Vintage zoom lens for $20... does it suck? | Tokina 28-85mm f4

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @FaeziCarlosHansye-mh7vk
    @FaeziCarlosHansye-mh7vk Рік тому +13

    This Tokina 28-85mm f/4 is actually the Hoya HMC 28-85mmf/4 built & came to market in 1980. Tokina merged with Hoya and produced the AT-X series, SD series. So Tokina launched this zoom with same Hoya optics under Tokina RMC till all Hoya optics passed under the new brand Tokina RMC.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      Really appreciate the insight! That is super interesting

  • @davidheadonvisualsandsound
    @davidheadonvisualsandsound Рік тому +6

    this lens didn't cost $20 in 1977!! it's worth it's weight in GOLD to me, I have about 5- two dirty 'parts' ones, and three nice clean...
    These have amazing feeling and impressive cinematic flares... I also have the 35-105mm and the 45-150mm, they are all Tokina made and superb-

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      They are such good lenses for the price! I didn’t know Tokina made a 45-150!! I have been looking at getting the soligor 45-150 so will have to check that out

    • @davidheadonvisualsandsound
      @davidheadonvisualsandsound Рік тому

      @@calebbrunkow here is a review of the - Soligor/Asanuma/Porst/etc 45-150mm f3.5
      ua-cam.com/video/YCYx6X0IHPY/v-deo.html

  • @josgeusens4637
    @josgeusens4637 Рік тому +3

    I'm not sure if the rotating front is always a problem since the lens is par focal. It will of course be unusable when refocusing while filming (or photographing). Since the price tag, it's actually a negligible con.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      Very true, I mostly meant in case you wanted to put a mattebox or a polarizer filter on the front it would be affected when focusing

  • @khanscombe619
    @khanscombe619 5 місяців тому +1

    Awesome review Kaleb. I have fun trying vintage glass on new digital. Getting them to look better than they could’ve ever in their day.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  5 місяців тому

      They’re definitely fun to mess with and thank you! Glad you enjoyed it

  • @herrreinsch
    @herrreinsch Рік тому +3

    I have this lens, 2x actually. :P the first one for canon fd, and then I liked it so much that I bought a second one for om mount, simply because I now want all of my vintage lenses for ef (because I'm lazy. :P) I paid 35 bucks for each one. but anyways, The 2 vintage zoom lenses I use the most (for filming skateboarding) are the tokina 35-105 3.5 and the canon fd 35-105 3.5, same specs, but completely different look. the canon one has probably my favorite lens flare of all time. It's orange (as all lens flare should be) and because it has so many lens elements you get this crazy look stopped down almost like in an 80s cartoon. It's awesome. :)

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      That is so awesome!! I have an FD 35-105 but haven’t used it a ton, now I need to haha

  • @ChasWG
    @ChasWG 3 місяці тому +1

    I picked up the Vivitar/Tokina 35-105mm f3.5 with Pentax K mount for cheap. It's actually fairly nice lens. It adapts super easy to my RF body and the results are very nice. Pretty darn sharp and useable throughout the focal range. I took it with my on a vacation I took to the East coast earlier this year. I took along a Quantaray 24mm f2.5 also with the PK mount and the combo of those two lenses meant that I didn't have to bring along a lot more lenses. Though I did stuff an Industar N-61 53mm f2.8 into the kit because its so funky and small. That whole kit ended up making me very cool images during the week long trip. The zoom lens was a huge help, though it is a heavy beast. But it has a nice little macro feature that allows it to focus pretty close. Not a true 1:1 macro, but it helps to get you closer to the subject and its useable throughout the focal range. Unlike some other vintage zoom lenses in this same sort of range. Often they can only use the macro feature at the wide end.
    Anyhow, another option.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  3 місяці тому

      Really appreciate the input! Sounds like a great setup you have there

  • @AbraIsaKing
    @AbraIsaKing 26 днів тому +1

    I just ordered a 28-105mm one.. I'm excited 😊

  • @classic.cameras
    @classic.cameras Рік тому +1

    Great to see you again Caleb! Its been awhile.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      Happy to be back! It’s been too long

  • @khanscombe619
    @khanscombe619 5 місяців тому +1

    I wanna use on my (new to me) Canon EOS EF system but w/ a huge Nikon F lens collection & mix of vintage Minolta Kenko Sakar & Voigtlander .
    What’s the best EF for Nikon F that plays well for manual focus assist on a 5D Mk II & M50 Mk II

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  5 місяців тому

      The EF adapters I use for my Nikons are just the K&F concepts, fotodiox, and fotasy I believe

    • @khanscombe619
      @khanscombe619 5 місяців тому +1

      What of the “2” brands feels or play better on Canon 5D Mk iI & M50 Mk II using Nikon Af-s D or Ai-s? Is the FotoDiox worth a $6-10 more ?

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  5 місяців тому

      @khanscombe619 I haven’t experienced them on those cameras but fotodiox is typically a slightly more rugged adapter but for the most part I don’t notice a difference

  • @theBaron001
    @theBaron001 10 місяців тому +1

    Aperture and focal ratio are not the same thing. Aperture is the opening size, focal ratio (f number) is just the ratio of the focal length and aperture. So to have a fixed "focal ratio" zoom (not fixed aperture), as the focal length increases, the aperture would have to increase to keep the same focal ratio. You can see this happening as you zoom, and actually touch on that in the video. So, technically, most zooms are fixed aperture (thats why the f number changes as you zoom), but some expensive zooms are fixed focal ratio.

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  10 місяців тому

      That’s super insightful! I really appreciate that

  • @rodrigoarmeli333
    @rodrigoarmeli333 Рік тому +1

    Nice video ! please try the super takumar 55mm 1.8 ( specially at f16 if you want sharpness, or nice “ bloqué “ at f1.8 ) and warmer characteristics too 👍

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому +1

      Will do! I have one of those lenses but have never really used it much since I have the 50 1.4 as well. I’ll have to test it out more

    • @rodrigoarmeli333
      @rodrigoarmeli333 Рік тому +2

      @@calebbrunkow great! If I’m not wrong, that super takumar is the most sharper of the 50’ ish line. !

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому +1

      I think you’re right

    • @FaeziCarlosHansye-mh7vk
      @FaeziCarlosHansye-mh7vk Рік тому +1

      The Minolta 58mmf/1.2

  • @basukisugito8929
    @basukisugito8929 11 місяців тому +1

    I picked up Tokina 35-105mm f3.5 for 10 USD and I love that lens.

  • @calebgrant6210
    @calebgrant6210 Рік тому +1

    this is killerrrrrr

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  Рік тому

      Thanks dude! Really appreciate the support

  • @cataclysmicproductions
    @cataclysmicproductions 3 місяці тому +1

    you NEED to check PORST lenses

    • @calebbrunkow
      @calebbrunkow  3 місяці тому

      They’ve been on my radar a while! Just haven’t gotten around to them yet

  • @c0smoKram3r
    @c0smoKram3r 11 місяців тому

    Quite a bit less than a tank of gas...