Five facts on Double Jeopardy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2019
  • Double Jeopardy explained
    No Labels is a large and rapidly growing citizen-led organization mobilizing frustrated Republicans, Democrats and Independents - the majority of Americans - into a new political force to break the paralysis of hyper-partisanship and dysfunction in Washington. The goal is to make government work again by fighting for bipartisan, common sense solutions to our nation's biggest problems and reforms to our political system.
    Check us out on Facebook: Facebook.com/NoLabels
    Check us out on Twitter: NoLabelsOrg
    To learn more about us go to our website: nolabels.org

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @chauffeurmarco
    @chauffeurmarco 8 місяців тому +3

    Been punished twice, in the state and in federal is ridiculous. I call that double punishment anyway.

  • @enigma1863
    @enigma1863 3 роки тому +24

    Do they find people innocent? I thought they only find people not guilty.

    • @DawnDiggetyNoDoubt
      @DawnDiggetyNoDoubt 2 роки тому +3

      😒

    • @chauffeurmarco
      @chauffeurmarco 8 місяців тому

      There is no such thing in verdicts. Judges and juries say not guilty. Because in our system, which is the best but still, not perfect, it is not because they let you go that mean you didn't commit it and the other way is also true. But once they give a not guilty verdict, it is over, even if they find something new, it is over.

  • @muckman5509
    @muckman5509 3 роки тому +6

    DOUBLE JEOPARDIE!!!

  • @feelsillegal3215
    @feelsillegal3215 3 роки тому +5

    Anyone after the double jeopardy movie?

  • @YoungGwaine
    @YoungGwaine Місяць тому

    The courts making me go through trial that has been reset 3 times putting though trial on different occasions violating double Jeopardy laws

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much for this video :)

  • @kingardoin9185
    @kingardoin9185 3 роки тому +4

    She just told you the supreme Court findings: To hell with the Constitution

    • @thirdworldassassin
      @thirdworldassassin 3 роки тому

      if you dont understand what the double jeapardy clause is trying to protect then you need to do some homework because the court systems violate the double jeopardy clause everyday when someone violates their first probation thing because every court in america always illegally coerces people to waive their rights in court and take bargains in which has a hidden clause of waiving even more rights , the system is totally unconstitutional and people want to get rid of the court systems thinking that those courts are operating within constitutional law , we havent had a constitutional government since before the civil war ..... the north was constitutional during the civil war until they printed the green backs , the confederates were being directed and funded by the britith , the british had a control over the north as well , see people who want to talk about politics dont understand things like how the rhodes scholarship is for world british rule ... or other endless complexities

  • @shawns574
    @shawns574 Рік тому +4

    I had actually learned about this when we had our brief on the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
    Before I was of the belief that you could only be tried by one jurisdiction one time. But leadership informed us that if we do something dumb (such as a DWI) out in town, we can be punished both by the state and sill be NJP'd or court martialled. It would not be double jeprody because the UCMJ is it's own jurisdiction

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Do u really love me
      Is it is it pretty
      Pushing button crews
      Jack be nimble
      Jack be quick

  • @kaycisnaros5547
    @kaycisnaros5547 Рік тому +2

    Yeah I got to go off the grid for 6 months and then make a new identity

  • @AWayOfLiving84
    @AWayOfLiving84 4 місяці тому

    I've been to court about this property damage issue. I will say in one part. I went to court with the owner of property. Now about being dangerous

  • @kkmobilehose7684
    @kkmobilehose7684 2 місяці тому

    California doesn't recognize or practice this in the least.

  • @darlygalvez3279
    @darlygalvez3279 3 роки тому

    When is Jeopardy attached?

  • @kianahrwilliams1360
    @kianahrwilliams1360 Рік тому +5

    Idc, the murders of Emmit Till should’ve been sent to prison!! They were found not guilty even tho it was quite apparent they were. Then 4 months later, they admitted to it in a MAGAZINE !! With no remorse, they said they killed that 14 y/o boy and I hope they rot in hell

  • @chauffeurmarco
    @chauffeurmarco 8 місяців тому

    That is why I loved the film.

  • @markford202
    @markford202 Рік тому +1

    I just read an article about ASL (Administrative Suspension of License) as a form of Double Jeopardy. Courts have ruled that you cannot be charged Criminally and Civilly for the same office. In the case of ASL this is having your drivers license suspended on a mere DUI/DWI arrest rather than conviction. In other words you are already punished without proper due process.

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Warning deny all
      Time space harmony
      Longvtime love
      Generations crew
      Streets of gold
      Tolkien ✍️
      Modern back front
      One sky
      One god
      Dog
      Friend long time
      No eat
      Backward
      Is special to me
      Emma l9ve me
      😢
      My family tree

    • @FlexSZN23
      @FlexSZN23 9 місяців тому

      The constitutional prohibition on Double jeopardy only applies to criminal proceedings.
      You can absolutely face civil proceedings for criminal actions, examples of this are tort actions (suing for assault, wrongful death), losing license (professional, driving) or immigration (denial of benefit, loss of visa, deportation)

    • @chauffeurmarco
      @chauffeurmarco 8 місяців тому

      @@FlexSZN23 like on OJ Simpson

  • @steamynoodle2010
    @steamynoodle2010 2 роки тому +2

    Good video, but why is it filmed looking like this girl had been kidnapped and in exchange for her release she is filming boring legal videos

  • @kobanebook9888
    @kobanebook9888 3 роки тому

    Someone help i went to court in september and the case was dismissed then come November I was arrested and charged with the same crime that had beem dismissed in september now here i have court in march

  • @williampennjr.4448
    @williampennjr.4448 4 місяці тому

    When was it expanded to include cases that don't involve the death penalty, life in prison or dismemberment?

  • @mustafanazar6386
    @mustafanazar6386 2 роки тому +1

    Judge Caprio.. anyone?

  • @JessicaHart-mb7xy
    @JessicaHart-mb7xy 2 дні тому

    Im innocent and it killled me basically and my momma

  • @kaycisnaros5547
    @kaycisnaros5547 Рік тому

    Ala is mine. "don't forget the M" I mean kinky jaVa

  • @JessicaHart-mb7xy
    @JessicaHart-mb7xy 2 дні тому

    This is where u u use natural justice

  • @divijudg8279
    @divijudg8279 2 роки тому +1

    If someone was convinced of rape yet not for other serious offenses on a young childs health, like drug & alcohol abuse, is it double jeopardy if the og crime is of association.

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Warning deny all
      Time space harmony
      Longvtime love
      Generations crew
      Streets of gold
      Tolkien ✍️
      Modern back front
      One sky
      One god
      Dog
      Friend long time
      No eat
      Backward
      Is special to me
      Emma l9ve me
      😢
      My family tree

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Love u all

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Big secret name

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Blame trick star

    • @sallyredgrave1036
      @sallyredgrave1036 Рік тому

      Capatlism experimental new

  • @Based_Stuhlinger
    @Based_Stuhlinger 3 роки тому +20

    New evidence should be an exception to this. I'm all for civil liberties and the constitution, but if new evidence comes out that they may have committed a crime the accused should be tried again. I don't see why potential criminals shouldn't be challenged or even have to formulate any argument and defence against the new credible evidence.

    • @savagejack5714
      @savagejack5714 3 роки тому +6

      Ok I have a question. I know double jeopardy works with murder. So if someone dissapeared, and you were found guilty of killing the person. But the person was found alive a few years later, cant you just walk right up to her and kill her? Because he just served a few years for killing her

    • @Based_Stuhlinger
      @Based_Stuhlinger 3 роки тому +3

      @@savagejack5714 Yes, I would have thought so. Although I believe they can be charged with a related sentence such as manslaughter, even if it was blatantly murder, due to this legal catch.

    • @savagejack5714
      @savagejack5714 3 роки тому +1

      @@Based_Stuhlinger but wouldnt manslaughter be if they accidently killed them. So they would be charged for a "fake" accusation or something like that

    • @Based_Stuhlinger
      @Based_Stuhlinger 3 роки тому +1

      @@savagejack5714 They would be charged for the next heaviest crime from murder. Since the murder sentence was used last time. Double Jeopardy only affects a charge I believe meaning a different one can be used the second time.

    • @Xershade
      @Xershade 3 роки тому +5

      @@Based_Stuhlinger It actually doesn't at all, if I "murder" you on December 1st, that's a completely different crime then if I did it 'again' on December 2nd. It's why I can steal your phone one day, then do it again and be charged twice. Same thing, different times, different charges. If you killed someone but they were resuscitated later miraculously would that mean you can kill them again free and clear? Time is a factor in determining a crime, if you do the same thing twice, at different times, they're two separate actions. Just because it's not possible to double murder someone doesn't mean if you get convicted of it once you're free and clear to murder that same person again at a different date.

  • @CornerTalker
    @CornerTalker 2 роки тому

    "Gamble" is wrong - it need to be reversed.

  • @patrickpalmer3894
    @patrickpalmer3894 3 роки тому

    Please get back to me. I was found not guilty
    And a judge DA and my lawyer collaborated
    To proceed with no new evidence to ask the
    Jurors to find me guilty on a lesser charge
    Although trial was complete already with
    Not guilty of crime.

    • @you-nh8xo
      @you-nh8xo 3 місяці тому

      You're on your own homie 😂

  • @SagatClan108
    @SagatClan108 2 роки тому

    So let me get this straight. The same number case same victim same charge same date of charge. And they can't charge you for the same offense again. But if you did you did the same offense to the same person the next day is it still considered double jeopardy?
    For example: someone parks on my property. I still his car unfortunately remove it off my property. He calls the police I turn myself in. I post bail and on the same day go home and see his car parked in my property again. I do the exact same thing I steal his car he calls the cops. All understand of the 24 hours. Can they still charge me with the same exact crime twice?

    • @dwmetzger
      @dwmetzger 2 роки тому +5

      Yes. You can't be charged for the same crime twice. Stealing the car in the morning, and stealing the car in the evening, are two separate crimes. There's no rule where if you do two similar crimes really close together it counts as one crime.

  • @luisespinoza5004
    @luisespinoza5004 Рік тому +1

    Ok so let’s say I murder someone, they take it to court and I was found innocent, the next day, can I shout that I really did it and nothing will happen to me?

    • @lmjedits6662
      @lmjedits6662 Рік тому

      In theory

    • @peanutbutter801
      @peanutbutter801 Рік тому

      Im also curious about this, you ever find anything else out about this idea?

    • @Woopor
      @Woopor Рік тому

      This is why we need a real life Daredevil

    • @CatLover-gk8uu
      @CatLover-gk8uu Рік тому

      Kind of similar to what OJ Simpson did, so yes in theory.

    • @Firefly256
      @Firefly256 10 місяців тому

      Yes but good luck surviving in society, sure you might not be put in prison but no one would want to hire a murderer

  • @kaycisnaros5547
    @kaycisnaros5547 Рік тому

    To many does

  • @Nkikiavdhkfh
    @Nkikiavdhkfh 5 місяців тому

    I completely understand Double Jeopardy…However, video did nothing to clarify the law and or nuance that was added with the state/federal cases against the criminal charged. You guys made it more convoluted.

  • @UnPopular-sk7qs
    @UnPopular-sk7qs 4 місяці тому

    #IsatBuchanan

  • @phantasydragon696
    @phantasydragon696 2 роки тому +4

    Keep in mind this doesn't apply if they find new evidence but hit you with a new crime for the same incident.

    • @FlexSZN23
      @FlexSZN23 9 місяців тому

      Newly discovered evidence isn’t an exception to double jeopardy. In fact this is the most common type of case in which courts apply double jeopardy.

    • @chauffeurmarco
      @chauffeurmarco 8 місяців тому

      Wrong. When the judgement fall, it is over. Another new crime, is an other new crime. If you kill an other person, They can't bring anything from the first one which you were aquited

  • @mofosiyt5672
    @mofosiyt5672 3 роки тому +1

    WHATS HER NAME

    • @ucsdjosh1
      @ucsdjosh1 3 роки тому

      I saw her first. What's her insta?

  • @JohnSmith-ox3gy
    @JohnSmith-ox3gy 2 роки тому

    Can you get prosecuted for one crime in all the states?