@@mr.jamster8414 Why? If the bombs fall, it'll be all over. They'll aim several big ones key places but missiles will almost never hit exact where they want and our enemies don't exactly have many great bombers that can make it here, hide from our defenses etc
@@burtan2000 Break up Civilisation to make something better out of the world... Frying Venison on the abandoned superhighway... Fight Club was cool, haven't seen mad max tho.
Modern times make me question why we ever stopped this, unfortunately... Now many people feel like we need to be ready and they aren't wrong. I guess I'm starting my iodine and bottlecap collection early...
Probably in part due to delivery tech being so advanced that a lot of the info is effectively useless. When this was made the main form of delivery would’ve been mainly by planes and ICBMs. Nowadays it’s ICBMs, subs and possibly hypersonic shit. Instead of hours you have at best minutes to react. You’d be dead before even hearing the warning
Gotta love the optimistic scenario of evacuating the cities. A steady flow of traffic in areas which routinely gridlock on a given day when used by a relatively small percentage of the population who aren't in a state of panic. Millions of people descending on a rural community and being welcomed with open arms. Millions of refugees who may suddenly find themselves with no home or job to return to, while hopelessly straining the resources of their hosts. No way that could end badly.
From what I’ve read on “Wired”, like the UK’s “Protect and Survive” films, this would have been aired in the US if possible nuclear war were imminent.
Рік тому+24
This one doesn't seem to be targeted for that case, but rather for "peacetime" education of the general public. While Protect and Survive is targeted for immediate danger.
@@irvan36mm You want to see that "protect and survive" urgency? You want to see how prepared the government is for a nuclear attack? Check out the "Nuclear Preparedness PSA" by the NYC Emergency Management.
"Hey guys, dont worry. If you arent dead and your house is intact, its safe to live in 2 days after the blast because all the fallout went bye bye. After this, its just EZ wins for nato" - the narrator probably
Americans don't realise how gently the powers that be went on them. We in the UK got "Protect & Survive" and "Threads", traumatising whole generations.
We got , "The Day After "here in 1983. I was very scared after seeing that . i was in 7th grade. I m not sure if its true but it had an effect on President Regan too i heard.
Don't forget "Duck and cover" for my mother's generation. Daily drills climbing under her desk drilled to spot the flash. Her neighbor had a bomb shelter and would torment her and other kids they would all die and her family would survive. Don't know why anyone would think Americans had it easy??? It was BAD for all superpowers.
The date I find online for this film is 1978. I find that very difficult to believe. It has a very early sixties feel and it's very pre-MAD in outlook, which would date it before 1962. And speaking of MAD, I'm very mad that I'm looking at this. The wall fell, the USSR dissolved, and I thought I'd never have cold war anxiety ever again. The potential was still there, but we no longer had madmen pushing the limits. That is until now. It's like these old POS don't know how to operate outside of cold war conditions so they just had to start it up again.
The advice about having a radio is definitely outdated. A transistor set would be rendered useless by the EMP of a nuclear detonation, even 50-100 miles away. The old tube sets might shrug that off, but by 1970 or so, very few portable tube sets were still being made. Of course, one could argue that the set would only be needed PRIOR to a detonation. After the earth-shattering kaboom, there'd be nothing to listen to. And the strategies presented still seem to assume a bomber-based attack, with literally hours to warn and evacuate city populations. Once ICBMs became the preferred delivery system by the early 1960s, the reaction time is at most about 30-40 minutes. The info on siren signals is outdated, too. On the other hand, the film mentions FEMA - but that agency didn't exist until Pres. Carter created it by executive order. In 1979. My guess is they updated' footage from an older safety film, had someone re-narrate it, and called it 'done'. Remember, this was produced by the same government who told us duct tape and plastic drop cloths would protect us after 9/11. It's all to create the illusion that we could survive a nuclear war relatively unscathed.
As long as humans are human, there will be the threat of war, violene, devistaiton and destruction. Simply part of our nature. The only thing you can do is be good to spite evil.
USSR may be finally destroyed, but people survived, Russia has grown stronger through the horrible economy change, through crisis, through new antagonizations and all the attempts to create chaos and enemies in neighboring countries (the only real success so far is Ukraine). And at the same time, CPR has evolved, and grew stronger economically, politically, and militaristically, (partially thanks to USA). And as everyone suspects, USA doesn't want a second powerful country to exist, let alone a third one. That's why USA was shooting down it's own weather balloons, that's why they prepare for a war with China, arm their allies that are in proximity of China, move ships... Why can't we just live in peace, why do we have to antagonize other countries, other people, when they aren't doing anything wrong... Why push so hard for a nuclear world war, why coups, why steal oil... Eh, when I think about USA's actions, I start hating capitalism more and more.
There was a man that lived through BOTH bombings of Japan. He is proof that the advice in this video works if followed. Get underground, stay there for 2 weeks. The time to stockpile food and water is last month.
It's crazy to me how quickly information seems to evolve, these days, we wouldn't dare assume that the other 95% of the land would be "untouched", we would know that radiation, fallen infrastructure, and wildfires would leave the entire country devastated
I believe Kurzgesagt said something along the lines of "A nuclear attack would be like a hurricane, a wildfire, an earthquake and a nuclear accident all happening at the same time, except worse."
Almost everybody would. Most people think nuclear weapons are far more devastating than they actually are. They're terrifying, for sure, but they're also a long way from being doomsday weapons. Every nuclear warhead in existence could spontaneously detonate right now, and I doubt even 5% of people in the world would be directly affected.
Better than nothing! I do get that sort of PO'd feeling and think 'who signed me up for this?' Unfortionatly the reality is that we allow psychopaths to lead us.
Much of the advice was outdated by the early 1960s. The bits about evacuating major cities, for example. It was feasible when a nuclear attack would have been based on Soviet (propellor-driven!) bomber aircraft, which would give us several hours' worth of heads-up. Today? ICBM, and by the time the launch was detected and the warning raised, the civilian population would have just enough time to bend over, put their heads between their knees, and kiss their asses goodbye. Yes, really. 30-40 minutes at most. And the infrastructure is inadequate for normal rush hour; much less a mass evacuation. Odds are if you tried to flee, you'd die in your car within 5 miles of home. And if you stayed home? Not much better. The quality of housing construction over the last 40-odd years has declined quite a bit. Modern houses might just as well be made of cardboard. Most of the public shelters are gone now. The bit about private bomb shelters? That hasn't been much of a thing since Kennedy. Some of the information is still valid, but it's clear this film has not aged well at all. i'll admit that the valid bits are still better than nothing -= just barely. But don't fool yourself. We are NOT PREPARED for a full-on nuclear confrontation. Any remaining society would be crippled for decades.
My memory is that the scenario of nuclear winter only emerged in the 1980s. I believe this flim came out in the 1970s? Even in the 1980s, ongoing to today, there's continued to be disagreement about how severe the climitic effects of various magnitudes of nuclear war would be. The government, as imperfect as its always been, was attempting to do the best it could to reduce the horrific loss of life. Be interesting to see how our society responds if the threat of nuclear war reemerges in the 21st century. Even if odds are that most (or certainly many) of us would die, perhaps you could still have some choice about the manner, and time of your death. Obviously different people have different views about this. If you're of the view that it's better just to be vaporized in an instant, then this advice is of no interest to you. From what we know today even if you survive the more immediate effects of heat and blast, there's a good chance you'll still die of radiation sickness, exposure, or starvation. But these films can help you in mitigating some of those dangers... if you decide you want to live the life that it would likely be after a major nuclear war? It's your life, they're just giving you more options that allow you more choice as to how you want to live it, or not.
Kids today: "OK I see the bomb coming I am going to live stream my blaaaaaast shadoooow Chaaaaallleeeenge. For this I set up my pone to look at me an the wall behind me and I try to leave the wackiest black shadow when the bomb drops. Like and subscriiiiibe!!!!"
In the 80's scientists began deliberately exaggerating their data and painting a "worst case scenario" in order to turn people against nuclear weapons. In that atmosphere, suggesting that a nuclear war could be recovered from (or even that far away areas would be unaffected) was seen as being "pro war". The truth is that while the detonation areas and nearby countries would be destroyed, countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the lower halves of South America and Africa would have something of a chance.
@@zippymufo9765 Do we know that any exaggeration was deliberate? I agree with what you're saying is what we're hearing more today, but do we know have reason to believe that the scientists deliberately exaggerated? I don't believe I've heard that before.
@@pmccarthy001 As far as nuclear winter goes, there is a lot of documentation on that regarding deliberately fudged data and invalid models. For example, they'd base their models on having every detonation being a groundburst (which produces maximum fallout and crap thrown into the atmosphere) even though every nuclear power had switched their war protocols to air-burst detonations, which produces much less fallout and atmospheric crap. Then they'd presume that every warhead would be deployed, and that a certain number of non-participant countries would be targeted, without explaining why they thought this was a certainty.
@@zippymufo9765 Yeah, I believe I might have heard something about making some unrealistic assumption that every warhead would be used... I didn't know that they assumed that every detonation would be a groundburst. As far as airburst and groundburst protocols are concerned I believe there are still plans to employ groundbursts under certain circumstances. My understanding is that groundbursts have always been more effective in destroying underground bunkers, for example. I don't know, but a groundburst might be more reliably for destroying runways on airfields, for example too. Perhaps you could more reliably destroy a runway on an airfield with a lower yield groundburst than what might be necessary if one employed an airburst. For a missile silo I'd think you'd probably have the same calculus. That is, you could probably achieve an equal probability of destroying a missile silo with a ground burst with a lower yield warhead then would be necessary with an airburst. Of course, none of this is precisely black and white. It's the height of detonation set. I don't know how low the height of detonation would need to be such that it might be considered a groundburst,... except, of course, it's presumably below a height that is considered an airburst. I don't know what the conventions are for those heights? For soft targets, not having underground bunkers that might need to be destroyed, then airbursts would clearly be favored as the destruction on the ground will be greater. I suspect that if (or, perhaps when) these weapons are set lose in any kind of attack including heavy counterforce and perhaps disruption of command and control, I doubt their focus is going to be much on the loss of life of the adversary, nor the ecological damage. I think their focus will be on reducing the retaliatory capability of the adversary nation to minimize loss of life and damage to one's own nation. When you start talking nuclear war you get into some pretty nasty calculus.
sucks that im watching this as an informational piece to potentially keep myself and my family alive instead of just a "man they really had to worry about something like this.. what a different world" everything seems to be the same as it ever was
what they don't mention here is that the plastic trash bags they tell you to store in your fallout shelter are for wrapping bodies, Protect & Survive made that clear
I lived about 2 miles from Cincinnati Milling Machine Company. At that time a world leader of machining equipment. We were basically told as long as we covered our heads we would be OK. 😆
Even as a child in the 1970s, when we were still doing those old 'duck and cover' drills in school, I knew that it was rubbish. It might work in more rural areas, but if you live in a city that is a designated a target - K. Y. A. G. Though I suppose it might improve your odds SLIGHTLY.
@xaenon even a 10 year old could look at a picture of Hiroshima and knowing a hydrogen bomb was 1,000 times more powerful figure out covering your head with your hands was a complete waste of time.
(defcon: the game of nuclear war. everyone loses, but can you lose the least? to kill will kill more, and nuclear war is a instant M.A.D or mutually assured destruction.)
If you like this video don't forget to Like and Subscribe more videos like this coming soon. CD3WD Project - Online Library of Survival Stuff www.cd3wdproject.org/ Plus links to more videos. The Atlas Evolution Of The ICBM ua-cam.com/video/xtLY6tYoMtU/v-deo.html Protection in the Nuclear Age ua-cam.com/video/AfsljpodaWY/v-deo.html Protection Against Chemical and Biological Warfare ua-cam.com/video/monxy6Ng49w/v-deo.html
Remembering it was from the same era, Neville Shute's book "On The Beach" should be required reading for everybody to understand how quickly things can get out of hand and that there are no survivors in a nuclear war.
"On The Beach" is a book, not reality. In the book, almost all of the nuclear weapons are "cobalt bombs" which produce dramatically more fallout and have about a 5 year half life. "Cobalt bombs" have never been developed, and only exist in theoretical designs. No country currently has them in their inventory, and likely never will due to nuclear test bans.
Shute's book was propaganda, and its scientifically dubious that fallout would travel that far to Australia in a high enough concentration to kill off everyone. This is part of the reason why the "nuclear winter" theory was proposed, so that politicized scientists could claim that even areas far away from nuclear detonations would be wiped out.
@@TheSkullConfernece Surviving is one thing, but surviving with a "Specific Plan", is quite another ! . . . Which one are YOU ?. ( A PLAN, is why I have an EMP "Proof" vehicle. )
Back then, it was more like than you think. People believed in preparedness and that a nuke being dropped wasn't the end of all things. The perception of nukes in the height of the cold war wasn't the same as it is today. The only popular 'exposure' the public had to the effects of atomic warfare was the aftereffects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While horrific, those bombs had a lesser yield, different technology, and both those places had mostly been rebuilt by that point, and it was different than the weapons that had been developed at the time of this film (unknown to the American people at that point). The attitude of survival and pulling through to the next day was different- people who watched this had parents or family or friends who lived through the Depression, both world wars, and maybe even the Holocaust. The outlook was not as it is in the present, and this depiction fit the contemporary popular mindset. Sure, it was a lie, but a country needs people to have a future, and a bunch of people without hope or motivation won't try and even prepare for survival.
Areas around the plant are getting better, but the Russian troops fucked themselves over pretty hard when they dug trenches in contaminated soil and lived in them for a while. Oops.
Lower wavelengths (i.e radio) pierce material easier than higher wavelengths (i.e Gamma Ray, X-ray) It's how we don't see through walls but heat cameras can and so does your phone's antenna
I thought radiation stayed longer than a week. Is fallout radiation different from radiation from, say, nuclear energy waste or chemical facilities? Idk much about radiation.
@@amadeosendiulo2137 I know it is still pronounced in many rural areas, and perhaps in scotland and ireland, but at that time it seemed quite more common even in urban areas.
Very heavily borrowed from _11 Steps to Survival_ produced several years before, this was a co-production of Canadian and American civil defense agencies.
Yep the NFB is credited at the end and a lot of the same scenes from 11 Steps to Survival are present. You can tell this and 11 Steps was like a B-team NFB project from the quality but they still cared.
@@KingThrillgore 11 Steps predates this film by several years. Some cleaning up of the animation may have been completed, but some of the text titles used in 11 Steps were actually less generic (Protection looks like someone went nuts with Letraset.) By the time MAD as a docrine became entrenched, most of the knowledge we had surrounding preparedness measures had done the same. When _Protect and Survive_ was leaked in 1980, the information had not changed significantly from what had been available over twenty years before in the UK. What had changed, however, was the sentiment among many ordinary citizens towards government motives for providing such information in the first place.
@Pom Tubes Following total atomic annihilation, the rebuilding of this great nation of ours may fall to you. Thats why we at Vault-Tec have prepared these educational materials for you to better understand the 7 defining attributes that make you S.P.E.C.I.A.L. Today we will focus on strength. In the wasteland essential supplies will be scarce. When an item of value is found keep it close and away from bullies. The stronger you are the more you can carry. Be sure to know your limits or you may find it challenging to escape from hazardous scenarios no matter how strong you are. There are other situations where you may find yourself in close proximity to unfriendly neighbors. For such cases you must learn to defend yourself using your natural strength. Use anything sharp or sturdy enough to swing. Get creative with your implement, but stay reasonable and look for anything that can further enhance you innate vigor. The greater your strength the greater the impact but remember, some moments require more than muscle. In this chapter we will focus on perception. It is the unfortunate truth that when you go above ground you will be faced with many post nuclear nuisances. These frightening menaces will come in all different shapes and sizes and pose an immediate threat to your survival. You must learn to deal with these dangers but may find this challenging at first. Thats why we’ve provided you with the Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System so you can scan the threat and pinpoint areas of weakness, and the higher your perception the more accurate you will be. Well you’ll put Davey Crocket to shame. There may be times where you must engage in questionable activities ahem. Your perception can help keep you safe during these morally ambiguous moments. Practice your pilfering on youths, the elderly, or the incapacitated. As you continue to purloin your way to success try more challenging targets, and more skillful techniques for greater returns. Don’t get to cocky there sport. Our topic today is endurance. We will all be faced with many new and unfamiliar health risk, such as infection, sudden loss of limb, and above all harmful radiation. Fortunately your formidable endurance has turned your body into a hard working machine that can resist the harmful affects of radiation and physical violence. Like any machine then your body must be well maintained to stay in tip top shape. While average Joe’s will survive on old packaged standby’s your ironclad insides will allow you to seek fresh meat. Radiation poisoning may have enlarged your favorite meals. This means more helpful nutrition for you. Take caution not to bite off more than you can chew. Endurance can also provide new options for food, some of which can be an acquired taste. Gone are the days of exercising for fun. Instead you will need to combine athletics with crucial survival activities. The greater your endurance the further you can go. Just be certain to be mindful of others. And now charisma, what is it made of? Unlike the clean, wholesome America you may recall the wasteland will be a distrustful place full of unsavory characters and a few morals. Earning the trust of your fellow man is an often overlooked key to survival. One way to prove your trustworthiness is through fair commercial exchange. Your renowned charisma will enable more favorable bartering. Don’t get greedy now. Use your charismatic nature to negotiate your way out if tense moments. Having friends is always if value. How else do I find friends you may wonder. You may find an impromptu cocktail hour helps to ease social stress. Your charisma will help you avoid the paroles of addiction, but not the immediate affects of drink, so practice moderation or you’ll find out who your real friends are the hard way. You will find that even wild animals can be charmed by your charisma. Looks like you’ve found a new pal. Oh ho, don’t get carried away there bug fella. Our next area of attention is intelligence. With all the talk of physical survival in the wasteland, you may forget that sometimes its survival of the smartest. An empty mind is a vessel for knowledge and intelligence is the key to unlocking opportunity and adapting to your new world above ground. Your advanced know how will grant you access to new places and new technologies. Space age isn’t it? Intelligent survivors are also more inventive, creating technological wonders of their own. Note that the “s” in science stands for safety, and when the tables are turned against you don’t be afraid to set aside your refined intelligence for the raw instincts of survival. Just don’t lose your head. Now lets discuss the uses of agility. A nuclear blast and the subsequent fallout will have many adverse effects on life as we know it. Intensive prolonged radiation exposure may transform those above ground into decrepit rotting beings that have lost their ability to reason. They will likely be without common manners and quick to anger. You must learn to make the most of available firearms, but enthusiasm will only take you so far. Now lets try that again, and remember that with your impressive agility you can act more decisively in V.A.T.S. See? Its a snap. Agility can also help you out in difficult moments, but why place yourself under unducped stress? Instead try a subtler route. Taking the quieter approach is always worth consideration. Your agility can turn a sneak attack into a complete tactical move. Keep in mind others may have the same bright idea. Got your rabbits foot? Good, Its time we talk about luck. The difference between whether you live or die in the post nuclear world may depend on the flip of a coin. Luck is a mysterious source of curiosity. See here? A well placed shot may not always do the trick. If Lady Luck favors you though, you’ll find those critical moments a breeze. What’s this? Only scrounging up duds? Time and patience may net you a suitable collection, but with luck on your side you’re bound to find some swell keepers. No no, hold on to anything shiny. It may be of hidden value. Be careful not to get distracted by your new found fortunes. Uh oh, that wasn’t the only test. It looks like luck has helped you once again, unfortunately she can’t save you from every situation. At least your misfortune can become someone else’s fortune. Keep doing your push ups and chin ups because there’s more strength can do for you. Always look to sharpen your 5 senses, for perception doesn’t stop there. Build your endurance and soon you will find ways that it improves your life above ground. Though you see, picking the charismatic approach is more than just good manners. Advanced learning in the field of intelligence can offer even more benefits in this modern age of wonders. Your agility will help you move through the wasteland with ease and yield other benefits. Luck may be fickle but if you can wu her to your side the possibilities are endless. Swing for the fences like the pro- crafting specialized protective gear to keep- or building clever weapons to wield in keenly assessing the unfriendly locals and terrain- handling sensitive munitions with- and building a long distance relationship- added confidence in the swimming pool- stronger more resilient limbs to keep- flesh of your fellow man can provide- working with mans best friend is- means more loyal companions will- convincing others to act on your behalf and- start navigating with technological ease- keep blood were it belongs by healing- in creating more potent chemical compounds from- assaulting an unsuspecting dreamer for the- in hastily reloading your firearm to-, replying on damage to additional targets when the- a particularly bloody mess will- a chance to build a streak of destruction that- the magic of the unexpected all- regularly study your Vault-Tech provided materials to prepare for survival, and to answer the question: do you know what makes you S.P.E.C.I.A.L?
I grew up from the 60s to the 80s, the height of the Cold War. My generation (X) had very pragmatic views on nuclear Armageddon - if it happened, it happened, there really wasn’t much we could do about it. Our anxiety was mostly caused by the secretive and paranoid nature of every Soviet commie leader until Gorbachev became General Secretary of the USSR. The best years this country ever had in the 20th century were from 1989 to 2000 - the Berlin Wall came down, communism in Eastern Europe crashed under the weight of its own cruelty, and then on Christmas Day 1991 the USSR just up and disappeared. For just over a decade the American people (and everyone else) could all breathe again, we had escaped the nuclear Sword of Damocles that JFK had warned the world about. This country really hasn’t been the same since 9/11 - we’ve changed as a people, and not for the better.
You're absolutely right I appear to be a little younger than you I grew up in the '70s to '90s and our best years are definitely behind us in this country. I also believe you're accurate on your assumption that the turning point was 9/11 although I do think it has drastically accelerated in the past few years. There's not a day that goes by that I don't think about the '90s for the most part and I worry quite a bit about the direction of everything. And really bothers me because I have two kids who are yet 18 and I worry what they are going to have to go through for the rest of their life.
Okay. One long blast, hurricane. Nuclear bomb, either a wavering sound, short toots from a whistle, the sound of a horn, or any other alarm doing what it does. Got it!
I still remember during my day in the draft(months ago btw), they gave us a paper about the milltary ritual things and on the back side of it has one section talk about how to deal with nuke step by step, my first thought was that is funny.
I kinda find this entire Film really sad radiation comes a horn blasts familys take shelter idk somrtimes i just cry for no Reisen in Videos of photos yoir Not supposed to cry about LISTEN IM JUST A VERY EMOTIONAL PERSON!
What should I do if I get blinded by the multiple flashes, vaporised by the heat, chopped into a thousand pieces by flying debris, have my ears & lungs blasted apart by the shockwaves, become irradiated into a soup by the many, many fallout storms, & lose my marbles through 6 months of living in shoebox under the endless rubble, dead body parts, & deceased loved ones all over the shop? I live in the country's second city, so we can expect at least a thousand 100Kt, to 3Mt surface & air blasts to contend with.
after 2 days, 99% of radiaiton is gone I can''t help laughing
Рік тому+23
Tbh this is quite true, radiation decresases on a logarithmic scale, decreasing very fast at first but very slowly afterwards. The 1% left takes decades to decay. But if the 1% left is already enough to be dangerous, just imagine what the "100%" means.
It really depends on if it is an Air or Land Blast. If it goes off high up most of the radiation is gone after a few days, If it goes off on land then it will stick around for years.
It comes from so called 7-10 rule obeying t^-1,2 function. Every 7-fold increase in time causes roughly 10-fold decrease in radiation level. When it's related to the situation 1 hour after the explosion, we've got the radiation level decreased 10 times after 7 hours and 100 times (99% gone) after 49 hours ≈2 days.
Sounds like there's a hidden audio channel being played with another voice, you can hear it well around 21:40. I wonder what that is. A different channel for another language? Intrusive sound in the studio?
if it takes 2 weeks for fallout to be gone then why after 200 years fallout 3 still looks like first day of nuclear blast? check and mate bethesda bots
the eas would do that now a days, our warning device is the cell phone in our pocket, they will text a warning message to our phones, sirens only were made to warn people outdoors
i clicked on this split between whether this was analog horror or actual history, considering the channel name. ive yet to verify but the description tells me that its the latter...
1: don't get caught in the flash 2: how can you be 15 miles from a major city and *not* be in that city? IG if you live on a state border, or across a 15 mile wide river... Nukemap says China's current ICBM's will kill you if you're in the flash, so get as far away from any windows as you can IG... 3: just leave the city lmao
The Romans conquered all of the Mediterranean for sheer power, Spain built an Empire from it’s lust for gold, Hitler rose a Crippled Germany from Economic ruin, and war, war never changes
Fallout series' fallout is much different than real fallout. The radiation remains for hundreds of years and mutates creatures in fallout. None of that really happens irl (other than the radiation, MAYBE.)
Japan got nuked twice and it wasn’t the end of the world for Japan. America in particularly is a vastly larger country. Nobody’s acting like it’s a “minor inconvenience”. That’s just you being the exact opposite, overly fearful as if there’ll be no hope so there’s no point even trying. This is educational on what you should at least know if a nuke is hitting near your location. The people outside the direct blast radius where buildings are still standing can obviously survive if they’re informed on what to do.
The bombs in Japan were toys compared to the later Hydrogen bombs . The primer that detonates little boy was conventional gun powder. The detonating primer to set off a hydrogen is an atomic bomb explosion.
@@casualcadaver I'm pretty sure the bigger deal is the fact if we had a nuclear war, more than just 2 nukes would be used. They could destroy a larger area by just dropping more nukes over it. The primary targets are still going to be where most people are packed together, which is cities. Also a nuclear war becomes more about the size of your territory. It obviously wouldn't be a fair fight between Japan and America, since America wouldn't need as many nukes as Japan would. But i'm pretty sure if 2 large countries were nuking each other, they'd at least be able to do as much damage as each other, and so the leaders would have a truce. Also that's the reason America didn't nuke Tokyo. Because without any leadership left, they probably wouldn't come to a sensible surender.
The Soviets had 45,000 nuclear missiles. The U.S. 11,000. How healthy do you think the planet would be after 56,000 nuclear detonations with one 90-minute period?
Very spooky at times, I find myself really feeling for the blue guys, the one hiding in a ditch waiting to die was pretty evocative, also Guy Talking On Radio's gotta be my fav new Guy
Assuming I live at least 50 miles away from a blast, I can live in my basement for two weeks. After that, I go full Mad Max.
check you ain't near a war setup mabob
Can I be your faithful side kick, that one day would take a bullet for you bro
@@mr.jamster8414 Why? If the bombs fall, it'll be all over. They'll aim several big ones key places but missiles will almost never hit exact where they want and our enemies don't exactly have many great bombers that can make it here, hide from our defenses etc
Mad Max is a given. It's a necessity.
@@burtan2000 Break up Civilisation to make something better out of the world... Frying Venison on the abandoned superhighway... Fight Club was cool, haven't seen mad max tho.
Modern times make me question why we ever stopped this, unfortunately... Now many people feel like we need to be ready and they aren't wrong.
I guess I'm starting my iodine and bottlecap collection early...
Probably in part due to delivery tech being so advanced that a lot of the info is effectively useless. When this was made the main form of delivery would’ve been mainly by planes and ICBMs. Nowadays it’s ICBMs, subs and possibly hypersonic shit. Instead of hours you have at best minutes to react. You’d be dead before even hearing the warning
Gotta love the optimistic scenario of evacuating the cities. A steady flow of traffic in areas which routinely gridlock on a given day when used by a relatively small percentage of the population who aren't in a state of panic. Millions of people descending on a rural community and being welcomed with open arms. Millions of refugees who may suddenly find themselves with no home or job to return to, while hopelessly straining the resources of their hosts. No way that could end badly.
The blueains died in 2081
💀
thought they said tail
This is some fallout type bs
analog horror creators watching this: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN
For real though.
I love horror analog:-)
I don’t know how you can make something so unnerving and creepy but also informative at the same time
Ikr
Lack of music
Ever heard of SCP?
@@SquidCena no
Saddest thing about this is how accurate it is.
Especially the size of North America
this is 100% bullshit. when the trigger gets pulled, there will be nothing but radioactive debris where the earth used to be.
Dust in the wind.
@@atarian345 😨
??? What do you mean
@@TreadTheDonutDuck We would not all die in a nuclear war. There would be many survivors that would have to pick up the pieces in the aftermath.
From what I’ve read on “Wired”, like the UK’s “Protect and Survive” films, this would have been aired in the US if possible nuclear war were imminent.
This one doesn't seem to be targeted for that case, but rather for "peacetime" education of the general public. While Protect and Survive is targeted for immediate danger.
@ Very true. This doesn’t have the sense of urgency that “Protect And Survive” had.
@@irvan36mm You want to see that "protect and survive" urgency? You want to see how prepared the government is for a nuclear attack? Check out the "Nuclear Preparedness PSA" by the NYC Emergency Management.
Whoever the narrator is, they are somewhat comforting.
A nice voice to hear as we die.
"Hey guys, dont worry. If you arent dead and your house is intact, its safe to live in 2 days after the blast because all the fallout went bye bye. After this, its just EZ wins for nato" - the narrator probably
I feel like I hear him in a lot of older things
@@Someguy-ze7kp Rod serling from Twilight zone?
Americans don't realise how gently the powers that be went on them. We in the UK got "Protect & Survive" and "Threads", traumatising whole generations.
We got , "The Day After "here in 1983. I was very scared after seeing that . i was in 7th grade. I m not sure if its true but it had an effect on President Regan too i heard.
Back in the 1950's and 1960's American schools regularly conducted atomic bomb drills.
Don't forget "Duck and cover" for my mother's generation. Daily drills climbing under her desk drilled to spot the flash. Her neighbor had a bomb shelter and would torment her and other kids they would all die and her family would survive. Don't know why anyone would think Americans had it easy??? It was BAD for all superpowers.
Those are some kind of scary.
and the way the wind blows
The date I find online for this film is 1978. I find that very difficult to believe. It has a very early sixties feel and it's very pre-MAD in outlook, which would date it before 1962. And speaking of MAD, I'm very mad that I'm looking at this. The wall fell, the USSR dissolved, and I thought I'd never have cold war anxiety ever again. The potential was still there, but we no longer had madmen pushing the limits. That is until now. It's like these old POS don't know how to operate outside of cold war conditions so they just had to start it up again.
The advice about having a radio is definitely outdated. A transistor set would be rendered useless by the EMP of a nuclear detonation, even 50-100 miles away. The old tube sets might shrug that off, but by 1970 or so, very few portable tube sets were still being made. Of course, one could argue that the set would only be needed PRIOR to a detonation. After the earth-shattering kaboom, there'd be nothing to listen to.
And the strategies presented still seem to assume a bomber-based attack, with literally hours to warn and evacuate city populations. Once ICBMs became the preferred delivery system by the early 1960s, the reaction time is at most about 30-40 minutes.
The info on siren signals is outdated, too.
On the other hand, the film mentions FEMA - but that agency didn't exist until Pres. Carter created it by executive order. In 1979.
My guess is they updated' footage from an older safety film, had someone re-narrate it, and called it 'done'. Remember, this was produced by the same government who told us duct tape and plastic drop cloths would protect us after 9/11. It's all to create the illusion that we could survive a nuclear war relatively unscathed.
Nothing changed except your perception
As long as humans are human, there will be the threat of war, violene, devistaiton and destruction. Simply part of our nature. The only thing you can do is be good to spite evil.
USSR may be finally destroyed, but people survived, Russia has grown stronger through the horrible economy change, through crisis, through new antagonizations and all the attempts to create chaos and enemies in neighboring countries (the only real success so far is Ukraine). And at the same time, CPR has evolved, and grew stronger economically, politically, and militaristically, (partially thanks to USA). And as everyone suspects, USA doesn't want a second powerful country to exist, let alone a third one. That's why USA was shooting down it's own weather balloons, that's why they prepare for a war with China, arm their allies that are in proximity of China, move ships...
Why can't we just live in peace, why do we have to antagonize other countries, other people, when they aren't doing anything wrong... Why push so hard for a nuclear world war, why coups, why steal oil... Eh, when I think about USA's actions, I start hating capitalism more and more.
It believable
Why does it feel so much like a Twilight Zone episode
There was a man that lived through BOTH bombings of Japan. He is proof that the advice in this video works if followed.
Get underground, stay there for 2 weeks. The time to stockpile food and water is last month.
It's crazy to me how quickly information seems to evolve, these days, we wouldn't dare assume that the other 95% of the land would be "untouched", we would know that radiation, fallen infrastructure, and wildfires would leave the entire country devastated
I believe Kurzgesagt said something along the lines of "A nuclear attack would be like a hurricane, a wildfire, an earthquake and a nuclear accident all happening at the same time, except worse."
This is the scariest kind of analog horror... Real film.
Oh my god! They showed us this in 5th grade and I am still terrified. I had nightmares for years. To this day I still remember mass, distance,time.
*If something does happen admittedly I have zero hope any will survive such an event. This is an eerie film!*
Almost everybody would. Most people think nuclear weapons are far more devastating than they actually are. They're terrifying, for sure, but they're also a long way from being doomsday weapons. Every nuclear warhead in existence could spontaneously detonate right now, and I doubt even 5% of people in the world would be directly affected.
i mean people did survive the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings, unless you're right on the fireball there is a chance you could survive.
The advice Is excellent, I don't know what people find objectionable in this.
Better than nothing! I do get that sort of PO'd feeling and think 'who signed me up for this?' Unfortionatly the reality is that we allow psychopaths to lead us.
Much of the advice was outdated by the early 1960s. The bits about evacuating major cities, for example. It was feasible when a nuclear attack would have been based on Soviet (propellor-driven!) bomber aircraft, which would give us several hours' worth of heads-up. Today? ICBM, and by the time the launch was detected and the warning raised, the civilian population would have just enough time to bend over, put their heads between their knees, and kiss their asses goodbye. Yes, really. 30-40 minutes at most. And the infrastructure is inadequate for normal rush hour; much less a mass evacuation. Odds are if you tried to flee, you'd die in your car within 5 miles of home. And if you stayed home? Not much better. The quality of housing construction over the last 40-odd years has declined quite a bit. Modern houses might just as well be made of cardboard.
Most of the public shelters are gone now. The bit about private bomb shelters? That hasn't been much of a thing since Kennedy.
Some of the information is still valid, but it's clear this film has not aged well at all. i'll admit that the valid bits are still better than nothing -= just barely. But don't fool yourself. We are NOT PREPARED for a full-on nuclear confrontation. Any remaining society would be crippled for decades.
@@CampbellCornLab "unfortionatly" looks like you've already been affected by fallout.
@@TheSkullConfernece Strong want someone to eat
This is so much more relevant now than it has been in recent years given the situation in Ukraine and in the Taiwan Strait.
My memory is that the scenario of nuclear winter only emerged in the 1980s. I believe this flim came out in the 1970s? Even in the 1980s, ongoing to today, there's continued to be disagreement about how severe the climitic effects of various magnitudes of nuclear war would be. The government, as imperfect as its always been, was attempting to do the best it could to reduce the horrific loss of life. Be interesting to see how our society responds if the threat of nuclear war reemerges in the 21st century. Even if odds are that most (or certainly many) of us would die, perhaps you could still have some choice about the manner, and time of your death. Obviously different people have different views about this. If you're of the view that it's better just to be vaporized in an instant, then this advice is of no interest to you. From what we know today even if you survive the more immediate effects of heat and blast, there's a good chance you'll still die of radiation sickness, exposure, or starvation. But these films can help you in mitigating some of those dangers... if you decide you want to live the life that it would likely be after a major nuclear war? It's your life, they're just giving you more options that allow you more choice as to how you want to live it, or not.
Kids today: "OK I see the bomb coming I am going to live stream my blaaaaaast shadoooow Chaaaaallleeeenge. For this I set up my pone to look at me an the wall behind me and I try to leave the wackiest black shadow when the bomb drops. Like and subscriiiiibe!!!!"
In the 80's scientists began deliberately exaggerating their data and painting a "worst case scenario" in order to turn people against nuclear weapons. In that atmosphere, suggesting that a nuclear war could be recovered from (or even that far away areas would be unaffected) was seen as being "pro war". The truth is that while the detonation areas and nearby countries would be destroyed, countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the lower halves of South America and Africa would have something of a chance.
@@zippymufo9765 Do we know that any exaggeration was deliberate? I agree with what you're saying is what we're hearing more today, but do we know have reason to believe that the scientists deliberately exaggerated? I don't believe I've heard that before.
@@pmccarthy001 As far as nuclear winter goes, there is a lot of documentation on that regarding deliberately fudged data and invalid models. For example, they'd base their models on having every detonation being a groundburst (which produces maximum fallout and crap thrown into the atmosphere) even though every nuclear power had switched their war protocols to air-burst detonations, which produces much less fallout and atmospheric crap. Then they'd presume that every warhead would be deployed, and that a certain number of non-participant countries would be targeted, without explaining why they thought this was a certainty.
@@zippymufo9765 Yeah, I believe I might have heard something about making some unrealistic assumption that every warhead would be used... I didn't know that they assumed that every detonation would be a groundburst. As far as airburst and groundburst protocols are concerned I believe there are still plans to employ groundbursts under certain circumstances. My understanding is that groundbursts have always been more effective in destroying underground bunkers, for example. I don't know, but a groundburst might be more reliably for destroying runways on airfields, for example too. Perhaps you could more reliably destroy a runway on an airfield with a lower yield groundburst than what might be necessary if one employed an airburst. For a missile silo I'd think you'd probably have the same calculus. That is, you could probably achieve an equal probability of destroying a missile silo with a ground burst with a lower yield warhead then would be necessary with an airburst. Of course, none of this is precisely black and white. It's the height of detonation set. I don't know how low the height of detonation would need to be such that it might be considered a groundburst,... except, of course, it's presumably below a height that is considered an airburst. I don't know what the conventions are for those heights? For soft targets, not having underground bunkers that might need to be destroyed, then airbursts would clearly be favored as the destruction on the ground will be greater. I suspect that if (or, perhaps when) these weapons are set lose in any kind of attack including heavy counterforce and perhaps disruption of command and control, I doubt their focus is going to be much on the loss of life of the adversary, nor the ecological damage. I think their focus will be on reducing the retaliatory capability of the adversary nation to minimize loss of life and damage to one's own nation. When you start talking nuclear war you get into some pretty nasty calculus.
Thanks, this information will come useful in the next possible few years.
Glad it was helpful!
Ummm, let's hope not. But who knows with crazy Putin.
sucks that im watching this as an informational piece to potentially keep myself and my family alive instead of just a "man they really had to worry about something like this.. what a different world" everything seems to be the same as it ever was
The most important thing you can do is get right with Christ while you still have time.
what they don't mention here is that the plastic trash bags they tell you to store in your fallout shelter are for wrapping bodies, Protect & Survive made that clear
I lived about 2 miles from Cincinnati Milling Machine Company. At that time a world leader of machining equipment. We were basically told as long as we covered our heads we would be OK. 😆
Even as a child in the 1970s, when we were still doing those old 'duck and cover' drills in school, I knew that it was rubbish. It might work in more rural areas, but if you live in a city that is a designated a target - K. Y. A. G.
Though I suppose it might improve your odds SLIGHTLY.
@xaenon even a 10 year old could look at a picture of Hiroshima and knowing a hydrogen bomb was 1,000 times more powerful figure out covering your head with your hands was a complete waste of time.
(defcon: the game of nuclear war. everyone loses, but can you lose the least? to kill will kill more, and nuclear war is a instant M.A.D or mutually assured destruction.)
If you like this video don't forget to Like and Subscribe more videos like this coming soon. CD3WD Project - Online Library of Survival Stuff www.cd3wdproject.org/ Plus links to more videos.
The Atlas Evolution Of The ICBM
ua-cam.com/video/xtLY6tYoMtU/v-deo.html
Protection in the Nuclear Age
ua-cam.com/video/AfsljpodaWY/v-deo.html
Protection Against Chemical and Biological Warfare
ua-cam.com/video/monxy6Ng49w/v-deo.html
you still making these?
@@gery5529 Yes I just uploaded 2 The other week I hope to upload one or two in the coming days also if not today
This will come handy in near future
Game look who like ?
In today's age I cant tell if this is offical or an ARG
Fr bro fr
2:30, but, boy, radiation IS devastating.
This is the most unnerving use of a Fender Rhodes piano I've ever heard
I just love it when ever I find an old documentation that stays even nowadays accurate ... so rare.
Remembering it was from the same era, Neville Shute's book "On The Beach" should be required reading for everybody to understand how quickly things can get out of hand and that there are no survivors in a nuclear war.
It was nothing but the "Liberals" telling you, that your ALL GOING TO DIE . . . a complete line of "Bullshit" !
"On The Beach" is a book, not reality. In the book, almost all of the nuclear weapons are "cobalt bombs" which produce dramatically more fallout and have about a 5 year half life.
"Cobalt bombs" have never been developed, and only exist in theoretical designs. No country currently has them in their inventory, and likely never will due to nuclear test bans.
Shute's book was propaganda, and its scientifically dubious that fallout would travel that far to Australia in a high enough concentration to kill off everyone.
This is part of the reason why the "nuclear winter" theory was proposed, so that politicized scientists could claim that even areas far away from nuclear detonations would be wiped out.
But there would definitely be survivors in a nuclear war. Millions of people would survive and not even the nuclear fallout could eradicate everyone.
@@TheSkullConfernece Surviving is one thing, but surviving with a "Specific Plan", is quite another ! . . . Which one are YOU ?. ( A PLAN, is why I have an EMP "Proof" vehicle. )
Bro you're talking about the mushroom war?
Back then, it was more like than you think. People believed in preparedness and that a nuke being dropped wasn't the end of all things. The perception of nukes in the height of the cold war wasn't the same as it is today. The only popular 'exposure' the public had to the effects of atomic warfare was the aftereffects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While horrific, those bombs had a lesser yield, different technology, and both those places had mostly been rebuilt by that point, and it was different than the weapons that had been developed at the time of this film (unknown to the American people at that point). The attitude of survival and pulling through to the next day was different- people who watched this had parents or family or friends who lived through the Depression, both world wars, and maybe even the Holocaust. The outlook was not as it is in the present, and this depiction fit the contemporary popular mindset. Sure, it was a lie, but a country needs people to have a future, and a bunch of people without hope or motivation won't try and even prepare for survival.
Don't forget your recreational drugs! 😉👍🍄
I'll drink to that.
Modern politics be like:
let put us in equal danger with none of the information!
This is one of those analogue horror things I watch markiplier play Lmao but real
The first 15 minutes i was thinking "i don't have a basement", but then it said what to do, i was like "oh ok. Wait i live in england"
Time for preparation is actually now, check back and see if my comment is here 5 years later
So does that mean Chernobyl is ok? it's been more than a couple weeks.
That's a different type of radiation and contamination
@@CD3WD-Project oh
Areas around the plant are getting better, but the Russian troops fucked themselves over pretty hard when they dug trenches in contaminated soil and lived in them for a while. Oops.
Wait, your telling me you can still get radio messages through a bunker, but radiation from a nuclear blast can't get through? I'm genuinely curious
Lower wavelengths (i.e radio) pierce material easier than higher wavelengths (i.e Gamma Ray, X-ray)
It's how we don't see through walls but heat cameras can and so does your phone's antenna
@@tomikun8057 cool, thanks!
I thought radiation stayed longer than a week. Is fallout radiation different from radiation from, say, nuclear energy waste or chemical facilities? Idk much about radiation.
12:39 The "h" in "where" seemed to be actually pronounced at that time, that's an interesting example of linguistic evolution.
I have had an university teacher from the US who has it a little bit. And he isn't very old.
@@amadeosendiulo2137 I know it is still pronounced in many rural areas, and perhaps in scotland and ireland, but at that time it seemed quite more common even in urban areas.
its funny since i pronounce the h too.
and i come from B I R M I N G H A M (the british one.)
Very similar to “11 Steps to Survival” from Canada. Probably same animators and borrowed certain parts from it.
Very heavily borrowed from _11 Steps to Survival_ produced several years before, this was a co-production of Canadian and American civil defense agencies.
Yep the NFB is credited at the end and a lot of the same scenes from 11 Steps to Survival are present.
You can tell this and 11 Steps was like a B-team NFB project from the quality but they still cared.
@@KingThrillgore 11 Steps predates this film by several years. Some cleaning up of the animation may have been completed, but some of the text titles used in 11 Steps were actually less generic (Protection looks like someone went nuts with Letraset.)
By the time MAD as a docrine became entrenched, most of the knowledge we had surrounding preparedness measures had done the same. When _Protect and Survive_ was leaked in 1980, the information had not changed significantly from what had been available over twenty years before in the UK. What had changed, however, was the sentiment among many ordinary citizens towards government motives for providing such information in the first place.
It is funny how we are knocking the dust off of these informative films .
5:35 “I looked at the trap, Ray.”
I don’t know why but I thought this was an analog horror thing. But anyway, now I know what makes me special.
If I may ask, can you please elaborate on what exactly made you special?
@Pom Tubes it's a joke about fallout games
@@pomtubes1205 the skill selection
@@cnbviper007 shit. Am i a boomer?
@Pom Tubes Following total atomic annihilation, the rebuilding of this great nation of ours may fall to you. Thats why we at Vault-Tec have prepared these educational materials for you to better understand the 7 defining attributes that make you S.P.E.C.I.A.L.
Today we will focus on strength. In the wasteland essential supplies will be scarce. When an item of value is found keep it close and away from bullies. The stronger you are the more you can carry. Be sure to know your limits or you may find it challenging to escape from hazardous scenarios no matter how strong you are. There are other situations where you may find yourself in close proximity to unfriendly neighbors. For such cases you must learn to defend yourself using your natural strength. Use anything sharp or sturdy enough to swing. Get creative with your implement, but stay reasonable and look for anything that can further enhance you innate vigor. The greater your strength the greater the impact but remember, some moments require more than muscle.
In this chapter we will focus on perception. It is the unfortunate truth that when you go above ground you will be faced with many post nuclear nuisances. These frightening menaces will come in all different shapes and sizes and pose an immediate threat to your survival. You must learn to deal with these dangers but may find this challenging at first. Thats why we’ve provided you with the Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System so you can scan the threat and pinpoint areas of weakness, and the higher your perception the more accurate you will be. Well you’ll put Davey Crocket to shame. There may be times where you must engage in questionable activities ahem. Your perception can help keep you safe during these morally ambiguous moments. Practice your pilfering on youths, the elderly, or the incapacitated. As you continue to purloin your way to success try more challenging targets, and more skillful techniques for greater returns. Don’t get to cocky there sport.
Our topic today is endurance. We will all be faced with many new and unfamiliar health risk, such as infection, sudden loss of limb, and above all harmful radiation. Fortunately your formidable endurance has turned your body into a hard working machine that can resist the harmful affects of radiation and physical violence. Like any machine then your body must be well maintained to stay in tip top shape. While average Joe’s will survive on old packaged standby’s your ironclad insides will allow you to seek fresh meat. Radiation poisoning may have enlarged your favorite meals. This means more helpful nutrition for you. Take caution not to bite off more than you can chew. Endurance can also provide new options for food, some of which can be an acquired taste. Gone are the days of exercising for fun. Instead you will need to combine athletics with crucial survival activities. The greater your endurance the further you can go. Just be certain to be mindful of others.
And now charisma, what is it made of? Unlike the clean, wholesome America you may recall the wasteland will be a distrustful place full of unsavory characters and a few morals. Earning the trust of your fellow man is an often overlooked key to survival. One way to prove your trustworthiness is through fair commercial exchange. Your renowned charisma will enable more favorable bartering. Don’t get greedy now. Use your charismatic nature to negotiate your way out if tense moments. Having friends is always if value. How else do I find friends you may wonder. You may find an impromptu cocktail hour helps to ease social stress. Your charisma will help you avoid the paroles of addiction, but not the immediate affects of drink, so practice moderation or you’ll find out who your real friends are the hard way. You will find that even wild animals can be charmed by your charisma. Looks like you’ve found a new pal. Oh ho, don’t get carried away there bug fella.
Our next area of attention is intelligence. With all the talk of physical survival in the wasteland, you may forget that sometimes its survival of the smartest. An empty mind is a vessel for knowledge and intelligence is the key to unlocking opportunity and adapting to your new world above ground. Your advanced know how will grant you access to new places and new technologies. Space age isn’t it? Intelligent survivors are also more inventive, creating technological wonders of their own. Note that the “s” in science stands for safety, and when the tables are turned against you don’t be afraid to set aside your refined intelligence for the raw instincts of survival. Just don’t lose your head.
Now lets discuss the uses of agility. A nuclear blast and the subsequent fallout will have many adverse effects on life as we know it. Intensive prolonged radiation exposure may transform those above ground into decrepit rotting beings that have lost their ability to reason. They will likely be without common manners and quick to anger. You must learn to make the most of available firearms, but enthusiasm will only take you so far. Now lets try that again, and remember that with your impressive agility you can act more decisively in V.A.T.S. See? Its a snap. Agility can also help you out in difficult moments, but why place yourself under unducped stress? Instead try a subtler route. Taking the quieter approach is always worth consideration. Your agility can turn a sneak attack into a complete tactical move. Keep in mind others may have the same bright idea.
Got your rabbits foot? Good, Its time we talk about luck. The difference between whether you live or die in the post nuclear world may depend on the flip of a coin. Luck is a mysterious source of curiosity. See here? A well placed shot may not always do the trick. If Lady Luck favors you though, you’ll find those critical moments a breeze. What’s this? Only scrounging up duds? Time and patience may net you a suitable collection, but with luck on your side you’re bound to find some swell keepers. No no, hold on to anything shiny. It may be of hidden value. Be careful not to get distracted by your new found fortunes. Uh oh, that wasn’t the only test. It looks like luck has helped you once again, unfortunately she can’t save you from every situation. At least your misfortune can become someone else’s fortune.
Keep doing your push ups and chin ups because there’s more strength can do for you. Always look to sharpen your 5 senses, for perception doesn’t stop there. Build your endurance and soon you will find ways that it improves your life above ground. Though you see, picking the charismatic approach is more than just good manners. Advanced learning in the field of intelligence can offer even more benefits in this modern age of wonders. Your agility will help you move through the wasteland with ease and yield other benefits. Luck may be fickle but if you can wu her to your side the possibilities are endless. Swing for the fences like the pro- crafting specialized protective gear to keep- or building clever weapons to wield in keenly assessing the unfriendly locals and terrain- handling sensitive munitions with- and building a long distance relationship- added confidence in the swimming pool- stronger more resilient limbs to keep- flesh of your fellow man can provide- working with mans best friend is- means more loyal companions will- convincing others to act on your behalf and- start navigating with technological ease- keep blood were it belongs by healing- in creating more potent chemical compounds from- assaulting an unsuspecting dreamer for the- in hastily reloading your firearm to-, replying on damage to additional targets when the- a particularly bloody mess will- a chance to build a streak of destruction that- the magic of the unexpected all- regularly study your Vault-Tech provided materials to prepare for survival, and to answer the question: do you know what makes you S.P.E.C.I.A.L?
Basements are always a must. Wait at least two weeks after initial blast. Thankfully fallout has a short lifespan.
This may be old, but all the information is accurate and true
I grew up from the 60s to the 80s, the height of the Cold War. My generation (X) had very pragmatic views on nuclear Armageddon - if it happened, it happened, there really wasn’t much we could do about it. Our anxiety was mostly caused by the secretive and paranoid nature of every Soviet commie leader until Gorbachev became General Secretary of the USSR.
The best years this country ever had in the 20th century were from 1989 to 2000 - the Berlin Wall came down, communism in Eastern Europe crashed under the weight of its own cruelty, and then on Christmas Day 1991 the USSR just up and disappeared. For just over a decade the American people (and everyone else) could all breathe again, we had escaped the nuclear Sword of Damocles that JFK had warned the world about. This country really hasn’t been the same since 9/11 - we’ve changed as a people, and not for the better.
You're absolutely right I appear to be a little younger than you I grew up in the '70s to '90s and our best years are definitely behind us in this country.
I also believe you're accurate on your assumption that the turning point was 9/11 although I do think it has drastically accelerated in the past few years. There's not a day that goes by that I don't think about the '90s for the most part and I worry quite a bit about the direction of everything. And really bothers me because I have two kids who are yet 18 and I worry what they are going to have to go through for the rest of their life.
God, the music silently spooks the hell out of me.
in the panic not even 1% will follow this rules
Okay. One long blast, hurricane. Nuclear bomb, either a wavering sound, short toots from a whistle, the sound of a horn, or any other alarm doing what it does. Got it!
6:00 a blue stick figure crouching in a ditch
Here to mark that I'm here until this blow up idk.
I still remember during my day in the draft(months ago btw), they gave us a paper about the milltary ritual things and on the back side of it has one section talk about how to deal with nuke step by step, my first thought was that is funny.
I kinda find this entire Film really sad radiation comes a horn blasts familys take shelter idk somrtimes i just cry for no Reisen in Videos of photos yoir Not supposed to cry about LISTEN IM JUST A VERY EMOTIONAL PERSON!
What should I do if I get blinded by the multiple flashes, vaporised by the heat, chopped into a thousand pieces by flying debris, have my ears & lungs blasted apart by the shockwaves, become irradiated into a soup by the many, many fallout storms, & lose my marbles through 6 months of living in shoebox under the endless rubble, dead body parts, & deceased loved ones all over the shop? I live in the country's second city, so we can expect at least a thousand 100Kt, to 3Mt surface & air blasts to contend with.
Party on dude😄👍
what doesn't kill you makes you stronger
As long as you have a gallon of water and some canned goods, you'll be fine.
At least a thousand blasts?
uhhh have you tried tylenol?
I feel disstresed
Im so proud how fast your channel is growing and how so many people relate to you. Sending love!
Thank you so much!!
after 2 days, 99% of radiaiton is gone
I can''t help laughing
Tbh this is quite true, radiation decresases on a logarithmic scale, decreasing very fast at first but very slowly afterwards. The 1% left takes decades to decay.
But if the 1% left is already enough to be dangerous, just imagine what the "100%" means.
It really depends on if it is an Air or Land Blast. If it goes off high up most of the radiation is gone after a few days, If it goes off on land then it will stick around for years.
It comes from so called 7-10 rule obeying t^-1,2 function. Every 7-fold increase in time causes roughly 10-fold decrease in radiation level. When it's related to the situation 1 hour after the explosion, we've got the radiation level decreased 10 times after 7 hours and 100 times (99% gone) after 49 hours ≈2 days.
bullshite@
@@peterphilstacey4698 one of the comments above details quite well how that works.
Sounds like there's a hidden audio channel being played with another voice, you can hear it well around 21:40. I wonder what that is. A different channel for another language? Intrusive sound in the studio?
I will simply cook a pizza using the explosion.
Radioactive pizza will turn you into a ninja turtle
if it takes 2 weeks for fallout to be gone then why after 200 years fallout 3 still looks like first day of nuclear blast? check and mate bethesda bots
because the radiation is gone but the effects persist. Aint nobody gonna rabuild when you got dose cokroaches
and some radiation persists even tho fallout has stopped falling it is stil on the ground and will remain radioactive for thousands of years
the eas would do that now a days, our warning device is the cell phone in our pocket, they will text a warning message to our phones, sirens only were made to warn people outdoors
LoL players: ez win 100 years without sunlight
The fact that this video is necessary is terrifying
nice
I don’t know why I’m getting recommended to this for some reason. How..
Bro made a show about Ohio 💀
12:38 YEAH RIGHT! You're on your own...every man for himself.
I almost fell asleep to this lol. Very interesting to see though.
I am waiting for it, So i can use my phosphine gas
i clicked on this split between whether this was analog horror or actual history, considering the channel name. ive yet to verify but the description tells me that its the latter...
I work as a C.O. in a prison, about 15 miles from a major city. If the city is hit by a nuclear attack, I have no idea what I'm supposed to do.
1: don't get caught in the flash
2: how can you be 15 miles from a major city and *not* be in that city? IG if you live on a state border, or across a 15 mile wide river... Nukemap says China's current ICBM's will kill you if you're in the flash, so get as far away from any windows as you can IG...
3: just leave the city lmao
It’s Phoenix Arizona, once you leave the city, it’s open desert.
3:22 Thunderbolt siren :D
War. War Never Changes.
WAR HAS CHANGED
@@thisismyfcukingemail I see you've never played Fallout.
The Romans conquered all of the Mediterranean for sheer power, Spain built an Empire from it’s lust for gold, Hitler rose a Crippled Germany from Economic ruin, and war, war never changes
It's the American/Canadian version of "Protect and Survive!"
I play Fallout 4 and Fallout NV, none of this is true, all you need to do is take some stompacks and some Rad-X and you're good!
Fallout series' fallout is much different than real fallout. The radiation remains for hundreds of years and mutates creatures in fallout. None of that really happens irl (other than the radiation, MAYBE.)
What am I gonna do duck and cover?
for a second there I thought this was one of those analog horror channels
I am feeling like in fallout
Japan got nuked twice and it wasn’t the end of the world for Japan. America in particularly is a vastly larger country. Nobody’s acting like it’s a “minor inconvenience”. That’s just you being the exact opposite, overly fearful as if there’ll be no hope so there’s no point even trying. This is educational on what you should at least know if a nuke is hitting near your location. The people outside the direct blast radius where buildings are still standing can obviously survive if they’re informed on what to do.
The bombs in Japan were toys compared to the later Hydrogen bombs . The primer that detonates little boy was conventional gun powder. The detonating primer to set off a hydrogen is an atomic bomb explosion.
@@casualcadaver I'm pretty sure the bigger deal is the fact if we had a nuclear war, more than just 2 nukes would be used. They could destroy a larger area by just dropping more nukes over it.
The primary targets are still going to be where most people are packed together, which is cities.
Also a nuclear war becomes more about the size of your territory. It obviously wouldn't be a fair fight between Japan and America, since America wouldn't need as many nukes as Japan would.
But i'm pretty sure if 2 large countries were nuking each other, they'd at least be able to do as much damage as each other, and so the leaders would have a truce.
Also that's the reason America didn't nuke Tokyo. Because without any leadership left, they probably wouldn't come to a sensible surender.
3:05 me when I see two of them
is this analog horror? i have too low of an attention span to find out myself.
Not really
Revisiting this, the appended black-&-white film at 23:39 could use its audio. Is there another copy of it somewhere?
Great Video!
Thanks for the visit
This makes me remember that Analog series, that had almost this segment at 5:06, its probably from 2022
The Soviets had 45,000 nuclear missiles. The U.S. 11,000. How healthy do you think the planet would be after 56,000 nuclear detonations with one 90-minute period?
Funny after 2020 they don't talk much about the Doomsday Clock like they did constantly after 2016
what
Strong hope we find milk soon
The voiceover sounds like a young(er) William Daniels, a.k.a. Dr. Craig on "St Elsewhere," and KITT on "Knight Rider." 😮
99% ?...for what? Surviving hell? Oh let me make sure I'll have enough supplies for a barbecue that weekend
Very spooky at times, I find myself really feeling for the blue guys, the one hiding in a ditch waiting to die was pretty evocative, also Guy Talking On Radio's gotta be my fav new Guy
Robinson Elizabeth Brown Brian Robinson David
Is this set in the 1960s or 80s?
What decade is this video is made in
If your talking about "On the Beach", it was the 60's . . .
This is useful for britain if the kahoona comes due to putin or xi il know what to do to survive the fallout.