ENGINE FAILS AFTER TAKEOFF | Emergency Return by Southwest B737
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 бер 2024
- 22/MAR/2024
Southwest B737 performing flight from Fort Lauderdale to Houston was on the initial climb when the pilots declared an emergency, reporting the right engine had failed and would need to return to the field immediately.
__________________
Your support is really important and appreciated to keep these videos coming! =)
-- / vasaviation
-- paypal.me/VASAviation
Become a VIP member of VASAviation! -- / @vasaviation
Flying Eyes 10% OFF: flyingeyesoptics.com/?ref=Vas...
Join VASAviation's Discord -- / discord
Twitter/Facebook/Instagram -- @VASAviation
Audio source: www.liveatc.net/
Please, give a big LIKE to support and for more videos like this!! :)
For once the controller didn't ask "say again?" when they declared an emergency. 😂
Well, she kinda did at 00:33. SW1575 says they got an engine failure, and she says: "Say again?"
@@der.Schtefancus she stepped on him
@jdl2327 yup and she even acknowledged she stepped on them... after thier response you could tell she had no question on what was going on! Hats off.
@@der.Schtefan : more precisely, she knows someone said something alarming but doesn't know who said it. We know it, because Victor wrote it down, but she only heard the end of what they said.
The Miami Tower controller is my older sister!
Gotta love how FLL handles emergencies quick and professional
They're used to it from all the banner towing operations, which I retired from doing in 2016. We're always having some type of issue. 🤣
@@paulis7319 true
That must have been a dangerous job. @@paulis7319
Nothing like professional. In the slightest. American controllers are incapable of it. Not to say they were bad, but if you want to see professionals then look at how the western Europeans handle it.
I can already see the headlines and news reports about a 737 suffering "catastrophic engine failure".
Are you saying that didn’t happen? Because it did. 🤷🏻♂️
I mean... Didn't they
I’m actually serious. I went plane spotting yesterday and I saw this plane takeoff! Holy moly
A long time ago, I drove charter motor coach (Yes, just like the Greyhound on a route, but we only did charters.) All of our buses were manufactured by MCI (Motor Coach Industries). All of our engines were Detroit engines (manufactured by General Motors). All of our transmissions were manufactured by Allison (a division of GM). When we had an engine or transmission failure, MCI was never to blame. It was either GM or our maintenance crew. An engine failure is not Boeing’s fault. Stop the blame game.
A series 60 with a B500 in a D4505 (or DL3-102) was the peak of reliability.
Then again, the buses didn't go right when the wheel was turned left and the roof didn't blow off pulling out of the bus station.
@@kcgunesq You might be surprised.
Pilots doing what they're trained to do in an emergency situation! Great Job Everyone!
Beautifully handled
At first I read that as the engine fell off and I was like "man, first a door and now the whole engine".....Boeing is just falling to pieces.
I see what you did there...
Super nice controller at MIA R. Well done all around.
Excellent ATC work. Crisp, clean, accomodating, proactive on that weather.
Lady controller did a fantastic job
These engine failures clearly aren't a Boeing issue, although shoddy maintenance could be a factor. Those engines are CFM56's, they're made by CFM International, a Franco-American company in Cincinnati. Those engines first debuted in 1982 after almost a decade of testing. They're not exactly spring chickens. Start looking beyond Boeing for these problems that are popping up.
I still blame Boeing they set the industry standard for laziness
@@limbeboy7Who’s setting the standard for lazy blaming?
Maybe maintenance issues? I recall some company getting fake approved aircraft parts from China that shouldn't been purchased a year ago.
Thanks for pointing this out. I rage against the TV when the talking heads blame Boeing for every little thing, even on airplanes that are 10+ years old.
Pros at work.
impressive tight left turn on final for an aircraft with the right engine inoperative!
People will say "Boeing again"😭
Passengers are already paranoid about Boeing. Any emergency, normal or otherwise, will freak them out. Not without reason, unfortunately. Professional job by pilots & ATC.
IOU242 Engines are made by CFM !!!!! Could have hit a bird, maintanence problem, get the facts before runnin your mouth !!! !
@@wilburfinnigan2142 Please read my comment twice before opening YOUR mouth
And understandably so. 'people' don't care about who makes the engine or who does maintenance.
@@doobybrother21 Your comment makes no sense. Why would you blame a manufacturer for something built by some other manufacturer? And if it's so logical to blame Boeing for engine failures, how come is not logical to blame Airbus, Embraer or any other aircraft manufacturer for the same engine failures?
Make it make sense.
I only have irl experience in small singles but it always seems odd to send someone lower and further away from the airport after losing an engine.
They usually have to run checklists. Since the plane is sometimes overweight. The fuel that is normally burnt off is heavy and then they usually have to calculate if they can safely land. Some airports are busy too, so they usually line them back on usually away from traffic or in route with other traffic. Rushing often can and usually does lead to mistakes.
The pilot stated they needed to run checklists. There are procedures for trying to restart an engine in flight and possible diagnostics. Perfectly fine for them, since they have a second engine to run on. For single engine planes, this isn't always an option.
Well, this isn’t a single engine aircraft. So it doesn’t matter.
boeing in march: whistleblower killed in mysterious circumstances, multiple emergencies involving their aircraft, undercover film showing boeing employees would not fly boeing.. and they have an army of people on social media trying to do damage control
What does an Engine failure have to do with Boeing?
boeing chooses who provides their engines, do they not? so many boeing defenders here not willing to see how much they are messing things up @@James-xs9mn
@@James-xs9mnprobably nothing, but you actually don’t know this. You are so quick to jump onto Boeing’s defense without knowing what happened. It could be all kinds of reasons and some of those could be Boeing’s fault too. I mean, the Max, the pilots can’t forget to turn off engine anti ice or it will damage the engine. You think that’s the engine manufacturer’s fault?
All these news reports yet has anyone died? No. Nobody has died in a US airliner crash on over 15 YEARS. It goes to show that even when things go wrong, there’s so much redundancy.
Seems bizarre that they have to explain the emergency three times. There’s no info sharing between the controllers?
I assume it's to prevent wrong info being passed on, or info getting out of date if there is a change in the situation.
At least this time is not United
184 souls on a SWA B738? Is there room after 175 pax, 2 pilots, 4 FAs? even with jumpseats?
Maybe one of the passengers strapped to the wing caused the engine failure? LOL
There are two extra jumps in the back and two in the cabin. Possible for 185 souls total
@@dav6239 Aha, thank you for the info!
lap children also count
It's amazing that an aircraft would suffer an engine failure and request a return to the field. Back in the day an engine failure would result in a crash.
No it didn’t. Not with 2 engines.
Is the transcript autogenerated in Arabic for everyone? I have no problem with it just trying to determine if it is something I did on my end.
No, UA-cam's transcribing system is... well... problematic. Most of the time I get English. However, there are times it defaults me to Spanish, French, Portuguese, etc. when it's feeling especially spicy. But you can change it back. Google and its associated services are a PIA.
And you are probably on a watchlist now
@@jackielinde7568 Have you checked for this video? Just like you, I was used to change it when needed, but now there seems no be no other choice but arabic. Just curious if you'd get the same.
@@BlueSkyUp_EU I normally leave CC on. I got English this time around. Doesn't invalidate my comment at all.
@@jackielinde7568 It wasn't meant to invalidate your comment. I was curious to see what you get for this specific video. I get EN for any other video except for this one where only arabic is available, so I was curious to see if others get different options.
That’s about as boring as it should be.
but all engines are outside the plane? right?
Until they're not
Well the APU is technically an engine and it's inside
Am I crazy or does this pilot sound like he could be from Australia or New Zealand?
There’s a lot of Aussie pilots in the US, there’s a treaty between them that makes it very easy for Australian pilots to come to the states
Hard to hear exactly. I thought it was a South African accent.
... and I recently saw an article suggesting that lots of US airlines were poaching Australian pilots right out of training programs. On the other hand, as an Australian, I don't think the pilot is: I think it's actually a broad rural north American accent (though I don't know the accents well enough to nail it down) - but I agree there's a flavour similar to the Broad Australian accent.
Its Kiwi :)
For the dumbo’s … THIS IS NOT A BOEING PROBLEM
For the dumbo 👆👆, you don’t know one way or another, because we simply don’t have the info. Heck, the MAX, if the pilot forgets to turn off the anti ice, he or she might damage the engine. Is that an engine manufacturer problem?
It probably has nothing to do with Boeing, but it’s not something you or I know for sure at this point.
Can’t wait for the bullshit comments from guys with no flying experience say “WhY DiDnT hE SAy MaYDaY?”
I have 31 years of professional flying and the last few years the FAA has pushed for us to say Mayday or Pan pan. So your comment is wrong. Current pilots with flight experience can tell you that indeed the proper way is to say Mayday.
Why is it so hard to declare Mayday or Pan Pan? It's the paperwork? The ATC basically had to guess that they were in an emergency.
Shit happens man. There will be an after action report and they will cover stuff. I was a crew chief on Blackhawks for over twenty years. Shit can get crazy quick. More important than declaring is flying the aircraft. It is easy to become task saturated. And engine falling off is about as bad as it gets.
These professional pilots executed a safe and expedient landing. Yet, without fail, some neckbeard that’s never flown a transport category aircraft will complain in the comments about something as pedantic as declaring mayday. It would have made zero difference here and it’s so far down on the list of priorities.
How do you know they didn’t? About the first minute you couldn’t even hear the full transmissions from the aircraft.
“ATC had to guess they were in an emergency.”
“We have an engine out and need to return to the field.”
“Are you having an emergency? I can’t tell.”
Mayday or Pan Pan is too get everyone to STFU. In this case they were already under ATC control. It's also an one engine out , so they still have time to call company and run their checklist. Had they lost both engines, that mayday call would have gone out.
ATC knows its an emergency. Pilots haven't bothered to share that. Oh, they changed the transponder, but they never read the FAA guidance on emergency communications, obviously. Nice overlay,. The production standard on these videos is excellent.
FYI changing the transponder is not required in communication with atc.
I'm not a pilot, and I'm not suggesting your comment is unreasonable, but it made me think of one of these videos from a few months ago. A pilot in a small aircraft who might've been solo or with one passenger had some mechanical issue that necessitated him either returning to the airport, or making an emergency landing somewhere. Somebody in the comments section asked indignantly why the pilot didn't declare mayday sooner ... as if that would've made his mechanical problems any less problematic. I don't know if he or she expected ATC to fix his problems remotely or maybe to send somebody up there to pick him up or give him a tow, or what exactly this person had in mind.
@@PrenticeBoy1688in a small aircraft, vfr with no traffic around declaring mayday asap probably doesn't matter as much when you're in contact with atc about it. Still tho the ATC can notify emergency services to prepare when emergency is declared. But in big jets, declaring emergency immediately is a necessity because there's a lot of traffic around you and much more emergency equipment needs to be prepared.
Aviate, Navigate, then Communicate. Once you start talking to ATC it becomes question after question, while trying to manage a situation. In the US, it is common to say "we are declaring an emergency". Controlling the plane, PF vs PM, time vs no time, memory items, quick reference handbook, checklist items, runway landing performance for single engine and on top of all that ATC asking question after question. It's easy to say they didn't use the right terminology but at that moment, that's the last thing on the mind.
@@el_quba Oh, I do wish UA-cam would stop automatically deleting my comments. It's so bloody tedious.
General nobody asking a question: my read of watching these videos is that losing one engine to a compressor stall or losing one engine overall is a pretty routine event with checklists. Honestly I’m starting to yawn when I get these alerts because they are so often and so routine. In fact I barely watch them anymore.
But I wondered the other day: why do I treat these as routine? Is it just me? (Maybe it is)
Is the law of randomness gonna catch up with these engines stalls and failures on 2 engine planes …when…both engines have events simultaneously?
And if so, should the industry try getting those engine failures/stall down to zero?
I’m open to all pushback and arguments that I’m overreacting. I want to learn. Thanks.
They really are routine. It happens daily somewhere around the world. Pilots have to practice handling engine failures every time they go in the simulator for recurrent training, which is at least annually. Most pilots will never experience it in a 30 year career, but they are ready.
Really any type of in can incident on the channel is routine and a non issue as far as people being safe and flight crews knowing how to handle it. The incidents that are the most work and can be the most challenging involve hydraulic systems, but those usually happen with plenty of fuel and they can take their time to handle the challenge.
@@hewhohasnoidentity4377 thank you for taking the time to answer my question. I have one follow-up question: every one of these situations is with one engine affected on a 2 engine plane. Can a 2 engine plane still return to an airport with stalls in both engines?
See “Miracle on the Hudson.” But really, I would like to see a new and improved B-727 hit the market again.
@@shackelton1 the vast majority of compressor stalls and other causes to shut down an engine are primarily to prevent damaging the engine. Very rarely does an engine fail in a way that the engine shuts itself down and can't be restarted.
This means that if they shut down one engine and are working the checklists to isolate that engine and prepare to land and the other engine gives a cause for concern, they can always start the first engine back up. This is what is called a very bad day and there is a risk of the flight crew screwing it up, but they would recognize that and be very cautious.
Just like in a car, many times engine problems are just a bad sensor. Aircraft engines cost millions, so the first indication of a problem the airline wants the engine shut down so it can be looked at.
It is statistically nearly impossible for both engines to have a severe enough problem to not be able to be used to reach an airport. The only exception is contaminated or lack of fuel. There have been less than a handful of these events in the history of commercial aviation, each in very circumstances that are not possible today.
@@m.choudry4898 blame American Airlines. Boeing wanted the 737 to be an update to the 727 with newer engines and higher passenger capacity. American insisted on 2 engines. I would add blame American for the MAX for announcing the order for an aircraft Boeing didn't intend to make, but Boeing messed that up all by themselves.
Let's hear about it.
SWA 1575, my dog would like to know the status of your emergency.
Boeing fanboys getting triggered 🤣🤣 This is not Boeing related but you have to admit that that company has some serious issues at the moment.
"If it's a Boeing..." 😎
"I am dying 😎"
I aint going
What happened to mayday mayday mayday. Is that used anymore.
Rarely in the United States.That is more of a European thing.
We don't shout "help me help me help me" in french over the radio here. We simply get on the radio and tell ATC wtf we are gonna do.
@@lharris428that’s BS.
@@m.choudry4898no it’s not. The FAA has been pushing for us to say proper mayday for a few years now. In recurrents, “declaring an emergency” is no longer acceptable.
Oh, southwest 737 engine failure, again lol
Cool as a cucumber. Can't wait for quata hire pilots.
A “quata hire”?
Ridiculous statement.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 I don't know if you're so simple minded to no recognize satire or what. So I'll explain like you're a 5 year old. The pilot lost an engine. He was unflappable, didn't blame engine failure on his skin color, what bathroom he used, or because he was a member of the alphabet mafia. He dealt professionally, handled the problem with no excuses.
@@nicholascosentino8492 right. Indicating that a quota hired pilot would not have been unflappable.
Get on a Boeing plane at your own risk.
And scarebus also just had an engine failure on take off !!!!! Pratt Whitney !!!!!....DUUUUHHHH !!!!!!
When did Boeing start making engines again?
@@josh3771 never
Most commercial aircraft in the world are Boeing of course.
@@roderickcampbell2105Nope. Since 2003 Airbus is the largest manufacturer of commercial aircraft.
B O E I N G.