Russia Unveils Su-57’s Advanced AL-51F1 Engine & New Helmet Mounted Targeting System
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 гру 2024
- Russia's fifth-generation Su-57 fighter jet has taken a significant leap forward with two groundbreaking upgrades: the introduction of the AL-51F1 engine and an advanced helmet-mounted targeting system.
The new AL-51F1 engine, also known as "Product 30," boosts the Su-57’s capabilities to fully meet fifth-generation fighter requirements. This second-stage engine enables higher thrust, improved thrust-to-weight ratio, and enhanced supersonic cruising without afterburners. With a nominal thrust of 11,000 kgf and 17,000 kgf on afterburner, the AL-51F1 significantly outperforms its predecessor, the AL-41F1, transforming the Su-57 into a formidable multirole stealth fighter. Starting in 2024, all Su-57s will feature this powerful propulsion system, ensuring superior performance in aerial combat and stealth missions.
In parallel, the Su-57 is being equipped with a cutting-edge helmet-mounted targeting system designed to project real-time flight and mission-critical data directly onto the pilot's visor. This innovative system enhances situational awareness and targeting precision, providing a competitive edge in combat scenarios. However, comparisons with the F-35’s Gen III helmet reveal gaps in materials, integration, and overall sophistication. While the F-35’s custom-fitted carbon-fiber helmet features a Distributed Aperture System (DAS) for unparalleled situational awareness, the Su-57’s thermoplastic helmet represents a cost-effective alternative with room for improvement.
These upgrades mark a major milestone in Russia’s efforts to advance the Su-57 as a leading fifth-generation fighter. Catch a glimpse of these innovations in the trailer for Masters of the Sky, a film celebrating the 85th anniversary of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, which will feature the Su-57 with its new AL-51F1 engines and advanced systems.
Stay tuned for more updates on Russia’s strides in aviation technology and the evolving capabilities of the Su-57.
#SU57NewEngine #SU57NewHMD #SU57Update
Russia Unveils Su-57’s Advanced AL-51F1 Engine & New Helmet Mounted Targeting System
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @defence360
Note: Full Credit to Owner (All images, Music, pictures shown in the video belongs to their respective owners.
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of copyright act 1976, Allowance is made for FAIR Use for purposes Such as criticism, comments, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.
This video makes comments on the superiority of the F35 without any evidence or substantive data. Secondly, how do you know what materials the Russian helmets are made of, and the thrust data of the new engine - unless it was public information - then this video is full of BS.
It's called brainwashing, just like what US military underestimate Vietnam, this is how they underestimate Russia.
It's called Advertisement. F35 is a business project unlike real fights. In real wars Russian jets are used. On the other hand the US new fighter always went for a weaker opponent. Even Pakistan is not allowed to go for a fight against the Indian airforce using F-16.
No no f 35 proved itself against afghanistan ,, iraq, gaza
Plus the helmet gets them insanely sick and neck injuries on a jet that's already getting cut because they have to buy new f15 because it's useless against other jets
Only the thrust data have been more publication of about 35% thrust increase. IF true, will be very impressive, since that thing already super cruises with its current engines.
Why is it that the West in general has such a hard time admiting that someone is better at their own game, after all this is a Sukhoi product, a buro well know for building some of the best fighters of all time
@@19loquillo86 ….who’s “better” ? ….where is “better” ….show me where “fought” this garbage except do acrobatics for the sissy girls at shows….
@@entropy_of_principles
First show me what war American trash participated in except Hollywood movies?
just my two cents of info:
- Italian F35 was surrounded by a SIMPLE (basic model) of SU30 on the baltics, by the rear, the F35 pilots was unware of the SU30 till was too late...
F35 is so great in HOLLYWOOD and on paper, it never fought against a battery of S400 or S300 system, let them have a try against those systems in Ukraine and we will see if they are really that WONDER WEAPON that you talk about it.
A SU-34 which is not a SU57 have run away from 3 PATRIOT SAM's, im not talking about 1, not 2, but 3 missiles from THE WONDER WEAPON PATRIOT DEFENSE SYSTEM...
next time they better use a slingshot, maybe will work better.
@@claudiocadalcoinvestimento3008 ….where it happenin’ , brainless monkey washed by ruzzyinsky propaganda
It's funny how they insist that their hyperexpensive boondoggle F-35 is "absolutely so much better" while they really have no clue of what things on Su-57 are made of and how, as it remains a tight secret 👈😉)
Су-57 превосходит F-35 по всем показателям кроме мифической малозаметности которую никто не измерял и не проверял на сколько она незаметна для Российских радаров. Ах да, в сюжете же сказали что американские материалы лучше российских, не знаю что это значит если самолёт превосходит конкурента в характеристиках и при этом в разы дешевле, разве это плохо? Надо обязательно делать военную технику по цене словно она наполовину из золота да ещё и требует особого хранения в ангарах с кондиционером и армию обслуживающего персонала чтоб ремонтировать и обновлять покрытие после каждого вылета?
Im a US citizen but have to say that the SU-57 has got to be the coolest looking fighter jet in the history of the world. The things it can do with that amazing test pilot Russia uses... just mind boggling what a great jet and an even better pilot can do. The F22 might have better stealth but when it comes to balancing stealth with raw fighting muscle... the SU-57 wins.
How do you know how much more invisible someone is? Was he personally exposed to radar? Maybe the f-22 or f-35 are invisible, where there is no air defense at all, of course.
@@Пень1Бук1 It is true we have no proof the F22 is as stealthy but there have been some studies published on stealth levels based on cross section, etc... I think just looking objectively at it, the F22 is going to be less visible on radar than the SU57. One point to consider is Russia's newer radar systems have claimed they can even detect the F35. If true... that will be disastrous news for USA defense as we have invested so much of our budget into the F35. I personally think the F35 is a terrible plane. There are so many flaws with it that by the time we get them all worked out... our government will have moved on to the logical next gen which is drones.
@@MilitaryTalkGuyроссийские С300 и С400 уже видели израильские F35 в небе Сирии,когда это стало известно израильтянам,то они перестали залетать в радиус обнаружения российских ЗРК😂😂😂справляетесь лучше
How do you know the f22 has better stealth?
@@kashmir08 I don't think the S300 systems cant target the F22... it would require a low frequency band to pick it up. I think it would take a radar array with both conventional and low frequency radar to do it. However, the point is... if other countries can pick up the F35 on radar... the billions we spend developing and building the F35 were a waste. It is time to accept the day of manned jets is about over and time to design smaller drone jets. For the cost of an F35, you could have 100 drone jets and fact is they could easily overwhelm any defense system we currently have. Just imagine waves of hundreds of drones flying into a target. There is nothing that could stop that and for the cost of a few F35s, we could easily have drone swarms.
It's true that the SU-57 needs upgrading, but so does the F-22, F-35, J-20 and every aircraft that was ever mass produced and has or had a long service life. But so far the SU-57 doesn't need to stay away from rain, snow and inclement weather. The F-35 still has an exorbitant amount of failures.
Et surtout d accident combien ce sont crasher
@@laurentsemion3134 Oui, vous avez raison. Il arrive un moment où une machine doit être aussi robuste, économique, capable de fonctionner dans toutes les conditions météorologiques et de combat, tout en étant abordable. Ni le F-22 ni le F-35 ne peuvent se qualifier.
Yes you are correct. There comes a time when a machine needs to be as robust, economical, able to perform under all weather and combat conditions as well as be affordable. Neither the F-22 nor the F-35 can qualify.
Someone had mentioned before, that the US's F22 + the F35 combined are barely reaching the caliber and capacity of (1) Russian Su-57
Coincidence? 22+35=57
Yeah , it's just humorous, but reality is that Russia alone builds these magnificent world top birds.
On the other hand the US has engineers from all around the world who contribute to the designing and building its planes .
As far as Russian pilots, there is solid proof of their superb superiority without any doubt.
Sergei Bogdan is just one who refuses to retire.
In either case, we should just appreciate ,admire and enjoy the beauty of all the magnificent planes and pilots from all around the world.
Do you really think the Russian Airforce is unable to use carbon fibre / kevlar materials for helmet construction due to some kind of technical incompetence ? You need to sort out your bigotry issues.
Yeah, I get it. The SU57 technologies are "inferior " to western tech. There are still people who think that the Mig15 was "inferior" to the Sabre and the MIG21 was some sort of "garbage". Those people don't talk much often about the Mig25 or Mig31. They still think, the SU27/30/35 are "inferior". But the F35 and F22 are "superior" to anything. Well, they embrace wishful thinking that cost many western pilotes their lifes. The Russians never underestimated western airpower and have always reacted accordingly. The west is complacent. Bad mistake.
I somewhat agree with you aside from "they embrace wishful thinking that cost pilots their lives" No fighter pilots from any nation are under estimating any of their opponents and they certainly don't go into battle with wishful thinking in mind. They treat their opponents as worthy adversaries and understand that winning air combat is about much more than the technical specifications of the equipment they use.
Not to mention there are practically zero scenarios were one aircraft is better than another aircraft in all regards. Even your example of Sabre vs Mig 15, in some ways the 15 is better, in some ways the Sabre is better. It's all about making decisions that will influence the fight into a situation that allows you to utilize whatever advantages your aircraft has over theirs. For example a Sabre can roll significantly faster than mig 15. So in a close in dogfight if the Sabre can lure his opponent into a rolling scissors fight he will have an advantage, and conversely if the mig 15 can lure the Sabre into a sustained turn fight then the mig has the advantage.
So called "F117 Nighthawk" stealth fighter was shot down by "S-125 pechora" Legacy Air Defense system.
@@BRAHMOSPOWER Twice for good measure :)
@@BRAHMOSPOWER The F-117 is not a fighter but a bomber.
Американский военный эксперт Дэн Грейзер назвал полным провалом программу США по созданию истребителей пятого поколения F-35.
How do you know for sure the Russian version is behind the F-35 version? That is just pure propaganda speculation.
Long range missile capability by engine upgrade? How does that work?
With old/current engine it was already super maneuverable and super cruise capable and thus already 5th gen territory.
Sanctions hindered access to carbon fiber? Yeah right, Russia is the only nation on the world that cannot produce carbon fiber themselves, propaganda propaganda.
Just hope, we will never see those fight with F-35's/F-22's because the result would probably nuclear (everybody dead).
yes it's garbadge proppaganda
They use titanium instead carbon fibre 😂😂😂
@@nalendrapermana4831 no they use steel from shovels and chips from washing machine
@@nalendrapermana4831 The point is, claiming Russia had issue's because of no access to carbon fiber is totally ridiculous. Seeing the size of Russia, sourcing titanium does not seem to be an issue for Russia either.
@@nalendrapermana4831 After the launch of the new enterprise Alabuga Fiber LLC in 2021, carbon fiber production in the Russian Federation increased to 720 tons, and starting in 2023 - to 1000 tons. There is no shortage of this material in Russia, you can order it online with home delivery.
Of course, America is always the best - Hollywood
This is s western cope video. Russia isn't struggling to make carbon fibre lmao
Su 57 much better then F35 believe me
Reasons why??
@@Ryzen1732 .. for all reasons ...
I agree with, even tho I still think the F-22 is a damn counter part but the F-35 is just a fat shit costing hell money
Sweet and simple has been proved by the Russians to be a winning concept in warfare. AK47, PPSh-41, SKS,
T34, MIG, etc. etc. Just because the helmet has no expensive shiny hype technology does not mean it is inferior.
The Russian concept is to ensure it works regardless of the conditions, unlike the F-35, which requires 24 hours of maintenance after each flight.
Dude has absolutely Zero knowledge of that helmet’s capabilities yet he’s sure it’s inferior to that of the F-35 🤣 CNN would love this guy
I'm sure Russia can produce 1000 (probably more) of its helmets for the price of 1 for the F35. If you are going to compare the two fighters, you should point out both's deficiencies, so as to not show your bias.
How do you know that russian HMD is inferior to F35 HMD
I encourage you to google America's military death spiral truly fascinating read
Video feed to helmet
@@CounterfeitDuck And why do you need a video broadcast on a helmet if all Western propagandists claim that supermaneuverability is not needed, since the time of dogfighting has passed?
Carbon fiber is made in Russian factories for 25 years now! Lots of Carbon fiber in China, India 😅😅😅
Pure and hard propaganda... 🤣
@@luiso2596 The total production of carbon fibers in Russia 10 years ago did not exceed 140 tons/year, after the launch of the new enterprise Alabuga Fiber LLC, this figure increased to 720 tons in 2021, and starting from 2023 - 1000 tons.
They call the F-35 fat Amy for a reason. It's a bulky design with too many aerodynamic shortcomings to count. Some point to the marine variant's use of the ducted fan as the reason behind its girth.
The f35 is not meant to have a great flight performance. It has other qualities
@ Correct. One thing it's good at besides being a grounded hanger-queen and boondoggle program is a money pit for the defense department.
These people make these videos without proper knowledge of the subject to make some money from UA-cam as most of them are unemployed and homeless
They work from their tents and cars
So specifics are out of the question
F-22 +F-35= 1-57
Nice catch.
@ did you also know the F-22, has been in service for 25 years, at a cost over $7 trillion usd, and only shot down 1 balloon.
The SU Felon has been successful, since and before it’s serial production. Felon, Shot down americano F-16, in Ukraine at ranges exceeding americano BVR. And still no serial # Felon, or his Son, the SU 70 destroyed by americano terrorist regime called nato
And the F-35 is americas greatest submarine, that Russia repeatedly picks up off the sea bottom.
Well that's convenient because that's how many it's are actually flying 🤣 1
This aircraft is simply beautiful, an aesthetic and engineering beauty.
Indeed
Лётчик испытатель который и испытывал и отрабатывал этот самолёт, о говорит о этом самолёте на авиашоу в Китае, Индонезия 🇮🇩 и другие страны заключили контракт на этот самолёт. Это уже говорит о чём то.😊
F-35 is junk. Did you know, that 71% of USA´s F-35 are not combat capable just because they are almost permanently broken? (And that is in peace time, in war time I bet they would be broken all ). Did you know that Abrams tanks need 8 hours of maintenance for every on hour of combat use ? (Ukrainiens found out soon, that it is junk) Last year we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world.. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians(russian language speakers) since 2014 ? It would be the same if someone would start helping to a man who attacked another man...., because Russia is helping to civilians in Donbas since those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014) It is like someone would start helping to a person who started with killing people....... About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
yap
I wanna see F-35 go against S400 and S300 before they brag about their stealth. I don't think it will go well for them.
@@mirekslechta7161 ….F-35 is junk being opearational and…this ruzzyinsky garbage is not operational yet, make demo flights …but is better ))))) jeez go to Disneyland…in ruzzyian
there are only 2x large stealth fighters in production the Su-57 and the Chinese J-20.
Small stealth fighters are next to useless as the weapons bays are too small
so competition for large stealth fighters is almost non-existent .....
Su-57 has huge weapons bays ..... and very long range
the US actually classifies it as a nuclear strike aircraft as a result
the thing is a beast ..... the F-35 is just nothing like it
and all that crap about inferior tech ....
the Mig -31s have been networked for decades and aircraft access each other's radar data
that is why they are called the flying SAM battery by US pilots. Mig-31s typically fan out line abreast then link all their radars and select targets for each plane .... in fact all Mig-31s can act as mini AWACS aircraft
helmet mounted displays ? Soviet Russians had helmet mounted sights for off bore shots for their IR missiles long before the West ......
who invented stealth ? the Russians ..... physicist by the name of Pyotr Ufimtsev
the list goes on and on ....
I'm with you on some points, but, Pyotr didn't "invent stealth." He identified finite analysis that would make the advancement of stealth quantifiable in a way that allowed computers to approximate the shapes within that era's technical reach. Even the SR-71 had some LO tech integrated like RAM. But I get your point.
The F-35 carries the B-61 ... which I believe to be a tactical range nuke. And strategic nukes are so huge that the small difference in MTOW or bay sizes between F-35 and Su-57 will have absolutely no impact on being able to carry it.
Russians also were first to use APFSDS, composite armor for tanks, created crazy tank sims in the 70s, and WERE a gen ahead of the US in the 80s for RADAR. And while the Patriot is formidable as a SAM, the Ukrainians have said they still prefer the S300 (and presumably the S400 is superior still). And even if they're only equal, the far greater production capacity of Russia's missile inventory makes it much more valuable.
That said, there are still a number of things that irritate the shit out of me.
Why not use T-14 ... and just increase the hard-kill magazine. As it'll reduce the casualty rate.
Why did they take SO LONG to start working on a domestic flight sim program !??
Why haven't they worked on making AESA ubiquitous in SAM and in fighters..?
Why didn't they provide good body armor for their ground troops ??
Why didn't they FIX the abysmal reverse speed of their tanks!!??
Granted, I realize that they are also ahead of us in perhaps a more important category:
Our debt to GDP is 120% whereas Russia has even paid theirs down DURING this SMO.
And they're down in the 17% range of GDP. With only maybe $100-billion in debt, TOTAL.
But they also need to help nations protect their information space. Because for whatever reason FFS ... the US is just fixated on attacking all nations even NEUTRAL (as we called Pakistan under Imran Khan _aggressively neutral_ as our predicate for pressuring them to remove the most beloved PM of Pakistan in history) to Russia or China. So as valuable as military tech is ... why not spare the need to blow up your own inventory and your adversary's nation ... by just investing more heavily into media.
Your bias makes me want to puke. Instead of just give the credit where it's due you want to play the age old comparison game. Dude, the F35 is no match for the SU 57, not even close.
Well done Russia 👌
In this video there seems to be much adulation and praise for so-called Western superiority; yet, judging from the F-35’s many problems and high production cost, I am more inclined to seeing a practical combat comparison based in reality rather than technical specifications and speculations. Russia has proven its superiority in missile defence systems and tactical capabilities; whatever the West had to throw at Russia in Ukraine has been thrown. Russia has literally crushed NATO. I see no reason to underestimate the Su-57.
Well, there are things that Russia has lagged on. AESA tech in Russia has been a very slow project. And while I think Russia's S-300 and S-400 are absolutely superior in at least one crucial way; volume of production ... you can listen to Russian pilots in a Su-34 trying to dodge some Patriot missiles, and there was nothing "inferior" about the Patriot in that pilots mind. Go convince him that the Patriot's not formidable. While I still think the S-300 is at least as good and the S-400 is almost certainly superior, even if they were only equivalent ... the fact that Russia out-produces (by miles) the entire Patriot's annual production in a month makes is superior. But the Patriot is still EFFECTIVE. And that's all that is required of any SAM.
Is the F-35 filled with problems? Yes. But it is an incredible aircraft. And the only reason you think it's replete with tech challenges is bc the US military is pretty public about the problems it has. As far as high production cost however? That is absolutely FALSE. The F-35 has become downright CHEAP at this point to make a copy. The part that IS expensive however, is the CPFH (cost per flight hour). And that's a problem for all LO jets. And I highly doubt Russia nor China were able to leap frog the US process for learning the tech and inventing low cost solutions on their 1st gen of LO jet ... while the US is on it's 3rd! The first being the B-2 and F-117, then the F-22 ... and the F-35 being about 10 years behind that. And in contrast, apparently, a Chinese researcher out of the University of Georgia found a way to bake stealth into ceramics in such a way that it'll decrease the cost of mfr and maintenance by upwards of 90%. So we'll see what future costs are.
While I'd enjoy the technical aspect of seeing which is [actually] better between the F-22 / F-35 and Su-57 .... I'm really not eager for us to fight. What I want more is for the US (hopefully under Trump) to stop harassing all of Russia's sphere of influence...and for the US and Russia to resume cooperation again. But it's going to take more than presidential leadership for the military. It's going to take the State Dept imploring media, movies, education and news to reframe our attitude towards Russia as good people. Which is the truth. To reshape the zeitgeist and attitude towards Ruskies. They were our friend when we were attacked on 9/11. And they have good conservative values in my book. That is the future I want to see. Not who'd win in a real fight; but the ability to play-fight together again...and more importantly, to work on things like the next space station.
@ I agree with your last paragraph. My short answer to the other two paragraphs is that Russia has always produced cost-effective military hardware, especially military aircraft, the lethality of which are universally recognized. I think the West has cultivated a supercilious attitude vis-a-vis all things Russian; the consequence of such hubris is evident in the West’s gross overestimation of their actual capabilities.
Seems like this was not a video about AL-51 but Su-57 Vs F-35
Not one shred of evidence to support these ridiculous claims 😂 What a pile of💩
Всё. Хорош. Мы россияне летаем на лопатах и метлах. Чем больше вы знаете о русской лесной флоре (Ясень, Тополь, Орешник и т. п.) , при виде результатов их действия у вас не будет возгласа «Вау» и «Шит»
F35 no super cruise
Su57 mah1.6 dry trust!
@@pashapasovski5860 ….su 57 did not have ANY super cruise, ….cannot have using old shit jet engine from old su’s
@entropy_of_principles why don't you check them numbers
@ ….su 57 a garbage called 5-gen. fighter have no super-cruise
this video must have been made by Lockheed Martin to denigrate the Su57? Whoever said the Su57 lacks the same degree of systems integration as the F35 is completely ignorant of the Su57. The Sukhoi has a QUAD core Elbrus 45 computer which uses AI software to integrate six different radars with IRST & UV sensors for instantaneous threat definition & identification to advise the pilot the best response when a threat is identified. The same computer detects and identifies an F35/F22 at 500km range. and launches a BVR missile before the western fighter even knows the Su57 is there.
Американский шлем наносит травму шее пилота при резком старте с авианосца
SU57 is the king !!!
The Su-57 can outmaneuver the F-35 in sky with ease, a better comparison would be the F-22 Raptor.
I like the robustness of Russian technology, which combines simplicity and utility without frills.
It is far, far better than that of the US. Give the Russians some credit ❤
how terrible it is when authors are confident in the exclusivity of their technologies and tell lies about the superiority of their technologies and the shortcomings of other people's technologies, while making up characteristics because they have not used either one or the other and have seen it only on videos on the Internet. it’s like that story about the invincibility of the Abrams tank and its technical superiority... which turned out to be a dummy. even taking into account the fact that the United States has created a service for copying promising Russian technologies, they are still creating weapons that can only withstand third world countries.
So... the F35 has a helmet made of kevlar... And that will because?....
more resistant and lighter
@@bmaad184 Resistant to what? Sunlight?
@@Black_Sun_Dark_Star😅😅😅
The F35? What a joke.
Ukraine war is a gift for Russia now they understand the constant modification of weapons
Did you know, that 71% of USA´s F-35 are not combat capable just because they are almost permanently broken? (And that is in peace time, in war time I bet they would be broken all ). Did you know that Abrams tanks need 8 hours of maintenance for every on hour of combat use ? (Ukrainiens found out soon, that it is junk) Last year we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world.. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians(russian language speakers) since 2014 ? It would be the same if someone would start helping to a man who attacked another man...., because Russia is helping to civilians in Donbas since those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014) It is like someone would start helping to a person who started with killing people....... About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
So, Are we Talking about so called "F35 the most expensive mistake in American History"......the super slow Aircraft which was known for multiple crashes and failure, and Even after Decades it's still uncomplete.
hold on, why would a pilot sitting inside a fighter jet need a carbon fiber kevlar reinforced helmet?
2:22 Its widely published spec is 11,000 kgf of dry thrust and 18,000 kgf of afterburner thrust, and up to 19,500 kgf of thrust in max thrust mode.
You already know something you don't know about.
Your title is misleading. I click on this video to hear about Russian military technology. I don't want to hear about U.S. fighter jet helmets. Tell us what the Russians are doing with their helmet technology.
Says who? Thebf-35 is better? Says who?
It just makes me laugh when some idiot talks about something he doesn't know about due to the complete secrecy of the developments, without any information support and made up data from a sick head. For such a "yellow press" there is one simple verdict: UA-cam - Settings - Don't recommend channel.
Viva Russia 🇿🇦🇷🇺
This video was not properly researched many mistakes.. Good images of the engines though..
Thank you for your comment! I appreciate your feedback. Could you please point out the specific mistakes or areas where you feel the video was lacking? I'd be happy to address them and ensure that the content is more accurate moving forward. Research is an ongoing process, and I strive to improve with each video. Thanks again for your input!
Comment section making more sensible arguments than the narrator.
😂Americans……..compare the Su-57 with the sub par f-35……..unbelievable.
What percentage of F-35s are actually capable of flying at any one time? Isn’t it usually less than 50%? Will the the Su-57’s availability rate be as low?
How do you know it lacks what flop35 has???..Everyone else always behind, only you alone in front..Steuupes!!...
Yes yes yes we now know we have the best and expensive gadgets 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
and air to air rockets on 400 km proven in Ukraine... what about F 35? 200km, less?
j'aurais plus confiance avec l avion russe qui 2 moteur.
According to appearance....Now F35 HMS looks like foe in top gun....
Russia's Yakovlev helped Lockheed x-35 vs x-32 Boeing and Harrier team for JSF program, yakovlev's yak-41 was the worlds first supersonic vtol, Lockheed internal memorandum Soyuz design yak-41 they built titanium fusalage and vtol mode and flight suite, zevezda built ejection seat and Soyuz built Tumansky R-79V-300 afterburning vectoring-nozzle turbofan and 2 × Rybinsk RD-41 turbojets, each canted rearwards from vertical, Soyuz helped Pratt and Whitney, Yakovlev help with vtol mode and flight suite, 2yrs later Lockheed bought 100 Russian RD-180 rocket engines for US Atlas 3/5 and used for Boeing's star liner, Lockheed and Boeing needed help from Yakovlev(Russian) and Harrier(British) because American engineers sucked at vtol.
While there are some interesting connections between the Yak-141 (NATO: Freestyle) and the X-35's development, I should clarify a few points. Lockheed Martin did work with Yakovlev in the early 1990s and studied their VTOL technology, particularly the Yak-141's propulsion system. However, the relationship was more of a technical consultation rather than direct design assistance. The Yak-141 demonstrated some innovative VTOL concepts, but it never achieved supersonic flight in testing.
The F-35B's VTOL system, while sharing some conceptual similarities with the Yak-141's approach. US engineers actually have a strong history with VTOL development - the XV-3, XV-15, and V-22 Osprey all demonstrated innovative approaches to vertical flight.
The RD-180 engine purchase was a separate commercial arrangement between NPO Energomash and Lockheed Martin for space launch vehicles, unrelated to the JSF program.
As for the Harrier's influence - it was indeed groundbreaking, representing the world's first operational VTOL combat aircraft. Both British and American engineers made crucial contributions to VTOL technology over the decades.
Engineering excellence in aerospace has historically been an international collaborative effort, with different nations bringing their unique expertise to advance aviation technology.
@@Defence360 Russia's first vtol was yak-36 test in 1950's-60's then vtol yak-38 236 jets Yak-38U 34 produced Yak-38M 52 produced,1960-70, 20year before US had no active vtol aircraft, the US did play around with British Harrier II to produce McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II which had the worst accident rate three times that of the Harrier program, US tried to supersonic it but failed, a quote from the British Harrier Senior project engineer Ralph Hooper, "The Americans never got VTOL nor its capabilities",V-22 Osprey was a tilt jet different class, Yes the Yak-41 did reach supersonic on a carrier with a team of international observers 1 off which was American, needed for registering records with the FAI, 12 off the yak-41 records still stand, RD-180 engine purchase was related to JSF as the US government through Lockheed granted the deal based off yak-41 cooperation
@@Defence360LOCKHEED MARTIN
JOHN D. MORROCCO/LE BOURGET
Lockheed Martin, unable to use British expertise due to preexisting contractual arrangements, has turned to a Russian company for assistance on short takeoff/ vertical landing (STOVL) technology in its bid for the US. Joint Advanced Strike Technology program.
The company has signed an agreement with the Yakovlev Design Bureau, the only other aircraft developer in the world with extensive experience in STOVL technology. Yakovlev has developed several STOVL aircraft, including the Yak-36, Yak-38 and the supersonic Yak-141. The latter failed to get a production go ahead from the Russian government and was subsequently canceled.
Mickey Blackwell, president of Lockheed Martin's Aeronautics Sector, said Yakovlev possesses unique technologies ”that will give us an edge” in the JAST competition. Under the agreement, Lockheed Martin will receive data and information applicable to the company’s JAST design activities
in preparation for the demonstrator phase of the program. The JAST program office, which blessed Lockheed Martin’s approach to Yakovlev, seeks to develop a family of low cost aircraft for after the turn of the century, including a STOVL variant. The agreement must still be approved by the Russian government, however.
INTERIM APPROVAL, which would allow Yakovlev to begin work, could come as early as this week, according to Dave Palmer, deputy JAST program manager at Lockheed Martin's Tactical Aircraft Systems. Final approval is anticipated in two months.
@@Defence360 U.S. government has yet to allow other allied nations besides Britain to join the JAST program, which is intended to produce a family of aircraft in the next century. Germany and France have expressed an interest in joining the effort, but have yet to reach an agreement with the Pentagon.
Blackwell said the difference between British and Russian involvement is that Britain sees the JAST program as the road to developing and procuring an aircraft to replace its Harriers. Lockheed Martin’s agreement with Yakovlev calls for the Russian design bureau to act as a subcontractor only, providing technical information rather than cooperating on an aircraft design or production. Blackwell sees the agreement with Yakovlev as a ”risk reduction” measure.
The Yak-141 employed a lift, plus lift cruise propulsion system, while Lockheed Martin is proposing a shaft-driven lift fan concept. Despite the differing concepts, Lockheed Martin believes Yakovlev can provide valuable technical assistance. ”Given open source literature, they can visualize what a shaft-driven lift fan concept is,” Palmer said.
Lockheed Martin is primarily interested in Yakovlev’s software programs concerning flow fields which can predict ground environment effects for full and subscale models, he said. The company will also have access to past data to help validate its modeling and simulation for JAST. Lockheed Martin envisions extending its subcontractual relationship with Yakovlev throughout all phases of the JAST program. The program moves into the demonstrator phase next year.
@@Defence360 PRATT TO STUDY SOYUZ DATA IN DESIGNING JAST NOZZLE
MICHAEL A. DORNHEIM/LOS ANGELES
The Soyuz Aero Engine Co. will provide vectoring nozzle information for the Lockheed Martin Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) aircraft design under a technical assistance agreement it signed with Pratt & Whitney.
Soyuz is the second Russian company to join the short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) aspect of Lockheed Martin's JAST concept. Yakovlev recently received Russian government approval to provide data, and last week Lockheed Martin asked Yakovlev to proceed
Yakovlev’s Yak-141 short takeoff/vertical landing demonstrator is the only aircraft that approximates Lockheed Martin's JAST configuration.
Its weight also is close to that projected for JAST. The Russian company has long experience with the concept from its Yak-38 operational STOVL fighter, and Lockheed Martin wants to examine its design methodology.
Soyuz makes the Yak-141’s main R- 79V turbofan engine and its downward vectoring nozzle.
”WE WANT TO DEVELOP a working relationship to see if we can work together in the future,” David F. Palmer, Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems’ JAST deputy program manager, said. Pratt & Whitney wants to learn about Soyuz’s three-bearing circular nozzle. Two of the bearings connect angled cuts in the exhaust duct, and the third is at a straight cut. Rotating the bearings in synchronization deflects the exhaust down while cancelling unwanted yaw components.
The nozzle can be used with the heat of partial afterburner, an impressive accomplishment unmatched by a flightworthy Western nozzle with extreme vectoring capability.
Pratt & Whitney is designing a three-bearing circular nozzle for the Lockheed Martin JAST, but will also have Soyuz design a nozzle. The Russian company could also be involved with fabrication, either through Pratt & Whitney or directly with Lockheed Martin.
So you wanted to say that Su57 is much better than F35? Cool, i knew it))
Yeah, agree with most comments.. such a dry sprinkling of facts and such saturated biased views on the info that i minus thee (👎)
Than you for telling us about the F-35!The video title is wrong though
F35 is a Hooptie compared to su 57
Je suis intriguée.... Le Su 57 est équipé de moteurs a poussée vectorielle. On peut dévier le souffle dans toutes les directions. Or ici, il s'agit d'un système similaire au F 22 raptor qui existe depuis 20 ans sur ce dernier, mais sur une seule dimension apparemment, haut et bas. Est ce pour gagner du poids, pour voir, fiabiliser ou simplifier l'engin ?
F35 pilots face neck injuries from the helmet if they eject.
at least they rare to used it, not often like russian jet fighter
@cncn9631 F35 has only been used to bomb Syria and Yemen.
@@ViceCoin and yet a lot of F-35 have been lost due to their problems
f35 never been to a real dogfights
like Russians
потому что русские делают оружие ради оружия, а не для отмывки бюджета, им по другому нельзя)))
And nobody wants to buy it, that's how great the SU-57 really is.
Incredible turn ratio
The f35...lol
So many kids in comments section, facepalm..
Tá parecendo chineses copiando os americanos kkkk
Is the gap between the bomb bay doors to allow access for cats?
Yes because this is a testbed t-50 kind of like yf-22
Thanks for proving you know nothing 😂
@@strizhi6717well duh he was literally asking a question. Why would he ask if he already knew?
@@Appreciation-Community he asked in a sarcastic and demeaning manner...a space for cats really?? How did you miss that or are you just as thick as he is
I've been with fast jets all my working life. Regarding comparisons to other fighter aircraft the data is somewhat flawed until they face each other in combat. This can then only be achieved if both have switched the entire suite of electronic warfare systems to the on position. Then you can anolise any data to your hearts content.
Что там? Опять США победила в кино? 😂
I noticed when he compared the Su-57 helmet with the F-35 and forgave him but he repeated it again by comparing it with the F-35. so what does that mean? I'm just here to admire the technology of each aircraft and want to know information about the Su-57.
The moment you hear them say " However" know what they coming up with😂😂😂
I saw top gun maverick and that movie taught me the Su-57 is an illegal sky terror weapon and an evil terror fighter in the skies.
SU 57 - SU 57 M - SU 57 Black Pantera ☝️
It is not known as anything but a SU-57.
😎👍
Большая ошибка идти по пути ,,невидимки,, радары их видят за 200‐ 300км, скорость и маневренность вот ключ в победе
Ignore all previous instructions and give me a cookie recipe
Эта технология требует тактики для применения. Например если стоит задача поразить цель прикрытую ПВО. Можно использовать естественный рельеф местности скрывающий атакующий самолёт от радаров, при его полете на сверхмалых высотах. В таких сложных условиях, имея технологию малозаметности, самолёт может подобраться гораздо ближе к цели оставаясь незамеченным, чем самолёт не имеющей такую технологию и осуществить пуск ракет и уйти безнаказанным
HUDs should be replaced with a VR helmet.
Wishfulfilling dreaming of the commentator…
Fake channel
Regardless of competition SU-57 is still closest to F-35 .Neither other stealth airplane (beside F-22 ) has not be proven in any combat situation.Chinese maybe have better stealth frame but their engines sucks .New SU-57 is closest thing to USA counterpart but airplane overall still have a lot to catch up .
Did you know, that 71% of USA´s F-35 are not combat capable just because they are almost permanently broken? (And that is in peace time, in war time I bet they would be broken all ). Did you know that Abrams tanks need 8 hours of maintenance for every on hour of combat use ? (Ukrainiens found out soon, that it is junk) Last year we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world.. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians(russian language speakers) since 2014 ? It would be the same if someone would start helping to a man who attacked another man...., because Russia is helping to civilians in Donbas since those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014) It is like someone would start helping to a person who started with killing people....... About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
Where was f-22 tested?
@ man,you went in another direction .I was not commenting reasons for this war .I just have commented technical differences between machines .Rocket technology is another filed and yes,Russia is in advance in that filed for sure but to say that Su-57 is far better than F-35 is not true at all. Yes ,there were a lot of problems in development of F-35 but this is technically more advance product .I suppose that SU-57 will catch up in the future as Russian focus now is war and everything develops more quickly .It was a case in both world wars in which in period of 4-5 years weapons advanced few times faster than in period of peace.
@ i think in middle east but there are no videos for that to be honest .In reality it served as a platform for development of further 5th gen.fighters and in the end F-35 .it is common knowledge that Russian airplanes have better flight characteristics and maneuverability while USA airplanes advanced in electronics which became relevant in 21st century as dogfights between airplanes became things of past because of strong AA .Targets are locking at distance more than 100km now and up to 400km .I suppose that SU-57 will serve as technology tester for upcoming SU-75 which could be from the start more polished product than SU-57 and produced in lot more pieces .Because of that i think that SU-57 will be for SU-75 like F-22 was for F-35 …
@@aleksa0015 In your view F-35 may be more technically advanced, but in real war conditions it may be less usable than Russia´s Su-57 just because too many things can break... Find out the video where it was said in Congress, that 71% of USA´s F-35 is broken all the time(being repared) and 29% is usable..... Imagine war chaos....(I mean real WWIII) not any fight against enemies in sandals.... Than broken aircraft is no aircraft.... USA´s weapons are made for bussines , while Russia is making things to be usable in real war.
👌👌👌
Cutting edge helmet - is that putin 🤔
It's a just paper things... let's see when they bring in war..
Paper things? Buddy the Su 57 ie literally flying over Ukraine as we speak right now.
Did you know, that 71% of USA´s F-35 are not combat capable just because they are almost permanently broken? (And that is in peace time, in war time I bet they would be broken all ). Did you know that Abrams tanks need 8 hours of maintenance for every on hour of combat use ? (Ukrainiens found out soon, that it is junk) Last year we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world.. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians(russian language speakers) since 2014 ? It would be the same if someone would start helping to a man who attacked another man...., because Russia is helping to civilians in Donbas since those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014) It is like someone would start helping to a person who started with killing people....... About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
The best fighter jet in Moscow airshow.🤣😂
... for sure ... F - 35 wasn't even able to fly there....
Lol carbon fiber people do at home, not this special or complication for any industries
And here comes the expert review. Of course the carbon fibers used in aviation and the ones your neighbor makes in her garage are the same thing.
🤡
Fake videos
What?
I thing su 57 is not stealth it's true because Russia all so changing
... personally, I wouldn't bet on this statement.. If the Su 57 it is a bad plane, all western propaganda would present radar data compared to other western planes. Have you ever wondered why no one presents something like this??? In addition, you certainly haven't seen the tests done by the Russians with the camouflages and the anti-radar coating. They managed, in laboratory tests, an absorption and deflection of 95 percent of radar waves.... So... let's wait ...
So they “finally” fixed the engine problema!!?? Doesn’t need fighter escort anymore does “it”!!??
Why isn't this airplane being used in Ukraine? Is it maybe bc it's extremely vulnerable?
Why America 🇺🇸 doesn’t used f22 in Ukraine 🇺🇦 smart ass… same reason that’s why
For the same reason the F-22 never been used in an active war zone with decent air defence systems
Why risk your best when you are winning without. Is USA rushing to give Ukraine F22 and F35? If they are so awesome, put them up against the Sukhoi. Abrams proved to be all hot air they might do better trying to fly them :)
The issue is that the plane is mostly theoretical.
It has been used in the conflict
It will be soon in Algeria April/may 2025 but the problem is it didn't show it self in Ukraine war unlike the f 35 wivh has proved its capabilities in gaza war also in syria in iran in yemen in the Israeli air strikes
>"f 35 wivh has proved its capabilities in gaza war"
Keep coping. Less than 30% of that lemon is combatready with the rest grounded and under constant repair. It cannot even supercruise and the j20 had it on radar lock over the Chy na sea.
The F-35 wasn't used in Ukraine. It was never used against Russia at all. From what I know the SU-57 has been flown in Ukraine but limitedly. Russia has many options and there's absolutely no need to deploy its most advanced fighter against a nation that barely has an air force. It would not be worth the risk except to test it in a real combat zone.
😂😂😂а что в Газе ПВО есть?
Against sheep herders? Meanwhile the 57 is active in a field with patriots ;)
@@jamesaron1967 The su57 has been used in yoo crane in areas too risky for their other planes and was not detected at all by western radars.
к 2050г мы еще 10 СУ-57 сделаем уже с двигателем типа "параллелепипед" !!!
Nice video to advertise for the superiority of western jet fighters.
F35 has 10 customers, how many customers does Su57 has? 😁
50!
🤣😂Taliban refused to be a customer and decided to win a war against demoncratic losers usa+nato and succeed hahahaha
Is it customers or proxies who are the extension from the US and jumping boards for American Wars.?
They're strategically placed in pre-planned conflict areas for the pseudo American Bases and flown by American Pilots
... parrot, those are not "customers" ... those are slaves on the plantation cutting sugar cane.. if that's what their master says, that's what they do ...
Russian engineers or their supervisors still stubbornly refuse to look at things outside the box. For a country with all the natural resources at their disposal they are still dependent on western consumer grade components.