The best plane for a TIGHT BUDGET!? Piper Archer II Walkaround & Flight

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • Michael takes over the reins and does a walkaround and flight in the Piper Archer II. The Archer is a common step up from the Cherokee basic trainer and many pilots have time in the no-nonsense, simple Archer. Is the Archer the perfect GA airplane? With it's fixed pitch and fixed gear, it's a true 4-place touring aeroplane.
    If you liked this video, please give us a THUMBS UP and a SUBSCRIBE. It really helps! We love making these videos and we've got some great content coming up for you guys. We've got Stretched Cherokees, Stretched Cessnas, and even a little something from the 1950's coming your way! Plus a whole host of more cool aircraft and destinations planned!
    Massive thanks to our two sponsors:
    Command Flight Training - flycommand.com.au
    If you'd like to SPONSOR us, get in contact!
    Facebook: / deadstickadv. .
    Instagram: / deadstickad. .
    0:00 Intro
    1:05 Exterior
    4:22 Interior
    6:55 Take-off
    7:28 Flying
    9:31 Landing
    10:05 Outro
    Filmed by:
    / onecastmedia
    #Cherokee #Piper #PrivatePilot
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 114

  • @outermarker
    @outermarker 2 роки тому +21

    Even though I do prefer the 172 (and high wings in general) in some ways, I really love the Archer II. Lots of space, useful load and relatively fast. But my favorite feature that really sets it apart from the 172 in my opinion is the rudder trim! During long cross-countries you can basically fly it hands and feet off even without an autopilot.
    Enjoyed the video!

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому +2

      I agree! Rudder trim makes a big difference on long cross country. Less tiring for sure ^Michael

    • @chrisnedbalek2866
      @chrisnedbalek2866 Рік тому +2

      Do the older cherokees also have rudder trim?

    • @bruce2357
      @bruce2357 11 місяців тому

      I learned to fly in Warriors and Archers and had a buddy that was checked out in the Saratoga.
      One day he let me handle the takeoff and I was shocked at the right rudder forces required after rotation.
      I guess he saw that maybe I was grimacing a little and asked me if I wanted some rudder trim to which I immediately replied yes and he took care of that for me.

    • @aileronsintowind6835
      @aileronsintowind6835 8 місяців тому

      @@chrisnedbalek2866yes bud

  • @azcharlie2009
    @azcharlie2009 Рік тому +2

    I bought my 1979 Archer II in 1985. I still have it today. Still less than 1500 hours TT. KNS80, KX170B, century IIIB autopilot IFR. Even the ADF still works. The original paint had to be replaced in 2006 because of a sand storm here in Arizona. But, almost everything is still original. I'd love to update the avionics, but.... the expense is beyond ridiculous. I don't have many more flying years left. It will make someone a very nice airplane..... Someday....

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому

      Sounds beautiful! I bet it’s like a blast from the past with all the original avionics. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +10

    I love the Archer II and would love to have it to purchase

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому +2

      There are plenty around still Bernard. Just keep a lookout! ^MP

  • @TENpilot
    @TENpilot 10 місяців тому +3

    From personal experience I can say that it is a fantastic plane.

  • @trevormorgan8423
    @trevormorgan8423 Рік тому

    Really fantastic video!

  • @capt_yeti
    @capt_yeti 2 роки тому +5

    I love my Archer. Beautiful to fly and easy to land. 💙

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому +1

      Agreed! They’re lovely

    • @jaredcook7275
      @jaredcook7275 Рік тому

      Debating purchasing one... I was looking at it or finishing my RV-14 build. Big difference between the two

  • @claudeelementalist
    @claudeelementalist 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing video as always guys and great production value! Great on Ash for snagging a gig flying regionals and will be missed, but great content regardless from Michael!
    Looking forward to the next video!

  • @catofaviation4281
    @catofaviation4281 Рік тому +3

    Love the Archer II.
    I once flew in it and is flies so good and stable.
    Keep on making this great video's!
    They are fun to watch and educational.

  • @coriscotupi
    @coriscotupi 5 місяців тому +1

    Good video.
    The Archer is my favorite GA airplane, followed closely by the Arrow.
    The stabilator + anti-servo tab was a genius idea. Aerodynamic forces from the tab acting on the stabilator actively "fly" the stabilator, actually commanding the airplane to its trimmed airspeed. As a result it nails the airspeed hands-off, and requires a substantial force on the yoke to fly above - or below - trimmed airspeed. You won't get caught off guard at the wrong speed with those airplanes.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  4 місяці тому +1

      Thanks! Yes brilliant design. We’ve got an Arrow IV video coming out shortly. Also a T Tail Lance

  • @chantszkan1503
    @chantszkan1503 2 роки тому

    VH-MAU is the aircraft that renews my PPL at Murray Bridge. Bravo

  • @BravoJulietWhiskey
    @BravoJulietWhiskey Рік тому

    Love the Archer II!

  • @hankbrown2871
    @hankbrown2871 5 місяців тому +1

    Very nice production. And a good looking airplane! Our flying club in Eastern Pennsylvania owns three Archers. And I learned to fly in an Archer II.

  • @DarrenMiles
    @DarrenMiles Рік тому +1

    Outstanding review! I'm training in a modern 100i which is basically the same plane and for what it is, it's pretty impressive! Thank you for the video!

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому +1

      Awesome! I saw one of those at Oshkosh. Perfect plane to learn in! Thanks for watching and commenting!

  • @aviacaoesimulacao
    @aviacaoesimulacao 2 роки тому

    What a nice video. I love the Archer!

  • @danielschachle2054
    @danielschachle2054 2 роки тому

    Love my Archer, you're right

  • @magniljaa1
    @magniljaa1 7 місяців тому +1

    Agree!

  • @jamesralph4447
    @jamesralph4447 Рік тому

    Lovely aeroplane.

  • @alexlefevre6492
    @alexlefevre6492 2 роки тому

    Great video as usual!

  • @chrisnedbalek2866
    @chrisnedbalek2866 Рік тому +5

    I like your analysis of the marginal gas cost ($200 more) of getting there (on a 300 nm leg) 20 minutes earlier. You also could have mentioned the long run greater cost of overhauling a 6 cyl versus a 4 cylinder. Good job Mate!

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for the kind words! Yes good point, the overhaul costs are much kinder. Not to mention the fixed pitch propeller!

    • @hordi1ful
      @hordi1ful Рік тому

      Yes, but if you fly longer the same distance - you have to overhaul an engine sooner.

  • @kimskislalom
    @kimskislalom 10 місяців тому +1

    Nice airplane. Yes, it is easy to fly and smooth. Will be an airplane that I will consider.

  • @rodolfocastro3222
    @rodolfocastro3222 Рік тому +1

    Great video, keep them coming. What about the Mooney M20J? Would be great to see a video on that! Thanks!

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому +1

      Hmmm I think we’ve got access to a Mooney! Let me see what we can do!

  • @edjarrett3164
    @edjarrett3164 Рік тому +3

    I really like the archer2. I just finished my PPL and am working for instrument rating. The school only has 2 instrument equipped aircraft, so I decided to get checked out in the archer. I have previous military hours in various aircraft. Compared to the Cessna 172, The archer is way more stable because of the stabilator. It doesn’t wallow on final like the Cessna, but is an KIAS vs MPH aircraft. Energy management is more critical to see same performance as the Cessna. Ventilation and access is not as good as the Cessna, but I’ll take the performance and stability any day.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому +1

      Congrats on the PPL! The archer would be a perfect plane for getting your instrument in. They’re so stable as you know

  • @stephenreese5921
    @stephenreese5921 2 роки тому +1

    Agree! The Piper Archer is the best GA single engine, other then a TBM or PC-12.

  • @piper0428
    @piper0428 Рік тому +1

    Love to fly the PA 28 181!

  • @Brutaga
    @Brutaga 2 роки тому

    I was flying into Queenstown airport NZ and my wife started feeling ill, turns out she was pregnant with our beautiful daughter. So I’ve always had a soft spot for the 180 Archer, (ZK-EIV) your video brought back lots of good memories.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому

      What a great memory Howard! You’ll never forget that moment. ^Michael

  • @lcprivatepilot1969
    @lcprivatepilot1969 10 місяців тому +1

    If I ever get a low wing, it will have two doors.
    Thanks for the video!

  • @AussieAircraft98
    @AussieAircraft98 2 роки тому

    Top video again! I almost agree with you, but i reckon id go a Cherokee 180 just for that Hershey bar wing

    • @CreepinCreeper145
      @CreepinCreeper145 2 роки тому

      Same, plus the Hershey bar wing allows for slightly higher cruise speeds below 9500, which is where most of these Archer II's and Cherokee 180's are gonna fly unless if you have to cross over mountainous terrain, where the speed advantage crosses over to the semi-tapered wing over 10000'.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому

      Having flown a bunch of models with both wings, I reckon Hershey is my fav now too ^Michael

    • @chrisnedbalek2866
      @chrisnedbalek2866 Рік тому

      Why do you guys like the Hershey wing better?

    • @blackprince291
      @blackprince291 Рік тому

      @@chrisnedbalek2866 Short landings. The tapered wing models float. The hershey bar wings allow a steep descent into a short strip with power off and full flaps.

    • @chrisnedbalek2866
      @chrisnedbalek2866 Рік тому

      @@blackprince291 thank you!

  • @russellrattys6581
    @russellrattys6581 Рік тому +1

    I flew one of these on wednesday 29th june 2022 for my trial/demo flight, its a brilliant aircraft, the flight was very turbulent, but me and the archer handled it really well, the pilot took off, handed me the controls, and i flew it until it was time to land, then he took over, got into the circuit, did a go-around because of traffic, then did another pattern and landed
    It was an awesome experience, its a very intuitive aircraft, wanna climb? push the throttle up full, wanna descend? pull the throttle down to idle, wanna cruise level? put the throttle about half way up, really easy
    The controls are very responsive, but not scary responsive, there not so light you could breath on the controls and it flips you over, but there not so heavy that your forcing the yoke round either to get it to do something
    One thing i would like to see is a door on the port side, but hey ho? you get what your given

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому

      Awesome! Glad you enjoyed your Demo flight. Archers are a perfect aircraft to learn in and fly privately. Roomy, comfortable and they perform really well. Also super easy to land nicely!

    • @russellrattys6581
      @russellrattys6581 Рік тому

      @@DeadstickAdventures me too, i got my class 2 medical, paid my membership for the flying club, and booked my first official flying lesson in 4 days time
      They got warriors, and someone there said its slightly easier to learn in a warrior than it is an archer, he said the landing config is slightly different between the two for that airfield 🤷‍♂️

  • @spiro5327
    @spiro5327 2 роки тому +1

    Great video though i prefer the 172, easier to get in and out of, with 2 doors gravity fed fuel and i prefer the electric flap on the panel rather than the car handbrake style flap lever. Having to reach up on top of the wing to do a fuel check is 1 downside though. Both great planes nonetheless. Thanks

  • @rogerb4436
    @rogerb4436 2 роки тому +3

    I like them over the Cessna but I don't like just the 1 door.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому +3

      Yeah I agree Roger, score a point for Cessna there, the 2 doors make in-out easier ^Michael

  • @Cherfield-D-Blessedman
    @Cherfield-D-Blessedman Рік тому +1

    Nice video, thanks. If we have to upgrade the instrument like G650 Xi how much would cost us?

  • @nelsoncolon4535
    @nelsoncolon4535 2 роки тому

    I am an instrument-rated private pilot from the United States. All of my time was in Cessna 172s. I can not wait to fly a Piper Archer/Warrior/Cherokee.

  • @walky000atgmail3
    @walky000atgmail3 2 роки тому +1

    Great job Michael, and great production quality. Very cool that Ash scored a job flying regionals.
    I agree an Archer is a great lower cost GA aircraft, decent speed, simple operation, good fuel economy and robust, but...When compared to the PA-28-235 yes, you do use somewhat more fuel for the same given flight however 4 fat bastards/bitches won't be going far in an Archer where the 235 will take them all, their beer, and full 84 gal tanks.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 роки тому

      Thanks mate, appreciate the support! Yeh we’re all stoked for him. Haha you’re right, depends on the size of your family/friends as to 235/archer!! Lol ^Michael

  • @mp-xt2rg
    @mp-xt2rg 9 місяців тому +1

    I have a 65 172 it has just over 900lbs of useful load and cruises at 125mph range is limited with 38 gallons of fuel.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  9 місяців тому

      Sounds like a great aircraft! I love the older 172s. Thanks for watching our videos :)

  • @timothystockman7533
    @timothystockman7533 Рік тому +1

    My favorite airplane! Back in the day I flew N47394 from Aretz Flying Service. Yours even has the same color scheme: white with red and gold!

  • @scottymac2260
    @scottymac2260 2 роки тому

    Now time to compare Warrior versus Archer

  • @craigcampbell5937
    @craigcampbell5937 Рік тому +1

    Your thoughts on a Mooney?

  • @kimberlywentworth9160
    @kimberlywentworth9160 11 місяців тому +1

    What is your field elevation and Pressure / density altitude. 700 Feet per minute at sea level?

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  10 місяців тому +1

      Airfield elevation is 120’. Was probably around 20 degrees C

  • @1krr
    @1krr 8 місяців тому +1

    There isn't much that offers a better value than the pa-28-180,181!

  • @jeas5484
    @jeas5484 3 місяці тому +1

    Hello my friend
    Do you have an autopilot on board ?

  • @dianeneedleman5154
    @dianeneedleman5154 6 місяців тому

    How about landing/braking distances? I heard that braking was not so strong

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  6 місяців тому

      Braking is as good as any other PA28. I’ve noticed no issues.

  • @JM-bu7cf
    @JM-bu7cf 3 місяці тому +1

    You could get like 14-15 corvettes with 7000 horsepower for the price of some single engine airplanes.

  • @matts4025
    @matts4025 Рік тому

    But I did hit an eagle in Canada and that probably would've ripped that landing gear off ahah. 6ft wing span

  • @matts4025
    @matts4025 Рік тому

    Awh poor Galah, That makes me sad as an American lmfao.. Beautiful birds. Australia is amazing. My 27 y/o cockatiel died on new years and I him dearly lol

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  Рік тому +1

      Aww that’s sad to hear! Yep it sucks hitting birds but unfortunately all part of it 😬

    • @matts4025
      @matts4025 Рік тому

      @@DeadstickAdventures Definitely with all the birds you guys have! Thanks for the reply. Take care brotha.

  • @kimberlywentworth9160
    @kimberlywentworth9160 11 місяців тому +1

    Seems like the older Pipers are better than the new Pipers

  • @mafp22w
    @mafp22w 2 місяці тому

    I had a 235. I planned for 14 gallons an hour, not 17. I think 17 is high.

    • @DeadstickAdventures
      @DeadstickAdventures  2 місяці тому

      17gph power setting kept it to around 135 TAS. You could get it lower but it lost a lot of speed!

  • @davejohn3820
    @davejohn3820 2 роки тому +1

    The fuel pump was off on final...

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +1

    Take off the nose gear pants to make it look better

  • @toddkallenbach3904
    @toddkallenbach3904 2 місяці тому +1

    the best plane for a tight budget is NO plane at all

  • @Jay-hr3rh
    @Jay-hr3rh 11 місяців тому +1

    Why would anyone want to purchase an airplane on a tight budget?

  • @georgiathai4961
    @georgiathai4961 Рік тому +2

    If the budget is tight don’t buy an airplane!