Inslee reacts to bump stock decision

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, a gun accessory that allows semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns and was used in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
    The high court found 6-3 the Trump administration did not follow federal law when it reversed course and banned bump stocks after a gunman in Las Vegas attacked a country music festival with assault rifles in 2017. He fired more than 1,000 rounds in the crowd in 11 minutes, leaving 60 people dead and injuring hundreds more.
    Read more: www.king5.com/article/news/na...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 118

  • @joeb465
    @joeb465 13 днів тому +12

    Inslee can't even talk in this video without sounding like he's drunk

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 12 днів тому

      Did Fox News tell you that. Does Fox News favor mass murders in America?

  • @dan7163
    @dan7163 14 днів тому +13

    Incorrect description of bump stock. It takes multiple trigger cycles to fire. It is just a way of making each trigger pull faster. Nothing at all on the weapon has been modified.
    Only the stock has been changed to allow bumping.
    For those few, the Stock is like the wooden part you see on rifles

  • @juancarrillo4547
    @juancarrillo4547 14 днів тому +9

    So Jay. How’s the AR15 ban holding off? 😂

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +3

      Pretty soon the weapons are going to be more advanced.

  • @BigfooteXpert9000
    @BigfooteXpert9000 14 днів тому +22

    I don’t care what Jay thinks. He needs to go away and stop trampling our 2nd amendment rights

  • @cook4470
    @cook4470 13 днів тому +4

    Inslee has no idea why they made this decision. Those who brought the case said it turned a gun into a machine gun - and that is false. They simply brought a defeated claim.

  • @dmpi483
    @dmpi483 14 днів тому +19

    Trump's Supreme court rules against Trump's bill and Inslee still complains.

    • @youtubesnamingpolicysucks
      @youtubesnamingpolicysucks 14 днів тому +1

      Inslee would complain about rain being wet. He's a 3 time presidential candidate FAILURE. We can only hope the current AG doesn't become the next governor of WA 🙏

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +1

      I don’t have anything to complain about but I like to give humans a hard time.

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 12 днів тому

      Huh?

  • @leolldankology
    @leolldankology 14 днів тому +6

    Vote 🗳 hom out.

  • @corvetteguy1980
    @corvetteguy1980 12 днів тому +1

    Jay doesn’t like anyone having the means to protect themselves especially when he lets criminals run rampant.

  • @user-ho9bh4mt3v
    @user-ho9bh4mt3v 13 днів тому

    Seems like politicians are scared. Take their security away. Defend yourself and save money

  • @carebear2272
    @carebear2272 14 днів тому +2

    Protection is the word of the day, Inslee is all about, personal protection, the unborn child protection and job protection? I didn’t get that last one quite right, what ever he meant about pollution?

  • @dubsie2209
    @dubsie2209 14 днів тому +7

    seattle's had the same amount of roads since the 90s. their tax revenue has multiplied multiple times since then. the roads are even worse now. enough said. so glad I left this place for Arizona. best decision I ever made

    • @TT-qo9dv
      @TT-qo9dv 14 днів тому +1

      Just in Seattle in may. The roads are fine.

  • @larrygood5977
    @larrygood5977 12 днів тому

    Falsehood or mistake? The Vegas shooter possessed bumpstocks, but didn't use them in that incident.
    Bump stocks are not machine guns. They don't make multiple rounds fire with on trigger pull.
    They are a forced reset device. They make the trigger reset faster, and if the shooter keeps pressure on the trigger during the forced reset, it will trigger again. It is still a separate action that doesn't meet the federal definiton of a machine gun ... which by the way, are NOT banned, just restricted to pre-existing ones in the civilian, market, unconstitutionally restricted via chicanery in the way the original case was presented to SCOTUS after the plaintiff was deceased.

  • @michaelstjohn6086
    @michaelstjohn6086 12 днів тому

    PLZ BAN MURDER

  • @nwmacguy
    @nwmacguy 13 днів тому

    tired: bump stocks for $100+
    wired: 3D printed (and very illegal) auto-sears for pennies
    *Those* are what law enforcement is rightly focused on, not bump stocks. The ban-overturn is a nothing burger.

  • @shaunbillerbeck-tb9bm
    @shaunbillerbeck-tb9bm 11 днів тому

    Jay slow down with your scare tactics. It's called preemtion under article VI paragraph 2.

  • @DrDangerPuppy
    @DrDangerPuppy 12 днів тому

    SHALL NOT INFRINGE!

  • @txoilfield
    @txoilfield 14 днів тому +4

    Dear Jay. **** a big ol' bag of them.

  • @user-rf9lt1rq9v
    @user-rf9lt1rq9v 14 днів тому +10

    Ya Jay you’re really doing a stand up job of protecting WA citizens lolololol

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +3

      Better than you 👽🤟🏻

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +1

      With your loser fruitcake @$$

    • @th4759
      @th4759 14 днів тому +4

      @@nerobaal6655
      😂 did you seriously respond with that comment?? 😂
      That’s the equivalent of “I know you are but what am I”!! 🤣🤣🫵🫵🤣🤣
      Tell me what Inslee has done to make life better in Wa state! I’ll wait.

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +4

      @@th4759 That’s not at all the same and I feel bad for you.

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому

      @@th4759 That’s guys is just bring a little mockery bird. You both talk out your A holes. You both literally make the world a terrible place to live in.

  • @MM-sf3rl
    @MM-sf3rl 13 днів тому

    America is sick

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 12 днів тому

      You're right and Donald Trump has taken advantage of it.

  • @jameskarllipscomb2948
    @jameskarllipscomb2948 14 днів тому +1

    Ok? What's the purpose of a bump stock? Why is it necessary?

    • @th4759
      @th4759 14 днів тому +5

      Doesn’t matter WHY. It’s a right.
      Why do you say the F word. What is the purpose? Same answer … it doesn’t matter WHY. It’s a right.

    • @RighteousJ
      @RighteousJ 14 днів тому +4

      It's necessary precisely because you're asking that question.

    • @M21PREDATOR
      @M21PREDATOR 14 днів тому +2

      The federal definition of a machine gun is any weapon that shoots automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. By definition a bump stock is not a machine gun therefore the ATF cannot regulate it. they can't just redefine what it is to be a machine gun when congress has already defined what is a machine gun and it's not necessary it's fun and its constitutionally legal just like flamethrowers and tanks or did you not know that you as a citizen can own those too.

    • @daveadock2874
      @daveadock2874 14 днів тому +3

      Okay, what is the purpose of you writing a comment on UA-cam? Why is it necessary? I'm sure you could live without it. but maybe some believe it is a civil right. Bump stocks shouldn't be denied by poorly written non-legislative actions by a government agency that doesn't have the authority to do such a ban.

    • @RighteousJ
      @RighteousJ 14 днів тому

      @@daveadock2874 wait until they find out what Washington's directive was regarding the implementation of 2A, let alone that literally every able-bodied citizen is "the militia" being referenced.

  • @ironwill8596
    @ironwill8596 14 днів тому +6

    If the Supreme Court says it is legal and no state is allowed to impose its own ban on it read your Constitution

    • @daveadock2874
      @daveadock2874 14 днів тому

      Sorry to say it but state legislatures do have that authority unless they are voted out of office and a new legislature is voted in that can change the previous enacted law. Bump stock bans in Washington state will live on forever in this state.

    • @gotsloco1810
      @gotsloco1810 14 днів тому +1

      @@daveadock2874
      18USC241 and 242. If we get a new Attorney General maybe he will prosecute those violating our civil rights.

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому

      Some horrifying things are legal especially if you know how to word it.

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому

      You can use laws to define a word and reappoint new people to appoint laws that change it to the opposite meaning.

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому

      As soon as you can do that you can make the law say whatever you want it to say. Especially if no one is smart enough to debate you.

  • @joeb465
    @joeb465 13 днів тому

    hahahahaha!!! 150.00 dollar voucher's !

  • @D3IVIO7V
    @D3IVIO7V 13 днів тому

    You're next Jay.

  • @joshwebb1493
    @joshwebb1493 12 днів тому

    Just like a Democrat to confuse legal ownership of weapons to pollution. That is the most ignorant thing I’ve ever heard.

  • @kenpachikenpo2697
    @kenpachikenpo2697 14 днів тому +8

    Any type of ban or restrictions on firearms is unconstitutional. Period.

    • @maxiboy2704
      @maxiboy2704 14 днів тому

      Yep and people will still get killed by guns in America by selfish Americans with “free gun rights”

  • @massdebation
    @massdebation 14 днів тому

    SCROTUS

  • @andriaharris5955
    @andriaharris5955 14 днів тому +5

    Too bad Governor

    • @nerobaal6655
      @nerobaal6655 14 днів тому +1

      The government and social media providers encourage mass gun violence and child exploitation.