The first Cloverfield movie did absolutely brilliantly as a found footage production... It combined all the best parts of a terrifying real life handheld experience while still successfully conveying the scale of the creature and destruction... 😎👍🏼
Agreed, the “sequels” sucked worse than a school of hungry lamprey. Not even John Goodman could save that confusing mess that was 10 Cloverfield Lane and the only “paradox” in Cloverfield Paradox is that such a sucky sequel could be born from a pretty great movie!
The "sequels" had nothing to do with the movie. No matter how much people want to believe it, they're just other movies which they tried to shoehorn in. As much as I loved 10 Cloverfield lane, the movies are not connected. (just gave the same name for marketing purposes)
Leave it to J.J to ruin it lol. Ruined the 2008 movie for me by telling me the monster was infact.. just a BABY.. like what.. that thing was already EXTREMELY overpowered.. so an adult would probably be big enough to stand it's head over the clouds... oh wait.. lol it just ruins the monster.
@@captainmac1005 hey, you leave Clover alone! It’s not her fault the people in charge of the movie have no clue what to do with such an awesome monster!
@@experimetalfan8851 if you watch Cloverfield Paradox or have any knowledge about the ARGs, you'd know that although they take place in separate dimensions, the movies are very much connected because of the space station in Cloverfield Paradox ripping a hole in space-time, allowing them and other things to travel between the dimensions (and through time). That's why nobody seemed to remember the monster attack in 10 Cloverfield Lane, because that attack didn't happen in that dimension, instead, they got an alien invasion. If they weren't connected, then why can the monster from the first one be seen in the third one? Or why does a piece of the space station from the third one (or possibly a satellite from the second one) crash into the ocean in the first one? They're separate dimensions, but they all connected because of the accident on the space station
Interesting note: The woman who bangs her head against the glass door in 10 cloverfield lane is also the same woman who is interviewing the man with glasses in the beginning of Cloverfield paradox. Both characters are credited as Leslie as well.
They should have done a (mock) documentary mini series about the event that took place in the first film and the aftermath. I'm curious to see how the rest of the country (and world) reacted to it...Were there any other attacks, multiple creatures etc.
The first two movies are the result of the third, whose project poked open holes from parallel dimensions/realities into ours; the space-project attracted the interest of other beings: interest usually means resources available for the taking, and before sending costly armed forces, they send a big-boi to sponge attacks and provoke defenses to see what we're packing.
Great synopsis! Especially considering those were unrelated movies that got cobbled together only loosely, and a few details like names were added to make it all look more related than it is. The holes actually make it more real-life believable...
You could be right, but I gotta say that Earth's resources are not really a valid target for any alien species. Everything that's here on Earth can be harvested in great abundance in the rest of the universe, on empty planets and asteroids, without having to kill a local population first.
There was always the idea of making a "sidequel" to Cloverfield. The reasoning being that obviously HUD wasn't the only one filming this night and they(Abrams, if I'm not mistaken) pointed towards Hud and another guy filming each other when the bridge was attacked. So we were supposed to get the story from another POV, which could have been amazing, imo. But I would rather have the Direct sequel we're now supposedly getting.
I remember a rumor at the time that they were going to make a sequel which would have been the same attack but from the perspective of the military and in a more traditional movie style. I think that would have been cool.
The scene where the girl explodes has always bothered me. The fact that she was just a normal person living her life and then dies so horribly just makes it too real. No one deserves that.
As someone who lives in nyc movies like this can really make you feel....uneasy, though likely not to happen all the damage to the city that you see on a regular basis and live in destroyed in such a devestating way really makes you feel the movie much more
This movie was my childhood bomb! I was already a Godzilla and King Kong fanboy so I was gonna enjoy it anyway, but since it was my introduction to the found footage genre, it blew my mind! I have heard of The Blair Witch Project's name before in passing as a kid, but I didn't hear any indication that it was in the style of a real video tape rather than a normal movie. Oddly enough, it was also my introduction to the concept of an ARG even though I only found out about it a couple years later, it made me love the movie even more by adding lore, worldbuilding and just overall made the movie feel even more like it was real rather than just a movie.
Stephen King's The Mist (1980) & the subsequent adaptation, The Mist (2007) by Frank Darabont are jewels in storytelling. Jar Jar Abrams flicks are disgusting jokes. So, I disagree with such idea. 🤬👎🏼
King isn’t interested in linking anything he does with JJA. Even his wife and son have published on their own so they’d all rather keep it in the family IMO.
10 Cloverfield Lane was really good. I actually enjoyed it even more on the second viewing. All the performances in the film are fantastic, and it's paced really well. Loved it.
A few of my theories: [for abbreviation purposes I'll refer to each movie as CF1, CF2, and CF3] 1. Baby Clover's nap was disturbed due to the drilling and is cranky, but also looking for its Mama in CF1 2. The colossal Clover in CF3 is the mama and was transported there due to the Shepard particle accelerator 3. The aliens in CF2 are either the creators of the Seabed Nectar or are trying to harvest it -3a. The aliens in CF2 created the Seabed Nectar and by extension created Mama Clover -3b. The aliens in CF2 are enemies of the Clover creatures and are trying to eradicate them along with human life in fear of humans being 'infected' by the Seabed Nectar -3c. The aliens and the clovers are at war with each other with humans being caught in the middle of it 4. Howard Stambler [John Goodman] or an alternate version of him, worked on the 'satellite' that falls into the ocean in CF1 -4a. T.I.D.O. enlists Stambler to bring down the Satellite -4b. *or* the Satellite falling is a consequential effect of the Paradox[Shepard particle accelerator] 5. Seabed Nectar makes people immune to the green alien gas -5a. Tagruato knows about the aliens, and are trying to get people to consume Seabed Nectar, thus making them the good guys -5b. T.I.D.O. legitimately believes Tagruato to be *just* an oil mining company that's 'bleeding Mother Earth' This is what I'm thinking about when I'm supposed to be asleep.
Good theory, but ime thinking both baby clover and mama clover came from the same universe but ended up getting seperated in cloverfield 1 & 3 baby clover ended up in the sea and came out of it a bit craky looking for mama clover and mama clover ime guessing would be angry that she seperated from baby clover.
Either that or there was a father In CL2. We all saw how massive the mother was in the final film. So it’s possible that the one we saw in CL2 was actually the father.
I was hoping for more of an Eldritch Horror theme. I guess I had the wrong idea. It would have been nice to see Eldritch Horrors up close and done right like the monsters Cloverfield portrays.
Cloverfield paradox seemed like a toned down version of Event Horizon. Still, I liked it. I also think that the particle experiment of this movie created a multidimensional rift. All of it is reminiscent of the horrific dimension that she can be stuck in Warhammer 40K.
I hate to burst your bubble here but the 'third' movie wasn't even filmed as a cloverfield movie, they just tacked on the ending after filming to tie it into the series. I can't believe anyone would watch this movie as a Cloverfield movie and go, "Yup, this is legit!". Then we're supposed to take that fake cloverfield movie that was never meant to be a cloverfield movie and seriously try to weave it into the narrative of other 2 which were made previously? No. That's stupid. Not doing it. It and the people that decided to tie it into cloverfield don't remotely deserve that respect.
Paradox was good bro. It was scary thinking monsters from another dimension came here, thanks to people fucking around in space. Don't you get it? Just get it. 🤣
You'll note that the monster was specifically chasing Hud. It didn't appear until Hud was looking in directions, and when it finally ate Hud, it left the couple alone.
Everyone seems to forget that Abrams wanted to make a movie monster that could (possibly) be America's version of Godzilla. Having the Cloverfield creature grow beyond the heights of clouds was fing laughable to see it happen in what seemed an extremely short time. Cool beast though.
I really like how they've connected these movies together. More than likely these movies wouldn't have done as well without the Cloverfield connection. Adding that in makes them bigger than they were without it. I like the idea that potentially these three movies actually take place in different parallel worlds and times, but all connected to the Particle experiment. Note the monster in the third movie is way bigger than the smaller creature in the first. In the third movie it towers above the clouds whereas in the first it was only a few storey's high. If a fourth movie is done I hope it pulls all these threads together or at least gives us glimpses of what happened in those alternate universes. Either way I'm up for a forth installment especially if it a proper bespoke story for the Cloverfield franchise.
@@xXSPADEGG several movies were supposed to be apart of the cloverfield verse such as a quiet place and overlord. It would’ve been awesome but eh whatever.
@@lukepittman4297 it would have been awesome if done correctly but this is what happens when you try to build a universe out of movies rather than make movies in a universe
I completely disagree. Adding the cloverfield connection only HURT them. The 2nd one in particular. The 3rd was forgettable shlock until it tries to connect all the movies.. but it just hurts them aswell.
The reason why you feel like anything can take place in the Cloverfield series is because only the first movie started out as a Cloverfield film period all the others were stand-alone projects adapted to the Cloverfield universe...
The monster mythos of Cloverfield had so much potential in my mind. It intrigues and fascinates me, but knowing J, the truth is probably just that they're monsters and there isn't anything with depth inside that mystery box. Especially when you take into account that the only way they've prolonged the mystery is by stapling together unrelated projects and just inserting monsters and taking out anything that could look like an 'answer'.
There is a scene at the end of the first movie, the last one you showed, of a satellite like object falling into the ocean off the coast. Could that be the survivors at the of Paradox? And the government done what they could to keep under wraps for so long until Clovie was awakened. Maybe it'll be explained in the 4th movie since it will be directly correlated to the first?
But.. what about the scene from cloverfield where they are at coney island and see something fall from sky in the back ground? I think they are on a ferris wheel.
Originally it was a satellite of some kind, and the creature was supposed to have been already present underwater and it was being investigated by some corporation. They seem to have memory-holed that storyline.
A satellite property of a Japanese corporation-the one that was making the slusho drink and investigating the creature-, but that apparently was reckoned.
Tagruato or something similar I think it was called, pretty sure the crazy guy from the second was meant to be an ex-employee of one of their subsidiary companies too.
So Cloverfield is where movies that can’t get made go to find new life. You figure out a way to include an alien spacecraft or a gigantic monster, and we’ll give your basic plot line a chance to be seen by millions.
I've yet to see anyone mention that the large monster has a neural connection with Hud. It can probably sense other beings too, but for some reason it's sensitive to Hud. When Hud is onboard the helicopter laughing about seeing the monster being being attacked, the monster jumps through smoke to attack Hud's chopper. When Hud is on the ground beneath the creature in central park, the creature senses Hud and actively looks for him, finally finding him and killing him. I'd probably have to watch the movie again to find additional instances.
Why didn't Hud get attacked while they were on the roof then ? They were right by Cloverfield the and on the bridge Hud wasn't targeted. I think you're just reaching bud
@@theterminaldave What roof? When they rescue his girlfriend and they have to go on the roof to go from one building to the next. They had to cross over because Beth's building was leaning on the other.
It was hard to keep up with this longwinded explanation of things, although I appreciate the dedication. It seems like Clover grew. If the first movie happened in 2008 and it was an infant, and the 3rd movie happened in 2028. That's 20 years of feeding and growth, so it might be the same monster. I hope the 4th movie just simplifies the whole story and wraps them all up properly because I still dont understand all this. But it's such good story material.
Nice summaries, saves me the time of binge-watching all three. Also good job tying the films together, I do hope to see a 4th installment now that Mr. Abrams is not working on a Star Wars or Trek project.
Cloverfield (1st film) shows something dropping into the ocean in the Coney Island lost footage which was suspected to have awoken the sea monster. The final film features the escape pod falling into the ocean to meet a monster similar to the one in the first film.
The original plot before the Paradox film was that Bold Futura lost a satellite to ‘unknown malfunctions’ and it fell deep into ocean, near the creature. During recovery, the company that owns both corporations (Bold Futura and Slusho), Tagruato, discovered the animal and began messing with it via their drilling group. The subs they use and the drilling were to dig up seabed nectar, something used in their drinks for Slusho. Somehow, this nectar had to do with the animal’s panicked state. The ingredient is highly psychotropic and actually causes Slusho consumers to experience all sorts of addictive traits and maladaptive psychological response. Somehow, their attempts at both doing their jobs and studying the monster got too much to handle and a mistake was made. It’s likely the parasites were responsible for the disaster as they can be seen in the film with the yellow nectar on their mouths; and being parasites to the giant animal, they likely infected it with whatever psychological distress the ocean nectar causes. Moreover, the satellite was thrown out of space by an alien ship seen in the second film (the viral marketing confirms this via an actual photo). It’s possible the parasites are one of the biological weapons the aliens dispatch on the ground. This would explain why they irritated the giant animal so much and how they were able to get there (via the satellite). How they survived the fall into atmosphere riding a satellite is a mystery to me, since a simple Fireaxe was able to kill one. But that’s like just movie writing at its core. The parasites were likely what causes the satellite to crash as well. This may make you wonder “so is Cloverfield an alien weapon too?” Well no, it would appear in an attempt to make an American Godzilla movie, JJ burrowed not only the idea of a mutant creature getting into infected by man’s greed and attacking back, but the alien-like arch enemies that Godzilla often faces were also at play, making the aliens from the first film the natural nemesis of the cloverfield monster. I was hoping they would fight each other in the final film, but it seems JJ has lost his original desire to do an American style Godzilla.
Yeah, but is it transitioning between realities during that time? One thing the 3rd film actually gets right is that, even if you successfully time traveled, the Earth itself would still be somewhere else along its orbit.
The first two movies were good enough standalones and they didn't need that third pointless clusterfuk of badly written ideas to make a cinematic universe.
The original plot before the Paradox film was that Bold Futura lost a satellite to ‘unknown malfunctions’ and it fell deep into ocean, near the creature. During recovery, the company that owns both corporations (Bold Futura and Slusho), Tagruato, discovered the animal and began messing with it via their drilling group. The subs they use and the drilling were to dig up seabed nectar, something used in their drinks for Slusho. Somehow, this nectar had to do with the animal’s panicked state. The ingredient is highly psychotropic and actually causes Slusho consumers to experience all sorts of addictive traits and maladaptive psychological response. Somehow, their attempts at both doing their jobs and studying the monster got too much to handle and a mistake was made. It’s likely the parasites were responsible for the disaster as they can be seen in the film with the yellow nectar on their mouths; and being parasites to the giant animal, they likely infected it with whatever psychological distress the ocean nectar causes. Moreover, the satellite was thrown out of space by an alien ship seen in the second film (the viral marketing confirms this via an actual photo). It’s possible the parasites are one of the biological weapons the aliens dispatch on the ground. This would explain why they irritated the giant animal so much and how they were able to get there (via the satellite). How they survived the fall into atmosphere riding a satellite is a mystery to me, since a simple Fireaxe was able to kill one. But that’s likely just movie writing at its core. The parasites were likely what causes the satellite to crash as well. I thought taking the Valencia script to show this side of the story was great. However, I think it should have been in 2007, not modern times. It would avert the need for crazy dimensional plotlines. This may make you wonder “so is Cloverfield an alien weapon too?” Well no, it would appear in an attempt to make an American Godzilla movie, JJ burrowed not only the idea of a mutant creature getting infected by man’s greed and attacking back, but the alien-like arch enemies that Godzilla often faces were also at play, making the aliens from the second film the natural nemesis of the cloverfield monster. I was hoping they would fight each other in the final film, but it seems JJ has lost his original desire to do an American style Godzilla.
Am I the only one seeing the massive similarities between Cthulhu and clovey other that basic appearance, they're both Giant lovecraftian monsters, laid dormant in the sea before being awoken and going on a rampage, or in Cthulhu's case making the world destroy itself, the spawn of Cthulhu etc. It's almost like he just made surface level changes
Found footage movies are always scarier to me. Makes it feel more real like it actually happened. When I first saw this as a kid it scared the shit out of me cause I thought it actually happened.
That wasn’t the same monster that attacked the guy at the end, that was another, MUUUUUUUCH smaller one. I always assumed the parasites eventually grow into that “adult” form, and that was a new adult, that was still only like 20ft tall, or something. Whatever the situation though, that was not the same multi-thousand foot tall monster we had been seeing throughout the entire movie before that. Also, did that smaller one actually cut the guy in half? I thought he just killed him, and he fell, I never noticed anything about him having been cut in half.
If we remember the first portion of the movie when it appeared, Marlena’s character explained that it was “eating everyone” when they found her in a state of shock and covered in blood/dust. I believe that Hud’s character was bitten in half, his lower half being essentially consumed and his upper half falling to the ground. The sound of that entire exchange/experience was nauseatingly intense, you can tell they really did do their research on the sounds of creatures eating in that scene - not to mention made the nightmare of being eaten alive and screaming a real visceral thing that you see in this movie. It was incredibly well done.
I think A Quiet Place 1 and 2 may kinda be related to the Cloverfield universe with the whole alien invasion scenario along with humanity trying to survive the extra terrestrial inhabitants.
Thanks for the breakdown. It's way too long between movies. Makes me appreciate how the original Star Wars movies didn't take long to all come out rather quickly by comparison.
i have never seen the other two cloverfield films, i only saw the first cloverfield film that literally had the cloverfield monster attacking new york city. It's crazy how i didn't know that there was 3 films in total
We see a giant monster, on a vicious rampage to destroy humanity out of senseless hatred. Whats actually happening, is that an ant bit a napping child, so the child kicked the mound and it escalated predictably from there.
So, you mean i would have to go watch all three Cloverfield movies to make sense of the upcoming 4th one? OK. Already watched the the 1st and 2nd ones. May have to watch them again & then, watch the 3rd one. BTW, great review of all three movies. However, one thing remains unanswered: WHERE DID THAT SPACESHIP AT THE END OF THE 2ND MOVIE, COME FROM?
I've been looking for 10 Cloverfield Lane for a while now but I just wanted to remark how funny I think the makeshift gasmask is! I really got into the hobby of making gasmasks lately and my latest one looks just like that! I just think that's funny.
I love this video ,FINALLY! SOMEONE MAKES A VIDEO ON THIS .FINALLY!!!! and Thank You. 2021 finally there's a video on Clover( I call the monster Clover).
The second movie was good, but the ending with the cocktail killed it for me. A type 2 civilization space ships not going down with a cocktail. Otherwise the movie was great
re 00:27:35 where the monster notices the injured guy on the ground. my only complaint is that for a monster that big and high, the humans should only appear as ant or dots and specially when laying prone. but the monster not only manages to focus on it and but comes down several hundred feet and devours the guy.
The reason the 2 sequels didn't have a direct sequel feel to them was because neither sequel was originally a sequel to Cloverfield. 10 CLOVERFIELD LANE. Was originally a film called VALENCIA that JJ Abrams had produced for a low budget arm of Paramount films. When Paramount shut down the section they had 4 unreleased films from that section. Valencia was one of them. JJ Abrams decided with some extra shots it could be turned into a Cloverfield sequel, So they did. CLOVERFIELD PARADOX. Was originally a film called GOD PARTICLE. They even advertised it. Fans thought before the producers had even thought about it that it might be a Cloverfield film. It was only when they were in post production JJ Abrams decided they could turn it into a Cloverfield film. Sadly the extra bits cost Paramount and extra $40 million. Paramount knew the film would never make the money back at the cinema, so they did a deal with Netflix.
The monster at the end of 3 is a different one from the original. It's much bigger I believe. It's well above the clouds where the original one was only small skyscraper size. I believe there is meant to be 3 or 4 different universes affected by the Paradox. But I don't really count it as canon. Like you said, it wasnt even written to be a Cloverfield movie. And Cloverfield Lane, even JJ says it's more of a cousin project rather than a sister project since they are that far removed. They are each good movies on their own, but not together. I also wish I could see what Paradox was meant to be. It is an interesting idea for a movie. You can also see a satellite fall into the ocean during the "flashback scenes" at the pier. And the backwards "it's still alive" message at the end of the movie. I wonder what they actually originally were thinking of for sequels.
@@LandynWilkins no matter how you put it the one from the first one was not getting it's head above the clouds. I forget who made it, maybe CZ, about all the dimensions and stuff from that series and how the paradox affected them all. I believe there's 3 or 4 dimensions affected. But the original Clover monster and the one from the third one are absolutely two different monsters. Guaranteed
I always thought the giant Monster at the end of the third movie was one of the parents of Clover, that would have come to search for him. I would really love if the fourth movie focused some more on the origins of Clover and his parasites. It's great tht they don't do find footage anymore for the fourth one as the first one sucked. It was too much movement. I was it at the theatre and I came out with a huge headache, hating on the movie because I had to close my eyes mid movie to avoid hurting more. That movie was a nightmare to watch on the big screen. One of the very rare movie I regretted paying big bucks to see it.
My theory is that the monster from the 3rd one is the mother of the one from the original. After the machine in Cloverfield paradox goes off it separates the mother and child. But i don't know why they both went to Manhattan. Maybe because its one of the closest places. Tell me what you think of my theory.
the creature falls from the sky in the background while the two people are on the ferris wheel at the end of the first movie. There was debates about that for years, a few months ago the director or writer confirmed that was the creature falling from the sky.
They really blew it with clover field sequels the first one was so cool I was so hyped for new movies like it would be like aliens or predator but no they completely changed everything we knew about it and did a terrible job at telling the lore the 2nd movie was good but paradox geez man they rlly were just throwing it together it’s funny bc the 2nd one wasn’t even meant to be connected but it was a good movie without being clover field paradox would’ve been bad either way imo
the problem with the explanation of where the monster came from is that; if it came from the bottom of the ocean, with al the pressure of all that water pressing down on it, if it came to the surface, it would expand, to the point that it would explode, that is why they can't bring living fish up from those depths, the pressure change causes the body to expand, the body expands causing the blood to essentially boil and the gills and brain to become so damaged that it kills the fish or what ever it it is .
Hard to believe Cloverfield is almost 14 years old. Love the franchise. Super 88 used the monster from #1, and in my mind ads it the the series, in that unrelated/related way like the others, almost like a prequel, yet not...unless u want it to be. Lol.
In the Coney Island footage from the first movie, there is a “thing” either crashing into the ocean or it is an “activation beam” (ala the alien pods from War of the Worlds).
I never understood all the hate toward the Cloverfield Paradox, i thought it was a good movie and i really liked the way they chose to build the Cloverfield Saga, using these different stories and working them into eachother into one big narrative.
@@Mxyz no i was being a troll i know what happened they got alot of bad comments towards there video which is there fault because they titled the video wrong and made the video about reviewing and trashing there own list of monsters .. the video was titled bone chilling monsters in movies that need to be watched of 2021 or something like that ..but they make so many mistakes in there videos and when people trash it they get upset and take down there own video or turn it to private so noone can see it but thats all there fault ,if there actually cared about the work they wouldn't be making so many mistakes which leads to people trashing there comment section.. there voice actors dont care about what the script says because they just mispronounce words so easily ...or they dont tell the actors to watch the video on what the topic is for better understanding .. i get they bring 20 minutes of content but the information is some how still wrong for what they say is proper research
@@Mxyziv watched alot of there videos i love them as a channel but they dont show proper care ..they just do production send out all the videos we can and say f it to anything we get wrong .. like i can name a few videos and the mistakes they made in ,,,one of the thundercat videos they said the sword of omen is rapier ..not like a broadsword or long sword...they called egon from ghostbusters egan... when everyone knows its egon ..because all you got to do is which any of the movies to know that ...stuff like that which is easy to fix or say right the first time ...and when any calls them out on it.. they ether block them in the comments or delete or private the video's if it gets to much hate ...instead of fixing the issues or preventing them .. which there not doing because they dont say anything to the actors or editors or the script writers
I don't particularly like most of JJ Abrams works, because most of the connections are half-assed after the fact plot points that never existed before the production was actually started. There's too many continuity issues where the audience knows there's something wrong about the story because of previous scenes and missing background story points that were never addressed in a production in the first place. Abrams develops story boards where the climax or major plot points are left out and are added in later, which means it is pointless for a viewer to guess what a mystery is, because the question hasn't been answered by the director, screenwriter, or developer of a film or series ahead of time. That in summary is exactly why you cannot guess the ultimate answer to Abrams works, because he hasn't thought about the answer himself, which is indicated by the lack of story plot scenes that even hint of the resultant outcomes. Now, you realize why the Star Wars trilogy assigned to JJ Abrams to work on was so haphazardly fragmented in plot and continuity problems. That's how JJ Abrams works.
The first Cloverfield movie did absolutely brilliantly as a found footage production...
It combined all the best parts of a terrifying real life handheld experience while still successfully conveying the scale of the creature and destruction...
😎👍🏼
Agreed, the “sequels” sucked worse than a school of hungry lamprey. Not even John Goodman could save that confusing mess that was 10 Cloverfield Lane and the only “paradox” in Cloverfield Paradox is that such a sucky sequel could be born from a pretty great movie!
The "sequels" had nothing to do with the movie.
No matter how much people want to believe it, they're just other movies which they tried to shoehorn in.
As much as I loved 10 Cloverfield lane, the movies are not connected.
(just gave the same name for marketing purposes)
Leave it to J.J to ruin it lol. Ruined the 2008 movie for me by telling me the monster was infact.. just a BABY.. like what.. that thing was already EXTREMELY overpowered.. so an adult would probably be big enough to stand it's head over the clouds... oh wait.. lol it just ruins the monster.
@@captainmac1005 hey, you leave Clover alone! It’s not her fault the people in charge of the movie have no clue what to do with such an awesome monster!
@@experimetalfan8851 if you watch Cloverfield Paradox or have any knowledge about the ARGs, you'd know that although they take place in separate dimensions, the movies are very much connected because of the space station in Cloverfield Paradox ripping a hole in space-time, allowing them and other things to travel between the dimensions (and through time). That's why nobody seemed to remember the monster attack in 10 Cloverfield Lane, because that attack didn't happen in that dimension, instead, they got an alien invasion. If they weren't connected, then why can the monster from the first one be seen in the third one? Or why does a piece of the space station from the third one (or possibly a satellite from the second one) crash into the ocean in the first one? They're separate dimensions, but they all connected because of the accident on the space station
Interesting note: The woman who bangs her head against the glass door in 10 cloverfield lane is also the same woman who is interviewing the man with glasses in the beginning of Cloverfield paradox. Both characters are credited as Leslie as well.
Could be alternate versions of each other. Just a head canon.
@@mayowaakinola5140 more likey the actress was humping JJ and wanted more roles, she cant have been that good to only get 2 minor cameos.
@@mayowaakinola5140 There's is nothing wrong with head canon if it can't be disproved. 👌 I'm with you on that one.
Seeing as they are set in different universes she is probably the same character
They should have done a (mock) documentary mini series about the event that took place in the first film and the aftermath. I'm curious to see how the rest of the country (and world) reacted to it...Were there any other attacks, multiple creatures etc.
Oh yeah a mockumentary would be a good idea.
The first two movies are the result of the third, whose project poked open holes from parallel dimensions/realities into ours; the space-project attracted the interest of other beings: interest usually means resources available for the taking, and before sending costly armed forces, they send a big-boi to sponge attacks and provoke defenses to see what we're packing.
MAKES GREAT SENSE!
BEST REGARDS!
Great synopsis!
Especially considering those were unrelated movies that got cobbled together only loosely, and a few details like names were added to make it all look more related than it is. The holes actually make it more real-life believable...
Kinda. That big monster was sleeping for a couple of years before he woke up
You could be right, but I gotta say that Earth's resources are not really a valid target for any alien species. Everything that's here on Earth can be harvested in great abundance in the rest of the universe, on empty planets and asteroids, without having to kill a local population first.
I really hope they don't jack it up by making it unrelated to it all
Honestly I just wish there was an actual sequel to the first Cloverfield movie. A direct continuation of that story
It's in the works at the moment.
There was always the idea of making a "sidequel" to Cloverfield.
The reasoning being that obviously HUD wasn't the only one filming this night and they(Abrams, if I'm not mistaken) pointed towards Hud and another guy filming each other when the bridge was attacked.
So we were supposed to get the story from another POV, which could have been amazing, imo.
But I would rather have the Direct sequel we're now supposedly getting.
I remember a rumor at the time that they were going to make a sequel which would have been the same attack but from the perspective of the military and in a more traditional movie style. I think that would have been cool.
@@maxpiemuse9584 from a soldiers gopro, that would be awesome.
Same
The first Cloverfield was legendary, the camera angle they used was back then was really immersive.
The scene where the girl explodes has always bothered me. The fact that she was just a normal person living her life and then dies so horribly just makes it too real. No one deserves that.
Yeah she was so beautiful
Few People deserves that but thing like that happen in conflict
Sounds a lot like what's happening to folks today...
Yea, and there is a very real chance you die a horrible, gruesome death. Just happens to some us.
You don’t even know tho
Man, I remember when the first one came out with it's ARG, I was so damn invested in it. I'm sad nothing really came from it.
J.J.'s projects are pretty insane with their ARGs. LOST had a mind-bending one as well!
@@SalviAlmighty exactly, J.J. projects are so exciting at the beginning and all always end up really ugly
ARG?
@@NakedSnake85 augmented reality games (basically a digital scavenger hunt where you search for very well hidden clues along different mediums)
@@WestonEvans *Alternate Reality Game
As someone who lives in nyc movies like this can really make you feel....uneasy, though likely not to happen all the damage to the city that you see on a regular basis and live in destroyed in such a devestating way really makes you feel the movie much more
Yo i live in NYC and no lie i be thinking about this movie and i wonder what if this actually happened ? 😂
I wouldn’t mind if a kaiju stomped through NYC, I’d drink beer and laugh on my couch
@@jakemocci3953 maybe we could smoke a joint too
I want this to happen...
@@n.b.l.5709 Godzilla and Kong would be proud.
To be honest as far as found footage movies go, cloverfield is probably the best you gonna get. It was actually entertaining lol
Chronicle is also a good movie
As Above, So Blow is excellent!
meh, you forget a lot of gems, poughkeepsie tapes, lake mungo, rec 1 and 2 (spanish original version) and a lot more
This movie was my childhood bomb! I was already a Godzilla and King Kong fanboy so I was gonna enjoy it anyway, but since it was my introduction to the found footage genre, it blew my mind! I have heard of The Blair Witch Project's name before in passing as a kid, but I didn't hear any indication that it was in the style of a real video tape rather than a normal movie. Oddly enough, it was also my introduction to the concept of an ARG even though I only found out about it a couple years later, it made me love the movie even more by adding lore, worldbuilding and just overall made the movie feel even more like it was real rather than just a movie.
Bigfoot: the lost coast tapes is an underrated film.
Anybody else feel like The Mist should be apart of this universe too? I always felt like they take place in the same world...
Stephen King's The Mist (1980) & the subsequent adaptation, The Mist (2007) by Frank Darabont are jewels in storytelling. Jar Jar Abrams flicks are disgusting jokes. So, I disagree with such idea. 🤬👎🏼
@@GioAtero strong opinion you gave
King isn’t interested in linking anything he does with JJA. Even his wife and son have published on their own so they’d all rather keep it in the family IMO.
You should read Kings books like IT, the Dark Tower series and Tales from a Buick 8. Then you will understand the universe / macroverse encompassed
Yesss!!!
10 Cloverfield Lane was really good. I actually enjoyed it even more on the second viewing. All the performances in the film are fantastic, and it's paced really well. Loved it.
A few of my theories:
[for abbreviation purposes I'll refer to each movie as CF1, CF2, and CF3]
1. Baby Clover's nap was disturbed due to the drilling and is cranky, but also looking for its Mama in CF1
2. The colossal Clover in CF3 is the mama and was transported there due to the Shepard particle accelerator
3. The aliens in CF2 are either the creators of the Seabed Nectar or are trying to harvest it
-3a. The aliens in CF2 created the Seabed Nectar and by extension created Mama Clover
-3b. The aliens in CF2 are enemies of the Clover creatures and are trying to eradicate them along with human life in fear of humans being 'infected' by the Seabed Nectar
-3c. The aliens and the clovers are at war with each other with humans being caught in the middle of it
4. Howard Stambler [John Goodman] or an alternate version of him, worked on the 'satellite' that falls into the ocean in CF1
-4a. T.I.D.O. enlists Stambler to bring down the Satellite
-4b. *or* the Satellite falling is a consequential effect of the Paradox[Shepard particle accelerator]
5. Seabed Nectar makes people immune to the green alien gas
-5a. Tagruato knows about the aliens, and are trying to get people to consume Seabed Nectar, thus making them the good guys
-5b. T.I.D.O. legitimately believes Tagruato to be *just* an oil mining company that's 'bleeding Mother Earth'
This is what I'm thinking about when I'm supposed to be asleep.
Good theory, but ime thinking both baby clover and mama clover came from the same universe but ended up getting seperated in cloverfield 1 & 3 baby clover ended up in the sea and came out of it a bit craky looking for mama clover and mama clover ime guessing would be angry that she seperated from baby clover.
assumed the aliens and the clover mosters where the same
You’re going places kid
@@razorbackroar Interconnected theories
Either that or there was a father In CL2. We all saw how massive the mother was in the final film. So it’s possible that the one we saw in CL2 was actually the father.
I sincerely appreciate cloverfield videos especially deep dives. The ARG is unbelievable that adds so many new layers to Cloverfield Story
I was hoping for more of an Eldritch Horror theme. I guess I had the wrong idea. It would have been nice to see Eldritch Horrors up close and done right like the monsters Cloverfield portrays.
Cloverfield paradox seemed like a toned down version of Event Horizon. Still, I liked it. I also think that the particle experiment of this movie created a multidimensional rift. All of it is reminiscent of the horrific dimension that she can be stuck in Warhammer 40K.
Event Horizon needs a sequel.
Event horizon was so much better though
I hate to burst your bubble here but the 'third' movie wasn't even filmed as a cloverfield movie, they just tacked on the ending after filming to tie it into the series. I can't believe anyone would watch this movie as a Cloverfield movie and go, "Yup, this is legit!". Then we're supposed to take that fake cloverfield movie that was never meant to be a cloverfield movie and seriously try to weave it into the narrative of other 2 which were made previously? No. That's stupid. Not doing it. It and the people that decided to tie it into cloverfield don't remotely deserve that respect.
Paradox was good bro. It was scary thinking monsters from another dimension came here, thanks to people fucking around in space. Don't you get it? Just get it. 🤣
i love that at least Lilly survived in the first movie.
You'll note that the monster was specifically chasing Hud. It didn't appear until Hud was looking in directions, and when it finally ate Hud, it left the couple alone.
ya i wondered about that. perhaps it hated hud's crappy dialogue also. :P
Everyone seems to forget that Abrams wanted to make a movie monster that could (possibly) be America's version of Godzilla. Having the Cloverfield creature grow beyond the heights of clouds was fing laughable to see it happen in what seemed an extremely short time. Cool beast though.
Same species different individuals, monster from the first one is an adolescent so the one from paradox is probably an adult.
Nvm apparently JJ himself said they’re the same but the in-universe time gap is 20 years 2008-2028 so that’s 20 years of growth
Having them be that big is WHY they suck lol. Just not entertaining when the monster is just that big. Seems too overpowered, thus kinda boring.
The lack of backing soundtrack really added to the film and made it more realistic.
I really like how they've connected these movies together. More than likely these movies wouldn't have done as well without the Cloverfield connection. Adding that in makes them bigger than they were without it. I like the idea that potentially these three movies actually take place in different parallel worlds and times, but all connected to the Particle experiment. Note the monster in the third movie is way bigger than the smaller creature in the first. In the third movie it towers above the clouds whereas in the first it was only a few storey's high. If a fourth movie is done I hope it pulls all these threads together or at least gives us glimpses of what happened in those alternate universes. Either way I'm up for a forth installment especially if it a proper bespoke story for the Cloverfield franchise.
Wasn’t the fourth movie announced a while ago, it was apparently going to be set during a world war
That was “Overlord” it was a rumoured 4th cloverfield movie but ended up not being
@@xXSPADEGG several movies were supposed to be apart of the cloverfield verse such as a quiet place and overlord. It would’ve been awesome but eh whatever.
@@lukepittman4297 it would have been awesome if done correctly but this is what happens when you try to build a universe out of movies rather than make movies in a universe
I completely disagree. Adding the cloverfield connection only HURT them. The 2nd one in particular. The 3rd was forgettable shlock until it tries to connect all the movies.. but it just hurts them aswell.
The reason why you feel like anything can take place in the Cloverfield series is because only the first movie started out as a Cloverfield film period all the others were stand-alone projects adapted to the Cloverfield universe...
isn't that how it always works?
thats kinda how spin offs works
Eh you're forgetting the fact in the first one you see something crashing down into the ocean EG. The guys from space came back
The monster mythos of Cloverfield had so much potential in my mind. It intrigues and fascinates me, but knowing J, the truth is probably just that they're monsters and there isn't anything with depth inside that mystery box.
Especially when you take into account that the only way they've prolonged the mystery is by stapling together unrelated projects and just inserting monsters and taking out anything that could look like an 'answer'.
They have a new one coming out bud chill
@@AgentSquiddy 4 movies?...
@@SStupendous yup a direct sequel to the first Cloverfield movie. Set to release in 2022 but I bet it'll be pushed to 2023
There is a scene at the end of the first movie, the last one you showed, of a satellite like object falling into the ocean off the coast. Could that be the survivors at the of Paradox? And the government done what they could to keep under wraps for so long until Clovie was awakened. Maybe it'll be explained in the 4th movie since it will be directly correlated to the first?
Well done dude! I swear nobody else noticed. Its from space, not the ocean. 👍
Absolutely loved the viral marketing campaign for the first one! First one I've ever participated in! ❤️
But.. what about the scene from cloverfield where they are at coney island and see something fall from sky in the back ground? I think they are on a ferris wheel.
Originally it was a satellite of some kind, and the creature was supposed to have been already present underwater and it was being investigated by some corporation. They seem to have memory-holed that storyline.
Maybe it was the escape capsule from 3?
Its the escape pod from 3
A satellite property of a Japanese corporation-the one that was making the slusho drink and investigating the creature-, but that apparently was reckoned.
Tagruato or something similar I think it was called, pretty sure the crazy guy from the second was meant to be an ex-employee of one of their subsidiary companies too.
So Cloverfield is where movies that can’t get made go to find new life. You figure out a way to include an alien spacecraft or a gigantic monster, and we’ll give your basic plot line a chance to be seen by millions.
I've yet to see anyone mention that the large monster has a neural connection with Hud. It can probably sense other beings too, but for some reason it's sensitive to Hud.
When Hud is onboard the helicopter laughing about seeing the monster being being attacked, the monster jumps through smoke to attack Hud's chopper. When Hud is on the ground beneath the creature in central park, the creature senses Hud and actively looks for him, finally finding him and killing him. I'd probably have to watch the movie again to find additional instances.
Don't you think that is just for plot reasons? Like a reverse plot armour? Plot magnet if you will.
@@MrTuubster I like that, plot magnet.
Excuse me while I coin that term 😅
Why didn't Hud get attacked while they were on the roof then ? They were right by Cloverfield the and on the bridge Hud wasn't targeted. I think you're just reaching bud
@@AgentSquiddy which roof?
@@theterminaldave What roof? When they rescue his girlfriend and they have to go on the roof to go from one building to the next. They had to cross over because Beth's building was leaning on the other.
I don't think the monster in the third and first movie are the same. The one in the first movie was not big enough to be seen over clouds
The first movie creature was only a baby
It was hard to keep up with this longwinded explanation of things, although I appreciate the dedication. It seems like Clover grew. If the first movie happened in 2008 and it was an infant, and the 3rd movie happened in 2028. That's 20 years of feeding and growth, so it might be the same monster. I hope the 4th movie just simplifies the whole story and wraps them all up properly because I still dont understand all this. But it's such good story material.
name exactly
@@tolazytoname3342 there was 2 of em a baby and a grown version
I’m pretty sure there are two monsters in the first. One we see and one we don’t
The good: A new IP, an different monster
The bad: bringing Shaky cam into the Mainstream
Saving Private Ryan laughs shaky
Blair Witch Project has entered the shaky chat
The Bourne Saga would like a shaky word with you.
Love love love your ambiguity!!! …’about precisely’!!!!!!!😂😂🎉is that, “around approximately”?
Or 3 unrelated films stapled together with references
Or as JJ likes to put it "mystery box"
Simply OUTSTANDING breakdown!👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Nice summaries, saves me the time of binge-watching all three. Also good job tying the films together, I do hope to see a 4th installment now that Mr. Abrams is not working on a Star Wars or Trek project.
Cloverfield (1st film) shows something dropping into the ocean in the Coney Island lost footage which was suspected to have awoken the sea monster. The final film features the escape pod falling into the ocean to meet a monster similar to the one in the first film.
The original plot before the Paradox film was that Bold Futura lost a satellite to ‘unknown malfunctions’ and it fell deep into ocean, near the creature. During recovery, the company that owns both corporations (Bold Futura and Slusho), Tagruato, discovered the animal and began messing with it via their drilling group. The subs they use and the drilling were to dig up seabed nectar, something used in their drinks for Slusho. Somehow, this nectar had to do with the animal’s panicked state. The ingredient is highly psychotropic and actually causes Slusho consumers to experience all sorts of addictive traits and maladaptive psychological response. Somehow, their attempts at both doing their jobs and studying the monster got too much to handle and a mistake was made. It’s likely the parasites were responsible for the disaster as they can be seen in the film with the yellow nectar on their mouths; and being parasites to the giant animal, they likely infected it with whatever psychological distress the ocean nectar causes.
Moreover, the satellite was thrown out of space by an alien ship seen in the second film (the viral marketing confirms this via an actual photo). It’s possible the parasites are one of the biological weapons the aliens dispatch on the ground. This would explain why they irritated the giant animal so much and how they were able to get there (via the satellite). How they survived the fall into atmosphere riding a satellite is a mystery to me, since a simple Fireaxe was able to kill one. But that’s like just movie writing at its core. The parasites were likely what causes the satellite to crash as well.
This may make you wonder “so is Cloverfield an alien weapon too?” Well no, it would appear in an attempt to make an American Godzilla movie, JJ burrowed not only the idea of a mutant creature getting into infected by man’s greed and attacking back, but the alien-like arch enemies that Godzilla often faces were also at play, making the aliens from the first film the natural nemesis of the cloverfield monster. I was hoping they would fight each other in the final film, but it seems JJ has lost his original desire to do an American style Godzilla.
Yeah, but is it transitioning between realities during that time? One thing the 3rd film actually gets right is that, even if you successfully time traveled, the Earth itself would still be somewhere else along its orbit.
@@joeycoe85 Not just Earth but the entire solar system and the universe in general.
Saga is a very generous term, there is barely any connective tissue between these 3 films, if any at all.
"...but deh all gots Clover in deh title?"
- Anyone who thinks there's a connection
Actually that’s not true. They are all connected. As much as Cloverfield Paradox went out like a wet fart haha I’m a massive Cloverfield
@@abductedbyhorror1238 Relying on JJ's "mystery box" excuse is not making things connected...
@@Mate397 not at all. It’s easy to see how they are all connected to each other. It has nothing to do with them all having “Cloverfield” in the title.
@@abductedbyhorror1238 I never said that...do you even know what JJ's mystery box story telling is?
The first two movies were good enough standalones and they didn't need that third pointless clusterfuk of badly written ideas to make a cinematic universe.
@Will R Thomson It's a fake trailer and that scene is from some other movie.
underwater feels like the direct prequel to the first movie after watching this
The original plot before the Paradox film was that Bold Futura lost a satellite to ‘unknown malfunctions’ and it fell deep into ocean, near the creature. During recovery, the company that owns both corporations (Bold Futura and Slusho), Tagruato, discovered the animal and began messing with it via their drilling group. The subs they use and the drilling were to dig up seabed nectar, something used in their drinks for Slusho. Somehow, this nectar had to do with the animal’s panicked state. The ingredient is highly psychotropic and actually causes Slusho consumers to experience all sorts of addictive traits and maladaptive psychological response. Somehow, their attempts at both doing their jobs and studying the monster got too much to handle and a mistake was made. It’s likely the parasites were responsible for the disaster as they can be seen in the film with the yellow nectar on their mouths; and being parasites to the giant animal, they likely infected it with whatever psychological distress the ocean nectar causes.
Moreover, the satellite was thrown out of space by an alien ship seen in the second film (the viral marketing confirms this via an actual photo). It’s possible the parasites are one of the biological weapons the aliens dispatch on the ground. This would explain why they irritated the giant animal so much and how they were able to get there (via the satellite). How they survived the fall into atmosphere riding a satellite is a mystery to me, since a simple Fireaxe was able to kill one. But that’s likely just movie writing at its core. The parasites were likely what causes the satellite to crash as well. I thought taking the Valencia script to show this side of the story was great. However, I think it should have been in 2007, not modern times. It would avert the need for crazy dimensional plotlines.
This may make you wonder “so is Cloverfield an alien weapon too?” Well no, it would appear in an attempt to make an American Godzilla movie, JJ burrowed not only the idea of a mutant creature getting infected by man’s greed and attacking back, but the alien-like arch enemies that Godzilla often faces were also at play, making the aliens from the second film the natural nemesis of the cloverfield monster. I was hoping they would fight each other in the final film, but it seems JJ has lost his original desire to do an American style Godzilla.
What is that!?
Hud: it's a terrible thing
My boy Hud was the unsung hero of this movie.
We need more Cloverfield...
I darn love ALL OF 'EM.
Good explanation and video! Didn't fully understand all the films.
Am I the only one seeing the massive similarities between Cthulhu and clovey other that basic appearance, they're both Giant lovecraftian monsters, laid dormant in the sea before being awoken and going on a rampage, or in Cthulhu's case making the world destroy itself, the spawn of Cthulhu etc. It's almost like he just made surface level changes
Cloverfield was a perfect blend of Show and tell.
Found footage movies are always scarier to me. Makes it feel more real like it actually happened. When I first saw this as a kid it scared the shit out of me cause I thought it actually happened.
Superb overview!!!!! I guess the producers of Cloverfield paradox never heard of zero point energy! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Besides that, they are indeed great movies!
6 adds is so much but good video my dude ^^
The mostly first person view of the film definitely makes it scarier
That wasn’t the same monster that attacked the guy at the end, that was another, MUUUUUUUCH smaller one. I always assumed the parasites eventually grow into that “adult” form, and that was a new adult, that was still only like 20ft tall, or something. Whatever the situation though, that was not the same multi-thousand foot tall monster we had been seeing throughout the entire movie before that.
Also, did that smaller one actually cut the guy in half? I thought he just killed him, and he fell, I never noticed anything about him having been cut in half.
If we remember the first portion of the movie when it appeared, Marlena’s character explained that it was “eating everyone” when they found her in a state of shock and covered in blood/dust. I believe that Hud’s character was bitten in half, his lower half being essentially consumed and his upper half falling to the ground. The sound of that entire exchange/experience was nauseatingly intense, you can tell they really did do their research on the sounds of creatures eating in that scene - not to mention made the nightmare of being eaten alive and screaming a real visceral thing that you see in this movie. It was incredibly well done.
I think A Quiet Place 1 and 2 may kinda be related to the Cloverfield universe with the whole alien invasion scenario along with humanity trying to survive the extra terrestrial inhabitants.
And "Nope," had the same kind of living UFO as 10 Cloverfield lane. Then the 3rd one was like Event Horizon, except not as good.
The first movie needs a sequel.
We need more of these these are my fave especially the first one when she’s stuck in the bunker with the fat guy
Thanks for the breakdown. It's way too long between movies. Makes me appreciate how the original Star Wars movies didn't take long to all come out rather quickly by comparison.
I love these movies the interconnecting stories, parallel universes etc. I hope they make more of these.
Although the theory has been denied, some fans consider JJ Abrams other film Super 8 as a part of the Cloverfield universe as well.
Idk man that was a Hole other alien He Wanted To go Home like ET 😂😂😂🙏no evil just sad trying to come Home with his Cubes
Super 8 was about as soulless as The Cloverfield Paradox so there is that.
@@tunnocks super 8 was great stfu
@@Losabias111 yeah, for fuckwits.
@@tunnocks nah for everyone, now go sleep nigga.
i have never seen the other two cloverfield films, i only saw the first cloverfield film that literally had the cloverfield monster attacking new york city. It's crazy how i didn't know that there was 3 films in total
We see a giant monster, on a vicious rampage to destroy humanity out of senseless hatred. Whats actually happening, is that an ant bit a napping child, so the child kicked the mound and it escalated predictably from there.
So, you mean i would have to go watch all three Cloverfield movies to make sense of the upcoming 4th one? OK. Already watched the the 1st and 2nd ones. May have to watch them again & then, watch the 3rd one.
BTW, great review of all three movies. However, one thing remains unanswered: WHERE DID THAT SPACESHIP AT THE END OF THE 2ND MOVIE, COME FROM?
I've been looking for 10 Cloverfield Lane for a while now but I just wanted to remark how funny I think the makeshift gasmask is! I really got into the hobby of making gasmasks lately and my latest one looks just like that! I just think that's funny.
I love this video ,FINALLY! SOMEONE MAKES A VIDEO ON THIS .FINALLY!!!! and Thank You. 2021 finally there's a video on Clover( I call the monster Clover).
The third one bored the living shit outta me. Go figure.
Great first two flicks! Third was brutal
The second movie was good, but the ending with the cocktail killed it for me. A type 2 civilization space ships not going down with a cocktail. Otherwise the movie was great
The ship looked bio mechanical though, so maybe a cocktail in the throat was enough. The bigger ship at the end is a different story.
re 00:27:35 where the monster notices the injured guy on the ground. my only complaint is that for a monster that big and high, the humans should only appear as ant or dots and specially when laying prone. but the monster not only manages to focus on it and but comes down several hundred feet and devours the guy.
Knowing the way things work with this franchise, We might have seen Cloverfiled 4 already lol
Or 0. Prequel style 🥴
There's one in development
"a quiet place"
The reason the 2 sequels didn't have a direct sequel feel to them was because neither sequel was originally a sequel to Cloverfield.
10 CLOVERFIELD LANE. Was originally a film called VALENCIA that JJ Abrams had produced for a low budget arm of Paramount films. When Paramount shut down the section they had 4 unreleased films from that section. Valencia was one of them. JJ Abrams decided with some extra shots it could be turned into a Cloverfield sequel, So they did.
CLOVERFIELD PARADOX. Was originally a film called GOD PARTICLE. They even advertised it. Fans thought before the producers had even thought about it that it might be a Cloverfield film. It was only when they were in post production JJ Abrams decided they could turn it into a Cloverfield film. Sadly the extra bits cost Paramount and extra $40 million. Paramount knew the film would never make the money back at the cinema, so they did a deal with Netflix.
John Goodman needs to play more villains!! Way too intense!
You left out the thing falling from the sky into the water in the end of “Cloverfield” during the cut showing Rob and Beth on their Coney Island trip!
It was meant to be a satellite that fell and woke up the dormant clover but apparently that was retconned
The monster at the end of 3 is a different one from the original. It's much bigger I believe. It's well above the clouds where the original one was only small skyscraper size. I believe there is meant to be 3 or 4 different universes affected by the Paradox. But I don't really count it as canon. Like you said, it wasnt even written to be a Cloverfield movie. And Cloverfield Lane, even JJ says it's more of a cousin project rather than a sister project since they are that far removed. They are each good movies on their own, but not together. I also wish I could see what Paradox was meant to be. It is an interesting idea for a movie. You can also see a satellite fall into the ocean during the "flashback scenes" at the pier. And the backwards "it's still alive" message at the end of the movie. I wonder what they actually originally were thinking of for sequels.
It’s an weird spider almost see when it was skyscraper size it was because it crawled and when it stands it’s actually large.
@@LandynWilkins no matter how you put it the one from the first one was not getting it's head above the clouds. I forget who made it, maybe CZ, about all the dimensions and stuff from that series and how the paradox affected them all. I believe there's 3 or 4 dimensions affected. But the original Clover monster and the one from the third one are absolutely two different monsters. Guaranteed
No in the third one,they ended up in the future of the first movies universe.
👎
Nope
They did yall need to Watch it again the 2 survivers from the third landed in the ending clocerfield 1 ! In the sea ! U even see it at the end man
@@Lord-Darkness which is an alternate universe because of what happened on the ship
Yep
baby Clover so adorable
There really needs to be more entries in this franchise.
I feel like 10 Cloverfield Lane could have been better if it was a standalone and the twist was there was no apocalypse.
Man i love the first Cloverfield so much, this movie is top 10 in my live, I remember when I watched for the first tim
I always thought the giant Monster at the end of the third movie was one of the parents of Clover, that would have come to search for him.
I would really love if the fourth movie focused some more on the origins of Clover and his parasites.
It's great tht they don't do find footage anymore for the fourth one as the first one sucked. It was too much movement. I was it at the theatre and I came out with a huge headache, hating on the movie because I had to close my eyes mid movie to avoid hurting more. That movie was a nightmare to watch on the big screen. One of the very rare movie I regretted paying big bucks to see it.
My theory is that the monster from the 3rd one is the mother of the one from the original. After the machine in Cloverfield paradox goes off it separates the mother and child. But i don't know why they both went to Manhattan. Maybe because its one of the closest places. Tell me what you think of my theory.
did not know that these vids were related
A Cloverfield 4?That would be awesome❤️
the creature falls from the sky in the background while the two people are on the ferris wheel at the end of the first movie. There was debates about that for years, a few months ago the director or writer confirmed that was the creature falling from the sky.
I’m so happy, I was waiting for if there was going to be a 4th movie
It didn't take a month for Beth to get under a new dude. She was definitely either already hooking up with him or planning on it
I watch when I was 10 the little ones terrorized me
Hell's ya numba 4 can't wait I loved all 3 they were all good in there own way
I agree with you
3 was awful
They really blew it with clover field sequels the first one was so cool I was so hyped for new movies like it would be like aliens or predator but no they completely changed everything we knew about it and did a terrible job at telling the lore the 2nd movie was good but paradox geez man they rlly were just throwing it together it’s funny bc the 2nd one wasn’t even meant to be connected but it was a good movie without being clover field paradox would’ve been bad either way imo
Anyone else get nauseous from the camera work during the movie?
I’ve only seen the first one.... I loved it.
the problem with the explanation of where the monster came from is that;
if it came from the bottom of the ocean, with al the pressure of all that water pressing down on it, if it came to the surface, it would expand, to the point that it would explode, that is why they can't bring living fish up from those depths, the pressure change causes the body to expand, the body expands causing the blood to essentially boil and the gills and brain to become so damaged that it kills the fish or what ever it it is .
Shutup no one cares, it's a movie
Hard to believe Cloverfield is almost 14 years old. Love the franchise. Super 88 used the monster from #1, and in my mind ads it the the series, in that unrelated/related way like the others, almost like a prequel, yet not...unless u want it to be. Lol.
They are completely different....
I've never heard the term "forced perspective " used in that manner. Cool video
why is seabed nectar and slusho left in this video? I mean, thats most important part
"nothing that you have not seen before" means
"You have seen this before'"
In the Coney Island footage from the first movie, there is a “thing” either crashing into the ocean or it is an “activation beam” (ala the alien pods from War of the Worlds).
Hey major question... Is the pod they are on the satilite that falls at the end of the first movie?
I never understood all the hate toward the Cloverfield Paradox, i thought it was a good movie and i really liked the way they chose to build the Cloverfield Saga, using these different stories and working them into eachother into one big narrative.
so tell us why you deleted your video about bone chilling monsters of 2021
Maybe it got taken down.
@@Mxyz no i was being a troll i know what happened they got alot of bad comments towards there video which is there fault because they titled the video wrong and made the video about reviewing and trashing there own list of monsters .. the video was titled bone chilling monsters in movies that need to be watched of 2021 or something like that ..but they make so many mistakes in there videos and when people trash it they get upset and take down there own video or turn it to private so noone can see it but thats all there fault ,if there actually cared about the work they wouldn't be making so many mistakes which leads to people trashing there comment section.. there voice actors dont care about what the script says because they just mispronounce words so easily ...or they dont tell the actors to watch the video on what the topic is for better understanding .. i get they bring 20 minutes of content but the information is some how still wrong for what they say is proper research
@@jimmicks8185 I did not know all of that lol. I've only seen like 5 of their videos.
@@Mxyziv watched alot of there videos i love them as a channel but they dont show proper care ..they just do production send out all the videos we can and say f it to anything we get wrong .. like i can name a few videos and the mistakes they made in ,,,one of the thundercat videos they said the sword of omen is rapier ..not like a broadsword or long sword...they called egon from ghostbusters egan... when everyone knows its egon ..because all you got to do is which any of the movies to know that ...stuff like that which is easy to fix or say right the first time ...and when any calls them out on it.. they ether block them in the comments or delete or private the video's if it gets to much hate ...instead of fixing the issues or preventing them .. which there not doing because they dont say anything to the actors or editors or the script writers
@@jimmicks8185 I've also noticed they copy other people's videos quite a bit
Really good
Such a shame the franchise was wasted and used as a marketing gimmick for random other movies.
27:38 from which movie is that scene taken?
I don't particularly like most of JJ Abrams works, because most of the connections are half-assed after the fact plot points that never existed before the production was actually started. There's too many continuity issues where the audience knows there's something wrong about the story because of previous scenes and missing background story points that were never addressed in a production in the first place. Abrams develops story boards where the climax or major plot points are left out and are added in later, which means it is pointless for a viewer to guess what a mystery is, because the question hasn't been answered by the director, screenwriter, or developer of a film or series ahead of time. That in summary is exactly why you cannot guess the ultimate answer to Abrams works, because he hasn't thought about the answer himself, which is indicated by the lack of story plot scenes that even hint of the resultant outcomes. Now, you realize why the Star Wars trilogy assigned to JJ Abrams to work on was so haphazardly fragmented in plot and continuity problems. That's how JJ Abrams works.
Well said
It gets interesting at 3:00
Before that is padding.
And an ad at 4:20.
ad blocker is new to you??
@@darlito1 how to on iOS?