What Is The Apple Vision Pro?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 січ 2024
- What Is The Apple Vision Pro? Why The Apple Vision Pro Will Fail. What is the Apple Vision Pro? Why is Apple Vision Pro so expensive? What is the point of apple vision pro? Is apple vision pro better than meta quest pro?
In this apple vision pro review, we highlight the concerns and limitations of the apple vision pro device. The apple vision pro demo has highlighted some key problems that we've addressed which could lead to the apple vision pro failure.
Apple Vision Pro is here, redefining our relationship with technology. It's not just a headset; it's a spatial computer, seamlessly blending the digital and physical worlds. Imagine watching a movie where the actors appear life-size right in front of you, or collaborating on a project with colleagues from across the globe, feeling like you're all in the same room.
Apple Vision Pro achieves this magic through cutting-edge hardware and software. Two ultra-high-resolution displays deliver stunning visuals, while the R1 chip ensures lag-free performance. Advanced eye tracking and hand gestures let you interact with the world naturally, while Personalized Spatial Audio makes it sound like every whisper and bang comes from its rightful place.
But Apple Vision Pro is more than just immersive. It's personal. FaceTime calls transform into life-size holograms, and your memories come alive in 3D spatial photos and videos. You can even take a virtual walk through your favorite vacation spot, feeling the sun on your skin and the sand between your toes.
Apple Vision Pro is a glimpse into the future, where technology disappears and only the possibilities remain. It's a tool for creativity, connection, and exploration, waiting to be unleashed.
While Apple Vision Pro promises a dazzling foray into the future of mixed reality, it's not without its flaws. Here's a look at some of its limitations that temper the excitement:
1. High Price and Niche Appeal: At a hefty $3,499 price tag, the Vision Pro is far from readily accessible. This, coupled with its focus on productivity and niche apps, makes it more geared towards professionals and early adopters, not mainstream consumers.
2. Confined Play Area: Despite boasting room-scale tracking, the Vision Pro's play area is surprisingly limited to just 10ft x 10ft. This significantly curbs movement during VR experiences, hindering applications like fitness and action gaming.
3. Short Battery Life: With only two hours of unplugged usage, the Vision Pro falls short of competitors and hampers sustained use without relying on a tethered connection. Long stretches of immersion or work sessions quickly become tethered affairs.
4. Limited App Ecosystem: Apple's nascent SpatialOS platform suffers from a lack of established apps compared to more mature VR ecosystems. This dearth of content can quickly leave users wanting more to experience.
5. Isolation and Sensory Disconnect: The Vision Pro's complete sensory immersion, while impressive, can be isolating. Missing physical interactions and environmental awareness can limit its applicability for extended use in social or collaborative settings.
6. Uncertain Hardware Longevity: As a first-generation device, the Vision Pro's long-term hardware performance and potential wear and tear are unknown. Durability and potential repair costs are questions yet to be answered.
7. Ethical Concerns and Data Privacy: Apple's extensive eye-tracking and hand gesture capture raise concerns about data privacy and potential misuse. Transparent policies and user control are crucial to address these concerns.
In Conclusion:
The Apple Vision Pro undoubtedly pushes the boundaries of mixed reality, but its limitations are crucial to consider. While its potential for creative professionals and early adopters is undeniable, its high price, restricted experiences, and lingering questions about user experience and data privacy mean it's not yet ready for mass adoption. Only time will tell whether Apple can overcome these limitations and truly usher in a new era of immersive computing.
Our Favorite Laptop: amzn.to/34yVqEh 💻
Noise-Cancelling Headphones: amzn.to/3BdC17C 🎧
Studio Quality Mic: amzn.to/3gWKQK1 🎙
#apple
#visionpro
#howithappened
► FTC Legal Disclaimer - Some links found in the description box of our videos may be affiliate links, meaning we may receive a small commission on sales you make through the link. This is at no extra cost to you to use our links/codes, it's just one more way to support us and our channel! :)
At $3500 (Entry level), we think the Apple Vision Pro is crazy expensive, makes other apple products redundant and will fail. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
My RTX 4090 computer is waiting for a headset (or glasses) to maintain privacy when I want to watch *****
I’m a VR enthusiast that’s been using this technology for 7 years and I agree with this whole video. Games and metaverse apps like VRChat are amazing, but it kind of ends there. Nothing Apple is doing is a logical or practical use for the technology and we already know this from trial and error.
Great for gaming and watching sports but again, only works if you’re alone
3D TV failed as people didn't want to wear a pair of glasses. That was a lot less obtrusive than this.
True, but a VR headset gives you a massive screen that covers your whole room wherever you are and it also works outside. But yes, the downside is that you have a toaster strapped to your face and you are completely isolated
Bingo. I've been saying this everywhere as well.
People tend to follow the path of least resistance, and picking up a smart phone to check messages, flipping open a laptop to type documents and picking up a remote to watch TV is clearly much more convenient than putting on a pair of Heavy, hot ,sweaty, eye staining,, isolating goggles. not to mention the fact you are substituting infinite K reality for a vastly inferior 4K version of it, Reality will always be greater than Virtual "reality".
Everyone wants one of these, but few can afford it. The pre-owned market for these will probably be big, I imagine.
Lots of people bought them for the hype, then returned them a week later
@@HowItHappened Lots of people bought every new iPhone and returned it soon after because they followed the hype and something new came out by someone else. That didn't mean the iPhone was a product failure, however.
o wow
apple made the eye phone
I guess AVP just a cornerstone. There is no right time to publish this thing, if you want developers to take the next step. As a device itself there is no real use case. Reasonably you see people on Laptops and Smartphones on a day to day basis for so long: tools that relate to real life. This thing relates to nothing (yet) no matter how well designed it is. It doesn't solve a real problem (yet). The only reasonable use cases for this thing in my opinion is for educational purpose or learning (like deep dives into microlevels of the human body in 3D or the Universe or how stuff is build and so on) Other than that it's just a weird not at all cool device, that's just well marketed
VR headsets are great for gaming. But Apple completely ignored that market with no support for pcvr or Meta Quest games
Honestly, who knows if it's gonna be a hit or a total miss? Apple's definitely taking a leap here, kinda like when they decided to drop a phone without any buttons… everyone said they would fail like the CEO of Microsoft…
* There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share." - Steve Ballmer, former CEO of Microsoft, 2007.
* "The iPhone's impact will be minimal. It is just one of many contenders in an evolving market." - Analysts at Nokia, 2007.
* "The iPhone has no chance of becoming a serious threat to RIM's BlackBerry. Email functionality is where business users will turn, and Apple can't compete there." - Co-CEO of Research In Motion (now BlackBerry Limited), 2007.
* "It's highly unlikely that Apple will make much of an impact on the mobile market with this device." - Sony Ericsson executive, 2007.
You never get thing on hand review and you said fail 😂
That's because you have to be either a massive UA-camr like Marcus, or an iSheep UA-camr to get hold of it from Apple. This honest channel is neither.
@@dtz1000 I like the review with hands on all market already filled with product out there. This just launched few days want very less people on hands still early to judge and predict like that. To me maybe HomePod is consider fail product , Apple Card that we can see after product launched for a while, not just like create contents to what fail without any data or market to get viewers like this
You’re allowed to disagree with our opinion 😁
Oh
They’ll sell as many as they can make of this version. Supposedly 500,000 per year.
If you think apple spatial computers wont shrink in size and price over the next few years, and improve in functionality and software, you probably shouldn’t be making tech videos.
Whilst you hope it gets smaller/lighter/cheaper etc with technological advancement, Apple has a history of making their products larger and more expensive
But so does a Quest from Meta for a fraction of the price
@@HowItHappened they also have a history of making the iPhone SE, and the Apple Watch SE, and cheaper macs, and iPad minis and on and on.
Adjusted for inflation the original apple macintosh would be US$7000 today.
If you think that tech hasn’t improved and gotten cheaper over time, for what you get, you aren’t paying attention.
I do expect apple to keep charging the same amount or more for the Pro version of the Apple Vision Pro line, which will always be as high end as they can make it. But at the same time I expect them to produce a cheaper apple vision air or something. It will be the cost of, and will be an alternative to a laptop. Otherwise it could never get any kind of mass adoption.
It’s not about you wanting it now, it’s about you wanting it five years from now.
5 years from now you will want the latest version.
I don't like Apple but they have huge loyal not very smart fanbase, so i don't think this will fail like you say
Maybe you’re right, but I doubt even some of the most loyal fans will fork out $3500 for a headset
I still cannot believe they didn't make it Steam compatible. They need to change that if they dont want it to fail.
Agreed. It’s perfect for gaming
It's apple
I would have liked to see a car instead of this imo
The price of 3500$ is too low considering it is designed for only ultra rich, it could be far better if price would have been 12000$ as rich wouldn't mind any price.
The expensive ones will come out. Diamond encrusted things offered on the aftermarket.
Yes, just like the overpriced, clunky iPhone and the first Mac luggable laptop, it will fail as part of creating an entirely new Apple product line for decades to come. Totally get that most people should wait until version 2, but not developers or those who can justify V1.
The first iPhone was $499.
It's going to be a hard sell for the average person. Who has 3500 euro sitting around to spend on a product that won't be using on a daily basis? Not to mention it has a 2 hour battery life only... I used to have a quest 2, and honestly you just get tired of it after a while, it's cool for a bit, but the fun wears off pretty soon. Now a Quest 2 only cost me 300 dollars, imagine paying more than 10 times that for a device you will probably get tired of after 3 months of use.
I know apple users tend to have more money than common sense, but even for them, this product will be a fair bit too expensive to just experiment with.
I wonder if Apple stick to their pricing strategy or create a ‘cheaper version’ in the future
According to the isheep, people who edit videos for a living will buy it as it will pay for itself. I had no idea video editing was so lucrative.
It will not fail … but it is going for the years to come as a supplemental tool , not a replacement, even when it will be mature : light, discret… etc, we will need other ways to interact with computing… Experience show us that few things replace, they add possibilities, replace some usage but very seldomly they can replace everything
It will fail.
@@jesusisunstoppable4438
Amen !
I was quite perplexed by this product. Apple doesn't make a habit of releasing unfinished products. I hope it improves but it still looks 10 years off
I'm surprised the FOV on this is lower than the Quest 3.
Maybe AR/VR is still ahead of its time
The Apple vision pro is a stupid feature, it looks stupid and I rather don't think that many people will buy it since it's like $3500
Guys he just mad that he can't buy a Vision Pro. I cannot afford one neither but I want it 😢
look biased
Why? Headsets have been around for 10 years now. And now Apple releases one and everything will suddenly change? It's nothing more than a very expensive, higher quality Quest 3. That's not enough to make everyone accept it and start using it. Nothing to do with bias, just looking at the past decade of VR development.
Everything is biased.
Poor people cope.
It won't lil bro . Oil up and I'll come over to explain why you're wrong 🥨