Thank you for this explanation. I think their is a dire need for a lecture on soviet wage system to get a better idea on what actually happens under socialism.
Just to give you a glimpse Govt had monopoly over everything it did start well in the beginning but when govt started interfering too much in individual's lives the system broke on its own.
@@aftabnaveed sorry I don't agree with that. If all of that were true then more than 70% percent of the soviet population wouldn't have voted to keep the union in the referendum. Their was enough liberty in the workplace for everyone to contest, vote and give their criticism. This is well recorded by neutral historians who had travelled the soviet union. In my knowledge as far as the wage system is concerned, then it was either piece rate system wherein a base salary was given upon completion of the qouta and additional incomes (in a progressive manner) were given based on the extra work/ productivity they gave in. 60-75% of population worked under this. Secondly, the rest mostly were the time workers; they received incomes based on their time in work process individually. Also, people with better education progressed much rapidly than the others. So it is a myth that under socialism everyone would get the same incomes.
@@aftabnaveed this is American propaganda which was used to disenfranchise socialist movements in the the western world and steer away people from belief in a people led and directly involved government. This is well documented in accounts Anna Louise Strong
For many years we were made to believe that food shortages were things that only happened under socialism, and that capitalism was superior in providing plenty and plenty of food.
بہت اعلیٰ تجزیہ ۔۔۔ بڑے گھمبیر معاملات بڑے آسان عوامی انداز میں پیش کئے جو واقعی عام زندگی میں سانجھ کی بنیاد پر استوار نظام معشیت اور سیاست میں درپیش آتے ہیں ۔۔۔ آفرین تیمور رحمان
Access to public goods will be equal. But trader can own costlier wrist watch. Ordinary worker will have a cheaper. After enjoying equal free access to public goods and services each one can have unequal personal yet insignificant items for personal use based on differential personal salary etc.
This video is very much appreciated and I hope you go on to address other reactionary talking points like -money motive is the only way to innovate -heirarchies are natural -people will become lazy -the reality of communist nations(clean up the cold war propaganda) Keep up the good work and I hope this channel finds success in the Pakistani people's consciousness.
The first reactionary talking point you mentioned can be debunked by pointing out the innovation is USSR and Cuba. And China too. Money often is not only not the motivation for innovation, it is often an excuse to keep the status quo. That is why US keeps sliding more and more into oil and gas consumption. They don't have the motivation to move to renewable energy like, for example, China.. Look at Cuban healthcare innovation. No profit motive involved and they have so much blockade from US but they developed vaccine for cancer, 5 different covid vaccines, etc etc
Socialism is excellent system on Paper but practically it leads to state's dominance in economy which leads to ineffective society, with slow to nil progress in innovation.
@@Suqrat400 I just want you to consider the fact that Russia went from being basically a rural feudal state pre-revolution to competing with the world's largest superpower and winning the space race in the span of a bit over half a century. If that isn't innovation and massive progress I cannot tell you what is. Most of your so called innovation comes from publicly funded technologies that companies then patent. As for being lazy you can see how in the modern era production has gone up but work hours and wages remain stagnant. The goal of innovation isn't to make people work forever but to make our lives easier through technology. You can find extensive discussions on the topics I mentioned above if you want.
@@moazhanif5221 you misunderstood my statement. I mean to say that all of those are knee jerk responses and are very easy to debunk. You'll find those points parroted by the majority of people opposed to criticisms of capitalism.
Thank once again for your excellent talk and busting some of the myths that anti Marxism spread. Although I do not follow Urdu completely but I do get the main gist of your talk. When is your next talk? Best of luck. I see the machine workers for a foreign international company in Islamabad iar are being denied their promised bonuses. Could you cover workers exploitation and what can they do about it in the existing legal frame work in your next talk and make it available to the wider working classes.
Thanks for a great podcast. It has been very informative. I just wanted to ask a question. What would incentivise a person to work harder in a socialist system? Can they move up the ladder if they improve their skill set and
As a potential entrepreneur, what is incentive for me to upgrade from SME to a giant and group of companies if a/c to you at 10:34 such resources will get adapted by the society(govt). Just like Bhutto regime's Nationalization Drive in 70s? Can a nation prosper finncially if its potential geniuses doesnt have the right to own the prospered version of their business??
Sir ek sawal hai competition between individuals or companies progress ki taraf society ko lekr chalti hain, jese ke investment in new startups or businesses jis ke natijai me hmari society as a whole taraqi krti hai, agr government ke under cheezain kia us surat me dunya me fortune 500 jesi companies exist krpai gi woh individuals jinhone technology or health ke sector ko agai barhaya, Jese abhi recently Elon Musk ne twitter buy krke uski inner working ko opensource krdia hai or google jesi company jisne recently ayse algorithms pr kaam kia jinse DNA ke structure ko predict krske taqai beemario se bacha ja ske phle hi. To socialism ki surat me kia ye sb progress mumkin. Is pr ek agr ap detailed video krske to bht acha hoajega. Thank you
I have a question, What does the Marx and Engel talk about the lands and assets which are not part of means of production? Like, buying assets in the form of land and other commodities?
If it helps in the soviet constitution, any anti-semite, anti-religious activity we’re considered grave crimes, specially in the former as any anti-semite activity were met with death penalty
Very powerful explanation bro! But unless all the people accept the socialist ideology as their ideal it is very difficult to implement it in society, as we know law can not be kept by force alone but people need to have a basic conscience about good and bad. Also I think it is sometimes hard to convince people to the socialist ideology. Shall we stick to the democratic way of bringing the change. What strategy do you prefer?
Dr Sahab, how do you determine the quantity of commodity required? Without prices giving the information on what to produce more and what to produce less how do you figure that out in a socialist society.
Janab Taimur Rehman, i like your videos and love you as well. I have request: Friedrich Nietzsche is one of the complex philosopher. It's hard to comprehend him reading his books. I request you to make some videos to present his complex ideas in a more comprehensive way. I believe that you can do it in best possible way.
Can some one explain me the difference between Shah wali ullah's school of thought that is still be preaching in a part of society, and karl max school of thoughts? Do they have any similarities? What points of Shah walli ullah's concept contradicts with Marxism concept? Please sir let us have a lecture on this. Thank you
Shah waliullah presented the concept of socialism that he mentioned as "Muaashi Adal" before anyother such concept being prevailed during the Mughal Era. Shah Waliullah's Teachings are according to asian conditions. It is based on Human Nature and Marx's philosphy is based on materialism. They don't condradict each other. They were presented for different conditions.
Thanks Dr Sahib for these educational videos , I have a question, I like the idea of socialism, can we achieve the same with free market/capitalism by taxing and regulating the rich, and investing that money in social welfare programs, healthcare, education etc.
sir in school of thought ku pakistan ka koi religious sect accept krta hy..ya kisi bhi islamic country me koi sect accept krta ho k ye thoughts islami school of life sy agree krty hn.....
sir niji malokiat agar khatam hojai to Malik to goverment ban jai gi or bahat tax lagi... julm to phir bhi hoga abhi bhi sale Tex 17person ha or people ko kia milta ha garib martaa ha
In such system the sarmayadar and jagirdar won't be completely abolished. They'll be replaced by the almighty government. For common people, dealing with petty samayadar and jagirdar is difficult as it is but they have a choice. Imagine dealing with the government, it's dictators, their standing army and will to do whatever they want and people with no choice to escape. No thanks!
@Waqas Gulzar who'll guarantee that the govt will treat people with equality? If a leader elected in one party dictatorial socialist system discriminates against one minority group or another what will you do? Another revolution?
@Waqas Gulzar In capitalist democracy everyone is equal in the eyes of law. There are laws for anti discrimination and govt cannot treat people differently. Most people who benefit from social welfare programs don't contribute anything towards those programs in terms of taxes, hence your assumption that govt treats people depending upon their financial background is mere nonsense. Have you ever lived in a successful western democracy? I guess, not. You should visit and live in a western democracy for some time and experience first-hand instead of talking from your backside, sitting in a failed corrupt state of Pakistan.
Sir you may clear it that If we discuss capatalism and Communism in first and second world countries both are developed like in Europe and America there is capatalism but developed and in Russia and China there is almost communism they are also developed. But this issue rise only in Third world countries?
Sir what do you say about jamshed Dasti's press conference? Want to know your take on this. Is he a pro socialist? Kindly make a video on current issue.
Sorry Dr. Sb, totally and strongly disagree with what you said in this video. 1. Why is it assumed by Communists that all Capitalists are greedy? Many of the Capitalist Billionaires donate Billions of Dollars to different charities. Warren Buffet (Greedy, Selfish Capitalist and one of the greatest investors worth $100 Billion) has donated more than 99% of his wealth to several charities after his death. Recently Word Food Org asked Elon Musk (Wealthiest Greedy and Selfish man in the world) that if he give only 2% of his wealth ($6 Billion) they can end world hunger. Within weeks Elon donated $6 Billion to World Food Org. I can list many more examples. 2. No Capitalist says that in a Communist regime, every one will have the same salary, it's just simply goes against "Common sense" - how can a doctor and janitor salary be the same? 3. Capitalists argue that Communism kills incentive to work. In other words it "disincentivizes" work. You can see this in the large public sector entitles (PIA, Railways, Pak Steel etc) run by govt and incurring billions of losses every year, where workers say "Sanoo ki, sadi nokri tay paki hay". They have the incentive Not to work. 4. I was shocked that you mentioned Na-Pak Army (Most Corrupt Army in the world) run entities. These entities are rife with corruption and a parasite sucking the hard earned tax money of people. have you ever seen any audit reports of these entities? Their losses are simply covered by our tax money. By the way they also run DHA and Bharia. town A by product of these corrupt Na=Pak Army run entities are Papa John pizzas (just a tip of the ice berg) and many more to be revealed
You are just another victim of capitalist propaganda. Communist don't use the word "greedy" To define capitalist. You exposed yourself then and there. And as for the donation, I am 100% sure you don't know that it is just a method to avoid taxation. By creating a subsidiary of their own company and donating to it, their net taxable income is reduced and the money they donated is never used. In 2018 or 2019,it was estimated that bill and melinda Gates Foundation just used 5% of the amount for charity work since 2010,even though the amount allocated was in millions. I can explain dozens of other economic methods and practices, these capitalist pigs 🐷 use to loot the working class and avoid taxation.
The net taxation rate for Jeff Bezos in 2018 was 0.2% . And Elon musk didn't pay any taxes for 2 years straight. Both got huge government contracts, subsidies and bailout. Amazon space program went into a loss and congress brought up 10 billion dollars bailout package for it. You can look that up if you like.
Means of production requires motivation and when you start equally distributing the means of production, people who work hard loses that motivation which then kills competition and killing competition creates monopoly. And the worst the govt has monopoly over the means of production and too much govt kills the productivity.
Mr taimoor as you have mentioned the precolonial agricultural policy in subcontinent which i have read about. But you didnt mention that it was not any kind a socialist policy in nature and origin so let me mention here that it was a sharia (islamic) prescribed policy implemented by the muslim rulers.
Sir I have 2 questions, Why most of communist countries convert to capitalism like China ,they just have name communism although it's economic system is pure capitalistic. And how we bring competition if means of production become public because most govt are mire on try to provide instead of bringing new products for example we don't have that much of products if capitalism doesn't exist How do we have internet and companies like Starlink who aims to provide internet through satellite all over the world, most govt can't afford this high investment and rich countries invest in it they impose condition on countries who receives service and have more power over that country, but the capitalists just aims for profit no other conditions as a comparison. Aren't the Mixed Economy reduce the class difference and are more effective than both capitalism and socialism?
Your lecture is excellent but status co is so strong because of its persistence since its inception, I feel pain how we could get rid of this rotten system.
Sir Mera aik sawal hai ke aaj Kal yeh bhi bat horahi hai k duniya may communism lagne jaraha hai aur hum sab ko slavery may Jana Hoga aur humare basic rights khatum hojaye ge ...Kya yeh sab Sahi hai???
सर मार्क्सवाद में पुंजीवाद की तरह समय के साथ परिवर्तन नहीं आया है। और आया तो मार्क्सवादी इसे सामने नहीं ला पाए हैं। मार्क्सवाद को भी एक John Menard Keynes की जरूरत है
But how is it going to uplift our economic condition, that’s really required. Please elaborate on how the economic system will work? I understand that if class system is abolished, the element of exploitation will be eliminated but then again, how will it elevate the living conditions of the family who is living below the poverty line?
Communists say "Democracy is a tool of capitalists used to preserve the capitalist system", how much do you agree with this statement? Do they take advantage of democracy or they just prefer democracy over autocracy (as a general rule) in modern age? Do you see any possibility communism can win, grow and function well in a democracy? Thanks in advance.
Sir some people try to distinguish Socialism, Capitalism and Communism. For example, they say that socialism is a soft version of communism (Dr. Munawar Sabir). Another example is that communism favours dictatorship while socialism favours democracy (social democracy)... Some people use these three words (Socialism, Capitalism and Marxism) interchangeably. Sir please tell us whether there is any difference among them or not. Thank you.
don't ask him for marx socialism and Communism are the same think if you read him you will notice that marx uses both words interchangeably Also Marx, never said communism to be an alternative system to Capitalism he saw it as a movement which is beyond Capitalism, like how Capitalism (and the many struggle against monarchism caused it) was beyond Feudalism. For marx Communism would be a fundamentally different by core, it won't even have commodity production or money. Marx never made a blue print on how so called communist society would look like (hence the confusion) he was more interested in the functions of Capitalism (hence his main book is called CAPITAL: critique of the political economy, and was not called COMMUNISM: How to make it) and society in general. while thinking that the fall of Capitalism (mode of production, in which commodities, Free market and private property for expanding capital is the norm) would be caused by the working class movements (note by working class, Marx meant anyone who earns a wage meaning both so called blue and white collar workers). Marx also saw Capitalism to be an important step before communism, as it helps in industrialisation. For Marx communism/socialism (he used them interchangeably) isn't when government does stuff, it isn't even government controls properly and it isn't even government controls commodity import, export and production ie it isn't when government does capitalism. Marx views state property just to be private property of the state. He views that, if the state is the one controlling commodity production then it is state-capitalism not socialism/communism. Marx and his friend Engels, made fun of social democrats who only saw socialism just when government controls stuff. "Marxists" are the people believe in "Marxism" ( Marx theories ), however marx himself was against the word as it glorifies him. Engles his best friend said "Marxism" is the worst thing ever happened to Marx's work. Marx wanted his work to be the the steeping one for a new form of science. A science doesn't the anaylsis the natural but rather the social world basically what we now call social sciences/sociology. Marx's science is different than others as he believes the world and only be seen in connection in one another.
So, in socialism, if the means of production aren't owned by capitalists, who owns it then? Is it owned by the state? or by workers? or by the community? Which community? Or by the entire population of a country? I mean, in Pakistan, if there are 24 crore people and only 3 crore acres of arable land, so these 24 crore people will own collectively 3 crore pieces of land? What happens with the profit of the means of production? Does the state take it? Or is it divided equally among workers? Or the profit is again invested in making the means of production better? If the means of production are owned by the state, isn't it risky if some kind of crazy person sits on the throne and tries to use it for his personal benefit?
@TairmoorRahaman سر تو پھر ریاست کو فوج کے ہی حوالے کر دیا جائے نہ اگر فوجی ادارے نان پروفٹ ہیں ؟ دوسرا اگر کوئی جاگیردار نہیں ہوگا تو ذرائع پیداوار تو یقیناً حکومتِ وقت کے پاس ہوگی، سر کیا اسلامی نظام اسی نظام کی عکاسی نہیں کر رہا اگر اسے حقیقی طریقہ سے چلایا جائے ؟
Also sir, it is strongly believed that capitalism promotes innovation and eliminating free market will destroy the potential that arises from that healthy competition and ownership of capital by individuals.
Good point bro! This is a major plus for capitalist society. I think a communist state will always lag behind a capitalist state in terms of science, technology, innovation and market because capitalist system's greedy nature of leadership is very powerful than the responsibility oriented work force in communism. A communist state will need to isolate it's population from capitalist state in order to keep them loyal to socialism with the outdated state of science and technology as compared to the capitalist state's.
Yesterday I was talking with my dad . He spent sometime in Russia so we were discussing Russian life . It was shocking to me because everything was in the hands of government . There was no private business even though the restaurants and barbershop was running by government .
Imagine the scale of corruption when Govt owns every bit of your life. They interfere and tell you what to do and what not to do. Imagine you living with a conscious but not unable to use it to exercise your freedom.
No wonder Soviets collapsed. It cannot exist in this day and age. Sure there should be social equality but you can't stop one working hard and making more compare to someone who is lazy or out of ideas.
اس پر یہ سوال ہے کہ کیا اس کا نتیجہ یہن نہیں نکلے گا کہ ذرائع پیداوار کا مالک فرد کی بجائے حکومت ہو جائے گی، فرد کی بجائے افراد کا ایک گروہ ہو جائے گا۔ آجر اور مزدور کا طبقہ پھر بھی ختم نہ ہوگا۔ استحصال پھر بھی ختم نہ ہوگا۔ حکومت مزوروں کی بھی آ جائے گی تو اس کی کیا ضمانت ہے کہ وہ گروہی مفادات قربان کریں گے؟
Hm, interesting concept but the practical implication is vague. I mean the most important element to consider here is the drive... I think the drive to advance in the modern world is directly linked to the reward which in almost all cases is more profits. With Socialism in place, how would you incentivize the people to put in 16-20 hours a day if they are expected to work 9-5 only. And all technological advancements have been made by people going above and beyond their 9-5. Also, if you have worked in a large company, you might know how bureaucratic the environment is and the last thing you want to do is to give its ownership to the entity that's known for its bureaucratic flaws (Govt).
Honestly speaking, I think humanity never demand for progress (health care excluded), everyone is happy today unless something new arrives tomorrow today's world will not lose it's charm. World seemed much peaceful place 20 years ago too. But yes, the progress gap between capitalist and communist states will result in people losing interest in communism, because as human we value hustle bustle of technology more than peace of mind. 🙂
Thank you for this explanation. I think their is a dire need for a lecture on soviet wage system to get a better idea on what actually happens under socialism.
Just to give you a glimpse Govt had monopoly over everything it did start well in the beginning but when govt started interfering too much in individual's lives the system broke on its own.
@@aftabnaveed sorry I don't agree with that. If all of that were true then more than 70% percent of the soviet population wouldn't have voted to keep the union in the referendum. Their was enough liberty in the workplace for everyone to contest, vote and give their criticism. This is well recorded by neutral historians who had travelled the soviet union. In my knowledge as far as the wage system is concerned, then it was either piece rate system wherein a base salary was given upon completion of the qouta and additional incomes (in a progressive manner) were given based on the extra work/ productivity they gave in. 60-75% of population worked under this. Secondly, the rest mostly were the time workers; they received incomes based on their time in work process individually. Also, people with better education progressed much rapidly than the others. So it is a myth that under socialism everyone would get the same incomes.
@@aftabnaveed this is American propaganda which was used to disenfranchise socialist movements in the the western world and steer away people from belief in a people led and directly involved government. This is well documented in accounts Anna Louise Strong
For many years we were made to believe that food shortages were things that only happened under socialism, and that capitalism was superior in providing plenty and plenty of food.
@@shaharyarsabeeh7666 The same income idea is impossible since skills differ,and consequently,payment.
great sir..... india is also listening you.
thanks for explaining in very simple way.
Sir very well explained. Our society needs intellectuals like you.
بہترین جواب دیا ھے کامریڈ آپ نے ۔۔ اس سے بہتر نہیں ہوسکتا۔
بہت اعلیٰ تجزیہ ۔۔۔ بڑے گھمبیر معاملات بڑے آسان عوامی انداز میں پیش کئے جو واقعی عام زندگی میں سانجھ کی بنیاد پر استوار نظام معشیت اور سیاست میں درپیش آتے ہیں ۔۔۔ آفرین تیمور رحمان
"It's now easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism"
Access to public goods will be equal.
But trader can own costlier wrist watch.
Ordinary worker will have a cheaper.
After enjoying equal free access to public goods and services each one can have unequal personal yet insignificant items for personal use based on differential personal salary etc.
This video is very much appreciated and I hope you go on to address other reactionary talking points like
-money motive is the only way to innovate
-heirarchies are natural
-people will become lazy
-the reality of communist nations(clean up the cold war propaganda)
Keep up the good work and I hope this channel finds success in the Pakistani people's consciousness.
The first reactionary talking point you mentioned can be debunked by pointing out the innovation is USSR and Cuba. And China too. Money often is not only not the motivation for innovation, it is often an excuse to keep the status quo. That is why US keeps sliding more and more into oil and gas consumption. They don't have the motivation to move to renewable energy like, for example, China.. Look at Cuban healthcare innovation. No profit motive involved and they have so much blockade from US but they developed vaccine for cancer, 5 different covid vaccines, etc etc
Socialism is excellent system on Paper but practically it leads to state's dominance in economy which leads to ineffective society, with slow to nil progress in innovation.
@@Suqrat400 I just want you to consider the fact that Russia went from being basically a rural feudal state pre-revolution to competing with the world's largest superpower and winning the space race in the span of a bit over half a century. If that isn't innovation and massive progress I cannot tell you what is. Most of your so called innovation comes from publicly funded technologies that companies then patent. As for being lazy you can see how in the modern era production has gone up but work hours and wages remain stagnant. The goal of innovation isn't to make people work forever but to make our lives easier through technology. You can find extensive discussions on the topics I mentioned above if you want.
@@moazhanif5221 you misunderstood my statement. I mean to say that all of those are knee jerk responses and are very easy to debunk. You'll find those points parroted by the majority of people opposed to criticisms of capitalism.
@@maddoscientist1905 oh my bad. Sorry it's late
Question: What do you do with the present landlords/capitalists, while bringing these reforms?
Thanks
Thank once again for your excellent talk and busting some of the myths that anti Marxism spread. Although I do not follow Urdu completely but I do get the main gist of your talk. When is your next talk? Best of luck. I see the machine workers for a foreign international company in Islamabad iar are being denied their promised bonuses. Could you cover workers exploitation and what can they do about it in the existing legal frame work in your next talk and make it available to the wider working classes.
Good to see, you uploading knowledge everyday ❤😊
Thanks for a great podcast. It has been very informative. I just wanted to ask a question. What would incentivise a person to work harder in a socialist system? Can they move up the ladder if they improve their skill set and
Sir, please upload it somewhere as a podcast please 🙏 your all lecture
I really appreciate your videos. Keep them coming. Very informative and educative.
From where I can get this Urdu translated book of Karl Marks in India. If it is on Amazon then plz sahre the link?
As a potential entrepreneur, what is incentive for me to upgrade from SME to a giant and group of companies if a/c to you at 10:34 such resources will get adapted by the society(govt). Just like Bhutto regime's Nationalization Drive in 70s?
Can a nation prosper finncially if its potential geniuses doesnt have the right to own the prospered version of their business??
Sir ek sawal hai competition between individuals or companies progress ki taraf society ko lekr chalti hain, jese ke investment in new startups or businesses jis ke natijai me hmari society as a whole taraqi krti hai, agr government ke under cheezain kia us surat me dunya me fortune 500 jesi companies exist krpai gi woh individuals jinhone technology or health ke sector ko agai barhaya, Jese abhi recently Elon Musk ne twitter buy krke uski inner working ko opensource krdia hai or google jesi company jisne recently ayse algorithms pr kaam kia jinse DNA ke structure ko predict krske taqai beemario se bacha ja ske phle hi. To socialism ki surat me kia ye sb progress mumkin.
Is pr ek agr ap detailed video krske to bht acha hoajega.
Thank you
I have a question, What does the Marx and Engel talk about the lands and assets which are not part of means of production?
Like, buying assets in the form of land and other commodities?
Thank you so much sir
I don't have words to appreciate you ❤️
Sir plz make a detail video on social democracy...
Sir yeh linea konsi book ki hain? Mjhy yahi book chahye jo english urdu translate ho
Sir, Islamic economic system pe bh ek video bnae or btaen wo kis system se zaida musbihat rkhta hy, capitalism or socialism
Very elaborate and effective communication. I think you should also explain the state of religious freedom or atheist approach in a communist society.
The Soviets propagated and even enforced atheism, they destroyed many eastern orthodox churches which they thought were backward.
If it helps in the soviet constitution, any anti-semite, anti-religious activity we’re considered grave crimes, specially in the former as any anti-semite activity were met with death penalty
Shah waliullah R.A ke nazrea ke mutabiq ek vedio bna do plz
Very powerful explanation bro! But unless all the people accept the socialist ideology as their ideal it is very difficult to implement it in society, as we know law can not be kept by force alone but people need to have a basic conscience about good and bad. Also I think it is sometimes hard to convince people to the socialist ideology. Shall we stick to the democratic way of bringing the change. What strategy do you prefer?
Dr Sahab, how do you determine the quantity of commodity required? Without prices giving the information on what to produce more and what to produce less how do you figure that out in a socialist society.
Janab Taimur Rehman, i like your videos and love you as well.
I have request:
Friedrich Nietzsche is one of the complex philosopher. It's hard to comprehend him reading his books. I request you to make some videos to present his complex ideas in a more comprehensive way. I believe that you can do it in best possible way.
Is anywhere this topic available in English?
Sir As i think progress will not happen through communism and also production process will be slow because of this system??
Sir what's your stake? Will it be possible to end this private property idea in future? Will there idea of public property in future ?
Can some one explain me the difference between Shah wali ullah's school of thought that is still be preaching in a part of society, and karl max school of thoughts?
Do they have any similarities? What points of Shah walli ullah's concept contradicts with Marxism concept? Please sir let us have a lecture on this. Thank you
Shah waliullah presented the concept of socialism that he mentioned as "Muaashi Adal" before anyother such concept being prevailed during the Mughal Era. Shah Waliullah's Teachings are according to asian conditions. It is based on Human Nature and Marx's philosphy is based on materialism. They don't condradict each other. They were presented for different conditions.
Sir please make a playlist of all socialism related videos.
Thanks Dr Sahib for these educational videos , I have a question, I like the idea of socialism, can we achieve the same with free market/capitalism by taxing and regulating the rich, and investing that money in social welfare programs, healthcare, education etc.
sir in school of thought ku pakistan ka koi religious sect accept krta hy..ya kisi bhi islamic country me koi sect accept krta ho k ye thoughts islami school of life sy agree krty hn.....
Doctor sb what does Karl Marx say about the private businesses in which there is element of Privatization to some extent...?
Thanks, like every other day, I learn today too from your lecture sir. I too think he's never read MARX :) :)
sir niji malokiat agar khatam hojai to Malik to goverment ban jai gi or bahat tax lagi... julm to phir bhi hoga
abhi bhi sale Tex 17person ha or people ko kia milta ha
garib martaa ha
According to socialism landlord and tenant business is also prohibited or it's not the part of "sarmedaari" and "jagerrdaari"
In such system the sarmayadar and jagirdar won't be completely abolished. They'll be replaced by the almighty government. For common people, dealing with petty samayadar and jagirdar is difficult as it is but they have a choice. Imagine dealing with the government, it's dictators, their standing army and will to do whatever they want and people with no choice to escape. No thanks!
Very laudable leading question!👍
@Waqas Gulzar who'll guarantee that the govt will treat people with equality? If a leader elected in one party dictatorial socialist system discriminates against one minority group or another what will you do? Another revolution?
@Waqas Gulzar In capitalist democracy everyone is equal in the eyes of law. There are laws for anti discrimination and govt cannot treat people differently. Most people who benefit from social welfare programs don't contribute anything towards those programs in terms of taxes, hence your assumption that govt treats people depending upon their financial background is mere nonsense. Have you ever lived in a successful western democracy? I guess, not. You should visit and live in a western democracy for some time and experience first-hand instead of talking from your backside, sitting in a failed corrupt state of Pakistan.
Please do a vlog explaining the difference between Communism and Anarchism.
Communism is the power of the people, whereas anarchism fights against power be it top-down (state to people) and otherwise.
Sir you may clear it that
If we discuss capatalism and Communism in first and second world countries both are developed
like in Europe and America there is capatalism but developed
and in Russia and China there is almost communism they are also developed.
But this issue rise only in Third world countries?
Sir what do you say about jamshed Dasti's press conference?
Want to know your take on this. Is he a pro socialist? Kindly make a video on current issue.
Sorry Dr. Sb, totally and strongly disagree with what you said in this video.
1. Why is it assumed by Communists that all Capitalists are greedy? Many of the Capitalist Billionaires donate Billions of Dollars to different charities. Warren Buffet (Greedy, Selfish Capitalist and one of the greatest investors worth $100 Billion) has donated more than 99% of his wealth to several charities after his death. Recently Word Food Org asked Elon Musk (Wealthiest Greedy and Selfish man in the world) that if he give only 2% of his wealth ($6 Billion) they can end world hunger. Within weeks Elon donated $6 Billion to World Food Org. I can list many more examples.
2. No Capitalist says that in a Communist regime, every one will have the same salary, it's just simply goes against "Common sense" - how can a doctor and janitor salary be the same?
3. Capitalists argue that Communism kills incentive to work. In other words it "disincentivizes" work. You can see this in the large public sector entitles (PIA, Railways, Pak Steel etc) run by govt and incurring billions of losses every year, where workers say "Sanoo ki, sadi nokri tay paki hay". They have the incentive Not to work.
4. I was shocked that you mentioned Na-Pak Army (Most Corrupt Army in the world) run entities. These entities are rife with corruption and a parasite sucking the hard earned tax money of people. have you ever seen any audit reports of these entities? Their losses are simply covered by our tax money. By the way they also run DHA and Bharia. town A by product of these corrupt Na=Pak Army run entities are Papa John pizzas (just a tip of the ice berg) and many more to be revealed
You are just another victim of capitalist propaganda.
Communist don't use the word "greedy" To define capitalist.
You exposed yourself then and there.
And as for the donation, I am 100% sure you don't know that it is just a method to avoid taxation.
By creating a subsidiary of their own company and donating to it, their net taxable income is reduced and the money they donated is never used.
In 2018 or 2019,it was estimated that bill and melinda Gates Foundation just used 5% of the amount for charity work since 2010,even though the amount allocated was in millions.
I can explain dozens of other economic methods and practices, these capitalist pigs 🐷 use to loot the working class and avoid taxation.
The net taxation rate for Jeff Bezos in 2018 was 0.2% .
And Elon musk didn't pay any taxes for 2 years straight.
Both got huge government contracts, subsidies and bailout.
Amazon space program went into a loss and congress brought up 10 billion dollars bailout package for it.
You can look that up if you like.
Sadly, I don't understand Urdu. Do you produce anything in English or with English subtitles?
ua-cam.com/channels/-uZ14hl2nfZDA75EO_qs4Q.html
This one is his English channel
Great lecture. Waiting for next
Government owned industries and other organizations like PIA( its now private) steel mill etc are operating under deficit
Meri jeet teri jeet.
Meri haar teri haar.
Sun e mere yaar.
Yeh dosti hum nahi chodenge.
Sholay!
Means of production requires motivation and when you start equally distributing the means of production, people who work hard loses that motivation which then kills competition and killing competition creates monopoly. And the worst the govt has monopoly over the means of production and too much govt kills the productivity.
Can u explain the concept of Proletariatist Dictatorship in Maxism?
Thanks for background information 🌟
Definitely another world 🌎 is possible...
लाल सलाम..!
Mr taimoor as you have mentioned the precolonial agricultural policy in subcontinent which i have read about. But you didnt mention that it was not any kind a socialist policy in nature and origin so let me mention here that it was a sharia (islamic) prescribed policy implemented by the muslim rulers.
What about educational institutes ownership in socialism?
There's difference between personal and private.
Sir I have 2 questions,
Why most of communist countries convert to capitalism like China ,they just have name communism although it's economic system is pure capitalistic.
And how we bring competition if means of production become public because most govt are mire on try to provide instead of bringing new products for example we don't have that much of products if capitalism doesn't exist
How do we have internet and companies like Starlink who aims to provide internet through satellite all over the world, most govt can't afford this high investment and rich countries invest in it they impose condition on countries who receives service and have more power over that country, but the capitalists just aims for profit no other conditions as a comparison.
Aren't the Mixed Economy reduce the class difference and are more effective than both capitalism and socialism?
Please sir, islamic economic system pe nzr dalen
Mix economy per b vlog karien
thank you sir for this informative struggle
Your lecture is excellent but status co is so strong because of its persistence since its inception, I feel pain how we could get rid of this rotten system.
Sir Mera aik sawal hai ke aaj Kal yeh bhi bat horahi hai k duniya may communism lagne jaraha hai aur hum sab ko slavery may Jana Hoga aur humare basic rights khatum hojaye ge ...Kya yeh sab Sahi hai???
Lol. Who is saying this? Communism is a system where everyone works together and shares in the fruits of their labour. There is no exploitation.
@@Taimur_Laal ok Sir main social media may different channels par yeh batein Suni Hain tou Socha AP se share kardo 😊
@@AdnanDurez highly exaggerated. I'd say it is a bit absurd. There is no strong communist movement in Pakistan.
@@Taimur_Laal Ok Sir yes you are right 😊👍
Thanks Sir
सर मार्क्सवाद में पुंजीवाद की तरह समय के साथ परिवर्तन नहीं आया है। और आया तो मार्क्सवादी इसे सामने नहीं ला पाए हैं। मार्क्सवाद को भी एक John Menard Keynes की जरूरत है
Absolutely correct sir
Can u kindly mention the book name?
Das capital.
Revolution and dictatorship of proletariat is the unpractical part.... Who will watch the watch man?? Professor T
But how is it going to uplift our economic condition, that’s really required. Please elaborate on how the economic system will work?
I understand that if class system is abolished, the element of exploitation will be eliminated but then again, how will it elevate the living conditions of the family who is living below the poverty line?
Excellent sir
I have learnt that communism says that
work according to you ability and payed according to your need
is it right or wrong ?
Capitalism is leagues more destructive and exploitative but authoritarian socialism is different than a egalitarian direct democracy socialism
Do you intend to create a "Taimur Rahman - English" channel?
Yes. Already created it.
Phir tax collection kis tarah huge sir ?? Aghar malkiyat industry society ke malkeyat hu jaye ??
Or aghar aghar ikhteyarat society ke pass hu tu phir ye tu dictatorship ko farogh dete he ??
Ap keya kehte he ??
Sir muje nahi lagtaa ke is duur me ye mumkin be haa ?
@@abbaskhan7342 yes pakistan me mushkil he.😅
Sir ek video historiography pe bhi bna dijiye
Sir kia socialist country me bank khatam hojae ga ...kyun k bank me pese rkhne se muraad ap sarmaye se kamai krrhe hen...
China bhi ek socialist country he waha kia bank band ho geya he . govt bank ki jayda power hota he.
Aor wo sarmaya pehle bar Un ka pas kaha sa ata Hain....
Great job Sir
It’s not simple as you explained there are big contradictory details. As devil lies in details. Thanks
Thank You sir 💜
Communists say "Democracy is a tool of capitalists used to preserve the capitalist system", how much do you agree with this statement?
Do they take advantage of democracy or they just prefer democracy over autocracy (as a general rule) in modern age?
Do you see any possibility communism can win, grow and function well in a democracy?
Thanks in advance.
Sir some people try to distinguish Socialism, Capitalism and Communism. For example, they say that socialism is a soft version of communism (Dr. Munawar Sabir).
Another example is that communism favours dictatorship while socialism favours democracy (social democracy)...
Some people use these three words (Socialism, Capitalism and Marxism) interchangeably.
Sir please tell us whether there is any difference among them or not.
Thank you.
don't ask him
for marx socialism and Communism are the same think if you read him you will notice that marx uses both words interchangeably
Also Marx, never said communism to be an alternative system to Capitalism he saw it as a movement which is beyond Capitalism, like how Capitalism (and the many struggle against monarchism caused it) was beyond Feudalism. For marx Communism would be a fundamentally different by core, it won't even have commodity production or money. Marx never made a blue print on how so called communist society would look like (hence the confusion) he was more interested in the functions of Capitalism (hence his main book is called CAPITAL: critique of the political economy, and was not called COMMUNISM: How to make it) and society in general. while thinking that the fall of Capitalism (mode of production, in which commodities, Free market and private property for expanding capital is the norm) would be caused by the working class movements (note by working class, Marx meant anyone who earns a wage meaning both so called blue and white collar workers). Marx also saw Capitalism to be an important step before communism, as it helps in industrialisation.
For Marx communism/socialism (he used them interchangeably) isn't when government does stuff, it isn't even government controls properly and it isn't even government controls commodity import, export and production ie it isn't when government does capitalism. Marx views state property just to be private property of the state. He views that, if the state is the one controlling commodity production then it is state-capitalism not socialism/communism. Marx and his friend Engels, made fun of social democrats who only saw socialism just when government controls stuff.
"Marxists" are the people believe in "Marxism" ( Marx theories ), however marx himself was against the word as it glorifies him. Engles his best friend said "Marxism" is the worst thing ever happened to Marx's work. Marx wanted his work to be the the steeping one for a new form of science. A science doesn't the anaylsis the natural but rather the social world basically what we now call social sciences/sociology. Marx's science is different than others as he believes the world and only be seen in connection in one another.
Sir ek video types of Socialism py bhi bnayen
Thank u Sir
Great explanation sir
Thank u
Crystal clear concepts
So, in socialism, if the means of production aren't owned by capitalists, who owns it then? Is it owned by the state? or by workers? or by the community? Which community? Or by the entire population of a country? I mean, in Pakistan, if there are 24 crore people and only 3 crore acres of arable land, so these 24 crore people will own collectively 3 crore pieces of land?
What happens with the profit of the means of production? Does the state take it? Or is it divided equally among workers? Or the profit is again invested in making the means of production better?
If the means of production are owned by the state, isn't it risky if some kind of crazy person sits on the throne and tries to use it for his personal benefit?
A beautiful explanation.
@TairmoorRahaman
سر تو پھر ریاست کو فوج کے ہی حوالے کر دیا جائے نہ اگر فوجی ادارے نان پروفٹ ہیں ؟
دوسرا اگر کوئی جاگیردار نہیں ہوگا تو ذرائع پیداوار تو یقیناً حکومتِ وقت کے پاس ہوگی، سر کیا اسلامی نظام اسی نظام کی عکاسی نہیں کر رہا اگر اسے حقیقی طریقہ سے چلایا جائے ؟
Great
Also sir, it is strongly believed that capitalism promotes innovation and eliminating free market will destroy the potential that arises from that healthy competition and ownership of capital by individuals.
Good point bro! This is a major plus for capitalist society. I think a communist state will always lag behind a capitalist state in terms of science, technology, innovation and market because capitalist system's greedy nature of leadership is very powerful than the responsibility oriented work force in communism. A communist state will need to isolate it's population from capitalist state in order to keep them loyal to socialism with the outdated state of science and technology as compared to the capitalist state's.
Would they be entitled to have share in the profits of a company.
People will not care about their work if they don't have sense of belongingness. 🤔
सर, हम भारत से आपको सुनते हैं, इसलिए हमारी उर्दू काफ़ी कमजोर हैं। आपसे एक विनम्र निवेदन हैं कि उर्दू के शब्द थोड़े कम इस्तेमाल कीजिए। 🇮🇳🇵🇰
I wish this was in English sir
Well explained sir
Yesterday I was talking with my dad . He spent sometime in Russia so we were discussing Russian life . It was shocking to me because everything was in the hands of government . There was no private business even though the restaurants and barbershop was running by government .
Imagine the scale of corruption when Govt owns every bit of your life. They interfere and tell you what to do and what not to do. Imagine you living with a conscious but not unable to use it to exercise your freedom.
No wonder Soviets collapsed. It cannot exist in this day and age. Sure there should be social equality but you can't stop one working hard and making more compare to someone who is lazy or out of ideas.
@@aftabnaveed yes , people are objecting on these things.
@@nrnewss3723 exactly you are right . Man made system cannot do justice .
⚘
اس پر یہ سوال ہے کہ کیا اس کا نتیجہ یہن نہیں نکلے گا کہ ذرائع پیداوار کا مالک فرد کی بجائے حکومت ہو جائے گی، فرد کی بجائے افراد کا ایک گروہ ہو جائے گا۔ آجر اور مزدور کا طبقہ پھر بھی ختم نہ ہوگا۔ استحصال پھر بھی ختم نہ ہوگا۔ حکومت مزوروں کی بھی آ جائے گی تو اس کی کیا ضمانت ہے کہ وہ گروہی مفادات قربان کریں گے؟
Hm, interesting concept but the practical implication is vague. I mean the most important element to consider here is the drive... I think the drive to advance in the modern world is directly linked to the reward which in almost all cases is more profits. With Socialism in place, how would you incentivize the people to put in 16-20 hours a day if they are expected to work 9-5 only. And all technological advancements have been made by people going above and beyond their 9-5. Also, if you have worked in a large company, you might know how bureaucratic the environment is and the last thing you want to do is to give its ownership to the entity that's known for its bureaucratic flaws (Govt).
Honestly speaking, I think humanity never demand for progress (health care excluded), everyone is happy today unless something new arrives tomorrow today's world will not lose it's charm. World seemed much peaceful place 20 years ago too. But yes, the progress gap between capitalist and communist states will result in people losing interest in communism, because as human we value hustle bustle of technology more than peace of mind. 🙂
The lecture is very good but the title is very bad. Please change title of the video.
sir, please explain if china is communist or not?
not only china, vietnam,laos.cuba ,present communist countries.😊
🌸💜