Correction: AIM-54 is 17g, not 16. I'm not rerendering the video for that so every time I say 16g imagine it's 17. A few of the people that proofwatched the video told me that the reduced smoke motor for the phoenix would also have reduced thrust. I still think gaijin could still add it as an option. The reason I havent uploaded in 3 months is because I've been working full time, and because my videos take so long to make there just aren't enough hours in the day to keep up with both things as much as I'd like to (and I make about 50 cents per hour or less on youtube for reference). I had been trying to make the ARH video for months, but between gaijin changing them and gaijin breaking my tools I've had a very hard time making that video, and I want it to be good. It's still one of my top priorities. So with that in mind we're very solidly on the "videos happen when they happen" schedule. I really want to finish Jets 101 sometime this fall but I have no clue if that's a realistic goal. Sorry for rambling and sorry for not being able to deliver what I want to deliver
i decided to try sim and ill be honest I'm hooked, sure its not dcs but its way better than the 16v16 clusterfuck thats ARB and I completely agree we need AIR RB EC. i have noticed that it is way wayyy easier to dodge missiles in simulator battles especially fakours I wonder if you could you know test it out, if not I would love a video about the playstyles of the mig 29s, as I'm still having trouble with the irst hms mode. Great content btw.
No Problem. Normal Life is more important. Take ur time with those Videos, the Quality is what sets u apart from others and i love it. Keep making these bangers
Glad you're managing to do both, life is the priority. Your videos are honestly some of the best for information while also being entertaining, hope you figure out a way to monetize them
@@goldfishPACIFIERwell top tier sim is also all over the place, it’s the same missile spam but there you get launched on as soon as you take off from the airfield.
bro talk to us man we love you dawg don't ever forget that keep up the grind I'm too working 2 jobs and its hard out here but you Gotte keep the pills quiet, or they will make you quiet
@@mikeyplayzwrldit’s entirely Irans claims for performance on the missiles. The Sedjil and Fakour have the same motor as the MIM-23B I-Hawk missile which mind you is not a mach 5 missile and even Mach 4 is pushing it. The G tolerance of 20 is also questionable unless that is the claimed dual axis G pull. Fakour-90 also uses the AIM-54B seeker and electronics so there’s that.
@@mikeyplayzwrld 1. You're* saying that like *you* know how it is in real life. What do you know about it? The sedjeel has been successfuly used IRL against contemporary aircrafts like the Super Etendard ans has been in service since the late 80s. 2. It's a game, if you put a weapon system to be used, it has to be useful. What would be the point of giving a unique missiles that has to be ressearched AFTER the R-27R just to be completely useless. 3. Do you think they just decided to give better fins for no reason just cuz they wanted to? Players bug reported it, they used documents and specs about the HAWK missiles that the sedjeel is based from.
@@TheSpartan227and yet we can’t seemingly bug report other obvious things because gaijin decided it isn’t in need of change, or that the docs are innacurate
@sooryan_1018 It's definitely in service. You see it sometimes in videos of Su-27's and Tu-95's being intercepted over international waters between Alaska and Russia. If you see a Flanker or even a Fullback with an R-27, 98% of the time it's gonna be an EA. The 27ER has pretty much been retired simply because it's old and obsolete. I wouldn't be surprised if Russia sold their old R-27's to country's like North Korea, Iran, and Pakistan to fund their war.
@@thesolstice_8122 Russia definitely WON'T be giving to Pakistan, because of India They had previously given Gsh-23 gun and the MiG-29 engine to Pakistan (for JF-17) but giving a missile itself would alert their close ally. So prob not But yea they'd definitely try to sell to others like Iran and DPRK
"Discussions about missiles especially regarding their implementation relative to real life performance usually devolve into an Autism contest" has got to be the most accurate way to describe War thunder Forum debates i've ever heard.
At this point just give it the R-73 over the 9P and bump it's BR up the rumour of testing is only slightly more dubious than it having test fired the R-27
Another problem with the aim-54A and C not listed in the video is their absolutely pathetic lofting profile especially in comparison with the revised lofting profiles of the fox-3’s that were added after the Phoenix but fixed before the Phoenix.
I mean, if Gaijin wanted to give the Phoenix a side-grade option, they could have two separate models of the C. One with the Mk.47 Rocketdyne motor, and the other with the Mk.60 Aerojet motor. The Mk.60 would have less burn time but more thrust. But range was always supposed to be the Phoenix's main selling point. Not agility. The main issue I have with Phoenix's performance is that the loft profile is kinda fucked. Phoenix should not be practically dead on energy with a mere 80km (~50 mi) shot when launched from high altitude considering the missile has a max IRL range of ~200km (~120 mi). The loft profile is mainly to blame for this lack of end-game energy and range. Fix that and the missile is great even without multi-plane maneuvering modeled.
the aim 54 should just be buffed to a 22 or 20g missile and maybe get its drag adjusted but that may fuck up it’s close range performance even more so idk
@@Registered_Simp Imo it should have the stronger, but shorter burn time engine, as it doesn't really affect the maximum distance that much Edit: it will also be able to reach mach 5 as it's supposed to (the A is the one that goes mach 4.3)
Definitely agree that the Phoenix should be given a little more love in terms of its maneuverability. After watching some videos online featuring what it can do during test firings and training shots, it definitely should be able more maneuverable compared to what it is now
That is because Gaijin 1. Artificially nerfed them and continues to for “balance”. 2. Gaijin doesn’t take into account some missiles are designed to use dual axis movement to achieve more pull than it normally would when limited to single axis.
Yeah the problem with the Phoenix is Gaijin is basing its max G load off what it could pull with one set of fins. IRL the Phoenix would roll to 45 degrees from the direction it wanted to turn and use both sets of fins to turn
Also the reduced smoke motor would be a big help, the fantasy version they have in game is pretty stupid and seems to be a game of balancing radar missiles to the level of eastern missiles and making them all have smoke for better gameplay. The AMRAAMs being the silliest example I think.
@@ICECAPPEDSKY Gaijin had to nerf the phoenixes for "balance" reasons yet they'll refuse to move the F-14 from 12.3, and would randomly ass pull a nonexistent aphe round that can one shot tanks into two soviet premium strike aircrafts in one patch. I fucking hate this company.
@@r1zmy the F14’s can’t go higher than 12.7 generally or they will get brutalized (except Iran F14) if the Phoenix got buffed they’d be forced to move them which they don’t want to up in br. iran F14 is likely going to inevitably go up to 12.7 to maybe even 13.3 or something after Veteran players abuse it to grind out air events.
@@r1zmythey have like 3km better range than the Aim-120, but on the other hand, their one-chaffed while notching or going cold, they have bad manuverability, they hold less energy at longer ranges, they’re heavier, they can be shot down and detected in radar because of their sheer size, their acceleration of the rail is worse and their close range performance is non-existent. No.
Another potential "fix" to the AIM-54C would be gaijin unfucking its guidance code. Atm, the 54C has the exact same guidance code as the 54A, while IRL the 54C has a completely new and vastly more advanced guidance section that was specifically made to allow it to follow more complex and optimized trajectories (better loft and energy management in-game), mostly to improve its pK% vs small and maneuvrable targets. This wouldnt make it get to a target faster, but it would allow it to have more energy WHEN it gets to the target, making it significantly more dangerous. The kick in the dick about the Fakour-90 is that not only does it have a much better rocket motor, and better maneuverability, it ALSO got much better guidance code compared to the AIM-54C, cuz fuck TT F-14 players I guess...
They definitely need to implement BTT as that will also benefit rolling airframe missiles like the whole issue with manpads rn. Additionally, the CnP AAM3s will finally get their accurate 40g capability and magic 2s will have their maneuverability accurate as well
finally i thought you were never going to upload any video Jaek also can you do a general review on top tier ARH missiles from the AIM-120 all the way to the Derby ?
I still want to do that but I've been having problems with the testing setup being buggy, if I can get that ironed out it will be a priority 100%. Dont want to spread misinformation.
Frankly I thought the tradeoff for the Fakour was the fact it couldn't pull as much. But now it's just straight up better in every way. I gave it a go yesterday with the Sedjeel's and definitely found a lot more success with both as long as I took reasonable shots. I took about a 26km shot with the Sedjeel on a guy I saw contrailing and they went evasive and even got into a notch but my radar never broke lock and the missile hit. It was definitely having to maneuver a lot.
i think it would be best to give it its R73s, remove the R27R1 since irl it never worked with the tomcat´s radar, buff the Sedjill (not really, just detail more its seeker, cus irl it could never have been an 7F/M copy or similar, since iran never received its AIM7F and its AIM9Ls because of political reasons, just give it DL (if it had irl) and its okay, i think they added a HMD later, but i suppose it would have been just for the R73s since i find difficult for iran to make russian equipamment work with american Radar set. yes it would be a late variant of the Persian Cat, but still, the Fakour 90 is a missile that only the F14s iran is using today are equipped with, the F14 Early that is shown ingame should have AIM54As only, since the Fakour 90 is only equipped on later variants that iranian sources say that are completely different planes from what they once was. (without any proof off course) but still, if all this were to be added, it would be 13.0 material, even with only 60 CMs edit: fuck it, you could put it on 13.3 and the Fakour spam would still kill a lot of guys.
@@jaek_898 I've never had issues like this before, it never used to get confused by chaff while in a head on engagement, now it does. just happened to me twice in a row. meanwhile, my chaff does nothing even from rear aspect, I've got to WT notch everything, which isn't how you really notch. in WT, you gotta present the largest profile possible, angle your top towards the radar locking you. it'll break lock beyond 5 km within seconds. which is wild, it shouldn't be like that, it should really be the opposite, but that's how it works in this game.
Was waiting for your video... good stuff. I Saw Gajin making it 12.7 at first just due to having the R27Rs for head-on(harder to dodge than AIM 7s), now with all these other buffs 12.7 is a guarantee. It was an easily grindable/purchasable vehicle so I feel like newb players poor stats will keep it 12.7 instead of a firm 13.0
Maybe this will get them to fix existing weapons and systems and bring the game as a whole up to modern speed and not auto gimping or nerfing things on release because their game can’t handle it.
I am gonna be honest: I have a massive skill issue with the F-14 Iriaf. Barely get kills with it, even with the fakours, I guess I am just launching at the wrong targets. However, even with my massive skill issue, I can say that the only thing holding this plane back from being 100% broken instead of just 90%, is the RWR and relatively low countermeasures. This thing is otherwise just criminal, especially now that the Sedjeel is no longer a gimmick and actually is scary.
Fly level until you reach at least mach .8 then enter a ~30 degree climb up to about 4-5k meters. Switch to TWS HDN, 93km range, with the narrower search pattern. Find a group of 3 or 4 people flying at more or less the same altitude and launch at 40-45km on all targets, making sure to keep at least one of them tracked with TWS while diving down and cranking. Once you see that the target indicator on the radar scope switches to a solid line, instead of a line and a circle, then that means the missile(s) have gone active and are guiding with their own radar. At that point you can stop tracking the targets with TWS and enter a notch to defend against enemy missiles. The narrower TWS search pattern gives you more frequent updates and lets the missile guide more precisely and launching at 40-45km gives the missiles a good amount of energy to hit maneuvering targets. By firing at enemies that are at more or less the same altitude as each other, you can keep all of them locked with TWS at the same time and effectively guide all your missiles until they go active. Its very important that you provide the missiles with tracking from your TWS otherwise they'll just fly off in a general direction and may not actually lock anything at all.
@@moldypotato4656 Except for me firing from roughly 60 km, this is already exactly what I am doing. I will check in a few minutes if the additional 20 km really make that much of a difference
I mean I just don't want to play the IRIAF because GE'ing parts to get basic access to my missiles is dog and fighting infinite fakuours on the enemy team is annoying lol (11.3-12.3 is all US vs US)
Aim-54A Block 50, Block 52, and Aim-54C Block 60. The 52 has a smokeless motor. More range and the same everything else. Aim54C has a better seeker. less range smokeless. Yourwelcome for the dumb down explanation I fly dcs tomcats lol
Hey man, I know you don't own the rights to it, but I've been planning on using music from Ace combat, specifically five which I see you've done, in my own videos. I want to see if you're cool with that just so I'm not stepping on toes. I'm a super small channel but I'd still hate to ruffle any feathers if this is kind of your thing
@@jaek_898 I gotcha, still think it's polite to ask since seeing your video reminded me of it. Is combat four was actually the first game I ever played. Very fond memories
Gaijin is selling the Iranian F-14 thru the market place.Just another way to sell a "premium" without people screaming at you!!That is why they buffed it....
They don't sell the tomcat, other players do but sales do benefit them because selling a tomcat will give you gjn coin which you can only spend on wt, while person buying it likely used real money so the money still remains in game
@@captchaosbluely1339 It is fine where it is, and the F-14A IRIAF isn't. It should be 12.7, 13.0 MAX. Thinking this is on the same level as the F-4F ICE and Su-27S is insane.
Some are, some aren't, they didn't all have the same motor. For example in the irl clip I used later in the video you can see that particular 54C is definitely not smokeless.
@@F-14-W i upload as often as I can, realistically I have no idea how often it will be. Definitely not weekly though. Ill probably do sparrow guide next
Not missile related but radar question : I watch youtube and found some of them have the red square on top of their Radara lock How I can do that if its not a bug and already patch
I believe it has something to do with how responsive missiles are to changes in direction but I don't know for sure and I haven't tested it. Pretty sure more is better across the board though.
@@xalaput3445 sure I can, but the problem is that no other plane have fox3 and good flight perfomence under 13.0 (yeah I think the F14B should be 13.0), like why the mirage2000cs have only 2Fox2 and 2Fox1 stays at the same br with F14A? A skillless player can still use the long range of AIM54/Fakour to get kills even in 13.7. He can just fire and RTB without any cost
@@luoeain2026 The only thing I agree with you is that fakours should be 13.0, but not the american phoenix because they are lacking performance comparing to iranian fakours
If i play my 11.3 f4ej phantom 2 and uptier to see these f14s with fakiurs i just watch 4-8 people drop from fakours long before any enemies are spotted
Too bad it wont go up in a while because low levels play the f14a iriaf a lot more than f14a because how easy it was to get and a ton of people got it.
in comparison to the aim-54 pre update i noticed the Fakour-90 could be used in 10 km or less head on's with 50/50 chance where the aim-54 just couldn't do that, post update Fakour-90's are just busted as someone who doesn't join in on the spam from space and tries using them one of a time the succuss rate I've had has just increased and i'm just a below average player
just got a 7 kill game with a 1v2 situation against JF-7 and a Mig29. they were both mad. I also wasted my sedjeel on a mig15 but they still lost lmao.
Correction: AIM-54 is 17g, not 16. I'm not rerendering the video for that so every time I say 16g imagine it's 17.
A few of the people that proofwatched the video told me that the reduced smoke motor for the phoenix would also have reduced thrust. I still think gaijin could still add it as an option.
The reason I havent uploaded in 3 months is because I've been working full time, and because my videos take so long to make there just aren't enough hours in the day to keep up with both things as much as I'd like to (and I make about 50 cents per hour or less on youtube for reference). I had been trying to make the ARH video for months, but between gaijin changing them and gaijin breaking my tools I've had a very hard time making that video, and I want it to be good. It's still one of my top priorities.
So with that in mind we're very solidly on the "videos happen when they happen" schedule. I really want to finish Jets 101 sometime this fall but I have no clue if that's a realistic goal.
Sorry for rambling and sorry for not being able to deliver what I want to deliver
i decided to try sim and ill be honest I'm hooked, sure its not dcs but its way better than the 16v16 clusterfuck thats ARB and I completely agree we need AIR RB EC. i have noticed that it is way wayyy easier to dodge missiles in simulator battles especially fakours I wonder if you could you know test it out, if not I would love a video about the playstyles of the mig 29s, as I'm still having trouble with the irst hms mode. Great content btw.
No Problem. Normal Life is more important. Take ur time with those Videos, the Quality is what sets u apart from others and i love it. Keep making these bangers
Glad you're managing to do both, life is the priority. Your videos are honestly some of the best for information while also being entertaining, hope you figure out a way to monetize them
@@goldfishPACIFIERwell top tier sim is also all over the place, it’s the same missile spam but there you get launched on as soon as you take off from the airfield.
bro talk to us man we love you dawg don't ever forget that keep up the grind I'm too working 2 jobs and its hard out here but you Gotte keep the pills quiet, or they will make you quiet
Being a fan of Jaek is like being a fan of rice cookers before rice was invented
He should try putting red arrows in his thumbnails
Dayum this is some Confucius type shit
until they were made in 1945
When next video tho?
@@charliezw3287and ishowspeed
I love how they went "hmm, it's already insanely fast, lets make it turn much better now too
Tbf the sedjil was useless before
Your saying that like it’s not how it was in real life. This is not a balancing change.
@@mikeyplayzwrldit’s entirely Irans claims for performance on the missiles. The Sedjil and Fakour have the same motor as the MIM-23B I-Hawk missile which mind you is not a mach 5 missile and even Mach 4 is pushing it.
The G tolerance of 20 is also questionable unless that is the claimed dual axis G pull. Fakour-90 also uses the AIM-54B seeker and electronics so there’s that.
@@mikeyplayzwrld 1. You're* saying that like *you* know how it is in real life. What do you know about it? The sedjeel has been successfuly used IRL against contemporary aircrafts like the Super Etendard ans has been in service since the late 80s.
2. It's a game, if you put a weapon system to be used, it has to be useful. What would be the point of giving a unique missiles that has to be ressearched AFTER the R-27R just to be completely useless.
3. Do you think they just decided to give better fins for no reason just cuz they wanted to? Players bug reported it, they used documents and specs about the HAWK missiles that the sedjeel is based from.
@@TheSpartan227and yet we can’t seemingly bug report other obvious things because gaijin decided it isn’t in need of change, or that the docs are innacurate
A Fox 3 R-27E would be so funny
R-27EA exists, but not in service
@@sooryan_1018It exists as a concept. It’s a theory missile.
@sooryan_1018 It's definitely in service. You see it sometimes in videos of Su-27's and Tu-95's being intercepted over international waters between Alaska and Russia. If you see a Flanker or even a Fullback with an R-27, 98% of the time it's gonna be an EA. The 27ER has pretty much been retired simply because it's old and obsolete. I wouldn't be surprised if Russia sold their old R-27's to country's like North Korea, Iran, and Pakistan to fund their war.
@@thesolstice_8122 Russia definitely WON'T be giving to Pakistan, because of India
They had previously given Gsh-23 gun and the MiG-29 engine to Pakistan (for JF-17) but giving a missile itself would alert their close ally. So prob not
But yea they'd definitely try to sell to others like Iran and DPRK
How amazing. That ONE time I skip on a WT event we actually get a good aircraft.
It's also the only event vehicle I ever got, and I pretty much got it for free.
@@titanfallgamerwithnotitanf8187 Chad
@@titanfallgamerwithnotitanf8187same lmfao. Glad I grinded it
I grinded zombers (killing them, not being them) in sim and got a tradeable coupon. Looking at buffs to its is absolute stonks.
"Discussions about missiles especially regarding their implementation relative to real life performance usually devolve into an Autism contest" has got to be the most accurate way to describe War thunder Forum debates i've ever heard.
At this point just give it the R-73 over the 9P and bump it's BR up the rumour of testing is only slightly more dubious than it having test fired the R-27
Then it should get the r27ER for people who arent morons and can dodge the aim54/fakour easily
13.3 - 13.7 is were it belongs now.
@@avtomat6471 No.
@@Red_Lion2000 Yes.
@@bigtony4930 You think the fakour is harder to dodge than the aim120?
Another problem with the aim-54A and C not listed in the video is their absolutely pathetic lofting profile especially in comparison with the revised lofting profiles of the fox-3’s that were added after the Phoenix but fixed before the Phoenix.
I mean, if Gaijin wanted to give the Phoenix a side-grade option, they could have two separate models of the C. One with the Mk.47 Rocketdyne motor, and the other with the Mk.60 Aerojet motor. The Mk.60 would have less burn time but more thrust. But range was always supposed to be the Phoenix's main selling point. Not agility. The main issue I have with Phoenix's performance is that the loft profile is kinda fucked. Phoenix should not be practically dead on energy with a mere 80km (~50 mi) shot when launched from high altitude considering the missile has a max IRL range of ~200km (~120 mi). The loft profile is mainly to blame for this lack of end-game energy and range. Fix that and the missile is great even without multi-plane maneuvering modeled.
both aim 54 motors are almost identical
the aim 54 should just be buffed to a 22 or 20g missile and maybe get its drag adjusted but that may fuck up it’s close range performance even more so idk
@@jaek__ My understanding is the Mk.60 burns harder but for shorter (~17000N vs ~13500N but for ~20 seconds instead of ~27).
Is this accurate?
@@Registered_Simp no i don’t think there is any discernible difference in the mk 47 and mk 60 motor, at least no evidence there is
@@Registered_Simp Imo it should have the stronger, but shorter burn time engine, as it doesn't really affect the maximum distance that much
Edit: it will also be able to reach mach 5 as it's supposed to (the A is the one that goes mach 4.3)
Definitely agree that the Phoenix should be given a little more love in terms of its maneuverability. After watching some videos online featuring what it can do during test firings and training shots, it definitely should be able more maneuverable compared to what it is now
That is because Gaijin 1. Artificially nerfed them and continues to for “balance”.
2. Gaijin doesn’t take into account some missiles are designed to use dual axis movement to achieve more pull than it normally would when limited to single axis.
Yeah the problem with the Phoenix is Gaijin is basing its max G load off what it could pull with one set of fins. IRL the Phoenix would roll to 45 degrees from the direction it wanted to turn and use both sets of fins to turn
Also the reduced smoke motor would be a big help, the fantasy version they have in game is pretty stupid and seems to be a game of balancing radar missiles to the level of eastern missiles and making them all have smoke for better gameplay. The AMRAAMs being the silliest example I think.
@@ICECAPPEDSKY Gaijin had to nerf the phoenixes for "balance" reasons yet they'll refuse to move the F-14 from 12.3, and would randomly ass pull a nonexistent aphe round that can one shot tanks into two soviet premium strike aircrafts in one patch. I fucking hate this company.
@@r1zmy the F14’s can’t go higher than 12.7 generally or they will get brutalized (except Iran F14) if the Phoenix got buffed they’d be forced to move them which they don’t want to up in br.
iran F14 is likely going to inevitably go up to 12.7 to maybe even 13.3 or something after Veteran players abuse it to grind out air events.
Old film near the end casually showing the Aim54 turn like a crack demon lmfao
Oh Jesus christ I didn't see that til now what THE FUCK
its good to see you back in uploading 🔥🔥
More punishment for the 11.3s who already suffer from the Tomcats.
If you want the iranian tomcat to go in a higher br it should have the r73 and the iranian rwr
i think they either should give it a proper rwr and move it up or give it the r73s and move it up either way it cant stay at 12.3
with how well the missiles outperform Fox 3s, it should at least go up to 12.7 or 13.0.
@@r1zmythey have like 3km better range than the Aim-120, but on the other hand, their one-chaffed while notching or going cold, they have bad manuverability, they hold less energy at longer ranges, they’re heavier, they can be shot down and detected in radar because of their sheer size, their acceleration of the rail is worse and their close range performance is non-existent. No.
A Jaek video in 2024, feelsgoodman
You know whats better than the Fakour in an 11.3 match?
The Model 1055i Combine Harvester with 119HP
(Manufactured in Iran)
Yay have been waiting for ur vids. The wait has been answered!
Yeap as u said, Sedjil is a very viable option for longer ranged SAR missile shots....
Another potential "fix" to the AIM-54C would be gaijin unfucking its guidance code.
Atm, the 54C has the exact same guidance code as the 54A, while IRL the 54C has a completely new and vastly more advanced guidance section that was specifically made to allow it to follow more complex and optimized trajectories (better loft and energy management in-game), mostly to improve its pK% vs small and maneuvrable targets. This wouldnt make it get to a target faster, but it would allow it to have more energy WHEN it gets to the target, making it significantly more dangerous.
The kick in the dick about the Fakour-90 is that not only does it have a much better rocket motor, and better maneuverability, it ALSO got much better guidance code compared to the AIM-54C, cuz fuck TT F-14 players I guess...
People dying and complaining about the Phoenix will never be not funny.
baddie RWR
They definitely need to implement BTT as that will also benefit rolling airframe missiles like the whole issue with manpads rn. Additionally, the CnP AAM3s will finally get their accurate 40g capability and magic 2s will have their maneuverability accurate as well
Welcome back Jaek
Missed you bro
finally i thought you were never going to upload any video Jaek
also can you do a general review on top tier ARH missiles
from the AIM-120
all the way to the Derby ?
I still want to do that but I've been having problems with the testing setup being buggy, if I can get that ironed out it will be a priority 100%. Dont want to spread misinformation.
Bro really turning out to be the Zenturion of the new War Thunder age
JAEK!!!! Feel like I haven’t seen a video of yours in a while. I love the new f14
You won my like with the music before the video even started.
Very good video !
Could you do another Fox-3 missile comparison just like you did when they first appeared on the dev server?
finally a new video!
Welcome back goat
Great look at the update for this
Most often Jaek upload schedule
Frankly I thought the tradeoff for the Fakour was the fact it couldn't pull as much. But now it's just straight up better in every way. I gave it a go yesterday with the Sedjeel's and definitely found a lot more success with both as long as I took reasonable shots. I took about a 26km shot with the Sedjeel on a guy I saw contrailing and they went evasive and even got into a notch but my radar never broke lock and the missile hit. It was definitely having to maneuver a lot.
That radar thing at the start was pretty cool
I’m a simple man I see jaek upload I click
You need to make more videos man. Incredible
Man i‘m so happy not to have sold the f14
i think it would be best to give it its R73s, remove the R27R1 since irl it never worked with the tomcat´s radar, buff the Sedjill (not really, just detail more its seeker, cus irl it could never have been an 7F/M copy or similar, since iran never received its AIM7F and its AIM9Ls because of political reasons, just give it DL (if it had irl) and its okay, i think they added a HMD later, but i suppose it would have been just for the R73s since i find difficult for iran to make russian equipamment work with american Radar set. yes it would be a late variant of the Persian Cat, but still, the Fakour 90 is a missile that only the F14s iran is using today are equipped with, the F14 Early that is shown ingame should have AIM54As only, since the Fakour 90 is only equipped on later variants that iranian sources say that are completely different planes from what they once was. (without any proof off course) but still, if all this were to be added, it would be 13.0 material, even with only 60 CMs
edit: fuck it, you could put it on 13.3 and the Fakour spam would still kill a lot of guys.
They never had HMD, the R27R1 should stay since it’s unique, and 13.3 is unacceptable for the F-14
@@mikeyplayzwrld and planes without RWR facing FOX3s are totally acceptable ofc.
I totally agree with the idea of this plane getting a higher BR like 13.0 but the RWR on this sh*t is just useless for top tier meta so idk
13.0 is too much.
Huh, and I always thought they were just shiny Aim54As. Explains why I died so much to them before I started treating like all the top tier Fox 3s.
Nice video!
guess who's back, back again
you failed to mention that the update broke the radar on the F-14 IRIAF. I can't maintain a lock on ANYTHING.
I didn't notice anything different. I've never liked the awg9 though, it's a very picky radar.
@@jaek_898 I've never had issues like this before, it never used to get confused by chaff while in a head on engagement, now it does.
just happened to me twice in a row. meanwhile, my chaff does nothing even from rear aspect, I've got to WT notch everything, which isn't how you really notch. in WT, you gotta present the largest profile possible, angle your top towards the radar locking you. it'll break lock beyond 5 km within seconds. which is wild, it shouldn't be like that, it should really be the opposite, but that's how it works in this game.
Ah enjoyment…
yeah I love the
Was waiting for your video... good stuff. I Saw Gajin making it 12.7 at first just due to having the R27Rs for head-on(harder to dodge than AIM 7s), now with all these other buffs 12.7 is a guarantee. It was an easily grindable/purchasable vehicle so I feel like newb players poor stats will keep it 12.7 instead of a firm 13.0
It will not see 13.0 and 12.7 is pushing it without an all aspect it missile.
Maybe this will get them to fix existing weapons and systems and bring the game as a whole up to modern speed and not auto gimping or nerfing things on release because their game can’t handle it.
I am gonna be honest:
I have a massive skill issue with the F-14 Iriaf.
Barely get kills with it, even with the fakours, I guess I am just launching at the wrong targets.
However, even with my massive skill issue, I can say that the only thing holding this plane back from being 100% broken instead of just 90%, is the RWR and relatively low countermeasures.
This thing is otherwise just criminal, especially now that the Sedjeel is no longer a gimmick and actually is scary.
Fly level until you reach at least mach .8 then enter a ~30 degree climb up to about 4-5k meters. Switch to TWS HDN, 93km range, with the narrower search pattern. Find a group of 3 or 4 people flying at more or less the same altitude and launch at 40-45km on all targets, making sure to keep at least one of them tracked with TWS while diving down and cranking. Once you see that the target indicator on the radar scope switches to a solid line, instead of a line and a circle, then that means the missile(s) have gone active and are guiding with their own radar. At that point you can stop tracking the targets with TWS and enter a notch to defend against enemy missiles.
The narrower TWS search pattern gives you more frequent updates and lets the missile guide more precisely and launching at 40-45km gives the missiles a good amount of energy to hit maneuvering targets. By firing at enemies that are at more or less the same altitude as each other, you can keep all of them locked with TWS at the same time and effectively guide all your missiles until they go active. Its very important that you provide the missiles with tracking from your TWS otherwise they'll just fly off in a general direction and may not actually lock anything at all.
@@moldypotato4656why was none of this shit ever told to me or anyone but I'll probably forget
@@moldypotato4656 Except for me firing from roughly 60 km, this is already exactly what I am doing.
I will check in a few minutes if the additional 20 km really make that much of a difference
I will gladly spend 100 hours in your stead, to definitely settle missile performance arguments. Only for Gaijin to say no.
But it still can't load 6 Fox 3
@@mich421 there's an open bug report about that so it might be able to in the future
Wow no wonder so many people have been dying I didn’t even know these things got buffed
There was no way for you to know either, gaijin didn't even put it in the patch notes
I mean I just don't want to play the IRIAF because GE'ing parts to get basic access to my missiles is dog and fighting infinite fakuours on the enemy team is annoying lol (11.3-12.3 is all US vs US)
IMO Gaijin should just give AIM-54s 25G with a higher lofting profile 9M for 14B and kick the F-14s up a BR, good for everyone
FINALLY
Aim-54A Block 50, Block 52, and Aim-54C Block 60. The 52 has a smokeless motor. More range and the same everything else. Aim54C has a better seeker. less range smokeless. Yourwelcome for the dumb down explanation I fly dcs tomcats lol
oh and iranian tomcats irl fly with R-73 and wev seen R-77 mounted on them. no confirmation of flying sorties with them though.
Could you give a source for the R77 on the tomcat? That’s super interesting.
Hey man, I know you don't own the rights to it, but I've been planning on using music from Ace combat, specifically five which I see you've done, in my own videos. I want to see if you're cool with that just so I'm not stepping on toes. I'm a super small channel but I'd still hate to ruffle any feathers if this is kind of your thing
Lol it's all good and it's not like I own the rights to the music or anything (I wasnt the first to use it either)
@@jaek_898 I gotcha, still think it's polite to ask since seeing your video reminded me of it. Is combat four was actually the first game I ever played. Very fond memories
Can we get an updated fox 3 comparison after all the changes theyve had?
i prefer the regular f14a, better short range sarh missiles, can carry more fox 3 missiles and actually useable ir missiles
Nah the r27 is just better. Especially for short range.
As long as they raise the BR AFTER I get the missiles
Holding f14ariaf coupon is reeeeally hard 😢
Gaijin is selling the Iranian F-14 thru the market place.Just another way to sell a "premium" without people screaming at you!!That is why they buffed it....
They don't sell the tomcat, other players do but sales do benefit them because selling a tomcat will give you gjn coin which you can only spend on wt, while person buying it likely used real money so the money still remains in game
Did you use the Ace Combat music from that night canyon run? Am I imagining things?
Not that I know of, this is just the music from AC5
nice
I'm dreaming right?
Jaek uploaded
let's hope he doesn't forget his password next time 🙏🏽🙏🏽😭
That password is a goner, see you next spring
@@jaek_898 ahhh hell nahh
no wonder it sold mine like by the sec i put into gaijin market
Been saying since the event ended the Iranian f14 should be at a bare minimum 13.3. It should be facing f4ice, not early f16 and mig29
You’re delusional. 12.7 is the maximum for an F-14A airframe
@@mikeyplayzwrld airframe doesn't matter when it doesn't have to dogfight
@@mikeyplayzwrld and by your logic an f4ice should be 12.7 because of its ass airframe
@@TeamValkyrie2023it has aim120 , modified aim9L that has a aim9m seeker and fa18 radar that gives it tws its fine where it is
@@captchaosbluely1339 It is fine where it is, and the F-14A IRIAF isn't. It should be 12.7, 13.0 MAX. Thinking this is on the same level as the F-4F ICE and Su-27S is insane.
25 minutes ago is despicable
I am so ready to sell the jet
The a 54C is supposed to be smokeless
Some are, some aren't, they didn't all have the same motor. For example in the irl clip I used later in the video you can see that particular 54C is definitely not smokeless.
3:09 marginally
Jaek where have you been man, it’s been so long since you’ve posted a video
been busy with work mostly
@@jaek_898 are u gonna post regularly again or is it gon be a while till we see an updated fox3 and sparrow guide
@@F-14-W i upload as often as I can, realistically I have no idea how often it will be. Definitely not weekly though.
Ill probably do sparrow guide next
Give IRIAF 6 Fox 3's and move to 13.0
Not missile related but radar question : I watch youtube and found some of them have the red square on top of their Radara lock How I can do that if its not a bug and already patch
@@darlooksansatom7921 can you send me a screenshot in my discord server? Im not sure what you mean
In Jaek we trust 😎
New Vid !!! 🙌
Definitely belongs at 13.0 or above now.
F16 ADF with AIM7 and 9L - 13.0 / F14A IRIAF with absolutely mad misiles - 12.3. It look's In GAYjin mind that make sense🤡
What is max fin lateral acceleration? What does it show in game?
I believe it has something to do with how responsive missiles are to changes in direction but I don't know for sure and I haven't tested it. Pretty sure more is better across the board though.
Fakour 90 is R-37M lite
Maia Oval
I think all the F14A need to go up like 0.3br, both of them are ruining the 11.3-12.3
How so?
@@mikeyplayzwrld for they r the only planes has Fox3 in such low BR
@@luoeain2026 Yeah but if you are not sleeping while playing war thunder then it must be no problem for you to dodge their missiles
@@xalaput3445 sure I can, but the problem is that no other plane have fox3 and good flight perfomence under 13.0 (yeah I think the F14B should be 13.0), like why the mirage2000cs have only 2Fox2 and 2Fox1 stays at the same br with F14A? A skillless player can still use the long range of AIM54/Fakour to get kills even in 13.7. He can just fire and RTB without any cost
@@luoeain2026 The only thing I agree with you is that fakours should be 13.0, but not the american phoenix because they are lacking performance comparing to iranian fakours
If i play my 11.3 f4ej phantom 2 and uptier to see these f14s with fakiurs i just watch 4-8 people drop from fakours long before any enemies are spotted
This is definitely preparing it for being bumped to 12.7, it was already quite OP at 12.3 with the prebuff missle in the right hands
More like 13.0 or 13.3
@@VIT-ey8wo this. It slaughters even stuff like the mig 23. It needs to be at 13.0 at a minimum.
@@VIT-ey8woNo.
@@BlackWolf9988MiG-23 doesn’t get slaughtered lol. It’s underteired too.
Another iranian W
The missiles are good but the RWR and radar (in TWS) are both pretty awful
Too bad it wont go up in a while because low levels play the f14a iriaf a lot more than f14a because how easy it was to get and a ton of people got it.
My F-14 coupon: Stonks~^
📈
Yeah, just sell it before the nerf comes
I’m probably gonna take the r27er1s anyways because I never actually get a sarh kill from more than 8 km
But it doesn't have ERs
@@Danknic1234 wait which one does it have then? I thought it was the r27er no?
@@Duality.12 it's the export R1 version
@@Danknic1234 what’s the main difference?
@@Duality.12 Just the speed as the ERs are much faster that's as far as I or anyone knows
It’s just such a no skill plane tbh firing off fakour going RTB then doing the same is so gay
I sold mine...
aim-54 is a joke of missile at this point
in comparison to the aim-54 pre update i noticed the Fakour-90 could be used in 10 km or less head on's with 50/50 chance where the aim-54 just couldn't do that, post update Fakour-90's are just busted as someone who doesn't join in on the spam from space and tries using them one of a time the succuss rate I've had has just increased and i'm just a below average player
just got a 7 kill game with a 1v2 situation against JF-7 and a Mig29. they were both mad. I also wasted my sedjeel on a mig15 but they still lost lmao.
Where’s the sparrow vid ?!
@@argonbox74 unlisted, check playlists. Needs to get remade.
wtf!
Jackson Dorothy Lewis Deborah Robinson Paul
12.3 br... wild
Allen Kevin Martin Jason Martinez Susan
Miller Barbara Garcia Paul Harris Karen