And it costs between £250 for a well used one and £400 for a pristine one second hand. Absolute belter of a lens for the price point still producing amazing images.
I hope this means we can expect a Sony GM 85mm F1.2, before too long. The F1.4 is great, but it was released five years go - and Sony's lens tech is improving all the time, as we saw with the new 35mm F1.4.
A very desirable lens for portraitists, street and travel photographers. I wonder if it would look huge on a a7C and if the images on this smaller body with lower resolution would benefit from such a good lens (that’s the combo I am considering)
I would like to see the comparison between Nikon, Canon and Sony 50 1.2 things like sharpness, Light Transmission (Approx T stop..kind of which is brighter at same settings at 1.2), bokeh, flare and aberrations
Can you compare the light transmission between these two lenses? In other words how much lighter is the 1.2? Not all lenses have the same T-Stop as the F-Stop. I'm asking for low light. The 50mm 1.4 has a t-Stop of t-1.6. I am hoping the 50mm 1.2 is closer to t-1.2
I believe that I learned on super-exciting new "coated" lenses. Linear versus rotational focus motors -- huh? What do you mean, motors? Lots of blur and chromatic aberration in the corners, of course. And, of course, flare! Lots and lots of flare. Today's lenses are miracles, at least for someone like me.
Oh wow, love the photos you took with this lens Ted Forbes! I also like how you zoomed in to show the detail even if shot at 1.2. Thanks for loving Photography and for creating great content for the world on your wonderful channel!
Nikon never said the Sony mount was too small. it was the F Mount they were referring to and it was too small for mirror reflex registration distancing. hence why they came up with the z mount, which also allows them to push towards medium format, or close anyway, without a new mount 😉
Back in the analog days from the 1970´s to the 1990/2000´s a 50mm was just a "cheap" kit lens that almost everyone got together with the camera, but only a very few ever used a 50mm, I think (and many others) that lenses from 45mm and every lens shorter plus every lenses from 55mm and longer are the best choice ! I like the Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8 because it is so light and compact, I want it in a new and better optical version (an aperture ring will be very nice). Even better will a 60mm 2.0 be !
After your last few videos and seeing you pop up in this comment section, I'm starting to wonder when you're gonna make the switch to becoming a full time photography/videography channel :p Cool seeing you on this side of UA-cam!
@@arunashamal Hi Aruna. Now this is no reason to get unfriendly, is it? I very much appreciate Teds videos and just wanted to point it out so he could correct or otherwise react to it, since I seemed to be one of the first viewers.
Same!! I’ve used 50mm (35 on apsc sensor) for years and it’s a bit limiting . Since moving to full frame I chose the 35 1.4gm and just purchased the 70-200gm oss ii for more range
I don't mean to rain on the Sony Bandwagon, But remember Nikon and Canon have been making lenses for far longer. They make more cameras and lenses and have a longer track record and a greater selection of equipment. Something to consider...
Thanks for the review, Ted. For me, the 50 is it. I may have erred on the side of “too few” but I sold every other lens I had and now have only 50s. And brother, I keep going back to look at that gas meter. Excellent!
I own a Sony system right now (with some gm lenses, they get better and better). But would you mind giving your thoughts on long-term reliability and build quality of the modern gm lenses (they did some small build quality improvements like better declickable aperture etc) vs the canon rf lenses? It seems to me that the difference might not be ground breaking but canon still has the better build quality. Some remarks regarding what you said in the video: -> The lense features 4 linear focus motors (each one separate sensor which work electronically together) in 2 separate groups using a floating lense design (not 2 motors like you said) -> only one 55mm sony was released, not several ones -> F1.2 is half a stop faster, not 1/3, in the specific case of this lense the entrance pupil is 17% bigger and the front glass area is 40% bigger than a 1.4 version would be
Thank you for the nice intro. TBH I’m not much interested in how much better this glass is than Nikon, or Canon 50’s, as I am a Sony shooter anyways, however understanding the technical and practical differences compared to other Sony 50-55mm glass would be a great help maintaining or chilling my desire for spending way too much on a used to be kit type of lens.
Ted I'm interested in the Aperture ring precision among these three. When they are configured to clickless, how precise do they become? Are they limited to 1/3 stop? Are they limited to 1/4 stop? 1/6 stop? 1/8 stop? etc. This might be valuable to know when you adjust aperture during a video.
So care to set an expectation on when the 50/1.2 lens comparison video will be available for our viewing. Got the 35/1.4 GM this pas week and really happy with it. Delivery of the 50/1.2 GM is now a month away for us normal people so I am trying to determine if I want to keep my pre-order in and sell my 50/1.4 ZA. Thank you and take care.
Love the 55 f/1.8 Zeiss lens but it has some Longitudinal chromatic abberation I don't like. Although this new GM seems to have none of that or very little it's much bigger and heavier than the sel55f18. So it would be a difficult choice if I had the money.
This is actually a 50mm I will purchase! However, if the Mark II version of the 85mm f1.4 comes out soon with the same focusing motors and the nano-coating, I might wait. Sony’s GM lenses are definitely a step up from both Nikon’s and Canon’s pro lines. If I could afford them I would have a copy of each.
Looks to be a well good 50mm - I however still don't consider the bokeh to be a patch on another little known Sony; the 135mm f/2.8 STF - formerly made by Minolta and re-badged by Sony when they bought out Minolta. Its a manual focus lens, and requires either an A-mount Sony or E-mount with adaptor, and its coatings are not as good as modern GM lenses, but it can produce lovely shots with the smoothest creamiest bokeh.
I don't really get why it is not possible to make faster apertures on smaller mounts. Can some one explain or give a link to some article? I want to explain it to myself without any marketing bs, physics is unbiased, right?
Impressive lens. I just ordered this lens yesterday. And your review tells really detailed information I wanted to know. (Also the reviewer is really cute)
My all time favorite lens is the Canon 40mm 2.8 pancake. To me, 50 is too narrow, and 35 feels too wide. There's something about that shorty 40 that Canon makes. Too bad they discontinued it. I hope they make an RF version of it. That would be awesome.
Thanks for the review you asked about questions. I was wondering about the "Zeiss 3D POP" micro contrast etc. one of the reasons I bought the Zony was it has some of that heritage. Putting down that amount of money did not sting as much as it did have a Planar look. I was hoping in your full review you could go into that a little bit. Thanks
I went through a Zeiss phase. What wonderful lenses they were, compared to what had been the norm before! Micro contrast is the simultaneous presence of sharpness, low chromatic aberration, and low flare. Wonderful, wonderful stuff compared to what had come before. Still, this new Sony glass (and perhaps Canon) is something well beyond that. It's an amazing world we live in right now!
@@stuartschaffner9744 Thanks for the reply well I think like a lot of photographers who own the Sony 50 1.4 its going to be hard to justify the upgrade. I also own the Voigtlander 65mm f2 apo if I want the ultimate in image quality. Looks like the 50 1.2 would be a way to get it all in one package. It is a great time to get into emount that is for sure.
Great video! Thank you for the test shots. I just recently switched to Sony and have been wondering when they’ll put out an updated 50mm lens, ideally a GM version... and here it is! Looks like a great lens, one that I now plan on buying.
This is great, Sony is getting back to lenses like in the film days. Canon FD 50mm f/1.2 and 50mm f/1.2L but also the many f/1.4, f/1.8 and f/2. When I bought my A7S ('14) I used with an adapter all my Canon FD lenses for about two years, I was saving for future Sony lenses. Yes manual everything but also sharp. Have you ever thought of doing a compare of the FD to the FE lenses, just for grins? Good at night Yes, did my first lunar eclipse (blue hour) in 2014 with a Canon telephoto FD 80-200mm f/4 at 100mm with adapter 10-08-2014 Jekyll Island Ga. to the west.
I'm a Nikon shooter and probably will never own the 50 1.2. Having said that the Nikon 50 1.2 is HUGE and this is super small, in comparison. Just saw Manny Ortiz's video on this and it appears the quality of the image/video is on par with the Nikon. I'd really like to see someone do a in-depth side by side review of both.
For me f/3.5 is wide open, mostly I shoot at f/8 or f/11. Paper-thin DOF is a detriment for my advertising and editorial work. A good test, of a lens I'll never need. Will Sony ever make a Tilt & Shift lens, something that I often use?
This kind of lens already exists especially from third parties, in fact sony already made one. G master is for professionals, they dont really care about the price of lenses
Hey Ted, have you noticed the electronic first curtain shutter eats the bottom half of the bokeh "circle" from around 1/1000 sec and faster? For those images I always switch back to full mechanical shutter. See 3:16 for reference. Manny Ortiz has a video on the topic. Really weird issue.
Great channel. I am so hard decision which one should i buy between New Sony fe 2424-70mm f2.8 Vs Sony fe 50mm f1.2 GM? Prime is great aperture and image quality and 24-70mm is versatile?
Looking forward to the comparison! Not only the photo side but how does the three lenses handle video autofocus. Is the focusing smooth? Quiet? “Behaving” well for video, is there any focus breathing? Flare handling? Thanks
This lens is the reason why I didn’t buy the Nikon Z50mm f1.2 for my Nikon Z9. The Nikon version is waaaay too big to take out the house or keep mounted on your camera at all times. It also has this display window on the lens which I think is aesthetically not pleasing, at least not to me. I love the other Nikon Z prime lenses except the Nikon Z50mm f1.2. THIS Sony 50mm f1.2 looks amazing on the Nikon Z9 with the Megadapt ETZ21 that is practically invisible and from what I hear all the functions are flawless
Nikon engineers know very well that a system's maximum f/-stop is determined by FFD as well as by mount diameter. Sly devils! To Nikon's credit, they probably designed the Z mount to be able to house a medium format sensor. If that's true, I'm impressed that they are thinking ahead.
Nikon shooter here. Not that I can afford any of the 1.2 primes by Sony, Canon and Nikon, kudos to Sony for pulling off quite a feat by making the lens noticeably smaller and lighter than the other two.
I always find your videos impressive and rich in information... ! I have a Sonya7III and mostly use it for portraits and I am looking for an upgrade. Having said that, Ted would you recommend I upgrade to the SONY a7RIV?
Admit not interested in Nikon because I don't own one of their bodies now. Really like to understand the strengths and weakness of the 50/1.2 GM vs the RF 50/1.2 since I own a body from each. Was about to go out and buy the Canon until about a week ago until I heard about the Sony. So now I need to choose. IMHO Canon's RF f/2.8 zooms from 15-200 appear better than Sony's GM (which I own). Sony's primes now from 20-135 G/GM appear better than Canon's now that the 50/1.2GM has joined the family. Not that Canon's are not great at f/1.2 but they really only cover those two focal lengths with L series lenses. Thanks for your video. Always enjoy.
So much would depend on how big your tattoos were and a number of other individual issues. Could you rent or borrow some lenses and check all this out?
As usual super good video ! Putting autofocus and price on the side, the real match or comparison test is with a Summilux 50 or even with Noctilux 50, isn’t it ?
Stupid question, but is this lens worth the money? I'm just getting started but I know exactly what I want to shoot and I can't get it using the kit lens with the A7C. Any feedback is much appreciated. Thx.
Sample photos were great. As you do your tests, could you please include a reason(s) an enthusiast should buy it to replace his Rokkor 1.2 & 1.4 lenses on K&F Concept adapter? Reason(s) suitable for presentation to said enthusiast's wife preferred. Much thanks for informative videos...
Some of my best street shots were on 50mm, I later moved to 35mm so I could get a little more air around my street subjects, and I find it matches my naked eye perception better, the camera becomes a better extension of my eye... That being said, the 50mm is my second best length. PS: I now shoot with the equivalent of a 40mm on my GFX system.
Agree! your self portraits look much better @4. I own the sexy Zeiss Batis 85mm 1.8 fave for portraits and 50mm 1.4 zeiss sony mount is my go to lens for whatever.
Could you please make a video exclusively about this lens for video (and/or cinema) work? How good is it for talking head UA-cam videos? Thanks so much matey! 🏆
the Sony Zeiss 55mm 1.8 also has a concave front element.
As well as the APS-C 35mm F1.8 OSS from Sony.
That was my first Sony lens. An absolute beaut!
Loved that lens! Sold it for this one
And it costs between £250 for a well used one and £400 for a pristine one second hand. Absolute belter of a lens for the price point still producing amazing images.
I hope this means we can expect a Sony GM 85mm F1.2, before too long. The F1.4 is great, but it was released five years go - and Sony's lens tech is improving all the time, as we saw with the new 35mm F1.4.
You're gonna get us all broke! 😂
@@bahaatamer1245 I'm flattered you think my post has influenced Sony's plans!
We just got screwed with the new 85 1.4 again. Shoulda been 1.2
Love how you slip and say you wished for a « Nikon » 50mm 1.2 around 1:45 ;)
😂
lol thats true, nikon "wishes" to make a 50 f1.2 fe
@@BlackwaterAquatics Nikon has a 50 1.2 released a year ago .
Woosh...
@@BlackwaterAquatics the nikon is the best 1.2 50mm I think personally.
A very desirable lens for portraitists, street and travel photographers. I wonder if it would look huge on a a7C and if the images on this smaller body with lower resolution would benefit from such a good lens (that’s the combo I am considering)
I would like to see the comparison between Nikon, Canon and Sony 50 1.2 things like sharpness, Light Transmission (Approx T stop..kind of which is brighter at same settings at 1.2), bokeh, flare and aberrations
the quiet and way faster focus motor in this makes it better by default, as focusing at f1.2 is challenging
I think I am going to stick with the Sony 55mm F1.8. It also has a concave front element btw. Just prefer the size and weight.
50mm is a wonderful focal lenght, I agree. The question is: do you really need the f/1.2 aperture?
50mm @1.2 is so dope though man 👍🏻 Not everyone needs or wants it, especially with the price tags.
I mean the lens is higher quality outside of the aperture lol
@@kefkapalazzo1 No one would notice
Can you compare the light transmission between these two lenses? In other words how much lighter is the 1.2? Not all lenses have the same T-Stop as the F-Stop. I'm asking for low light. The 50mm 1.4 has a t-Stop of t-1.6. I am hoping the 50mm 1.2 is closer to t-1.2
Would love to see how it compares with 55mm 1.8!
Me too. I just love my 55. It have just 2 issues. Onion ring rings and LoCa. But stopped down for landscaping, og for portraits it's a perfect lens.
Me too
Funny how Sony carried on Minolta’s nomenclature of the G series. Minoltas best lenses were called G lenses.
Gold!
Same with the Alpha designation apparently
The G moniker carried over when Sony took over the A-mount from Minolta and rebranded a lot of their lenses.
@@Elgsdyr wonder if these lenses are still made in Minoltas old factories?
@@DandGBears most likely, why would they buy Minolta if it wasn’t for that
Those of a certain age learned the hobby/trade using 50MM lenses but the lenses then didn't compare to this latest crop which are truly excellent.
I believe that I learned on super-exciting new "coated" lenses. Linear versus rotational focus motors -- huh? What do you mean, motors? Lots of blur and chromatic aberration in the corners, of course. And, of course, flare! Lots and lots of flare. Today's lenses are miracles, at least for someone like me.
small sidenote: sony's own 55/1.8 lens also has a concave front element. minor point, but simply too close to not be mentioned ;)
I was very surprised that he didn't mention that one, too! I remember people mentioning how unusual it was back then.
It’s not 50. But 55. Zeiss Sony the best. Batis too. Not a big Sony fan for lenses. I’d rather guy off brand. Or Zeiss Sony combo
Oh wow, love the photos you took with this lens Ted Forbes! I also like how you zoomed in to show the detail even if shot at 1.2. Thanks for loving Photography and for creating great content for the world on your wonderful channel!
I'd be very curious about how it compares to the Canon 50mm f1.2 L lens!
I own rf 50mm f1.2 and it is absolutely amazing
Nikon never said the Sony mount was too small. it was the F Mount they were referring to and it was too small for mirror reflex registration distancing. hence why they came up with the z mount, which also allows them to push towards medium format, or close anyway, without a new mount 😉
Back in the analog days from the 1970´s to the 1990/2000´s a 50mm was just a "cheap" kit lens that almost everyone got together with the camera, but only a very few ever used a 50mm, I think (and many others) that lenses from 45mm and every lens shorter plus every lenses from 55mm and longer are the best choice ! I like the Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8 because it is so light and compact, I want it in a new and better optical version (an aperture ring will be very nice). Even better will a 60mm 2.0 be !
Great review! Such nice high dynamic range shots at sunset too 😍
After your last few videos and seeing you pop up in this comment section, I'm starting to wonder when you're gonna make the switch to becoming a full time photography/videography channel :p Cool seeing you on this side of UA-cam!
At 1:42: "My wish was, that Nikon would do a 50 mm as a G-Master" ... Nikon??
oh you bottomfeeders! he just made a mistake... now does all the comments have to be about that??
@@arunashamal Hi Aruna. Now this is no reason to get unfriendly, is it? I very much appreciate Teds videos and just wanted to point it out so he could correct or otherwise react to it, since I seemed to be one of the first viewers.
Have you got that Sony/Canon/Nikon 50mm comparison video yet? Can't wait!
having used the 35 and 50 before... I know I am a 35 more than a 50.. so.. skipping this.. sticking to my 35GM.. That said. this 1.2 GM is a beast.
Same!! I’ve used 50mm (35 on apsc sensor) for years and it’s a bit limiting . Since moving to full frame I chose the 35 1.4gm and just purchased the 70-200gm oss ii for more range
One of my favorite focal lengths 😍 2021 is the year Sony leads all its users into debt 😂😅
Wordddd
Yes !! Haha!! back on the hamster wheel of debt , damnit! ... just sold my canon 50mm 1.2 , And now this announcement 🤑🤑🤑
Yep, probably going to sell the house for the a7 IV and 50mm f1.2 😅
@@Cony989 probably be worth it lol
@@Karan-qm2ej could be a killa setup
Love this thumbnail. And video!! I want this lens SO BAD!!
I don't mean to rain on the Sony Bandwagon, But remember Nikon and Canon have been making lenses for far longer. They make more cameras and lenses and have a longer track record and a greater selection of equipment. Something to consider...
Thanks for the review, Ted. For me, the 50 is it. I may have erred on the side of “too few” but I sold every other lens I had and now have only 50s. And brother, I keep going back to look at that gas meter. Excellent!
I own a Sony system right now (with some gm lenses, they get better and better). But would you mind giving your thoughts on long-term reliability and build quality of the modern gm lenses (they did some small build quality improvements like better declickable aperture etc) vs the canon rf lenses? It seems to me that the difference might not be ground breaking but canon still has the better build quality.
Some remarks regarding what you said in the video:
-> The lense features 4 linear focus motors (each one separate sensor which work electronically together) in 2 separate groups using a floating lense design (not 2 motors like you said)
-> only one 55mm sony was released, not several ones
-> F1.2 is half a stop faster, not 1/3, in the specific case of this lense the entrance pupil is 17% bigger and the front glass area is 40% bigger than a 1.4 version would be
Thank you for the nice intro. TBH I’m not much interested in how much better this glass is than Nikon, or Canon 50’s, as I am a Sony shooter anyways, however understanding the technical and practical differences compared to other Sony 50-55mm glass would be a great help maintaining or chilling my desire for spending way too much on a used to be kit type of lens.
Ted I'm interested in the Aperture ring precision among these three. When they are configured to clickless, how precise do they become?
Are they limited to 1/3 stop? Are they limited to 1/4 stop? 1/6 stop? 1/8 stop? etc.
This might be valuable to know when you adjust aperture during a video.
As always, great and thorough review. Can’t wait to see the comparison video.
Was really hoping to see the field curvature test!
Hope he will have it out in a more detailed review....so far this lens is not looking too good to me....staying with what i have.
So care to set an expectation on when the 50/1.2 lens comparison video will be available for our viewing. Got the 35/1.4 GM this pas week and really happy with it. Delivery of the 50/1.2 GM is now a month away for us normal people so I am trying to determine if I want to keep my pre-order in and sell my 50/1.4 ZA. Thank you and take care.
just a little FYI, professional magazine portraits are shot at f8-f11
Love the 55 f/1.8 Zeiss lens but it has some Longitudinal chromatic abberation I don't like. Although this new GM seems to have none of that or very little it's much bigger and heavier than the sel55f18. So it would be a difficult choice if I had the money.
This is actually a 50mm I will purchase! However, if the Mark II version of the 85mm f1.4 comes out soon with the same focusing motors and the nano-coating, I might wait. Sony’s GM lenses are definitely a step up from both Nikon’s and Canon’s pro lines. If I could afford them I would have a copy of each.
700g, great rendering, low cromatic aberrations, and even fast AF!! bloody hell!! :D
Looks to be a well good 50mm - I however still don't consider the bokeh to be a patch on another little known Sony; the 135mm f/2.8 STF - formerly made by Minolta and re-badged by Sony when they bought out Minolta. Its a manual focus lens, and requires either an A-mount Sony or E-mount with adaptor, and its coatings are not as good as modern GM lenses, but it can produce lovely shots with the smoothest creamiest bokeh.
I don't really get why it is not possible to make faster apertures on smaller mounts. Can some one explain or give a link to some article? I want to explain it to myself without any marketing bs, physics is unbiased, right?
Impressive lens. I just ordered this lens yesterday. And your review tells really detailed information I wanted to know. (Also the reviewer is really cute)
My all time favorite lens is the Canon 40mm 2.8 pancake. To me, 50 is too narrow, and 35 feels too wide. There's something about that shorty 40 that Canon makes. Too bad they discontinued it. I hope they make an RF version of it. That would be awesome.
40mm is my favourite too, has a unique look too! I have the 40mm G 2.5, it's great!
At 1:40 you say that “you wish Nikon would do a 50mm as a gmaster...” uh what? Lol I mean yes we all wish Nikon was like Sony.
You can still adapt Sony glass on Z bodies, with some performance loss.
@@frankfeng2701 why?
Thanks for the review you asked about questions. I was wondering about the "Zeiss 3D POP" micro contrast etc. one of the reasons I bought the Zony was it has some of that heritage. Putting down that amount of money did not sting as much as it did have a Planar look. I was hoping in your full review you could go into that a little bit. Thanks
I went through a Zeiss phase. What wonderful lenses they were, compared to what had been the norm before! Micro contrast is the simultaneous presence of sharpness, low chromatic aberration, and low flare. Wonderful, wonderful stuff compared to what had come before. Still, this new Sony glass (and perhaps Canon) is something well beyond that. It's an amazing world we live in right now!
@@stuartschaffner9744 Thanks for the reply well I think like a lot of photographers who own the Sony 50 1.4 its going to be hard to justify the upgrade. I also own the Voigtlander 65mm f2 apo if I want the ultimate in image quality. Looks like the 50 1.2 would be a way to get it all in one package. It is a great time to get into emount that is for sure.
I can't seem to find the video comparing the 3 different 50mm f/1.2s. Would you be so kind as to share the link if you have indeed posted it?
The 55 sonnar e mount has a concave front element.
Excellent video. Just subscribed!
Could you please tell what lens is used in the video? It is very sharp
Great video! Thank you for the test shots. I just recently switched to Sony and have been wondering when they’ll put out an updated 50mm lens, ideally a GM version... and here it is! Looks like a great lens, one that I now plan on buying.
This is great, Sony is getting back to lenses like in the film days. Canon FD 50mm f/1.2 and 50mm f/1.2L but also the many f/1.4, f/1.8 and f/2. When I bought my A7S ('14) I used with an adapter all my Canon FD lenses for about two years, I was saving for future Sony lenses. Yes manual everything but also sharp. Have you ever thought of doing a compare of the FD to the FE lenses, just for grins? Good at night Yes, did my first lunar eclipse (blue hour) in 2014 with a Canon telephoto FD 80-200mm f/4 at 100mm with adapter 10-08-2014 Jekyll Island Ga. to the west.
I'm a Nikon shooter and probably will never own the 50 1.2. Having said that the Nikon 50 1.2 is HUGE and this is super small, in comparison. Just saw Manny Ortiz's video on this and it appears the quality of the image/video is on par with the Nikon.
I'd really like to see someone do a in-depth side by side review of both.
The lens is my dream lens. The only cons with this lens are 1) $2000 Price Tag and 2) Weight. This lens is heavier than the 16-35mm f2.8 GM lens.
Looks smooth. Definitely one to consider.
just own this super awesome lens for a month and really LOVE IT !
I'm thinking this mount is still a lot bigger than the F mount because it's flange distance is smaller
For me f/3.5 is wide open, mostly I shoot at f/8 or f/11. Paper-thin DOF is a detriment for my advertising and editorial work.
A good test, of a lens I'll never need. Will Sony ever make a Tilt & Shift lens, something that I often use?
I heard that it is really a 47mm lens and not a 50mm 1.2. Is that correct?
I would have preferred a cheaper, lighter f1.4 version
This kind of lens already exists especially from third parties, in fact sony already made one. G master is for professionals, they dont really care about the price of lenses
@@svenasmussen8745 the Planar f1.4 is old and cumbersome
Quite a bit smaller than the Nikon 50mm 1.2. Would love to see a comparison video!
Unfortunately I'm not gonna buy one any time soon at those prices 🙃
Awesome review! Super knowledgable paired with great test shots! Thanks for posting!
great review. thanks for the comparison against the 1.4 za.
Really looking forward to that sony vs canon 50 comparison! Nice work!
Kamlan 28mm f/1.4 has concave front element as well. Pretty decent apsc lens.
Hey Ted, have you noticed the electronic first curtain shutter eats the bottom half of the bokeh "circle" from around 1/1000 sec and faster? For those images I always switch back to full mechanical shutter. See 3:16 for reference. Manny Ortiz has a video on the topic. Really weird issue.
Great channel. I am so hard decision which one should i buy between New Sony fe 2424-70mm f2.8 Vs Sony fe 50mm f1.2 GM? Prime is great aperture and image quality and 24-70mm is versatile?
Trust me you will be much happier with the 50mm 1.2 and zoom with your feet
Looking forward to the comparison! Not only the photo side but how does the three lenses handle video autofocus.
Is the focusing smooth? Quiet? “Behaving” well for video, is there any focus breathing? Flare handling?
Thanks
How does this compare to the Sigma f/1.4? There is an extra glass in the 50mm GM which should make it more milky?
ANY LONG TERM REVIEW WITH THE SONY 50 F/1.2?
This lens is the reason why I didn’t buy the Nikon Z50mm f1.2 for my Nikon Z9. The Nikon version is waaaay too big to take out the house or keep mounted on your camera at all times. It also has this display window on the lens which I think is aesthetically not pleasing, at least not to me. I love the other Nikon Z prime lenses except the Nikon Z50mm f1.2. THIS Sony 50mm f1.2 looks amazing on the Nikon Z9 with the Megadapt ETZ21 that is practically invisible and from what I hear all the functions are flawless
Nikon engineers know very well that a system's maximum f/-stop is determined by FFD as well as by mount diameter. Sly devils! To Nikon's credit, they probably designed the Z mount to be able to house a medium format sensor. If that's true, I'm impressed that they are thinking ahead.
Very good review. Which other 2 lenses have the Nano II Coating technology?
I definitely want to see some test charts at 1.2 on the three lenses.
Too bad you don't still have the Noct on hand that'd be a fun point of comparison too
What is the cool looking Arca plate visible at 7:36?
Me sitting here with the 50mm ZA 1.4 contemplating the upgrade, AHHHHHH
It would be interesting to see how it compares to Fujifilm XF33F1.4 LM WR - how much better is it at almost 3 times the cost and twice the weight?
Great self portraits Ted.
Why everyone complain about focusbreathing? I tested it on the 85 Batis, 50 1.4 Minolta and they are breathing as well. Why nobody cared about before?
I'd love to see how this lens compares to Fujifulm 56mm F.12
Nikon shooter here. Not that I can afford any of the 1.2 primes by Sony, Canon and Nikon, kudos to Sony for pulling off quite a feat by making the lens noticeably smaller and lighter than the other two.
Comparison between Sony, Nikon and Sony New 1.2 lenses would be nice. Thank you for these and other videos.
I always find your videos impressive and rich in information... ! I have a Sonya7III and mostly use it for portraits and I am looking for an upgrade. Having said that, Ted would you recommend I upgrade to the SONY a7RIV?
Admit not interested in Nikon because I don't own one of their bodies now. Really like to understand the strengths and weakness of the 50/1.2 GM vs the RF 50/1.2 since I own a body from each. Was about to go out and buy the Canon until about a week ago until I heard about the Sony. So now I need to choose. IMHO Canon's RF f/2.8 zooms from 15-200 appear better than Sony's GM (which I own). Sony's primes now from 20-135 G/GM appear better than Canon's now that the 50/1.2GM has joined the family. Not that Canon's are not great at f/1.2 but they really only cover those two focal lengths with L series lenses. Thanks for your video. Always enjoy.
Nice review. What is the T-stop on this one? The ZA had 1.6.
I am a tattoo artist and take photos of my tattoos within a studio.
Would you recommend the sony 35mm 1.4 gm or the 50mm 1.2 gm? Thanks 🙂
So much would depend on how big your tattoos were and a number of other individual issues. Could you rent or borrow some lenses and check all this out?
Great review even with the( Nikon) slip at (1:41). I've preordered and I'm now waiting impatiently for May 13th. Thanks for the video.
ua-cam.com/video/AvnFH5c4kG8/v-deo.html 7:41 tell me please what lens did
you use for this video?
Was it Nikon or Canon with the front moving element? Now this Sony GM-50 is the best offering on the market.
Canon
As usual super good video !
Putting autofocus and price on the side, the real match or comparison test is with a Summilux 50 or even with Noctilux 50, isn’t it ?
Does this lens have a Concave or Convex front element? I think this lens is a redesign of the 55mm 1.8!
You answered my question at 4:30 lol!
By the way, at 1:46 you said you wished “Nikon would do a fifty, one-two, GMaster.” I believe you meant Sony?
5:07 I think we’re owed a comparison video 😄
Your review of this seems more glowing than your review of the Canon 50L? I look forward to seeing you do a review between them.
Stupid question, but is this lens worth the money? I'm just getting started but I know exactly what I want to shoot and I can't get it using the kit lens with the A7C. Any feedback is much appreciated. Thx.
Buy the best lens you can afford it’s an investment kick ass lenses like this 50mm 1.2 will never depreciate like your cameras
very nice video! will you make a comparison between canon 50 f1.2 and sony 50 f1,2??
Sample photos were great. As you do your tests, could you please include a reason(s) an enthusiast should buy it to replace his Rokkor 1.2 & 1.4 lenses on K&F Concept adapter? Reason(s) suitable for presentation to said enthusiast's wife preferred. Much thanks for informative videos...
Ted, Leica 0.95 with VM adapter or this one?
I mean, we all knew it was coming, but that was fast!
Some of my best street shots were on 50mm, I later moved to 35mm so I could get a little more air around my street subjects, and I find it matches my naked eye perception better, the camera becomes a better extension of my eye... That being said, the 50mm is my second best length. PS: I now shoot with the equivalent of a 40mm on my GFX system.
You should put ZA zeiss in your title because I have been looking for a comparison and nobody has it yet.
“….. only from the Mind of Minolta.” 😎
So, you said next video compares 50 1.2. Where is it?)
that slip of the tongue at 1:41 :D
did you have time to work on the comparison video ?
Agree! your self portraits look much better @4. I own the sexy Zeiss Batis 85mm 1.8 fave for portraits and 50mm 1.4 zeiss sony mount is my go to lens for whatever.
Could you please make a video exclusively about this lens for video (and/or cinema) work? How good is it for talking head UA-cam videos? Thanks so much matey! 🏆