Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- It's been a while since we've been to Hogwarts. So we went back. Guess what? Still a terrible school with tons of sins. Go figure.
Next week: Holiday sins and sins of something animated.
Remember, no movie is without sin. Which movie's sins do YOU want to see recounted?
Tweet us: / cinemasins
Tumble us: / cinema-sins
Call us: 405-459-7466
Reddit with us: / cinemasins Merch: teespring.com/...
"I'm just saying that if I had been Voldermort in this series,I would have won"
------ Cinema Sins
More like if voldermort had an IQ of over 1...
@@remenencenda768 I mean in the movies he isn't that smart. The book voldemort was a lot more clever about setting himself up. Just so happens Dumbledore is the ultimate plot device and shows Harry everything he needs to find and do. Just now the how and where. One horcrux was not given the proper value it deserved so was easily destroyed (albeit no one realized it yet until the 6th book), the ring nearly cost Dumbledore his life, the locket did cost him his life in the end. The other horcruxes were relatively easier to deal with. Harry was the tricky one since well he had to die to destroy the part of Voldemort's soul. Which is weird given that Nagini was indestructible to all magic except the basilisk venom enhanced sword of gryffindor. But the real idiotic thing he did in the books was try to kill Harry himself instead of his death eaters do the job.
@@Jedda678 perhaps the sheer power of the killing curse is enough to destroy a horecrux. I never though about that though. Harry should have been invincible and repelled all magic his entire life.
Everyone with any common sense would have
• hxney jello • you sure about that that’s probably really mean and I am so sorry
If Liquid Luck is "tricky to make", couldn't one chug Liquid Luck before creating Liquid Luck to reduce the chance of failure? And then mass-produce it?
The wizards in harry potter are surprisingly dumb.
That is so true man wizards are stupid when you think about it.
This reminds me of an Alchemy glitch in Morrowind.
If i remember correctly, abusing Liquid Luck could end up badly for some reason (last time I read the 6th was in 2012, I don't remember correctly :p)
Titomaki Yeah but anyway if it is bad why would you give it to a bunch of kids who are reknown for recreating dangerous potins *Cough Cough* Chamber of Secrets *Cough Cough*
biggest sin: an amazing book about lord Voldemort's origin, revieling Horcruxes and harry learning CRUCIAL information was turned into a whole movie of love-triangle
I hate that they did that
@@lightningvolt3150 the interactions between characters were really good and I loved them while reading the book but they should have had different priorities when making the movie
You just summed it up perfectly
David Yates sucks
@@florinherlea8376 not really related but there was a girl in my class in primary called #%##%# Yates and she said he was her uncle
“Why’d we teleport to outside of the cave professor?”
“For a dramatic camera angle Harry.”
Love it
I know this is a joke but, nerd mode on: There are enchantments whereas you cannot apparate directly inside the cave, otherwise getting the locket would be easy. Instead, Voldemort made a path of rocks you could walk on to get to the cave.
@@Reliavl lol
Fun fact. The cave scene was the only time filming for any of the Harry Potter movies took place outside of the United Kingdom. The caves are based off the Cliffs of Mother in Ireland and were filmed there.
@@Reliavl The books dont matter. Its one of the axioms of Cinemasins. They never explained it, so it made no sense in the movie.
Dumbledore: "Ah, to be young again and feel love's keen sting."
Snape: "Fuck you, Albus."
This is all part of his plan, he's making it as easy as possible for Snape to want him dead.
“All hogwarts students has survived all attempts at murder since year 1” Cedric?
Cedric: am I a joke to you?
end of franchise?
No he was turned into a vampire by Carlisle
all those hogwarts students who die during the war?
Is crying in Parseltongue
"Oh, cool!... What?" is actually everyone's reaction to anything Luna says, ever
yeah pretty much
what?
Huh))
Luna Lovegood Oh sorry, we didn't mean to offend you or anything. No hard feelings?
+J Dude Oh no, of course)))) It's okay;)
The biggest sin of the entire movie is that they had tine for the spider's funeral but not for the Dumbledore's one
Great point! I just watched it again and was thinking "Doesnt the book end with a chapter about a White Tomb?" But the ol spider gets his moment. Lame.
It was actually Moody who said "This conversation is no longer private" because he can see through everything with his magical eye.
Quinn Lyz uhhh it was barty jr
@@sampepper8799 I know but he I am referring to the impostor moody
@@sampepper8799 he had his magical eye.
Quinn Lyz but you said moody when it wasnt him
C MxRazy yea then you should that instead of moody. moody is a person a magical eye is a magical eye
“Hmm. Storm clouds in London. Better go to the window to witness this extremely rare occurrence.” 😂
Yeah, pretty sure it was made up for the series
9:48 you actually reminded me to something that said “I love how Voldemort waits ‘till the end of the year to kill Harry, he cares about his education”
Akselav237 it was the top comment on another Harry Potter sin video
lol ive seen that meme here is the full meme: "I think it's nice that Voldemort always waits until the end of the year to kill Harry. Despite his flaws, Voldemort really cares about Harry's education."
@@zoelestrange128 yup, Harry's education is important then we will kill him and completely counter what we just waited for!
Bravo. Another original comment
Wasn't that from the pitch meeting?
How Voldemort could win-
-in Voldemort's place-
"So, hmm, maybe this would work..."
-scribbles-
'Dear Harry,
Can you please meet me in this forest because I wanna hang out.
-Ginny'
"Perfect!"
Then boom, when Harry shows up, Avada Kedavra that sh*t!
A W E S O M E
Why didn’t Voldy think of this 😂🤣😂
He kinda did that with the whole Sirius thing.
Order of the Phoenix would just deus-ex-machina out of a tree and start an epic battle
Underrated 🤣
So hold on, the invisibility cloak Harry has is a piece of Death's robe, as seen in the next 2 movies. It allowed that one guy to hide from *Death itself* for years.
But those weird invisible things that Luna was talking about can find him under this absurdly powerful cloak? Can Death not see weird little bugs, yet mortal Luna just needs glasses?
+Kellosian It is a movie mistake, in the books he is found by Tonks not Luna, and such bugs don't exist, they were made up for the movie just like the glasses
+Israel Bustamante this is why this one and Order piss me off coz they basically shit on the books!
It would all make sense if they stuck to the books!
Janeway931
I don't think they do, but I have to admit that I hate how they made Luna a silly character and not a misterious one :(
+Kellosian In the 7th book we find out that "Death made the hallows" is just a story, the Peverell brothers actually made the hallows themselves. So he never had Death looking for him.
+Israel Bustamante Actually, the bugs and glasses were in the books(sort of), they're one of Luna's weird fake creatures
calling draco "evil harry potter" is the best thing
Lmao ikr
When?
@@lalithavemireddy7935 wile on a train wen draco is being him self
Or, you know, blonde child Snape.
@lalitha vemireddy when draco
10:05 No, it was Barty Crouch Jr. disguised as Mad-Eye Moody who knew Harry was eavesdropping. A sin for you!
Technically, Barty Crouch, Jr.
I think he was actually talking about in the first movie after Harry breaks into the restricted section.
@@childhoodisthatyou9869 he was
@@childhoodisthatyou9869 In the video, he says that when Snape knew when Harry was nearby he said "This conversation is no longer private", which is what Barty Crouch Jr. disguised as Mad-Eye said in The Goblet of Fire, so it was a mistake on his part.
*DING*
"Oh, cool. What?"
The in universe reaction to Luna.
My raging boner disagrees with you )))
@@SuperFlawless2010 hahaha
@@SuperFlawless2010 or that
Pretty much
My thoughts too!
_"He's one of them."_ is a DOUBLE pronoun game!
"Voldemort split his soul into seven Horcruxes, but he decided that only one of them needed to be an RPG adventure to find."
Hahahahahahaha xD
oh the irony. the hateful fucking irony
The entire movie in 3 lines
Ron-I love Lavender
Snape-I’m the half blood prince
Dunbledore-guess I’ll die.
Conclusion. This movie could’ve been three minutes long
Dunbledore died twice same ammount of times as voldemort
More like: Ron- I want Lavender to leave me alone
Horcruxes being introduced: Are we a joke to you?
LOL actually more like 30 minutes cause Snape speak sooooooooooooooooooo slow, he'll take up 28 minutes just to get to the word 'Prince' 😂🤣
Drarry tension
"Hermione's got nice skin"
What an oddly non-serial-killer thing to say all of a sudden...
Now that you mention it.. it is kind of creepy
Hannibal Lecter went to Hogwarts!
Harry and Ron embracing their inner Buffalo Bill.
@Sarah Collins I'm a guy and I can assure you I never went around saying girls I fancied had nice skin. It's probably what middle aged writers think teenage boys say.
Dennis Reynolds as a wizard.
You never appreciate how many loose ends are tied up by the books until you watch an "Everything Wrong With..."
Kelly Stout no kidding!
The movie doesn't have everything the book has though, watching the movie does not equal to the entire book. For exmaple, Harry in the books didn't snap the Elder Wand, but in the movies, he did.
+CaptainCherryz yeah, but still in the movies they never explain why Harry has to stay with the Dursleys.
CaptainCherryz yeah in the books he returns it to dumbledores grave
Hhaahhahha true
One inconsistency I found is that in this movie, during the ice cream party Prof. Slughorn is hosting, Hermione says her parents are dentists, she has to explain it to to all them like dentistry is an unheard of profession to the magical community but in the first movie you can see at the Weasley home that their is a granfather clock with the faces of each of the Weasley children on a spoon that signal where each of them are and one of the labels the spoons can point to says "dentist".........nitpicky? who? me?
Sultans Of Zing Arthur might have simply added it on there, given his Muggle obsession. Wizards and Witches have no need for dentists because they have magic. Hermione even mentions at one point that her parents don't like the idea of her using magic on her teeth.
Damian Freeman Of course wizards and witches have need for dentists. They'll just call them "teeth healers" or something. Because if they have healers for every other shit, there's no reason why they wouldn't be having healers for teeth.
+Sultans Of Zing you have to remember what arthur weasley was and was fascinated with if being a dentist was infact a muggle thing would it have been wierd for his family to know about it like he loves muggles and so does there family
+Damian Freeman (TheExceeder) That was in the books only
Grim Grin Yes I know. It's why in retrospect I wish Harry Potter could have been a TV Film series so they could fit more details and just all-round be more accurate. It would even allow for more creative character designs, like making Umbridge actually look like a toad-faced woman.
..heck, I'd like an animated series more closely adapting it. But now Warner has Potter in its grip, that probably won't happen to any competent degree.
I know this is three years after this video came out, but I’m still upset about this goddamn movie. It was my absolute favorite book because so much was explained and explored and the movie threw away all the good parts (including the entire Riddle family backstory) just to focus on hormonal teenagers. This could have easily been the best movie of the series and they ruined it.
I lost my shit when they removed Dumbledore visiting the Dursley's and replacing it with a scene at a cafe on a subway. As I was looking forward to seeing it on picture. Unforgivable!
Half Blood Prince is the best book and Prisoner Of Azkaban is the best movie.
Agree
I second your comment
I feel exactly the same.
Agree! I'm re-reading half blood Prince now, and the amount of stuff left out about Voldemort and Snapes back story really annoys me, considering the crap they actually put in!
In the books there WAS an anti-eavesdropping spell, but the movies thought:
“nah, then we have to come up with creative ways of caracters finding out stuff...”
And thats also a sin
Oh yeah! Wasn't it in snape's/the half blood prince's book?
Yeah, it was, and Harry and Ron would use it very often
@@Tristan-eu5uk The books don't matter
John S my point was that the movie writers were lazy
the muffliato spell !!
At 10:18 Snape wasn't the one who said "This conversation is no longer private" It was Moody...
Just sayin'
Saif Khan He made that point in the comment section himself. Unnecessary point is unnecessary. *Ding*
Saif Khan found that out as well.....
-In the Movie, its Snape.-
-In the Books, its Moody.-
Kawaii Pusheen Um... No, it's Moody in the book and movie
So many people in the comments going ''Yeah, you are wrong, the book actually explains that''..
True, but the movie doesn't.
The Book explains most of these undeserving sins. Sign
Yes, I know. But the movie doesn't, and you can't expect every one to have read the books.
Good point hence the 'sign'.
If they don't read the books, they are fine to do that. But complaining about something so minor that *is explained without reading the original source material or doing research is just irrational and stupid.
*in the book or original source material
and the Deleted Scenes
12:40 To be fair, the movies have already shown that magic can be done by accident: snake in the zoo, Aunt Marge, etc.
True...
+Dr Famine this is heavily flawed episode. Aside from calling attention to the same things multiple times, he sins multiple moments because of incorrect interpretation, not because of the story's flaws (and I'm talking about what's shown in the film, not things you need to read the book for) like sinning the fact that no one used the Vanishing Cabinet before when they specifically said he had to mend it first, or sinning the fact that people are trying to find joy in the little things (like cake toppers!) even in the darkest of times. Oh, and every single student has survived every single attempt at murder since year one? Methinks Cedrick might take issue with that incorrect sin.
Cyril Fair enough.
+Cyril meh, the cabinet still doesn't get a pass. What's there nobody available to fix the cabinet at an earlier stage? How about quirrel(maybe too early), how about wormtail, snape or Lucius Malfoy who has regular access to the school because of his official function?
+silentlamb21 It was Draco's idea to mend the cabinet. A Slytherin student had gotten stuck in it (thanks Fred & George), and Malfoy realized that it was the other end of the cabinet in Borgin and Burkes. No other Death Eater/ Voldemort ever knew about the cabinet to utilize it functionally.
Voldemort should’ve just turned 7 random rocks into horcruxes and fly over the ocean chucking them in at random times
🤔hmm, why didn’t he??? 🧐
@@PhantoMace2012 they would have eroded and disintegrated over time. Plus, he had a fascination for fancy objects.
no then water in the ocean would kill him he should of turned some random areas of sand into horcruxes and put the 7 particals of sand in a desert
@@PhantoMace2012 and bc he was arrogant and thought no one would ever find out where/what they were, much less find out about horcruxes themselves
@@AFrogInTheStars sand = victory wen it comes to making horcruxes
I love Ron’s wording in this. He says: “so you and Ginny did it?” Harry’s face makes me crack up every time.
what where???
@@maisiejensseneventing4297 in the movie????
@@franklahache3679 oh ok I never watched the movie
@@maisiejensseneventing4297: Are you kidding me!?! Harry, obsessed over Ginny - Ginny feels the same, based on the 2nd book by the singing Valentine - thought Ron meant... you know... So he asks: "Do what?", & Ron says: "Hide the book"
where?
Why wouldn't voldemort just make a pebble a horcrux and throw it in the sea?
Because Voldemort has a massive ego. He chose things like the diary and the ring because they were important to him or Hogwarts.
Cam Swan
but why?
Because reasons...and he still decided to put a part of his soul into a old diary for no real reason.
Then again, he could have put an horcruxe into the ring and then throw it into the ocean at a random place, it would have worked
The ring was an horcruxe. I think he didn't throw it into the ocean at a random place because he thought of the risk of it being found by someone on a beach because of the ocean currents or in the ocean by a diver. And since it could potentially be harmful to him he decided to hide it somewhere else.
Otherwise, if I remember well the books stated that Voldemort decided to make exactly 6 horcruxes (so separating his soul in 7 parts) because 7 is the number with the most magic power which would have supposedly given him greater powers, and I seem to remember that he used things that were important to him or of great value because of his obsession to be the greatest wizard in history (and because he considered that his soul was too precious for mundane items).
Because the most powerful evil wizard in the world, who was always top of the class, was a hopeless egotistic sentimental sap when he was HIDING PARTS OF HIS SOUL.
Moody, Snape... the point is powerful teachers shouldn't get eavesdropped on. But still, sin on us for mixing up the names of teachers in a franchise we're getting tired of watching.
Right on
Everything wrong with the day after tomorrow! And hurry up!
I shall grant you eternal happiness with this spell:
*Sus-pen-sio nof Disb-eli-ef-abra-b.s.-kadabra*
Please do guardians of the galaxy
Lol nice, I just came down here to comment that xD
"So that means you're carrying around 19 framed pictures to a new place every week?"
No. It means that every week he has to wave a wand a few times and his packing is done for him. Then then again a bit later after instantly apporating to a new place, and his unpacking is done for him.
You'd think CinemaSins had never watched a wizard pack their things before, despite this being the 6th movie in the series.
(I would also be good at CinemaSins)
PS: I loved your use of the Die Hard music for when Dumbledore is falling off of the astronomy tower. Perfect!
How do we know Slughorn isn't using the same spell Hermione will use a year later?
The irony of Rickman sending someone of with that music is perfect as well as mercutio saying a shame on both ur houses.
And he doesn't know the books at all too
I would say 95% of sins were because of poor book adaptation.
95% of this sins are because the books was already poor in first place, Half Blood Prince and The Deadly Hallows are the worst of the saga.
I would say only 50%
Sadistic Unicorn Ha, don't be so whinny and stupid, if you weren't so fucking blind, you would realize that Half Blood Prince and The Deadly Hallows are very developed, the first five books are masterpieces, but the last two are pure crap.
TheKeyser94 They are better than the first two although I would agree books 3-5 are better. In saying that I deeply enjoy the last two which I find both clever and entertaining
You stole the comment i was about to write WORD FOR WORD!
sin 28: (they explain this in the movie its not just a book thing) The Unbreakable Vow isnt unbreakable because you magically have to do it, its unbreakable because if you do break it you die. Vowing to impress Kate Upton with your math skills would be suicide.
here are all the issues with this video... would also like to say im not a potterhead I've never read the books i just know how to pay attention...
the vanishing cabinet was broken thats why it took a while to use and was a last resort!
moody is the one who said the conversation was no longer private not snape
unbreakable vows CAN be broken they will just kill the breaker... it literally says that
it has been know for a LONG while that wizards can accidentally cause magic when emotional ... harry does it many times in the first 3 books... also its been known many spells don't HAVE to be spoken if practiced... the more powerful a magician is the more he can do wandless aswell
the room of requirement will change appearance to fit the users needs... also clarified many times
its very clear the cave where the hocrux is is heavily enchanted meaning u cannot apparate and you cannot create a boat... thats why they had to make a blood sacrifice
dumbledore saw slughorn because of the dragons blood on the ceiling and this was also clarified in film
the memories are magic spells not the literal thing you saw and heard, but what actually happened... thats why you saw it in third person
CINEMA SINS.... They're addressing the film adaptation only. Films are made to draw more than just those who have read the books, that's why they often assign a sin of "the books don't matter". It's laziness on the filmmaker's part to tell people to read the book to get an idea explanation of something left unexplained by the movie.
everything i said was all in the movie, i havent read the books.... also hahayourfunny94
clarified that it was in the movie aswell mate
No you're have to do that. It's sort of like luck potion, events all happen for your little endeavour.
+Jason Long that and big film corporations want to milk big franchises, why do you think Pirates of the carribean was a film?
"go to hufflepuff to stick your slytherin in someones gryffindor"
cRying
manikaaa why is R caps
255 likes 2 comments
But don’t forget to shave your Ravenclaw
Hashim ThaDream just, leave ravenclaw out of that, they don't wanna know what went on here
IM LITTERY CRYING OMG WTF 😭😭😭😭
"Surely there's a spell that could make you forget something completely."
Its not like that was a majot plot point in the second movoe or anything
its also mentioned in fantastic beasts which is in the same world as the harry potter world
"Luna is the Lada Gaga of this group"
😂😂😂
id start each HP video with 100 sins for the quidditch rules off the bat
+youweechube whats wrong with quidditch rules though?
cloth because most of the players in the game are trying to score goals for 10 points IIRC... but if someone gets the snitch its 100 points, so it kinda makes the goal scoring (which most of the players are trying to get - apart from the seekers) redundant
***** ha it actually wasnt !
youweechube to win the cup they actually have to have more points overall from all matches combined, so lets say ravenclaw has 320 points overall, and gryffindor has 150. simply catching the snitch would not bring them victory, as it only gives 150 points, they would have to score at least 3 times more than ravenclaw. also only the seeker can catch the snitch
+youweechube In the Quidditch world cup Ireland beat Bulgaria even though Krum caught the snitch. The score does matter.
The Harry Potter ones are always the one I dislike the most because they're grasping for straws throughout the whole thing. My biggest issue this time was the complaint about the Room of Requirement being different when they have expressly said it becomes what you need it to be. In this case, it's a room where students have gotten rid of unwanted items for decades. The other thing that bothered me was everything about the vanishing cabinet. It was broken and Malfoy had to learn how to repair it. It's not super well explained in the movies, but it's not like it's not hinted at all.
***** They said it's hinted at in the movie... And that's putting it nicely really! My brother never read the books and he understood all of this...
a movie has to be able to stand on its own without the source material... if it fails to do so its a bad movie... plain and simple
this was not grasping at straws at all, these films are a big mess
*****
They say it very clearly in the 5th movie. Hermione says "it is equip with the seekers needs".
I did read all the books, but I know how these guys are so my arguments here was from a movie standpoint only. While the books are much better at explaining this stuff, the movies still do and a person's inability to understand a concept is not due to the movie but due to stupidity. My argument still rings true.
"Leaving the Assassination to Draco, who thought this was a good idea?"
It wasn', Draco was supposed to fail and then Voldemort would kill him. It was supposed to be Voldemort's revenge to Lucius for the Ministry of Magic fiasco and for losing Riddle's diary. Dumbledore and Snape saved Draco's life.
And his soul! Dumbledore’s main argument for Snape to do it was to prevent the damage a murder would cause to Draco’s soul.
why does the most evil wizard in the world need such a convoluted excuse to kill the kid? Just kill him!
@@amodelmannequin Well, in the book it's clear that this was a way more cruel way of killing Draco. Draco gets thinner as the year goes by, becomes lonelier and anxious because Voldemort not only threatened him but his mother as well. Voldemort, in the end, wanted to get the Malfoys out of his way because he knew they were no longer true allies, Lucius had become too comfortable as a rich and influential figure in the magical world and no longer saw a reason for Death Eater activity. Also, having Draco fail meant that Voldemort would order Snape to do it which is what Voldemort wanted, to kill Dumbledore (whom he feared) and to truly test Snape's loyalty once and for all.
"What if that had been poop?" I died 😂😂😂
Yes!
When was that?
*****
Oh i dont usually listen to those so thats why i didnt remember it from the video
3:05 it sounds like in that scene Bellatrix is trying to do ASMR
😂
Yeah, I found her voice so annoying
Speaking of chemistry, there actually WAS SOME between Harry and Hermione throughout the movie series. Just think Prisoner of Azkaban rescue, Goblet of Fire brainstorming sessions and Deathly Hallows when they were left alone. And she got Ron because... pairing.
Actually the performers Dan and Emma had a lot of natural onscreen chemistry with each other which is a problem, because their chemistry overshadowed Hr/R and H/G. I consider Ron's actor to be the best among the trio but his chemistry with Emma seemed incredibly forced, while the actress for Ginny is more wooden than Kristen Stewart and had absolutely no chemistry with Dan.
ThePeteralonzo83
So, what you're saying is they're bad actors? :p
To be fair JK has often claimed that having Hermione go with Ron instead of Harry was one of her biggest regrets with this series. Though to be fair I don't know what exactly the thought process was anyway.
Sean Black At first I would say that too, but if Harry went with Hermione, who would Ron and Ginny marry? Lavender and Malfoy???
Amy DeVaughan Well first of all Ginny legitimately doesn't have a part outside of having a relationship with Harry so I don't think anyone would care. And as for Ron he technically doesn't need to end up with anyone. Especially if they set up chemistry for two people only to say they don't get together because Ron needs someone.
He should have removed a sin for the casting of Bellatrix LeStrange. Helena Bonham Carter is the perfect choice to play her and her acting to portray an insane witch is bloody incredible and doesn't get enough credit
She wasn't quite as I'd pictured her, but I thought she did a marvellous job. I really wish footage of any of Helen McCrory's footage as Bellatrix was available.
Uh... no. Helena Bonham Carter only knows how to play one character over and over again. She's good, but literally the same in every movie. Like the chap from "Superbad" who plays opposite Jonah Hill. Funny i guess, but no difference in any role he ever played.
Tony Perez i mean that doesnt really matter though. just because an actress has done similar characters doesnt mean her performance doesn't elevate a movie or that she is perfect for the role
Plus Helena loves to play weird and crazy woman so maybe that's why?
And thats why shes my favorite character in the movies
To everyone saying "Most of these sins are explained in the books", a stand alone movie should be able to hold up as an adaptation without needing you to go ahead and read the book. If they expect you to read the book to get the full story, then there's no point to having a movie.
CheesyGranola Funny thing is the first 2 minutes of Sins are NOT from the book! lol It's specific to the movie, because the scenes were not from the book
CheesyGranola But for the "Recipe for Death" I can understand why the school wouldn't want to literally give instructions on how to kill other people, especially with high school students and hormones.
I learned to love the Harry Potter movie series when I stopped seeing it as a movie series and more like "visual guides" for the proper book story, in a way the book itself depends on the movie and not the other way around.
Still rubbish movies though.
MrRiddleCT I don't see how the books themselves depend on the movies. In fact many of the things the movies depict actually contradict the books (the uniforms, for example).
Yeah, it's more like a little support. A guide with mistakes or something like that.
I'm not much of an imaginative person, so when I read any of the books, I usually picture them in my head as a movie with the directing identity of what Warner Bros did to that specific installment.
CinemaSins bring up a good point. Why would someone like HERMIONE GRANGER want to date someone like..well..Ron? What does he have going for him? He's immature to a fault, can't mind his own goddamn business, is a bleeding hypocrite when it comes to romance, has no special talent worth mentioning whatsoever, (there's a reason why he's got that massive inferiority complex), and is the very essence of mediocrity. I just can't figure out why ANYONE would like this dude, especially if they look like Emma Watson and have the brains of Hermione Granger.
People tell me that Ron's special because he's "loyal". Please. Who ditched Harry in the fourth book because he thought Harry had conned the goblet, rather than that someone was trying to actively kill him? Ron. Who abandoned Harry and Hermione in the seventh book because he just couldn't handle camping out and having a shitty locket? Ron. Dumbledore even *specifically* gave Ron a tool to help him find his way back to Harry and Hermione because he knew Ron would ditch them. Ron's ditched people more than anyone in the series has ditched anyone else, ever. If that's "loyal" then I'll eat my left foot.
Why does everybody end everything with some variation of promising to cause bodily harm to themselves? That just makes me wanna prove them wrong so we can actually get them to cause themselves bodily harm.
You could call me an asshole for wanting to see that happen, but then I'll retort by calling you an idiot for making the incredibly dumb proposal in the first place.
who cares? Harrys banging his best mates sister
ELiTE x OPZ his sister is an individual who can make her own choices. If Ron can hook up with Lavender then he can shut the fuck up about Ginny's dating life.
C Dub If the best comeback you can bring to me is peddling semantics of figures of speech, then I can only conclude that you're new to youtube.
Andrew Wang You can go ahead and believe that all you want.
He said he’d do a “Merlin’s Beard” bonus round if Slughorn said it one more time, but then he narrates over the next time he does it. DING!
"Draco always have an apple on hand, just in case he needs to eat it"
Drapple is amazing
"It's RON WEASLEY"
My thoughts exactly when I first watched it.
I don't get it
Nah, I ship ronmione
no there is an anti evesdropping spell, its called muffliato
Orextritin then the sin would be why didn’t they use it
No the anti eavesdropping spell is the killing curse
Actually Harry, Ron & Hermione are one of the only people that know how to do the spell along with the Half-Blood Prince
Yeah but you only know about it if you read the books. Certain people didn't unfortunately
Books don't matter at CinemaSins dude
Though you did this video forever ago, just one small note. Snape didn't say that line in the 4th movie about the conversation no longer being private. It was Mad Eye Moody who said it so it makes sense that he wouldn't know Harry was eavesdropping.
+Marcus Graham It also makes sense because Mad Eye actually has a magical eye.
+Marcus Graham timestamp please
+Aaron Page 10:05
+Marcus Graham I know that annoyed me so much!!
+jdchen003 okay I see your meaning, the narrator did make a bad mistake about lines
I thought misusing the word racist was his biggest sin
Slughorn does travel with all his photos. It shows how he prioritizes his connections and prides himself on finding and nurturing talented people, even over his own convenience.
Tonks was the one who found Harry on the train in the books, and it's because she was watching for Harry and didn't see him leave the train.
The sorting hat always gives a speech, Harry is just usually off doing things like getting his car stuck in a tree and misses it every year, or the movies cut it out because nobody really needs to see it.
If you drink liquid luck too often, bad things happen. It's toxic in high doses and makes you giddy, overconfident and reckless.
Dumbledore's memory doesn't have to be vivid upon regular recall. That's why the pensieve is so important. When you extract the memories and view them in it, you can see all the little details the fallible human mind can't focus on.
Wands focus magical energy and are a powerful tool. However, there are entire cultures where witches and wizards practice wandless magic, such as Native American wizarding communities, and it's definitely possible even for wizards who typically use wands.
Tom Riddle was a sociopath. He wanted the full benefit of a magical education, read Dumbledore's body language and noted that even a powerful wizard didn't think his methods and demeanor were cool. So he made sure to reinvent himself before school started. Sociopaths have a remarkable ability to turn on the charm. Also, given Slughorn's surprise at the way Tom was acting in his memory, it's clear it was out of the ordinary for him at that time. We only got to see glimpses of Tom Riddle when he wasn't being careful to conceal himself. He was too excited and forgot to act innocent.
There is no such phrase as "on accident". It's "by accident".
Making an unbreakable vow doesn't mean that what you vowed will automatically happen. It just means you'd better try your darndest to do the thing, because if you don't complete your task you die.
Snape made Dumbledore promise to never reveal the real reason he decided to work for good. Dumbledore isn't the best at revealing things at the best of times. He certainly wouldn't go out of his way to betray Snape's confidence just to set some peoples' minds at ease.
The Vanishing cabinet appeared much earlier in an offhand comment in the books, as did many other magical objects that would become important later, like the diadem and the locket. It's one of the many reasons that the books are praised so highly for their world-building.
It isn't coincidence that Harry keeps finding Draco, he's stalking him using the Map.
Draco isn't experimenting with the cabinet, he's fixing it. It was badly broken, which is why somebody threw it in the room of requirement. Which, by the way appears in many forms according to the user's needs. Its catch-all storage space form appears to anybody who needs to hide something or throw something away, and people have been getting rid of things in there for centuries. And the room doesn't see good and evil, it only sees need. And Draco badly needed to fix that cabinet or risk Voldemort's wrath. He's in full-on panic mode the whole second half of the movie. To get in, you have to know where it typically appears, and walk past it three times while thinking very hard about what you require. Neville found it by accident while pacing, and everybody else (including Draco) can find it now by repeating what he did.
Dumbledore knew Voldemort split his soul multiple times and why, but he wanted confirmation, and he wanted to know exactly how many times. He was surprised to learn it was seven because even he didn't think Voldemort was that awful.
The cave had a spell on it that prevented regular magical spells like conjuring boats, apparating or summoning water.
Muffliato is the anti-eavesdropping spell, but in the heat of the moment one forgets. In the book Dumbledore also put a body-bind curse on Harry to prevent him from interfering in his death.
When Snape and Dumbledore make their plans, Dumbledore mentions he doesn't want Draco's soul split. When Snape asks Dumbledore why he isn't worried about Snape's soul, Dumbledore points out that the "murder" would instead be an act of mercy since Dumbledore is dying a slow and painful death already. Draco might not know this, but Snape does, and intentions affect magic.
Rebecca Maracle I appreciate your comment.
Gr8..👍👍
K
I really hope you were a game of thrones fan, I know how much that last season would have killed you
@Fetal Alcohol Syndrome that's racist
+1 sin
This is my least favorite HP movie, but these criticisms have a few flaws.
- That's not how unbreakable vows work.
- Liquid luck is poisonous in high doses and also takes a REALLY long time to make.
- Seeing memories in vivid detail is KIND OF THE POINT OF A PENSIEVE. because you can't see those kinds of details when you're just recalling it in your head.
- The spectator turnout is so big for the Gryffindor tryouts because HARRY POTTER, THE CHOSEN ONE WHO IS ALL OVER THE MEDIA is now team captain. You don't even have to read the book to figure that one out.
- McLaggen is also the biggest douche in all of Hogwarts, which is why he asks Ron to introduce them.
- Hermione has her wand hidden. She's holding it low so it's not in the shot.
- You forgot "Why is Hermione acting like she's a bit tipsy? She's a minor and Butterbeer is non-alcoholic."
- None of these students with magical powers do anything when this girl is hovering in the air because they are STUDENTS and this is OBVIOUSLY dark magic. Trying to do something would probably just make the situation worse. Also, let's see you keep you wits about you and think of a helpful spell when a girl has just been hoisted into the air by some unknown force.
- The cabinet was broken (As draco later says).
- Wrong - that was Crouch Jr. disguised as Moody
- Wouldn't you want a dancing cake topper to brighten things up if your society was on the brink of war?
- Yeah, wizards producing magic un-intentionally totally didn't happen in the first movie when harry made that glass disappear
- The Room of Requiremnt is always equipped with whatever a person may need. The room they are in there is a facet of the RoR which exists SPECIFICALLY for people to stash illicit items. That's the accumulated junk of probably over 1,000 years.
Yes because he really needed it IT'S THE ROOM OF REQUIREMENT IT'S SOLE PURPOSE IS TO ONLY APPEAR WHEN SOMEONE REALLY NEEDS IT.
- Yeah because Voldemort would totes have not put an anti-apparition enchantment on his cave where he's hidden part of his soul.
- Augamenti wouldn't have worked. because SECURITY ENCHANTMENTS
- It wasn't a good idea. Voldemort knew Draco would fail so he could kill draco and further cause his disgraced family distress because he's a sadistic bastard.
- The splitting of the soul doesn't JUST happen. It has to happen in order for a horcrux to be made, but it has to be intentional.
- You also forgot the biggest hole in this entire movie (and this is personal for me, because if I had a galleon for every time I was asked this I could buy a years supply of chocolate frogs THEY NEVER EXPLAIN WHY SNAPE IS CALLED THE HALF BLOOD PRINCE. books orno books i think that bears some kind of bsck story or explanation. Otherwise it is totally random. That's a Cinema Sin if ever I saw one.
I know why Snape is called the Half-Blood Prince. But I pointed that out from the perspective of someone who hasn't read the books and who wouldn't know what Snape's Mother's maiden name was because they never deigned to expound upon that in the movie. Which is why it's a movie sin.
The on correction I would point out is: The splitting of one souls happens when you commit murder which is why murder is required to create a horcrux..
In fact, in the books Harry tried several times to use the Augamenti spell in the cave. It slips out of the cup through the bottom as though the cup doesn't exist. It would most likely be the same if he cupped his hands.
granted the guy in the video said 'use the aguementi spell straight into dumbledore's mouth" but I don't that would have worked for anyone who drank that potion either. Plus, in the book he's using an actual goblet that dumbledore conjured and not some dumb-ass shell that is CLEARLY made of plastic; CLEARLY bad on you props department.
I love you for this list *.* Thanks :)
QUIDDITCH. IS. IMPORTANT. They didn't have enough Quidditch damn it! I want to see a MOVIE about Quidditch! I want to have a ENTIRE MOVIE about the Quidditch Cup! I'D WATCH a movie about Quidditch! Only a Quidditch Match !
For me, those were the most boring parts of the movie honestly :)
The Duke But when you know the rules of Quidditch and such, you enjoy them more x')
Same here! I wish I could see a whole movie about Quidditch xD
well we got a game on Game Cube which I found rather enjoyable :)
speccyninja I don't have this game ;_;
Everyone knows Harry and Hermione were meant for each other,its so clear in the books and early movies. Even JK Rowling said it was a mistake putting Ron and Hermione together. But whatever I love these movies and books, they were a big staple in my childhood.
The most stupid mistake that Rowling ever made.
She didn't say that. she said they'll need counseling in the future (after fans bitching about the pairing btw) while talking hypothetically about Hermione and Harry as a couple.
in one of her early interviews she said they didn't like when the hero get the other woman in the team so she would have never put them together
Marica Mucci She was being polite, and that didn't stop the massive storm that caused the fanbase, never the less, all is say and done, Rowling ended the saga making crap of the two last books, and not matter how politely she had say it, it nothing that she could fix that, both sides are very angry at her at the moment, and her clumsy attempt to reach our side come out more than insult than a amend.
Marica Mucci A few months ago she explicitly stated it was a mistake pairing the characters the way that she did. She said she put Ron and Hermione together because putting Harry and Hermione would have left Ron out.
notforvideos I would liked that she had followed the original idea and had killed Ron or Harry, but most likely Ron.
Could we get a sin of for Draco in the all-black suit? Because that almost took my breath away like a dementor
Saaaaame
I mean-
*then probably a sin off for Tom Riddle too because I mean look at that, just look at that.*
Also it is entirely unfair that his mother gets to look that goddamn attractive like-- O_O
They didn't properly explain that the luck potion can get super addictive and have really bad side effects that can get you killed, hence why he's only made a tiny bit... The film really just sucks. The broken vanishing cabinet was introduced in the second book
+Tim Carter People should know most of the times movies based on books aren't so good...you can't really fit 700+ pages into a 2 hour movie.
+Carlos Arteaga you can, most of books are merely discriptive
+Carlos Arteaga You could perhaps turn the book to multiple movies...like they did for The Deathly Hallows
+Tim Carter even so, Voldemort should've drunk it at least once, why not ?
Half-Blood Prince is, in my opinion, the worst of the series. And which did I think was the best in the series? Chamber of Secrets.
Take the luck potion then make more luck potion can't go wrong
Good point!
Damn never thought about that
luck potion take six months to simmer
+TacoTalk make a giant pile of it and
Lock it up
TacoTalk Drink a little to start with, then take more after the six months to finish it off
The liquid luck potion is the stupides thing in the universe already as it is but not the least because it indeed utterly hurts the whole storyline, for the reasons mentioned in this video. If it hadn't been made a crucial and unavoidable part of the sixth book's plot, I would totally remove its existence in my fanfiction universe. But as it is, I can't and have to just ignore it while it exists.
Don't get me wrong, I love the HP books and universe, I live and breathe them and I love Rowling for writing them. But it doesn't mean I have to like everything she wrote into them. The liquid luck is just so lazy and unnescessary part of the universe and story.
Just like the time turner. Seriously, both of these items combined in the hands of any wizard and the whole story falls on itself. Blargh.
metea11 Yeah, they didn't know ho to work them in the movies. In the books it is explained why both of these are not used as often as they would appear (there are side effects to everything), but that explanation was missing in the movies... I don't know why, it literally would have taken them seconds to fit it in... directors these days, man.
yeah that luck potion is almost as dumb as the fact that hogwarts has a time machine and uses it for the most retarded and useless thing imaginable... its like doctor who using his Tardis exclusively to return overdue library books before they were overdue
And the potion to make people say the true too
Well, Felix Felicis is extremely hard to make, only really good potion master, like slughorn can make it (something that Snape and Voldemort can't, don't know about Dumbledore), besides Voldemort would never use it, as he is so much of an egotistical ass, that he wouldn't depend on anything other than himself to win. Also, with the time turner, there still exists a dicotomy about time travel in their world, that's is why time travel is extremely restricted in the magic world, only used in mundane stuff and given to certain people, that is, until the battle of Ministry of Magic, when all the time turners in existence were destroyed (omitted in the movies, so it doesn't cpunt there, though) and Dumbledore had a thing against changing majot events in the time travel. Also, veritaserum is prohibited and only used against criminals.
Why don't they just make all the kids take the unbreakable vow to never use the magic they're taught for evil?
because that would be violating their right to freedom of choice...
Also because the unbreakable vow is a dark spell itself
Sometimes u need to defend yourself with Dark Magic, it is usefull sometimes like...Cruciatus Curse. Pay a bug for coming near you. Imperius Curse, Control teachers to teach something you want. Killing Curse, well..Bugs! Bugs!
Colin Timp because it kills you? That’s like saying normal school kids should be killed for sticking gum under their desks
@@eevaneee Yeah, because this world seems to care sooo much about freedoms...
We need to see the Quidditch matches because YOU CAN'T CANCEL QUIDDITCH
What is about in chamber of secrets ??
The match against huffed puff was cancelled
She was being sarcastic, Felix. In the very scene to which you are referring, Oliver Wood says to McGonagall, "You can't cancel Quidditch!"
That's more of a reference than sarcasm. :D
#wood4wood
Wood would kill them, if Quidditch would be canceled.
IKR, I HATED THAT THE QUIDDITCH MATCH IN POA WASN'T IN THE MOVIE. I mean, THEY WON THE QUIDDITCH CUP, NOW'S THE TIME TO SHOW THE QUIDDITCH MATCH PEOPLE.
I feel like a number of the sins here were counted due to lack of understanding, but then I also read the books before seeing the movies so maybe I've got more background info than your average Joe.
No, you don't have more background info of the movies. You have more background info of the books, which are not the same thing.
I didn't specify which. watching the movie, I had more background info on the story, because more of the story is explained in the book. they're supposed to be the same story regardless of media, or at least, that's often the goal with movies like this.
Hunter Wall That's what I said. What you read in the book has no bearing on the movie. A movie is a visual medium, you watch it not read it. The film isn't a spin off from the book, it's a completely new take on the story. The events of the book are not the events in the movie. You cannot "explain" an error in a movie by sourcing a book. If you have to go away and read extra material to clarify a plot point then the movie failed with that plot point.
Hunter Wall You know more about the books than about CinemaSins, so that's why you don't know that they say with their videos THE BOOKS DON'T COUNT
I haven't read the books and I liked the movies when I was a kid, but they're just okay now to me. But yeah, I feel like I'd like the story a lot more if I read the books because there's a lot in the movies that is either hard to remember, or I feel like they left important stuff out. I forgot Sirius died when I saw Deathly Hallows pt. 1 because his death wasn't even given as much time as the stupid spider funeral.
Ginny just goes through the fire like Tra-la-la are u fuckin kiddin me? Lel good one :D
Yes! That line was hilarious!
What? Why am I a bitch?
And i dont understand why everyone afraid of voldemort bcoz everyone can split their soul in 7 or more objects by learning in hogwarts.....if harry can kill voldemort then why not hermaone cant bcoz she is better wizard then harry also dumbledore can kill him.....its magical world so everyone should have been do it which voldemort did.
Le Cypher Tra la la...LOL
I DID wonder about that. If killing someone makes your soul split, would it still split if you and the person you're killing had a mutual agreement beforehand?
The reason Snape's soul didn't split after he killed Dumbledore was because Dumbledore was already dying and asked Snape to put him out of his misery and also to kill him to save Draco. It was a mercy killing and done out of love and respect with no malice involved. It wasn't something Snape wanted to do but promised Dumbledore that he would do. There was no cruelty involved, thus Snape's soul didn't split. The book covers it, but unfortunately the movie doesn't do that well at all. The movie really is an awful representation of the book.
@@VenusFlytrap7 Also, in the books it says that remorse can heal your soul after it's split, so it's probably the same when you don't want to kill in the first place.
Probably not. Splitting your soul requires a truly evil act (murder), and what Snape did was basically assisted suicide (which isn't really an evil act)
*Snape would be excellent at Dignitas* DING@@RokuHanmar
Funny, but arguably somewhat inaccurate in some places. Now, I'm not an expert on Harry Potter but for example, if I'm not mistaken the vanishing cabinet was originally broken and that's why he had to test it. Plus, it's really not that crazy Dumbledore wouldn't tell everyone everything in a world where mind reading is a thing. Keeping your cards close to your chest and telling people things only on a need to know basis is often not a bad idea, if a bit Machiavellian. Slughorn saying that Voldemort's monster was buried deep down was also later revealed to be him just being evasive. And not doing anything with the cursed girl, well... yes they know magic, but they're only young students. It's not that crazy to think they wouldn't know the right spells to coutneract whatever was happening or being able to figure out what WAS happening.
Also, magic NEVER had to be done on purpose to happen. Plus, the snow was more an existing spell interacting with an emotion, near as I can figure.
Well, these guys just base their issues on the movies. they've said it before, the books don't matter. if it's not specified in the movie, it's not something they take into account
Sara Nasreen I haven't read the books.
+OneOnOne1162 Eh it's been a while since I've seen the movies and I hated movie six. You're pretty observant. Also, these guys are assholes. They will literally sin a logo just cause
Sara Nasreen Well, I haven't seen the movies (except for athe final two) in a long time either, so it's possible at least that I picked it up elsewhere. Plus, I mean much of what I said is just logically thinking through shit.
Well, I think their main thing is that they try to be entertaining, but in the process I think they often place "oh I came up with a good joke" above "oh, I came up with a way in which this makes sense after all."
Good point, however most of this is only said in the books. So this video articulates how a lot of films that adaptations don't make as much sense if you haven't read the book.
Holy shit how can people still not understand this? The books don't fucking matter, the movie should stand on it's on, it's not a companion thing or whatever, it's a standalone product, so before you start bitching about this and say the book explained it, think again
I partly agree and disagree. The problem is when a movie is bad and a book really good. People who don't read books are going to be let down by the movie but have no idea that there's still a really good book to read so they won't even like the story or this fictional universe overall.
supershinigami1
Movies are stand-alone. If you need to read the books to understand something in the MOVIE, then the MOVIE did it wrong. It doesn't matter if the book explains it or not.
AzureRoxe but then it means the movies ALWAYS do something wrong. The movies NEVER explain everything but something of it could be very important
***** Well I can agree with you on that
Well CinemaSins does it as well so why couldn't we. Can't remember what video was it, maybe one of the HP or LotR ones, that he even says that you can't use the books and continues to use arguments like "Book says this, but movie says this, ding" So you must follow your own rules for them to matter.
However I totally agree that the books and movies are separate and you should not have read the books to understand the movie. The movie should always explain itself unless it deliberately doesn't want to. And if it doesn't then it's bad writing or stroy telling.
Besides movies and books totally different art forms anyway. (well not totally different but you get the point) They tell and can tell stories very differently. In movies you can use visual images to convey ideas. In books you can use mind reading more easily. So some things you have to leave out or change cause they don't make sense in movies or vice versa.
IT"S RON WEASLY!! lmao
"if i was voldemort in this series i would have won." Everyone would have have won if theyd been voldemort, i wouldn't have even used a curse on baby harry. I'd have just put a few pillows over his face, and walked away.
Or not attack him as a baby, especially if there are two candidates to be the chosen one. How could he do anything as a baby? He can be killed much later.
@@leventebardossy5962 Curse of Foresight. If you think you can stop a prophecy, you create it
@indefinableification No, you would've done that if you had the knowledge that Harry would survive. If (like Voldemort) you didn't, and (like Voldemort) you have a weapon that kills literally everything it's hit since it was created with no chance of surviving, you probably wouldn't try to smother the defenceless baby, you'd attack with your 'unbeatable' (as far as you know) weapon
That sin for the wrackspurts was shitty. Everyone knows Luna is crazy, you can't sin the odd girl for being odd.
The textbook's recipe isn't wrong necessarily, it's just that the half-blood prince's revisions make the potion brewing easier. It's like taking a short cut.
Why the potion isn't used all the time: "Brewed correctly the drinker of this potion will be lucky in all their endeavours, but be warned … excessive consumption is highly toxic and can cause extreme recklessness."
And Voldemort had to make a passage to access the Horcrux because like the Journal from the Chamber of Secrets, it has to be found by someone to restore him. If he locks it up for no one to access he wouldn't be able to get out of the Horcrux, or wherever it is locked up.
And everyone knows Michael Bay loves his product placement, explosions, and blatant 'MURICA symbolism, but nobody freaked out when Cinemasins put hundreds of sins into those.
RikoZerame but those are actually sins of cinema, not parts of the story.
TikiArts Things like cliches are not sins. What does that even mean? You can only use something once, and then it becomes a cliche?
I liked cinema sins when it was some nicely caught errors in the production or something, not make-believe actions that can be interpreted differently by everyone.
RikoZerame
Sinning gratuitous explosions in Michael Bay films is funny.
Sinning "missing explainations" that aren't actually missing is dishonest.
(And before anyone gives me the "the books don't count" routine, I am talking about explainations given in the movie itself, that CinemaSins just saw fit to pretend weren't there).
Vuzela You have seen a Michael Bay film, right? His films are the definition of cinema sin - though this is not particularly relevant. The point I was making is that the majority of the sins pointed out in this video are easily explained within the story by anyone who payed attention to the movie, even those like me who haven't read the books.
1. An unbreakable vow can't aid you in your task, only kill you if you don't complete it.
2. It's specified in the book that Liquid Luck can only be used a few times in a single person's lifetime.
3. Wandless magic has always been possible, only harder and less powerful.
4. There must've been a Death Eater at the other vanishing cabinet which was who bit the apple and sent it back, otherwise how would Draco ever know it had arrived?
5. It's specified later on in the movie Draco was fixing the vanishing cabinet, which is why it needed testing.
6. In the Goblet of Fire it was Mad-eye Moody (or Barty Crouch Jr.) who said "this conversation is no longer private", not Snape.
7. No, they can't just magic up a new house, if they could that would be in the sin-count.
8. You're questioning why Ron doesn't need to intend to make it snow to make it snow, while he's sitting below a magic ceiling with changing weather.
9. The room of requirement contains whatever you need, therefore if you need somewhere to learn to fight, it contains books on the subject and training dummies, while if you need to hide something it reveals a room in which people have hidden things before, which is where Draco could find a hidden vanishing cabinet.
10. Yes, the Patronus Charm is strictly for Dementors. No, it couldn't help in this situation too.
Video Sin Tally: 10
Sentence: Split it in SEVEN!!!
I'm willing to bet that this guy didn't even read any of the books
No, but proper research should be done regardless and There were things explained in the film that were still sinned.
Good storytelling also entails that you trust your audience. No good film ever has everything spoonfed to viewers.
Patronus has other uses; I know Tonks used it to send a short range message
2. Liquid Luck can be used as much as desired. Slughorn explains that it just has bad side effects taken in excess. "It is meant to be used sparingly, however, as it causes giddiness, recklessness, and dangerous overconfidence if taken in excess."
3. It is not specified that it's less powerful. "It could be volatile and was often difficult to perform, and could thus only be reliably accomplished by witches and wizards of great skill."
10. Patronuses could be used to communicate, as Dumbledore and Tonks did in the books. And also during wedding in the 7th movie.
Wow, loads of fans of Harry Potter love the idea of Harry and Hermione together. I feel like the only person who don't and I feel like Harry Potter and Ginny Weasley were obviously the better match.
What bugs me is that Ginny Weasley is always looked as a fangirl and "Ronald Weasleys little sister." This is true in some forms, but overall, you guys are wrong. Ginny Weasley always gets underestimated. She has six older brother for goodness sakes and because of that SHE IS the forgotten child. Can anyone actually admit you have ever been underestimated before? She, in my opinion, is a true example of women these days. Underestimated. Harry and Hermione shippers at least admit that. She always get underestimated. When she was little, she loved the IDEA of Harry Potter, not Harry Potter himself. Obviously in the human world we have our own crushes of celebrities. Justin Timberlake or even
One Direction. Why should Ginny Weasley be any different? She is the one that makes Harry opens his eyes that he is not only one to be possessed by Voldy, she is defends him for his use of the Setrumsempra (misspelt I know) spell while Hermione kept on yelling him and making him feel even more guilty, she is the one that tells him how to communicate to Sirius Black on Order of the Pheonix. By the books and movies, she grew maturer. She started of in Chamber of Secrets wearing her clothes that her mum knitted to the Deathly Hallows Part 1 where she is seen wearing a cocktail dress. Harry and Ginny have more in common then you think. They both have been possessed by Voldy, they both love Quidditch, they both have a sense of humour and there both passionate. I love Ginny Weasley as a character. When Harry broke up with her for her own safety she did not cry. She accepted his decision. For me, I would of felt sympathy of Ginny, all of this time Harry loved her and they can't be together. Hermione meanwhile, (no offence to the Hermione character) had recently been crying because Ron kissed Lavander and not her? In the Deathly Hallows, Harry missed Ginny. It had felt like a heartache, he watched over her dot on the Maruaders Map hoping she would be safe, and SHE IS THE LAST THOUGHT HARRY THOUGHT WHEN HE DIED.
Honestly, I love Harry Potter. I watch all the movies more than ten times each and read the book more then twenty time each and recently I went Harry Potter world in Watford. For me, and there is more argument for this then any other Harry Potter topic, is the poor way how to film got adapted. There was so much elements, including Ginny Weasley that could have been added to the movies. In the books, particular the first book, Harry and Hermione DO NOT HAVE CHEMISTRY. When Ron and Hermione had fights, he would mostly be on Ronald side than Hermione. In the Half Blood Prince book, Harry had tried to stop Ron harming his sister and even loved her so much that in Deathly Hallows, when he saw Ginny about to be killed, he launched himself to go for Bellatrix and get revenge rather then the maniac who wants to kill him ever since he was born.
It was actually Hermiones idea how Ginny can get Harry. If Hermione loved Harry, why would she tell Ginny how to get Harry? I think Harry and Hermiones connection is a sibling connection. Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe and loads of chemistry on set. If you have not read the books, then you would prefer Hermione and Harry. It's stupid really. Potter fans claims they read the books but they haven't actually read it? They just watched it on the movie. It's stupid really.
Look at Ginny Weasleys life in Deathly Hallows. Bill had the effects of a werewolf, she has no idea where Charlie is, Percy has been infatuated with the idea of the Ministry of Magic, hence leaving is family, George lost an ear, Fred dies, she has no idea where Ron or her best friend Hermione or even the love of her life. All she knows that there trying to kill Voldy, but she can't help even though she wants to. Her mum or dad won't even confide with her because she was "too young." She had started Dumbledores Army again along with her friends, even though Hogwarts is being run by Dumbledores murder (this is all she knows) and two of the most horrifying death eaters is being substitute headmaster. It was revealed that Neville had been bruised by the Carrows. What about Ginny? There was no way she could have lead Dumbledore Army without the risk of getting bruised. Also, one of the co-leaders of Dumbledores Army had "disappeared." No surprise if you had read the books it was Luna Lovegood. She has to deal with all of this without getting a meltdown and showing no fear. Now, you have to give credit for Ginny for this.
I won't deny that J.K Rowling said Harry and Hermione MIGHT have been a better match then Ron and Hermione. However, in this statement there is a loophole. She, cleverly, did not say Harry and Hermione MIGHT have been a better match then Ron and Hermione and Harry AND Ginny. She did not say that. Harry and Hermione shippers are right. Your a better match then Ron and Hermione according to J.K Rowling. BUT... (Yes there is a but) she didn't say Hermione and Harry is a better match then Harry and Ginny.
Just writing all of this is giving me a headache. At the end of the day, Harry Potter has ended by marrying Ginny Weasley. There very happy together just like Ron and Hermione. I like the ending, to be honest. It might seen a little cliche that Harry married the "fan girl" (which I made my point VERY clear that she's not) but doesn't Harry deserve a happy ending with the girl that he loved. Harry and Ginny love story is a bit like James and Lily's love story. James was an arrogant torag. He was obbsessed with Lily Evans, almost like a fan boy. He done different things attempt to woo her but time past and he grew more mature. At the last year of Hogwarts, it was Lily Evans who then fell in love with the real James Potter.
Of course it's just my opinion. Like if you learnt something new. You can also reply, I don't mind, but I do not want to have so many notifications.
"You go with it, despite the fact that no one has ever taken you to The Hufflepuff to stick your Slytherin in someone's Gryffindor."
Me = dead LOL
For sin 95 it's actually mad-eye not snape who says that
dopedivertidoyguapo424 well technically Barty Crouch Jr. but close enough
I usually like CinemaSins, but it does seem a bit like he's never watched any of the other films or really paid much attention to this one. I mean the room of requirement is pretty clearly explained... as is the stuff about not being able to solve all the problems just using magic... as is how slughorn carries stuff tons of stuff around... as is most of the stuff sinned in this video
Just like the books don't matter, the previous movies don't matter to Cinemasins.
That would prevent the nitpicking, which is precisely what this channel is all about and has always *been* about. The difference is that, unlike most of the movies they choose, the Harry Potter series is both popular and heavily reliant on its overarching narrative and pre-established information. You don't seen that same kind of connection in Twilight, Transformers, or Pirates of the Caribbean.
Ok, but realistically no one is going to watch this film without having read/seen any of the others. Anyway a lot of those are explained in this film, e.g. the room of requirement stuff
RikoZerame The previous movies do matter. That's like watching Star Trek: Into Darkness and saying its the best Star Trek movie without watching any of the others.
What did you expect he just wants to increase the meter though to be fair there is no movie without sins.
Electrolysis I'm not entirely sure why anyone upvoted you, unless they missed the very obvious "don't matter *to Cinemasins*" in my post.
I'm also not sure why when you consider that your analogy doesn't work: saying that you can't compare a film to others without seeing those others is *not* equivalent to judging a film based on its own merit and ignoring the others films to that end.
how to be immortal
step one, make someone your horcrux
step two, make them make someone their horcrux
step three, make that guy do the same thing
step four, repeat for as long as you want
step five, make thefinal person cast a horcrux on an average stone
step six, throw that stone into ocean
step seven, keep calm and live forever
But.. you'll probably look like a *nasty-a** snake thing!
+Jim Witte not really because it's not your soul that is being split, it's someone else's. Also, the reason Voldemort had his face become like that was because he had the barest fragment of his soul left and it was a physical manifestation of his lack of humanity. Or some shut like that
only two steps needed
step one, make someone your horcruxe
step two, make them make you their horcruxe.
you can't be killed until they're dead, but they can't die until you're killed
No bro ur mind will be fucked up. Of all those people u make a horcrux u will share their memories which is pain in the ass 24/7
@Zygo awesome :D
though, probably evil and stuff. But awesome.
Where is my "Hermione isn't old enough to be hot"?
Well she is old enough now
She was 18 when filming this as well so she is of legal age. Tbh I like her best from goblet of Fire and order of the Phoenix. I’m 14 so I’m not a pedophile
Ditto
She is hot now 😎
Thor Odinson she’s not gross she’s really pretty but I wouldn’t consider her hot
There actually is an anti-eavesdropping spell. Snape created it
Mufflito!
Snake made it?
Wonder why.
HurricaneWind "Muffliato"
Orkam Ceph oh lol
Snape is really good creating spells
I'm laughing at all the salty comments. This is CINEMA sins, not BOOK sins.
Yeah but some of the sins are explained in previous movies
+kimbalucy
As Susan said indirectly,
THE BOOKS DO NOT F****** MATTER
Sharia Munawara I didn't say shit about the books but hokay
True. I always try to correct him for saying things aren't explained when their on explained in the books and they got no time for that in the movies cause ain't nobody got time for that.
when they sinned themselves (yes they made a video sinning cinema sins) they admit that they read the books but they don't matter
Just to let you know the luck potion, if someone takes too many doses then the person will experience strange side effects
And its also 'highly toxic in large quantities' but the problem is it's not mentioned in the movies
what kind of side of effects? Also why is that something very helpful and Op must have a side effect to where people - oh fuck it!
+WrathKinSlayer if you really want to know read the books, otherwise you're just pointing out the fact that the movies don't do a good job explaining everything.
Cinemasins doesn't read the books, don't have to, and neither should movie audiences.
Agreed, but if you are gonna complain, there is information out there to explain what happens.
"You'd be welcome too Grainger"
*"and f*ck you, Ron!"*
man, that was so quick but I'm so glad I caught it, hahahah
damn, half-blood prince is my fav book. rewatching the movie (even in this situation, and even thru the amount of times ive already watched this so many times) breaks my heart someone help me
edit: DRAPPLE :)))
“But Draco was allowed into the Room of Requirement because he REALLY needed it? Like what?”
Me: um..... yeah that’s how the damn room works bruh
The movies never explained that. The sin stands. (Also, that joke flew right over your head, didn't it?)
I was confused by this aswell I would think the explanation of the room in the previous film would be enough for cinema sins to understand how it works... Draco only needs to feel a great need to enter the room of requirement and it will be equipped however is necessary for whatever he feels he needs it for.
Banana Man What was the joke?
The reason no one could get in to spy on draco is because he needed it to be unplottable and secure from other people. ITS. ALL. IN. THE. BOOKS.....
@@jamesluqqy3697 WE. ARE. SINNING. THE. MOVIE.
Professor McGonagle would be great at Cinema Sins.
Ron and Hermione have had chemistry throughout all the films. Look at Chamber of Secrets - Ron and Hermione don’t hug at the end, but shake hands. In Goblet of Fire Ron is jealous of Hermione and Viktor at the Yule Ball, and Hermione gets overly mad at Ron for not asking her. In Prisoner of Azkaban and Order of the Phoenix, Ron and Hermione have a kind of awkward chemistry throughout the entire film. They’ve been building them up since at least film two.
Plus in POA, Hermione holds Ron’s hand during the class with Buckbeak
Not to mention the hand holding in movie 2 and the hug that was way to passionate to be just friends before the griffin bird thing “died” in movie 3 lmao
Even Draco shipped them in 2 or 3
Here's a question, why is Draco wearing the same suit for the entire 6th year?
Or he has a wardrobe of replica suits, like danganronpa characters.
Because he looks damn good in it
Ugh i just wish the books mattered, because then the liquid luck thing would make sense. :(
(for those wondering, in the books they said that consuming too much of luck potion, or drinking it too regularly would kill you. But since they never mentioned that in the movies, in movie-universe that doesn't apply.)
Ainsley Felds Lol s0 randum XD
Except that they didn't - all Slughorn says is some vague bullshift about becomig reckless and overly relient on it. This in no way explains why they wouldn't use it on that once-a-year grand event they have every year.
Even if you consider that, liquid luck would still be mass produced and used. Just think in the last book of how many people there were involved in the battle for hogwarts. Unless all of them had already used liquid luck a whole bunch of times there is no reason why a few of them didn't drink any liquid luck. Also wouldnt Voldemort have drunk some? Surely Voldemort has the resources to acquire it, so its only logical for him to use it in a battle that important.
Really the whole felix felicis thing is completely bullshit.
In fact what's interesting is that throughout the whole series nobody ever uses potions to prepare for a fight/battle/dangerous situation. THAT is fucking insane. What the fuck are potions used for if you can't use them in a fight? Hasn't anyone heard of buff potions? Sure there's Draught of Living Death, so we know there are poisons, but nobody poisons anyone else either.
Frazier Clarke You can boil it down to magic in HP being boring and lame in general. Yeah, there's the awesome fight between V and DD in "Order", but other than that it's just "Call of Hogwarts: Modern Withcraft". No distorting reality, no fucking around with enemy's senses, no bringing things to life. It's all bullshit.
It takes 6 months to brew as well. No one knew the battle of Hogwarts would happen. Plus no one could get the ingredients because everyone was in-hiding anyway.
15:56 The thing is that there is an "anti-eavesdropping" spell they just never use it. It's called Muffliato and fills the ears of those who are in the area casted on with a loud unidentifiable buzzing.
but you dont find that out until deathly hallows (at least in the movies), and even then its not actually explained, we just know its useful for protection
It's in book 6, but not the movie
Snape made the spell because he was "The Half-Blood Prince," we found out later in the book that he was. That was probably why he was deflecting Harry's spells he was casting at Snape. That's probably why we were never greeted with anyone but Harry, Ron, Hermione and Snape ever using it, because Snape had made the spell and, if it wasn't for Snape, they heroes never would have made it through their sixth year. But luckily for them they got to skip their last year of school because they're cool. And why Snape never used, is never explained. NOT EVEN IN THE ORIGINAL BOOKS. So whenever we get an explanation for this, this was a useless comment i felt like posting because I don't have the self-esteem to make a worthwhile comment. Because we all know SNape made the spells and that he was The Half-Blood Prince... WAIT A MINUTE... Wasn't Snape a Slytherin? I thought Slytherin was Pure-Blood-Loving. Mudbloo- *cough cough* not wizard parents. *cough cough* hating. So... explain this to me, why was Snape-- oh nevermind. Voldemort's a half-blood, sooo... Snape and Voldemort sittin' in a tree. Talkin' about their horrible backstory... first comes story, then comes... Dark Magic adopted babies..? Then comes... uh... nevermind.. Forget this comment, it was not worthwhile, I am sorry for wasting your life. But aren't all the others Death Eaters pure-bloods? Why, in particular, was Snape allowed to be a Death Eater? When I get a reasonable explanation I SHALL FIND SOMETHING TO REPLY. This comment was to long for this.
+Movie Maker snape is a pure blood. His mothers maiden name was prince, therefore making him a half blood prince, half blood not referring to being part muggle
+Stephanie Westrick No his father is a Muggle, that's the Snape side, plus, his father was abusive, so he called himself the Half-Blood Prince (his mother's surname)
3:51
That’s not a sin, that’s Luna lovegood
Magic Mac same thing
*watches first version of these*
*GETS ADDICTED AND WATCHES ALL OF THEM*
I thought Harry Potter was stupid and childish. Initial I hard nothing to do one day and watched Sorcerer’s Stone (U.S. title) and watched them all. I’m a hypocrite.
A sin you forgot:
If Snape gives you a months detention for throwing up, why doesn't he give any disiplint to Harry for almost killing a student. But not only that a student from the house he supposed to keep track off!
Clara Harper Later the movie, we knew that Snape owned the book and made the spell. If he gives him detention, the professors will have knowledge about the book and spell, and it would've been bigger issue which will interfere with the whole plan of Dumbledore and Harry in getting the horcrux which Snape probably know as he's Dumbledore's double spy.
It's easy to get.
What studant did he almost kill
Aaron Moh Although curiously, Lupin mentions in the following book that Sectumsempra is a "signature spell" of Snape's, which would imply that at least he knew about it. Which in turn means James and Sirius both knew about it, which in turn means the Order may have known about it.
Actually the only spell James and Sirius knew of Snape's was Levicorpus. The only reason Lupin must have known about Sectumsempra may be because Snape must have used it a lot in front of him.
☮AmnaLuvsCookies☮ I find it reasonable to believe that James and Sirius would also have known about it since they were in the Order of the Phhoenix and thus also have possibly fought Snape.
"Evil Harry Potter" 😂😂😂😂😂
Cheyenne Stevenson He is right!
You mean roonwib wazzlib?
So, he's totally right, if literally ANYone else had been voldemort in the series, they would have won.
Nothing says recovering pride than letting your fyendfire snake swallow your enemy.
Works better on Harry Potter too
0:25 In the books, the bridge actually killed some Muggles. I guess they didn't want us to show that since this movie is not rated PG-13 like the last one.
5:05 Do these girls even know how babies are made? I don't recall there being a sex education class in Hogwarts. Is it in Muggle Studies? The wizarding world doesn't use the Internet (I don't think it's even been invented yet) so are there books for this sort of thing that they have to read over the summer?
8:06 Ron's reply, "Believe me, Professor. I've been asking myself the same question for the past six years." Ron would be great at Cinema Sins.
8:41 People need distractions. You can't have them be scared of Voldemort and his Death Eaters all the time. The U.S. has been in two wars in the past 13 years and you never once go to a sports game just to take your mind off of it?
9:39 Because it is told later that these Vanishing Cabinets are very tricky i.e. faulty. You have to test them in order for them to work properly. Like the Weasley's car or the polyjuice potion, the magic can sometimes lose its potency given time.
10:33 What is it with you and having people remain unenthusiastic or even depressed? Ron even says earlier in the movie, "I suppose people need a laugh these days."
+Grand Admiral Thrown Look on the back of the newspaper Harry is reading at the beginning. It says "Death toll rises" under the story about the bridge collapse.
+grand admiral thawn thank you for taking the time to write a comment that is spelled right and isnt five words long.
+BOB XX You know what the great thing is about comments? There is an option to edit them if you misspell something.
+grand admiral thrawn really? here it doesnt give me that option maybe it only does that on a computer im using my phone or maybe it does and i cant find it.
The books don't matter.
10:12 i think mad-eye moody told this in the goblet of fire
*said
It was. Remove one sin.
yeah
Actually it was barty crouch junior disguised as mad eye moody
Though Snape did something similar while in the closet with Karkrof.
There's multiple anti-eavesdropping spells. There's one that Snape invented and wrote in his potions book. Its called Muffalo but that means that only Snape and Harry know it.
*Muffliato
It's Muffliato.
Renji Abari But he does bring up a good point on why Snape didn't use one of them.
Muffliato ^^
Eclectic Crique As we've established at least two other times in this reply section
It says “bridge collapsed: Death toll rises” despite the fact that nobody on that bridge died.. ya missed that one
Yeah, I noticed that immediately.
I guess it is again time to remember you all, that the books do not matter in the slightest here. A movie is able to make sense on its own and thus should make sense on it's own. A human that needs crutches to stand is disabled, a movie that needs books as crutches is disabled as well.
you are going to remember us? that's sweet.
I agree, but I don't like your metaphor. A person who needs crutches isn't disables, they can still survive on their own fine. Depends why they're on crutches.
MsMaggyW
dis·a·bled
disˈāb(ə)ld/
adjective
(of a person) having a physical or mental condition that limits movements, senses, or activities
Yeah, a person with crutches is disabled by definition.
The movie makes sense on its own if you actually watch it.
Of course, if you skip the explainations and then complain things aren't explained then you're doing something wrong.
It seems like CinemaSins did just that for this movie, as half the sins are for "this isn't explained" and if you actually watch the movie 90% of those actually ARE either explained or self-evident.
MsMaggyW
A person with crutches may only by "temporarily disabled" until their leg heals from that nasty fall, but they are still technically "disabled" at that time.
"11.. That's when I get off."
"Damn, that's specific."
The scene with the burning house and the burning field never happened. And Arthur never told Harry anything about any cabinet.
Zorro del Demonio I literally watched the film it's there
+Reece Frampton he's talking about the books mate
Casper Diemar and CinemaSins is talking about the film
Missed sin: none of this would’ve happened had dumbledore not sent tom riddle to go to school