yeah it's cause it's rigged as hell. This somg won't make a phenomenal like for example maneskin did in 2021. Plus she won already so why is she still here??
I'm 62 yrs old. I've been watching Eurovision for 50 years, since I was 12 yrs old, when ABBA won in 1974, with Waterloo. And so far, in the whole history of Eurovision, Tattoo, is THE atomic bomb 💣 song. It makes my heart soar and weep at the same time. There have been some incredible acts, but Tattoo is No.1. Some other favourites and a very close 2nd, is our own girl Dami Im, who in 2016 represented Australia for the first time with her Sound of Silence., amazing! I also love, Greece's, Helena Paparizou., My Number One. Ukraine's, Verka Serduchka, with Dancing Lasha Tumbai. And Britain's, Sam Ryder with Spaceman.🚀 Cheers, Sophie from Australia 🇦🇺 🍸🍹🍺
me2. i m nearly cry when i watch it first time with my girl Mia in Stuttgart, then i watch it again and again, such an amazing lady indeed and i adore her(him)soooo much, her way of express the power of music art just touchs my heart soooo deeply... i am speechless. i need to go Sweden, her land to discover more amazing arts. greetings from Germany / China. yomemia*mamamia...
It’s weird that 80% of all nations gave Sweden 12 points, while audience in Liverpool yelling: CHA CHA CHA Televoting: more then 300 points for Finland 👀
Loreen also got high public votes. What she presented is true music performance not a circus show like cha cha , judges voted mostly based on music, while younger people vote mostly for circus shows . It’s not surprising
Sooo..why doesn't the audience choose the Eurovision winner again? After all, we are the ones who will listen, love and support the song and the singer after it's all done, not some jury. We are the ones who vote (and PAY for those votes) and in the end our votes still don't matter because the jury decides the winner as they wish...
Because you don‘t get the lyrics. Can you tell me the story behind the lyrics of Czech Republic? Or of Croatia? The jury votes not for the performance we see, they vote for a lot of different reasons and criteria
Actually, the audience *does* vote, and it changes a lot the results. Take Finland, for example, they were second because of the public vote and got 0 points from the judges
@@drunkfood3275 And whats your point? If you want to know the meaning of the lyrics you should translate it. Are you assuming that everyone understands English?
@@drunkfood3275 actually they chose who fits best into their narrow minded little Rainbow world and see who's deemed most deserving of a prise funded by the people watching it .
if the juries are so professional and they judge by vocal performance, how comes that France's La Zarra or Portugal's Mimicat with their phenomenal vocal performances fared so bad with the juries?
@@giulia5735there wasn’t much echo unfortunately. During melfest it was much more enjoyable because we could hear the echo and it was more magical (as well as the platform she is standing because Liverpool kinda killed her staging as well)
@@emrefisal7146 ok, but the contest is not to watch a magical performance, the contest gives you a stage and without any help/effect/other voices you need to sing your song, she had an echo effect and, like i said background voices.
@@giulia5735 almost each and every artist had some prerecorded or back vocalist but she didn’t had echo effect lol. You can clearly hear the raw voice from the mic. It would be more enjoyable with echo effect lol but she didn’t have that
Let's not forget how sweden actually gave 12 points to finland on the televote, but finland gave ZERO to sweden. It just shows the character of those supporting the green man
Wow, i'm glad to see i'm not the only one disappointed with this year's results. There were definitely better songs that deserved the win, and honestly when i listen to this one i just wanna turn the volume down...
@@Kitanawinsflawlessvictory difference is BOTH juries AND people liked her. People liked Finland a bit better, and I'm sure their act will do great on Finnish Idol next year or whatever. This is not a competition simply decided by popular vote, Finland's song didn't appeal as much to juries. Them's the rules, deal with it.
When she performed this song in the Swedish "Melodifestivalen" it was way better in my opinion. But as a Swede, I might be biased but I think she deserves this win. I think it's an absolutely amazing song
I've heard that next year Abba is going to represent Sweden. Australia is going to answer with AC/DC and Germany is going to shoot with Rammstein. I mean, why not?
Rammstein would never do that. I don't know who told you this but this is definitely not true. They would never waste their time for this shitshow lol. People didn't even appreciate the talent of lord of the lost, why should Rammstein waste their time there? My country should just waste some rarely known musicians who Sound like everyone else out there.
@@thehellsraven nah, don't worry, I was just trying to point out how cheap it is to send internationally well know artists to this kind of competition. On a side note though, Germany didn't deserve the treatment they got this year.
so to those who are saying that loreen also got many points. you have a point. however the jury created such a wide gap between sweden and all other countires, that no realistic public voting could have surpassed it. if it was a normal gap ( and im not saying only finland should have been 2nd in jury voting) kaarija would have passed loreen with many points. there was a 200 points gap in jury voting, which is not both ideal or normal.
The jury exists to counterbalance votes for goof songs and 'meme'-artists. In other words, its job is to keep the competition's credibility intact by stopping artist like the saxophone guy, or Verka Serduchka, or Finland this year. Also, Loreen's song gets three times more play on Spotify than Finland's song. That's a better gague of what the people really prefer.
@@JJJ111JJJ bro if she really deserved all her jury points then why didn’t other countries like spain get so much more (cause they were just as good, if not better). and her song gets more played probably because she won the eurovision before and therefore she’s more famous? love how you made zero points there💀💀
It just seems that the costumes and stage have come to play an important part in promoting the song. Personally I thought the song was so so and similar to some song I heard before.
Yes, I have the exact feeling I heard something like this before; at some way it reminds me of Morandi -Angels, but there is something else like this. Also feel like the song is ordinary
Euphoria was masterpiece and one of the best songs on esc. Tattoo is just a good song. Definitely deserves top spots but not a win. Not in a dream and whole audience who watched the show live knew that.
There was nothing better than Tattoo though. I can understand people being upset about a previous winner, but to me nothing beat this last night. This one had me from the first few seconds.
The outrage isn't about which song is better, or if Loreen deserved to win or not, people got bitter because they loved one song, they voted for it (and let's remember, you have to pay for your vote), and in the end it didn't matter because the jury has more power to chose whatever they want. If Finland had received the 12 points from EVERY country's televote, he would have win with a difference of only 11 points. The jury made it practically impossible for anyone else but Loreen to win. What is the point of having people voting if it's gonna be like this? He was the second most voted in Eurovision's History and it meant nothing for the final results. I'd say that even if you like Tattoo better, you could understand the general feeling of injustice ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The point is to have a jury that reprimands meaningless lyrics and weak vocals. His song is suitable for the Finnish pubs, not the Eurovision stage. At least the juries appreciate that this is a singing contest
@@Justhomasd i get your point but you say pointless lyrics? The eurovision is full of songs with pintless lyrics. And if you know what Käärijä even sang you would know that the lyrics arent wven that crazy, atleast compared to some other past performances
I understand your frustration but this voting system has been going on for years, it’s not like they changed it this year to make Loreen win. There were other Eurovision winners like Jamala and Duncan Laurence that didn’t win the televote but still managed to win the contest with the help of the jury. Plus keep in mind that Loreen came 2nd in the televote which is still a very popular result, it’s not like she came at the bottom.
@@GGGaming-by9vz Exactly, Loreen’s lyrics are not something we haven’t heard before and are generic, but at least they are not about drinking, pina colada, getting wasted on the dance floor etc I mean come on
Are you dumb? If less people voted for Loreen Finland would still win. It’s a combination of jury and people. I’m happy it is. You don’t want a rich organisation to spam votes for someone they want to win for whatever reasons. And stop being bitter people. This is a true class act. It saddens me that majority of people nowadays have the mental capacity of a crack baby. Finland was fun but doesn’t even reach the knees of Loreen’s act. Be real.
50 years ago ABBA won Eurovision today. And they have been a big inspiration for many Swedish artists. Loreen was so happy when someone told her that this song reminded them about ABBA. That was a big compliment for her
@@kummingo Agreed and who cares really, if it reminds someone of ABBA (Sweden) for me thats awsome. This song is amazing in any case, cheers from Sweden!
I think she went from being one of the most popular ESC winners to being one of the least popular. She received 12 points from the public exactly 0 times (Finland 18 times). I wonder what it must have been like for her with the crowd chanting Cha cha cha.
She knows her song was streamed more than twice as much. The public votes dont mean anything. Its just a game of how clowney and quirky an act can get. That is why croatia was in there in the first place.
@@Oskyldig-ot1yr wahwah, eurovision is about creativity. cha cha cha was a perfect mix of different genres. you’ve heard something like tattoo a thousand times i bet.
@@ZettaFish I agree. Eurovision is known for it's mix of perfect talent and excelling creativity. The crowd loves a song with a crazy vibe. Acts like Cha Cha Cha is what makes Eurovision Eurovision, and not just another contest like the Voice.
I loved the part when she tried (and failed) to act happy and surprised during the jury vote. Public voting has its problems but Jurys are just a corrupt system.
As usual!!! All knew that she wuld have win........next year Sweden will celebrate the ABBA 50* anniversary!!!!besides the song was almost similar that one from the film MAMMA MIA!!!🤗🤗🤗😳😳
I agree with you. The problem is, jury votes sometimes for songs which are sung terribly. I don't think Loreen's vocals in the final was technically good even with comparison to another performers. Norway was in my opinion much better in this case and I'm not from Scandinavia 🙂
Not gonna lie, Loreen performance was absolutely beautiful and wished her high notes but I think it is totally unfair that(often biased) the jury are voting and robbing points from many artists. Look how Norway was robbed but it was one of the song with highest points given from public. And of course the winner was Finland which would be on 1st place if not jury points.
Norway Was Absolutely Robbed Of What Should Have Been A Win . Loreen Was Already Well Known So She Swooped Up All The Votes And Tried To Act Surprised!
Norway hadn't a great performance! I don't know if it was a tech issue or she lost her voice, but she wasn't at her best. She just had a lot of social media fans ! Finland was much better 🎉
I would really like to know the rules the jury votes by. Like: Are they voting on a live performance only? Has it to be the exact same one as the audience saw? How are the votes calculated? When does a country announce the jury members? I think more transparency would be a great idea overall. 😊
Loreen copied Mika Newtons song Tatoo and next year is Abba 50th celebration. Of course she had to win ! So it was corrupted. dusty old boring love songs and ballads, what else. She is also signed with warner bros who support juries in each country
Jury points should not exceed the people's given points. There is definitely something wrong if a single piece gains about double points than others and still lose!
This is exactly the point of Jury. People vote for songs like Solo o Mamma SC, Juries can valorate correctly to Spain, Estonia, Italy and other great songs that people don't valorate.
I’m not a hater, but the fact that people are so furious about the jury votes, they make petitions, leave tons of dislikes and negative comments that gain most attention even under this video (the winner’s video!) shows that something went wrong… I mean, there always were people disappointed in someone’s victory, but this year the negative feedback is mind blowing. Note that it targets the juries, not Loreen herself as she’s still a talented artist. ESC, you better do something about the voting system.
Amen. Mods try to delete critical comments on this video (mine was deleted, no bashing there or anything which would break rules of internet etiquette). Makes it seem like people are cheering the winner but the dislike ratio and the negative mood all on social media platforms and on newspapers don't lie.
She is really popular by people outside this community. This song is currently the 46th most played song in WORLD on Spotify. She is charting in many countries. Among the countries that voted for cha cha TATTOO is charting much better than Käärijä
@@bilaakis how is it related to the contest? People may listen to her song billions of times, she may be the most popular artist out there, I’m fine with that, but ESC voters gave her SECOND place IN THE CONTEST. With a 130 points margin from the public winner. That’s it.
@@olenaolena9073Why on earth are you making such a big deal out of this? The winner has many many times before not won the televote, this is not unique. The rules are 50% jury 50% public, if you don’t accept the rules then don’t participate. Simple as that.
Jury owns us an explanation. The jury criteria were updated this year to have bigger emphasis on "originality" and "overall impression" instead of just vocals. But I feel juries only voted based on the vocal capabilities. I'm not against jury votes. But jury votes should be less impactful than public votes. Jury members should also be a better representation of various musical backgrounds to better represent all of us. Now it feels they are all same anonymous gatekeepers. In addition jury gives scores based on 4 criteria They need to score these criteria separately and transparently so we can see how the final jury scores by country were formed. How on earth did Käärijä not score great jury scores as originality, performance and overall impression are the 3 criteria, not just "vocal capability"? I got the impression that jury had decided the winner already before the competition started.
Sweden performed well, but I don't see the point of sending the same participant (especially one who has already won) for a second time. In addition, the jury on purpose dragged down countries they knew people would vote for, such as Finland, Ukraine, and Norway. And they elevated Loreen so high that even with over 350 votes from the audience, Finland couldn't catch up.
@@oemusikstop with that. Sweden's song was mediocre at best and in no way was twice as better as the second one. But according to Jury Mika New... Loreen's tattoo was twice as good as anything else
I don't know why this performance got so many jury points. It was not better than at least 5 other performances this evening that got not even a third of the points. After the jury voting the competition was basically over.
The jury vote is corrupt, they decided who would win beforehand. In the beginning the Finnish narrator kept on reminding viewers that a solo woman singer has only ever won eurovision twice, which was obviously hinting towards who would win... and a returner (+ not in a bad way, ethnic Moroccan, which by winning would make eurovision "more inclusive")
How is it possible that the jury that doesnt consist of more than 500 people has 49% of the voting power compared to the millions of public voters. Honestly we can only hope that this system changes in the future. Either way Im happy that Käärija is getting the recognition though. He is first on the Spotify Global Viral Chart while Loreen is on the 29th. I think that says a lot
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣 This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA. This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
Okay I will say this here. Is Loreen an Eurovision legend? Yes. Did I like euphoria? Yes. Did I like the message of tattoo, the staging and performance? Yes, it was amazing. Did I want her to win? NO. Why? Because by sending Loreen to Eurovision there was no room for other artists to win. Too predictable. I said it in the beginning when I saw she will represent Sweden and my opinion hasn’t change. Anyway, i guess congrats Sweden! Two years in a row the winners were predictable. Let’s see next year, third time is a charm. 😬 Edit: I didn’t say it was a bad song. It was a *great* song + who *she* is, made her victory almost impossible for the others to beat. Which is unfair. Tell me why countries like portugal, armenia and norway with great vocals were completely forgotten by the juries but they all voted for sweden? Plus, I wouldn’t have said anything about her win if she won the public vote as well. But she didn’t win the public vote, the jury gave her an unbeaten result. So yeah, as said, unfair.
My thoughts exactly! I'm not mad because Sweden won or because my beloved Finland didn't. I'm disappointed because it feels like the winner was decided already in March. I feel like the others never had a real chance.
agreed. Euphoria was a great hit, but Tattoo just felt like a bleak copy of Euphoria, i didn't think she deserved to win and I'm Swedish. I was rooting for Germany all the time lol
What message? Tattoo is the most generic radio song in a while. Angles crying violins playing lol! Also the melody is stolen from several songs. Sweden only won to get an ABBA show for next year (ps. One song that was copied to tattoo is abba winner takes it all)
She won bc of jury votes, finland got more public votes. Jury votes shouldnt affect that much bc how can anyone else win after she received over 300 jury votes.
@@fuserproducer it might be reaching but I have never heard of any other artist than finnlands... and thats because of a viral tiktok... I'm sure there were lots of ppl that called for finnland because the tiktok was funny
Loreen it’s not the problem, the juries are and the song contest in general. I am still convinced that the Swedish delegation really planned this out for the 50th anniversary of ABBA. In order to win, this song was created. They chose Loreen, as she is famous and everyone knows that she’s a power-weapon. Tattoo won Melodiefestival because of her. The same happened yesterday. Everyone knew that the song will do good in front of the juries and public
@@bigd_selectersmg the coincidences are just too big, its not about "getting over it", it just seems too suspicious and scripted somewhat but nobody can prove it
if the jurys wont exist, it would be easier for anyone to win esc, as the pepole will be voting and its more interessting and more exciting if it exists.
Is anyone really surprised that a well crafted artistic song and performance had gotten a significantly better jury result than a gimmick fun song that all you remember from is screaming cha cha cha repeatedly?
I really hope for next year’s Eurovision that we don’t have favouritisms towards anyone months before the Eurovision day. Because last year we already knew Ukraine was winning, the same this year but with Sweden. It makes the contest so boring
Well then people should stop monitoring the contest months before the actual show. I guess that is the problem, plus the obsession of eurofans with the bookies
@@justafella_ yea i like reaaaally love Eurovision but i don't listen to any of the songs and I don't even know the artists until the 1st semifinal so that it's a more enjoyable and unique experience
There’s always been favouritism in Eurovision, I doubt that can change unless they introduce anonymity of countries the songs represent - that would be very interesting if they did that though!
I liked Loreens 2012 song BUT i cant be the only one who would want someone else to win than her. Also i think the juries votes should be 1/3 of all votes because who da hell even cares really is it best singing technique in the world.
I agree with the comparison; I didn't think song stood out from yesterday's line up, not in the way her first winner did that year.... I think the idea of rebalancing the Jury vote to be slightly less important isn't a bas one; maybe a 2/5 3/5 But then I'd like to see the results announced togetehr... Right now, all the Jury votes... then the phone votes In One Go.. doesn't work for me Its like watching the first half of a match.. then going off for lunch and just checking back for the final score
@@micheledipietro9223 IT's a SONG contest and this song is anything but original. It's a generic love song and such a Eurovision clichè entry. And the same artist already won with an almost identical song 11 years ago. The juries don't value creativity.
@@micheledipietro9223 Not really, for years now Eurovision has been all about the Show off, that's why you see such big stage productions. They barely care if the song is actually good, as long as the presence is strong
While Loreen is a very good artist with a very good song... as a swede I must admit it is a joke that 200 jury members decide the outcome of this so called contest. It is not the first time, but I hope it was the last. Finland and Käärijä was hands down the true winner. Eurovision better change the voting system going forward. Let each country representative present their tele-votes instead of a so called "jury" vote.
I think it's so friggin boring with Eurovision these days. Was better back in the day when people actually had some national connection to their country.
Loreen is an incredibly talented singer and performer. This is an okay song. It's not that she didn't perform well; I would say just vocally, her singing was likely superior to Käärijä's last night. But this jury vote was bizarrely skewed: if it was solely about vocal skill, how on earth were exceptional performances such as Spain, France, and Portugal voted so low? Based on what I can see online, the jury seems to be made up almost entirely of former Eurovision people (my comment doesn't post when I put a link here, but Google it!). I feel like maybe this played a role in the ridiculous amount of jury points Loreen got as someone who is already an absolute Eurovision icon; ideally, her points should have been better divided between herself, La Zarra, Mimicat, Paloma, etc. Secondly and more importantly, it is SO OBVIOUS to everyone that Finland was the desired winner. Yes, people love Loreen, 243 points through televoting is a lot. But the stadium audience really reflected how many many people felt last night: so many viewers were hoping and waiting for Käärijä to win and end the night by screaming Cha Cha Cha along with him during his encore. It was a unique, original, upbeat song, while Tattoo was just another bland entry. If literally anyone else besides Loreen had been performing it, I'm not even sure it would have qualified beyond the semis. So, in conclusion, congratulations to Loreen, but her victory feels frustrating. Now I can no longer remember her as "the queen of Eurovision who sings Euphoria " but "the unnecessarily returning champion who won over a song more people wanted to see win".
*Everybody’ s talking about the juries ahah. I have a feeling of déjà vu. Well… At least now you know how it feels! That’s why the TRUE WINNER OF ESC 2016 is Sergey Lazarev who won the televote but was dragged down by the juries.* *GREETINGS FROM* 🇷🇺🪆
To be honest I think she felt the same way, she didn't seem particularly happy with winning, she seemed to be in disbelief, but not really in a good and celebratory way at literally any point after she won. Look at her vs. Käärijä before she won, and Måneskin after winning. She just didn't seem comfortable at any point.
Is hurts in my throat when i listen to this song because her voice is so powerful, i just dont know how she does it! All in all really impressive the other songs were amazing this year too
The berber people livs 3000 m above the see since 25 000 years (some say) They can dance and sing. Problems solved through the evolution. Their airways, including the nose have made it possible because of evolution. Loreen sings in another way than europeans. Her voice is a bit nasal and very strong because of her background.
She's been expected to win Eurovision since even before she won the Swedish competition. That's a lot of pressure. And she seems like a sensitive person. Probably just tired.
I'm a huge fan of her! Greetings from Greece!! ❤❤️ I have ALL of her songs in my collection. Every time I listen to them, I always feel goosebumps all over my body! She's so romantic, so emotional. Absolutely historical and incredible! I love her voice, her style and everything. I hope she'll never quit singing and one day, she'll reach and even overcome the number of 100 released songs!! Her voice is angelic!! And I also hope the number of views on her music videos will get so much higher!! She's a superstar! Best Eurovision contestant ever. Long live Loreen!! And if she ever comes to Greece for a concert, I'll buy a ticket immediately! There's no way I'm gonna miss that historical event. If it ever happens. Thank you!! ❤❤️
I thought Tattoo was a pretty average song in comparison to her previous Euphoria. I quietly sat listening to her song. Whereas with Finland's Cha Cha Cha my whole family was up dancing and singing to their song. It was so much fun. That being said, I do think Loreen is a great singer and performer.
She is my best singer of all times. I’m in LOVE with this woman ❤️! I’m supporting her since 2011 when I discovered My Heart is Refusing Me as kid at Melodifestivalen and I knew that she will become a big star one year and now I’m 23 and she is winner of two ESCs❤️. I’m beyond proud 😢❤❤❤
It's completely unfair that a song completely predictable and identical to the style of euphoria won .Finland was different and a new artist deserved to win .Plus he actually won the televote with a high difference.
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣 This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA. This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
Let's be honest: i love Loreen, i was obsessed with Euphoria even years after it won, Loreen is hard-working, creative and talented - I'm not denying any of that. I just think that there were way better or catchy songs that could have won. Unfortunately it's a shame this win kinda takes a shade over her and the mark she left on Eurovision in 2012. Anyways, good luck to her i guess.
My thoughts as well. She's a great artist and I'm happy for her but the song is kind of... Eh. It's alright. It's decent. But there were some really creative songs from other countries that stood out way more. Sweden keeps sending the most boring songs ever and this is just gonna reinforce that lmfao
@@Thysillia Yeah, Melodifestivalen would have had to change, now pop music will be produced like never before in Melfest and it will have the same writers. I guess we're not gonna see a swedish song or metal for some time.
@@MM-of1vf they are all mostly plagiarism. Cha cha cha is really close to electric callboys song too. Tho i think Sweden didn't deserve so many jury points
@@claudiuprichici4028 Look at the tell me they didnt want her to win ? :P Was her song twice as good as Israels ? :P Cause she got twice as much points from the jury as second one. They wanted her to win cause they knew, 50 year Abba then in Sweden, this means printing $$$$.
Loreen is a good artist. They have lots of talent in Sweden! But I still feel that this song was not as amazing as it was made to look dy judges. It was too similar with some other songs... and jury votes were making impossible gap at the start. It felt like she won because she won with an amazing song long time ago. It really gave me mixed feelings. Not hating for the artist, but bad feeling because of the system.
Groupies be votin’ based on her last performance… it’s not fair to the other contestants… they should not be allowed to compete more than once since their fan base will definitely cast their vote in their direction…. What’s next? Seeing a 26 eurovision winners competetion?! Not to mention the song is plagiarized (abba - the winner takes it all)
Telewotiing is so bad Finand try to cheat by giving Sweden lowe points and Israel non.They knew Sweden was going to win but gave the best oponents low points.Shame on Finland and the and ugly finnish people
Totally agree, 2 times bigger points than 2nd place by judges voting, it's like no other great contestans there... And, ye, definitely Loreen was a top contender in the final.
If past winners want to come back .. we should have one whole Eurovision dedicated to just past winners performing against each other. Make it fair. Someone who has won and has a huge music career needs to give someone else a go. On the plus side, hopefully we get Mans and Petra hosting again !!
Next year ABBA celebrates 50 years of having been in Eurovision, very useful to celebrate it in Sweden. 🧐 Thank you Jury for deciding the winner this year.
Isn't Eurovisions motto "United by music" though? Sounds a bit silly that a competition is supposed to unite the people, but then 4-5 "professionals" in each country can decide the entire competition. Especially considering how much EBU pushes the social aspect of the spectacle. Still, can't say the wrong song won with the fact you brought up as it's a pretty cool opportunity next year.
I am just so confused, congratulations Sweden but how did they win? Idk i think Austria, France or Finland should have won their performance was more exiting and i could actually hear the lyrics but anyways congratulations to Sweden.
Well she does have over 50mil streams which is the highest of this esc season. Idk why so many people are acting suprised and hating on her. People are hating on her just because finland didn't win. If finland sent a bad song everybody would have loved her win.
@@rinojuric4836 that’s the exact reason no one wanted her to win. It’s a generic pop song, she’s already a well known artist, what in the world is she doing in esc?
@@rinojuric4836 ppl are not mad bc finland didn't win. they're mad bc loreen already won and her coming back took the fun out of the competition. i personally would have been happy for any other country winning, but loreen's song was just so mediocre and predictable and it would not have won so easily if it wasn't loreen singing it.
@@rinojuric4836yes but the people wanted finland with a enormous majority. the jury could not possibly be so out of touch with what people actually want. undeserved win maybe bought.
If her team had promoted her in the USA, not only would Tattoo have been a hit there, it would surely have been nominated for Best pop vocal performance at the Grammys! Loreen has to debut in US, She deserves to win a Grammy!
Her team didn't promote her in the US because her team knew she had to win votes from Europeans to win Eurovision. Ultimately though I think Loreen is content being the official queen of Europe
The staging the winning to sweden was so obvious. First of all, next year is the ABBA's 50th anniversary year. Loreen didn't make this song but all the same crew who did the 2012's song Euphoria. In this Tattoo song, there are several parts of which you can definitely hear they're plagiarized. Google Mika Newton for example. Melodies are exactly like that, also some parts of the song "flying free". Also people voted for Käärijä. The only way Sweden got to won was by the jury, and next year's parties definitely wanted to be in Sweden. This is sooo obvious. So Finland was robbed, and Käärijä is the real winner of the show. That's what people wanted.
True, the number of 12 she got from the juries was ridiculous. It’s clear they were pushing her win hard. She was good but NOT THAT good, others had even better vocals, songs, staging. There were lots to choose from and you’re somehow telling me all chose Sweden. Rigged
@@silvermist_fairy Absolutely. There were a lot of beautiful songs and performances, Loreen's performance (all credit to the win) was so could we say dull. Too artistic, so that all the feelings showing looked kinda fake. I liked a lot of Cyprus, Norway and Estonian shows.
390 Million streams total on Spotify. Gold in The UK Gold in Denmark Gold in Italy Gold in Switzerland Gold in Spain Platinum in Portugal Platinum in Belgium Platinum in Greece 3 Platinum in Poland Diamond in France
@@ullakeskinen8895 thats the only video tho. Tattoo Audio has 45 M views on yt. The lyrical has 66 M views. The Music video has 11 M views . 🤭 keep viewing that video. Its uploaded on the Eurovision channel. He wont get any coins for those views.
THIS is beyond powerful !!! The way she pushed the roof up against all the pain to find love, true love for yourself. I could only cry, it's so beautiful and she is incredible. It made me feel all my own hidden pain I thought I processed, but we are never done, it's a constant battle and fight for freedom.
Maneskin managed to make a name for themselves outside of Eurovision, they have no need to return. Loreen on the other hand…might be seeing her again in 10 years
![All Winners of Eurovision Song Contest [1956-2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V5bu_lZMb8E/mqdefault.jpg)
I think they should do a eurovision where all the winners from previous once face off in the ”ultimate” eurovision
What a show it would be
YES!!! :D
Eurovision Hunger Games 😂
I like the idea!!!
Eurovision All Stars
Who is here after Eurovision 2024
+
I am😁
meee
Mee! Its just that tattoo was such a good performance and I miss 2023 eurovision
❤🎉
I think it's the first time I am reading so many negative comments about a winning song ❗
There is a reason for that... Simple! Same song like Mika Ñewton - В плену. Actually...
@@icemynth1094And the Winner takes it all..... Copy paste:/
yeah it's cause it's rigged as hell. This somg won't make a phenomenal like for example maneskin did in 2021. Plus she won already so why is she still here??
@@anastasiam.3029 Next year taking that song from ABBA and suprise... again win. Mahtavaaaaaaa!
because cha cha fans are salty asf right now lmao😂😂
I'm 62 yrs old. I've been watching Eurovision for 50 years, since I was 12 yrs old, when ABBA won in 1974, with Waterloo. And so far, in the whole history of Eurovision, Tattoo, is THE atomic bomb 💣 song. It makes my heart soar and weep at the same time. There have been some incredible acts, but Tattoo is No.1. Some other favourites and a very close 2nd, is our own girl Dami Im, who in 2016 represented Australia for the first time with her Sound of Silence., amazing! I also love, Greece's, Helena Paparizou., My Number One. Ukraine's, Verka Serduchka, with Dancing Lasha Tumbai. And Britain's, Sam Ryder with Spaceman.🚀 Cheers, Sophie from Australia 🇦🇺 🍸🍹🍺
За Верка Сердечка лайк!😀👍
kesinlikle bundan daha iyisi yok. muhteşem bir müzik abidesi.
me2. i m nearly cry when i watch it first time with my girl Mia in Stuttgart, then i watch it again and again, such an amazing lady indeed and i adore her(him)soooo much, her way of express the power of music art just touchs my heart soooo deeply... i am speechless. i need to go Sweden, her land to discover more amazing arts. greetings from Germany / China. yomemia*mamamia...
@@zenobiapalmyra5670 Rise Like a Phoenix sung by Conchita Wurst is soooo good
@@zenobiapalmyra5670 я с вам согласен,Привет из Казахстана,песня просто супер,а голос вау
It’s weird that 80% of all nations gave Sweden 12 points, while audience in Liverpool yelling: CHA CHA CHA
Televoting: more then 300 points for Finland 👀
Comments are being removed as well.
Loreen also got high public votes. What she presented is true music performance not a circus show like cha cha , judges voted mostly based on music, while younger people vote mostly for circus shows . It’s not surprising
@Anfield Road ur in minority nword
Well, jury voting is also a thing in this competition and have always been
@@Volvith 😂😂😂😂😂
Sooo..why doesn't the audience choose the Eurovision winner again? After all, we are the ones who will listen, love and support the song and the singer after it's all done, not some jury. We are the ones who vote (and PAY for those votes) and in the end our votes still don't matter because the jury decides the winner as they wish...
Because you don‘t get the lyrics. Can you tell me the story behind the lyrics of Czech Republic? Or of Croatia? The jury votes not for the performance we see, they vote for a lot of different reasons and criteria
Actually, the audience *does* vote, and it changes a lot the results. Take Finland, for example, they were second because of the public vote and got 0 points from the judges
@@drunkfood3275 And whats your point? If you want to know the meaning of the lyrics you should translate it. Are you assuming that everyone understands English?
@@drunkfood3275 actually they chose who fits best into their narrow minded little Rainbow world and see who's deemed most deserving of a prise funded by the people watching it .
Ukraine won last year due to the peoples' sympathy votes, dunno how you say the audience has no impact ever
if the juries are so professional and they judge by vocal performance, how comes that France's La Zarra or Portugal's Mimicat with their phenomenal vocal performances fared so bad with the juries?
Because the songs are mid
i think the jury votes a day before the esc final.
juries have stockholm syndrome
question of the day
@@NateEMG and Tattoo, as a generic mass-produced Euphoria 2.5 isn't?
They gave her just a box, a microphone and lot of sand and she set up an illusion in the desert. Truly professional.
*and an echo effect, background voices, smoke and special effects
SAAAAND, SAAAAAAND! I can feel you slipping through my hands
@@giulia5735there wasn’t much echo unfortunately. During melfest it was much more enjoyable because we could hear the echo and it was more magical (as well as the platform she is standing because Liverpool kinda killed her staging as well)
@@emrefisal7146 ok, but the contest is not to watch a magical performance, the contest gives you a stage and without any help/effect/other voices you need to sing your song, she had an echo effect and, like i said background voices.
@@giulia5735 almost each and every artist had some prerecorded or back vocalist but she didn’t had echo effect lol. You can clearly hear the raw voice from the mic. It would be more enjoyable with echo effect lol but she didn’t have that
It was cute when she thanked the public while she should be thanking the juries
Not a single, solitary 12 from the televote. 😂
@@vveles because all of them went to Finland lol, Sweden had the second highest televote so it wasn't all juries
@@felixgissemusic8767 I'm proud of my country for giving him 12 in televote, without any geographic, linguistic, cultural, or diasporic ties. ❤
@@felixgissemusic8767 But that makes it all juries considering shed be second without it
Let's not forget how sweden actually gave 12 points to finland on the televote, but finland gave ZERO to sweden. It just shows the character of those supporting the green man
Wow, i'm glad to see i'm not the only one disappointed with this year's results. There were definitely better songs that deserved the win, and honestly when i listen to this one i just wanna turn the volume down...
yeahh for some reason people liked her
@@Kitanawinsflawlessvictory difference is BOTH juries AND people liked her. People liked Finland a bit better, and I'm sure their act will do great on Finnish Idol next year or whatever.
This is not a competition simply decided by popular vote, Finland's song didn't appeal as much to juries. Them's the rules, deal with it.
@@Kitanawinsflawlessvictory cos people have different tastes to you
When she performed this song in the Swedish "Melodifestivalen"
it was way better in my opinion. But as a Swede, I might be biased but I think she deserves this win. I think it's an absolutely amazing song
Finland, Moldova, Australia, Israel
I've heard that next year Abba is going to represent Sweden. Australia is going to answer with AC/DC and Germany is going to shoot with Rammstein. I mean, why not?
Not gonna lie. That would be lit. I'd also add Adele and Eros Ramazotti into the mix. Gotta have the power ballads as well.
Germany would still get 0 points, out of principle alone...
Rammstein would never do that. I don't know who told you this but this is definitely not true. They would never waste their time for this shitshow lol. People didn't even appreciate the talent of lord of the lost, why should Rammstein waste their time there? My country should just waste some rarely known musicians who Sound like everyone else out there.
@@thehellsraven r/wooooosh
@@thehellsraven nah, don't worry, I was just trying to point out how cheap it is to send internationally well know artists to this kind of competition. On a side note though, Germany didn't deserve the treatment they got this year.
Bu kadın karşısında Eurovision 'un hiç şansı yok. Tek kelimeyle muhteşem. 😱
Aslında burdaki performansı kötü, vokalleri yıpranmış. En iyi canlı performansı Melodidestivalende seçimlere katıldığı ilk performans
МАМОЧКИ 💥💥🔥🤯🤯😳😳🤭😂😂🤭😂🫣🫣🫣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
so to those who are saying that loreen also got many points. you have a point. however the jury created such a wide gap between sweden and all other countires, that no realistic public voting could have surpassed it. if it was a normal gap ( and im not saying only finland should have been 2nd in jury voting) kaarija would have passed loreen with many points. there was a 200 points gap in jury voting, which is not both ideal or normal.
Yup you’re right. Loreen was great but Käärijä was something else
The jury exists to counterbalance votes for goof songs and 'meme'-artists. In other words, its job is to keep the competition's credibility intact by stopping artist like the saxophone guy, or Verka Serduchka, or Finland this year.
Also, Loreen's song gets three times more play on Spotify than Finland's song. That's a better gague of what the people really prefer.
I see your point, but the problem is that only public votes would be crazy, just look at what happened to Georgia this year
Keep crying
@@JJJ111JJJ bro if she really deserved all her jury points then why didn’t other countries like spain get so much more (cause they were just as good, if not better). and her song gets more played probably because she won the eurovision before and therefore she’s more famous? love how you made zero points there💀💀
Its crazy that Loreen sounds so much better live than in the studio version. Not many artists can do that.
Yea, she also such a good performer, But only her, Brunette, Alika, Blanca Paloma and La Zarra sounded better than studio
Many artists can do that.
@michaelisno4892 can you describe the sound of “ass”?
@michaelisno4892 You know Käärijä is a man right? I think you mistakenly said she instead of he.
@@RosieKitty-jb4ze La Zarra? She was so weak live thats why she didnt end in the top 10.
It just seems that the costumes and stage have come to play an important part in promoting the song. Personally I thought the song was so so and similar to some song I heard before.
Yes, I have the exact feeling I heard something like this before; at some way it reminds me of Morandi -Angels, but there is something else like this. Also feel like the song is ordinary
@@alishaavr4598 so true. :)
some bits sound like The winner takes it all, especially at the beginning
Agree with you ABBA song!!
ABBA SONGS RETURNED AT THE ESC 2023.😳👏😬👏😬👏😬👏😬👏😬👏
Viendolo en retrospectiva... Perdura y no cabe duda que es legendaria.
We have "Euphoria" at home
Euphoria 2.0 baby
@@lioncvet21 Yes, and I loved it
i prefer Tatoo
We would be so lucky🤩
@@Wooplot I prefer none. I mean she already won, what was she doing there? Unfair towards artists who came the 1st time/never won.
Euphoria was masterpiece and one of the best songs on esc. Tattoo is just a good song. Definitely deserves top spots but not a win. Not in a dream and whole audience who watched the show live knew that.
There was nothing better than Tattoo though. I can understand people being upset about a previous winner, but to me nothing beat this last night. This one had me from the first few seconds.
@@layla-dv2kt exactly this feelt like a genuine good song with good vocals everyone else feelt like clowns on the stage with bad vocals
I have no idea how can someone call it a fair win when she didnt receive 12 pts from any country voting. No-one gave her 12 pts and she won. Pathetic
@@flyingdutchman9424 Italy's act was far away from a clown. Beautiful song with best vocal performance of the night. IMO the real winner!!
These songs sound very the same in structure.
The outrage isn't about which song is better, or if Loreen deserved to win or not, people got bitter because they loved one song, they voted for it (and let's remember, you have to pay for your vote), and in the end it didn't matter because the jury has more power to chose whatever they want.
If Finland had received the 12 points from EVERY country's televote, he would have win with a difference of only 11 points. The jury made it practically impossible for anyone else but Loreen to win. What is the point of having people voting if it's gonna be like this? He was the second most voted in Eurovision's History and it meant nothing for the final results.
I'd say that even if you like Tattoo better, you could understand the general feeling of injustice ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The point is to have a jury that reprimands meaningless lyrics and weak vocals. His song is suitable for the Finnish pubs, not the Eurovision stage. At least the juries appreciate that this is a singing contest
@@Justhomasd i get your point but you say pointless lyrics? The eurovision is full of songs with pintless lyrics. And if you know what Käärijä even sang you would know that the lyrics arent wven that crazy, atleast compared to some other past performances
I understand your frustration but this voting system has been going on for years, it’s not like they changed it this year to make Loreen win. There were other Eurovision winners like Jamala and Duncan Laurence that didn’t win the televote but still managed to win the contest with the help of the jury. Plus keep in mind that Loreen came 2nd in the televote which is still a very popular result, it’s not like she came at the bottom.
@@GGGaming-by9vz Exactly, Loreen’s lyrics are not something we haven’t heard before and are generic, but at least they are not about drinking, pina colada, getting wasted on the dance floor etc I mean come on
Are you dumb? If less people voted for Loreen Finland would still win. It’s a combination of jury and people. I’m happy it is. You don’t want a rich organisation to spam votes for someone they want to win for whatever reasons.
And stop being bitter people. This is a true class act. It saddens me that majority of people nowadays have the mental capacity of a crack baby. Finland was fun but doesn’t even reach the knees of Loreen’s act. Be real.
50 years ago ABBA won Eurovision today.
And they have been a big inspiration for many Swedish artists.
Loreen was so happy when someone told her that this song reminded them about ABBA. That was a big compliment for her
This song does NOT sound like ABBA
I agree with you. For me this is not ABBA. But maybe people that’s not so familiar with ABBA think so
@@kummingo Agreed and who cares really, if it reminds someone of ABBA (Sweden) for me thats awsome. This song is amazing in any case, cheers from Sweden!
@@Brln4087it sounds like the winner takes it all from ABBA, at least the melody she sings at some points
@@rosamittermeier5214I mean only the beginning. That's where the similiarities end.
I suggest ABBA enters Eurovision again next year, and Celine Dion, the year after!
Yes🥳
It's a great compliment for Loreen if you compare her to ABBA and Celine Dion. Thanks :)
Celine can't sing anymore 😢
They can if they want to
@@violinsplaying Why would you get recognition for Loreens behalf? :D
I think she went from being one of the most popular ESC winners to being one of the least popular. She received 12 points from the public exactly 0 times (Finland 18 times). I wonder what it must have been like for her with the crowd chanting Cha cha cha.
Finland looked like a clown show and the song was horrible. It's a SONG contest not a clown act. Loreen was much better and deserved the win
She knows her song was streamed more than twice as much. The public votes dont mean anything. Its just a game of how clowney and quirky an act can get. That is why croatia was in there in the first place.
@Oskyldig And yet it received the second highest televote of all time
@@Oskyldig-ot1yr wahwah, eurovision is about creativity. cha cha cha was a perfect mix of different genres. you’ve heard something like tattoo a thousand times i bet.
@@ZettaFish I agree. Eurovision is known for it's mix of perfect talent and excelling creativity. The crowd loves a song with a crazy vibe. Acts like Cha Cha Cha is what makes Eurovision Eurovision, and not just another contest like the Voice.
I loved the part when she tried (and failed) to act happy and surprised during the jury vote.
Public voting has its problems but Jurys are just a corrupt system.
As usual!!! All knew that she wuld have win........next year Sweden will celebrate the ABBA 50* anniversary!!!!besides the song was almost similar that one from the film MAMMA MIA!!!🤗🤗🤗😳😳
And televote doesn't care about the songthey only care about entertainment. 😒
Bravo..Good point..👍
I agree with you. The problem is, jury votes sometimes for songs which are sung terribly. I don't think Loreen's vocals in the final was technically good even with comparison to another performers. Norway was in my opinion much better in this case and I'm not from Scandinavia 🙂
@@rybarybitwa so Finnlands vocals are way beyond good. He has vocals like Celine dion? You kidding?
Its been almost a year and I'm still mentally here
И я…..
so real 😭😭
I was there ❤
not me
@@randomdude8852blud is still here ☠️
that's simply unfair, the point gap was too huge for jury voting
United by Music,
Divided by Jury.
++++++
It was just boring when you knew that Sweden is getting 12 points because they didn't give anything lower.
RIGGED ??? I think that is likely !
@@arteriuszyt1672 she has best song ,best voice ,best performance !!! she deserve to win !!
Not gonna lie, Loreen performance was absolutely beautiful and wished her high notes but I think it is totally unfair that(often biased) the jury are voting and robbing points from many artists. Look how Norway was robbed but it was one of the song with highest points given from public.
And of course the winner was Finland which would be on 1st place if not jury points.
Norway Was Absolutely Robbed Of What Should Have Been A Win . Loreen Was Already Well Known So She Swooped Up All The Votes And Tried To Act Surprised!
Norway hadn't a great performance! I don't know if it was a tech issue or she lost her voice, but she wasn't at her best. She just had a lot of social media fans !
Finland was much better 🎉
Abba won Eurovision again!
And when you consider, that even tho juries gave a highly biased 190 point advantage, Sweden only won with 57 points against Finland.
If Finland won, you wouldn’t say that
I would really like to know the rules the jury votes by. Like: Are they voting on a live performance only? Has it to be the exact same one as the audience saw? How are the votes calculated? When does a country announce the jury members? I think more transparency would be a great idea overall. 😊
They’re voting based on the live performance of the jury show, which is the night before the real final
They are voting by which country wants to celebrate the 50 years anniversary of abba's win in 1974 ;)
@@weko6273wrong. They had a show yesterday for the jury and then they voted.
Loreen copied Mika Newtons song Tatoo and next year is Abba 50th celebration. Of course she had to win ! So it was corrupted.
dusty old boring love songs and ballads, what else.
She is also signed with warner bros who support juries in each country
@@RoxyCherryRozy Make sure to pull up käärijä’s pants when you’re done homie.
Even if this is not as good as Mello.. She still destroys every competition.
Jury points should not exceed the people's given points. There is definitely something wrong if a single piece gains about double points than others and still lose!
True, they were not fair😊😊😊
Who want to win,in eurovision must be lgbt (lesbo gey trans)
Why? The juries come from 36 countries, not from 1. If most of them give their votes for one singer, it means she's really good.
This is exactly the point of Jury. People vote for songs like Solo o Mamma SC, Juries can valorate correctly to Spain, Estonia, Italy and other great songs that people don't valorate.
Drinking koskenkorva? Get over it and go to sleep!
How convenient that the ESC will take place in Sweden next year; for some reason 2024 will also be the 50th anniversary of ABBA - what a coincidence!
Yeah… that’s what i was thinking…
Loving that
@@dhefish8024me too
In some parts it reminds me of The Winner Takes it All 😅
riggor morris
I’m not a hater, but the fact that people are so furious about the jury votes, they make petitions, leave tons of dislikes and negative comments that gain most attention even under this video (the winner’s video!) shows that something went wrong…
I mean, there always were people disappointed in someone’s victory, but this year the negative feedback is mind blowing. Note that it targets the juries, not Loreen herself as she’s still a talented artist. ESC, you better do something about the voting system.
Amen. Mods try to delete critical comments on this video (mine was deleted, no bashing there or anything which would break rules of internet etiquette). Makes it seem like people are cheering the winner but the dislike ratio and the negative mood all on social media platforms and on newspapers don't lie.
She is really popular by people outside this community. This song is currently the 46th most played song in WORLD on Spotify. She is charting in many countries.
Among the countries that voted for cha cha TATTOO is charting much better than Käärijä
@@bilaakis how is it related to the contest? People may listen to her song billions of times, she may be the most popular artist out there, I’m fine with that, but ESC voters gave her SECOND place IN THE CONTEST. With a 130 points margin from the public winner. That’s it.
@@olenaolena9073Why on earth are you making such a big deal out of this? The winner has many many times before not won the televote, this is not unique. The rules are 50% jury 50% public, if you don’t accept the rules then don’t participate. Simple as that.
Jury owns us an explanation. The jury criteria were updated this year to have bigger emphasis on "originality" and "overall impression" instead of just vocals. But I feel juries only voted based on the vocal capabilities. I'm not against jury votes. But jury votes should be less impactful than public votes. Jury members should also be a better representation of various musical backgrounds to better represent all of us. Now it feels they are all same anonymous gatekeepers. In addition jury gives scores based on 4 criteria They need to score these criteria separately and transparently so we can see how the final jury scores by country were formed. How on earth did Käärijä not score great jury scores as originality, performance and overall impression are the 3 criteria, not just "vocal capability"?
I got the impression that jury had decided the winner already before the competition started.
I'm absolutely obsessed with this performance
Scandinavia killed it this year 🔥 Finland, Sweden and Norway Top 3 in the Public Vote 🇫🇮🇸🇪🇳🇴
Finland isn't Scandinavian.
It is lol
@@user-ib2yv6de7j yes it is bud
@@user-ib2yv6de7j bro what
While Denmark is just crying in the corner lol
I'd rather she remained a successful, beloved 2012 winner than a disliked double winner
Maybe she will think that too😂
I liked her a Lot ❤️
You people are just salty the silly loud dude with a mid song didn’t win.
@@FBl yeahh lol all he was saying was cha cha cha nothing else
@@FBl
There were better songs
Like Serbia, Czech Republic?
Sweden performed well, but I don't see the point of sending the same participant (especially one who has already won) for a second time. In addition, the jury on purpose dragged down countries they knew people would vote for, such as Finland, Ukraine, and Norway. And they elevated Loreen so high that even with over 350 votes from the audience, Finland couldn't catch up.
It's an elimination run. You have to win numerous times to even get to the final. It's well deserved
▶️🎸🙋♂️🌸
Everyone can go to the contest. It doesn't matter how many times. It was her choice to perform and she won well deserved
@@oemusikstop with that. Sweden's song was mediocre at best and in no way was twice as better as the second one. But according to Jury Mika New... Loreen's tattoo was twice as good as anything else
@@lyubovvetchnaya1498 🤣😂
間違いなく、誰でもの意見を問わず、素晴らしい。
She is truly a genuine artist. She puts her whole heart and soul into every performance
Its an incredible artist, totaly agree.
yeah. genuine in terms of cheating
Absolutely generic song an lyrics. Yea. Truly an artist, lol
@@brotimwelt Crying after a year is wild
@@brotimwelthow tf will you understand that there are millions of song out there, and it is impossible for one song to not be similar to other songs
I don't know why this performance got so many jury points. It was not better than at least 5 other performances this evening that got not even a third of the points.
After the jury voting the competition was basically over.
For voice and energy
@Anastasia It was one of the top 5 performances, but getting nearly twice as many points as the second place in the jury vote seems fishy
The jury vote is corrupt, they decided who would win beforehand.
In the beginning the Finnish narrator kept on reminding viewers that a solo woman singer has only ever won eurovision twice, which was obviously hinting towards who would win... and a returner (+ not in a bad way, ethnic Moroccan, which by winning would make eurovision "more inclusive")
BECAUSE SHE SING 10 TIMES BETTER THAN OTHER ARTISTS AND THE SONG IS VERY EMOTIONAL- DEAL WITH IT !
So next year get 30 or so opera singers belting songs on there and the one with the beltest belt wins.
Loreen really has the ability to convey emotions through her vocals
Sooooo gooood...gives me goosebumps
How is it possible that the jury that doesnt consist of more than 500 people has 49% of the voting power compared to the millions of public voters. Honestly we can only hope that this system changes in the future.
Either way Im happy that Käärija is getting the recognition though. He is first on the Spotify Global Viral Chart while Loreen is on the 29th. I think that says a lot
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣
This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA.
This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
@@signumcrucis71 your comment is more of a copy-paste than Loreen's song lol.
@@ApricusInaros Artistic expression? It's just a generic love song.
In my country, in the jury were 5 such mediocre musicians that never produced anything worth of listening...
@@ApricusInaros it is generic
2:34 How epic she must've felt that moment... Like a goddess, singing to millions of people in the world... It must be an amazing feeling.
Okay I will say this here. Is Loreen an Eurovision legend? Yes. Did I like euphoria? Yes. Did I like the message of tattoo, the staging and performance? Yes, it was amazing. Did I want her to win? NO. Why? Because by sending Loreen to Eurovision there was no room for other artists to win. Too predictable. I said it in the beginning when I saw she will represent Sweden and my opinion hasn’t change. Anyway, i guess congrats Sweden!
Two years in a row the winners were predictable. Let’s see next year, third time is a charm. 😬
Edit: I didn’t say it was a bad song. It was a *great* song + who *she* is, made her victory almost impossible for the others to beat. Which is unfair. Tell me why countries like portugal, armenia and norway with great vocals were completely forgotten by the juries but they all voted for sweden?
Plus, I wouldn’t have said anything about her win if she won the public vote as well. But she didn’t win the public vote, the jury gave her an unbeaten result. So yeah, as said, unfair.
My thoughts exactly! I'm not mad because Sweden won or because my beloved Finland didn't. I'm disappointed because it feels like the winner was decided already in March. I feel like the others never had a real chance.
But still you must to have a good song to win bro ...
agreed. Euphoria was a great hit, but Tattoo just felt like a bleak copy of Euphoria, i didn't think she deserved to win and I'm Swedish. I was rooting for Germany all the time lol
The contest is about choosing the best song... if people are great creators, they can participate endlessly for me!
What message? Tattoo is the most generic radio song in a while. Angles crying violins playing lol! Also the melody is stolen from several songs. Sweden only won to get an ABBA show for next year (ps. One song that was copied to tattoo is abba winner takes it all)
2:50 the powerful moment in ESC
She won bc of jury votes, finland got more public votes. Jury votes shouldnt affect that much bc how can anyone else win after she received over 300 jury votes.
Why not 300 jury votes if they thought it was that good? It's like saying no to over 300 votes of public...
Yeah, but cha cha cha?public taste is so weird sometimes, come on😄
Jury prefers plagiarism.
@@fuserproducer it might be reaching but I have never heard of any other artist than finnlands... and thats because of a viral tiktok... I'm sure there were lots of ppl that called for finnland because the tiktok was funny
@@fuserproducer That song is very catchy
if we wanna put Loreen back on Eurovision, why can’t we do other artists with a full blown career like Ghost?
They can but they chose not too? Same for sweden, we could have hov1 or anyone instead of new people but they chose not to
Nobody is stopping them.... 🤷
@@hakancarlsson2881 I’d love to see Ghost on Eurovision
well, u know who is contester on Eurovision? The one who's bad at being artist.. Non successfully ones
Blue which was famous back in the day, represented the UK and they scored extremely low?
Loreen it’s not the problem, the juries are and the song contest in general. I am still convinced that the Swedish delegation really planned this out for the 50th anniversary of ABBA. In order to win, this song was created. They chose Loreen, as she is famous and everyone knows that she’s a power-weapon. Tattoo won Melodiefestival because of her. The same happened yesterday. Everyone knew that the song will do good in front of the juries and public
SHE WON FAIR AND SQUARE. GET OVER IT!
@@bigd_selectersmg the coincidences are just too big, its not about "getting over it", it just seems too suspicious and scripted somewhat but nobody can prove it
if the jurys wont exist, it would be easier for anyone to win esc, as the pepole will be voting and its more interessting and more exciting if it exists.
@@bigd_selectersmgGet out of here fool
Is anyone really surprised that a well crafted artistic song and performance had gotten a significantly better jury result than a gimmick fun song that all you remember from is screaming cha cha cha repeatedly?
Her voice is soo angelic I can’t
Better at melfest tho, theyre just so enhanced and soft, they did a very, and i mean very bad job at mixing in eurovision 2023
Она Сирена. Поэтому так.
I really hope for next year’s Eurovision that we don’t have favouritisms towards anyone months before the Eurovision day. Because last year we already knew Ukraine was winning, the same this year but with Sweden. It makes the contest so boring
It was a very correct opinion, I agree
Well then people should stop monitoring the contest months before the actual show. I guess that is the problem, plus the obsession of eurofans with the bookies
contest? heheheh
@@justafella_ yea i like reaaaally love Eurovision but i don't listen to any of the songs and I don't even know the artists until the 1st semifinal so that it's a more enjoyable and unique experience
There’s always been favouritism in Eurovision, I doubt that can change unless they introduce anonymity of countries the songs represent - that would be very interesting if they did that though!
I liked Loreens 2012 song BUT i cant be the only one who would want someone else to win than her. Also i think the juries votes should be 1/3 of all votes because who da hell even cares really is it best singing technique in the world.
Wtf Bro it's a music contest not a show contest
Eurovision is about music and only music. (Talent, performance, etc etc). If it was about circus or something, i could've agreed with you. Sorry..
I agree with the comparison; I didn't think song stood out from yesterday's line up, not in the way her first winner did that year.... I think the idea of rebalancing the Jury vote to be slightly less important isn't a bas one; maybe a 2/5 3/5
But then I'd like to see the results announced togetehr... Right now, all the Jury votes... then the phone votes In One Go.. doesn't work for me Its like watching the first half of a match.. then going off for lunch and just checking back for the final score
@@micheledipietro9223 IT's a SONG contest and this song is anything but original. It's a generic love song and such a Eurovision clichè entry. And the same artist already won with an almost identical song 11 years ago. The juries don't value creativity.
@@micheledipietro9223 Not really, for years now Eurovision has been all about the Show off, that's why you see such big stage productions. They barely care if the song is actually good, as long as the presence is strong
While Loreen is a very good artist with a very good song... as a swede I must admit it is a joke that 200 jury members decide the outcome of this so called contest. It is not the first time, but I hope it was the last. Finland and Käärijä was hands down the true winner. Eurovision better change the voting system going forward. Let each country representative present their tele-votes instead of a so called "jury" vote.
The jury voting is kinda dumb. Most of the time they give points to their neighbors anyway
es el flying free
I think it's so friggin boring with Eurovision these days. Was better back in the day when people actually had some national connection to their country.
No thanks, the competition will be over saturated with green goofballs and joke songs like Finland was this year.
Didn't like the Finland song at all
Amazing song❤🎉Greetings from Pristina( Republic of Kosova)🇽🇰🙋♀️
Loreen is an incredibly talented singer and performer. This is an okay song. It's not that she didn't perform well; I would say just vocally, her singing was likely superior to Käärijä's last night. But this jury vote was bizarrely skewed: if it was solely about vocal skill, how on earth were exceptional performances such as Spain, France, and Portugal voted so low? Based on what I can see online, the jury seems to be made up almost entirely of former Eurovision people (my comment doesn't post when I put a link here, but Google it!). I feel like maybe this played a role in the ridiculous amount of jury points Loreen got as someone who is already an absolute Eurovision icon; ideally, her points should have been better divided between herself, La Zarra, Mimicat, Paloma, etc.
Secondly and more importantly, it is SO OBVIOUS to everyone that Finland was the desired winner. Yes, people love Loreen, 243 points through televoting is a lot. But the stadium audience really reflected how many many people felt last night: so many viewers were hoping and waiting for Käärijä to win and end the night by screaming Cha Cha Cha along with him during his encore. It was a unique, original, upbeat song, while Tattoo was just another bland entry. If literally anyone else besides Loreen had been performing it, I'm not even sure it would have qualified beyond the semis.
So, in conclusion, congratulations to Loreen, but her victory feels frustrating. Now I can no longer remember her as "the queen of Eurovision who sings Euphoria " but "the unnecessarily returning champion who won over a song more people wanted to see win".
Yeah and this is really sad. Now I link her to this frustrating victory, not to Euphoria anymore...
I'm not reading all of that. Happy for you though.
Her performance was boring and pretentious. I'm surprised she got as many televotes as she did.
*Everybody’ s talking about the juries ahah. I have a feeling of déjà vu. Well… At least now you know how it feels! That’s why the TRUE WINNER OF ESC 2016 is Sergey Lazarev who won the televote but was dragged down by the juries.*
*GREETINGS FROM* 🇷🇺🪆
To be honest I think she felt the same way, she didn't seem particularly happy with winning, she seemed to be in disbelief, but not really in a good and celebratory way at literally any point after she won. Look at her vs. Käärijä before she won, and Måneskin after winning. She just didn't seem comfortable at any point.
Is hurts in my throat when i listen to this song because her voice is so powerful, i just dont know how she does it! All in all really impressive the other songs were amazing this year too
It hurts my head
Euphoria was actually impressive and worthy of the First place, this song - not even close to Euphoria.
The berber people livs 3000 m above the see since 25 000 years (some say) They can dance and sing. Problems solved through the evolution. Their airways, including the nose have made it possible because of evolution. Loreen sings in another way than europeans. Her voice is a bit nasal and very strong because of her background.
@@MD_Production then don’t compare it? It’s not supposed to be the same song
@@evwajarl817 A "bit" nasal? She sounds like a duck.
The flareup of Finland compared to the indifference of Sweden, moments before the final results says it all
She's been expected to win Eurovision since even before she won the Swedish competition. That's a lot of pressure. And she seems like a sensitive person. Probably just tired.
Loreen, not Sweden! We where not as chilled let me tell ya! 😂
People need to chill everyone express feelings in different ways
She honestly just seemed high as a kite
@@Zakading i tought the same, shees like high af
I'm a huge fan of her! Greetings from Greece!! ❤❤️ I have ALL of her songs in my collection. Every time I listen to them, I always feel goosebumps all over my body! She's so romantic, so emotional. Absolutely historical and incredible! I love her voice, her style and everything. I hope she'll never quit singing and one day, she'll reach and even overcome the number of 100 released songs!! Her voice is angelic!! And I also hope the number of views on her music videos will get so much higher!! She's a superstar! Best Eurovision contestant ever. Long live Loreen!! And if she ever comes to Greece for a concert, I'll buy a ticket immediately! There's no way I'm gonna miss that historical event. If it ever happens. Thank you!! ❤❤️
@@thekingofcardio8250 she s from Morocco
I thought Tattoo was a pretty average song in comparison to her previous Euphoria. I quietly sat listening to her song. Whereas with Finland's Cha Cha Cha my whole family was up dancing and singing to their song. It was so much fun. That being said, I do think Loreen is a great singer and performer.
Who tf asked lmao
@user-jf2wb2xj5y literally the point of a comments section 🙄
Cha Cha Cha is a terrible song
Plagiarism? : Pont Aeri - Flying Free
@@popdoll4377 never have an opinion again
The voice of this woman is incredible
she is dancing super awesome while she is singing super awesome, the only other person who could do this was michael jackson
@@labohemienne5560 do not compare her to Michael Jackson, there are worlds between them.
@@Brln4087 yes of course, i meant its almost impossible to find artists that can do both, but nobody (exept maybe mozart) can be compared to mj❤️
Only one country walks away with the Eurovision trophy. But plenty more walk away as winners. Many artists who currently charting worldwide
There should be more trophys! Just like Oscars!
@@JustSaying001 That would be nice
Well, there are press, artistic and composition awards
@@EricMachadoRaupp There is? I want to know more about them
@@EricMachadoRaupp yes, 2 won by loreen and 1 by marco mengoni. just shows how pleased professionals are with her win
She is my best singer of all times. I’m in LOVE with this woman ❤️! I’m supporting her since 2011 when I discovered My Heart is Refusing Me as kid at Melodifestivalen and I knew that she will become a big star one year and now I’m 23 and she is winner of two ESCs❤️. I’m beyond proud 😢❤❤❤
It's completely unfair that a song completely predictable and identical to the style of euphoria won .Finland was different and a new artist deserved to win .Plus he actually won the televote with a high difference.
cry about it
AGREEEEEE
Euphoria much much better
But loreen is magnetic
I think it sounded like ABBA The winner takes it all 🤔
ABBA will be celebrating 50 years in 2024. Of course Sweden had to win and hosting the Eurovision next year.
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣
This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA.
This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
Eurovision is corrupted
Let me guess, you're favorite didnt win
@@signumcrucis71 ur basicly copy and pasting this same comment in every comment section.
You are an unreliable source 😂
@@mathom4042 Let me guess, you’re swedish
Слушаю песню в первый раз, а такое ощущение что уже слышал тысячу раз.
«Мика Ньютон - В плену», очень похожа
Me too, kinda boring.
Because you did... The winner takes it all ABBA
кэти пэрри fireworks и abba the winners takes it all звучат абсолютно также
Згачит она поймала твой внутренний вайб
She is so magnificent and gorgeous! Her live vocal is so individual and noticeable, I understand why she is a winner!) true winner!
Let's be honest: i love Loreen, i was obsessed with Euphoria even years after it won, Loreen is hard-working, creative and talented - I'm not denying any of that. I just think that there were way better or catchy songs that could have won. Unfortunately it's a shame this win kinda takes a shade over her and the mark she left on Eurovision in 2012. Anyways, good luck to her i guess.
10000000 % I agre
I am sad for Finland (not my favorite) but people say they are WINER!
AND I RESPECT THEAT!
Swed need to send dj tiesto next year
Ye solo solo was way more catchy 🇵🇱
My thoughts as well. She's a great artist and I'm happy for her but the song is kind of... Eh. It's alright. It's decent. But there were some really creative songs from other countries that stood out way more. Sweden keeps sending the most boring songs ever and this is just gonna reinforce that lmfao
@@Thysillia Yeah, Melodifestivalen would have had to change, now pop music will be produced like never before in Melfest and it will have the same writers. I guess we're not gonna see a swedish song or metal for some time.
United by music divided by the jury 🙄😘
Jury should be eliminated haha
Cry more. I enjoy in your saltiness, biterness and your tears
@@demodexo6742 average loreen stan
It´s as it should be in a competitive, there´s always a winner!
@@2Chor5_13 there shouldn't be the same winner I want a new young winner not the previous ones 😑
United by music 💚
Divided by Jurys 💔
You act like she didnt get 240 points from the people too lmao, stop being a sore loser
Fixed show yet again
Yessss
@@FabsASMR 👍👍
Divided by toxic finnish fans
this song is stuck in my head
stuck to me
LIKE A TATTOO-OO-OOOOOO
Me 2
Pidän kaksin kösin kiinni juomista niikun cha cha cha
Jury just wanted Sweden for the 50th anniversary of Abba win
song is pure plagiarism ! she didn't deserve to win !
The burn 🤣🤣
M M A beginning song music , on 0:29, sounds like Abba song The Winner Takes it All.
@@MM-of1vf they are all mostly plagiarism. Cha cha cha is really close to electric callboys song too. Tho i think Sweden didn't deserve so many jury points
@@claudiuprichici4028 Look at the tell me they didnt want her to win ? :P Was her song twice as good as Israels ? :P Cause she got twice as much points from the jury as second one. They wanted her to win cause they knew, 50 year Abba then in Sweden, this means printing $$$$.
Loreen is a good artist. They have lots of talent in Sweden!
But I still feel that this song was not as amazing as it was made to look dy judges. It was too similar with some other songs... and jury votes were making impossible gap at the start. It felt like she won because she won with an amazing song long time ago. It really gave me mixed feelings. Not hating for the artist, but bad feeling because of the system.
Groupies be votin’ based on her last performance… it’s not fair to the other contestants… they should not be allowed to compete more than once since their fan base will definitely cast their vote in their direction…. What’s next? Seeing a 26 eurovision winners competetion?! Not to mention the song is plagiarized (abba - the winner takes it all)
Like Redone.
Great singer, but the song was awful and sounded awfully familiar.
Telewotiing is so bad Finand try to cheat by giving Sweden lowe points and Israel non.They knew Sweden was going to win but gave the best oponents low points.Shame on Finland and the and ugly finnish people
Totally agree, 2 times bigger points than 2nd place by judges voting, it's like no other great contestans there... And, ye, definitely Loreen was a top contender in the final.
If past winners want to come back .. we should have one whole Eurovision dedicated to just past winners performing against each other. Make it fair. Someone who has won and has a huge music career needs to give someone else a go. On the plus side, hopefully we get Mans and Petra hosting again !!
Ikr!
eurovision of only past winners competing, reminds me of hunger games...
*Meanwhile countries with no winners*
yeah i think that 2009 eurovision song will win
Many past winners have returned. Hellooo??? Dana International? Alexander Ryback? Carola? That wasnt even long time ago.
Ez egy iszonyatosan szép dal, ami felszinre tudja hozni az érzelmeket mindenkiben. A hangja pedig varázslatos. No. 1 nálam 😊
Next year ABBA celebrates 50 years of having been in Eurovision, very useful to celebrate it in Sweden. 🧐 Thank you Jury for deciding the winner this year.
Are you saying that right after Ukraine winning previous year because of Televote?
lul.
Wow 😳
I didn't know about that.
So, know everything is understandable.
Rigged
Isn't Eurovisions motto "United by music" though? Sounds a bit silly that a competition is supposed to unite the people, but then 4-5 "professionals" in each country can decide the entire competition. Especially considering how much EBU pushes the social aspect of the spectacle. Still, can't say the wrong song won with the fact you brought up as it's a pretty cool opportunity next year.
The jury has actually decided every year the winner of Eurovision and not only this year.
I am just so confused, congratulations Sweden but how did they win? Idk i think Austria, France or Finland should have won their performance was more exiting and i could actually hear the lyrics but anyways congratulations to Sweden.
Well she does have over 50mil streams which is the highest of this esc season. Idk why so many people are acting suprised and hating on her. People are hating on her just because finland didn't win. If finland sent a bad song everybody would have loved her win.
She was amazing and gives people goosebumps get over the fact that Finland lost.
@@rinojuric4836 that’s the exact reason no one wanted her to win. It’s a generic pop song, she’s already a well known artist, what in the world is she doing in esc?
@@rinojuric4836 ppl are not mad bc finland didn't win. they're mad bc loreen already won and her coming back took the fun out of the competition. i personally would have been happy for any other country winning, but loreen's song was just so mediocre and predictable and it would not have won so easily if it wasn't loreen singing it.
@@rinojuric4836yes but the people wanted finland with a enormous majority. the jury could not possibly be so out of touch with what people actually want. undeserved win maybe bought.
Loren is prety, with a captivating voice. Love her!
0:29 me when my alarm starts hitting early in the morning and I have to leave my bed.
If her team had promoted her in the USA, not only would Tattoo have been a hit there, it would surely have been nominated for Best pop vocal performance at the Grammys! Loreen has to debut in US, She deserves to win a Grammy!
bruh u down bad she aint gonna shag you
Her team didn't promote her in the US because her team knew she had to win votes from Europeans to win Eurovision. Ultimately though I think Loreen is content being the official queen of Europe
She's now signed to TaP Music, so maybe she could go places now.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Still to this day get all the chills from this song
Very beautifull. Congratulations❤❤❤❤
i love her vocals at the last chorus, they're amazing
+250M streams on Spotify! Respect!
Already?! Feels like it got 200m yesterday🤔👏
Both performances of her have me just fully covered in goose bumps, she is so unbelievably talented ❤
ur dad covered in goose bumps when he gets pegged
LOL!
@@yvettakollega5791•_•
@@BiguswigusBe respectful
@@Biguswigus aww someone mad 🥲
The best ever🔥🔥🔥so powerful
The staging the winning to sweden was so obvious. First of all, next year is the ABBA's 50th anniversary year. Loreen didn't make this song but all the same crew who did the 2012's song Euphoria. In this Tattoo song, there are several parts of which you can definitely hear they're plagiarized. Google Mika Newton for example. Melodies are exactly like that, also some parts of the song "flying free". Also people voted for Käärijä. The only way Sweden got to won was by the jury, and next year's parties definitely wanted to be in Sweden. This is sooo obvious. So Finland was robbed, and Käärijä is the real winner of the show. That's what people wanted.
True, the number of 12 she got from the juries was ridiculous. It’s clear they were pushing her win hard. She was good but NOT THAT good, others had even better vocals, songs, staging. There were lots to choose from and you’re somehow telling me all chose Sweden. Rigged
@@silvermist_fairy Absolutely. There were a lot of beautiful songs and performances, Loreen's performance (all credit to the win) was so could we say dull. Too artistic, so that all the feelings showing looked kinda fake. I liked a lot of Cyprus, Norway and Estonian shows.
the copium Is high in this one
Finland’s representative was trash
Like last years winner wasn’t a pity vote? Eurovision is rigged to the core.
383 MILLION streams on Spotify and has sold Silver, Gold and Platinum in 10 countries. Boom.
your problem not mine🤣
Kaarija could never really
@@antonzanarkandand will never.
And they're still talking about how the pUbLiC didn't like her ahahah talent speaks for itself
2:45 The moment when eurovision was won by Loreen. Amazing energy from the performer.
Raw emotion, raw feelings.......connection of the love
Good joke. "uh hu hu hu hu song" is the most boring ESC winnner from decade
@@prionuscoriarius better than cha cha cha lol
@@sadway502 Well, not according to the public.
@@yvettakollega5791 but its better
Damn this is so much better then this year's winner...
Немо мне не нравится но лично мне кажется что эта песня не заслуживает победы
390 Million streams total on Spotify.
Gold in The UK
Gold in Denmark
Gold in Italy
Gold in Switzerland
Gold in Spain
Platinum in Portugal
Platinum in Belgium
Platinum in Greece
3 Platinum in Poland
Diamond in France
and still less views than cha cha cha on yt
@@ullakeskinen8895 thats the only video tho. Tattoo Audio has 45 M views on yt. The lyrical has 66 M views. The Music video has 11 M views . 🤭 keep viewing that video. Its uploaded on the Eurovision channel. He wont get any coins for those views.
@@ullakeskinen8895 and spotify?
@@ullakeskinen8895because Käärija is a performer and Loreen is a singer/performer.
@@ullakeskinen8895 paid streams and sales > free views
She's a performer !!!
nope. she is thief
@@molecula2215stfu man your just sad that the circus act didn’t win 🤡
@@molecula2215and your a kid
@@RosieKitty-jb4zedamn
Ela é perfeita ❤❤
TATTOO has now Surpassed EUPHORIA on Spotify ❤❤
🎉🎉🎉❤
cha cha fans crying😂😂😂😂
@@Justloveit0they will still continue crying because he lost and Loreen won, meanwhile both Loreen and Käärija are friends and moved on
@@Justloveit0 as a cha cha cha fan I'm not crying I'm happy that we hit 24 million views
@@kaarijafan498 tattoo 150 million +😂😂
Best of world
Her songs got many wise words, this is one of them.
“You got my heart in your hand
don’t lose it my friend
it’s all that I got.”
THIS is beyond powerful !!! The way she pushed the roof up against all the pain to find love, true love for yourself. I could only cry, it's so beautiful and she is incredible. It made me feel all my own hidden pain I thought I processed, but we are never done, it's a constant battle and fight for freedom.
Потому что эта женщина Сирена. Вот где ответ.
Esta interpretación, y su mensaje, "atrapa"!! Fantástica...
De lo mejor de la historia de Eurovision!!
I absolutely adore this performance. Loreen is like an Earth Angel. This is one of the most captivating live performances I’ve ever seen. I FEEL it ❤
Guess Måneskin should perform again as well then :)))))
AS AN ITALIAN, I HOPE SO 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Maneskin managed to make a name for themselves outside of Eurovision, they have no need to return. Loreen on the other hand…might be seeing her again in 10 years
a lot of artists that have won has participated twice, yall just hating on sweden as usual lol
Yes, why not, I see no problem
By far the best winner! ❤️❤️
Absolute slayage
Next year Sweden will represent Loreen 🙂
She can fart on stage and wins....
wouldn't be surprised
Great shade 🤣🤣
as it should! but probably Mans Zelmerlow will comeback
and again will win
Loreen is just stuning...love her voice, her performance and a song
She can be my brown-eyed girl any day 😍