Weld Stress Calculation - Eccentrically Loaded Weld Group Analysis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @raretapes8057
    @raretapes8057 2 роки тому +1

    Very good graphics and clear, helpful explanation. Thank you very much.

  • @landricojr.garcia6505
    @landricojr.garcia6505 Рік тому

    Very good explanation, clear and very understandable

    • @StructuralCentral
      @StructuralCentral  Рік тому

      I'm glad you found the explanation to be clear since there's a lot of steps to determining all of the weld stresses, especially when it comes to the Instantaneous Center of Rotation Method.

  • @SrilankanProud1
    @SrilankanProud1 Рік тому

    AMazing! You are the best!!! Thank you so much

  • @seryunkwak1824
    @seryunkwak1824 2 роки тому +1

    I love your channel. Please keep going

    • @StructuralCentral
      @StructuralCentral  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you so much! Many more videos are planned and are being worked on right now.

    • @seryunkwak1824
      @seryunkwak1824 2 роки тому

      @@StructuralCentral Please do some seismic load on structure!

    • @StructuralCentral
      @StructuralCentral  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the suggestion. It definitely helps to know what topics people are interested in.

  • @marcinbroslawski
    @marcinbroslawski 2 роки тому

    Very good description 👍

  • @nawaf8099
    @nawaf8099 2 роки тому

    Very helpful channel ,please keep going

  • @Xeirus
    @Xeirus Рік тому

    When using an I.C. Method, do you need to provide a weld of uniform leg size?

    • @StructuralCentral
      @StructuralCentral  Рік тому

      I don't see anything about the methodology that would preclude you from using it with welds that have different leg sizes. The formulas for Δu, Δm, and R all include "w" so you would just use the applicable fillet weld leg size there.
      I don't know if testing has ever been performed on weld groups consisting of welds with different leg sizes to confirm that the method is still applicable, though.