Fixing Your Branch Line: Atlantic City Line

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2022
  • Since last episode's honorable mention was a branch line that was shared by New Jersey Transit, might as well pick up where I left off and focus this episode on the only commuter railroad of New Jersey. Of course, as the only branch that's technically isolated from other commuter rail lines in NJT, I decided to review it for standing out in the crowd. But upon further research, I learned that despite its standalone position in the commuter rail system, the Atlantic City Branch has one of the most unique histories of any branch on the entire railroad, as well as some of the most pressing geographic right of way challenges while entering Philadelphia, which resulted in various suggestions based on each possible route (some of which you may not be particularly fond of, but opinions of these suggestions are welcome).
    Credit for all photos used go to their original photographers
    All music used in this video is from the UA-cam Audio Library.
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976: allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
    fmnut: / fmnut
    South Jersey Rail Productions: / southjerseyrailproduct...
    Bob Vogel: chuchubob.rrpicturearchives.net/
    NJ Transit GP40PH-2B 4216 waits to pull Train 4622 - By Adam E. Moreira - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index... City, New Jersey 2007 - By Bob Jagendorf from Manalapan, NJ, USA - Atlantic City From The Air, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Coney Island as seen from the pier in June 2016. - By MusikAnimal - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Las Vegas Strip2 - By BrendelSignature at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Cherry Hill station in December 2011 - By Adam Moss from Macomb, IL, United States - GEDC1824, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    3rd tallest lighthouse in the U.S. - By Shannon McGee from Huntsville, USA - Absecon Lighthouse, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    A train at the station in 1969 - By David Wilson from Oak Park, Illinois, USA - 19690104 22 PATCO @ City Hall Station, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    NJT 5166 on Atlantic City Line train passing Haddonfield station - By Sturmovik at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Ben Franklin Br - Train Crossing - By Michael Murphy - originally posted to Flickr as Ben Franklin Br - Train Crossing, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    A westbound PATCO train approaching Philadelphia on the Ben Franklin Bridge, September 2018 - By Michael Stokes - DSC_0581, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    The PATCO Broadway station (part of the Walter Rand Transportation Center) in April 2015 - By Adam Moss from Macomb, IL, United States - Broadway Station, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Anthracite Coal - By Amcyrus2012 - Own work, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal - View from helicopter - By Benjamin KRAFT - Central railroad New Jersey terminal, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Music Used in Order:
    Greaser - TrackTribe
    Rest Easy - Vans in Japan
    Old Berlin - United States Marine Band
    Cheerleader - Quincas Moreira
    Sunshine on Sand - Unicorn Heads
    No Good Right - Freedom Trail Studios
    Illusions - Anno Domini Beats
    The Place Inside - Silent Partner
    Potato Deal - Craig MacArthur
    River Changes - Freedom Trail Studios

КОМЕНТАРІ • 228

  • @frankjonathan8043
    @frankjonathan8043 Рік тому +91

    The track at Haddonfield, along with Patco, were put below ground level because the town did not want it to be an eyesore. Haddonfield did not want an elevated track.

    • @de-fault_de-fault
      @de-fault_de-fault Рік тому +48

      Didn't want to spoil the view of that huge park and ride lot?

    • @allaboardarizonaaaaz842
      @allaboardarizonaaaaz842 Рік тому +9

      Once the line was built, both Collingswood and Haddon Township wished they had screamed as loud as Haddonfield did.

    • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
      @centredoorplugsthornton4112 Рік тому

      To a extent Haddonfield didn't want PATCO at all. They thought it would fail in a matter of months. Haddonfield also has a record of HARRASSMENT of NJ Transit bus operations.

    • @edmundanderson657
      @edmundanderson657 Рік тому +9

      @@allaboardarizonaaaaz842 If they did the speedline probably wouldn't exist. The cost to depress the track in haddonfield almost put an end to it. I've heard the cost but to long ago.

    • @Ben-go1iq
      @Ben-go1iq Рік тому +7

      What is it with American railfans and their incecwbt need for double tracks, you can run a perfectly good commuter service up to every 20min in most of the world with a single track line, it’s not like every station needs 2 platforms. Stop complaining about infrastructure when you’re main problem is the unwillingness to try new services. In Europe, if a new line is wanted, a way will be found to run a service, in the Us, Everything needs to be perfect before even considering a 4x daily train.

  • @ridesharegold6659
    @ridesharegold6659 Рік тому +6

    I used to live next to the Ashland PATCO station and then the Collingwood PATCO station. I've been a regular on that train in the summer for 20 years. I'm also a planner with background on former and current funding and long term plans.
    Here's the thing, No one lives in the Pine Barrens and new development isn't allowed. There won't be big rail demand there. On top of that AC is a small city and the station is kind of a far walk from the Boardwalk.
    So, how to fix the line? New station at ACY airport, new stop at Woodcrest, new station at Merchantville. All trains stop at North Philly. Double tracking where possible to allow for hourly headways - . The only really constrained areas are the trench in haddonfield and the area between Woodcrest and Ashland station. During the AM peak add two extra inbound trains that only run from Atco to 30th St. Do the same thing in the PM. University City is a huge trip generator with no easy access from South Jersey. Eliminating ACRL access from South Jersey to West Philly in my opinion is just stupid.
    All the ACRL needs is better frequency and two new stations to generate trips. Stopping trains at the existing North Philly station better connects the ACRL to the rest of the regional rail network and a new stop at Woidcrest takes advantage of the massive park & ride with direct interstate access.

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  Рік тому +2

      Thank you for sharing your insight. I didn't focus on it as much in favor of the more visible track spacing issue, but increased frequency is definitely a way to improve service not only on the ACL but also on any passenger line.

    • @KE-mu5mj
      @KE-mu5mj 2 місяці тому +3

      @@Pensyfan19 The biggest current drawbacks to increasing service are 1) the frequent delays due to bridge openings on the Delair Bridge; and 2) the lack of interest in spending limited transportation dollars on rail line with limited ridership.

  • @LionkingCMSL
    @LionkingCMSL Рік тому +37

    If it wasn't addressed before there is one major problem with using the Ben Franklin Bridge for heavy rail: It was never designed for that type of rail use. It was designed and built for subway-type trains, which is why the tunnels on both sides are as tight as they are, as the "Bridge Line" operated over it before PATCO was built.

    • @legojayman
      @legojayman 11 місяців тому +2

      In 2026, that bridge will be 100 years old. Nothing lasts forever, they will have to build a new bridge eventually. Let's hope they will be more ambitious

    • @LionkingCMSL
      @LionkingCMSL 11 місяців тому +2

      @@legojayman Replacing the bridge, which won't happen, does not address the size of the tunnels nor the sharpness of the curves designed for subway type of operation. If you ever rode PATCO into Philly you'd realize how sharp some of those curves are and how tight the tunnel clearances are.
      Short of ripping up the western part of Camden and parts of eastern Philly and rebuilding those tunnels/curves there is no way to fit a full-size train there, not to mention the ventilation needed for the diesel exhaust.

  • @thetrainhopper8992
    @thetrainhopper8992 Рік тому +52

    My guess about the trench is that a group of people near the station screamed so loud the political world stopped turning. The same thing happens here in California when BART wants to convert parking lots into apartments. At least some of the time. My BART Board member even ran on a position of banning these conversions and sat on the Capitol Corridor JPA. She makes me die inside just a little bit.

    • @davidriccio1983
      @davidriccio1983 Рік тому +7

      That is a reasonable assumption when you consider that Haddonfield is a very wealthy town. If there is opposition to any project, it won’t be happening

    • @TheLIRRFrenchie...
      @TheLIRRFrenchie... Рік тому +3

      Yea I used to live in the bay, and Bart TOD was such a big deal. Thankfully, they have been changing that especially with the recent announcement of thousands of units at the North San Jose / berryessa BART station where they plan upwards of 30,000 units of housing and retail. Fruitvale also did a great job with its TOD, and I believe the final phase is finishing out now. The same can be said for many BART stations though if you look around the system to be honest.

    • @johnchambers8528
      @johnchambers8528 Рік тому +3

      The Atlantic City line as is is not that bad. I have ridden it from both Philadelphia and the Cheery Hill station. Yes there is that problem with the single track through Haddonfield and other areas. However they had no problem operating Amtrak trains that did not stop at the local New Jersey stations as well as the local NJT trains with minimal delays. There are several long passing sidings along the line so additional frequency service can be added. I did ride the old PRSL RDC trains that only operated to Lindenwald and required a transfer to the PATCO line to get to Philadelphia. The new direct service while slower was a great improvement to the Philadelphia riders as you now had easy transfers to Amtrak or SEPTA commuter trains or the subway services at 30th street. All your plans require massive capital expense while additional frequency service over the existing line can be started with minimal planning and added expense. The passengers also still have the option to transfer to PATCO to access other points in New Jersey or Philadelphia with no additional capital improvements.

    • @Joesolo13
      @Joesolo13 Рік тому +3

      @@johnchambers8528 Yea you couldn't easily get like, hourly service out of it without more passing sidings, but there's hardly demand for that anyway. A bit of upgrading and a few extra sidings and you could get a decent service on it.

  • @steveosuch5486
    @steveosuch5486 Рік тому +8

    I think you need to include reopening the route to Cape May New Jersey and Zoo Park locations. This would also lead to opening up Millville and Vineland with more traffic instead of just a historic line. Almost all the track from RT 55 to Millville has been updated and replaced by the Seashore Line. This line also opens up additional routes as the coal trains no longer use this - as the power plant was converted. The biggest mistake and leave it to New Jersey was a high speed line should have been added to the Parkway construction from Cape May to New York.

  • @richierodriguez8204
    @richierodriguez8204 Рік тому +31

    Imagine...a unrealistic alternate reality in which the CNJ gained LIRR style state takeover from New Jersey for its commuters services. While NJT does its job covering parts of New Jersey a lot of the CNJ lines covered parts of Jersey that are neglected now. With its growth Bayonne could use a connection to the rest of Jersey along with Communipaw as a Hudson Terminal which would alleviate congestion, southern Jersey is also neglected especially on the eastern side and CNJ would cover that better than its successor in NJT.

    • @de-fault_de-fault
      @de-fault_de-fault Рік тому +6

      CNJ had already killed off most of its services before the state stepped in, which was the problem. CNJ and its successor Conrail had already abandoned some lines, and the ones Conrail was using without having to make room for passenger service, it wasn't all that keen to start sharing again. NJT has more or less stayed the course running the one (or two if you count the NJCL) CNJ line it did inherit, aside from truncating it to High Bridge instead of Phillipsburg. The bridge to Bayonne was demolished in 1980 under Conrail ownership but it would definitely be more useful now than it was in the late '70s.

    • @kenw7287
      @kenw7287 Рік тому +2

      The problem with rebuilding the old CNJ line back to Communipaw is that the line would use the right of way used by the HBLR. Also, Communipaw is a poorly sited terminal as it is blocked off by the rest of Jersey City by I-78 and water. Liberty State Park is now located on the site and you would never be able to convince the general public to rebuild a train station on parkland.

    • @henryostman5740
      @henryostman5740 Рік тому +3

      The CNJ closed long before Conrail or even Penn Central, actually this might have been seen of the coming future of regional railroads. The CNJ, LV, DLW, and the SuzieQ all derived a lot of their revenue from hauling coal from PA into industrial markets in the east, will all of the cheap oil at the end of WW2 this traffic disappeared and westbound traffic out of the manufacturing centers in NJ and NYC also started drying up. Aside from its unprofitable passenger services, the CNJ became a freight shuttle service for low value items, the high value stuff moved to the trucks on all the new highways that had been built,. Couple the passenger losses with the high cost of operating in NJ, a lot of which was local property taxes, it's amazing that it stayed in business as long as it did. At the time of its demise there was little precedent for a state takeover, later on that attitude would change. When the private railways asked for fare increases they either got nothing or nickels and dimes, but when the states took it over fares have gone up big time at the same time as taxpayer subsidies have gone up as well.

  • @de-fault_de-fault
    @de-fault_de-fault Рік тому +10

    The RVL's limiting factor in service isn't the fact it's mostly double-tracked rather than quad-tracked since the early '90s. It's not even the single-track Aldene ramp to the Lehigh line east of Cranford (which there's plenty of room to double-track if they wanted). The real pinch point is the connection between the Lehigh line and the NEC at Hunter interlocking. It's double-tracked, but it only feeds into track 4 of the NEC, which is designed for westbound running. So inbound trains have to be timed to slot into the NEC traffic accordingly. An example of how delicate this balance is: the inbound train I ride daily now sits for 6+ minutes at Hunter waiting for an outbound RVL train AND, almost insultingly, a deadhead equipment move, to pass onto the Lehigh line so we can proceed toward Newark via track 4 and then onto the two-way track 5 when it starts closer to Newark Penn Station. This started because the outbound train's departure was pushed back, and that happened because its nominal connection from New York was pushed back a few minutes in the newest timetable to accommodate construction at Elizabeth on the NEC. A flyover at Hunter that will allow inbound RVL traffic to access the actual eastbound NEC tracks is in NJT's capital plan, and would solve a lot of this (And yes, some RVL trains currently access the "inbound" side of Newark Penn, but they have to cross all the other tracks at grade to get there...not great). Combined with upcoming NEC improvements (Portal Bridge, Gateway, etc.) the Hunter flyover would make increased service on the former CNJ main more plausible. Until then it's not all that practical.

    • @matthewhernandez8342
      @matthewhernandez8342 Рік тому +4

      Raritan Valley Line? I used to live in North Plainfield, NJ growing up so I was a 10-15 minute drive away from Plainfield station. I miss riding that train, especially when there's snow on the ground.

    • @Joesolo13
      @Joesolo13 Рік тому +2

      RVL needs more love. If NJT would improve bus frequencies and improve the routes(like extend some New Brunswick routes to Bound Brook) I think it'd get more riders

    • @EpicThe112
      @EpicThe112 9 місяців тому +2

      You are correct on that. Should also fix the issue it has West of Raritan Station the weekday service only to High Bridge. With the Flyover it should allow Weekend service to High Bridge exits 16-18 I-78. At the same Time NJ Transit should order Dual Mode Flirt Class 755s dual door for RVL ACL and the Hoboken division diesel lines.

  • @christopherorourke6543
    @christopherorourke6543 Рік тому +8

    I used to live in Elwood, NJ., I know the PRSL line. In 1967 the Atlantic City line was single tracked with some portions of having it double tracked for up to 15 miles. PATCO had originally planned to extend their line into Atlantic City in gradual phases which they failed to do. Converting the PATCO line to heavy rail, extending all the way to Atlantic City, and Eve to Ocean City, Cape May would be very good. Also even a line all the way to Bayhead from Camden which would connect both South Jersey & North Jersey lines at Bay Head. The Raritan Valley line used to go all the way to Philippsburg and should be extended into Allentown,PA and SEPTA extend service back into Bethlehem & Allentown fron Lansdale where service ends.

  • @EasternSeaboardProductions
    @EasternSeaboardProductions Рік тому +14

    The Reading and Allentown service should be branded as the Keystone Service, and continue to Harrisburg. It is just smarter, also these services could run to Pittsburgh as they are already under diesel.

  • @christopherkraemer4023
    @christopherkraemer4023 Рік тому +6

    not to be that guy, but its pronounced Ab-sea-kin, not a-bes-con. In any case, great video! Love to see my neck of the woods get some coverage online. We have a shit ton of unused rail lines in south jersey that connect population centers and its a shame to see them waste away. The GCL is a promising look at what the future could hold for rail in south jersey. It certainly opens the door to extending the line down to millville, and maybe one day all the way down to cape may. And if that takes off, I feel like other rail lines, such as the merchantville one mentioned in the video, would have the possibility of reactivating as well. Again, great video. Much love from Medford, NJ!

    • @KE-mu5mj
      @KE-mu5mj 2 місяці тому

      In addition to the Absecon mispronunciations, the narrator multiple times mentioned a "Lindenwood" station. It's LindenWOLD.
      The proposals are a bit of a pipe dream. The ACL has no shot of NJT finding hundreds of millions of dollars to completely rebuild rail on what is viewed as a struggling line.

  • @kirkrotger9208
    @kirkrotger9208 Рік тому +23

    Just so you know, "heavy rail" refers to metros like the NYC subway or Tokyo Metro. It serves as a distinction from light rail. The term you're looking for is main line or regional/commuter/intercity rail.

    • @lars7935
      @lars7935 Рік тому +2

      More accurately most countries (not Switzerland though) have separate legislation for light and heavy rail.
      Light rail commonly encompasses trams, trolleys, LRT, automated guideway systems, monorails, some subways etc.
      Heavy rail encompasses mainline (and branchline) rail, high speed rail and some subway systems.
      The terms are in no way limited to metro systems. However they are commonly used to distinguish different system types as light and heavy rail legislation often places widely different limits on train length, loading gauge and maximum speed.

    • @kirkrotger9208
      @kirkrotger9208 Рік тому +4

      @@lars7935 Heavy rail is typically only used to refer to non-metro rail by the Brits. In North America, the term is entirely separate from regional and intercity rail.

    • @lars7935
      @lars7935 Рік тому +1

      @@kirkrotger9208 Well the world is bigger than just two countries so I'm going with the most general definition.

    • @kirkrotger9208
      @kirkrotger9208 Рік тому +2

      @lars7935 That's the definition for the western hemisphere. Considering this is an American channel talking a rail line in the US, that's the appropriate definition to use.

    • @lars7935
      @lars7935 Рік тому +1

      @@kirkrotger9208 Which is valid.
      I had assumed you were talking more generally since you included Tokyo in your original example.

  • @losh330
    @losh330 Рік тому +10

    I'd say the cheapest and best compromise option is to double track the ACL from Atlantic City to Lindenwold and then turn back some trains. The rest of the line into 30th Street would operate at the current schedule or as frequently as the bottleneck permits.

    • @kenw7287
      @kenw7287 Рік тому +2

      The only way to have a second track at Haddonfield would be to tunnel underneath the existing track. You can’t double deck the line as there is the PATCO station right above it.

    • @druliefw
      @druliefw Рік тому +5

      Woodcrest Station would be a better transfer spot as there is a huge parking lot and EZ access to I-295. It would be an excellent spot for folks going to either AC or Philly. The AC line is about the same level as the Patco line there

  • @jscott6058
    @jscott6058 Рік тому +3

    So NJ transit A long time ago, look into the feasibility of running from New York to Philly through Red Bank to Winslow Junction down the old blue Comet line. Obviously as right now nothings happening. But hey you never know. Stranger things have happened

  • @RedArrow73
    @RedArrow73 Рік тому +6

    The Ben Franklin Rail Spaces already have a Sell-By date,
    after which it will be unsafe to even walk on, from an engineering standpoint.
    I respectfully lean toward a tunnel into Jefferson.
    Though I live in TX., I am a Delco native.

  • @iman2341
    @iman2341 4 дні тому +2

    Thinking logically, extending some of the Patco service out to AL makes the most sense. Youd need passing loops at timed intervals along the route as well as station rebuilds but I dont see why you couldnt have it wired with OLE and new trains acquired that are dual voltage to run the route. Hell you could even keep the existing fleet to run the current route and just order the additional 6-8 EMUs needed to operate say a 2tph service out to AL. The current 3rd track along the Patco alignment could even be electrified and used for direction express service in the peaks.

  • @eburro96
    @eburro96 11 місяців тому +3

    Loved your rapid-fire presentation. Great content and interesting proposals for future expansion or re-expansion. Only wish I'd be around when some of them are finally chosen.

  • @seaniebounce
    @seaniebounce Рік тому +1

    Nice one dude. I definitely learned something!!! I've actually ridden the line and its one of my favorites. Great video

  • @edmundanderson657
    @edmundanderson657 Рік тому +8

    I use both PATCO and the AC line, they are both to convenient. I can take either into philly then connect to the airport line, or there is a free shuttle from Egg Harbor to the AC airport. If you want to get to the AC Convention center thats the last stop, the station is at the building. NJT also has a free bus from the station to the casinos. IDK why people don't use it.

    • @qjtvaddict
      @qjtvaddict Рік тому +6

      Cause the AC line is infrequent

    • @moosesandmeese969
      @moosesandmeese969 29 днів тому

      @@qjtvaddict And doesn't even run all days of the week

  • @D.O.T.D.
    @D.O.T.D. Рік тому +3

    Looking forward to this!

  • @qjtvaddict
    @qjtvaddict Рік тому +3

    New rolling stock for PATCO can be bought that is dual mode 3rd rail and catenary so it can be used to run at high speed operation past lindenwold on catenary mode

  • @ft9kop
    @ft9kop Рік тому +6

    NJT can start by connecting the Cherry Hill Station to the Costco and the other stores and the new residential area surrounding the stores and stop at North Philadelphia stations. It'll supply the retail area with workers from Philly and commuters from NJ without cars

  • @Geotpf
    @Geotpf Рік тому +4

    Those short Amtrak routes would almost certainly be partially funded by the state they are in, and therefore the state government would have a lot of say in their details.

  • @austinspringer5153
    @austinspringer5153 Рік тому +1

    I know this is old but that thick line going north from Bound Brook where CSX and Norfolk Southern meet toward Martinsville is only available for the local quarry, operated souley by NS, the additional branching off lines don't exist anymore, even though there were only 3, can't recall how often its used but I thinks its just once a week at like 2am or something. I could hear the train horn with my window open all the way up to halfway between I-78 and Martinsville some nights. Interestingly I've never seen any freight rail trains near me only passenger trains its almost like I don't live near main fright lines or something. Great video though. Traveled many of times along the Morris and Essex Line into the city usually on the midtown direct from my local stop. I've watched your other branch line videos up to this point and the information is fascinating.

  • @pmtractor9413
    @pmtractor9413 Рік тому +26

    As a south jersey resident who happens to work for a railroad in here. I can honestly say none of this will ever happen for 2 reasons. 1: Atlantic city is a shit hole and the only time the line is busy is for the air show. 2: once south of lindinwold there's almost nothing there and only a handful of people use it to commute to Philly.

    • @pmtractor9413
      @pmtractor9413 Рік тому +8

      Lindenwold sorry.

    • @PowerTrain611
      @PowerTrain611 Рік тому

      Couldn't agree more. Atlantic Shitty is what I call it, it's nothing but a dump for garbage people and the homeless.

    • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
      @centredoorplugsthornton4112 Рік тому +12

      I'm one of the Philadelphia commuters on the Atlantic City line. Plenty Philadelphia riders use it to connect with Amtrak and for trips to Atlantic City and back.
      South Jersey has to have rail service.
      Don't tell me to ride PATCO. I did that during the line's 8 month long shutdown and hated it. PATCO acted like it clawed back its monopoly on South Jersey Philadelphia commuter rail. The very week NJ Transit finally reopened the Atlantic City line, PATCO was going to shut down 7 of its 13 stations overnight for security reasons, never mind how it inconvenienced riders. They shelved the idea and admitted no wrongdoing.

    • @kevincinnamontoast3669
      @kevincinnamontoast3669 Рік тому +2

      Plenty? Define plenty.

    • @michaelkkrasting
      @michaelkkrasting Рік тому +2

      As a fellow souther jersian I concur

  • @JacobOhlssonBudinger
    @JacobOhlssonBudinger 2 місяці тому +3

    the much quicker solution would be to buy new bi-mode (possibly battery range extended with fast charge points at atlantic city itself) patco trains and run some of those trains to atlantic city express services.
    that way you can do electrification/double tracking slowly.
    not ideal but it’s more likely than big infrastructure modifications

    • @argh523
      @argh523 2 місяці тому +2

      Double tracking is overrated. You only (maybe) need it if you want to run express trains alonside frequent local trains. Currently, they are running every two hours..
      What you need is for every station to have two platforms (preferably with a pedestrian underpass), so the trains can cross at every station.
      You would have to do this anyway if you're serious about double tracking, but just doing the stations first gives you most of the advantages.
      Also, the line seems to just miss stations. For example, there is a station by the highway exit between Berlin and Atco, but no stations in Berlin or Atco where people actually live.
      I live in a town in Switzerland of 5'000 people. Our train runs every 30 minutes, and they're planning to introduce 15min service in the next decade. It runs on a single track, has higher ridership than the atlantic city train, and the entire population along the line is smaller than the Atlantic City urban area.
      The single track is not the problem. Fix the stations and buy the trains

    • @JacobOhlssonBudinger
      @JacobOhlssonBudinger 2 місяці тому

      @@argh523 you do realise what you’ve just said is an example of “doing double tracking slowly” as service increases right? as i had put in the comment

    • @argh523
      @argh523 24 дні тому

      @@JacobOhlssonBudinger No. I'm not proposing to do double tracking slowly. If you just run a few trains per hour each direction, you don't need double tracking, just points for passing, and it makes sense to do those at stations

  • @7DenshaMaster
    @7DenshaMaster Рік тому +7

    Counter: convert the ACL south of Lindenwold for metro service, reduces overall operating costs, allows for 2 track services and can expand upon express service by having a dual-running system where NJT owns/operates from Lindenwold to AC and PATCO into philly without changing trains

    • @moosesandmeese969
      @moosesandmeese969 29 днів тому

      That's fucking stupid lol. You seem to not know what a metro is clearly

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 3 місяці тому +1

    The solutions to fix the RVL are Hunter Flyover and introducing Stadler FLIRT Dual Modes that way there's High Bridge Weekend service to relive I-78 NJ exits 18-Delaware River PA mp 77.3 to Allentown. Phase II restore RVL to Allentown, PA and amtrak to Harrisburg via the RVL and Reading RR Main Line Allentown Reading Harrisburg. When needed NJ Transit RVL Stadler Flirt dual modes can be transferred to ACL and NJCL if required.

  • @TheTrainspotterFromTauranga
    @TheTrainspotterFromTauranga Рік тому +5

    2:36 ~ That locomotive looks an awful lot like the first NZR Q class; a couple of Rogers 2-4-4 tanks built for New Zealand in 1877.
    I certainly learnt a lot about Atlantic City's railways from this video, having forgot about the Blue Comet. Despite the line being significantly rationalized, I think the current NJT service is better than no train at all (but yeah, the situation at Haddonfield is just stupid).

  • @jwrailve3615
    @jwrailve3615 Рік тому +2

    On the Texas coastline all the spurs and branch lines are literal trenches with the grading inside the trenches because the land is so flat there’s nothing to build a grade on. They also used to use oyster shells for ballast

  • @ericbruun9020
    @ericbruun9020 Рік тому +7

    How did I miss your postings? PATCO should have been extended to the Penn Hospital complex decades ago, which is an alternative perhaps even more compelling.

  • @BrySchec
    @BrySchec Рік тому +3

    The issue with even using this line at all is that it's very difficult/slow to get up and down the island without a car. If I lived out in the suburbs, I would have to drive into town (30-45 mins.+15 minutes with parking/being early), sit on a very slow train (1.5 hours), and then find a jitney/bus/Uber to get me where I need to be (20-45 mins. with waiting). While transit is critical, I couldn't see myself taking it (even if I lived in Center City), especially with luggage/beach stuff.

  • @henryostman5740
    @henryostman5740 Рік тому +1

    In later years looking at expanding the Lindenwold line, other townships have spoken loudly about above ground vs below ground and one went so far as to demand that not only the transit line be buried but the privately owned freight rail line be 'undergrounded' as part of the expansion. Of course the freight line said 'fine, just as long as you pay for it', understand that freight railways cannot handle the same grades as transit and have a larger loading gauge all of which would make the underground part of the project much larger and much more expensive, for this and other reasons the project was never built aside from the Camden/Trenton interurban that used an abandoned rail line. We have to look at these projects from a feasibility prospective, the money well has its limitations. Road bridge tolls pay for both capital costs and operating subsidies of the existing line except for the Trenton line that is run by the state. The Lindenwold is limited by train capacity over the 75 year old Franklin bridge, I believe that these tracks were originally built for trolleys and this line is certainly not a trolley line in terms of train weight, it is a heavyweight rail transit line. Remember too that truck weights on the bridge when it was built were in the range of 25 tons and now they are twice that and remember too that trucks pay tolls, trains don't. Lastly, a major line limitation is the terminal at Philadelphia, there are only two tracks in this former subway station and while some investment has been made to improve train access and eliminate a speed restriction there is still only two tracks. The station does not connect to either the Philadelphia transit nor to the commuter lines in the city, other than that it isn't a bad location but as I remember it is the only stop in Philly.
    Really, discussion of the AC line has to consider AC itself. When the line was built the city was a resort location outside Philly and was a pretty nice one. With the end of the Penn Central it was necessary for somebody to take the line over or see it closed like most of the other former commuter lines into Philly, given the road congestion that was not a good plan and it was added to all of the other commuter lines now run by the NJDOT. This line was a big loser for PC and they never spent much money on it and the state has upgraded it a lot since takeover without going crazy although some of this has involved long term shutdowns that force riders into alternatives, some never come back. A lot of folks thought that casino gambling in AC was going to be the solution to that city's downfall and that it would become the Las Vegas of the east, that didn't happen despite large investments by casino operators in some very nice new hotels and casinos there. What wasn't done was investment in the 'before gambling' assets in the city such as the boardwalk and the attractions there. What happened to the city itself was that a lot of former summer beach properties were converted to year round and rented out in the off months eventually turning to year round leases on properties that are increasingly run down. AC itself doesn't provide a base of commuter ridership, some of the communities around it do, on either side of AC are some really nice communities with none of the decline and decay and crime that infests AC. There is simply not enough parking at the AC terminal however. At one time there was a branch line extending to the southern end of NJ that also generated ridership however this has been discontinued, these communities have continued to grow and prosper. What happened to the casinos at AC is that the high rolling gamblers that make LV so successful didn't show up at AC, most of the casinos are mostly slots and armies of retirees show up daily on chartered busses with a fanny pack of coins to amuse themselves and maybe have a lunch in the casino cafeteria not the expensive restaurants like those in Vegas. A big blow to AC was that neighboring states of PA and NY opened casinos of their own and these have drained a lot of revenue out of the city. NJ itself is at least talking of building a casino just outside of NYC, that would be another nail in the coffin of AC. Neither Amtrak nor NJ transit ever seriously proposed a direct train to AC for gamblers or others. I believe that historically such a train existed.

  • @Stache987
    @Stache987 Рік тому +1

    On Raritan Valley line in the 90s, there was 3 lines revenue into Newark in the AM, 3 outbound PM going past Raritan, it sounds like times have changed.. I used to ride into the city one weeknight a week and had to park at a stadium/station further in from Raritan, since the station lot was contract only, and parking in the residential areas was nowhere to be legally found.. but alas, I'm in Iowa now, and listen for the IARR to go by every night about 8:30 and other times, in fact I was at the bank and heard a strange whistle.. kind of like a steam engine going by.. and sadly the train is freight only and whizzes right on through.

  • @gregrothschild4755
    @gregrothschild4755 Рік тому +1

    I live right by the freight line that the GCL is proposed to run on, though I live slightly south of glassboro. The main bottleneck with construction of the gcl is the NIMBY movement against it primarily in the suburbs south of Camden. I suspect that after 'phase 1' of the GCL the Millville extension will be comparatively easy due to the suburbs being less populated and much of the line going through non populated areas

  • @cliffordporteriii6625
    @cliffordporteriii6625 Рік тому +1

    Excellent.

  • @rilma5216
    @rilma5216 5 місяців тому +1

    The biggest problem is the terrible schedule. Adding more trains would increase casino worker ridership. Trains should run 24 hours. Last train leaving Atlantic City is before 11. Many shows and concerts end right around or after that time so people end up driving.

  • @marcleslac2413
    @marcleslac2413 Рік тому +2

    0:12 *confused montrealer screaming* st constant is where the canadian rr museum is

  • @Rickyrab
    @Rickyrab 9 місяців тому

    Interesting proposal

  • @brendang673
    @brendang673 Рік тому +5

    Unlike north Jersey, south Jersey has a tiny metro area. Thus the low numbers on the AC Line mean that NJT will probably do nothing to it. I think what would help is making the line Philly oriented, by having more service to Philly in the morning and AC in the evening. Why this line has no rush hour trains, unlike every other NJT line is beyond me. Otherwise, maybe electrifying the line in the long term would help to make more uniform to other NJT lines.

    • @allaboardarizonaaaaz842
      @allaboardarizonaaaaz842 Рік тому +5

      Scheduling on the line is limited by the number and location of sidings.

    • @xvrvlzqz
      @xvrvlzqz Рік тому +1

      Another hanging issue about the AC line is Amtrak.

  • @njunderground82
    @njunderground82 Рік тому +1

    I grew up in South Jersey, and used PATCO and the ACL frequently. Its a real shame how short changed the region was and is and that funds were never allocated to fix the severe congestion problems in the region. There is next to no rail access to the major towns and cities with the rest of the state, which makes the congestion so much worse. It was shortsighted to abandon and convert and outright eliminate ROWs through out the region. I know if I had easier access to public transit rather than dealing with the overcrowding and congestion on the roads, I might still be living there today.

  • @benzzc3626
    @benzzc3626 2 місяці тому +1

    A new station should be constructed near the old Frankford Jct station in Philly, but closer to the Mkt-Fkd El. That way, Trenton line and El riders could catch the Atlantic City train there instead of riding all the way to 30th St. to transfer, saving at least a half-hour.

  • @history_leisure
    @history_leisure Рік тому +1

    I have thought about converting Patco back to heavy rail. At that, just restore heavy rail to Glassboro-Millville service with heavy rail over LRT, and maybe even take it to the Cape May-Lewes ferry (they could do that with LRT if they wanted). They could always convert the line from Pennsauken to Haddonfield into a River Line Branch/dinky if people still want service. If there are already deals with Conrail/CSX on the Glassboro-Camden line, maybe it wouldn't be much more to ask. I also had a thought if we bring service from the Bridge Line, we might want to put back Spring Garden for Chestnut Hill, Cynwyd, and maybe Reading and Leigh Amtrak service if desired (although I do not think that area is as desirable as Madrid having Sol and Recoletos, even if Spring Garden and Jefferson would be about Equidistant [3000ft], depending on where station entrances are placed). There a chemical factory and some theaters in Callow Hill where said station would be when Sol is an economic hub and one of the transfer hubs of the metro where Recoletos has an out of station transfer with Line 4 at Colon or Serano as well as a couple of museums, parks, and I think the Spanish Supreme Court. I spent almost half the year in Spain so I know quite a bit-but I don't know if I can translate the Spanish Wikipedia pages into English unless I was paid to do it

  • @michaelkkrasting
    @michaelkkrasting Рік тому +1

    Im just here cuz it’s nice my neck of the woods is getting some attention😊

  • @MontclairBoontonLineRailfan
    @MontclairBoontonLineRailfan Рік тому +1

    Nice video brother. You should’ve included the Gladstone branch tho

  • @jenniferboyle9855
    @jenniferboyle9855 2 місяці тому +1

    also in mentioning the ac line is many options njt has been thinking of and a few are redevolpment of as many south jersey rail lines as posible. also making bayhead a pass through like long branch to connect to the ac line also there is a couple of lines you did not mention at all and that is on the coast line there is a couple of branchoffs one at perth amboy or south amboy going through to jameburg then head south through freehold to lakewood that there are redeloping as i type this Also another from monmouth junction to jamesburg to freehold thine lines still exsist just have to be converted to either commuter use or light rail lines but most of all once you leave lakewood the camden route went throught the pinelands to trenton to camden --i know that because my mom took that exact line from freehold to trenton cathloic high school all it would take is a line inspection crew in a rali pickup to inspect the lines for flaws

  • @Maunico0809
    @Maunico0809 Рік тому +3

    ACL more like, more like, more like, I can’t come up with a light hearted pun for this.

  • @allaboardarizonaaaaz842
    @allaboardarizonaaaaz842 Рік тому +5

    The best and simplest solution would be for DRPA to take over the line and convert the whole operation to metro. This option was turned down in 1979 when Congressman Jimmy Florio proposed it to the agency. The problem was twofold: the cost of money, and the fact that the agency was over-leveraged due to the costs of the Betsy Ross and Commodore Barry bridges.
    On the west end of the line, it needs to be connected via subway to Thirtieth Street Station. The Sixteenth-Locust terminus is in the middle of nowhere, and the Woodland Avenue subway, into which it was to feed, was never constructed.
    On the east end, all grade crossings on the line need to be eliminated. Station stops with island platforms need to be at Berlin Township (West Berlin), Berlin Borough (Berlin), Atco, Hammonton, Hammonton Park-and-Ride, Egg Harbor City, Absecon, Atlantic City Convention Center and Boardwalk. A short elevated structure from Convention Center to Boardwalk, even if single-tracked, would debark passengers where the action is, not a long distance from it in a less-than-safe city.
    New rolling stock capable of 110 mph operation would be needed, and some local stops on the Lindenwold segment would be skipped for Atlantic City trains. The current rolling stock originally operated at 75 mph until too many motors burned out. The speed was lowered to 65, and it may even be down to 60 by now. We need rolling stock that can get around that problem and provide competitive service when rated against the Atlantic City Expressway.

  • @jfmezei
    @jfmezei Рік тому +2

    It would seem to me that extending Patco to Atlantic City would make the most sense. But there are few problems:
    1- No connection to 30th street station for Amtrak.
    2- Patco's trains are the originals that were recently rebuilt. The motors wsere retained/refurbished because they are so powerful. Patco trains pack quite a punch when it comes to acceleration. The question is whether they have enough spare trains to extend say 2 trains to Atlantic City for hourly service (wth rest of trains still terminating at Lindenwold). Or if they would need to purchase new trainsets. (and then there is the issue of fares since going beyond Lindenwold would likely cost more so how do you collect those extra fares?)
    3- 3rd rail and level crossings don't mix very well (but do exist) and there are lots of level crossings. I think the worse one is at Egg Harbor City (crossing the main street/highway 50 where width of road might require train to be long enough to still get power from back until front has crossed road and recontacted 3rd rail.
    Or just keep route as is and just iprove track conditions for highed speed and add more sidings to allow greater frequency. This has the advantage of being incremental in nature instead of rebuilding new serice on the right of way.

  • @stevee4636
    @stevee4636 Рік тому +3

    Not doing any of that, as very few ride to / from A/C , it will remain as is, until it stops entirely.

  • @devanzane
    @devanzane 11 місяців тому +1

    bro i would LOVEEEE the glassboro line

  • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
    @centredoorplugsthornton4112 Рік тому +9

    Haddonfield was trenched because the elitists there didn't want an elevated line going through their town. They also were one of the bitterest NIMBY opponents to the Atlantic City line in the 1980s.
    It's Ab-SE-con, not AB-se-con.

    • @allaboardarizonaaaaz842
      @allaboardarizonaaaaz842 Рік тому +9

      I lived in Haddon Township from 1955 to 1971, and I remember all too well the mayor of Haddonfield's statement that the PATCO line would fail in three months. He was looking forward to using the station's parking lot for Haddonfield's businesses. He never thought the line would succeed the way it did. I rode the line on opening day, January 4, 1969. I remember it was raining heavily gthat day.

    • @centredoorplugsthornton4112
      @centredoorplugsthornton4112 Рік тому +4

      @@allaboardarizonaaaaz842 yep heard Haddonfield officials claim it would fail too. Ha ha.

    • @gregorypollard5908
      @gregorypollard5908 Рік тому +2

      And Linden-WOLD not Linden-WOOD

  • @AshleyRyan15
    @AshleyRyan15 Рік тому +3

    Don't convert PATCO, convert to PATCO! Yeah, it's kind of expensive, but it's probably cheaper to electrify to AC than to figure out how the hell to convert all the infrastructure in the city to support heavy rail. Doesn't need the same frequency as PATCO but those trains are just as comfortable as commuter rail

    • @AshleyRyan15
      @AshleyRyan15 Рік тому +1

      I need to learn to finish the damn video before commenting

  • @mjbaz1
    @mjbaz1 Рік тому +3

    You seem to assume that the powers that be care about rail service in Southern New Jersey. Or that Camden is desirable to travel and visit. Or that anyone would spend the money to double track an extremely iffy rail line. I was told there were studies done that recommended more frequent service on both the River Line and Atlantic City Rail Line, and nothing has happened.

  • @gunrunner7224
    @gunrunner7224 Рік тому +1

    They could try to get the old southern secondary back up and then run it down and then connect it to the line and that would increase ridership.

  • @PascackValleyandMainline
    @PascackValleyandMainline Рік тому +2

    Can’t find we’re the pascack valley line fixing is? But good video!

  • @xOogieBoogie3x
    @xOogieBoogie3x Рік тому +5

    You murdered some of these town names.

  • @FSantoro91
    @FSantoro91 Рік тому +1

    For that amount of money, I'd rather electrify the existing line, keeping it single-track but with more (longer) sidings so that trains can theoretically meet "on the run", and I'd build a branch between the Delair Bridge and Frankford Jct to connect to the NEC without reversing at 30th Street. That way you could have two bi-hourly services from Atlantic City: one to Philly, and one to Trenton and points north on the NEC, bridging the gap with the remaining NJT system. Together with electrification, there could be some work on the ROW to upgrade the line to Class 5 standards, allowing operations at up to 90 mph. (This alone could already drastically reduce journey times due to better acceleration and higher speeds.)
    But that's my ignorant opinion from the other side of the Pond - though I operated on commuter, regional and long-distance trains in Italy for 10 yrs, now operating freight.
    Good video, anyway.

    • @johnchambers8528
      @johnchambers8528 Рік тому +1

      Just a short note about speed on the Atlantic City line. This line does not have close spaced stations so these trains can get up to speed rather fast with their existing diesel powered engines. They also run with rather short trains usually 3 or 4 cars so it doesn’t take much to get up to the existing speed limit on the line. Also once on the electrified Northeast Amtrak line they accelerate up to full track speed so electrification at todays level of service does not make sense. Even in the old PRSL days the RDC’s would fly between Lindenwald and Atlantic City. I rode up in the cab a few times and saw the speedometer hit 90 with ease and that was on the old track. In fact the trains almost always arrived in Atlantic City several minutes early and it was a source of pride for the engineers at that time on how fast they could get the run done. Of corse in those days there was no scheduled conflicting passenger trains running the other way and I never saw a freight train on the line when the commuter trains were scheduled.

  • @adamaviation6236
    @adamaviation6236 Рік тому +2

    What about creating an upper level track at Haddonfield just to the side

  • @josephdurning656
    @josephdurning656 Рік тому +2

    extend Patco to Atlantic City cheapest way to go. use third rail as they do up in New York where their is a intersection just stop the third rail before inter section. 4 Patco cars will make it throught the break

  • @UchennaKema
    @UchennaKema 10 місяців тому +1

    Ironically I was the opposite, convert the Atlantic city to heavy Subway (PATH) with diesel bits for long distance

  • @J-Bahn
    @J-Bahn 2 місяці тому +1

    There is one question that needs to be answered: could FRA crashworthiness approved trains ever be made to fit dimension and weight wise onto the subway tunnels? If yes, then this project could actually be completed relatively expensively; just add a third rail and add passing sidings to allow for more trains
    If not you would need to grade separate everything between Lindenwald and Atalntic City which would hike the price up a lot and may turn locals against the project.
    That said, if you could *somehow* connect this to the City Center Septa tunnel an unsaid benefit would be that you would solve the problem of branch imbalance you would equalize the number of branches on the Reading side compared to the Pennsy side.

  • @andrewreynolds4949
    @andrewreynolds4949 Рік тому +4

    I am not familiar with the line but I imagine the cheapest and most reasonable way to improve service would be to introduce an hourly service instead of the twice hourly. With the length the single tracking appears to be that would probably be achievable with a limited addition of sidings rather than full double tracking. The sidings do not necessarily need to be in the stations either, but can be built on sections wherever there’s room. The other recommendation I would have is to replace the GP40PH-2 locomotives with PL42AC or ALP-45DP units, especially since the line intersects with the very capacity-congested NEC.

    • @SwirlyTrainz
      @SwirlyTrainz Рік тому +2

      ALP45s inherit alot of issues on the Atlantic City Line. They overheat if they idle underground for too long so they have to be brought outside the station at 30th Street. Also, since the service using the NEC into Philly, the train has to make a full stop once on and switch over from deisel power to electric power. Therefore adding travel time to the route which already gets sided for Amtrak going into philly

    • @andrewreynolds4949
      @andrewreynolds4949 Рік тому +1

      @@SwirlyTrainz I suppose that's probably true; it looks like they do still have a number of PL42AC units that are scheduled to be replaced that could be displaced instead

    • @redarrow5591
      @redarrow5591 Рік тому +1

      @@andrewreynolds4949 The PL42ACs have serious reliability issues; They HAVE to be ran in solid sets (either C-Vs or Multilevels) or the locomotive computer melts down; Like the ALP45's, the heat from the exhaust is so great, that it CAN melt and snap catenary; they don't like to run at high speed for a extended period. The list goes on and on!!!!!
      Right now there is MINIMAL line protection as there is several GP40PH-CAT2's out of service for overhaul.

    • @evanstauffer4470
      @evanstauffer4470 Місяць тому

      I generally agree with your suggestions, except the choice of locomotives. The GP-40 is one of the most reliable locomotives ever built, whereas most if not all of the newer foreign designs are trouble-prone. It is very unfortunate that the Federal government didn't snap up all the F-40s that Amtrak was getting rid of, and store them for future rebuilding using modern American-built prime movers and electrical equipment based on highly reliable American-built freight locomotives. A locomotive does not need to look like it was styled by Raymond Lowey in order to pull commuter trains.

    • @andrewreynolds4949
      @andrewreynolds4949 Місяць тому

      @@evanstauffer4470 The old EMD units are fantastic and I love them, but there are still limits on how long they can be kept in service. Eventually it reaches a point where the only reasonable way to keep them reliably running is to replace virtually everything, which does have cost advantages (see previous rebuild programs on similar networks), but that still has limitations and still gives a locomotive not optimized for commuter service. I suggested the PL42AC or ALP45DP units because they are models NJT already has, and would not need to set up new logistics for them. I would not favor replacing them with Siemens Chargers for that reason. Meanwhile the GP-40s could be transferred to non-revenue service or sold off very easily, given there is still a somewhat significant demand for older EMD units.
      All this does presume significant enhancements are being made to the line's service; What I would actually do if I was in charge of this as part of NJT is probably what they seem to be doing for this line, which is very little (from the lack of news I have seen). I think the GP-40s will stay for now.

  • @MoskitoGirl
    @MoskitoGirl Місяць тому +1

    Watching for Morris fears

  • @notarotomwithhair5637
    @notarotomwithhair5637 Рік тому +2

    Do the opposite of frontrunner and doubletrack the line everywhere but stations that cant get

  • @markdeloatch9796
    @markdeloatch9796 9 днів тому +1

    How about extending PATCO to Atlantic City, put third rail down, expand the platforms, add a other track, and you have it, a rail line from Philadelphia to Atlantic City.

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  9 днів тому

      I also mention that as one of the possibilities for the route later in the video.

  • @jfmezei
    @jfmezei Рік тому +1

    After reading comments, I now feel guilty of interpreting Absecon sound as it is spelled. And always though of Lindenwold as it is spelled, not ending as wald. (and for some reason, the name reminded me of the original Westworld movie as some sort of futuristic place where that "plane" is aunched to bring to the amusement park).
    I agree with another poster about the future of Atlantic City. The casinos haven't done that well. And one large complex that was built at northern end of downtown was sort of half completed after many bankruptcies. The city itself needs to do the work to attract travellers to whatever purpose it decides (casinos, beach or whatever). Unless that is done, the city can't expect transit to magically appear. City needs a plan to attract enough people to warrant improving ACL.
    On other hand, the smaller communities along the way might become extended suburbs of Camden/Philly and those towns would appreciate seeing home values increase if transit made it possible to have daily commute sto work.

  • @xvrvlzqz
    @xvrvlzqz Рік тому +4

    The Raritan Valley Line is NOT a branch line. That distinction belongs to the Princeton or Gladstone branches. Also your proposal for the Raritan Valley Line while is interesting, it ain't gonna happen. Most stations east of Raritan won't be moving due to some of the towns not wanting to deal with all that (NIMBY crowds) clusterfuck. Actually it works out fine the way it is with maybe a few more trains running from High Bridge on weekdays

    • @Joesolo13
      @Joesolo13 Рік тому +1

      I think Raritan Valley line could benefit a lot from better links south of Newark. There's some fantastical ideas out there, but I think just bus service from NB station to either bound brook, or Somerville with at least 30min frequency would do a lot of good.
      Giving it to the 815 and it could link 3 different lines faster than doing horseshoe trip on the rails

  • @Robbi496
    @Robbi496 Рік тому +3

    If you know your history, the Newark Bay Bridge was removed because it was a navigation and rail hazard

  • @joshuacarrasco1536
    @joshuacarrasco1536 Місяць тому +1

    I always wish until this day if they would not scrap the Atlantic City Express from Penn Station Newark Penn Station and to Atlantic City that would have been a big difference

  • @hiltondrivef8458
    @hiltondrivef8458 Рік тому +1

    There's a lot they can do expand the north jersey coast train from bay head jct take that trough where abandoned it through seaside heights seaside park and Barnet and beachheaven and contact that thru the lakewood and then Atlantic city lines parts of those lines thru lakewood and Lakehurst is out of service try to connect

  • @johntherailfan3754
    @johntherailfan3754 Рік тому +8

    If Patco is converted to heavy rail, it could be operated with ex-LIRR cars by either New Jersey Transit or Patco.

  • @Robbi496
    @Robbi496 Рік тому +2

    What about putting back trains to Ocean City and Cape May??

  • @egbutler114
    @egbutler114 Рік тому +1

    A glance at the rail service in the Philly area shows a lack of service on the NJ side. I think a rail tunnel that connects Philly to NJ would be the best plan. Electrify the tunnel and the line from Camden, Woodbury, down to Vineland. Scrap that light rail mess.

  • @randallmauger5659
    @randallmauger5659 21 день тому +1

    End of PATCO line is Lindenwold not Lindenwood. Other than that, great video!

  • @lamegaming9835
    @lamegaming9835 6 місяців тому +1

    honestly just double tracking a couple more sections here and there and improving track quality would go a long way. i think we get too fixated on grand plans and ignore the effects of small improvements here and there

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 Рік тому +1

    the scanton service should run though nyc penn station to springfield

  • @heha9752
    @heha9752 Рік тому +1

    Can we please just have NJT’s NE Corridor connect to 30th Street? Then we can have a cohesive system! Amtrak and Septa would, without a doubt, get pissed off though…

  • @EmeraldCrimsonShadowPeach2K5
    @EmeraldCrimsonShadowPeach2K5 Рік тому +1

    What if they restored the West Trenton Line not only for regular Commuter Rail service, but also for a revival of the Atlantic City Express Service? I think that would be great because it could allow for direct service between New York and Atlantic City without having to reverse in Philadelphia, as the line already exists from West Trenton to Philadelphia. I think that the stations the new ACES should serve are Penn Station (New York), Newark Penn Station, West Trenton, 30th Street Station (Philadelphia), and Atlantic City.
    I also think that a second track would be a great idea, because it would allow for Amtrak trains to run there with little to no congestion. You're right, though. If they were going to add the second track, they would probably have to rebuild the Haddonfield Station, and that would most likely cost at least a few million dollars.

    • @kenw7287
      @kenw7287 Рік тому +2

      The line from West Trenton to Philadelphia is former Reading Railroad trackage. The only place where that trackage links up with the old Pennsylvania Railroad trackage is the Center City Connection.
      A revival of the ACES service in the proposed manner would therefore require a roundabout trip through Center City. Its much worse than the current service.
      The only way to have true express service is to rebuild the old CNJ Blue Comet line. Unfortunately that line now goes through the Lakehurst Naval Station, so it is a complete non-starter.

  • @PM08203
    @PM08203 Рік тому +1

    PATCO should take over the AC Line and run all the way to the convention center. NJT treats the AC Line as a stepchild .

  • @obifox6356
    @obifox6356 Місяць тому +1

    How about extending PATCO to AC, with battery car on thru trains?

  • @WesternOhioInterurbanHistory
    @WesternOhioInterurbanHistory Рік тому +7

    when are we getting fixing your branch line of the ffarquahar branch line

  • @n.e.barton1299
    @n.e.barton1299 Рік тому +1

    Good presentation. Absecon is pronounced Ahb- SEE-con.

  • @jenniferboyle9855
    @jenniferboyle9855 2 місяці тому +1

    the raritan line the most unutilized rail line out there as it terminates in high bridge i lived in glen gardener for 5 yrs and use the high bridge station daily --but if you extendit to the delware gap bridge it passes right through philpsburgs easton and bethleham in phil. it would benifit alot of rail passengers living in the highlands of nothwest jersey and that region to allentown to the westbut the track layout and right of ways are still there there is alot of people who travel from philpsburg to highland that would benifit from the redevolpment of that line also about every 3 to 5 yrs passengers who travel that distance pation njt to redevlop the line again i know i let a few of them

  • @alexisdespland4939
    @alexisdespland4939 Рік тому +2

    also in the medium o long term it should be extended south t through the greater Atlantic city area to ocean cit. and maybe even the resort community of wildwood.
    u

  • @amjkodaz
    @amjkodaz Рік тому +1

    The two-hour frequencies are there for a good reason, like many others in here said, AC is a total shithole that not many people want to go to. So why would added capacity by adding another track be worth the money?

  • @brendanu1680
    @brendanu1680 Рік тому +3

    What About The Main And Bergen County Lines? No Electrification And No Penn Station Service Makes Them Important To Fix. What's Your Diagnosis For Them?

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  Рік тому +1

      I think I surveyed them before. For those lines, I would say restore the 4th track where it used to be.

  • @kenw7287
    @kenw7287 Рік тому +3

    Your plan to double track the ACL ignores the lack of demand east of Lindenwold. The rest of the line is in sparsely populated deep South Jersey. The line already takes such a redundant routing through North Philly that most riders just get off at Lindenwold to transfer to PATCO as the trip is faster even with the connection.
    You are better off converting the entire ACL up to Cherry Hill to BRT. Have a grade separated BRT busway parallel the AC Expressway with sliding converted to
    passing shoulder lines of some kind. You would then reorient the service as an express to Philly which is where the demand is. The BRT line would branch off at Route 70 in Cherry Hill where is a few relatively empty parking lots and strip malls to build an interchange. You would then have the buses take Route 70 to the Ben Franklin bridge and to Center City Philly. This busway would be modeled after the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway in England.

  • @procrastinatingpuma
    @procrastinatingpuma Рік тому +1

    Can you do a video on NCTD’s SPRINTER

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  Рік тому

      I usually cover railroads with four or more branch lines, and sadly Coaster/NICTD does not meet this qualification.

  • @fehrhardt9368
    @fehrhardt9368 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the rich & checkered history.
    Just a little nit, but as someone who grew up in Absecon, please allow me to correct the pronunciation: ab-SEE-cunn

  • @felicetanka
    @felicetanka Рік тому +1

    Single track. What do you expect where even helping the infirm is a business.

  • @qjtvaddict
    @qjtvaddict Рік тому +1

    You make good points state agencies should be running these services NOT Amtrak. Amtrak should build dedicated HSR and only run HSR lines with the rest being state run services

    • @Geotpf
      @Geotpf Рік тому +1

      There is such a thing as state supported Amtrak routes. These are funded partially by the state and frequently run by a joint powers authority. See the three intra-state Amtrak lines within California (Capitol Corridor, San Joaquins, and Pacific Surfliner) for examples.

  • @GeospaciallyGone
    @GeospaciallyGone 5 місяців тому +1

    Maybe the ACL could just share the trackage with PATCO?

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  5 місяців тому

      NJT might have some clearance issues with the 3rd rail and platforms that prevent them from using PATCO tracks, as well as the fare system at PATCO stations if NJT were to stop at PATCO stations.

  • @montyb10009
    @montyb10009 Рік тому +3

    This was a very informative, but I did get a kick out of you annihilating the name Absecon.

    • @Pensyfan19
      @Pensyfan19  Рік тому +3

      Thanks, my Long Island accent sometimes makes me mispronounce some words, or a simple slip of the tongue. Apologies for any pronunciation errors on the channel.

    • @montyb10009
      @montyb10009 Рік тому +3

      @@Pensyfan19 No apologies necessary at all. I'm a total New Yorker from the Lower East Side and my accent lets every know it. 😁 I just thought it was funny because my cousin lives in Egg Harbor City and used to correct my pronunciation of Absecon and others.

    • @edmundanderson657
      @edmundanderson657 Рік тому +2

      Lindenwold and another too. I got a good laugh out of it.

  • @user-me7up3dq2x
    @user-me7up3dq2x 9 місяців тому +1

    Well...for the (PATCO) expand more

  • @joshuafajardo5697
    @joshuafajardo5697 Рік тому +1

    It should be Inbound cab into Philly & Outbound 🚂 from Philly

  • @bettyacheampong5412
    @bettyacheampong5412 10 місяців тому +2

    My opinion to fix the branch line BRING BACK THE ATLANTIC CITY EXPRESS expansion service for New Jersey Transit bring back the p42dc and alp44 and bring back the aces coaches that will be cool

  • @gamerfan8445
    @gamerfan8445 Рік тому +1

    You made a mistake. The Franklin bridge can’t support the weight for heavy rail.

  • @joezegers
    @joezegers Рік тому +1

    Gladstone Branch: *INSERT SECOND TRACK (and more service to New York) HERE*

  • @vojtasTS29
    @vojtasTS29 Рік тому +1

    How is the River Line "light rail"? It uses completely normal european heavy rail rolling stock and is shared with freight traffic.

    • @redarrow5591
      @redarrow5591 Рік тому

      Its how they got around a bunch of safety regulations...... The RiverLive (NJT Route 343) falls under the purview of the FTA despite the operators having to carry NORAC rule books; Full stop signal enforcement along with temporal separation from CSAO is also there.
      CSAO is only allowed to operate along the line between 22.00 and 05.00 Sunday to Friday from Pennsauken to Bordentown; any customer work has to be done then. The exceptions is around CP ROSS and the Burlington Running Track.

  • @syeet1234
    @syeet1234 Рік тому +1

    the ending tho