It’s weird that 80% of all nations gave Sweden 12 points, while audience in Liverpool yelling: CHA CHA CHA Televoting: more then 300 points for Finland 👀
Loreen also got high public votes. What she presented is true music performance not a circus show like cha cha , judges voted mostly based on music, while younger people vote mostly for circus shows . It’s not surprising
@@giulia5735there wasn’t much echo unfortunately. During melfest it was much more enjoyable because we could hear the echo and it was more magical (as well as the platform she is standing because Liverpool kinda killed her staging as well)
@@emrefisal7146 ok, but the contest is not to watch a magical performance, the contest gives you a stage and without any help/effect/other voices you need to sing your song, she had an echo effect and, like i said background voices.
@@giulia5735 almost each and every artist had some prerecorded or back vocalist but she didn’t had echo effect lol. You can clearly hear the raw voice from the mic. It would be more enjoyable with echo effect lol but she didn’t have that
Sooo..why doesn't the audience choose the Eurovision winner again? After all, we are the ones who will listen, love and support the song and the singer after it's all done, not some jury. We are the ones who vote (and PAY for those votes) and in the end our votes still don't matter because the jury decides the winner as they wish...
Because you don‘t get the lyrics. Can you tell me the story behind the lyrics of Czech Republic? Or of Croatia? The jury votes not for the performance we see, they vote for a lot of different reasons and criteria
Actually, the audience *does* vote, and it changes a lot the results. Take Finland, for example, they were second because of the public vote and got 0 points from the judges
@@drunkfood3275 And whats your point? If you want to know the meaning of the lyrics you should translate it. Are you assuming that everyone understands English?
@@drunkfood3275 actually they chose who fits best into their narrow minded little Rainbow world and see who's deemed most deserving of a prise funded by the people watching it .
yeah it's cause it's rigged as hell. This somg won't make a phenomenal like for example maneskin did in 2021. Plus she won already so why is she still here??
if the juries are so professional and they judge by vocal performance, how comes that France's La Zarra or Portugal's Mimicat with their phenomenal vocal performances fared so bad with the juries?
I'm 62 yrs old. I've been watching Eurovision for 50 years, since I was 12 yrs old, when ABBA won in 1974, with Waterloo. And so far, in the whole history of Eurovision, Tattoo, is THE atomic bomb 💣 song. It makes my heart soar and weep at the same time. There have been some incredible acts, but Tattoo is No.1. Some other favourites and a very close 2nd, is our own girl Dami Im, who in 2016 represented Australia for the first time with her Sound of Silence., amazing! I also love, Greece's, Helena Paparizou., My Number One. Ukraine's, Verka Serduchka, with Dancing Lasha Tumbai. And Britain's, Sam Ryder with Spaceman.🚀 Cheers, Sophie from Australia 🇦🇺 🍸🍹🍺
me2. i m nearly cry when i watch it first time with my girl Mia in Stuttgart, then i watch it again and again, such an amazing lady indeed and i adore her(him)soooo much, her way of express the power of music art just touchs my heart soooo deeply... i am speechless. i need to go Sweden, her land to discover more amazing arts. greetings from Germany / China. yomemia*mamamia...
Let's not forget how sweden actually gave 12 points to finland on the televote, but finland gave ZERO to sweden. It just shows the character of those supporting the green man
so to those who are saying that loreen also got many points. you have a point. however the jury created such a wide gap between sweden and all other countires, that no realistic public voting could have surpassed it. if it was a normal gap ( and im not saying only finland should have been 2nd in jury voting) kaarija would have passed loreen with many points. there was a 200 points gap in jury voting, which is not both ideal or normal.
The jury exists to counterbalance votes for goof songs and 'meme'-artists. In other words, its job is to keep the competition's credibility intact by stopping artist like the saxophone guy, or Verka Serduchka, or Finland this year. Also, Loreen's song gets three times more play on Spotify than Finland's song. That's a better gague of what the people really prefer.
@@JJJ111JJJ bro if she really deserved all her jury points then why didn’t other countries like spain get so much more (cause they were just as good, if not better). and her song gets more played probably because she won the eurovision before and therefore she’s more famous? love how you made zero points there💀💀
The outrage isn't about which song is better, or if Loreen deserved to win or not, people got bitter because they loved one song, they voted for it (and let's remember, you have to pay for your vote), and in the end it didn't matter because the jury has more power to chose whatever they want. If Finland had received the 12 points from EVERY country's televote, he would have win with a difference of only 11 points. The jury made it practically impossible for anyone else but Loreen to win. What is the point of having people voting if it's gonna be like this? He was the second most voted in Eurovision's History and it meant nothing for the final results. I'd say that even if you like Tattoo better, you could understand the general feeling of injustice ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The point is to have a jury that reprimands meaningless lyrics and weak vocals. His song is suitable for the Finnish pubs, not the Eurovision stage. At least the juries appreciate that this is a singing contest
@@Justhomasd i get your point but you say pointless lyrics? The eurovision is full of songs with pintless lyrics. And if you know what Käärijä even sang you would know that the lyrics arent wven that crazy, atleast compared to some other past performances
I understand your frustration but this voting system has been going on for years, it’s not like they changed it this year to make Loreen win. There were other Eurovision winners like Jamala and Duncan Laurence that didn’t win the televote but still managed to win the contest with the help of the jury. Plus keep in mind that Loreen came 2nd in the televote which is still a very popular result, it’s not like she came at the bottom.
@@GGGaming-by9vz Exactly, Loreen’s lyrics are not something we haven’t heard before and are generic, but at least they are not about drinking, pina colada, getting wasted on the dance floor etc I mean come on
Are you dumb? If less people voted for Loreen Finland would still win. It’s a combination of jury and people. I’m happy it is. You don’t want a rich organisation to spam votes for someone they want to win for whatever reasons. And stop being bitter people. This is a true class act. It saddens me that majority of people nowadays have the mental capacity of a crack baby. Finland was fun but doesn’t even reach the knees of Loreen’s act. Be real.
I think she went from being one of the most popular ESC winners to being one of the least popular. She received 12 points from the public exactly 0 times (Finland 18 times). I wonder what it must have been like for her with the crowd chanting Cha cha cha.
She knows her song was streamed more than twice as much. The public votes dont mean anything. Its just a game of how clowney and quirky an act can get. That is why croatia was in there in the first place.
@@Oskyldig-ot1yr wahwah, eurovision is about creativity. cha cha cha was a perfect mix of different genres. you’ve heard something like tattoo a thousand times i bet.
@@korverses I agree. Eurovision is known for it's mix of perfect talent and excelling creativity. The crowd loves a song with a crazy vibe. Acts like Cha Cha Cha is what makes Eurovision Eurovision, and not just another contest like the Voice.
I loved the part when she tried (and failed) to act happy and surprised during the jury vote. Public voting has its problems but Jurys are just a corrupt system.
As usual!!! All knew that she wuld have win........next year Sweden will celebrate the ABBA 50* anniversary!!!!besides the song was almost similar that one from the film MAMMA MIA!!!🤗🤗🤗😳😳
I agree with you. The problem is, jury votes sometimes for songs which are sung terribly. I don't think Loreen's vocals in the final was technically good even with comparison to another performers. Norway was in my opinion much better in this case and I'm not from Scandinavia 🙂
50 years ago ABBA won Eurovision today. And they have been a big inspiration for many Swedish artists. Loreen was so happy when someone told her that this song reminded them about ABBA. That was a big compliment for her
@@kummingo Agreed and who cares really, if it reminds someone of ABBA (Sweden) for me thats awsome. This song is amazing in any case, cheers from Sweden!
I've heard that next year Abba is going to represent Sweden. Australia is going to answer with AC/DC and Germany is going to shoot with Rammstein. I mean, why not?
Rammstein would never do that. I don't know who told you this but this is definitely not true. They would never waste their time for this shitshow lol. People didn't even appreciate the talent of lord of the lost, why should Rammstein waste their time there? My country should just waste some rarely known musicians who Sound like everyone else out there.
@@thehellsraven nah, don't worry, I was just trying to point out how cheap it is to send internationally well know artists to this kind of competition. On a side note though, Germany didn't deserve the treatment they got this year.
She's been expected to win Eurovision since even before she won the Swedish competition. That's a lot of pressure. And she seems like a sensitive person. Probably just tired.
Jury points should not exceed the people's given points. There is definitely something wrong if a single piece gains about double points than others and still lose!
This is exactly the point of Jury. People vote for songs like Solo o Mamma SC, Juries can valorate correctly to Spain, Estonia, Italy and other great songs that people don't valorate.
It just seems that the costumes and stage have come to play an important part in promoting the song. Personally I thought the song was so so and similar to some song I heard before.
Yes, I have the exact feeling I heard something like this before; at some way it reminds me of Morandi -Angels, but there is something else like this. Also feel like the song is ordinary
Loreen it’s not the problem, the juries are and the song contest in general. I am still convinced that the Swedish delegation really planned this out for the 50th anniversary of ABBA. In order to win, this song was created. They chose Loreen, as she is famous and everyone knows that she’s a power-weapon. Tattoo won Melodiefestival because of her. The same happened yesterday. Everyone knew that the song will do good in front of the juries and public
@@bigd_selectersmg the coincidences are just too big, its not about "getting over it", it just seems too suspicious and scripted somewhat but nobody can prove it
if the jurys wont exist, it would be easier for anyone to win esc, as the pepole will be voting and its more interessting and more exciting if it exists.
Is anyone really surprised that a well crafted artistic song and performance had gotten a significantly better jury result than a gimmick fun song that all you remember from is screaming cha cha cha repeatedly?
Not gonna lie, Loreen performance was absolutely beautiful and wished her high notes but I think it is totally unfair that(often biased) the jury are voting and robbing points from many artists. Look how Norway was robbed but it was one of the song with highest points given from public. And of course the winner was Finland which would be on 1st place if not jury points.
Norway Was Absolutely Robbed Of What Should Have Been A Win . Loreen Was Already Well Known So She Swooped Up All The Votes And Tried To Act Surprised!
Norway hadn't a great performance! I don't know if it was a tech issue or she lost her voice, but she wasn't at her best. She just had a lot of social media fans ! Finland was much better 🎉
Okay I will say this here. Is Loreen an Eurovision legend? Yes. Did I like euphoria? Yes. Did I like the message of tattoo, the staging and performance? Yes, it was amazing. Did I want her to win? NO. Why? Because by sending Loreen to Eurovision there was no room for other artists to win. Too predictable. I said it in the beginning when I saw she will represent Sweden and my opinion hasn’t change. Anyway, i guess congrats Sweden! Two years in a row the winners were predictable. Let’s see next year, third time is a charm. 😬 Edit: I didn’t say it was a bad song. It was a *great* song + who *she* is, made her victory almost impossible for the others to beat. Which is unfair. Tell me why countries like portugal, armenia and norway with great vocals were completely forgotten by the juries but they all voted for sweden? Plus, I wouldn’t have said anything about her win if she won the public vote as well. But she didn’t win the public vote, the jury gave her an unbeaten result. So yeah, as said, unfair.
My thoughts exactly! I'm not mad because Sweden won or because my beloved Finland didn't. I'm disappointed because it feels like the winner was decided already in March. I feel like the others never had a real chance.
agreed. Euphoria was a great hit, but Tattoo just felt like a bleak copy of Euphoria, i didn't think she deserved to win and I'm Swedish. I was rooting for Germany all the time lol
What message? Tattoo is the most generic radio song in a while. Angles crying violins playing lol! Also the melody is stolen from several songs. Sweden only won to get an ABBA show for next year (ps. One song that was copied to tattoo is abba winner takes it all)
Sweden performed well, but I don't see the point of sending the same participant (especially one who has already won) for a second time. In addition, the jury on purpose dragged down countries they knew people would vote for, such as Finland, Ukraine, and Norway. And they elevated Loreen so high that even with over 350 votes from the audience, Finland couldn't catch up.
@@oemusikstop with that. Sweden's song was mediocre at best and in no way was twice as better as the second one. But according to Jury Mika New... Loreen's tattoo was twice as good as anything else
I’m not a hater, but the fact that people are so furious about the jury votes, they make petitions, leave tons of dislikes and negative comments that gain most attention even under this video (the winner’s video!) shows that something went wrong… I mean, there always were people disappointed in someone’s victory, but this year the negative feedback is mind blowing. Note that it targets the juries, not Loreen herself as she’s still a talented artist. ESC, you better do something about the voting system.
Amen. Mods try to delete critical comments on this video (mine was deleted, no bashing there or anything which would break rules of internet etiquette). Makes it seem like people are cheering the winner but the dislike ratio and the negative mood all on social media platforms and on newspapers don't lie.
She is really popular by people outside this community. This song is currently the 46th most played song in WORLD on Spotify. She is charting in many countries. Among the countries that voted for cha cha TATTOO is charting much better than Käärijä
@@bilaakis how is it related to the contest? People may listen to her song billions of times, she may be the most popular artist out there, I’m fine with that, but ESC voters gave her SECOND place IN THE CONTEST. With a 130 points margin from the public winner. That’s it.
@@olenaolena9073Why on earth are you making such a big deal out of this? The winner has many many times before not won the televote, this is not unique. The rules are 50% jury 50% public, if you don’t accept the rules then don’t participate. Simple as that.
Jury owns us an explanation. The jury criteria were updated this year to have bigger emphasis on "originality" and "overall impression" instead of just vocals. But I feel juries only voted based on the vocal capabilities. I'm not against jury votes. But jury votes should be less impactful than public votes. Jury members should also be a better representation of various musical backgrounds to better represent all of us. Now it feels they are all same anonymous gatekeepers. In addition jury gives scores based on 4 criteria They need to score these criteria separately and transparently so we can see how the final jury scores by country were formed. How on earth did Käärijä not score great jury scores as originality, performance and overall impression are the 3 criteria, not just "vocal capability"? I got the impression that jury had decided the winner already before the competition started.
Euphoria was masterpiece and one of the best songs on esc. Tattoo is just a good song. Definitely deserves top spots but not a win. Not in a dream and whole audience who watched the show live knew that.
There was nothing better than Tattoo though. I can understand people being upset about a previous winner, but to me nothing beat this last night. This one had me from the first few seconds.
I don't know why this performance got so many jury points. It was not better than at least 5 other performances this evening that got not even a third of the points. After the jury voting the competition was basically over.
The jury vote is corrupt, they decided who would win beforehand. In the beginning the Finnish narrator kept on reminding viewers that a solo woman singer has only ever won eurovision twice, which was obviously hinting towards who would win... and a returner (+ not in a bad way, ethnic Moroccan, which by winning would make eurovision "more inclusive")
It's completely unfair that a song completely predictable and identical to the style of euphoria won .Finland was different and a new artist deserved to win .Plus he actually won the televote with a high difference.
It's been a year and people still complain about Loreen win, yet this song has over half a billion streans on Spotify and is the one who scored the biggest chart success, so maybe the true "public winner" was this
Next year ABBA celebrates 50 years of having been in Eurovision, very useful to celebrate it in Sweden. 🧐 Thank you Jury for deciding the winner this year.
Isn't Eurovisions motto "United by music" though? Sounds a bit silly that a competition is supposed to unite the people, but then 4-5 "professionals" in each country can decide the entire competition. Especially considering how much EBU pushes the social aspect of the spectacle. Still, can't say the wrong song won with the fact you brought up as it's a pretty cool opportunity next year.
@@MM-of1vf they are all mostly plagiarism. Cha cha cha is really close to electric callboys song too. Tho i think Sweden didn't deserve so many jury points
@@claudiuprichici4028 Look at the tell me they didnt want her to win ? :P Was her song twice as good as Israels ? :P Cause she got twice as much points from the jury as second one. They wanted her to win cause they knew, 50 year Abba then in Sweden, this means printing $$$$.
So far, no one from 2024 reaches the level of this song and performance. It will be many years until we will see a performance of such a high vocal and visual level at Eurovision again.
If her team had promoted her in the USA, not only would Tattoo have been a hit there, it would surely have been nominated for Best pop vocal performance at the Grammys! Loreen has to debut in US, She deserves to win a Grammy!
Her team didn't promote her in the US because her team knew she had to win votes from Europeans to win Eurovision. Ultimately though I think Loreen is content being the official queen of Europe
She won bc of jury votes, finland got more public votes. Jury votes shouldnt affect that much bc how can anyone else win after she received over 300 jury votes.
@@fuserproducer it might be reaching but I have never heard of any other artist than finnlands... and thats because of a viral tiktok... I'm sure there were lots of ppl that called for finnland because the tiktok was funny
I would really like to know the rules the jury votes by. Like: Are they voting on a live performance only? Has it to be the exact same one as the audience saw? How are the votes calculated? When does a country announce the jury members? I think more transparency would be a great idea overall. 😊
Loreen copied Mika Newtons song Tatoo and next year is Abba 50th celebration. Of course she had to win ! So it was corrupted. dusty old boring love songs and ballads, what else. She is also signed with warner bros who support juries in each country
I liked Loreens 2012 song BUT i cant be the only one who would want someone else to win than her. Also i think the juries votes should be 1/3 of all votes because who da hell even cares really is it best singing technique in the world.
I agree with the comparison; I didn't think song stood out from yesterday's line up, not in the way her first winner did that year.... I think the idea of rebalancing the Jury vote to be slightly less important isn't a bas one; maybe a 2/5 3/5 But then I'd like to see the results announced togetehr... Right now, all the Jury votes... then the phone votes In One Go.. doesn't work for me Its like watching the first half of a match.. then going off for lunch and just checking back for the final score
@@micheledipietro9223 IT's a SONG contest and this song is anything but original. It's a generic love song and such a Eurovision clichè entry. And the same artist already won with an almost identical song 11 years ago. The juries don't value creativity.
@@micheledipietro9223 Not really, for years now Eurovision has been all about the Show off, that's why you see such big stage productions. They barely care if the song is actually good, as long as the presence is strong
I really hope for next year’s Eurovision that we don’t have favouritisms towards anyone months before the Eurovision day. Because last year we already knew Ukraine was winning, the same this year but with Sweden. It makes the contest so boring
Well then people should stop monitoring the contest months before the actual show. I guess that is the problem, plus the obsession of eurofans with the bookies
@@justafella_ yea i like reaaaally love Eurovision but i don't listen to any of the songs and I don't even know the artists until the 1st semifinal so that it's a more enjoyable and unique experience
There’s always been favouritism in Eurovision, I doubt that can change unless they introduce anonymity of countries the songs represent - that would be very interesting if they did that though!
as I said, once peoples sodium lvl dropped they'd come around on this. 650m streams on spotify later, I think it's safe to say this victory was deserved.
@@cryptidddd no bcs without the jury the competition would suck and kids songs like cha cha cha would win the competition when there are people who actually can sing and deserve the win much more
While Loreen is a very good artist with a very good song... as a swede I must admit it is a joke that 200 jury members decide the outcome of this so called contest. It is not the first time, but I hope it was the last. Finland and Käärijä was hands down the true winner. Eurovision better change the voting system going forward. Let each country representative present their tele-votes instead of a so called "jury" vote.
I think it's so friggin boring with Eurovision these days. Was better back in the day when people actually had some national connection to their country.
I thought Tattoo was a pretty average song in comparison to her previous Euphoria. I quietly sat listening to her song. Whereas with Finland's Cha Cha Cha my whole family was up dancing and singing to their song. It was so much fun. That being said, I do think Loreen is a great singer and performer.
If past winners want to come back .. we should have one whole Eurovision dedicated to just past winners performing against each other. Make it fair. Someone who has won and has a huge music career needs to give someone else a go. On the plus side, hopefully we get Mans and Petra hosting again !!
The audience also chose Sweden... she literally came second in the televote. Also this is not the first or last time the 'Televote winner' doesn't win the overall contest. Literally look at 2015, 2016, 2019, 2022
@@Thjonsson1 are you kidding... We don't count commercial success as votes. We want a system where our votes matter, produce outcomes and aren't just ways for the show to steal money and look more democratic at the same time. All that while the juries can out-veto you enough to push an already established artist over an upcoming artist that will come to loathe this corrupt contest
@@antonisgera please Wake up. Eurovision has not produced any artist since Celine Dion on world stage level. For the last 25 years every winner is forgotten after 6 months.
Is hurts in my throat when i listen to this song because her voice is so powerful, i just dont know how she does it! All in all really impressive the other songs were amazing this year too
The berber people livs 3000 m above the see since 25 000 years (some say) They can dance and sing. Problems solved through the evolution. Their airways, including the nose have made it possible because of evolution. Loreen sings in another way than europeans. Her voice is a bit nasal and very strong because of her background.
Loreen is an incredibly talented singer and performer. This is an okay song. It's not that she didn't perform well; I would say just vocally, her singing was likely superior to Käärijä's last night. But this jury vote was bizarrely skewed: if it was solely about vocal skill, how on earth were exceptional performances such as Spain, France, and Portugal voted so low? Based on what I can see online, the jury seems to be made up almost entirely of former Eurovision people (my comment doesn't post when I put a link here, but Google it!). I feel like maybe this played a role in the ridiculous amount of jury points Loreen got as someone who is already an absolute Eurovision icon; ideally, her points should have been better divided between herself, La Zarra, Mimicat, Paloma, etc. Secondly and more importantly, it is SO OBVIOUS to everyone that Finland was the desired winner. Yes, people love Loreen, 243 points through televoting is a lot. But the stadium audience really reflected how many many people felt last night: so many viewers were hoping and waiting for Käärijä to win and end the night by screaming Cha Cha Cha along with him during his encore. It was a unique, original, upbeat song, while Tattoo was just another bland entry. If literally anyone else besides Loreen had been performing it, I'm not even sure it would have qualified beyond the semis. So, in conclusion, congratulations to Loreen, but her victory feels frustrating. Now I can no longer remember her as "the queen of Eurovision who sings Euphoria " but "the unnecessarily returning champion who won over a song more people wanted to see win".
*Everybody’ s talking about the juries ahah. I have a feeling of déjà vu. Well… At least now you know how it feels! That’s why the TRUE WINNER OF ESC 2016 is Sergey Lazarev who won the televote but was dragged down by the juries.* *GREETINGS FROM* 🇷🇺🪆
To be honest I think she felt the same way, she didn't seem particularly happy with winning, she seemed to be in disbelief, but not really in a good and celebratory way at literally any point after she won. Look at her vs. Käärijä before she won, and Måneskin after winning. She just didn't seem comfortable at any point.
@@Anton-kn4gx well maybe the people should stop watching esc all together, if our opinions are so bad? Only the jury watch it from now, cause everyone else is so dumb
Fun fact: Everyone now is mad at Loreen, because she win. But she got 243 POINTS from audience! No 20, 40 or 60 but nearly 250 points! Anyways, her song is masterpiece!
Loreen is a good artist. They have lots of talent in Sweden! But I still feel that this song was not as amazing as it was made to look dy judges. It was too similar with some other songs... and jury votes were making impossible gap at the start. It felt like she won because she won with an amazing song long time ago. It really gave me mixed feelings. Not hating for the artist, but bad feeling because of the system.
Groupies be votin’ based on her last performance… it’s not fair to the other contestants… they should not be allowed to compete more than once since their fan base will definitely cast their vote in their direction…. What’s next? Seeing a 26 eurovision winners competetion?! Not to mention the song is plagiarized (abba - the winner takes it all)
Telewotiing is so bad Finand try to cheat by giving Sweden lowe points and Israel non.They knew Sweden was going to win but gave the best oponents low points.Shame on Finland and the and ugly finnish people
Totally agree, 2 times bigger points than 2nd place by judges voting, it's like no other great contestans there... And, ye, definitely Loreen was a top contender in the final.
I find this is the case with most Eurovision songs. They all sound better on stage when the artist is singing their heart out to win. In a recording studio it tends to sound weaker in my opinion.
Not sure about other artists, but this has always been the case with Loreen, she performs with all of her heart and soul on stage, if there is anyone I would prefer to hear live than studio it's her
I'm sure they do love you, but express it differently to maybe how you expect. Please try to look at the positives and enjoy your youth and life. It goes by real fast. I hope you feel a little better soon on the matter.
Another day, another slay. New certification for Tattoo, is a Gold record in Italy for the equivalent of 50,000 copies sold. Tattoo is has been certificated: -Gold in France, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland and Italy -Platinum in Greece and Poland. -Silver in the UK. We have to be very happy because the Winner Song of Eurovision 2023 is a big hit and that gives prestige, visibility and recognition to the festival. Congrats Loreen.
@@nataliamoscow7377 no, is not. A song is considered plagiarims when 8 compasses are the same, is not the case. U are you are confusing a harmonic progression with plagiarism.
@@bermerubioизвините, не путаю. Когда слушаю песню “Tattoo”, то голове слышу песню «В плену». Я даже назвала бы “Tattoo” кавером.) А начало прям один в один. Вы, вообще, слушали песню Мики?
@@bermerubioкстати, вы знаете, что Мика также участвовала в конкурсе Евровидения, но на год раньше, чем Лорин? Она заняла 4-е место. Как вы думаете, Лорин знала предыдущих участников, особенно первую десятку?
@@nataliamoscow7377 si y no hay ningún parecido, sólo el pre estribillo y es porque es progresión armónica, cómo tienen muchísimas canciones cómo Easy on me de Adele por ejemplo. No hay ningún plagio.
Everybody complaining about the jury votes, might not be old enough to remember a time when we only had televoting in eurovision. They introduced the jurys for a reason. Block voting is a thing.
Loved Loreen in 2012. I could understand the lyrics. Sadly, this song did not have the same range and I could not understand it’s lyrics. Her presentation in 2012 was a novelty, this time, despite the adornments, it was simply an extension of her previous performance.
This is art. Something never seen before. The song is surgically perfect. Also she has an aura, a presence, a talent that is rare to see. So deserving. Now try to sing this well while lying down with your core tight all the time. This is genius. The outfit, her body, abs, nails, hair, lyrics, stage... Everything was perfect and by far the best performance of this year's edition which frankly was lackluster. She had no competition.
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣 This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA. This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
I want to say something to those who criticize Loreen’s vocals. During Eurovision week, the contestants sing their songs live (rehearsals, technical corrections) almost 10 times. And because Tattoo is a difficult song to sing, it tires the jaw and mouth a lot while singing it. Since Loreen had sung this song many times before the contest and during the week of the contest, her vocal cords were now very tired. If you look at the concerts she gave after the contest, you can see how beautifully she sang. And what's more, she sings the song in here with an ear microphone, not a normal microphone. Anyway she is amazing, and her vocals are unique
![All Winners of Eurovision Song Contest [1956-2023]](/img/n.gif)
I think they should do a eurovision where all the winners from previous once face off in the ”ultimate” eurovision
What a show it would be
YES!!! :D
Eurovision Hunger Games 😂
I like the idea!!!
Eurovision All Stars
It’s weird that 80% of all nations gave Sweden 12 points, while audience in Liverpool yelling: CHA CHA CHA
Televoting: more then 300 points for Finland 👀
Comments are being removed as well.
Loreen also got high public votes. What she presented is true music performance not a circus show like cha cha , judges voted mostly based on music, while younger people vote mostly for circus shows . It’s not surprising
@Anfield Road ur in minority nword
Well, jury voting is also a thing in this competition and have always been
@@Volvith 😂😂😂😂😂
Who is here after Eurovision 2024
+
I am😁
meee
Mee! Its just that tattoo was such a good performance and I miss 2023 eurovision
❤🎉
They gave her just a box, a microphone and lot of sand and she set up an illusion in the desert. Truly professional.
*and an echo effect, background voices, smoke and special effects
SAAAAND, SAAAAAAND! I can feel you slipping through my hands
@@giulia5735there wasn’t much echo unfortunately. During melfest it was much more enjoyable because we could hear the echo and it was more magical (as well as the platform she is standing because Liverpool kinda killed her staging as well)
@@emrefisal7146 ok, but the contest is not to watch a magical performance, the contest gives you a stage and without any help/effect/other voices you need to sing your song, she had an echo effect and, like i said background voices.
@@giulia5735 almost each and every artist had some prerecorded or back vocalist but she didn’t had echo effect lol. You can clearly hear the raw voice from the mic. It would be more enjoyable with echo effect lol but she didn’t have that
Sooo..why doesn't the audience choose the Eurovision winner again? After all, we are the ones who will listen, love and support the song and the singer after it's all done, not some jury. We are the ones who vote (and PAY for those votes) and in the end our votes still don't matter because the jury decides the winner as they wish...
Because you don‘t get the lyrics. Can you tell me the story behind the lyrics of Czech Republic? Or of Croatia? The jury votes not for the performance we see, they vote for a lot of different reasons and criteria
Actually, the audience *does* vote, and it changes a lot the results. Take Finland, for example, they were second because of the public vote and got 0 points from the judges
@@drunkfood3275 And whats your point? If you want to know the meaning of the lyrics you should translate it. Are you assuming that everyone understands English?
@@drunkfood3275 actually they chose who fits best into their narrow minded little Rainbow world and see who's deemed most deserving of a prise funded by the people watching it .
Ukraine won last year due to the peoples' sympathy votes, dunno how you say the audience has no impact ever
I think it's the first time I am reading so many negative comments about a winning song ❗
There is a reason for that... Simple! Same song like Mika Ñewton - В плену. Actually...
@@icemynth1094And the Winner takes it all..... Copy paste:/
yeah it's cause it's rigged as hell. This somg won't make a phenomenal like for example maneskin did in 2021. Plus she won already so why is she still here??
@@anastasiam.3029 Next year taking that song from ABBA and suprise... again win. Mahtavaaaaaaa!
because cha cha fans are salty asf right now lmao😂😂
if the juries are so professional and they judge by vocal performance, how comes that France's La Zarra or Portugal's Mimicat with their phenomenal vocal performances fared so bad with the juries?
Because the songs are mid
i think the jury votes a day before the esc final.
juries have stockholm syndrome
question of the day
@@NateEMG and Tattoo, as a generic mass-produced Euphoria 2.5 isn't?
I'm 62 yrs old. I've been watching Eurovision for 50 years, since I was 12 yrs old, when ABBA won in 1974, with Waterloo. And so far, in the whole history of Eurovision, Tattoo, is THE atomic bomb 💣 song. It makes my heart soar and weep at the same time. There have been some incredible acts, but Tattoo is No.1. Some other favourites and a very close 2nd, is our own girl Dami Im, who in 2016 represented Australia for the first time with her Sound of Silence., amazing! I also love, Greece's, Helena Paparizou., My Number One. Ukraine's, Verka Serduchka, with Dancing Lasha Tumbai. And Britain's, Sam Ryder with Spaceman.🚀 Cheers, Sophie from Australia 🇦🇺 🍸🍹🍺
За Верка Сердечка лайк!😀👍
kesinlikle bundan daha iyisi yok. muhteşem bir müzik abidesi.
me2. i m nearly cry when i watch it first time with my girl Mia in Stuttgart, then i watch it again and again, such an amazing lady indeed and i adore her(him)soooo much, her way of express the power of music art just touchs my heart soooo deeply... i am speechless. i need to go Sweden, her land to discover more amazing arts. greetings from Germany / China. yomemia*mamamia...
@@zenobiapalmyra5670 Rise Like a Phoenix sung by Conchita Wurst is soooo good
@@zenobiapalmyra5670 я с вам согласен,Привет из Казахстана,песня просто супер,а голос вау
Its crazy that Loreen sounds so much better live than in the studio version. Not many artists can do that.
Yea, she also such a good performer, But only her, Brunette, Alika, Blanca Paloma and La Zarra sounded better than studio
Many artists can do that.
@michaelisno4892 can you describe the sound of “ass”?
@michaelisno4892 You know Käärijä is a man right? I think you mistakenly said she instead of he.
@@RosieKitty-jb4ze La Zarra? She was so weak live thats why she didnt end in the top 10.
It was cute when she thanked the public while she should be thanking the juries
Not a single, solitary 12 from the televote. 😂
@@vveles because all of them went to Finland lol, Sweden had the second highest televote so it wasn't all juries
@@felixgissemusic8767 I'm proud of my country for giving him 12 in televote, without any geographic, linguistic, cultural, or diasporic ties. ❤
@@felixgissemusic8767 But that makes it all juries considering shed be second without it
Let's not forget how sweden actually gave 12 points to finland on the televote, but finland gave ZERO to sweden. It just shows the character of those supporting the green man
so to those who are saying that loreen also got many points. you have a point. however the jury created such a wide gap between sweden and all other countires, that no realistic public voting could have surpassed it. if it was a normal gap ( and im not saying only finland should have been 2nd in jury voting) kaarija would have passed loreen with many points. there was a 200 points gap in jury voting, which is not both ideal or normal.
Yup you’re right. Loreen was great but Käärijä was something else
The jury exists to counterbalance votes for goof songs and 'meme'-artists. In other words, its job is to keep the competition's credibility intact by stopping artist like the saxophone guy, or Verka Serduchka, or Finland this year.
Also, Loreen's song gets three times more play on Spotify than Finland's song. That's a better gague of what the people really prefer.
I see your point, but the problem is that only public votes would be crazy, just look at what happened to Georgia this year
Keep crying
@@JJJ111JJJ bro if she really deserved all her jury points then why didn’t other countries like spain get so much more (cause they were just as good, if not better). and her song gets more played probably because she won the eurovision before and therefore she’s more famous? love how you made zero points there💀💀
Its been almost a year and I'm still mentally here
И я…..
so real 😭😭
I was there ❤
not me
@@randomdude8852blud is still here ☠️
The outrage isn't about which song is better, or if Loreen deserved to win or not, people got bitter because they loved one song, they voted for it (and let's remember, you have to pay for your vote), and in the end it didn't matter because the jury has more power to chose whatever they want.
If Finland had received the 12 points from EVERY country's televote, he would have win with a difference of only 11 points. The jury made it practically impossible for anyone else but Loreen to win. What is the point of having people voting if it's gonna be like this? He was the second most voted in Eurovision's History and it meant nothing for the final results.
I'd say that even if you like Tattoo better, you could understand the general feeling of injustice ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The point is to have a jury that reprimands meaningless lyrics and weak vocals. His song is suitable for the Finnish pubs, not the Eurovision stage. At least the juries appreciate that this is a singing contest
@@Justhomasd i get your point but you say pointless lyrics? The eurovision is full of songs with pintless lyrics. And if you know what Käärijä even sang you would know that the lyrics arent wven that crazy, atleast compared to some other past performances
I understand your frustration but this voting system has been going on for years, it’s not like they changed it this year to make Loreen win. There were other Eurovision winners like Jamala and Duncan Laurence that didn’t win the televote but still managed to win the contest with the help of the jury. Plus keep in mind that Loreen came 2nd in the televote which is still a very popular result, it’s not like she came at the bottom.
@@GGGaming-by9vz Exactly, Loreen’s lyrics are not something we haven’t heard before and are generic, but at least they are not about drinking, pina colada, getting wasted on the dance floor etc I mean come on
Are you dumb? If less people voted for Loreen Finland would still win. It’s a combination of jury and people. I’m happy it is. You don’t want a rich organisation to spam votes for someone they want to win for whatever reasons.
And stop being bitter people. This is a true class act. It saddens me that majority of people nowadays have the mental capacity of a crack baby. Finland was fun but doesn’t even reach the knees of Loreen’s act. Be real.
I think she went from being one of the most popular ESC winners to being one of the least popular. She received 12 points from the public exactly 0 times (Finland 18 times). I wonder what it must have been like for her with the crowd chanting Cha cha cha.
Finland looked like a clown show and the song was horrible. It's a SONG contest not a clown act. Loreen was much better and deserved the win
She knows her song was streamed more than twice as much. The public votes dont mean anything. Its just a game of how clowney and quirky an act can get. That is why croatia was in there in the first place.
@Oskyldig And yet it received the second highest televote of all time
@@Oskyldig-ot1yr wahwah, eurovision is about creativity. cha cha cha was a perfect mix of different genres. you’ve heard something like tattoo a thousand times i bet.
@@korverses I agree. Eurovision is known for it's mix of perfect talent and excelling creativity. The crowd loves a song with a crazy vibe. Acts like Cha Cha Cha is what makes Eurovision Eurovision, and not just another contest like the Voice.
I loved the part when she tried (and failed) to act happy and surprised during the jury vote.
Public voting has its problems but Jurys are just a corrupt system.
As usual!!! All knew that she wuld have win........next year Sweden will celebrate the ABBA 50* anniversary!!!!besides the song was almost similar that one from the film MAMMA MIA!!!🤗🤗🤗😳😳
And televote doesn't care about the songthey only care about entertainment. 😒
Bravo..Good point..👍
I agree with you. The problem is, jury votes sometimes for songs which are sung terribly. I don't think Loreen's vocals in the final was technically good even with comparison to another performers. Norway was in my opinion much better in this case and I'm not from Scandinavia 🙂
@@rybarybitwa so Finnlands vocals are way beyond good. He has vocals like Celine dion? You kidding?
50 years ago ABBA won Eurovision today.
And they have been a big inspiration for many Swedish artists.
Loreen was so happy when someone told her that this song reminded them about ABBA. That was a big compliment for her
This song does NOT sound like ABBA
I agree with you. For me this is not ABBA. But maybe people that’s not so familiar with ABBA think so
@@kummingo Agreed and who cares really, if it reminds someone of ABBA (Sweden) for me thats awsome. This song is amazing in any case, cheers from Sweden!
@@Brln4087it sounds like the winner takes it all from ABBA, at least the melody she sings at some points
@@rosamittermeier5214I mean only the beginning. That's where the similiarities end.
that's simply unfair, the point gap was too huge for jury voting
United by Music,
Divided by Jury.
++++++
It was just boring when you knew that Sweden is getting 12 points because they didn't give anything lower.
RIGGED ??? I think that is likely !
@@arteriuszyt1672 she has best song ,best voice ,best performance !!! she deserve to win !!
We have "Euphoria" at home
Euphoria 2.0 baby
@@lioncvet21 Yes, and I loved it
i prefer Tatoo
We would be so lucky🤩
@@Wooplot I prefer none. I mean she already won, what was she doing there? Unfair towards artists who came the 1st time/never won.
2:34 How epic she must've felt that moment... Like a goddess, singing to millions of people in the world... It must be an amazing feeling.
2:50 the powerful moment in ESC
I've heard that next year Abba is going to represent Sweden. Australia is going to answer with AC/DC and Germany is going to shoot with Rammstein. I mean, why not?
Not gonna lie. That would be lit. I'd also add Adele and Eros Ramazotti into the mix. Gotta have the power ballads as well.
Germany would still get 0 points, out of principle alone...
Rammstein would never do that. I don't know who told you this but this is definitely not true. They would never waste their time for this shitshow lol. People didn't even appreciate the talent of lord of the lost, why should Rammstein waste their time there? My country should just waste some rarely known musicians who Sound like everyone else out there.
@@thehellsraven r/wooooosh
@@thehellsraven nah, don't worry, I was just trying to point out how cheap it is to send internationally well know artists to this kind of competition. On a side note though, Germany didn't deserve the treatment they got this year.
I'd rather she remained a successful, beloved 2012 winner than a disliked double winner
Maybe she will think that too😂
I liked her a Lot ❤️
You people are just salty the silly loud dude with a mid song didn’t win.
@@FBl yeahh lol all he was saying was cha cha cha nothing else
@@FBl
There were better songs
Like Serbia, Czech Republic?
The flareup of Finland compared to the indifference of Sweden, moments before the final results says it all
She's been expected to win Eurovision since even before she won the Swedish competition. That's a lot of pressure. And she seems like a sensitive person. Probably just tired.
Loreen, not Sweden! We where not as chilled let me tell ya! 😂
People need to chill everyone express feelings in different ways
She honestly just seemed high as a kite
@@Zakading i tought the same, shees like high af
The Best! This is the song contest,not a crowd hyping contest.Loreen deserved this win! ❤️
Jury points should not exceed the people's given points. There is definitely something wrong if a single piece gains about double points than others and still lose!
True, they were not fair😊😊😊
Who want to win,in eurovision must be lgbt (lesbo gey trans)
Why? The juries come from 36 countries, not from 1. If most of them give their votes for one singer, it means she's really good.
This is exactly the point of Jury. People vote for songs like Solo o Mamma SC, Juries can valorate correctly to Spain, Estonia, Italy and other great songs that people don't valorate.
Drinking koskenkorva? Get over it and go to sleep!
It just seems that the costumes and stage have come to play an important part in promoting the song. Personally I thought the song was so so and similar to some song I heard before.
Yes, I have the exact feeling I heard something like this before; at some way it reminds me of Morandi -Angels, but there is something else like this. Also feel like the song is ordinary
@@alishaavr4598 so true. :)
some bits sound like The winner takes it all, especially at the beginning
Agree with you ABBA song!!
ABBA SONGS RETURNED AT THE ESC 2023.😳👏😬👏😬👏😬👏😬👏😬👏
Loreen it’s not the problem, the juries are and the song contest in general. I am still convinced that the Swedish delegation really planned this out for the 50th anniversary of ABBA. In order to win, this song was created. They chose Loreen, as she is famous and everyone knows that she’s a power-weapon. Tattoo won Melodiefestival because of her. The same happened yesterday. Everyone knew that the song will do good in front of the juries and public
SHE WON FAIR AND SQUARE. GET OVER IT!
@@bigd_selectersmg the coincidences are just too big, its not about "getting over it", it just seems too suspicious and scripted somewhat but nobody can prove it
if the jurys wont exist, it would be easier for anyone to win esc, as the pepole will be voting and its more interessting and more exciting if it exists.
@@bigd_selectersmgGet out of here fool
Is anyone really surprised that a well crafted artistic song and performance had gotten a significantly better jury result than a gimmick fun song that all you remember from is screaming cha cha cha repeatedly?
Even if this is not as good as Mello.. She still destroys every competition.
Not gonna lie, Loreen performance was absolutely beautiful and wished her high notes but I think it is totally unfair that(often biased) the jury are voting and robbing points from many artists. Look how Norway was robbed but it was one of the song with highest points given from public.
And of course the winner was Finland which would be on 1st place if not jury points.
Norway Was Absolutely Robbed Of What Should Have Been A Win . Loreen Was Already Well Known So She Swooped Up All The Votes And Tried To Act Surprised!
Norway hadn't a great performance! I don't know if it was a tech issue or she lost her voice, but she wasn't at her best. She just had a lot of social media fans !
Finland was much better 🎉
Abba won Eurovision again!
And when you consider, that even tho juries gave a highly biased 190 point advantage, Sweden only won with 57 points against Finland.
If Finland won, you wouldn’t say that
Okay I will say this here. Is Loreen an Eurovision legend? Yes. Did I like euphoria? Yes. Did I like the message of tattoo, the staging and performance? Yes, it was amazing. Did I want her to win? NO. Why? Because by sending Loreen to Eurovision there was no room for other artists to win. Too predictable. I said it in the beginning when I saw she will represent Sweden and my opinion hasn’t change. Anyway, i guess congrats Sweden!
Two years in a row the winners were predictable. Let’s see next year, third time is a charm. 😬
Edit: I didn’t say it was a bad song. It was a *great* song + who *she* is, made her victory almost impossible for the others to beat. Which is unfair. Tell me why countries like portugal, armenia and norway with great vocals were completely forgotten by the juries but they all voted for sweden?
Plus, I wouldn’t have said anything about her win if she won the public vote as well. But she didn’t win the public vote, the jury gave her an unbeaten result. So yeah, as said, unfair.
My thoughts exactly! I'm not mad because Sweden won or because my beloved Finland didn't. I'm disappointed because it feels like the winner was decided already in March. I feel like the others never had a real chance.
But still you must to have a good song to win bro ...
agreed. Euphoria was a great hit, but Tattoo just felt like a bleak copy of Euphoria, i didn't think she deserved to win and I'm Swedish. I was rooting for Germany all the time lol
The contest is about choosing the best song... if people are great creators, they can participate endlessly for me!
What message? Tattoo is the most generic radio song in a while. Angles crying violins playing lol! Also the melody is stolen from several songs. Sweden only won to get an ABBA show for next year (ps. One song that was copied to tattoo is abba winner takes it all)
if we wanna put Loreen back on Eurovision, why can’t we do other artists with a full blown career like Ghost?
They can but they chose not too? Same for sweden, we could have hov1 or anyone instead of new people but they chose not to
Nobody is stopping them.... 🤷
@@hakancarlsson2881 I’d love to see Ghost on Eurovision
well, u know who is contester on Eurovision? The one who's bad at being artist.. Non successfully ones
Blue which was famous back in the day, represented the UK and they scored extremely low?
I'm absolutely obsessed with this performance
Sweden performed well, but I don't see the point of sending the same participant (especially one who has already won) for a second time. In addition, the jury on purpose dragged down countries they knew people would vote for, such as Finland, Ukraine, and Norway. And they elevated Loreen so high that even with over 350 votes from the audience, Finland couldn't catch up.
It's an elimination run. You have to win numerous times to even get to the final. It's well deserved
▶️🎸🙋♂️🌸
Everyone can go to the contest. It doesn't matter how many times. It was her choice to perform and she won well deserved
@@oemusikstop with that. Sweden's song was mediocre at best and in no way was twice as better as the second one. But according to Jury Mika New... Loreen's tattoo was twice as good as anything else
@@lyubovvetchnaya1498 🤣😂
I’m not a hater, but the fact that people are so furious about the jury votes, they make petitions, leave tons of dislikes and negative comments that gain most attention even under this video (the winner’s video!) shows that something went wrong…
I mean, there always were people disappointed in someone’s victory, but this year the negative feedback is mind blowing. Note that it targets the juries, not Loreen herself as she’s still a talented artist. ESC, you better do something about the voting system.
Amen. Mods try to delete critical comments on this video (mine was deleted, no bashing there or anything which would break rules of internet etiquette). Makes it seem like people are cheering the winner but the dislike ratio and the negative mood all on social media platforms and on newspapers don't lie.
She is really popular by people outside this community. This song is currently the 46th most played song in WORLD on Spotify. She is charting in many countries.
Among the countries that voted for cha cha TATTOO is charting much better than Käärijä
@@bilaakis how is it related to the contest? People may listen to her song billions of times, she may be the most popular artist out there, I’m fine with that, but ESC voters gave her SECOND place IN THE CONTEST. With a 130 points margin from the public winner. That’s it.
@@olenaolena9073Why on earth are you making such a big deal out of this? The winner has many many times before not won the televote, this is not unique. The rules are 50% jury 50% public, if you don’t accept the rules then don’t participate. Simple as that.
Jury owns us an explanation. The jury criteria were updated this year to have bigger emphasis on "originality" and "overall impression" instead of just vocals. But I feel juries only voted based on the vocal capabilities. I'm not against jury votes. But jury votes should be less impactful than public votes. Jury members should also be a better representation of various musical backgrounds to better represent all of us. Now it feels they are all same anonymous gatekeepers. In addition jury gives scores based on 4 criteria They need to score these criteria separately and transparently so we can see how the final jury scores by country were formed. How on earth did Käärijä not score great jury scores as originality, performance and overall impression are the 3 criteria, not just "vocal capability"?
I got the impression that jury had decided the winner already before the competition started.
Euphoria was masterpiece and one of the best songs on esc. Tattoo is just a good song. Definitely deserves top spots but not a win. Not in a dream and whole audience who watched the show live knew that.
There was nothing better than Tattoo though. I can understand people being upset about a previous winner, but to me nothing beat this last night. This one had me from the first few seconds.
@@layla-dv2kt exactly this feelt like a genuine good song with good vocals everyone else feelt like clowns on the stage with bad vocals
I have no idea how can someone call it a fair win when she didnt receive 12 pts from any country voting. No-one gave her 12 pts and she won. Pathetic
@@flyingdutchman9424 Italy's act was far away from a clown. Beautiful song with best vocal performance of the night. IMO the real winner!!
These songs sound very the same in structure.
Ez egy iszonyatosan szép dal, ami felszinre tudja hozni az érzelmeket mindenkiben. A hangja pedig varázslatos. No. 1 nálam 😊
Only one country walks away with the Eurovision trophy. But plenty more walk away as winners. Many artists who currently charting worldwide
There should be more trophys! Just like Oscars!
@@JustSaying001 That would be nice
Well, there are press, artistic and composition awards
@@EricMachadoRaupp There is? I want to know more about them
@@EricMachadoRaupp yes, 2 won by loreen and 1 by marco mengoni. just shows how pleased professionals are with her win
I don't know why this performance got so many jury points. It was not better than at least 5 other performances this evening that got not even a third of the points.
After the jury voting the competition was basically over.
For voice and energy
@Anastasia It was one of the top 5 performances, but getting nearly twice as many points as the second place in the jury vote seems fishy
The jury vote is corrupt, they decided who would win beforehand.
In the beginning the Finnish narrator kept on reminding viewers that a solo woman singer has only ever won eurovision twice, which was obviously hinting towards who would win... and a returner (+ not in a bad way, ethnic Moroccan, which by winning would make eurovision "more inclusive")
BECAUSE SHE SING 10 TIMES BETTER THAN OTHER ARTISTS AND THE SONG IS VERY EMOTIONAL- DEAL WITH IT !
So next year get 30 or so opera singers belting songs on there and the one with the beltest belt wins.
It's completely unfair that a song completely predictable and identical to the style of euphoria won .Finland was different and a new artist deserved to win .Plus he actually won the televote with a high difference.
cry about it
AGREEEEEE
Euphoria much much better
But loreen is magnetic
I think it sounded like ABBA The winner takes it all 🤔
It's been a year and people still complain about Loreen win, yet this song has over half a billion streans on Spotify and is the one who scored the biggest chart success, so maybe the true "public winner" was this
So true
Loreen really has the ability to convey emotions through her vocals
She is truly a genuine artist. She puts her whole heart and soul into every performance
Its an incredible artist, totaly agree.
yeah. genuine in terms of cheating
Absolutely generic song an lyrics. Yea. Truly an artist, lol
@@brotimwelt Crying after a year is wild
@@brotimwelthow tf will you understand that there are millions of song out there, and it is impossible for one song to not be similar to other songs
Next year ABBA celebrates 50 years of having been in Eurovision, very useful to celebrate it in Sweden. 🧐 Thank you Jury for deciding the winner this year.
Are you saying that right after Ukraine winning previous year because of Televote?
lul.
Wow 😳
I didn't know about that.
So, know everything is understandable.
Rigged
Isn't Eurovisions motto "United by music" though? Sounds a bit silly that a competition is supposed to unite the people, but then 4-5 "professionals" in each country can decide the entire competition. Especially considering how much EBU pushes the social aspect of the spectacle. Still, can't say the wrong song won with the fact you brought up as it's a pretty cool opportunity next year.
The jury has actually decided every year the winner of Eurovision and not only this year.
We did it ❤🎉 She won ESC250 with Euphoria, and Tattoo came second haha!!! QUEEN OF ESC ❤
How convenient that the ESC will take place in Sweden next year; for some reason 2024 will also be the 50th anniversary of ABBA - what a coincidence!
Yeah… that’s what i was thinking…
Loving that
@@dhefish8024me too
In some parts it reminds me of The Winner Takes it All 😅
riggor morris
Jury just wanted Sweden for the 50th anniversary of Abba win
song is pure plagiarism ! she didn't deserve to win !
The burn 🤣🤣
M M A beginning song music , on 0:29, sounds like Abba song The Winner Takes it All.
@@MM-of1vf they are all mostly plagiarism. Cha cha cha is really close to electric callboys song too. Tho i think Sweden didn't deserve so many jury points
@@claudiuprichici4028 Look at the tell me they didnt want her to win ? :P Was her song twice as good as Israels ? :P Cause she got twice as much points from the jury as second one. They wanted her to win cause they knew, 50 year Abba then in Sweden, this means printing $$$$.
2:45 The moment when eurovision was won by Loreen. Amazing energy from the performer.
Raw emotion, raw feelings.......connection of the love
Good joke. "uh hu hu hu hu song" is the most boring ESC winnner from decade
@@prionuscoriarius better than cha cha cha lol
@@sadway502 Well, not according to the public.
@@yvettakollega5791 but its better
So far, no one from 2024 reaches the level of this song and performance. It will be many years until we will see a performance of such a high vocal and visual level at Eurovision again.
Loreen doesn't just create music. She feels it.
She radiates music from her soul.
She is just simply Art
D1 Glazer
If her team had promoted her in the USA, not only would Tattoo have been a hit there, it would surely have been nominated for Best pop vocal performance at the Grammys! Loreen has to debut in US, She deserves to win a Grammy!
bruh u down bad she aint gonna shag you
Her team didn't promote her in the US because her team knew she had to win votes from Europeans to win Eurovision. Ultimately though I think Loreen is content being the official queen of Europe
She's now signed to TaP Music, so maybe she could go places now.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
She won bc of jury votes, finland got more public votes. Jury votes shouldnt affect that much bc how can anyone else win after she received over 300 jury votes.
Why not 300 jury votes if they thought it was that good? It's like saying no to over 300 votes of public...
Yeah, but cha cha cha?public taste is so weird sometimes, come on😄
Jury prefers plagiarism.
@@fuserproducer it might be reaching but I have never heard of any other artist than finnlands... and thats because of a viral tiktok... I'm sure there were lots of ppl that called for finnland because the tiktok was funny
@@fuserproducer That song is very catchy
this song is stuck in my head
stuck to me
LIKE A TATTOO-OO-OOOOOO
Me 2
Pidän kaksin kösin kiinni juomista niikun cha cha cha
383 MILLION streams on Spotify and has sold Silver, Gold and Platinum in 10 countries. Boom.
your problem not mine🤣
Kaarija could never really
@@antonzanarkandand will never.
And they're still talking about how the pUbLiC didn't like her ahahah talent speaks for itself
I would really like to know the rules the jury votes by. Like: Are they voting on a live performance only? Has it to be the exact same one as the audience saw? How are the votes calculated? When does a country announce the jury members? I think more transparency would be a great idea overall. 😊
They’re voting based on the live performance of the jury show, which is the night before the real final
They are voting by which country wants to celebrate the 50 years anniversary of abba's win in 1974 ;)
@@weko6273wrong. They had a show yesterday for the jury and then they voted.
Loreen copied Mika Newtons song Tatoo and next year is Abba 50th celebration. Of course she had to win ! So it was corrupted.
dusty old boring love songs and ballads, what else.
She is also signed with warner bros who support juries in each country
@@RoxyCherryRozy Make sure to pull up käärijä’s pants when you’re done homie.
Scandinavia killed it this year 🔥 Finland, Sweden and Norway Top 3 in the Public Vote 🇫🇮🇸🇪🇳🇴
Finland isn't Scandinavian.
It is lol
@@user-ib2yv6de7j yes it is bud
@@user-ib2yv6de7j bro what
While Denmark is just crying in the corner lol
I liked Loreens 2012 song BUT i cant be the only one who would want someone else to win than her. Also i think the juries votes should be 1/3 of all votes because who da hell even cares really is it best singing technique in the world.
Wtf Bro it's a music contest not a show contest
Eurovision is about music and only music. (Talent, performance, etc etc). If it was about circus or something, i could've agreed with you. Sorry..
I agree with the comparison; I didn't think song stood out from yesterday's line up, not in the way her first winner did that year.... I think the idea of rebalancing the Jury vote to be slightly less important isn't a bas one; maybe a 2/5 3/5
But then I'd like to see the results announced togetehr... Right now, all the Jury votes... then the phone votes In One Go.. doesn't work for me Its like watching the first half of a match.. then going off for lunch and just checking back for the final score
@@micheledipietro9223 IT's a SONG contest and this song is anything but original. It's a generic love song and such a Eurovision clichè entry. And the same artist already won with an almost identical song 11 years ago. The juries don't value creativity.
@@micheledipietro9223 Not really, for years now Eurovision has been all about the Show off, that's why you see such big stage productions. They barely care if the song is actually good, as long as the presence is strong
I really hope for next year’s Eurovision that we don’t have favouritisms towards anyone months before the Eurovision day. Because last year we already knew Ukraine was winning, the same this year but with Sweden. It makes the contest so boring
It was a very correct opinion, I agree
Well then people should stop monitoring the contest months before the actual show. I guess that is the problem, plus the obsession of eurofans with the bookies
contest? heheheh
@@justafella_ yea i like reaaaally love Eurovision but i don't listen to any of the songs and I don't even know the artists until the 1st semifinal so that it's a more enjoyable and unique experience
There’s always been favouritism in Eurovision, I doubt that can change unless they introduce anonymity of countries the songs represent - that would be very interesting if they did that though!
0:29 me when my alarm starts hitting early in the morning and I have to leave my bed.
as I said, once peoples sodium lvl dropped they'd come around on this. 650m streams on spotify later, I think it's safe to say this victory was deserved.
So Sweden’s last two wins in Eurovision came from the jury and not from the people:((
bcs its rigged
Last 3 wins it went second, second and third in televote, is that not from the people?
You guys are acting like she came 20th in the public vote??? She came 2nd in the public vote and is a well deserved winner.
@@cryptidddd no bcs without the jury the competition would suck and kids songs like cha cha cha would win the competition when there are people who actually can sing and deserve the win much more
@@LiasonAlwaysAnd4ever i’m not saying she didn’t deserve to win i’m just stating a fact
No one else had the vibe that Loreen had as an artist. Thank you Loreen for pouring your soul into every performance.
Loreen having two eurovision winners to her name, what an icon 😭💯
She is so magnificent and gorgeous! Her live vocal is so individual and noticeable, I understand why she is a winner!) true winner!
While Loreen is a very good artist with a very good song... as a swede I must admit it is a joke that 200 jury members decide the outcome of this so called contest. It is not the first time, but I hope it was the last. Finland and Käärijä was hands down the true winner. Eurovision better change the voting system going forward. Let each country representative present their tele-votes instead of a so called "jury" vote.
The jury voting is kinda dumb. Most of the time they give points to their neighbors anyway
es el flying free
I think it's so friggin boring with Eurovision these days. Was better back in the day when people actually had some national connection to their country.
No thanks, the competition will be over saturated with green goofballs and joke songs like Finland was this year.
Didn't like the Finland song at all
I suggest ABBA enters Eurovision again next year, and Celine Dion, the year after!
Yes🥳
It's a great compliment for Loreen if you compare her to ABBA and Celine Dion. Thanks :)
Celine can't sing anymore 😢
They can if they want to
@@violinsplaying Why would you get recognition for Loreens behalf? :D
I thought Tattoo was a pretty average song in comparison to her previous Euphoria. I quietly sat listening to her song. Whereas with Finland's Cha Cha Cha my whole family was up dancing and singing to their song. It was so much fun. That being said, I do think Loreen is a great singer and performer.
Who tf asked lmao
@user-jf2wb2xj5y literally the point of a comments section 🙄
Cha Cha Cha is a terrible song
Plagiarism? : Pont Aeri - Flying Free
@@popdoll4377 never have an opinion again
2023's was the best Eurovision for decades. Several songs actually worth listening to.
If past winners want to come back .. we should have one whole Eurovision dedicated to just past winners performing against each other. Make it fair. Someone who has won and has a huge music career needs to give someone else a go. On the plus side, hopefully we get Mans and Petra hosting again !!
Ikr!
eurovision of only past winners competing, reminds me of hunger games...
*Meanwhile countries with no winners*
yeah i think that 2009 eurovision song will win
Many past winners have returned. Hellooo??? Dana International? Alexander Ryback? Carola? That wasnt even long time ago.
all because of the Jury, the audience chose Finland
If That’s the case. Why does Loreens song have 60 million Spotify streams compare to Finlands 22
The audience also chose Sweden... she literally came second in the televote. Also this is not the first or last time the 'Televote winner' doesn't win the overall contest. Literally look at 2015, 2016, 2019, 2022
@@Thjonsson1 are you kidding... We don't count commercial success as votes. We want a system where our votes matter, produce outcomes and aren't just ways for the show to steal money and look more democratic at the same time. All that while the juries can out-veto you enough to push an already established artist over an upcoming artist that will come to loathe this corrupt contest
@@antonisgera please Wake up. Eurovision has not produced any artist since Celine Dion on world stage level. For the last 25 years every winner is forgotten after 6 months.
@@Thjonsson1 because she is already famous and her song got huge on tiktok trend
Bu kadın karşısında Eurovision 'un hiç şansı yok. Tek kelimeyle muhteşem. 😱
Aslında burdaki performansı kötü, vokalleri yıpranmış. En iyi canlı performansı Melodidestivalende seçimlere katıldığı ilk performans
МАМОЧКИ 💥💥🔥🤯🤯😳😳🤭😂😂🤭😂🫣🫣🫣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
She is worthy of beeing winner second time, most worthy! Love to Loreen from Azerbaijan. ❤
Her songs got many wise words, this is one of them.
“You got my heart in your hand
don’t lose it my friend
it’s all that I got.”
United by music divided by the jury 🙄😘
Jury should be eliminated haha
Cry more. I enjoy in your saltiness, biterness and your tears
@@demodexo6742 average loreen stan
It´s as it should be in a competitive, there´s always a winner!
@@2Chor5_13 there shouldn't be the same winner I want a new young winner not the previous ones 😑
Is hurts in my throat when i listen to this song because her voice is so powerful, i just dont know how she does it! All in all really impressive the other songs were amazing this year too
It hurts my head
Euphoria was actually impressive and worthy of the First place, this song - not even close to Euphoria.
The berber people livs 3000 m above the see since 25 000 years (some say) They can dance and sing. Problems solved through the evolution. Their airways, including the nose have made it possible because of evolution. Loreen sings in another way than europeans. Her voice is a bit nasal and very strong because of her background.
@@MD_Production then don’t compare it? It’s not supposed to be the same song
@@evwajarl817 A "bit" nasal? She sounds like a duck.
Damn this is so much better then this year's winner...
Немо мне не нравится но лично мне кажется что эта песня не заслуживает победы
Loreen is an incredibly talented singer and performer. This is an okay song. It's not that she didn't perform well; I would say just vocally, her singing was likely superior to Käärijä's last night. But this jury vote was bizarrely skewed: if it was solely about vocal skill, how on earth were exceptional performances such as Spain, France, and Portugal voted so low? Based on what I can see online, the jury seems to be made up almost entirely of former Eurovision people (my comment doesn't post when I put a link here, but Google it!). I feel like maybe this played a role in the ridiculous amount of jury points Loreen got as someone who is already an absolute Eurovision icon; ideally, her points should have been better divided between herself, La Zarra, Mimicat, Paloma, etc.
Secondly and more importantly, it is SO OBVIOUS to everyone that Finland was the desired winner. Yes, people love Loreen, 243 points through televoting is a lot. But the stadium audience really reflected how many many people felt last night: so many viewers were hoping and waiting for Käärijä to win and end the night by screaming Cha Cha Cha along with him during his encore. It was a unique, original, upbeat song, while Tattoo was just another bland entry. If literally anyone else besides Loreen had been performing it, I'm not even sure it would have qualified beyond the semis.
So, in conclusion, congratulations to Loreen, but her victory feels frustrating. Now I can no longer remember her as "the queen of Eurovision who sings Euphoria " but "the unnecessarily returning champion who won over a song more people wanted to see win".
Yeah and this is really sad. Now I link her to this frustrating victory, not to Euphoria anymore...
I'm not reading all of that. Happy for you though.
Her performance was boring and pretentious. I'm surprised she got as many televotes as she did.
*Everybody’ s talking about the juries ahah. I have a feeling of déjà vu. Well… At least now you know how it feels! That’s why the TRUE WINNER OF ESC 2016 is Sergey Lazarev who won the televote but was dragged down by the juries.*
*GREETINGS FROM* 🇷🇺🪆
To be honest I think she felt the same way, she didn't seem particularly happy with winning, she seemed to be in disbelief, but not really in a good and celebratory way at literally any point after she won. Look at her vs. Käärijä before she won, and Måneskin after winning. She just didn't seem comfortable at any point.
It is a pity that the votes of the jury were more important 🙁
What do you mean?
@@Anton-kn4gxhe means that people voted for Finland and that's true
@@Anton-kn4gx Finland received 12p from 18 countries during televote. Sweden didn't receive any 12p from televote and still won thanks to the jury.
Well the jury is actually made of people that knows music. I would say they should be more important than people voting for bad clown shows
@@Anton-kn4gx well maybe the people should stop watching esc all together, if our opinions are so bad? Only the jury watch it from now, cause everyone else is so dumb
Still to this day get all the chills from this song
I don't know the reason how can someone hate this masterpiece ✨
Loreen is something unique , she opens our souls and fills them with joy, and then she's stuck on us like a tattoo
The voice of this woman is incredible
she is dancing super awesome while she is singing super awesome, the only other person who could do this was michael jackson
@@labohemienne5560 do not compare her to Michael Jackson, there are worlds between them.
@@Brln4087 yes of course, i meant its almost impossible to find artists that can do both, but nobody (exept maybe mozart) can be compared to mj❤️
people were so mad at this winning over the cha cha song ....but Loreen is literally a different class!
Fun fact: Loreen is the first women to get 2 trophies
Fun fact: She didn’t get any 12 points from public. Literally no one chose her outside of jury team
Fun fact: Everyone now is mad at Loreen, because she win. But she got 243 POINTS from audience! No 20, 40 or 60 but nearly 250 points! Anyways, her song is masterpiece!
@@AnnaFresa1 Fun facts: Anna is an insecure troll hater 😉
@@VenusAlabasterFun fact: She is not a hater, she just said what is the turth😉
@@VenusAlabaster Insecure troll hater? Are you even an adequate person? Literally stated the facts, not my opinion.
Loreen is a good artist. They have lots of talent in Sweden!
But I still feel that this song was not as amazing as it was made to look dy judges. It was too similar with some other songs... and jury votes were making impossible gap at the start. It felt like she won because she won with an amazing song long time ago. It really gave me mixed feelings. Not hating for the artist, but bad feeling because of the system.
Groupies be votin’ based on her last performance… it’s not fair to the other contestants… they should not be allowed to compete more than once since their fan base will definitely cast their vote in their direction…. What’s next? Seeing a 26 eurovision winners competetion?! Not to mention the song is plagiarized (abba - the winner takes it all)
Like Redone.
Great singer, but the song was awful and sounded awfully familiar.
Telewotiing is so bad Finand try to cheat by giving Sweden lowe points and Israel non.They knew Sweden was going to win but gave the best oponents low points.Shame on Finland and the and ugly finnish people
Totally agree, 2 times bigger points than 2nd place by judges voting, it's like no other great contestans there... And, ye, definitely Loreen was a top contender in the final.
I think the live version sounds better than the studio version
I find this is the case with most Eurovision songs. They all sound better on stage when the artist is singing their heart out to win. In a recording studio it tends to sound weaker in my opinion.
Not sure about other artists, but this has always been the case with Loreen, she performs with all of her heart and soul on stage, if there is anyone I would prefer to hear live than studio it's her
Well done Sweden Laureen you did it again❤❤❤..we love you stunning you are
,,cause all i want is to be loved" hits hard when you feel unloved by your own parents.
Oh no I’m sorry❤
I'm sure they do love you, but express it differently to maybe how you expect. Please try to look at the positives and enjoy your youth and life. It goes by real fast. I hope you feel a little better soon on the matter.
@@CamEraFitnessChannel they almost don't show it to me.
@@justynazujko7892 Talk to them. Tell them your feelings.
mum saays she loves me, but than doesn't alwaya act like it.@@CamEraFitnessChannel
Another day, another slay. New certification for Tattoo, is a Gold record in Italy for the equivalent of 50,000 copies sold. Tattoo is has been certificated:
-Gold in France, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland and Italy
-Platinum in Greece and Poland.
-Silver in the UK.
We have to be very happy because the Winner Song of Eurovision 2023 is a big hit and that gives prestige, visibility and recognition to the festival.
Congrats Loreen.
Это плагиат. Эта песня Mika Newton, называется она «В плену». Послушай.
@@nataliamoscow7377 no, is not. A song is considered plagiarims when 8 compasses are the same, is not the case. U are you are confusing a harmonic progression with plagiarism.
@@bermerubioизвините, не путаю. Когда слушаю песню “Tattoo”, то голове слышу песню «В плену».
Я даже назвала бы “Tattoo” кавером.) А начало прям один в один. Вы, вообще, слушали песню Мики?
@@bermerubioкстати, вы знаете, что Мика также участвовала в конкурсе Евровидения, но на год раньше, чем Лорин? Она заняла 4-е место. Как вы думаете, Лорин знала предыдущих участников, особенно первую десятку?
@@nataliamoscow7377 si y no hay ningún parecido, sólo el pre estribillo y es porque es progresión armónica, cómo tienen muchísimas canciones cómo Easy on me de Adele por ejemplo. No hay ningún plagio.
Everybody complaining about the jury votes, might not be old enough to remember a time when we only had televoting in eurovision.
They introduced the jurys for a reason. Block voting is a thing.
It's November 2023 and our Eurovision Song Contest winner from May is still making waves across the world.
30 ноября Лорин даст концерт в Латвии в Риге. Я не могу дождаться этого момента. Сердечный привет из Латвии 🇱🇻 г.Рига. ❤❤❤
Yeah but it’s a damn catchy track and she’s giving it all. Hard not to like.
This is not only a song. It’s also feelings
United by music 💚
Divided by Jurys 💔
You act like she didnt get 240 points from the people too lmao, stop being a sore loser
Fixed show yet again
Yessss
@@FabsASMR 👍👍
Divided by toxic finnish fans
Her voice is soo angelic I can’t
Better at melfest tho, theyre just so enhanced and soft, they did a very, and i mean very bad job at mixing in eurovision 2023
Она Сирена. Поэтому так.
Tattoo has now surpassed “Soldi” in streams and is now the 7th most streamed Eurovision song of all time😘
🥳💖
Awesome
And her next stop would be herself.
❤🎉
@@jaersonestera5276Now her next stop is Waterloo and she's only 13 million streams behind it
Loved Loreen in 2012. I could understand the lyrics. Sadly, this song did not have the same range and I could not understand it’s lyrics. Her presentation in 2012 was a novelty, this time, despite the adornments, it was simply an extension of her previous performance.
This is art. Something never seen before. The song is surgically perfect. Also she has an aura, a presence, a talent that is rare to see. So deserving. Now try to sing this well while lying down with your core tight all the time. This is genius. The outfit, her body, abs, nails, hair, lyrics, stage... Everything was perfect and by far the best performance of this year's edition which frankly was lackluster. She had no competition.
@@philippillis9393 Something never seen before??XDxDdxxd This is typical swedish pop, I heard so many song like this
Maybe try cleaning your ears, that usually helps
@@fox08403name one
@@philippillis9393 sorry I can't see her aura, just terrifying nails
I love the apocalyptic alien and dune vibe from this.
It unbelievable that this is live it looks like music video
SO HAPPY FOR LOREEN, BOTH EUPHORIA AND TATTOO CLAIM TOP 2 IN THE ESC250!!! ❤
What is esc250?
@@chaosorder7262its a poll which includes every eurovision song ever which fans vote in loreen won with euphoria 1st and tattoo 2nd
ABBA will be celebrating 50 years in 2024. Of course Sweden had to win and hosting the Eurovision next year.
ABBA PLAGIOUS - BRAVO🤣
This song is a plagiarism of the ABBA song, The Winner Takes It All, yes this song had the collaboration of ABBA.
This song is a beautiful "Copy & Paste", and this is how the Euro LGBTIQ+ song festival is deceived!.....BRAVO🤣😂🤣😅
Eurovision is corrupted
Let me guess, you're favorite didnt win
@@signumcrucis71 ur basicly copy and pasting this same comment in every comment section.
You are an unreliable source 😂
@@mathom4042 Let me guess, you’re swedish
The power of this song combined with her voice is insane.
I want to say something to those who criticize Loreen’s vocals. During Eurovision week, the contestants sing their songs live (rehearsals, technical corrections) almost 10 times. And because Tattoo is a difficult song to sing, it tires the jaw and mouth a lot while singing it. Since Loreen had sung this song many times before the contest and during the week of the contest, her vocal cords were now very tired. If you look at the concerts she gave after the contest, you can see how beautifully she sang. And what's more, she sings the song in here with an ear microphone, not a normal microphone. Anyway she is amazing, and her vocals are unique
Спасибо,Я с Вами полностью согласен!!!
Мало того. Она ведь Сирена, поэтому так всё.