Full Wash LG WT7305CW AGITATOR Washer Shirts etc

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 143

  • @jakekeiser7087
    @jakekeiser7087 3 роки тому +81

    As an owner of this machine, I would say that Deep Wash and Heavy Duty are really the only two cycles with the best agitation from this machine. All other cycles do not seem to overturn the clothes well at all. The heavy duty cycle lasts well over an hour, but if you choose TurboWash, it cuts the time to just a little over an hour. Deep Wash is our favorite cycle as of late, no need for Deep Fill the machine senses the proper amount of water. We only used the Normal cycle once, and will never use it again, there is no way the machine uses enough water on the Normal cycle. The Speed Wash cycle, as long as you use Deep Fill or Deep Fill Max, is honestly not that bad if you need clean clothes quick. Just some tips and tricks for anyone interested.

    • @HooverLux
      @HooverLux 3 роки тому +3

      I absolutely agree with you, any other cycle is just so weak.

    • @a111z
      @a111z 3 роки тому +6

      I also own this machine, I use speed wash with deep fill for lightly soiled laundry, deep wash for normal loads, and heavy duty + deep fill max for anything that’s actually dirty.

    • @jakekeiser7087
      @jakekeiser7087 3 роки тому +2

      @@a111z that’s exactly what I do! Those are the only settings that I use. The other ones are useless to me.

    • @beetlejes
      @beetlejes 3 роки тому +2

      I agree. The normal setting is practically useless unless you need to wash a small breed dog, or one sock. The dog could literally just walk around in the shallow, gentle water for 57 minutes. On a serious note, when you use warm or hot water, with Deep Fill, do you get condensation on the left, and right side of the lid, as well as the grey lip of the lid? I have to get a replacement dryer because it arrived with a huge dent on the side, and I need to know if the washer needs to be replaced as well, or if this condensation situation is normal for this particular machine.

    • @a111z
      @a111z 3 роки тому +1

      @@beetlejes warm or hot produces uniform condensation under the lid.

  • @ic1815
    @ic1815 3 роки тому +34

    Interesting. While I want to like it, and I do appreciate what LG is trying to accomplish, I wish the agitation was stronger.

    • @russ5024
      @russ5024 2 роки тому +4

      Yeah, agitation reminds me of "hand wash" speed of the washers of the 1960s & 1970s.

  • @LlyleHunter
    @LlyleHunter 3 роки тому +11

    When spinning up the agitator and its spiral vanes remind me of those spinning plastic flowers that you see in a corn field.

  • @kimberleytui179
    @kimberleytui179 3 роки тому +16

    OLD SCHOOL STILL BEST!

  • @johnsheets6902
    @johnsheets6902 3 роки тому +17

    Seems to me that engineers in trying to gain that little extra bit of efficiency are sacrificing getting the clothes clean or rinsing out excess water. Can’t say this machine would be a keeper. Must say I do love the channel.

  • @annemariepirrotta1035
    @annemariepirrotta1035 2 роки тому +4

    This machine seems fine to me. I just purchased the CV model and the matching dryer with the door that opens in two different ways. I have had my LG front load washer and dryer for more than 5 years never experienced a problem with them. The front load washer along with the new dryer will be moved to the basement apartment for my daughter to use. The top load washer will be more comfortable to use in the upstairs laundry room.Also with the front load washer my favourite cycles were the permanent press and towels. I would sometimes use cotton normal or bulky wash if I wanted extra water and occasionally delicate. I used Tide free pods and unscented bounce sheets in the dryer. I purchased LG again because like me my son has had front loaders for more than 10 yrs without a problem. When I get the top load washer I'm sure I will figure out which cycles to use. There was some good advice on the previous comments, thank you.

    • @minafong5888
      @minafong5888 9 місяців тому

      I bought a front load LG lately , how come I always worry that the water is not enough to clean the clothes and I feel itchy ! I regretted buying a front load washer I used to have a top load

    • @annemariepirrotta1035
      @annemariepirrotta1035 9 місяців тому +1

      My post is from 2 yrs ago, the lg washers and dryers are still good.

  • @bsgarey
    @bsgarey Місяць тому +1

    I have no issues with this machine. I use the Normal, Heavy duty, and Bedding settings according to the load. This machine does not wear out your clothes. I have much less lint in the dryer as well. You don't need to tear you cloths apart to get them clean.

  • @dmana3172
    @dmana3172 2 роки тому +5

    It didn't cleaned my clothes as good as the 2006 whirlpool washer. Should I keep the old one and refurbish it?

  • @marcusmarkus3266
    @marcusmarkus3266 3 роки тому +7

    Great Post.. This washer isn't too bad. again its made to wash small loads of clothes or delicate clothing with this type of agitation. To make this washer more competitive, it should have a low impact/high impact agitation option. Low impact for smaller and delicate clothing and High impact for items such as sheets, jeans ,towels and bulky items. This machine is incapable of wash ing 5 pairs of jeans or 10 bath towels thoroughly.

  • @joekelley5121
    @joekelley5121 Місяць тому

    I'm here 3 years later. I was looking for a video to show me if this is really the agitation the LG uses. It's so slow! Does it it really get the clothes clean? I'm used to a fast back and forth the last 50 plus years. I hope I didn't make a mistake buying this one.

  • @malanprevost3360
    @malanprevost3360 3 роки тому +9

    Wow, what turbulence!! More turbulence in the toilet when you flush it.

  • @California_Nation_Laurent
    @California_Nation_Laurent 3 роки тому +4

    Hi Eugene, thanks for your time in doing another video. As with most of the LG's you film, I'm only giving a thumbs up for YOU and not the machine. I do not like LG, this machine is yet further proof, to me, that they don't know what they are doing. So thumbs up for you and a negative -10/10 for the washer. Thanks again, Laurent.

  • @ArcolaBridge
    @ArcolaBridge 2 роки тому +4

    This machine seems to work. But the agitator is too short and also does not continuously screw the clothes down into the water. It's back and forth motion disrupts the famous downward screw agitation of the maytag.

  • @washer1118
    @washer1118 3 роки тому +4

    As far as h.e goes the best washer was the whirlpool/ admiral with the dual agitator 👍 and the recent Maytag commercial that’s not bad at all 👍 everything else is a load of toss

    • @pianotutoring6954
      @pianotutoring6954 2 роки тому +1

      I have the maytag commercial with the black control panel. It does clean like a beast, however I can’t make it switch to normal 1/2 load for smaller loads. It’s a shame. I’m too cheap to pay anyone to come look at it.

  • @ArcolaBridge
    @ArcolaBridge 2 роки тому +1

    What machine is best? I like LG front loads best, but I wish there was a 5.8 CB FT top load with full size continuous screw agitator.

  • @missgigi04
    @missgigi04 Рік тому +2

    I’m bout to send this back & but a used machine from the 80’s-90’s…

  • @angiedavisson3243
    @angiedavisson3243 2 роки тому +3

    I will stick with my Maytag commercial washer. Too bad they don't make a larger version of the Maytag commercial washer. It would be worth its weight in gold.

  • @mikeschulte4271
    @mikeschulte4271 3 роки тому +9

    This agitation could be used on delicate cycle. This is not heavy enough even for normal. The old direct drive washers actually needed slow agitation cycles because they were actually aggressive and got ur clothes clean unlike these pos machines now

  • @petermaz701
    @petermaz701 3 роки тому +6

    It did reasonably well, agitator strokes could have been longer would’ve had better turnover.

  • @lindagulla1746
    @lindagulla1746 10 днів тому

    How do it find the filter to clean this washer.

  • @biggbobb7696
    @biggbobb7696 2 роки тому

    Hi Eugene. I need your advice. I need a new washer preferably top load. Can’t spend over six hundred. Don’t need lots of bells and whistles. Just a dependable machine that gets my clothes clean. What do you suggest?

  • @denster1964
    @denster1964 2 роки тому +2

    I’ve owned the impeller model of this machine (WT7300CW) for two years now and thought the agitator model would be better than it. After watching several videos of this model and its Wash action, I can say that I’m glad I didn’t buy it. This model literally plays peekaboo with the clothes, while mine cleans properly and will actually bring the clothes from the center and recirculate the clothes to the bottom. To me, it is what the original concept of an HE machine was but better and cleans clothes. LG is probably the only brand of HE top loaders I’ll ever buy.

  • @stephenma2696
    @stephenma2696 2 роки тому

    Can you able to do one washing down filled jacket? I know shall be using front load washer, I just wonder new lg agitator can be done? Thanks

  • @scottweaverphotovideo
    @scottweaverphotovideo 2 роки тому +3

    It put too much water into the tub. I notice with these machines it's always too little or too much. The new models with agitators are definitely an improvement. I don't find the impeller only models to be very effective, especially with sheets and blankets.

  • @C1200A
    @C1200A 3 роки тому +6

    Is electricity that cheap in the US? it's heating a lot of water for some shirts... A front loader would've been more efficient and clean those shirts better.

    • @patcola7335
      @patcola7335 3 роки тому +3

      Why is there such a need to be "efficient"? just sounds like a code word for control.

    • @C1200A
      @C1200A 3 роки тому +2

      @@patcola7335 tf 😂😂
      Tell me when your washer doesn't heat up a whole soupworth of water to heat 5 tshirts.
      "Code word for control" control what?

    • @patcola7335
      @patcola7335 3 роки тому +3

      @@C1200A Why is it your business how much water my washing machine uses to clean my clothes? Please tell me who put a limit on the amount of water that we could use to do anything?. If it was up to people like you and your "efficiency".. none of us would have full fill top load washers and the "watchdogs" of the masses are making that a reality by degrees.

    • @C1200A
      @C1200A 3 роки тому +3

      @@patcola7335 aMeRICa fReE CONtRy

    • @patcola7335
      @patcola7335 3 роки тому

      @@C1200A Why do you spell like that ? It Isn't only "aMeRICa", which includes North ,Central and south aMeRICa" but Australia and New Zealand. Quite a bit of people like their top loading agitator washers. Do you believe God made all things ?

  • @robinturner6639
    @robinturner6639 2 роки тому

    if i add clothes after the wash has started will if bounce all over the place like my roper washer dearing the spin cycle?

  • @markaustin4370
    @markaustin4370 3 роки тому +5

    Doesn’t make sense to me that the screw shaped agitator works in both directions. It would clean better if it only pushed clothes down the agitator casing a good roll and forcing all clothes into the deep water. I’ve had Whirlpool machines with a similar agitator shape that only goes one direction

    • @markaustin4370
      @markaustin4370 3 роки тому +6

      Case in point. The yellow and blue shirts are almost always at the top. The tub needs to stop moving and the agitator move only counter clockwise

    • @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980
      @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980 3 роки тому

      @@markaustin4370 That's a lie. You are just blind, let alone not paying close attention at all.

    • @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980
      @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980 3 роки тому

      @@markaustin4370 No duh the tub is supposed to move. It's called HE for a reason. It is made to give you better efficiency in washing.

    • @patcola7335
      @patcola7335 2 роки тому +5

      @@AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980 There is no "efficiency" if the clothes are not getting scrubbed in some way. If this had taller agitator fins at the base this would have done a lot better in rolling the clothes over.

    • @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980
      @AndrewAddisonUniqueDrewski980 2 роки тому

      @@patcola7335 Yes there is efficiency there. You obviously are delusional.

  • @davedebang-bang6168
    @davedebang-bang6168 3 роки тому +1

    Thank god top loaders are quite rare in the uk, give me a front load machine anyday

    • @jackoff1826
      @jackoff1826 3 роки тому +1

      Today's top loaders are crap compared to the old ones. Can thank government for that. Do they make front loaders that can last 25+ years without issues?

    • @richardmaher7629
      @richardmaher7629 3 роки тому +1

      @@jackoff1826 I'd take a front loader any day. Superior cleaning using less resources. We got a Frigidaire FL in 2006 which has been passed along to family members and it is still going strong with no repairs. Last six years we have had an LG FL that is excellent.

    • @jackoff1826
      @jackoff1826 3 роки тому +1

      @@richardmaher7629 the wash quality is better with front loaders. They require maintenance to prevent mold (usually needing the door to be left open) and whatever it is that needs cleaned out about monthly (usually up front at the bottom) and with typical usage they have a lifespan of about 11 years, they all have a known design flaw of the Web that holds the basket on. Not worth fixing when it goes bad. And that's all with hoping the motherboard has no issues between then.
      Best wishes with your two.

  • @amandasteven1400
    @amandasteven1400 2 роки тому +1

    when all else fails? FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS :)

  • @benjaminschultz2582
    @benjaminschultz2582 7 місяців тому

    Agitation could be stronger. The thing actually fill rinses!

  • @roselyncampisi822
    @roselyncampisi822 3 роки тому +1

    Not impressed. Still waiting for my maytag. I really like the older wash machines. I wish I had my grandmas old maytage with the rollers on it. I think I would get better cleaner clothes!

  • @howarddaley1161
    @howarddaley1161 3 роки тому

    Oh, for that price point no steam, or onboard heater.,c'mon LG. Thier going to make Miele, or Bosch a good option.

  • @joekelley5121
    @joekelley5121 Місяць тому

    I fear I'm stuck with a sub par washer.

  • @LlyleHunter
    @LlyleHunter 3 роки тому +3

    Small but stinky. Eugene never fails to make me laugh.

  • @carlinhagames9861
    @carlinhagames9861 2 роки тому

    nao tem no brasil, que chaot, porque a marca tem naoo que veder no basirl? porfavor, bota essa maquna de lavar aqui no brasil

  • @arevee9429
    @arevee9429 3 роки тому +3

    Use unscented detergent. Problem solved.

    • @alecvip7562
      @alecvip7562 3 роки тому +1

      The point of using the tide is so that he can smell if it was rinsed out good. If this washer did a good job rinsing the clothes, it would barely have a smell of tide.

    • @arevee9429
      @arevee9429 3 роки тому

      @@alecvip7562 An additional rinse, perhaps?

    • @alecvip7562
      @alecvip7562 3 роки тому

      @@arevee9429 most people don't use an extra rinse

    • @alecvip7562
      @alecvip7562 3 роки тому +1

      @@arevee9429 any good washer will rinse it well on the first rinse

    • @jackoff1826
      @jackoff1826 3 роки тому

      @@alecvip7562 I'd prefer a washer with an extra rinse option and use it exclusively on all loads. Acting like machines are made well to do everything you need is almost unheard of.

  • @nezukochan27298
    @nezukochan27298 3 роки тому +1

    I would go for their QLed Tv”s instead 🤣

    • @jackoff1826
      @jackoff1826 3 роки тому +1

      The brain washing machine

  • @alecvip7562
    @alecvip7562 3 роки тому +3

    Agitator isn't that good in this machine :(

    • @Blackdragon79
      @Blackdragon79 3 роки тому

      I think that's LG goal for it not to be good

  • @Tigger81762
    @Tigger81762 3 роки тому +2

    I’m sorry I just don’t like the new washers.

  • @kristinafrancis382
    @kristinafrancis382 2 роки тому +1

    The impeller version is so much better.

  • @websurfin9575
    @websurfin9575 3 роки тому +1

    I'd be ashamed to dump that JUNK-PILE into a LAND-FILL...... what a piece of CRAP!! It's even to bad to throw into a LAND-FILL!! Just like 95% of ALL new (so-called) washers sold on the market!!

  • @tracyfarmer6259
    @tracyfarmer6259 3 роки тому

    Tide pods stink???????? In the lg that's lg laundry for you tide pods will smell better if you use a whirlpool washer or a maytag

    • @jamescrenshaw3395
      @jamescrenshaw3395 3 роки тому +1

      P0 ju

    • @alecvip7562
      @alecvip7562 3 роки тому +1

      I think he meant it smells too much like the detergent.

    • @tracyfarmer6259
      @tracyfarmer6259 3 роки тому +3

      @@alecvip7562 yes you're right I know he did not mean they stank it depends on the rinse cycle

  • @kimberleytui179
    @kimberleytui179 3 роки тому

    Don't understand LG and more, spray on final spin to reduce spotting butno spray after wash to remove extra detergent residue. Hate final spray as it removes the fabric softener. And I preferliquid over sheets.??????

    • @patcola7335
      @patcola7335 2 роки тому

      That little bit of spray won't do much to take the fabric softener out. They will still have the smell in them.

  • @howarddaley1161
    @howarddaley1161 3 роки тому

    I'm sorry, LG makes a good FL but, this is a epic fail.

  • @kurdtpatton5039
    @kurdtpatton5039 3 роки тому

    Anyone else get the urge to pee around the 36 minute mark?

  • @timsouttahere
    @timsouttahere 3 роки тому +1

    The agitator would be better of it only spun in one direction and wasn't directly connected to the wash plate

    • @LlyleHunter
      @LlyleHunter 3 роки тому +1

      It appears to me that the agitator is working in the opposite direction of the basket.

    • @MichaelRobinson-gz2kj
      @MichaelRobinson-gz2kj 3 роки тому

      Those would be the 700 Rpm machines.

    • @johnalbanese30
      @johnalbanese30 3 роки тому +1

      Really they call that a rinse cycle? Who designed the program, somebody in pre school (sorry I am not insulting the children in pre school) but really. Put the agitator on a boat, it will work better.

    • @LlyleHunter
      @LlyleHunter 3 роки тому +1

      I’m not a fan of this machine. Some of the cycle programs take hours to complete, the wash action is very weak and the machine itself is very lightweight which indicates to me that it’s under built. I do like LG’s televisions. I like them even more than my Samsung.

  • @AhmedAdel-qo9nx
    @AhmedAdel-qo9nx 3 роки тому

    If there is a baby clothes iam sure they will never clean

  • @brokenman-f2t
    @brokenman-f2t 6 місяців тому

    This thing is complete trash. the agitation is worthless. when you have large items like jeans and towels in it it cant even move them they just stays in place. When exactly did washing machines become virtually usless trash like this one? Honestly it seems to do okay with small wash cloths and sock size material.

  • @guitarstar717
    @guitarstar717 Рік тому +1

    Run as fast as you can away from this Horrific LG Washing Machine. I made the Mistake of buying it. When using normal wash it never fills enough water so 90% of the clothes are dry being dragged around not wet. Then when I set it to Deep Fill it over fills the drum "Over The agitator" wasting gallons of water. I swore I would never purchase anything from LG After my Brand New LG Fridge compressor went out it took 2 months to get another one that worked & NOW THIS HORRIBLE LG Washer..