NEW Modern Storm Kills on Turn 2!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 313

  • @HarryMTG
    @HarryMTG  Рік тому +80

    What should I play next?

    • @colgatelampinen2501
      @colgatelampinen2501 Рік тому +4

      Play cycle storm in pauper

    • @youngthinker1
      @youngthinker1 Рік тому +4

      Mardu Knights Pioneer

    • @kerthwack8470
      @kerthwack8470 Рік тому +5

      I wanna watch a video where you are brewing a deck, any format

    • @codefive6480
      @codefive6480 Рік тому

      I love Pauper, and I want to see you try and make a Tethmos High Priest deck. Maybe Selesnya High Priest, with travel preparations and other good GW threshold stuff.

    • @ck3763
      @ck3763 Рік тому +6

      Beast tribal...it wont be good, but you'd get to say everything is an absolute beast

  • @Trip_Fontaine
    @Trip_Fontaine Рік тому +752

    I like how the first opponent says "cringe" as if his deck isn't also effectively a combo deck capable of quick kills.

    • @kateslate3228
      @kateslate3228 Рік тому +85

      If anything opps deck is cringe because it uses the combat step.

    • @DiabloTommaso
      @DiabloTommaso Рік тому +28

      Toxic make salty palyers salty

    • @BingeThinker1814
      @BingeThinker1814 Рік тому +42

      Expectations of originality are more of a multiplayer thing anyway tbh. In 1v1, there's no incentive to play super janky decks because there's no conversation about rule 0, and the type of game people want to play. Criticizing Spike-builds in 1v1 (esp in Legacy lmao) without that prior agreement doesn't work, because jank naturally gets filtered out at competitive levels anyway. If someone insults your build for being boring or cringe in a 1v1, they're basically asking for an easy matchup while they play something more suited to win

    • @swampybwoy
      @swampybwoy Рік тому +9

      Opponent looked in the mirror and cringed

    • @dungeontales8117
      @dungeontales8117 Рік тому +2

      Competative mtg players are so nice....xD

  • @biscuitguy4083
    @biscuitguy4083 Рік тому +284

    The best part was where he ripped that card off the top like an absolute beast

  • @Woollieriowa8
    @Woollieriowa8 Рік тому +146

    that extra +1 toughness on rotpriest is kind of bonkers because it allows you to shoot gut shots at it without it being killed, and since it's a target trigger it's possible to shoot it with a lethal gut shot to get that last poison counter, even if it ends up killing the preist

    • @ulamgexe7442
      @ulamgexe7442 Рік тому +2

      You spelled it strangely, but yes it can help to use gut shot on the rot priest, then use ground rift to get 1 bonus poison counters (per rot priest in play).

  • @TraeKryzer
    @TraeKryzer Рік тому +52

    Opponent: Turn 3 kills
    You: Turn 2 kills in response.
    Opponent: "cringe"

    • @danlorett2184
      @danlorett2184 Рік тому +1

      To be fair... that is pretty cringe for the opponent 😂

  • @kennygrenier4771
    @kennygrenier4771 Рік тому +17

    This was SO well edited and so easy to watch. I want to give you so many kuddos for making it so easy to follow along and see the nuance of the interactions. The video felt short, sweet and full of valid entertaining content. CHEERS.

  • @malcomstringer4619
    @malcomstringer4619 Рік тому +77

    The best part of Rot Priest is that it is a 1/2 meaning, like you saw in game 2, you can target it with Gut Shot/Lava Dart and it survives.

  • @martinrosschou
    @martinrosschou Рік тому +15

    3:35 I can just imagine Harry going "Yes! Yeees! Salt to hightlight, TY TY Opponent! Hahaha, oh right, let me GG him"
    Also the opp missed a huge opportunity to comment something about the deck being Toxic 😆

  • @trenchtierstudios554
    @trenchtierstudios554 Рік тому +14

    I would replace some Channelers and Spellskites with Pact of Negation. So you have a free counter if someone tries to interrupt your combo. Because you're either gonna combo off and win or die next turn to your opponent.

    • @hrodvithit
      @hrodvithit Рік тому

      That is how a lot of tournaments play tho

  • @trubica
    @trubica Рік тому +25

    This is probably my favorite video of yours, I love the complexity of combo decks and the little tricks that reward you for knowing the rules of the game.

  • @spiritwaker9595
    @spiritwaker9595 Рік тому +22

    Storm and Infect were two of my first Modern decks, so seeing this deck is like a warm welcome home
    And Ground Rift reminds me of the Blanka commander decks where that is a valid kill combo path
    Here's to hoping this deck can find its place and tempo. Fun decks are always worth it

    • @greglinsmythe3375
      @greglinsmythe3375 Рік тому

      So you were one of those people

    • @spiritwaker9595
      @spiritwaker9595 Рік тому

      First deck in Modern was Goblin Storm (SUPER Budget), then Infect. I got bored of Infect because it was too Glass-Cannon for me.
      Now, in 2023: Burn and Affinity 8-Cast

  • @pops91
    @pops91 Рік тому +2

    Probably the most important upgrade in this deck imo is noxious revival. Return your toy priest's if they get discarded or removed, it's an extra storm count since you can use it to return mana morphos to top and then use another draw spell to get it back and the card also fills your grave for escape and drc. Try it is a free spell!

  • @ladystardust6861
    @ladystardust6861 11 місяців тому

    Dude this is fucking sick, I love your style of videos. Good mix of gameplay + explaining your thought process. I'd love to see some more legacy/off-key moden lists! Maybe legacy rug delver w/ berserk?

  • @Maybeknot666
    @Maybeknot666 Рік тому +1

    Get travel preparation added to the deck, as it will target both the rotpriest it will give your opponent 4 x poison counters, then you can flashback for another 4, 8 poison counters from 4 mana! Insane

  • @tristanobrien2823
    @tristanobrien2823 Рік тому +5

    I wanna see a few more iterations of this before I make any decisions.
    For instance, I think some number of inkmoth nexus could be useful for racking up the last few poison counters in a game state where you can’t quite combo off.

    • @leftysheppey
      @leftysheppey Рік тому +1

      I think inkmoth is probably bad 99% of the time. In decks like these, where nothing has generic mana costs it will, at best, sit in your hand, and at worst, consume one of your land drops. You could try 1 in the 75 with the 4x Traverse the Ulvenwald, though. I can't see you ever wanting this G1

    • @hrodvithit
      @hrodvithit Рік тому

      Playing a turn 2 kill deck, and a colourless mana in hand is pretty damning. The deck really just isn't made to have a backup.

  • @jonathonscherer
    @jonathonscherer Рік тому +2

    I'm glad to hear that my fellow Scherer, Caleb, has made another Storm list, and you proved that it's pretty good. That said, for future reference(if you plan to make another video about Caleb), our last name is pronounced 'share-er', like someone who shares things. Keep up the great content though!

  • @xWhackoJacko
    @xWhackoJacko Рік тому +5

    Man, I miss SCG coverage. Patrick and Cedric were the shit, and it was the only way for me to really keep up with the game as I no longer have the time to play it. Such a bummer. Anyways, great vid as always

  • @pops91
    @pops91 Рік тому +1

    Fury, subtlety and Ragavan can be a good addition to the deck, use Ragavan for early game ramp from the treasures, fury and subtlety are good sideboard since they can interact with the board buying you one or two turns and the also count towards storm if you evoke them

  • @chrissimonson8613
    @chrissimonson8613 Рік тому +2

    Hey @HarryMTG just wanted to point out your play at 2:35 was tight! Your opponent could've responded to the storm trigger from casting ground rift with bolt if you lead with growth

  • @wbw911
    @wbw911 Рік тому +4

    this set feels a bit like Eldraine level threat across multiple formats...
    but we'll see how it goes from here...

  • @Jerorawr_XD
    @Jerorawr_XD Рік тому +3

    I knew the SECOND I saw rotpriest that it would be abused in modern.

  • @blankfires7892
    @blankfires7892 Рік тому +1

    Maybe side board pact of negation as a combo protector that also counts for the storm count and cost no mana , idk just seems decent against control

  • @luijart73
    @luijart73 Рік тому +1

    Did I understand it right? If a spell targets any creature you control while controlling Venerated Rotpriest even if the spell targeting the creature is countered or the Rotpriest leaves the field before the spell would resolve it still add the poison counter to my opponent?

  • @masterchaosforge
    @masterchaosforge Рік тому +10

    I don't think storm was ever "loved" by the community. People just remember older times fondly

    • @Xandian
      @Xandian Рік тому +6

      In 2015/2016 back when I stormed off in person people would act like it was a rollercoaster ride. People who had finished their round would come over and watch me play my Jeskai Ascendancy treasure cruise storm. Nobody ever scooped because it was fun to watch someone play out storm.
      I think it’s more so that storm in person can be cool to watch because this dude is literally casting a ton of spells, but on MTGO you just kind of sit there with no interaction (as in communication with opponent/spectators).

    • @JohnFromAccounting
      @JohnFromAccounting Рік тому

      I liked Storm, but I'm glad it was never a good deck. If every match was storm,that would suck.

    • @tristanobrien2823
      @tristanobrien2823 Рік тому +1

      @@Xandian
      I’ve had the opposite experience.
      I’ve had more games than I can count on one hand where I’ll start to combo off with gifts ungiven storm, and the opponent scoops the match in a huff. God forbid you take a little longer on your lines too because your opponent has played in such a way to force you to combo off at an inopportune time.

    • @TheTexasDice
      @TheTexasDice Рік тому +3

      I would take Storm over Ragavan 100/100 times

    • @Xandian
      @Xandian Рік тому +1

      @@tristanobrien2823 I mentioned it in another comment but I think it also
      has a bit to do with Gifts Storm. Storm used to be much more fringe, interesting, and varied (blistercoil weird, pyromancers ascension, jeskai treasure cruse[which became glittering wish storm]). It was also viewed as the “if he’s doing math on turn 2 you already lost” deck so a lot of hype was around it.
      Gifts trivialized all of that. Get mana reducer out, hope he lives, gifts with 3 mana floating and you win. Gifts ungiven makes the deck 100% more consistent than any other version of storm. It still does, but there’s just so much hate that you never get to go off nowadays before you die.
      A lot of the older storm decks you can just brick out if you didn’t have kill in hand already. Gifts storm you just need gifts and enough mana and you win.

  • @MrPataraga
    @MrPataraga Рік тому

    I have been brewing this in a bant control deck where you use this as your win con later on, seems pretty fun and a lot more out of left field, with the option to just transformative sideboard back into a traditional control deck.
    Looking forward to trying it out at my LGS

  • @funforall9741
    @funforall9741 Рік тому

    Even grapeshot works as a finish here, you can yarget rot priest with every trigger even if it would die the infect trigger still happens to close out the match

  • @ulamgexe7442
    @ulamgexe7442 Рік тому +1

    So, I'm no modern expert at all, I just played couple games on xMage few years ago to try out the top meta jund deck when wrenn and six released.
    I wonder if you could make a more ordinary storm deck with the rot priest as an alternate win condition. The ground rift looks sweet and enables the turn 2 kill, but I wonder if it is just too gimmicky to be optimal, since it only works if you have the rotpriest on play and if the opponent has no interaction.
    Also, you have some green cards, so you could play some force of vigor in the side board to help vs hammer time I guess

  • @inferno1217
    @inferno1217 Рік тому +1

    I LOVE STORM I LOVE STORM WOOOO CALEB IS BACK???

  • @TheSceptileNinja
    @TheSceptileNinja Рік тому

    I lost it when the player with the t3 kill got salty over the t2 kill. your humor is amazing harry, never change

  • @lukasileci8451
    @lukasileci8451 5 місяців тому

    So basically, if oppo go to kill in resp, the triggers go on anyway right?

  • @hansoskar1911
    @hansoskar1911 Рік тому +11

    I think this deck gets worse once people realize how storm triggers work and you can actually kill the priest before the copies can target him.

    • @VoidGivenForm
      @VoidGivenForm Рік тому +1

      When casting or copying a spell, you have to target the creature first with all the copies, so when you cast grapeshot or the ground rift the storm is already on the stack, and the targets are already all selected, so the triggers of the rotpriest happen regardlesa

    • @hansoskar1911
      @hansoskar1911 Рік тому +2

      @@VoidGivenForm no. Storm is a triggered ability that actually goes on the stack and to which you can obviously respond. the copies only go on the stack when the troggered ability resolves.

  • @Niniju8970
    @Niniju8970 Рік тому +1

    I think Spellskite should be in the main. Activating it after targeting rotpriest with all of your spells is a new rotpriest trigger each time since rotpriest cares about it BECOMING the target which is why storm works in the first place. This, in my eyes, allows for more inevitability.

  • @loopyt6205
    @loopyt6205 Рік тому +1

    Is this deck strong or not? I want to try and get into modern and this seems like a fun deck so is it worth it?

    • @SpejderIdioterne
      @SpejderIdioterne Рік тому +1

      That is a difficult question to answer. The deck is extremely new, and the archetype is, therefore, unexplored. While the deck definitely has the potential to be explosive and win games out of nowhere, the configuration as shown above folds to many types of hate, which the deck might either change to be able to work around those hate pieces or it might turn out that the deck is not that strong.
      I would probably wait a week or two and see what happens to the list before ordering it :)
      (If you want to play on mtgo using a rental service, my advice is instead to go nuts and see if you like the deck)
      Edit: One extremely good part of this deck is that even if it turns out that this deck is not that strong, you will own almost all the pieces to build izzet prowess, ensuring that there is an easy path to a proven tier 2 deck

    • @tristanobrien2823
      @tristanobrien2823 Рік тому +1

      Its pretty meh, as is.
      There’s potential, but it really needs a few more revisions at least.

    • @JohnFromAccounting
      @JohnFromAccounting Рік тому +1

      No. It can get hated out very easily and has no chance at tournaments if expected.

  • @jorgdarf4695
    @jorgdarf4695 Рік тому +2

    I feel like having one pact of Negation wouldn't be too bad to have in their either just in case

  • @keisuketakahashi4124
    @keisuketakahashi4124 Рік тому +2

    bruh why was rotpriest not a legendary... it just makes no sense that you can play multiple

  • @robbiesmith9932
    @robbiesmith9932 Рік тому

    I have been fooling around with a March of Burgeoning Life/Rot Priest build, not only do you get another copy of him, it targets so you get a trigger. The only problem is it needs a copy already on the board, but I have seen some success with it.

  • @prayerman101
    @prayerman101 Рік тому

    How consistent is this deck?

  • @kennethstarkey4360
    @kennethstarkey4360 Рік тому

    I saw a list running for March of burgeoning life. For one green and discarding a green card you can search for rot priest if it’s on the battlefield already. Plus it would add to storm count

  • @prolikethat5995
    @prolikethat5995 Рік тому +1

    You can play rotpriest in standard with just protection and draw spells and win pretty easy too.

  • @chadmrrsn
    @chadmrrsn Рік тому

    This variant of storm does seem harder to counter when comboing off due to needing 2 removal pieces, but it does seem to take a hit from disruption

  • @kristofferstalsett8880
    @kristofferstalsett8880 Рік тому

    How long before rotpriest gets the hammer?

  • @bertilandersson6606
    @bertilandersson6606 Рік тому +3

    Play the pauper toxic deck! Thanks for the video

  • @tylermoore6774
    @tylermoore6774 Рік тому +1

    I've been running gather courage, single green for an instant that targets..... And it has convoke

  • @eloidasarmi6815
    @eloidasarmi6815 Рік тому

    How about savage summon\cavern of souls in the sideboard to cast priest through counters?

  • @joshrowan8498
    @joshrowan8498 Рік тому +1

    Not enough protection yet for this build but I like what you're thinking and I like where it's going

  • @Cfp-sx2vs
    @Cfp-sx2vs Рік тому +1

    I was 3-0 at FNM and my opponent and I in the final round asked me if I wanted to draw out, I said sure, usually how the last round ends.
    He was playing this deck and we played for fun. I was playing UW Affinity, I have to say that the deck felt ban worthy I played him in 4 full games and won 1 round

  • @MrMayo3434
    @MrMayo3434 Рік тому +1

    this deck is nuts! just started digging through my bulk for ground rifts XD

  • @michaelmorris4515
    @michaelmorris4515 Рік тому +1

    I'm going to take a guess and say rotpriest will be banned in standard and modern within 3 months. It's the most broken card in a long while.

  • @nytered3308
    @nytered3308 Рік тому

    Since you play dragon rage I would just add hearse and leyline of the void to the sideboard personally maybe vandle blast for ragavan and hammer decks

  • @blahblahgdp
    @blahblahgdp Рік тому +1

    Toxic in standard was a mistake

  • @bwahchannel9746
    @bwahchannel9746 Рік тому

    Is rotpriest triggering for each storm copy, and if yes then why since storm copies or copies in general aren't cast unless specifically stated like with hive mind or spark ral zarek.

    • @tristanobrien2823
      @tristanobrien2823 Рік тому +2

      Yes, and its because the card isn’t worded such that its the cast that counts, so much as it is being the target of a spell.
      Copies, even though they aren’t cast, can still target if the spell specifies to do so. So rotpriest will see X copies of a spell targeting it, and give the opponent that many counters.

    • @JMSginoclave
      @JMSginoclave Рік тому

      Cuz Rotpriest is worded like everyone who read Zada the first time thought she was worded. Alas, he does not care about cast only target, while she cares about both.

  • @kingceiri
    @kingceiri Рік тому

    i am curious on how long rotpriest will last. I have a strong feeling that this deck will get hit hard.

  • @sageopland3976
    @sageopland3976 Рік тому +3

    I hope this deck gets big enough that whirlwind denial becomes a meta sideboard pick.

    • @leftysheppey
      @leftysheppey Рік тому +1

      I can't see that. But it'd be cool tech lol. I think people would rather pack removal or more generic hate cards, like leyline of sanctity

    • @kamikirbits7708
      @kamikirbits7708 Рік тому +2

      @@leftysheppey or you know flusterstorm?

    • @leftysheppey
      @leftysheppey Рік тому

      @@kamikirbits7708 why would that help?

    • @kamikirbits7708
      @kamikirbits7708 Рік тому

      @@leftysheppey it was made to counter storm cards? But I see the problem, this deck doesn't care if they resolve but instead cares about the trigger. Seeing whirlwind made me think of countering spells so I forgot what the deck was about

  • @oldscratch2506
    @oldscratch2506 4 місяці тому

    I have the fetch lands and Rotpriests…I think I’ll build this for my local lgs

  • @thefish6235
    @thefish6235 11 місяців тому

    Such a cool video and well edited........for the one mechanic of the game i actually think hurts it, just my opinion on Infect, tho

  • @braydenputt2237
    @braydenputt2237 Рік тому

    I think this needs some sort of maindeck hexproof protection. Ideally something simple like vines of vastwood would do it, or if the deck seems to end up splashing blue for some odd free counters as protection

    • @Sa3vis
      @Sa3vis Рік тому

      Tamiyos safekeeping Ive seen used in the standard version

    • @jakx2ob
      @jakx2ob Рік тому

      @@Sa3vis vines is fun since it can mess with your opponents creatures in the mirror

    • @barongeoffrey75
      @barongeoffrey75 Рік тому

      @@jakx2ob + you can " counter " sigarda's aid ability.

  • @golDroger88
    @golDroger88 Рік тому +2

    3:39 When hammer on turn 2 is too slow kek. What a shitshow this game has become.

  • @AffordableAdorable369
    @AffordableAdorable369 Рік тому

    "Brotherhood's End" new card from Dominaria, might take care of those pesky artifacts/creatures

  • @Trip_Fontaine
    @Trip_Fontaine Рік тому +5

    Wow, it's like the old Storm deck but everything costs less to cast. I could definitely see a future where the Rotpriest is banned. Great video!

  • @avnir8966
    @avnir8966 Рік тому

    Outro song?

  • @barry_crisp
    @barry_crisp Рік тому

    Tragic ending for such an incredible list, makes sense why it would struggle in this metagame right now though...

  • @hunterjohnson8836
    @hunterjohnson8836 Рік тому

    Inspiring statuary with karns and ugins harry!

  • @Kaircic
    @Kaircic Рік тому

    The hammer time player calling you cringe is delicious irony

  • @tidalheart1163
    @tidalheart1163 Рік тому +3

    Rotpriest is my fav card printed in years. I am here for everything this card can do. Currently running it UG in Standard and loving it.

  • @Orion-wl1zf
    @Orion-wl1zf Рік тому

    You should make a deck based on Vindictive Flamestoaker and Mercurial Spelldancer

  • @roblove5470
    @roblove5470 Рік тому

    😍😍😍 I haven’t played modern in years but I love this deck and want to play again thank you 🙏🏿

  • @WigglyWoobah
    @WigglyWoobah Рік тому +2

    This deck will be like the eldritch evolution decks. It'll stumble and fall on its face most of the time. Rotpriest's real home is in a dedicated infect deck.

  • @littleoakstudio4254
    @littleoakstudio4254 Рік тому

    Dude I really hope wizards listens to your videos. They need to act on modern in march imo

  • @ryanrichard2736
    @ryanrichard2736 Рік тому +1

    Ah yes, Moder… I mean, Legacy Lite

  • @Rob_Pap
    @Rob_Pap Рік тому

    I literally got cancer watching this deck. SS Tier content my guy

  • @JonathanSerrano-xb7px
    @JonathanSerrano-xb7px Рік тому +1

    Cavern of souls

  • @frankieredd156
    @frankieredd156 Рік тому

    Guys i am slow, how does he spam so many toxic? I don’t understand whats triggering the toxic and how i can do it too

    • @MrHat.
      @MrHat. Рік тому

      Play spells that target a creature you control.

  • @NightOfCrystals
    @NightOfCrystals Рік тому +1

    I’m getting the vibe that rotpriest is going to get banned.

    • @NightOfCrystals
      @NightOfCrystals Рік тому +1

      Also modern is an incredibly powerful format now. I played in 2018-2019 and it was way slower pre-MH/early MH.

  • @gero77
    @gero77 Рік тому

    Amazing, as always! Great stuff!

  • @187btokes
    @187btokes Рік тому +1

    And I thought my turn 3 hammer double strike wins were fast

  • @dudono1744
    @dudono1744 Рік тому +3

    yugioh players wondering what's crazy about killing turn 2

  • @Nijht
    @Nijht Рік тому +1

    I hope to god the Rotpriest gets banned in Standard. If you don't have an immediate answer for it, it's pretty much game over. And god forbid they get two on the field.

  • @Rukazor
    @Rukazor Рік тому

    I know one piece of tuning I would do to make this deck better: I would ban Teferi Time Raveler

  • @linkXness
    @linkXness Рік тому +1

    Apostles Blessing would be banger in this deck! Change my mind

  • @valeckseimu3132
    @valeckseimu3132 Рік тому

    Ban sigarda Aids Is the only solution. Sturm Will never be tier but very funny . Btw i am glad Caleb is back.

  • @jedstanaland2897
    @jedstanaland2897 Рік тому

    You could also turn this deck into a wither and zero counter combo that basically makes your creatures immune to any damage that you might cause your creature so that they would survive no matter how much damage they may take and you wouldn't need to worry about adding any more colors because the enchantment that you use to make all damage into wither is hybrid red/black and the other cards are green that prevent the placement of-1/-1 counters so you would have the ability to play other cards that also have storm and cause much more damage without risking your creatures.

  • @BadDrummerCarl
    @BadDrummerCarl Рік тому +6

    The hammer player calling a new strategy cringe
    Okay bud

  • @genxlibertarian9656
    @genxlibertarian9656 Рік тому

    This deck is exploding on the meta right now in it's raw form. As it refines, its only gonna get better. Something's gonna get banned out, any predictions?

    • @jaggededge11
      @jaggededge11 Рік тому +1

      The deck hinges on a single creature as it's main form of win-con and can be interacted with quite effectively. It's inclusion in the format might cause a slight meta shift (Or at the very least sideboard tech), but nothing shown so far has made it seem ban worthy.

  • @Arttheclownfan38339
    @Arttheclownfan38339 Рік тому

    Glad I got him to sign my rifts long ago at a 5k!

  • @DiabloTommaso
    @DiabloTommaso Рік тому

    I love this storm deck. I ll put my pte back on my deck xD

  • @unixtreme
    @unixtreme Рік тому +2

    Man I knew this was going to happen... This card is pretty pushed.

    • @trenchtierstudios554
      @trenchtierstudios554 Рік тому

      Gruul Storm is just one of the variant being tested atm by people. Know a few people testing out tons of decks that are RGx. I have been brewing a Temur deck with Glistner elf and priest. I run a lot of green instants that give hexproof in my Temur brew.

  • @diegoperezsommariva2509
    @diegoperezsommariva2509 Рік тому

    I thought the copy was not considered a spell for things like this.

    • @jaggededge11
      @jaggededge11 Рік тому +1

      Copies are considered spells on the stack. What copies are not considered is "cast". Rotpriest only cares about being targeted by spells (Not spells that were cast), so that's why the interaction works. It's also the reason that you can use Spellskite to redirect a spell and it'll trigger Rotpriest (And if you have 2 Spellskite out, you can continually bounce a single spell between the two for as long as you can pay the cost).

    • @diegoperezsommariva2509
      @diegoperezsommariva2509 Рік тому

      @@jaggededge11 that clears things up. Also, double spellskite seems like pure evil.

  • @BCfightan
    @BCfightan Рік тому

    Don’t forget you can just hold priority instead of waiting for them to respond

  • @gabeb9495
    @gabeb9495 Рік тому +1

    I play infect and in my opinion, cut the claims and put another Force of vigor and 2 Vines of Vastwood.

  • @jeezuhskriste5759
    @jeezuhskriste5759 Рік тому +1

    I think this deck should be called Acid Rain.

  • @astanix
    @astanix Рік тому

    That was hilarious when first opp hit you for 10 on turn two and then you hit them for 10 back and they said cringe :D
    Your 10 was just better than theirs.

  • @SteveHarvey2
    @SteveHarvey2 Рік тому

    Do you think Wizards will ban Ragavan in the near future, or will they wait till every deck in the format is running 4 gut shots in the main?

    • @JohnFromAccounting
      @JohnFromAccounting Рік тому +1

      Ragavan is more dominant in the format than DRS ever was. Needs to get banned for format diversity.

  • @andersonhunt8617
    @andersonhunt8617 Рік тому +2

    Hammer players don’t get the right to say “cringe”

  • @ujou_vrc
    @ujou_vrc Рік тому

    Actually don't know if Nivmagus Elemental would be better in your deck than DRC

    • @hcmtnbiker
      @hcmtnbiker Рік тому

      It worked in the old elemental version of the deck that was UR.

    • @ujou_vrc
      @ujou_vrc Рік тому

      @@hcmtnbiker yea but now it’s another way to go off if DRC doesnt fit

  • @tommyrojas1571
    @tommyrojas1571 Рік тому

    The deck that will make me mtgo no cap!

  • @KVGKQuake
    @KVGKQuake Рік тому

    Venerated Rotpriest is absolutely cursed

  • @Joelthelobo
    @Joelthelobo Рік тому +2

    Maybe run naya so you cast silence?

    • @Tspang42
      @Tspang42 Рік тому

      I feel like that dilutes the deck too much

  • @josecalcedo9461
    @josecalcedo9461 Рік тому

    Can you play any deck with Tempered Steel? Thank you

  • @bomber1012
    @bomber1012 Рік тому

    i dont get the math.. how does this kills on turn 2?

    • @MrHat.
      @MrHat. Рік тому

      Need 10 poison to win. Play 10 spells by turn 2, easily done with storm and cheap/free spells.

    • @bomber1012
      @bomber1012 Рік тому

      @@MrHat. but grapeshot does not have phyrexian mana

    • @MrHat.
      @MrHat. Рік тому +1

      @@bomber1012 play it after you play free spells. That increases storm counter.

  • @ThePirataaa
    @ThePirataaa Рік тому

    Please Harry try to play UW control with minor misstep