Islam and Liberalism with Ustadh Abdullah Al-Andalusi.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- What is liberalism? Does it fit with Islam? How can muslims navigate liberal societies? All these questions and more with a deeply intelletual lecture with Ustadh Abdalla Al-Andalusi
Ust Abdalla's channel: / abdullahalandalusi
Abdullah al Andalusi a gem for the Ummah
I think this video needs more attention because a lot of people don't know a lot of the things that were mentioned here
Salaam, Invite and interview Robert Dufour from Islam4Europeans channel.
🌹🌹🍉🍉🤲🤲❤️🤔
Hey guys, any good recommendations for books that critically analyze and challenge feminist ideologies?
Too much insistence on virtue can result in harsh, unforgiving societies, as seen in theocratic states and puritan communities. Liberalism respects the autonomy of the individual, unlike authoritarian systems based on political or religious ideology.
Can u please talk about sexual slavery permitted in Islam as "bondwomen"?
Why Islam is encouraging people to do halal things by promising materialistic gains in heaven? Something halal/haram can be considered good if its consequences is common good for the whole society, right?
Most likely, the principle of for so long as you cause no harm what you do is good, and for so long as you consent it is good, these 2 principles are rejected by Muslims as mythological fables, myths, with no proof that they are representative of Justice as it actually is, these differences make Muslims and Secularists have irreconcilable values. This also highlights why Muslims believe an array of things being Justice that Secularists could never justify under their mythology, such as believing in Apostasy Law, Blasphemy Law, Jihad against a non aggressive people, concubinage as you just mentioned. All these laws have elements in them that can't be reconciled under a liberal criteria, but so what? Really, just as Islam is irreconcilable or not compatible with Nazism, Racism, Communism, Marxism, Paganism, Zoroastrianism, and every other mythology and made up set of so called "rational" principles or beliefs, for each group differs in what they believe to be rational, and in fact the doubts of these groups against Islam differ due to their differences in their fictional moral criterions, Islam is also incompatible with this fairy tale made up set of principles called Liberalism, just another invention in the mind like all the other falsehoods that have existed
When you ask why, I estimate you desire an answer that fits the mythological framework called Liberalism, well Islam can't be justified under a framework that rejects the truth, just like how I can't justify anti racist rules of Islam under Racism, or anti Nazi rules of Islam under Nazism, I can't justify rules which are anti secular and by their nature unjustifiable under Secularism, it's like trying to say, show me how your anti racist belief is compatible with my racist criterion which demands that you reject all anti racist beliefs, does that sound sane? Similarly, bringing rules of Islam which are anti Secular, someone comes and says justify these rules which are anti secular under secularism
Why do things become good only by consequences? Why can't they be good even if they lead to pain or are neither painful nor pleasing, and what's with this strange notion of pleasure. All pleasure made out of a thing or is some sort of substance or material, it can't be non existent, do you have an issue that a person experiences pleasure because pleasure is a substance or a thing or a material of some sort? Why is that wrong? Why is that bad? It is Justice in Jannah to have some 70 hoors, it is not immoral, and I think your married to all of them, again this is is how True Justice is, it is irreconcilable with the mythology and fables and fictitious made up guesses of Feminism, Liberalism and all those other Unjust inaccurate guesses of how Morality is
If you have no proof that your moral criterion is representative of True Justice and that it is just as lacking in proof as the mythological moral criterions of Nazism, Racism, Communism etc, you have no business feeling in anyway that you have a moral authority over anyone or the moral high ground, nor should you evoke Justice in any conversation as a way to persuade someone away from something when you have no proof that your following True Justice as it is. The proofs of Islam being True Justice is the Quran and Sunnah, The Inimitability of The Quran, The Intertextuality of The Quran, Prophecies, Hadith Sciences, Proofs of God being behind the Quran rather than a Person, Devils, Angels, Magic, Aliens, gods etc, proofs of the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad and more all indicating this Quran being from an All Knowing Just Lord, so of course he'd Know exactly what's Moral and Immoral
@Abdullah21038 Completely fine. I like your honesty. But don't pretend like Islam is compatible with so called "mythological framework" of democracy, secularism and socialism when you can't win over others in a straight fight.
Though I completely disagree in your claim that liberalism or secularism reject truth, I agree that Islam is not compatible with any of these. You can't arbitrarily compare these ideas with Nazism or Racism which in the first place has rejected the principle of no harm. Everything that's not Islam can't be classified in a single group. To be clear, non Muslims aren't here to subscribe to everything that's unIslamic. Among unIslamic, I do reject communism, Nazism etc which doesn't align with no harm principle. So using such rejected ideas to discredit our ideas by making a baseless similarity claim makes ur argument hollow.
It is something that is not being practiced today bruh. Context of time u melt