The Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes: The Sovereign and the State

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лют 2018
  • We all live in states today, and Thomas Hobbes has a good claim to have been the first person to articulate this concept in its modern sense. The intention of Hobbes’s civil science was to lower the temperature of politics, and his concept of ‘the state’ does this by standing as a fictitious entity, distinct from both the rulers who hold office and the population over whom rule is exercised. Ironically, once this concept was combined with the later concept of ‘the nation’, producing ‘the nation-state’, the result has often been to raise the temperature of politics to catastrophic levels.
    Director and Animator: Grant Harding
    Writer and Producer: Dr Ryan Walter, Senior Lecturer in Political Economy, School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @Danobot11
    @Danobot11 8 місяців тому +4

    Underrated video. Deserves millions more views.

  • @CodenameRockerika
    @CodenameRockerika Рік тому +4

    I wish there was one of these for Locke. I've not seen a better video for getting from "state of nature" to "sovereign" concisely and with good production value and detail.

  • @meawwow
    @meawwow 3 роки тому +12

    Who made this video. . .Is there a series??
    Please make it a series
    Loved the flow and animations in the video, the director, animator knew and understood the subject❤️

  • @farooqr4646
    @farooqr4646 3 роки тому +28

    Beautifully illustrated. I came to know about Thomas Hobbes recently as a result of listening to a podcast and was intrigued by his philosophy. I always thought that humans were better off living with nature, that as a result of laws and rules we have lost our way of being human but listening to Hobbes I came to a realization that nature is concerned about survival. Survival could mean killing and others taking advantage of the weak. To live in a society rules and laws are essential. Looking to read his book, Leviathan. Thank you for this video.

    • @pingukutepro
      @pingukutepro 3 роки тому

      8 months since you commented. Did you read the book?

    • @jermanizer
      @jermanizer 2 роки тому +1

      there are many people who have effectively critiqued and deconstructed his political and philosophical model(s) presented in Leviathan, so I hope you don't stop here with your readings and treat this as somewhat of a stepping stone

  • @gabyandrews1670
    @gabyandrews1670 5 років тому +10

    Super informative and easy to follow; great video!

  • @jacobroth3300
    @jacobroth3300 2 роки тому +1

    Please make more like these!

  • @stelladejong6495
    @stelladejong6495 Рік тому

    neeeeeeeeeeeeed more of these PLEASE

  • @waistcoat5066
    @waistcoat5066 4 роки тому +14

    the animations made me laugh :) :) thanks! :D

  • @SergioBecerraII
    @SergioBecerraII 2 роки тому

    Excellent teachings.

  • @MAHADEVAARADHY
    @MAHADEVAARADHY 3 роки тому +4

    The animation was so cool I forgot to understand the concept.

  • @dailyprayerandbiblereflection
    @dailyprayerandbiblereflection 6 місяців тому

    Thanks. Nice vid

  • @kingmj87
    @kingmj87 3 місяці тому

    Recommending "In the Hills, the Cities" by Clive Barker. It's a short story about the Leviathan made flesh.

  • @ChunkyAppleCider
    @ChunkyAppleCider 3 роки тому +1

    Thomas Hobbes over here tryna get vore'd by the state

  • @akhilcruz8659
    @akhilcruz8659 3 роки тому +4

    having to watch this for school :0

  • @aclark903
    @aclark903 2 роки тому

    #Augustine may not have described the state in such terms, but his political philosophy in #DeCivitateDei precedes Hobbes by about a 1000 years ..

  • @thekilogram2146
    @thekilogram2146 4 роки тому +3

    hello bucks

  • @werimutamihana1901
    @werimutamihana1901 2 роки тому

    So who exactly is the sovereign?

    • @World_Yourz
      @World_Yourz Рік тому

      can you tell me, if you found out

    • @polisci-dam8828
      @polisci-dam8828 Рік тому +1

      @@World_Yourz Hobbes wrote that once people gave the power to the state, who hobbes deeply implied would be the crown. The Crown would be total soveriegne and the people could only over thow the crown in very few instances. I did a super simplification of it but it kinda gets the point across, if you wanna see the opposite side read about John Locke they were writing on opposite sides of the British Civil War, Hobbes for the crown, and locked for the parliament.

  • @aussiereuben1
    @aussiereuben1 2 місяці тому

    The conclusion that Australia is doing alright with its devided sovereignty is not universally supported. PS: the UK Parliament has been sovereign since the 1660 restoration where the ‘King reigns but does not rule’. The Australian Parliament is a subsidiary of this arrangement, copying the existing model and making a subsidiary of it (Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)) whereby the Commonwealth Parliament is the sovereign, save its being subject to the UK Parliament, and again the King reigns but does not rule.

  • @scytale6
    @scytale6 3 роки тому +1

    There shouldn't be a written constitution. Just statutory law.

  • @akhonasikhakhane39
    @akhonasikhakhane39 3 роки тому

    😂😂😂

  • @pradeeproll-79kumarsingh69
    @pradeeproll-79kumarsingh69 3 роки тому +1

    Hobbs mostuch is very atractive

  • @GeorgWilde
    @GeorgWilde Рік тому

    You didn't even mention the army and the police.

  • @ElParacletoPodcast
    @ElParacletoPodcast 4 місяці тому

    Terrible idea, the only true free way is, the free market capitalist way, with laws, but no government.

  • @kleineitalien4246
    @kleineitalien4246 3 роки тому +2

    Lol, the guy argued with a fable to "justify" the state's existence and people actually bought this stupid idea.