Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Introducing and Interpreting Karl Barth
- Додати в
- Мій плейлист
- Переглянути пізніше
- Поділитися
Поділитися
Вставка
Розмір відео:
- Опубліковано 14 сер 2024
КОМЕНТАРІ • 12
Наступне
Автоматичне відтворення
Karl Barth and IdealismReformed Forum
Переглядів 3,1 тис.
Does Consciousness Extend Beyond Brains? The 2023 Holberg Debate, feat. Seth, Luhrmann, Sheldrake.Holberg Prize
Переглядів 2,9 млн
The Gospel according to St John, read by Sir David SuchetWestminster Abbey
Переглядів 19 млн
Eleftherios Petrounias helped by Arthur Zanetti = epic gala moment ❤️Olympics
Переглядів 46 млн
Hardest Basketball Shots Ever 😳Red Bull
Переглядів 45 млн
Обман ради папы #юмор #топКостя Павлов
Переглядів 3,4 млн
Советы на всё лето 4 @postworkllcИстория одного вокалиста
Переглядів 5 млн
Greg Beale | Union with the Resurrected ChristReformed Forum
Переглядів 2 тис.
The World at War (Ralph Raico) - Libertarianism.orgLibertarianism.org
Переглядів 278 тис.
An Evening of Eschatology - Premillennialism, Amillennialism, PostmillennialismDesiring God
Переглядів 1 млн
The Psychological Drivers of the Metacrisis: John Vervaeke Iain McGilchrist Daniel SchmachtenbergerDr Iain McGilchrist
Переглядів 270 тис.
Benny Hinn's nephew confirms the worst. Here's our interview.Mike Winger
Переглядів 791 тис.
Farewell: Karl Barth and the Future of American Evangelicalism by Dr. Keith JohnsonCenter for Barth Studies
Переглядів 1,1 тис.
Naked Bible Podcast 166-168, 170 - Melchizedek (Full Version)Houseform Apologetics
Переглядів 202 тис.
The Authenticity of the Bible | Reuben A. Torrey | Christian AudiobookAneko Press - Christian Audiobooks
Переглядів 964 тис.
Would We Be Better Off Without Religion? - Christopher Hitchens [2007] ✝️ | Intelligence SquaredIntelligence Squared
Переглядів 2,4 млн
ЗСУ в Суджі надали місцевій бабусі можливість вільно висловитися про путіна #shorts #суджа #путинАпостроф TV
Переглядів 403 тис.
Зачем страны меняют флаги? #россия #ссср #новаязеландияПослезавтра
Переглядів 4,5 млн
Гордон. Что Арестович пообещал русским, армия предала Путина, Лукашенко сбежал на Запад, конец РПЦВ гостях у Гордона
Переглядів 768 тис.
⚡️ "Пятки сверкали" аж до КУРСКА! "Кадыровцы" БЕЖАЛИ, оголив фронт!FREEДOM. LIVE
Переглядів 961 тис.
ЛЕТНИЙ ДЕНЬ ТВОЕГО ДЕТСТВАSIDELNIKOVVV
Переглядів 1,5 млн
Киселев. Генералы и Лукашенко предали Путина, за Россию воевать некому, Путину конецДмитрий Гордон
Переглядів 1,3 млн
Jerry Heil & Volodymyr Dantes - ГУБИ У ГУБАХ (ПРЕМʼЄРА 2024)Jerry Heil
Переглядів 1,1 млн
Replacing a valve on a full water tank! 🫣💦 - 🎥 the_ladyplumberUNILAD
Переглядів 111 млн
Thank You for the content, very informative.
Been reading the critique of Barth in the Great Thinkers series, and just wanted to let you know the author disagrees that Christianity and Barthianisn, and Van Til specifically, represent Barth accurately. I’m sure y’all know more about the nuances on that debate more than me, but it felt like a piece of contemporary scholarship worth including! Lot of solid names, and solid interaction with primary resources.
Thanks for the comment, George. You may be interested Dr. Cassidy's newly-published, lengthy review of Dr. Tseng's contribution on Barth to the Great Thinkers. He interacts with the author on your precise point. The review is available on Reformation21.
@@rynounworthysaint very helpful, thanks!
@@rynounworthysaint thanks again! I skimmed through, and thankful. I suppose the only way to evaluate given these different schools is read Barth, and CVT on Barthianism, and think through some of the best of the secondary literature and classes like the one in the OP.
Thank you again for directing me!
Somebody that argues like an eel isn't easy to 'represent accurately'. John and Jesus did however hit the nail, when he called them 'brood of vipers'.
Thanks for the wealth of sources sited on today’s video. I’m currently reading “Church Dogmatics: A Selection with Introduction” by Helmut Gollwitzer. I’m only a third of the way through the book, but so far he paints Barth’s theology as Orthodox. Haven’t read Barth before, so his language could be nuanced and misleading. Hope to grab some of the suggested reading to work through.
Great stuff! Unrelated but you may be interested in the Feb 2023 Tabletalk from Ligonier on Machen
Very useful! Thanks!
Starts at 21:44 in, we’ll… add a couple of minutes.. no no… make that 27:40 ! Hmmm …
It may be just too simplistic to say, but given all the, what appear to me, clearly unorthodox and sub-Biblical teachings of Barth, why he was never called out as at least a false teacher? Maybe in another episode you delve into that. God's blessings, gentlemen.
Because he's actually pretty conservative compared to what else was going on in European Protestantism after WW2. Barth might even be to the theological right of Thielicke, since Barth could at least affirm some sort of inerrancy. I'd call Barth Heterodox since there is no specific heresy he has that puts him outside of the Faith and hopelessly without Christ.
He received a few angry sounding letters from Francis Schaeffer I think and Van Til was very concerned about him, my personal take is that Barth is at the least an improvement over Arminius even if it's an improvement bent out of shape by Kant.