24 дні тому +1

      Can they just stop fighting and let China make cheap stuff like they do best?
      Europe should take advantage of that and scale the green economy quickly with Chinese goods.

  • @martinhovorka69
    @martinhovorka69 27 днів тому +159

    Very reasonable decision from China side, IP theft risk and confiscations via huge tariffs make little sense for China to take the risk investing in Europe. China will not accept being pushed around. China needs Europe but Europe needs China even more for literally everything.

    • @Lee-pf6od
      @Lee-pf6od 27 днів тому +11

      China is reliant on their massive trade surplus, making them just as vulnerable - especially if US turns the screws at the same time

    • @aslampervez2294
      @aslampervez2294 27 днів тому +22

      ​@@Lee-pf6odusa has played most of its card already

    • @trouble_withda_name6558
      @trouble_withda_name6558 27 днів тому

      IP theft made China's industry what it is today 😂

    • @bubuneowoo6161
      @bubuneowoo6161 27 днів тому

      When China stops accepting USD, the dollar will be worth toilet paper.

    • @tdn4773
      @tdn4773 27 днів тому +11

      China needs overseas markets. that is its weakness.

  • @johanstjern4118
    @johanstjern4118 26 днів тому +7

    This is probably the real reason why the BYD factory in Hungary keeps getting delayed from starting construction?

  • @naga2015kk
    @naga2015kk 27 днів тому +40

    BATTLEGROUND is now set.

  • @shencheanglow3726
    @shencheanglow3726 26 днів тому +8

    EU forget 80% of people live outside western world. Once their development is raised there will be much less for them if they don't cooperate. African, central Asian, Asean, central and south American would very much wanted to replace them to supply whatever chinese wanted to exchange.

  • @wanderingquestions7501
    @wanderingquestions7501 26 днів тому +9

    No point in wasting one penny in Europe. Save the investments for BRICS

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому

      You are supporting Russia's invasion of Ukraine. You know this, right?

  • @f1aziz
    @f1aziz 27 днів тому +17

    Fair enough. Gone are the days when EU used to drive hard bargain.

  • @GieZatRedLight
    @GieZatRedLight 26 днів тому +9

    European politicians have recently discovered that combustion-based cars are on the way out, and have panicked. It's a shame that they, and all European car manufacturers, have slept through the hour - for 10 years!

  • @WebAccount-y3e
    @WebAccount-y3e 26 днів тому +10

    👌👌The ban on ICE cars in China probably won't be reversed as the country (unlike the rest of the world) is actively moving to make a total switch to EVs. It's also important to note, the ban is not just on European ICE cars, it's all cars, including those produced by Chinese manufacturers. In a way, unlike the EU and US tariffs on China, these retaliatory measures are not focused on one manufacturer or country. Pretty smart tbh.❤❤

  • @coolbanana165
    @coolbanana165 24 дні тому +5

    Can they just stop fighting and let China make cheap stuff like they do best?
    Europe should take advantage of that and scale the green economy quickly with Chinese goods.

  • @sterlingarcher1962
    @sterlingarcher1962 27 днів тому +45

    This is all just simply a part of how Europe loses power and economic standing in the world along with the death of legacy auto. The shift has been ongoing for a long time, now we get to watch more openly!

    • @carlosorff
      @carlosorff 27 днів тому

      This is all caused by the hawkish war seeking European governments .Idiocracy at best.If we don't stop following the Anglo Saxon influence the EU is doomed.

    • @marianbiznesu1899
      @marianbiznesu1899 27 днів тому +2

      European / American / Japan / Korean ICE cars would lose their position in CHRL anyways. Simple because of China domestic auto makers. Those legacy auto makers would lose scale of production and profits. Second - less spectacular battle will be lost on 4th countries markets (outside CHRL, USA, EU). Chinese automakers are gaining marketshare and everybody except Tesla is losing... From one perspective it will make Europe weaker from the other legacy automakers did close to nothing to follow the electrification. 28% rate of annual growth shows the trend and faith of legacy automakers.

    • @davec110
      @davec110 27 днів тому

      Thats the thing! the EU legacy auto makers NEVER ASKED FOR THE TAX. The politicians did. The tax will accelerate their down fall especially the German brands. Nord stream was a major hit on cost of production then this. Looks like their allies going full tilt against Germany.

    • @sterlingarcher1962
      @sterlingarcher1962 26 днів тому

      @@marianbiznesu1899 the future will tell all. We shall certainly see. In the meantime it is most interesting to watch. I quite enjoyed your input, thanks for sharing. Good food for thought.

    • @kenlee1416
      @kenlee1416 21 день тому

      The future of large swathes of Europe is carpet weaving, kebabs and briyani, prayer cap and prayer book making.

  • @davidbosak7503
    @davidbosak7503 25 днів тому +5

    They have a different system in China. Instead of Venture Capitalists, the provinces and some large municipalities have investment funds. They use the investment funds to provide seed money for start-ups and expansions. They also provide free/low cost land and tax reductions, just like the West. These are all the items that the West is using as justification for the tariffs. Basically, they are punishing China because the start-up money comes from government entities instead of private Capitalists. Basically, they are punishing China for being Socialist.

  • @nics129
    @nics129 27 днів тому +11

    Why build there if it could be seize at any moment especially under current hostile trajectory from Europe

  • @trythis2821
    @trythis2821 27 днів тому +83

    Tesla with the Berlin factory will be rubbing their hand together. Whole lot of competition just got eliminated.

    • @Beatles4Sale.
      @Beatles4Sale. 27 днів тому +3

      It’s just political posturing. It will be settled imho…😂

    • @Zeta-y3c
      @Zeta-y3c 27 днів тому +26

      And Tesla and European car companies can say goodbye to the Chinese market. Maybe India can replace the huge Chinese market. Good luck.

    • @zoransarin5411
      @zoransarin5411 27 днів тому

      @@Zeta-y3c Follow the data and the numbers. China and the Chinese love Tesla. They are massacring the other Europeans and American automakers.

    • @thorbjrnhellehaven5766
      @thorbjrnhellehaven5766 27 днів тому +6

      @@Zeta-y3c But Tesla already have a factory in China. Tesla to China aren't import

    • @Zeta-y3c
      @Zeta-y3c 27 днів тому

      @@thorbjrnhellehaven5766 if you have been to China, you'd know Tesla will be in some serious trouble. They offer very little compared to brands like Zeeker, Nio, Li Auto, XPeng and others. If Musk continues to offer stuff all and play politics, you can guarantee consumers will rise up and ignore the brand, like they have with other brands and products. With Musk tied to Trump today, the day is coming, Shanghai Giga factory or not.

  • @moriwaki80
    @moriwaki80 24 дні тому +4

    2:40 says China does not tax European vehicles in China.
    I looked it up "The Global Times first reported late last month that a Chinese government-affiliated auto research centre was suggesting China raise its import tariffs on imported gasoline sedans and sport utility vehicles with engines larger than 2.5 litres to 25%, from the current rate of 15%"

    • @MuJiankui-kz2ex
      @MuJiankui-kz2ex 13 днів тому

      This is the difference between China and Europe. Even Chinese companies producing large-displacement cars in China have to bear high taxes, and equal treatment is most important.

  • @linhai7966
    @linhai7966 27 днів тому +49

    China should tax Airbus for its state subsidies too.

    • @bricolagefantasy7291
      @bricolagefantasy7291 27 днів тому +2

      No way. They dont have strong enough jet market. They also still pressing boeing.
      10 yrs from now maybe.

    • @lowiq3409
      @lowiq3409 27 днів тому +4

      They can and rhen fly on their own planes

    • @bricolagefantasy7291
      @bricolagefantasy7291 27 днів тому +2

      @@lowiq3409 they have 320 class and building 350 class. By sexond generation, they are ready to compete.

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 27 днів тому +2

      ​@@bricolagefantasy7291
      They'll only compete within China.

    • @bricolagefantasy7291
      @bricolagefantasy7291 27 днів тому +3

      @@marcg1686 c919 will get european license. Airbus was laughed at when first flown, now they are on top of boeing.
      Comac has money and human resource. 10 yrs is eternity to chinese industry.
      They only need to compete with currently in drawing board airbus plane, and non existance boeing next gen plane.
      Engine they are already at parity will probably win against pnw soon. Cheaper price same performance...

  • @stefanatchia2467
    @stefanatchia2467 27 днів тому +1

    Very interesting. Great reporting. Thanks

  • @leerizer
    @leerizer 27 днів тому +8

    Tax to ICE larger than 2.5l Italian will experiencing deep impact as well.

  • @moss550
    @moss550 25 днів тому +4

    My guess is the Chinese will eventually allow to investment to continue, but only in EU countries that voted against the tariffs. Whereas countries that voted for tariffs likely can't even supply components to these factories.
    This will most likely shift the automotive landscape of EU in a decade, with eastern Europe becoming the center for budget and midrange cars manufacturing. Meanwhile Fiat, Peugeot, Renault and the like will see their sales plummet.

  • @Urbizzo
    @Urbizzo 25 днів тому +3

    The Electric Car market, has plummeted in Europe. A big miscalculation - The car makers were happy to make these cars, because the price was twice than ordinary combustion engine cars. But now people can't afford them. And they have discovered that Electric Vehicles have lost the used car values - so people are going back to combustion engines. (1/3 of Germany's EV customs has gone back to combustion).
    Few years ago Europe Union stopped Chinese solar panels! (They said the panels were too cheep, because China had used subsidiaries).

  • @normansippel6553
    @normansippel6553 26 днів тому +1

    Well said, there are no winners when high tariffs start being slapped on.

  • @MarsOzzie
    @MarsOzzie 27 днів тому +20

    Theres plenty of non euro countries still

    • @hitmanhart6275
      @hitmanhart6275 26 днів тому +1

      There are plenty of non chinese ice cars!

  • @steveknowles9871
    @steveknowles9871 27 днів тому +14

    Free Trade ! Never really existed 😅

    • @HTeo-og1lg
      @HTeo-og1lg 27 днів тому +2

      It was true for more than 60 yrs. Until the "fair trade" propaganda mantra started in the mid 1980s when Japan products started out competing in the US market.

    • @botondtoth8263
      @botondtoth8263 27 днів тому

      ​@@HTeo-og1lg No, it hadn't been free even before that. Japan has alwayy protected its market. China has had restrictions too.

    • @Freedom_from_imp
      @Freedom_from_imp 25 днів тому +1

      Free trade when you are subsidizing your industries and winning. Unfair practice when someone else uses your play book against you. 😅

    • @botondtoth8263
      @botondtoth8263 25 днів тому

      @@Freedom_from_imp Mind you, it's true to almost every country - including China.

    • @yzy8638
      @yzy8638 22 дні тому

      @@botondtoth8263 most countries dont have the luxury of looting half of the world to build up industries, they rely on policy to push forward industry planning, and incentives, subsidy are part of such policy.
      the problem for china is that they too outpaced the superior aryan race of europe, so we see the typical bad mouthing, dirt throwing, and WMD style accusation throw at china.
      funny how unchristian the christiandom of europe became LOL at its finest.

  • @godzillamothra5983
    @godzillamothra5983 27 днів тому +7

    It is fair, as simple as that

    • @syang7775
      @syang7775 22 дні тому

      Is it fair to the customers?

  • @ianburnett4605
    @ianburnett4605 27 днів тому +64

    I have my Chinese car that will last the rest of my days and China is by far the best country at manufacturing,

    • @markfinch2016
      @markfinch2016 27 днів тому

      @@ianburnett4605 China 🇨🇳 is the Best country for Intellectual Property Theft you mean....lol 😆

    • @robinwhitebeam4386
      @robinwhitebeam4386 26 днів тому

      Nothing made in China lasts very long in the UK. Poor quality materials , design and production techniques.

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому

      I have a Chinese car too. And I've met many Chinese people who are great people. However, I wish China did not vote "Neutral" regarding Russia's aggression. China could have stopped this war, but they let it happen because they will target Taiwan.

    • @BACA01
      @BACA01 26 днів тому

      I doubt that it will last for the rest of your days, because China is the best country at cutting corners and fooling customers, and their cars rust and crack within 5 years.

    • @tonygrant3062
      @tonygrant3062 25 днів тому

      They voted neutral because they are not a natural enemy of Russia, and didn't want to side with usa and zelensky who is a usa puppet

  • @the1onlynoob
    @the1onlynoob 27 днів тому +7

    American trade war: we are going to stop you from trading with the world, isolate you, starve you out of resources.
    Chinese trade war: we will just pull our investments and development programs out. you do your thing by yourself.

    • @tigading2177
      @tigading2177 24 дні тому

      Basically US policies are based offensive, just like their war strategies, "shock and awe", sledgehammer to crush everything regardless.
      Chinese policies are based on defensive, measured response.

  • @userthehope
    @userthehope 20 днів тому

    Now we are learning our place... it's so unbelievable...what the "Ampel" create 😭🤯

  • @mechannel7046
    @mechannel7046 27 днів тому +18

    Good. Glad the Chinese are fighting back

  • @60beats44
    @60beats44 26 днів тому

    Lucky, the sale of porches here in Australia has not decreased. Still going strong just as backyard swimming pools.

    • @astafford8865
      @astafford8865 25 днів тому

      They use Porsches as backyard swimming pools? Very novel idea

    • @60beats44
      @60beats44 25 днів тому

      @@astafford8865 No, a Porsche to drive and a porch to sit in.

  • @Beatles4Sale.
    @Beatles4Sale. 27 днів тому +21

    Europe has lost the Chinese auto market in China anyway. The EU puts protectionism in place until the European companies can compete. It happened with charging stations. It’s happening with full self driving. Finally it’s happening with the cost of manufacturing and retail sales of cars. Business as usual in the EU. ❤😂❤

    • @botondtoth8263
      @botondtoth8263 27 днів тому +2

      As if China hasn't done the same...

    • @muradabdel-karim3636
      @muradabdel-karim3636 27 днів тому

      Can you elaborate? ​@@botondtoth8263

    • @Beatles4Sale.
      @Beatles4Sale. 26 днів тому +1

      @@botondtoth8263 no disagreement from me. 😂👍👍

  • @prjackson7802
    @prjackson7802 27 днів тому +1

    Great video.

  • @InformedKiwi
    @InformedKiwi 27 днів тому +5

    The lucrative sales Western Auto has had in China is coming to an end anyway. China is already over 50% new energy vehicles and growing fast. The remaining ICE car sales are plummeting and will continue to do so. Western auto has little of interest to offer in EVs and their Chinese sales are mostly ICE cars. A bleak future in China for western auto (Japan, Europe and the U.S.)

    • @iqbang9236
      @iqbang9236 26 днів тому +1

      One of the reasons that so many Chinese turn to EVs is the petrol price is so damn high. Their salary is a fraction of their Western counterparts but the oil prices are the same. It's a no-brainer.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 26 днів тому +1

      @@iqbang9236 Same thing in Africa, LatAm, and SEA - USD driving oil prices up makes gasoline an expensive import compared to domestic renewable electricity for EVs.

  • @lawrencepak1917
    @lawrencepak1917 26 днів тому +1

    Power of the money!

  • @antiproxygrifters
    @antiproxygrifters 27 днів тому +18

    Thats why Ursula is in Serbia throwing money at them, No Lithium, nothing left for Euro but Tourists.

    • @williamrogers1219
      @williamrogers1219 27 днів тому +5

      Some European places complain of over-tourism such as Barcelona, Greece, and Italy.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 27 днів тому +7

      @@williamrogers1219 OK just limit the visas but watch the tourist money go away to other places.

    • @dzonikg
      @dzonikg 27 днів тому

      I will say that our Serbian government is blind and corupted to core.
      it is absolutely crazy that we sign that Lithium goes exclusively to the Germans.
      It's as if this government has blinds on eyes and plugs in its ears and doesn't see who is and who will be the biggest player with electric cars.
      The Germans absolutely certainly will not open Mercedes or BMW electric factories in Serbia, they just want cheap Lithium and that is it so they dont polute own rivers and nature .But the Chinese WOULD OPEN perhaps not one but several factories of various brands because they are now in the process of expansion outside their borders.
      Once again, Serbia will miss a chance that comes along once ,but politicans will fill their pockets with who knows how much bribes

  • @MetaView7
    @MetaView7 26 днів тому +2

    *Porsche sells more sports cars in China than in the USA.*
    Some BMW and Mercedes are made in China, but every single one of the Porsche is made in Europe !!!

    • @BACA01
      @BACA01 26 днів тому

      Are the Porsche Evs also made in Europe?

  • @BBai-e6z
    @BBai-e6z 27 днів тому +8

    Simple, it is called "collective bargaining". China does not want "traitors" to negotiate with Europe individually. It is actually quite reasonable request from their government.

  • @BollaSandor
    @BollaSandor 26 днів тому

    To own a car is luxury nowdays, effective costs of upkeep and repair in a year is worth a cost of a good holiday

  • @bananacabbage7402
    @bananacabbage7402 27 днів тому +5

    China seem to be under the misapprehension that the EU wants them to build factories in Europe. Obviously the EU are just going to say "thanks, this will protect our own car makers" To hell with net zero and cheaper advanced cars for EU citizens. The Chinese market is already a lost cause for Legacy auto. However the Chinese will still enter the EU market with assembly factories in Turkey and Morocco.

    • @Loanshark753
      @Loanshark753 27 днів тому +1

      The EU probably wants to capture profits as well as wages and expertise.

    • @muradabdel-karim3636
      @muradabdel-karim3636 27 днів тому

      They won't, not anymore, eu has already been profiting for the past 5 decades, China has been very reasonable till now actually​@@Loanshark753

    • @matthewsocal2540
      @matthewsocal2540 26 днів тому +3

      The EU is doomed. Their engineers couldn't even dominate this market that should have been a cake walk. Sadly, there is no such thing as EU engineering in modern vehicles. Even Volvo went with Chinese engineering for ALL of their EV models. EU hasn't anything to offer.

    • @muradabdel-karim3636
      @muradabdel-karim3636 26 днів тому +2

      @@matthewsocal2540 very true, I drove a rental Mercedes EV a few weeks back while on a business trip in Germany, an eqa which is not cheap, but possibly the cheapest in their line up and I can say, Chinese EVs are probably much better even the low cost one (having driven the byd atto3 and the Qin plus, amongst the least priced in byd line up)

  • @coala1980
    @coala1980 23 дні тому

    I bet Turkey,Brazil,Russia and some other developing nations will be happy to hear this news.

  • @andrewwhittaker43
    @andrewwhittaker43 27 днів тому +11

    Politics goes both ways!

    • @davidgmaloof
      @davidgmaloof 27 днів тому +1

      Indeed...dealing with China, Inc is like dealing with the mafia.

    • @alexanderchristopher6237
      @alexanderchristopher6237 27 днів тому +2

      @@davidgmaloof that’s what it likes for dealing with the West for centuries.

    • @yzy8638
      @yzy8638 22 дні тому

      @@davidgmaloof the mafia is calling others mafia, what a new twist of things.

  • @matthewgilmore2025
    @matthewgilmore2025 26 днів тому +2

    Sam, Not sure if you covered it in any detail about the 10s of billions being invested by US auto manufactures in EV & battery mfg plants in Ga., Tn, Ky. Hyundai is also building a masdive plant and some of the US companies have teamed up with Chinese companies. So if a 45% EU tariff shuts down investment and joint ventures in Europe, why is it having no impact on US joint ventures? Hyundai should be building vehicles by the end of 2025. Also, one of the big 3 is working on making its own LFP batteries. This US tariff is giving the US mfgs a last life line. Maybe, just maybe, they see the writing on the wall?

    • @dylanthomas12321
      @dylanthomas12321 21 день тому

      The IRA is driving all the battery investment, semiconductors, etc.

  • @vicmigo
    @vicmigo 27 днів тому +33

    Chinese leaders think strategically and long term. Setting up EV factory in Europe and USA risk losing its technology knowhows.

    • @rikuperry2792
      @rikuperry2792 27 днів тому +5

      I wonder where the knowhows have come 😂😂🤣🤣

    • @streetman6661
      @streetman6661 27 днів тому +6

      @@rikuperry2792 the most advanced EV and battery knowhows definitely did not come from europe or the US.🤣🤣🤣

    • @rikuperry2792
      @rikuperry2792 26 днів тому

      @@streetman6661 they copied EU/US cars for decades and still cant make a car that would sell well in EU/US, battery tech is probaply the only thing they have

    • @BACA01
      @BACA01 26 днів тому

      @@streetman6661 Chinese learned to make EVs from Tesla.

    • @vicmigo
      @vicmigo 25 днів тому

      @@rikuperry2792 That you can ask the CEO of FORD!

  • @ArturoTorras
    @ArturoTorras 26 днів тому

    thanks

  • @martinvidenovic5767
    @martinvidenovic5767 27 днів тому +3

    Quality always finds a market. Europe, that is, cars produced in Europe do not have the quality they had twenty or more years ago. Mercedes used to cover a million kilometers, but today they can't even cover a hundred thousand. VWs fall apart, screeches when leaving the factory, etc. There is simply no quality that existed and then the main role is played by the price, where European cars cannot compete with Chinese ones. The drive to constantly reduce costs at the expense of quality has led to the sale of vehicles whose wheels do not turn and airplanes that cannot fly. Consumer policy has come to pay. Companies have to provide quality and not just appearance, because today nobody will pay for a brand of car, phone, TV if it does not have quality, and they can get the same product of the same quality from a non-name manufacturer for a lower price. European car manufacturers can get back into the race if they bring an electric car that can cover a longer distance but the right one with a single charge. If they are not able to do that or make some revolutionary progress in production, they better reorient themselves to the production of other things or they will slowly go down in history.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 26 днів тому +1

      German cars started becoming bad more than 20 years ago. My E60 5er had such terribly cheap soft rubberized trims. It's not hard for a Chinese car to do better.

  • @gj91471
    @gj91471 27 днів тому

    Great.

  • @glyngreen538
    @glyngreen538 27 днів тому +6

    Great! Hope China win this and force the reduction of trade barriers. We need as much EV adoption as possible globally as soon as possible.

  • @HappyDT
    @HappyDT 26 днів тому

    NICE

  • @Percy-c5v
    @Percy-c5v 27 днів тому +3

    I’m getting the feeling a compromise will be reached. Don’t forget the tariffs are variable depending on which Chinese company makes which car. If the prices are on a level playing field. (With companies such as Renault for example) then that might work. VW, I’m not so sure, they’re not competitive enough. If they put tariffs on Pork and brandy that’s going to be a killer here in France. Absolutely correct. No winners in a trade war.

  • @patrickfrancis7558
    @patrickfrancis7558 19 днів тому +1

    This is what happens when politicians try to act smart and act like businessmans.
    Eu should have just came up with a policy that any foreign car maker entering the country needs to have a join venture with a local manufacturer or sales/distributor at a certain percentage. In this way it keeps domestic currency within the country and protects the local industry and jobs.. It will be a win win situation for the local car industry as well
    The stupid way of EU & US using tariffs or duty to protect your local economy used in the 80s & 90s doesnt work anymore

  • @PeterJamieson-h2p
    @PeterJamieson-h2p 27 днів тому +7

    I smell a VW buyout.

    • @sokolum
      @sokolum 26 днів тому

      I am for sure that China dont care for VW anymore, VW is an overrated company. Their production design is from yesterday. Look at Tesla, only they can win. Although i do t like their current models so much, to spartanic.

  • @BWong1234
    @BWong1234 20 днів тому +2

    The winner is China since you said China holds the card.

  • @jorgseifert4712
    @jorgseifert4712 27 днів тому +3

    The tariffs would become ineffective if the cars are produced in Europe. Chinese car manufacturers could make a lot of sales. That can't actually be the reason.

    • @MrJMHP
      @MrJMHP 27 днів тому +2

      China doesnt want to follow Japan example in the 90s when japanese automakers build the factories in US to avoid tarrifs. China needs to export the maximum goods to others so they can fix their broken real estate market and their economy and also slow down their increasingly growth of debt.

    • @randygraham926
      @randygraham926 27 днів тому

      @@MrJMHP China doesn't want to risk the EU stealing their factories like they stole Russia's 300 billion. Can't be too careful when you're dealing with Europeans.
      China is more than happy to build factories in other countries -- if they can TRUST the other countries. BYD, for example, is building a plants in both Mexico and Turkey.
      Since EU decided they want a trade war, Chinese government has evidently decided to be prepared for the worst outcome.

    • @bubuneowoo6161
      @bubuneowoo6161 27 днів тому

      Local content laws can negate everything. Best to stay out until the trade war blows over.

    • @harmhoeks5996
      @harmhoeks5996 27 днів тому

      ​@@MrJMHPit's strange though. The Chinese never create factories outside China for whatever product.
      Only 'expansionist' in Indonesia/Africa to extract resources.

    • @streetman6661
      @streetman6661 27 днів тому +4

      @@harmhoeks5996 unlike western colonial powers who robbed africa blind for decades, China paid the african countries for every gram of the mineral from africa and added well paved roads for them at the same time.

  • @gilsondekazan6852
    @gilsondekazan6852 20 днів тому +1

    Here in Brazil 3 new plants of China EV. 30.000 Jobs.

  • @joe2mercs
    @joe2mercs 27 днів тому +28

    I think the idea that China called a stop to plans for building car companies in Europe as a way at getting back at Europe is wrong. The car industry was meant to be a money maker for China but it is a money pit. There are too many car companies and all are being debt financed on Chinese government backed loans. President Xi some years ago expressed the desire for car companies to consolidate. It did not happen and what we have today is lots of Chinese car companies each making fewer than quarter of million EVs, all making financial losses and looking to build factories abroad. The recent instruction is a reality check to these car companies that the Chinese government is not a bottomless pit of money.

    • @MrRobertBatchelor
      @MrRobertBatchelor 27 днів тому +1

      Is this speculation? Or you’re highly knowledgeable?

    • @turtlesoup8134
      @turtlesoup8134 27 днів тому +2

      @@MrRobertBatchelor It is true. Many Chinese ev company is suppose to go bankrupt or consolidate by now, instead each province or cities are bankrolling them further. This is because the KPI for these gov officials changed from purely GPD growth in the 80s to become more complex such as being a hub of next gen industry like EVs, Chips or AI.

    • @MrRobertBatchelor
      @MrRobertBatchelor 27 днів тому +1

      @@turtlesoup8134 Yes I know it’s true, I’m just wondering what the true narrative is.
      Chinese car companies getting reeled in by government or chinese government giving a big f you to europe?

    • @MM-sr6fw
      @MM-sr6fw 27 днів тому +7

      Do you know how long it took Tesla to become profitable? That was made possible because Tesla built the cars in China and sold lots of them to Chinese people. True competition is allowing the best companies to survive while those that can’t compete to go under. Government loans and subsidies are not unusual in your country.

    • @hclau218
      @hclau218 27 днів тому

      Wow, what a genius. China inherited so much wealth from its ancestors that it can run a money losing business for years... Repeating dumb talking points don't make you "smart", but guess that takes too much braincells for you to understand.

  • @boandersson9086
    @boandersson9086 26 днів тому +1

    In 2023, China was the third largest partner for EU exports of goods (8.8 %) and the largest partner for EU imports of goods (20.5 %), according to eurostat. What does China want?

  • @grahamf695
    @grahamf695 27 днів тому +2

    This will be fascinating. Chinese has a lot more muscle than Japan. Being one big country, it can play divided and conquer against the EU countries. The EU may find that it has grabbed a tiger by the tail. China may also be using this to fire a warning shot across the bows of the US.

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 27 днів тому

      '... grabbed a tiger by the tail.'
      Not really. They need to offload their inventory. It's a buyer's market.

    • @grahamf695
      @grahamf695 26 днів тому

      @@marcg1686 I agree that they probably have excess inventory. It's really a discussion about the consequences for legacy manufacturers and also the political consequences.

  • @stupendas101
    @stupendas101 23 дні тому

    Protectionism by government buys the automakers a little runway to stay alive, but in the long term, it makes them even less competitive than they are (and they are already in deep trouble) China will own the vehicle market in Asia, Africa and Middle East and many of the former Soviet States including most of the BRICS states

  • @pauldingwall9600
    @pauldingwall9600 27 днів тому +3

    If European car sales have decreased so much as you tell us, European cars are doomed in China anyway thus pulling out of Chinese market.

    • @randygraham926
      @randygraham926 27 днів тому

      So where are they planning to sell them? 🤣 U.S. can only buy a few at a time.....

    • @same.6409
      @same.6409 27 днів тому +2

      You are not wrong here. The fall of the European car brands in China is probably already a given. The real issue now is whether if the Chinese would build factories in EU countries and at least help them with jobs.

    • @kannolator4254
      @kannolator4254 27 днів тому

      @@randygraham926the world is sooo big

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 26 днів тому

      @@randygraham926 China is only 20% of the world's car market. Just sell in the other 80%.

    • @iqbang9236
      @iqbang9236 26 днів тому

      ... but they still make money on the Chinese market and sell these Chinese-made cars outside China.

  • @Locost59
    @Locost59 26 днів тому

    Play it right and the UK (which hasn’t imposed the tariffs) could be a beneficiary.

  • @No1careabU
    @No1careabU 27 днів тому +21

    Chinese here. European car manufacturers are already in a state of great distress in China. Let's leave them a way to survive.

    • @cs.8821
      @cs.8821 27 днів тому +1

      china ev makers are suffering financially. They barely make money. parts to make so expensive

    • @Jimmybucketzz
      @Jimmybucketzz 27 днів тому +11

      ​@@cs.8821same was said with solar a decade ago still no competition until now maybe after a century your prediction might come true. 😂

    • @kannolator4254
      @kannolator4254 27 днів тому

      Nope

    • @mydogsbutler
      @mydogsbutler 26 днів тому

      Companies like Tesla are still selling lots of cars in China. Any foreign car makers that are in great distress is because they went for the short term money of ICE rather than focus on EVs despite well knowing global warming was an important issue that needs resolution... The proverbial chicken is now coming home to roost. Western car companies claim to be for free enterprise when it suits them, then cry foul when they lose marketshare to competition? Even the subsides angle math doesn't add up since not only do they subsize their own car companies but the tariffs are far far more than Chinese subsides. Westwrn states with car companies also don't mind selling cars to other states that don't have car companies without tarrifs. If some western car companies go out of business because of rising asian competition, they only have their own incompetence to blame.
      As a western, and a consumer, I believe in fairness. If the Chinese are building better cars then us we should be able to buy them. If it puts some of our companies out of business so be it. Either we learn to swim or sink.

    • @slovackoinfo
      @slovackoinfo 25 днів тому

      There is only one foreign car manufacturer in China - Tesla. The others are Chinese companies that produce cars with foreign names. If there is a problem with cars with foreign names, then the Chinese employees will have a problem. VW does not even count the Chinese results into the group's finances.

  • @danielwong2333
    @danielwong2333 13 днів тому

    China is stepping up for a win win solution, China is not threathening anybody, it makes business sense for a fair deals. In business it is a two ways traffic, not one way only😊😊😊

  • @MASMIWA
    @MASMIWA 27 днів тому +3

    The EU is finding out that you can't kick China and not live to regret it. The EU is looking for jobs and the Chinese could provide more. Left to their own devices, the EU will have to subsidize its auto sector to give relevance and cost competitive EV autos. But on the other hand, the EU knows that the Chinese would beat the locals in cost with their factories in the EU so the EU does have a dilemma. Do they give in and wait for another day, or do they steel up and try to survive on their own?

    • @pohmoh3590
      @pohmoh3590 27 днів тому +2

      China ban export critical minerals like lithium,graphite. How EU , US going to make EVs 😂

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 27 днів тому +1

      ​@@pohmoh3590
      Very few people in the EU want to buy EVs.

    • @pohmoh3590
      @pohmoh3590 27 днів тому

      @@marcg1686 Then why afraid of Chinese EVs 😅

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 27 днів тому

      @@pohmoh3590
      It's the principle. Massive state subsidies.

    • @warb635
      @warb635 27 днів тому

      @@pohmoh3590 Lithium can be found on a lot of places. Also what about warranty on the car and garages that support Chinese EV in the EU? It takes time to settle that, certainly in a foreign market. And EVs: not everyone is a fan atm, it seems.

  • @vilester
    @vilester 26 днів тому

    China has every right to do so. EU needs to get it's act together and look at the bigger picture.

  • @juliahello6673
    @juliahello6673 27 днів тому +11

    Go China!!!! Yeah!!

  • @bjornsvensson9206
    @bjornsvensson9206 26 днів тому

    All Chinese companies are in one way or another associated with the Chinese army so for security reasons it's really good

  • @obama8888
    @obama8888 27 днів тому +21

    Because War is coming.

    • @BigBassHeavy
      @BigBassHeavy 27 днів тому

      Next year I hear. Moved it forward from 2027.

    • @daveandjanwoolf8078
      @daveandjanwoolf8078 27 днів тому

      Economically war would not benefit anyone- least of all the Chinese. Despite their military progress they are far from a match against the US. One thing we have all learned about the Chinese is they are not stupid. Sadly a much greater threat comes from the US

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому

      War is already here. China and India accepted war by not condemning Russia invading Ukraine.

    • @neverletmego6414
      @neverletmego6414 26 днів тому +3

      @@andrezcabara2774 most non-western countries in the world are not condemning Russia. Is the west going to war with the rest?

    • @andrezcabara2774
      @andrezcabara2774 26 днів тому

      @@neverletmego6414 The "West" is not going to war with anybody. The "West" is supplying arms to a country so it can defend itself. Look at UN Resolution ES-11/4:
      >> The resolution was passed with an overwhelming vote of 143 in favour, 5 against and 35 abstaining. This resolution achieved more votes in favour of condemning Russia's actions than Resolution ES-11/1, the initial resolution on the Russian invasion of Ukraine which demanded that Russia withdraw its forces from Ukraine.

  • @JianYZhong
    @JianYZhong 25 днів тому

    Maybe BYD can set up a plant in Australia!😊

    • @tigading2177
      @tigading2177 24 дні тому

      Are you serious?
      Aust is the official deputey sheriff of USA, the hate China over there!

  • @memrjohnno
    @memrjohnno 27 днів тому +6

    Nobody wins.

    • @imadkhaliq2941
      @imadkhaliq2941 27 днів тому +9

      Don't know about that but Europe definitely loses.

    • @linphilip6389
      @linphilip6389 27 днів тому

      True but the silly fairies living in Europe they can survive with handout. Let's see

    • @trythis2821
      @trythis2821 27 днів тому

      Tesla wins as they have factories in China and Europe.

    • @undisclosedthai
      @undisclosedthai 27 днів тому +2

      Chinese-product-haters in Europe win.

    • @memrjohnno
      @memrjohnno 26 днів тому

      @@undisclosedthai Foolishness... like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

  • @thecrow3461
    @thecrow3461 26 днів тому

    I'm definitely not pro-China but this is just an absolutely logical response and this will have significant impact on the energy transition and also on the economy of car building countries in Europe. China holds the cards here, Europe is in serious trouble if this goes trough. The green deal is not looking so good for the economy as predicted.

  • @georgelee6857
    @georgelee6857 25 днів тому +3

    As if not bad enough, Europe parliament lately brought the issue of Taiwan into play. How stupid are they, is beyond me

  • @milesromine9960
    @milesromine9960 25 днів тому

    Can't wait till you discover Aptera the first solar powered car.

    • @Freedom_from_imp
      @Freedom_from_imp 25 днів тому

      That car has been in development for years. I thought it went bankrupt. Did it come out ofbankruptcy?

    • @dylanthomas12321
      @dylanthomas12321 21 день тому

      ​@@Freedom_from_impIt looks like 100 percent crumple zone. American SUVs and pick-up trucks woul squash one in a wreck. I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like a child's toy.

    • @milesromine9960
      @milesromine9960 21 день тому

      @@Freedom_from_imp most cars are in development for years.

    • @milesromine9960
      @milesromine9960 21 день тому

      @@dylanthomas12321 it's exactly opposite the Imperial trash compactor. From Tesla.
      The shape is about efficiency.
      It is the most e
      Aerodynamic car ever created.

    • @Freedom_from_imp
      @Freedom_from_imp 20 днів тому

      @@milesromine9960 actually, this car has been in development since 2008, so let me correct myself. This car has been in development for more than a decade.

  • @derberserker3972
    @derberserker3972 27 днів тому +7

    GO TESLA!!!!

  • @gerritlageweg2055
    @gerritlageweg2055 26 днів тому

    Every large investment by Chinese state owned companies always has to be improved by the central government.

  • @jdreynolds29
    @jdreynolds29 27 днів тому +8

    Well I see this as a good thing as a Tesla stock investor because Tesla already has a manufacturing plant in Germany

  • @yihchiehseeto225
    @yihchiehseeto225 26 днів тому

    Ouch … don’t know why the politicians keep their citizens locked out …

  • @borisdodgingbullets
    @borisdodgingbullets 27 днів тому +3

    China has 9 other BRICS members and 36 BRICS partners to work with including 7 of the 10 most populous nations. What kind of poker hand is the EU playing with??? 😂😂😂
    Throw in the impact of retaliatory actions in China against EU country cars, brandy (LVMH’s stock has already been punished), and luxury goods (maybe next) and trade war is one that should never have been fought (by Europe).

  • @rogerjones2706
    @rogerjones2706 26 днів тому

    Isn't this what Europe wanted anyway, less Chinese cars, it saves the car industry already in Europe which gives it some time to catch up.

  • @steventan2550
    @steventan2550 27 днів тому +13

    Now it is too risky for Chinese companies to invest in countries that readily act on the behest of the US.

  • @sabb007
    @sabb007 27 днів тому +1

    I suspect that manufacturing nations in Europe will soon back out of their EU committments to change over to EVs. Unlike China, western governments can't force their citizens to buy EVs. The uptake of EVs is now stalling everywhere except for China. The early adoption phase has now effectively stopped. Very few additional buyers want EVs. Over the last 9 months in Australia Hybrids have outsold EVs by a factor of 1.5.

  • @FrankGallagherr
    @FrankGallagherr 26 днів тому +4

    Tesla is the best car company ever! No gas stations, No oil changes, No smog checks, No maintenance, Cheapest to own, Most reliable, Safest, 87% customer retention and quicker than a $650,000 Lamborghini.

  • @warb635
    @warb635 27 днів тому

    A lot of factors. Maybe, whatever EU does now in the (further) future these profits (and mainly Germany, there other countries) in China will end / diminish further anyways. So that specific Chinese leverage has also its limits.

  • @sirtng
    @sirtng 27 днів тому +8

    Europe might do a 100% tariff on Chinese cars like USA, if Europe car sales are drying in china anyway maybe they won’t care and prefer to protect there home turf first

    • @lie01234
      @lie01234 27 днів тому

      Wait they make 10 time more money in China then they do at home. Looks like China lose? Who are they going to sell to?

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 27 днів тому +4

      Kodak! Nokia!

    • @sirtng
      @sirtng 27 днів тому +1

      @@larryc1616 apple and google, fail to see your point the 99% of the mobile market is controlled by us companies. Where the commodity components and assembled is irrelevant money is in owning the platform

    • @boxtears
      @boxtears 27 днів тому +2

      Even with drying up sales, Germany is still making more money in China than Europe. So if they think that is worth sacrificing along with all the investments they were expecting from China, then I say let Europe deal with the consequences.

    • @zoransarin5411
      @zoransarin5411 27 днів тому

      @@boxtears VW and Mercedes were silently pleading with the EU not to impose tariffs as they are acutely aware that they make considerable money from China and that would be at risk.

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 26 днів тому

    may you live in interesting times....

  • @MM-sr6fw
    @MM-sr6fw 27 днів тому +2

    China has been too patient and holding back response in kind because they want to make friends instead enemies. A win, win condition for trade. Like in anything, there will be a point where the patience runs out and they have to react proportionately.

  • @laujack24
    @laujack24 27 днів тому +3

    two mercantilist dueling it out to see who can export more to one another, story as old as time. propaganda a side, there nothing the chinese can really do against europe if european dont want to be dumping ground of chinese stuff. europe buy more from china then china buy from europe in excess of 200 billions a year, while it true the german relied heavily on china for their car export and profit. reality in a direct confrontation china will lose, simply because europe buy more from them there for have the upper hand in direct trade war.
    chinese should really think a different approach instead of ttrying to dump product over sea to solve their own domestic issue, remember europe was the first to invent mercantilism and its counter tariff lol. if there any good come out of this for the european, they would have taken the deal. if they not taking these deal simply mean there nothing for them, you wasting your time arguing for the chinese side.

    • @harmhoeks5996
      @harmhoeks5996 27 днів тому

      You mean there's nothing the EU can do when it's citizens keep buying Chinese cheap copyrighted stuff.

    • @dylanthomas12321
      @dylanthomas12321 21 день тому

      I think Sam, like most Australian consumers want no tariffs on Chinese solar panels EVs, Tesla mega packs, and it makes sense, since they have no indigenous manufacturing in these arenas and are far too small to build one. But they can still export coal for generating and steel making to China. Australia is a "Western" nation -- like Japan, Korea, New Zealand -- with democracy , rule of law, property rights, independent institutions -- so it's naturally a US ally. But they have clear economic interests that rely heavily on China. So they walk a tightrope, maintaining good relations with China and the US. Any sane government would do so. It's hard for Aussies to see China through the US or EU geopolitical lens because each nation and bloc and nations within blocs have different, often competing interests. As an American I try to refrain from judging Australia too harshly vis China. Not to mention Japa and Korea, which are very much Frontline states. But they have robust manufacturing, and in autos Japan have bungled the EV transition badly. That's Sam's biggest contribution in geopolitics, just honestly covering Japan's (Toyota's), and the EU's (Germany's) utter myopia in this issue, and still to this day! We are witnessing the tragic demise of two superpowers in automating that could have transitioned like BYD has done, but chose not to.

  • @Facts..Checker
    @Facts..Checker 27 днів тому +1

    EU just made the normal practise clear... ie. Double Standard! Moreover, EU Chairwoman had also made her hardest and best decision for EU....ie. "AMERICAN FIRST" is more important! Ooops, sound right?