How the COLD WAR set Muslim Nations 100 years back
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 січ 2025
- ___________________________________
Join our Annual Program package (Subscription $10) and discover two of the most dynamic centuries within Muslim History, through regular (bi-weekly ) installments in our exclusive series:
(1) The Umayyad Kingdom | A Study of Islam's First Dynasty
(2) Shadow History | A Review of the Muslim World in the 20th Century
➤ Find out more about the Courses & Programs www.historyun....
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘𝐔𝐍
➤ Courses & Programs www.historyun....
➤ Documentaries on Patreon / historyun
➤ Book Club on Telegram t.me/AdabBookClub
➤ Instant Notifications on Whattapp tinyurl.com/His...
➤ Follow us on TwitterX / historyuntweets
➤ Follow us on TikTok tiktok.com/@Historyun
___________________________________
#Historyun #IlmFilm #ShadowHistory #IslamicHistory #History #MuslimHistory
Extracted from 5 hour Seminar as part of the Shadow History program.
➤ Find out more about the Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
Excellent work you're doing here. Everyone needs to know history to better understand the world,and especially the Muslims. History provides much context to make more sense of everything around us.
Hehe dear brother, people put thier feelings before facts or history ❤😂😂
You hit it on the head! The only solution that works against oppression of the muslim world is the last solution we’re willing to try. 🤦🏾♂️
I remember doing a history module about The Cold War but the only focus was on the US and USSR. This is a much needed video as the mainstream narrative is still focused on those two. And also there’s never mention about the Muslim world in relation to the Cold War.
Jazakumullahu Khayran
It's really questionable, they totally overlook the involvement and impact of the Muslim world, which in the end settles the final score when the Soviets are vanquished and collapse after the war in Afghanistan.
These snippets are the highlight of my day. I think I'm gonna have to get the paid subscription.
First time I am early for one of these uploads! :) May Allah Bless you Ustadh for educating us on our forgotten history!
Barakallahu Feekum 💎💯
Looking forward to part 2, thank you so much for the work you do these are extremely helpful. As you said in the past, more Muslims need to gain a greater understanding of history in order to diagnose contemporary problems and predict future events.
I agree. For all their mistakes, the Ottomans were better than this checkerboard of nation-states. They are such a symbolic period in the history of Islam. I would gladly give my bay’ah to Sultan Abdul-Hameed us-Sani if I was living in 1904 / 1320 Hijri. May Allah help us, Ummah of Rasulallah (Salallahu Alaihai Wassalam), unite us, even beyond the impressive realms of the Sublime Porte that presided over the last khilafat in Constantinople. Ameen. Whether we are in Sarajevo, Senegal, Sumaal, Syria, Samarqand, Sindh, Sylhet, or Sumatra, may we all come together, united by our belief in Allah (Subhana wa ta’ala), Inshallah.
Insha'Allah. Ameen.
I still remember a clip when trump said he asked the king for money to protect him and the king had to pay billions
Loving this channel
I’m subscribing
The famous statement on reforming the Ummah is attributed to Imam Malik.
“لا يصلح آخر هذه الأمة إلا ما أصلح أولها”
“Nothing will reform the latter of this nation except what reformed the beginning of it”
More precisely Imam Malik took this statement from one of his teacher’s the tabi wahb ibn Kaysan.
Malik ibn Anas reported: Wahb ibn Kaysan, may Allah have mercy on him, would sit with us and he would not stand to leave until he said to us, “Nothing will reform the latter of this nation except what reformed the beginning of it.”
Source: Musnad al-Muwaṭṭaʼ lil-Jawharī 1/584
عَنْ مَالِكٍ بن أنس قَالَ كَانَ وَهْبُ بْنُ كَيْسَانَ رحمه الله يَقْعُدُ إِلَيْنَا ثُمَّ لا يَقُومُ أَبَدًا حَتَّى يَقُولَ لَنَا إِنَّهُ لا يُصْلِحُ آخِرَ هَذِهِ الأُمَّةِ إِلا مَا أَصْلَحَ أَوَّلَهَا
1/584 مسند الموطأ للجوهري
Barakallahu Feekum. The precise source had escaped my mind however it encapsulates the thought perfectly
JazakallAhu Khayran for the reference
excellent content guys
2:07 you forgot Yemen was part of Britain
Not entirely, Yemen was divided into Northern and Southern. The Ottomans controlled half and the British the other.
@@Historyunwhat side controlled Ansarullah territory back then?
@@AfG_313 North
I agree that paying for protection to a single entity (i.e. the ottomans) was more advantageous than what came after with other super powers simultaneously feasting. But by the 19th century the ottomans were a shell of their former selves so would there have been any real advantage of continuing to pay homage to them?
It's about representation and posture. We had greater negotiating power under one entity even when it was weak. Even if the Ottomans were half dead, they were still standing. Take the example of prophet Soleiman who was stood up for days despite having died already, the Jinn were still afraid and cautious in his presence...
The Ottomans still had the ability to declare Jihad and trigger half of the Ummah. Which Muslim nation can do that today with legitimacy?
At the very least, they defended the holy sites and had armies in Jerusalem. Where are the armies today?
There is a reason why the British requested the Khilafah as a concept to be abolished even after victory. Why? Because without it Muslims are useless.
With Chinese communists rising British wanted a united India and army and we're disregarding earlier 1941 promises with Muslims in Alexandria , where Churchill Jinnah and sikander met ..Then 1946 onwards mass movement started and British agreed to partition of India
pajeets vs woof woof
Great lesson
What are the names of those books your holding up at 34:34 ?
Another gem of History. 👍🏿😎
7:37 how miserable we are may Allah unify us & 9:00 the best manner to say the truth MashAllah akhy
Unfortunately we were just a pawn in a bigger game that thought it was the queen
jazkallah bro HISTORYUN/ In that diagram of the flags epresenting the US and Russia do you think these two nations represent yajuj/majuj and the nations under those flags represent the tribes that belong to these two?
The UN and Warsaw Pact standards simply represented the nations under their network of allies
Shiekh Ibn Baaz or Uthaymeen I believe said to stay neutral a while back ago. Wish the leaders had listened.
Bn Baaz actually passed the fatwa to invite the US.. and shk uthayman never disagrees with shk bn Baaz
British even aided and funded certain ethnic group in Afghanistan during this era, and through America still does
Asalamu alaikum ahki Allahumma Barik ALLAH Hafiz Ameen
That jacket is plush too 👌🏾
Wa Aleikum Salam brother. Barakallahu Feekum 💎
This makes so so so much sense! I always wonder why Cuba was hated so much by the US, why Somalia joined Soviet Union. Why Afghanistan received so much destruction and why BRICS was getting so much attention. Wallahi you filled in the gaps and all the side beefs. It’s all proxy wars by the world’s biggest bullies.
Conclusion: Gog and Magog ???
@8:07
❤❤❤
Didn’t some Saudis scholar have fatwa for west to invade Muslim lands .
didn’t some iranian scholar say death to sunni?
@@itzhassanplayz909this is ur reply emotionally soft kiddo
tito was the boss of all bosses. there was no problem worshipping islam under titos rule. dont let be fooled by anyone on this topic. i have asked many contemporary witnesses.
Tito?
Pakistan was created very differently from.israel . What the hell is the commentator talking about . Does not know even the basics of Hindu muslim.friction.which was main factor in creation..
1. Did Britain allow them?
2. Did Britain make sure there was animosity between neighbours before they went?
3. Was the leader educated in Britain?
It is almost exactly the same. The minutiae are not important.
Same year, Same authority and Same process. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck .....
@@Historyunyup but I’m curious to ask would you argue that Pakistan shouldn’t have been created? Pakistan always has been a western Allie and in many aspects a puppet but I think it’s fair to say that Pakistans creation was important to save Indias Muslims from Hindutva
@umaryusuf537 That question has been addressed in this video
ua-cam.com/video/uBEE1aQvQvk/v-deo.html
Don’t be emotional. Everything is temporary
Arab revolt
Mossadegh was the best Iranian leader in my opinion. Best iraqi leader was Abdul Salam Arif. Both good leaders who were non-aligned leaders during the cold War period. Also, Khomeini was very anti US and anti Soviet. But It's sad that Iran is now very pro Russian.
Mosadegh was too honest for the job, unfortunately. Khomenei received arms indirectly via America and Israel (Iran-Contra affair) but was outwardly hostile to both camps (although in reality they shunned him anyway, so did he have any other choice). Interesting episode in modern history
@Historyun Brother iran & israel love/ friendship runs deeper than only iran contra affair, all of iran proxies suffer severe attacks from zionazis, that itself tells us partial story, it is worthwhile if you can read the book treacherous alliance by trita parsi, it tells you more about iran israel friendship because of geopolitics & regional balance of power
@@googleuser-fo7tdthis what you call strength and power, we will lead the new world. Remember this comment. Without us nothing would be possible today.
Iran not pro Rus nobody is its only politics we will go against them as well but that’s in very far future