Perspectives on Colorado's proposed bill to ban 'assault weapons'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 121

  • @ramonrodriguez7097
    @ramonrodriguez7097 6 місяців тому +30

    This bill is an outright infringement of our 2nd amendment rights. None of these laws are going to stop unlawful people. And I support everyone who's going to file law suits on these

    • @chriscruzA35O-9OO
      @chriscruzA35O-9OO 6 місяців тому +2

      What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED they don’t understand

  • @seth3137
    @seth3137 7 місяців тому +24

    This bill is SO STUPID

  • @alexferguson9836
    @alexferguson9836 7 місяців тому +34

    The assault weapons ban of the 90s didn't stop the massacre at my high school...

    • @gottroubletactical
      @gottroubletactical 6 місяців тому +6

      Nor the one at sandy hook in CT where I was from. CT had a carbon copy of the awb in place when it happened.

    • @ilovetech8341
      @ilovetech8341 6 місяців тому +2

      armed teachers is working in half the states

  • @heinzpilot
    @heinzpilot 6 місяців тому +19

    The second amendment shall not be infringed! WTF has happened to my home state of Colorado!

    • @pbkid01
      @pbkid01 6 місяців тому +3

      California is what happened to Colorado.

  • @Derideo
    @Derideo 7 місяців тому +51

    I was once assaulted by a weapon, a liquor bottle. Ban all liquor bottles!!!

  • @coopula3387
    @coopula3387 7 місяців тому +28

    If this passes I am moving my business out of Colorado it will be a crime hell hole worse than it is now.

    • @majestytd
      @majestytd 6 місяців тому

      If this bill pass, please come back to this comment and let us know you're moving... thanks...

    • @coopula3387
      @coopula3387 6 місяців тому

      @@majestytd Might want to remove your tactical training video with the evil assault rifle as the libs call them.

  • @ihutaylor9438
    @ihutaylor9438 7 місяців тому +27

    I got hit by a car once they are meant to kill ban cars.

  • @robertpena9293
    @robertpena9293 7 місяців тому +47

    Vote the Democrats out

  • @ApocoRaptor
    @ApocoRaptor 7 місяців тому +22

    Support the 2nd Ammendment. I am not American but I do believe in gun rights for all citizens.

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 6 місяців тому

      I believe that Terrorists should have the rights to purchase guns too!

    • @Dirk-my2zf
      @Dirk-my2zf 6 місяців тому

      @@nntflow7058terrorist will get them (RE: Guns) no matter what you fucking believe.

  • @90svision99
    @90svision99 7 місяців тому +19

    I’m a Colorado native born & raised.!. If this Bill passes I will be moving from my home State! You pass this bill ain’t goNn to change Sh!t… Crime will just get worse & I won’t stick around because I have a right to defend my family! Texas here we come!

    • @KN-ko8ez
      @KN-ko8ez 7 місяців тому

      Be careful…Texas is gaining a lot of blue from people moving from California.

    • @90svision99
      @90svision99 7 місяців тому

      I believe it there being planted in Red states to dismantle our Freedom States !

    • @s.mic.3329
      @s.mic.3329 6 місяців тому +3

      Stand and fight back instead of running. There will come a day where there won't be anywhere to run

    • @chriscruzA35O-9OO
      @chriscruzA35O-9OO 6 місяців тому

      Texas💪💪💪I love my texas

    • @Dirk-my2zf
      @Dirk-my2zf 6 місяців тому

      Texas will welcome you with open arms, even the democRATS in Texas own AR15’s. We are becoming the 2A sanctuary state in TX.

  • @ninjabiatch101
    @ninjabiatch101 6 місяців тому +3

    The guns are already out there, i don't see banning new sales making any difference. Aside from punishing people who like guns. It's not like they're going to make it illegal to own them.

  • @somedude6584
    @somedude6584 7 місяців тому +13

    Just disarm innocent working folk, I'm sure this will make the bad people stop assaulting people with illegally obtained firearms.

  • @robertfrost8531
    @robertfrost8531 7 місяців тому +8

    18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
    If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
    If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-
    They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

    • @rubreh6638
      @rubreh6638 5 місяців тому

      Awesome dude 👍

  • @tenzinchoerab3061
    @tenzinchoerab3061 6 місяців тому +3

    do they not understand "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" ??

  • @almanneck8159
    @almanneck8159 7 місяців тому +16

    How many hunters does she know?

    • @austism1
      @austism1 7 місяців тому +1

      NONE OF THE ONES SHE KNOWS USES AN AR 15...... ! NOT ONE, NONE OF THEM.... LOL 🤣

  • @robmiskowitch6344
    @robmiskowitch6344 6 місяців тому +1

    The authors of the bill can't define the terms they use in this bill. What is "Altered facsimile"? The bill lists a number of guns and states "Including, but not limited to" anything with the capability of a gun. This bill includes rim fire .22 caliber guns. The definitions in this bill can include any magazine fed and some non-magazine fed guns. If the authors can't or choose not to define the ambigious terms in this bill it will be our courts that convict some that couldn't determine what the law intents. Agree or disagree with the intent of this bill it should at least be clear, this bill is not clear.

  • @parrotheadrick
    @parrotheadrick 5 місяців тому

    I've been on this earth 69 years. I spent 8 years in the military and in all my years I have never ever yet to see an assault rifle.

  • @FarmerRiddick
    @FarmerRiddick 7 місяців тому +10

    As usual, a carte blanch weapon ban that is ultimately meaningless. These types of weapons are not just "for hunting". Another intent of the 2nd is to deal with government tyranny. What kinds of weapons does the government foot soldiers have at it's disposal? They also have armored vehicles.
    The average person would find near impossible to have such things or, afford to train with it.
    The 2nd cover 'ARMS' no matter if it's a spear, sword, bow, Brown Bess or an AR.
    There is a reason the 2nd is followed by the 1st. Remember, tyranny is part of the reason the 2nd exists.
    The money, time and energy is SO misplaced on going after Laddi, Dotti, Capt'n Crunch and whole dam Bunch, instead using that money, time and energy dealing with the criminal elements and more importantly, mitigating or preventing the criminal elements to begin with, with the same fervor repeatedly presented by going after law abiding citizens.
    Grow the EFF up, Fools!

  • @simonerubino52
    @simonerubino52 5 місяців тому

    Imagine how many less people would have died if more people were armed.

  • @keithlewis7520
    @keithlewis7520 6 місяців тому

    If you want to keep Coloradans safe, then stop passing laws that support the criminals and enforce the laws that are already in place…

  • @austism1
    @austism1 7 місяців тому +7

    I didnt know bruce jenner lived in Colorado

    • @slippinjimmothy
      @slippinjimmothy 6 місяців тому

      Who gives a shit? She has more balls than you do, dolt.

  • @brianmonroe5505
    @brianmonroe5505 6 місяців тому +2

    This bill is not just on so called assault weapons. It's against 80% of guns being used by law abiding citizens.

    • @sandyh5873
      @sandyh5873 6 місяців тому +1

      That is the catch, the chatter is about AR rifles and yet slipped in the bill includes all magazine fed handguns.

  • @OpenSource478
    @OpenSource478 6 місяців тому

    They know if it works. They wouldnt need armed security.

  • @jacobstillson3498
    @jacobstillson3498 6 місяців тому

    This needs to lead to the last time Democrats take office the Supreme Court already ruled in the favor of Bruin. By the Bruins standard, there is no outline before 1776 and banning assault weapons. Secondly classify what an assault weapon is you cannot AR 15s have never been used on any battlefield. We the people should be able to own anything that the US military owns anyways or do you want to keep infringing on second amendment rights. If you want to upon second amendment rights, this will be your last terminal office and we the people will make sure that you will never see a high office again stand with us as we the people not we the government.

  • @TheMan-je5xq
    @TheMan-je5xq 2 місяці тому

    Shall not be infringed

  • @psp4u2t20
    @psp4u2t20 5 місяців тому

    No such thing as a assault rifle, Assault is a action not weapon

  • @abirch77
    @abirch77 7 місяців тому +6

    Thank you for showing at least one representative of the tranagender community - one of the most marginalized communities & which suffers disporportionality high hate crimes.

  • @Dirk-my2zf
    @Dirk-my2zf 6 місяців тому

    All emotion by the gun grabbers.

  • @TheBuelliganRides
    @TheBuelliganRides 6 місяців тому +1

    It's not about the gun. Semi-automatic rifles (Winchester model 1907 in .30 caliber) have been in the public domain for almost 120 years. Since back when our Soldiers were still being issued bolt action Springfields 1903s in WW1 and up almost until WW2. You could buy a semi-automatic rifle from Sears & Roebuck, and it would come to you in a box in the US Mail. It has the same magazine capacity as an ar-15, the same rate of fire as an ar-15, only the bullet is bigger and does much more damage.
    Where was this epidemic then? Why were there no mass shootings then?
    If it were the gun, it would have been the gun for a hundred years. This epidemic is only 40 years old.
    We don't have a gun problem, we have a brat problem. For the most part, these School shooters are from the first generation that we couldn't discipline as children. Clearly "time out" just didn't work.
    But as long as we continue blaming it on the gun (much like sending thoughts and prayers to act like we care), we'll NEVER find a solution.

  • @oldguyplaysbass6503
    @oldguyplaysbass6503 7 місяців тому +10

    Commirado gonna commie ...

  • @rubreh6638
    @rubreh6638 5 місяців тому

    Come take them. Tired of the argument. Im not giving anything up. Come try.

  • @psp4u2t20
    @psp4u2t20 5 місяців тому

    No such thing, assault is a action not weapon

  • @badgumby9544
    @badgumby9544 5 місяців тому

    Too late Colorado. You are over run with extreme lefty Democrats. You dodged the bullet on this one again, for now. It will be back next year, guaranteed.

  • @BennyDIVER
    @BennyDIVER 7 місяців тому +7

    Even the trans person knows better!

  • @Almost_Average_
    @Almost_Average_ 7 місяців тому +11

    Trump 2024

    • @2009kdizzle
      @2009kdizzle 7 місяців тому +1

      Oh the guy who banned bump stocks.. ok

    • @evandyer5265
      @evandyer5265 6 місяців тому +2

      ​@@2009kdizzlebetter than the guy trying to completely disarm us.

    • @rubreh6638
      @rubreh6638 5 місяців тому

      ​​@@2009kdizzletbf bump stocks kinda suck. It's a cool gimmick but honestly after using one Id rather stick to regular old buttstock. Not saying they should be banned. Nothing should be banned. I can live without one. There's other ways to get a rock n roll switch 😊

  • @bobbobbington3615
    @bobbobbington3615 6 місяців тому +1

    So that eDuCaToR's belief is that because she doesn't personally know a hunter using an AR, that the AR should be banned? What? Sweetheart, the Second doesn't have anything to do with hunting.

  • @CallMeCU8E
    @CallMeCU8E 6 місяців тому

    Look mom I'm on the news!

  • @KeepGuns
    @KeepGuns 7 місяців тому +4

    "How are the Democrats out there Ollie?"
    "They're cold!"

  • @tman8939
    @tman8939 6 місяців тому

    A gal gets a dui, I guess we need to ban cars for driving her around.

  • @jerrypeal653
    @jerrypeal653 6 місяців тому

    Never give up your self protection. Unconstitutional laws must never be adhered to !

  • @sukabuttyahu2343
    @sukabuttyahu2343 6 місяців тому

    Ban Cars, ban all relgions force everyone to go to church since that was a First here!
    Guess another Round of Coloradians Will be Moving. I sure am if they continue with this..New Governor this Polis has been in seat too long

  • @arthurrodarte8624
    @arthurrodarte8624 6 місяців тому

    “Don’t tread on me”

  • @miriamschiro8585
    @miriamschiro8585 7 місяців тому +3

    She hasa right to self defense is by excuse to be excuse to hava gun because if that’s the case WE ALL SHOULD ALSO HAVA WEAPON BECAUSE WE ALL HAVA RIGHT FOR SELF DEFENSE SMS with the high crimes of mass shooting here in America that does not like good

  • @Rectitude4U
    @Rectitude4U 7 місяців тому +1

    Molon labe.

  • @mrich9654
    @mrich9654 7 місяців тому +1

    So glad I moved to Utah.

  • @nicholaspike6158
    @nicholaspike6158 7 місяців тому

    Hahaha

  • @JRC1221
    @JRC1221 7 місяців тому +5

    Omg teachers are so stupid

  • @LeeTurner-p3d
    @LeeTurner-p3d 6 місяців тому

    Ban all semi auto firearms. Back to revolvers and bolt action lol

  • @gear59ok
    @gear59ok 7 місяців тому +2

    Colofornia

    • @AK-76er
      @AK-76er 5 місяців тому

      Not yet...not yet....