Morphic Resonance; The Theory of Formative Causation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Rupert Sheldrake Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation
    www.amazon.com...
    Peter Gorman Sapo In My Soul: The Matsés Frog Medicine
    www.amazon.com...
    The Force of Habit: New Tests for Morphic Resonance
    • The Force of Habit: Ne...
    Two-headed worms that never die | Michael Levin and Lex Fridman
    • Two-headed worms that ...
    Using bioelectricity to study how cells make collective decisions about growth and shape
    wyss.harvard.e...
    Dean Radin short list of peer-reviewed journal articles and books about psi phenomena
    www.deanradin....
    Parapsychology: Psi and Science
    www.psychology...
    Bryan J. Williams Revisiting the Ganzfeld ESP Debate: A Basic Review and Assessment
    www.dropbox.co...
    Dean Radin Event-Related Electroencephalographic Correlations Between Isolated Human Subjects
    www.dropbox.co...
    Electroencephalographic Evidence of Correlated Event-Related Signals Between the Brains of Spatially and Sensory Isolated Human Subjects
    www.dropbox.co...
    Rupert Sheldrake Experimental Tests For Telephone Telepathy
    www.sheldrake....
    New Tests For Morphic Resonance
    www.sheldrake....
    Are Melting Points Constant? Rupert Sheldrake
    cdn.centerfori...
    Science and Psychic Phenomena: The Fall of the House of Skeptics
    www.amazon.com...
    Alfred North Whitehead: Process and Reality
    www.amazon.com...
    Matter and Memory Henri Bergson
    / 865540.matter_and_memory
    Henri Bergson Relationship with Psi Research
    psi-encycloped...
    ‪@RupertSheldrakePhD‬
    00:45 📚 Reintroduction
    02:07 🌌 Morphic resonance
    03:02 🎥 Overview
    04:07 🧬 Rupert Sheldrake's background
    09:04 🔄 Beyond DNA
    13:12 🧬 Neo-Darwinian synthesis
    17:35 🔋 bioelectric fields
    30:00 🔄 purposeful self-organization
    30:44 🧬 Two-headed planarians
    32:07 🦠 Punctuated Equilibrium
    33:04 🌱 Evolution and collective consciousness
    33:56 🔬 Michael Levin's research
    35:06 🌐 Morphogenetic fields are non-local
    35:49 🔄 Self-resonance
    37:01 🔗 horizontal and vertical resonance.
    37:42 🎶 sympathetic resonance and multi-dimensional similarity.
    41:03 🌀 influencing probabilities and reducing indeterminacies
    43:34 🐀 McDougall's rat experiments
    48:11 🐭 Morphic resonance explains faster learning
    49:37 🔬 Molecular and astronomical resonance
    55:22 ❄️ Synthetic crystals
    59:46 🔬 Chemical compounds
    01:00:27 📉 Predicting chemical compound properties
    01:02:02 🧬 The protein folding problem
    01:05:31 🧩 Mechanistic reductionism
    01:07:33 🛠️ The machine metaphor
    01:10:31 🌿 formative causation
    01:17:45 🧠 free will, agency and subjectivity
    01:22:31 📚 Introduction to process philosophy
    01:25:38 🌟 self-generating processes.
    01:27:41 🌱 The world is fundamentally alive
    01:28:06 🔄 Indeterminacy is self-determinacy
    01:30:16 🧩 Nested Hierarchies
    01:31:36 🔗 Hybrid prehensions
    01:32:19 🌌 Past and future
    01:39:26 🐀 Lashley's experiments
    01:46:17 🧠 Memory is a fundamental aspect of nature
    01:50:46 🌀 telepathy and out-of-body experiences
    01:56:44 🧠 Extrasensory influences
    01:58:38 🔍 Sheldrake's experiments
    02:07:50 📊 Parapsychological studies
    02:14:43 🌟 Carl Jung and the collective unconscious
    02:16:07 🧠 Memory is fundamental
    02:19:26 🌿 Anthropological phenomena
    02:24:07 🏛️ Religious rituals and architecture
    02:29:09 🌙 Precognitive experiences and dreams
    02:31:13 🌌 Morphogenetic cosmology

КОМЕНТАРІ • 407

  • @AltarToRememberance
    @AltarToRememberance 8 місяців тому +265

    WE MAKIN IT OUTTA THE MACHINE MODEL OF THE ORGANISM WITH THIS ONE 🗣 🗣 🗣 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +27

      😎👉👉

    • @WonderstoneTraining
      @WonderstoneTraining 7 місяців тому +4

      No cap, fam

    • @nopressure6986
      @nopressure6986 7 місяців тому +4

      I have to concentrate to understand every other word this man is saying, like I don’t know English, and this is how the comments look. This channel is great 😂

    • @WonderstoneTraining
      @WonderstoneTraining 7 місяців тому

      @@nopressure6986😸

    • @tristonthomasmusic
      @tristonthomasmusic 6 місяців тому +3

      Bruh your so funny for bringing a meme to the deepest philosophical dialogue we making it out the eternal abyss with this one lol

  • @PILLOWKVLT
    @PILLOWKVLT 8 місяців тому +9

    I understand wanting to be the bigger person, but I still think you should respond to Dave. The ideas you promote on this channel are worth advocating for. Your content doesn't deserve to be lumped in with flat earth and young earth creationism.

  • @davieboy3814
    @davieboy3814 6 місяців тому +3

    Amazing work!

  • @mettattem
    @mettattem 8 місяців тому +4

    Well well… that was absolutely incredible! Just finished this in a single sitting. Going to likely repeat this process later

  • @alexzapf8212
    @alexzapf8212 7 місяців тому +1

    This idea gives a different feeling to 'making history'

  • @nuclearcrocodilia8475
    @nuclearcrocodilia8475 7 місяців тому +1

    Man I was having a conversation with my friend about living systems a few months ago and they said that they thought that I was the only one that looked at the world that way

  • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
    @ChaoticNeutralMatt 7 місяців тому

    So I wanted to pass on, that I think some of these deeper elements are finally being digested. Something that came to mind is an easy association with trauma and samskaras

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt 6 місяців тому

      I think the framework you are outlining is fairly solid. I likely still miss some of the nuances you've presented here, but I find that I've come to a similar understanding to the one you pose here. I am biased, but I think it is reasonable to grapple with.

  • @OverKill515
    @OverKill515 8 місяців тому +1

    Fantastic information here, thank you!

  • @thoughtstratum
    @thoughtstratum 8 місяців тому +1

    I assumed something similar with dogs. Inherited memory. A "life in the blood experiences of their progenitors". What do they dream of? There were instances the instruction "sit" yielded success without any prior demonstration in pups. Even the countenance of the owner and the emotional experiences of the dogs shaped the next generations skull shape, facial features, maximum adult growth, coat color, behaviors and tendency to disease. Interestingly while they may not exude identity in the human sense, their rudimentary personalities followed certain archetypal patterns of behavior based on the time of year they were birthed. Of course I'd have to breed and study hundreds in depth to know definitely that correlation exists in full, though the little I've seen holds some substance. One dog born in April in the Ram's sign was particularly hot blooded (including physically), adrenal, high in libido and thereby aggressive. Not one to be subdued easily, the little time I had her earned me my fair share of minor scars. A born hunter. Arguably the templates patterning form and persona may emanate and take on physical roots, through cyclic configurations in earthly nature, the planets and stars (all in their subtle or "soul" aspects and archetypes). My gut and faith say yes

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +1

      There's alot of things about the evolution of dog breeds which I think we can't simply explain as neo-darwinian "artificial selection". There's more going on there that is much stranger than most scientists realize.

    • @toppedtop5787
      @toppedtop5787 8 місяців тому

      ​​​@@Formscapes whats your view of abiogeness?
      And ive been trying to watch more of your content, im not and athiest im agnostic, but alot of your content seems to have some kind of theism or diesm in this.
      So my question is as we are moving forward and the paradigm shifts will it be to a god beliving one, and even then what god the traditional abrahamic conception orr???
      So then will things as creationism be a popular theory or??
      Like i suppose im just confused im 17 im studying to later go on to university(for physics, or natural sciences if i get into cambridge) and that science video not gonna lie broke my brain.
      Im particular worried about the socail effects from like a revision of the legitimacy of homosexaulity like Michael Levin's 'Why Homosexuality Abnormal'

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому

      @@toppedtop5787 One thing worth keeping in mind here is that when people talk about the "traditional" understanding of God, they are actually referring to the deistic "clockmaker" God, which is itself a very recent invention. The ancients and medievals certainly didn't see it that way, and neither do I, but ultimately I think that atheistic materialism is fundamentally just enlightenment deism wearing a different hat. The word "God" is discarded and re-branded as "the laws of nature", but all of the essential properties remain the same; the laws of nature are eternal, uncreated, invariant, omnipotent and omnipresent - and thus serve the exact same ideological and theological functions.

    • @toppedtop5787
      @toppedtop5787 8 місяців тому

      @@Formscapes ah i see could you provide me a resource on the clock maker god being a recent thing. And im from daves channel and i would like again to just apologise he is just rude i find it a unhelpful stratedgy that just plays into mainstream apologetics of the arrogant athiest.
      Also would god still be necessary? And like hell, and the eternal punishment the seperating it simply doesnt seem to make sense outside the very strict watchmaker.

  • @bryanalltogether
    @bryanalltogether 8 місяців тому

    Where can I find more about synthetic molecules and the increase in melting point?

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому

      Sheldrake talks about it in his book and there's a link in the description to an exchange between Sheldrake and some chemists arguing about the topic. The critics agree that the measured melting points have changed, but argue that it must be due to impurities because they believe melting points can't actually change.

  • @Muuccss
    @Muuccss 7 місяців тому +1

    Terrance McKenna was always right

  • @newprodjek514
    @newprodjek514 8 місяців тому +4

    1rst!

  • @saraharnold3534
    @saraharnold3534 8 місяців тому +184

    Idk who this man is, but hearing someone else express the same exact concepts that I can't stop thinking, dreaming, meditating about, and articulate them so beautifully, makes me feel less alone. We out here 🌀

    • @nikkukohan522
      @nikkukohan522 8 місяців тому +9

      Same. Proud to be part of this collective consciousness, I guess

    • @marcus8710
      @marcus8710 8 місяців тому +8

      Indeed. Hello all.

    • @keix
      @keix 8 місяців тому +4

      💯💯💯💯

    • @doricscotty
      @doricscotty 8 місяців тому +2

      Lol thinking, dreaming and meditating is as far as this guys scientific knowledge extends. I would swear this guy is trolling you if I didn't know better!

    • @marcus8710
      @marcus8710 8 місяців тому +4

      A general grounding in the scientific patterns, which lead people to this line of research is necessary for understanding the research itself, as well as the interest of those who have been led to it from many simultaneous avenues

  • @FuelAirSparkTime
    @FuelAirSparkTime 8 місяців тому +36

    I think it's great you came back with a more refined and definitive reiteration on morphic resonance, not that your previous videos on it had any real flaws, it's just that you understand the significance of such an idea and know that your audience would certainly welcome such a revisiting.
    Your channel is one of the absolute best out there.

    • @AbsolDorogan
      @AbsolDorogan 7 місяців тому +1

      Learning how to manipulate bioelectric fields would be great, as long as no one ends up with two heads.

  • @martin.ballard
    @martin.ballard 3 місяці тому +10

    Dr. Sheldrake is a hero of mine not just for his pioneering work, but for being such a benevolent (and unbaitable) presence. 'Pseudo-science' my ass. Many thanks for this.

  • @childofkhem1.618
    @childofkhem1.618 3 місяці тому +7

    I love how you use cymatic images with/and bilatetal symmetry. It's beautiful and shows one of the most important concept in metaphysics, that nature is fractle and is always seeking balance. It's like a visual interpretation of hermeticism.

  • @anthonydavinci7985
    @anthonydavinci7985 6 місяців тому +14

    Excellent compilation, analyses, presentation. 80 years of combined experimentation and study in TWO HOURS !

  • @monstro.invisivel
    @monstro.invisivel 8 місяців тому +41

    Friend, I have been following you since your second video... I am very happy to see the direction that your teachings have taken me. I am grateful for your existence and your ability to transmit information. Everything I learn from you, I share with as many people as possible. Hugs from Brazil.

    • @jbasfilhful
      @jbasfilhful 8 місяців тому

      Excelente conteúdo. Pena que nossa nação careça do inglês.Abs

  • @Woodfiend
    @Woodfiend 3 місяці тому +7

    The longer you study this school of thought, the more you start to see EVERYTHING you look at as an outward expression of some underlying kernel of law.

  • @ComeauYT
    @ComeauYT 8 місяців тому +16

    I really appreciate you not dropping into the gutter for youtube mud wrestling (my favorite hobby)
    It really shows you actually care about expanding the topic instead of being the "smart guy" that you HAVE to listen to. You've done 6 hrs of solid content that deserves to be whatever you want

  • @Formscapes
    @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +103

    Things!;
    Thing 1; yeah I know this one really needs time-stamps. I'll get em done asap
    Thing 2; No I will not be responding to the grown man throwing a temper tantrum video lol
    [ok, ok, I ended up making a response video anyway. areyounotentertained.jpg]
    Thing 3; I may have forgotten to include some citations in the video description so if you don't see something, lemme know

    • @2013Arcturus
      @2013Arcturus 8 місяців тому +11

      Made a comment regarding angry science man, then saw this, and deleted it lmao
      Great video! I was hoping for a deeper dive into Morphic resonance, this is awesome, keep up the great content!

    • @pi4313
      @pi4313 8 місяців тому +20

      He's not throwing a temper tantrum. And even if he is, he made a lot of good points. If you are talking about his voice, that is his natural voice. If you are talking about his insults, they are well deserved. You tried to take a shit on an entire half century of human progress on the argument equivalent of a foundation of sand. If you choose not to respond to the guy with 70x as many subs as you do, that's your loss. Your reputation will take the consequences.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +60

      @@pi4313 I chose who I engage with on the basis of maturity and intelligence, not subscriber count

    • @kungfumoosegaming7269
      @kungfumoosegaming7269 8 місяців тому +13

      This is the best response to it. That's really the vibe I got from it, he was totally angry, childish, and, ironically, a perfect example of the exact reason science has become so dogmatic

    • @aapocalypseArisen
      @aapocalypseArisen 8 місяців тому

      @@pi4313 "pr0gress" l0l we barely kn0w anything c0ncrete and a l0t 0f the the0ries we d0 w0rk with are inc0mplete 0r m0st likely lacking details we just cant disc0ver with 0ur current capacities
      asking questi0ns and being critical 0f things is h0w we as a species have actually made pr0gress at all
      being a sych0phant f0r a high sch00l teacher with barely a degree wh0 pr0selytizes scientific realism just pr0ves the p0int that "science" has m0ved 0n fr0m explaining reality and has turned 0ver int0 a new religi0us traditi0n
      i may n0t agree with everything in this new wave 0f metam0dern spiritualist science but it makes me questi0n and seek answers m0re than reiterating the same 0ld the0ries that are running y0ur sweet "pr0gress" int0 the dirt
      physics is running in circles and even bi0l0gy is w0rking with the 0utdated darwinistic m0del still because t0 suggest 0therwise is literally called 0ut as heresy
      science needs new minds and new ideas t0 m0ve f0rward
      im glad at least s0me0ne is trying t0 ask valid and intriguing questi0ns because it means we still have new fr0ntiers t0 f0rward and h0pefully we can break this deadl0ck and achieve enlightenment

  • @Insert_creative_unused_name
    @Insert_creative_unused_name 8 місяців тому +15

    Haven't watched the vid yet, but I bet it will be quite the intellectual rollercoaster if I'm judging form your previous videos. I often have trouble understanding the complex wording used to describe ideas, but even with those limitations, I still manage to learn quite a bit. I first found your channel through the "magic is real" video.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +6

      That's what I do 😎

    • @Insert_creative_unused_name
      @Insert_creative_unused_name 8 місяців тому +4

      Thx for the reply. I notice that I usually end up having to watch the video twice over to fully re-remember the ideas in the video@@Formscapes

  • @munkeeboi1982
    @munkeeboi1982 8 місяців тому +14

    Amazing. Although maybe completely unrelated, it reminds me of a first aid course I did where it was stated that if someone were to unfortunately spill their guts then one could clean them up and reinsert them in a random fashion. The guts would then heal and sort itself out back to its initial location as if it were its own entity.

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt 7 місяців тому

      I don't imagine that's completely unrelated

    • @munkeeboi1982
      @munkeeboi1982 7 місяців тому

      @@ChaoticNeutralMatt It's definitely all relative to a fault! ;)

    • @annar2721
      @annar2721 4 місяці тому

      No, that's just because of how the guts are attached to the body - they are always able to freely move around inside the tummy, the gut "tubes" only anchored to the inside of the body by a sheath of tissue that wraps around the tubes. Not that I disagree with Sheldrake's theory, just don't think the guts example is good evidence one for it

  • @Justineyedia
    @Justineyedia 8 місяців тому +11

    The hypothesis of formative causation postulates that it depends on a kind of resonance, called morphic resonance. Morphic resonance takes place on the basis of similarity. The more similar an organism is to previous organisms, the greater their influence on it by morphic resonance. And the more such organisms there have been, the more powerful their cumulative influence. Thus a developing foxglove seedling, for example, is subject to morphic resonance from countless foxgloves that came before, and this resonance shapes and stabilizes its morphogenetic fields. (p. 120)

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +10

      One nuance of this worth highlighting though; If my whiteheadian interpretation of Morphic Resonance is correct, that implies that it actually isn't about similarity between the **physical** structure of organisms per se, but rather the mental structures ("conceptual prehensions") which **produce** those physical actualities. So, for example, this explains why no matter how many times you cut off rat's tails, you don't get rats naturally born with no tails, but you **can** get two-headed Planaria by "tricking" the Planaria tails into creating extra heads on their own.

    • @Justineyedia
      @Justineyedia 8 місяців тому +1

      @Formscapes epigenetics pops in my head. For some reason. Makes me questions epigenetics. Or epi eugenics.
      It looks like there's not much info available about epi eugenics, but here's some related information about epigenetics and eugenics.
      Epigenetics is the study of how cells control gene activity without changing the DNA sequence. The prefix "epi" means "on or above" in Greek.
      Epigenetics refers to external modifications to DNA that turn genes "on" or "off". These modifications do not change the DNA sequence, but instead, they affect how cells “read” genes.
      Epigenetics is thought to be the link between nature and nurture, where a person's experiences alters how their DNA is read by their cells.
      Eugenics is a prejudiced and incorrect understanding of Mendelian genetics that claimed abstract human qualities (e.g., intelligence and social behaviors) were inherited in a simple fashion.
      Epigenetic mechanisms have been linked to a wide variety of illnesses, behaviors, and other health indicators, including cancers of almost all types, cognitive dysfunction, and respiratory, cardiovascular, reproductive, autoimmune, and neurobehavioral illnesses.

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt 6 місяців тому

      I suspect at this point that there are two aspects or qualities. One could roughly be described as similarity, while the other would be an analog for creativity. The resonance, would be that which is part of the ongoing process and unfolding of experience, co-participatory.
      But yeah. That's just what struck me, take that as you will.

  • @Neceros
    @Neceros 4 дні тому +2

    🎯 Key points for quick navigation:
    00:45 *📚 Reintroduction to the theory of morphic resonance with a more refined approach.*
    02:07 *🌌 Morphic resonance viewed as a significant philosophical and metaphysical idea beyond fringe science.*
    03:02 *🎥 Overview of the video's content covering Sheldrake's theory development, related philosophies, bioelectric research, and implications.*
    04:07 *🧬 Rupert Sheldrake's background in biology and his path to developing morphic resonance theory.*
    08:10 *📖 Publication of Sheldrake's book establishing morphic resonance as a key theory in biology.*
    09:04 *🔄 Morphogenetic fields influence the development and behavior of organisms beyond DNA's role.*
    13:12 *🧬 Neo-Darwinian synthesis's dominance and its mechanistic view of heredity and evolution.*
    17:35 *🔋 Michael Levin's bioelectric field research on planarian regeneration supporting morphic resonance.*
    24:03 *🔬 Implications of morphic resonance for genetics, epigenetics, and evolutionary biology.*
    27:42 *⛰️ Discussion of punctuated equilibrium and critiques of gradualistic evolution within the context of morphic resonance.*
    30:00 *🔄 Evolution may involve purposeful self-organization, allowing large mutations to be viable.*
    30:44 *🧬 Two-headed planarians can survive and reproduce, suggesting self-organizing capabilities beyond genetic coding.*
    31:25 *🧠 Large mutations might be adapted purposefully by organisms through altering morphogenetic fields.*
    32:07 *🦠 Evolution may align with punctuated equilibrium, as empirical evidence supports sudden changes.*
    33:04 *🌱 Evolution might be driven by a collective consciousness rather than blind selection processes.*
    33:56 *🔬 Michael Levin's research supports a morphogenetic paradigm over a mechanistic one in developmental biology.*
    35:06 *🌐 Morphogenetic fields are non-local and influence each other across space and time, beyond electrical fields.*
    35:49 *🔄 Self-resonance allows organisms' morphic fields to be influenced by their own past states.*
    37:01 *🔗 Morphic fields influence individual organisms, creating horizontal and vertical resonance.*
    37:42 *🎶 Morphic resonance is akin to sympathetic resonance in physics, operating on multi-dimensional similarity.*
    41:03 *🌀 Morphic fields shape development by influencing probabilities and reducing indeterminacies in self-organizing systems.*
    43:34 *🐀 McDougle's rat experiments show faster learning across generations, supporting morphic resonance.*
    48:11 *🐭 Morphic resonance explains faster learning in both trained and untrained rat generations.*
    49:37 *🔬 Morphic resonance applies to all self-organizing systems, including molecular and astronomical structures.*
    55:22 *❄️ Synthetic crystals show increasing melting points over time, supporting morphic resonance theory.*
    59:46 *🔬 Chemical compounds form through atomic bonds influenced by electron orbital shells.*
    01:00:27 *📉 Predicting chemical compound properties based solely on atomic laws is often impossible.*
    01:02:02 *🧬 The protein folding problem remains unsolved despite extensive research.*
    01:02:58 *🤖 AlphaFold improved protein structure predictions but couldn't explain the underlying folding laws.*
    01:04:32 *🔄 Morphic resonance suggests protein structures emerge through evolutionary, not just atomic, processes.*
    01:05:31 *🧩 Mechanistic reductionism limits scientific understanding by assuming a purely deterministic world.*
    01:07:05 *🌐 Metaphysical paradigms like mechanistic materialism shape how scientific data is interpreted.*
    01:07:33 *🛠️ The machine metaphor in mechanistic materialism portrays the world as predictable and deterministic.*
    01:10:31 *🌿 Morphic resonance introduces formative causation, where self-organizing systems direct their own structure.*
    01:17:45 *🧠 Morphic resonance allows for free will by positing that whole systems can influence their parts.*
    01:21:07 *🌀 Morphic resonance implies agency and subjectivity exist throughout nature, even at atomic levels.*
    01:22:31 *📚 Introduction to process philosophy as an alternative metaphysical framework to mechanistic materialism.*
    01:23:13 *🧩 Alfred North Whitehead's process philosophy views the world as composed of self-generating events.*
    01:25:38 *🌟 Whitehead's philosophy aligns with morphic resonance by emphasizing organic and self-generating processes.*
    01:27:01 *🔗 Process philosophy rejects reductionism, seeing organisms and systems as inherently possessing agency.*
    01:27:41 *🌱 The world is fundamentally alive, characterized by self-determining processes rather than random mechanisms.*
    01:28:06 *🔄 Indeterminacy in nature is self-determined through conscious decisions, not purely random quantum events.*
    01:28:20 *🌟 Morphic resonance aligns with process philosophy, emphasizing organic and self-organizing development.*
    01:29:37 *🌐 Cosmos and organisms co-participate in generating harmonious forms of animacy through morphic fields.*
    01:30:16 *🧩 Morphic fields organize into nested hierarchies, creating complex structures of cognition and freedom.*
    01:31:36 *🔗 Hybrid prehensions allow morphic resonance to influence across space and time without physical proximity.*
    01:32:19 *🌌 Past events influence new events based on their proximity in morphological space, not physical space.*
    01:39:26 *🐀 Lashley's experiments show memories aren't localized in the brain, supporting morphic resonance theory.*
    01:46:17 *🧠 Memory is a fundamental aspect of nature, not just a function of the brain.*
    01:47:24 *🔁 Memories are recreated through morphic resonance rather than being stored physically.*
    01:50:46 *🌀 Morphic resonance suggests telepathy and out-of-body experiences are natural phenomena.*
    01:54:53 *🤨 Skeptics of parapsychology often use dishonest tactics like ad hominem attacks.*
    01:55:22 *💥 Skeptics dismiss evidence by assuming contrary beliefs without proper investigation.*
    01:56:04 *📖 "Science and Psychic Phenomena" by Chris Carter recommended for understanding Sai research history.*
    01:56:18 *🔄 The speaker shifted from skepticism to belief in Sai phenomena after philosophical insights.*
    01:56:44 *🧠 Extrasensory influences between minds may be common, aligning with morphic resonance theory.*
    01:57:13 *🌟 Influential thinkers like William James, Whitehead, Bergson, and Sheldrake support morphic resonance and Sai.*
    01:58:12 *🌌 Nature's complexity challenges rational presuppositions, suggesting morphic resonance as an alternative.*
    01:58:38 *🔍 Sheldrake's experiments aim to demonstrate extrasensory influences and telepathy.*
    01:59:05 *📞 Sheldrake's telepathy experiments showed participants guessed callers correctly more often than chance.*
    02:00:17 *📈 Results indicated higher correct guesses when participants knew the caller, supporting morphic resonance.*
    02:05:31 *🐶 Sheldrake's dog experiments found dogs waited longer for owners to return, potentially due to morphic resonance.*
    02:07:50 *📊 Parapsychological studies consistently show evidence supporting morphic resonance beyond chance.*
    02:08:31 *🧠 EEG experiments reveal non-local interactions between human minds beyond random chance.*
    02:11:06 *📈 A meta-study found Sai evidence comparable to established psychological phenomena.*
    02:12:13 *🧬 Morphic resonance provides a cohesive mechanism explaining Sai phenomena, integrating with other theories.*
    02:13:24 *🌌 Morphic resonance connects minds across space and time, shaping the present through past mental activities.*
    02:14:43 *🌟 Carl Jung's collective unconscious aligns with morphic resonance, suggesting shared archetypes.*
    02:16:07 *🧠 Memory is fundamental to nature itself, not just a brain function, supporting morphic resonance.*
    02:19:26 *🌿 Anthropological phenomena like shamanic rituals and induced visions may be explained by morphic resonance.*
    02:20:27 *🧩 Morphic resonance theory explains non-local interactions and synchronization between human minds.*
    02:21:08 *🐾 Gorman's Noo-noo vision accurately predicted the presence of wild boars, supporting morphic resonance.*
    02:21:35 *🌿 Noo-noo may dissociate mental processes from sensory inputs, enabling morphic resonance with the surrounding forest.*
    02:23:25 *🧠 Morphic resonance could explain telepathic interactions and synchronization between minds.*
    02:24:07 *🏛️ Religious rituals and architecture may facilitate morphic resonance by shaping mental processes.*
    02:25:01 *🍃 Set and setting influence the effects of mind-altering substances through morphic resonance.*
    02:25:27 *🦊 Morphic resonance allows humans to tune into animal experiences, aiding in hunting and tracking.*
    02:26:10 *📡 Whitehead's hybrid prehensions support the idea of non-local telepathic influences in morphic resonance.*
    02:29:09 *🌙 Precognitive experiences and dreams could be explained by morphic resonance.*
    02:31:13 *🌌 Morphic resonance challenges mechanistic materialism by revealing interconnected aspects of reality.*
    Made with HARPA AI

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  4 дні тому +1

      Well well well, if it isn't those timestamps I promised months ago and completely forgot about

  • @ca7582
    @ca7582 26 днів тому +3

    I absolutely love this channel. It might be the best essay channel EVER. You have a way of transmitting complex ideas from the starting point of the current paradigm, and then transporting us to new horizons... just amazing.
    I also love that you are an active philosopher, not just a divulgator. You actually postulate and express what you think and have been thinking about these topics, leaving it open and inviting us to keep mulling it over. I can't stress enough how great this channel is, 4 real.

  • @vaporchild1821
    @vaporchild1821 4 місяці тому +4

    this channel is an absolute goldmine thank you so much!!!!! my mind is expanding as i type this

  • @EllyCatfox
    @EllyCatfox 8 місяців тому +5

    Hey, I've been a fan for several months now and I'm curious if you've ever looked into the Qualia Research Institute (QRI), Orch OR theory of consciousness, Neural annealing, or the Subjective Experience Index? Just some people and things I thought might be adjacent to the things you've talked about here. 😸 💜

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +5

      I'm vaguely familiar with all of those, but not enough to discuss them in detail yet. Probably topics that will come up at some point when I do more videos on consciousness and philosophy of mind (topics which I'm probably never going to stop talking about lol)

  • @leocavalier
    @leocavalier 8 місяців тому +7

    I just want to say that I love your channel and have been working on a channel of my own(not to as much success as you) following similar perspectives of a self creating universe although from a more personal meaning and action based perspective. I hope that together alongside many other thinkers and channels like this we can awaken humanity towards a stronger foundation of meaning that overcomes the nihilistic perspective. I hope we will overlap more and one day communicate more with each other.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +2

      You had me at the Home-Resonance intro

    • @leocavalier
      @leocavalier 8 місяців тому +2

      @@Formscapes At least that was good for something(clearly not views). Anyway, I applaud you for your in-depth, perspective-shifting videos I look forward to hopefully some interaction or discussion of ideas in the future maybe when my channel is bigger and I understand the universe a little bit better. Godspeed!

  • @childofkhem1.618
    @childofkhem1.618 3 місяці тому +2

    On the formscape binge!!! Might need to go to detox but I'm not ready yet! This video was awesome and I'm getting to it while I read Robert temples book a new science of heaven, which has a ton of science to support this hypothesis. If this universe is fractle in nature than why would we assume that the earth doesn't have its own sort of neural network similar to berkland currents.

  • @keatonpriest
    @keatonpriest 8 місяців тому +13

    Timing couldn't be better!

  • @Cochrynn
    @Cochrynn 8 місяців тому +9

    Ope. Suddenly I have Saturday plans ❤❤❤

  • @TheGreenKnight500
    @TheGreenKnight500 8 місяців тому +5

    This reinforces my thinking that our animist ancestors were correct about a lot of things. Everything seems to have a spirit. Even inanimate objects can be said to have personalities of a sort. We already describe them as if they do without realizing it.

  • @rayberkemeier5758
    @rayberkemeier5758 8 місяців тому +24

    A phenomenal presentation that reaffirms my personal beliefs in collective consciousness. I have never thought of any occurrence as a coincidence and while remaining fairly quiet on many telepathic experiences, out off body occurances and recall of memories of occurances that I realize were not of my own experience all fit nicely into this theory of morphic resonance.
    Just as typing this, at the 2:14:00 mark you have just reached the realm of discussion into the collective conscious.
    Wow. you have explained what I have contemplated over since June 23, 1967 when I had my first encounter with what the average person would describe as psychological visions and experiences.

    • @128pResolution
      @128pResolution 8 місяців тому

      Redcedar laminate level of enlightenment. Only 13 more levels to reach

  • @yneleg
    @yneleg 8 місяців тому +5

    Do you make all the music yourself? I really like it, it combines perfect with the topics of the channel. Do you have any tips for producing music like that?

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +6

      I do indeed. It's not terribly complicated but there are a few tricks that I use for creating generative music which most people probably are not familiar with.
      I'll probably do a video at some point where I break down some the different techniques I use.

  • @Justineyedia
    @Justineyedia 8 місяців тому +4

    Jung’s idea of the collective unconscious did not make sense in the context of the mechanistic theory of life; consequently, it was not taken seriously within orthodox science. But it makes good sense in the light of formative causation. By morphic resonance, structures of thought and experience that were common to many people in the past contribute to morphic fields. These fields contain the average forms of previous experience defined in terms of probability. This idea corresponds to Jung’s conception of archetypes as “innate psychic structures.” (p. 307)
    It seems far more plausible for this collective unconscious to be maintained by fields than passed down through some kind of biological encoding in the brain. Do you see how beautiful and elegant this theory is?

  • @NotIT777
    @NotIT777 8 місяців тому +28

    That dave video was wild... almost seemed it was made out of fear? Anyone who is honest can sense the landscape shifting. The old crystallized way of knowing is quickly breaking, and those like yourself who are willing to question and follow ideas where they lead despite any " consensus " will be recognized in the near future. I know you're already aware, but just want to reaffirm that what you're doing is right on the money. Appreciate what you do and keep that Gnosis coming!

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +6

      😎👉👉

    • @user-lp7tx1fe6t
      @user-lp7tx1fe6t 8 місяців тому +1

      This channel is pathetic, full of people who like the idea of science and want to get into it but can’t be bothered to pick up a book, or solve differential equations, so you just build your own little echo chamber and pretend you’re all doing science lol

    • @128pResolution
      @128pResolution 8 місяців тому +2

      Dude you sound high as fuck based off of what you said. I swear it’s not that deep. This dude is just severely wrong in accusing general relativity of being wrong. It’s not dogma, we literally perform tests to confirm the physics behind what we’re taught.

    • @MycerDev-eb1xv
      @MycerDev-eb1xv 4 місяці тому +1

      @@128pResolutionGR is not necessarily right or wrong, it’s a predictable computational model of some aspects of reality, but is not entirely predictive or complete. No formal theory is wrong but can never be fully true or determinative by definition as per Gödel and Tarski. I add, if Formscapes asserts GR is definitively wrong, he is right in the sense it is not fully complete or predictive, but wrong in the sense that it is not experimentally viable.

  • @judysparx
    @judysparx 23 дні тому +2

    Brilliant and seamlessly direct✨ thank you! 🎯

  • @childofkhem1.618
    @childofkhem1.618 3 місяці тому +2

    This reminds me of the ancient Greek concept of ionic life. An information network that exists "above" or "below" (how ever u want to term, "outside") the time stream but is fundimentally made of, and shares, the same superfluid of potential charge we call the ether. Some may also call it the afterlife but I think that's an oversimplification.

  • @rochepienaar
    @rochepienaar 8 місяців тому +6

    Wow, Thank you so much for this. I can't believe the dexterity required to pull this off and you hit such great points and wrapped it around a pully for us to use further. What a noble!
    So basically, morphic resonance is important in order to obtain the memory and information available to all in the immortal existence that allows themselves to become aware so that they can influences the future of their choosing by having more on the buffet table of life to choose from.
    The collective consciousness is not sufficiently aware enough of other options and thus have determinedly chosen the past behaviour, because our society is untrained towards subtlety, as subtlety infringes upon our relationships, because the boundary lines become more transparent the more aware we become.
    Thus, shame and lower emotion that we have trained ourselves to suppress deny and regret aren't able to hide from the well trained perceiver, and so we avoid them and the things that they can teach out of fear of them affecting our relationships and status quo that are based on possession, slowly destroying our attachments and the stability that they have created to nurse the shock and fall of consciousness into a material vessel that feels separation and void (vacuum) and actually uses materialism to hide from god(awareness), because we afraid of people seeing us. (naked)
    Like Nietzsche said the philosopher is more afraid of being understood, as intimacy is frightening because others know you which means you have to take accountability and can't use ignorance as an excuse anymore. This ability to take responsibility creates the hierarchy and it's always based on how much truth you can work with.
    This is the basic understanding of what have learned from you so far.

  • @_spacegoat_
    @_spacegoat_ 8 місяців тому +5

    This keeps getting deeper and deeper....
    Well done, sir. You have firmly grasped my attention and peeled its eyelids back. I can't wait for more.

  • @WilcoxA
    @WilcoxA 8 місяців тому +8

    I get why you don't wanna do a response to Dishonest Dan, but man.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +12

      I mean he didn't even address any of the points I made so like... what am I gonna say? He showed his true colors all by himself and doesn't need my help making himself look like a manchild.

    • @NotIT777
      @NotIT777 8 місяців тому

      Who is this Dan? And twat did this dishonest man say?

    • @SPGHTTFRT
      @SPGHTTFRT 8 місяців тому +1

      Who is this person? When I tried searching dishonest Dan I don’t find anything that mentions formscapes

    • @danncarr08
      @danncarr08 8 місяців тому +4

      Professor Dave Explains did a video on Formscapes that came out yesterday.

    • @EllyCatfox
      @EllyCatfox 8 місяців тому

      Eww. I used to really like professor Dave's math videos but then I started getting into some of his other stuff and kept noticing a trend of him not really understanding the fluidity of humsn experience and often insulting other people and their ideas without understanding them. ​@@danncarr08

  • @bubble_nut5000
    @bubble_nut5000 8 місяців тому +7

    As always, thank you for your time and efforts you put into uploading your works. You always do a great job articulating your points. Great content, too.
    Have a great weekend brother.

  • @S.G.Wallner
    @S.G.Wallner 8 місяців тому +4

    #makebergsongreatagain

  • @1503010
    @1503010 Місяць тому +1

    Mind absolutely blown. What really drove it home for me was the story on Noo-Noo, as I’ve had a similar experience where a week after I smoked DMT part of the hallucinations manifested in reality. The details are trivial, but as it genuinely felt like I had already been then and there made me doubt my own sanity for a few weeks as it felt like my past consciousness had already tunneled ahead to that moment

  • @davidjones8043
    @davidjones8043 2 місяці тому +1

    The punctuated equilibrium segment reminds me of a video Suspicious Observers did that pointed at studies of animals rapidly changing during catastrophe cycles due to a weakening of the magnetic field and solar micro nova activity. Been a while since I watched it but he explained how this also over excites us mentally as well and it part of the reason that the world seems to be going insane, with more unstable individuals absolutely losing their minds for seemingly no reason at all lately.

  • @alfacarp
    @alfacarp 8 місяців тому +3

    I LOVE FORMSCAPES put that shit on a shirt 👕👕👕👕👕

  • @lilfr4nkie
    @lilfr4nkie 4 місяці тому +3

    *Revisitation*
    It really sucks how such a beautifully put together piece like this was overshadowed (at least largely in the comment section here) by that drama, this is one I will definitely be listening to repeatedly at work throughout the week.

  • @StephenDix
    @StephenDix 8 місяців тому +3

    Start Dark side of the Moon at 4:00. 🌜⏰

  • @achyuththouta6957
    @achyuththouta6957 8 місяців тому +2

    Not all scientific discoveries occured in western civilization and neither did advacements in philosophy. Its simply the most well preserved. That is all. I don't care much about giving importance to external world. Its the internal realm and awakening the inner consciousness that matters more. Promoting worldly desires isnt intelligent and never has been.

  • @driggerfireon5760
    @driggerfireon5760 15 днів тому +1

    I liked this already by the music choice in the first few minutes. I bet this is good work.

  • @plantstho6599
    @plantstho6599 8 місяців тому +4

    I have 3 of Bergson's books, but not enough time to read and digest them with all the other books I have in my queue. Plenty of other science and philosophy books in my stack and I've been reading for 40 years, but Bergson has to be the most divergent of them all. So I'm open to more vids describing his philosophy in more detail so I can validate that I'm picking up what he's putting down. I've seen other channels try to describe his work and it hasn't clicked for me yet... although I have books on energy healing which is, supposedly, related.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +8

      I'll probably do a full breakdown of his work at some point in the near future. His ideas are definitely worth taking seriously but I agree that most of the content about him on YT isn't terribly digestible.

    • @plantstho6599
      @plantstho6599 8 місяців тому +2

      @@Formscapes My guess is more visual aids would go a long way in helping people grasp his work. That's what all the other content seems to lack, as well as the books themselves.

    • @ca7582
      @ca7582 26 днів тому

      Hey mate, can you recommend any good books about energy healing? I have a sick dog and i wanna try everything (i know i sound crazy, but i don't care, i love my girl)

    • @plantstho6599
      @plantstho6599 26 днів тому

      @@ca7582 The skills take literal years to master. Not something you can just read and apply, even in a year. You have to literally devote your life to the path. What is your dog sick with?

  • @samanthabirdx
    @samanthabirdx 7 місяців тому +2

    something about the way you say
    🤖 morphogenetic 🤖 i always mimic it after i don’t know why

  • @jamesworley9888
    @jamesworley9888 8 місяців тому +2

    It's not that because we believe in a higher consciousness which we call God that we know we have a higher purpose it's the other way around. It's because we have a purpose of evolving not only biologically but also spiritually that God rather is part of the equation. Even if God gives us the purpose it's the purpose that leads to God NOT vice versa. Highly religious people and Atheists are both looking at everything upside down.
    That's one of the biggest and most superficial conclusions about Atheistic philosophy, they treat God as if it's a ''these dumber guys can't live without it thing''. Not taking it seriously as though it's a universal conclusion made by metaphysicians around the world, and that's also one of the biggest reasons that highly religious individuals suck so much at arguing for their case.
    Arguing for a higher consciousness as a fundamental cause for creation may be a sound argument in the grand scheme but the problem with making that argument is that in the light of an atheistic mind it comes off as a weakness because it puts you in a position of needing to explain the ''reason'' behind that scientific conclusion and of course in order to do so properly you would need to be ''OMNISCIENT" with an IQ roughly around 1,000 which in and of itself would render any explanation you give meaningless do to the fact that your God level intellect would trample over the minds of anyone else in the universe.
    The far more rational way to explain the existence of a higher consciousness to a literal ''vegetable like an atheist'' is to explain that it's a metaphysical conclusion that has to be taken with a little faith because we can in no way comprehend the reasoning aspect.
    God ''in a metaphysical sense'' isn't a crutch, God is a final frontier, a Divine conclusion of the highest order. Just as God created us there is a boomerang affect, through advanced states of spiritual liberation, we must in a sense discover and, in a sense, create God into our life by manifesting ourselves closer and closer to source reality.
    AS ABOVE SO BELOW.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому

      Based

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 7 місяців тому

      @jamesworely9888 so atheists should just accept the existence of God because it's a supposedly an universal agreed upon idea amongst metaphysicans despite you showing no evidence for this and the last time I checked metaphysicans aren't scientists and alot of the shit they say is speculation and are unfasliable meaning we can't even test some of there ideas

  • @philalethes216
    @philalethes216 6 місяців тому +1

    1:35:00 I wonder if this has any connection with the worldwide UFO sightings of the last hundred or so years among other parapsychological phenomena.

  • @mosesgarcia9443
    @mosesgarcia9443 8 місяців тому +4

    This will be one of the essential videos as we move into the Counter Enlightenment Movement. I love it.

  • @shannonvanderhoof4810
    @shannonvanderhoof4810 8 місяців тому +5

    Thank you. 🖤💦

  • @armandsseimors1663
    @armandsseimors1663 8 місяців тому +3

    Exceptional summary of upcoming scientific paradigm shift. I had been avoiding this video for weeks even if I knew it was great. Somethings changing an the past era of watching endless amounts of provocative stuff is past. Need we more than this time to time and some books?

  • @MothlingLXIX
    @MothlingLXIX 7 місяців тому +6

    Thank you for making these as a human and not chat gpt with an ai voiceover. Its hard finding real channels these days.

  • @dealensky
    @dealensky 6 місяців тому +2

    Awesome! 2,30h I watched without taking a breath 😊 I am not a scientist but this is resonating so much with what I feel and observe. And it is so full of hope and possibilities! Indeed, the right timing, i think, to be put in that rich way. I really hope humanity will go that direction! Thank you for the huge work! ❤

  • @TheGr8GamesReporter
    @TheGr8GamesReporter 8 місяців тому +4

    Bro, I love your videos so much, they are very appreciated, the concepts and what you talk about truly lights a fire in my core, I almost feel like its necessary to hear this stuff and learn it further.

  • @driggerfireon5760
    @driggerfireon5760 15 днів тому +1

    This is outstanding presentation!!!! Bravo

  • @futureproof.health
    @futureproof.health 8 місяців тому +2

    EPIC! the blind watchmaker awakens to a ‘kind of dreaming gardener’ ❤

  • @driggerfireon5760
    @driggerfireon5760 15 днів тому +1

    Michael levin is the next Nobel prize winner.

  • @robertoperez2579
    @robertoperez2579 14 днів тому +1

    This is my third listening of this presentation, and it leads me to a thought. This thesis is very much prone to deletion. One, well placed, solar flare or the whim of a censoring algorithm will make this information disappear. You should, very seriously, consider a written form of this work. My two cents...

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  14 днів тому

      Oh there is a script. I can send it to you if you email me

    • @robertoperez2579
      @robertoperez2579 14 днів тому

      @@Formscapes if only I owned a printer. But yes, I will email for the script. Thanks.

  • @driggerfireon5760
    @driggerfireon5760 15 днів тому +1

    This is a real voice, no AI here. Great.

  • @fsg2700
    @fsg2700 8 місяців тому +2

    This makes me slightly uneasy. Have you seen or read any works of robert sephr? He has a collection of work thats fuel for unhinged theorist, but nonetheless based in reality. Alledgetly there was a german national socialist colony under ice in Antarctica. General Byrd, operation highjump 1947🤷‍♂️💣

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому

      Yeah idk fam, that's not really my realm of expertise

    • @Silent_Depths
      @Silent_Depths 8 місяців тому +1

      Robert Sepehr had some questionable takes so I stopped listening to his videos a long time ago. I don't know his intentions, but the way he presented such cases could have been said better without implications to race superiority and whatever else he seemed to suggest. There are some wild theories out there based on some published evidence. Maybe check out quite popular youtubers like Mr. Mythos and The Why Files. Anything I've heard by them has been presented in good faith and without prejudice.

  • @EnigmaCodeCrusher
    @EnigmaCodeCrusher 3 місяці тому +2

    Great job providing specific examples

  • @heerosanosyuy1173
    @heerosanosyuy1173 7 місяців тому +1

    Is this morphic resonance just a way to describe things like how certain animals or insects gain a specific camoflauge or is this exclusively about plant adaptations ?

  • @zrez2241
    @zrez2241 2 дні тому +1

    In a word.. wow.

  • @bayloch
    @bayloch 8 місяців тому +3

    Incredibly fascinating, quality presentation. Top marks!

  • @PlanoAparente
    @PlanoAparente 5 місяців тому +1

    Damn, not a single mention of Zero Escape in the comments

  • @jdleland
    @jdleland 8 місяців тому +3

    This was amazing, mate--thank you for all your work!

  • @malibujew2
    @malibujew2 8 місяців тому +2

    Liking this video is morphic resonance playing out in the UA-cam domain.
    Do your part.

  • @robertoperez2579
    @robertoperez2579 8 місяців тому +2

    Each time I watch one of your videos, I find myself wishing that we were friends...chatting about this and that while having a pipe in the front yard...19th century style...

  • @dotdash2284
    @dotdash2284 8 місяців тому +4

    Gonna watch when I can
    Have you heard of Dr. Eugene McCarthy's ideas on hybrids as an alternative to Darwinistic evolution?
    Also from what I've seen you seem to really appreciate the metaphysis of Christianity, very refreshing

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +1

      I haven't heard of that, but I'll look into it. Christianity is a bit of a recurring theme throughout several of my videos, but that's a very very complicated story imo.

    • @dotdash2284
      @dotdash2284 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Formscapes I see Christianity as a completion of everything that came before it. I find the idea of universal history very compelling, might not be quite what you focus on but I like the work you do

    • @CelticStoryteller
      @CelticStoryteller 8 місяців тому

      @@dotdash2284 evolution has been simulated just as much as it has been observed. there will be no alternative that has more evidence than the kind observed because it's... the kind observed.

    • @miguelatkinson
      @miguelatkinson 7 місяців тому

      ​​@@dotdash2284 what does it mean for Christianity to be the "completion of everything" and why Christianity specifically speaking ?

    • @dotdash2284
      @dotdash2284 7 місяців тому

      @@miguelatkinson I believe that all the peoples of the world to greater or lesser degrees were/are holding onto fragments of the true story of humanity, and that that true story is of God revealing his love gradually to a world that had forgotten him so ultimately He could become incarnate and unite Himself to His creation. Richard Rohlin and Jonathan Pageau have a really intersting series that covers how converts from various peoples tied their histories to the biblical and apocryphal traditions if that kind of stuff interests you

  • @Seanus32
    @Seanus32 3 місяці тому +1

    @Formscapes - What is your take on panentheism? Any thoughts?

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  3 місяці тому +2

      Yeah you could describe my metaphysics as panentheistic. That term is often used to describe Whitehead and Schelling's cosmologies and I draw alot of influence from both of them.

    • @Seanus32
      @Seanus32 3 місяці тому

      @@Formscapes I like that answer. I'm curious, how would you answer the Islamic claim that God is not part of Creation? It is a matter of principle for most of them to say it but you can't carve up consciousness in that way IMHO.

  • @MichaelRainboy
    @MichaelRainboy 26 днів тому +1

    Wow! This is amazing!

  • @nihilistagalaico
    @nihilistagalaico 7 місяців тому +1

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
    04:07 🌱 *Rupert Sheldrake's Early Life and Academic Journey*
    - Rupert Sheldrake's upbringing and early interest in zoology and botany.
    - Sheldrake's shift from religious beliefs to atheism during his adolescence.
    - His academic pursuits, including studying biology, biochemistry, philosophy, and history of science at various prestigious institutions.
    08:10 📚 *Development of the Theory of Morphic Resonance*
    - Sheldrake's disillusionment with mechanistic explanations for plant morphogenesis.
    - The publication of "A New Science of Life" (1981) and its significance in introducing the theory of morphic resonance.
    - Sheldrake's argument against DNA molecules as the primary units of heredity, proposing instead the concept of morphogenetic fields.
    10:27 🌐 *Concept of Morphogenetic Fields in Developmental Biology*
    - The origin of the concept of morphogenetic fields by Alexander Gurwitsch in 1910.
    - Ambiguities and debates surrounding the definition and interpretation of morphogenetic fields in early 20th-century biology.
    - Sheldrake's redefinition of morphogenetic fields as causal entities beyond mechanistic explanations.
    13:12 🧬 *Neo-Darwinian Synthesis and Paradigm Shifts in Biology*
    - The rise of the Neo-Darwinian synthesis, emphasizing DNA as the primary determinant of heredity and evolution.
    - The ideological and scientific dominance of Neo-Darwinism in 20th-century biology.
    - Critiques of Neo-Darwinism and its challenges from recent developments in epigenetics and developmental biology.
    17:08 ⚛️ *Michael Levin's Research on Bioelectric Fields and Morphogenetic Fields*
    - Michael Levin's experiments with planarian flatworms demonstrating the role of bioelectric fields in regeneration and memory retention.
    - The inheritance of hereditary mutations through manipulation of morphogenetic fields without altering DNA sequences.
    - Insights from Levin's research challenging the exclusive role of DNA in determining phenotypic traits and suggesting a role for morphogenetic fields in organismal development.
    24:58 🌱 *Evolutionary implications of morphogenetic fields*
    - Genetic characteristics may be alterable through interaction with the environment.
    - Macromutation's role in evolution could be more significant than assumed within the neo-Darwinian paradigm.
    - Punctuated equilibrium theory challenges gradualism in evolution and suggests rapid speciation.
    27:14 🏞️ *Criticism of punctuated equilibrium and fitness landscape model*
    - Punctuated equilibrium theory proposes periods of rapid speciation punctuated by stability.
    - Critics argue against the theory due to the improbability of macromutations and favor gradualism.
    - Fitness landscape models depict evolutionary changes based on fitness advantages.
    30:14 🧬 *Organisms as self-organizing systems*
    - Organisms may self-organize and adapt to mutations purposively.
    - Phenotypic characteristics are not solely determined by DNA mutations.
    - Organisms exhibit purposive self-organization, unlike computational machines.
    35:35 🔄 *Introduction to morphic resonance theory*
    - Morphic resonance theory proposes non-local morphogenetic fields' influence across space and time.
    - Self-resonance suggests an organism's past influences its present morphic field.
    - Morphic resonance extends beyond individual organisms to influence collective behavior.
    41:03 🌐 *Morphogenetic fields and shaping living systems*
    - Morphogenetic fields condition the likelihood of events, shaping organic systems' development.
    - Morphic resonance operates through similarity within multi-dimensional living forms.
    - Living processes influence each other's development through morphic resonance.
    50:05 🧪 *Morphic Resonance and Synthetic Chemistry*
    - Morphic resonance predicts that older morphological structures are more stable than novel ones.
    - Synthetic chemical compounds initially face difficulties in formation without past influences.
    59:46 🧬 *Protein Folding Problem and AlphaFold*
    - The protein folding problem persists despite decades of research and computational attempts.
    - AlphaFold, an AI system, achieves some success in predicting protein structures but lacks explanatory power.
    01:05:01 🧠 *Metaphysical Paradigms and Mechanistic Reductionism*
    - Metaphysical paradigms shape scientific discourse and interpretation of empirical data.
    - Mechanistic reductionism, rooted in the metaphor of the machine, dominates scientific thinking.
    01:11:10 🌐 *Dualism in Early Scientific Thinking*
    - Early scientific thinking bifurcated reality into objective matter and subjective mind.
    - Matter was considered deterministic, reducible, and devoid of freedom or subjectivity.
    01:14:19 🧠 *The Evolution of Materialism and Dualism*
    - Materialist monism emerged as a rejection of mind-matter dualism, advocating that the world consists only of matter.
    - Conscious agency and freedom were considered illusory in the materialist monist worldview, reducing consciousness to mechanical processes.
    01:16:11 🔄 *Contrasting Views on Free Will*
    - Materialistic perspectives often argue that free will is illusory, attributing human behavior solely to deterministic neural processes.
    - Morphic resonance proposes a form of formative causation, suggesting that wholes can direct their own development, including cognition and behavior.
    01:22:31 🔄 *Process Philosophy and Whitehead's Metaphysical Framework*
    - Process philosophy, exemplified by Alfred North Whitehead, offers an alternative to mechanistic materialism by conceptualizing the world as consisting of self-generative events.
    - Whitehead's philosophy of organism proposes that the world comprises organic processes, including subjective experiences, at all levels of existence.
    01:29:11 🌱 *Morphic Resonance in the Context of Process Philosophy*
    - Morphic fields, as proposed by Rupert Sheldrake, align with Whitehead's metaphysical framework, portraying nature as fundamentally organic and self-organizing.
    - Animacy is inherent in the basic elements of the world, and morphic fields organize themselves into nested hierarchies to generate complex forms of agency and experience.
    01:38:04 🧠 *Understanding Memory in Different Frameworks*
    - Memory viewed through mechanistic materialism
    - Carl Lashley's experiments on memory storage in the brain
    01:43:59 🧬 *Memory and Consciousness in Bergson's Philosophy*
    - Henri Bergson's perspective on memory and consciousness
    - Mind and matter integration in Bergson's ontology
    01:47:24 🌐 *Understanding Memory through Morphic Resonance*
    - Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance
    - Memory as presence of the past rather than stored information
    01:52:36 🌀 *Parapsychological Phenomena and Morphic Resonance*
    - Parapsychological phenomena as natural features in a morphic resonance world
    - Sheldrake's perspective on telepathy and out-of-body experiences
    02:00:17 🔍 *Sheldrake's Telephone Telepathy Experiment*
    - Sheldrake conducted telephone telepathy experiments involving nominees and recipients.
    - Nominees were asked to call recipients who had to guess who would call them before the call.
    02:05:31 🐕 *Sheldrake's Dog Waiting Experiment*
    - Sheldrake studied dogs' behavior awaiting their owners' return.
    - Dogs exhibited increased anticipation during pre-return and return periods, suggesting non-local interaction.
    02:08:17 🧠 *EEG Correlation Experiments*
    - EEG correlation experiments demonstrated non-local interaction between human minds.
    - Results consistently showed statistically significant correlations between brain activities of sender and receiver subjects.
    02:11:06 📚 *Extensive Parapsychological Research*
    - Over 750 studies analyzed indicate evidence comparable to established psychological phenomena.
    02:14:03 💭 *Collective Unconscious and Morphic Resonance*
    - The collective unconscious, as described by Carl Jung, suggests a shared psychic realm.
    - Morphic resonance offers insights into non-local interactions that shape individual and collective psyches.
    02:22:02 🐾 *Insights into Anomalous Phenomena*
    - Anomalous phenomena and experiences are widespread and challenging to explain solely through mechanistic causation.
    - Experiences with substances like Noo-noo offer insights into dissociating mental processes from immediate sensory orientations, potentially allowing connection with surrounding environments.
    02:23:25 🌿 *Understanding Noo-noo's Effects*
    - Noo-noo may dissociate mental processes from immediate sensory stimuli, enabling practitioners to connect with surrounding environments.
    - Environmental contexts, like religious buildings, can influence mental processes, guiding them into morphological spaces shaped by collective experiences.
    02:25:41 🔮 *Exploring Clairvoyance and Telepathy*
    - Gorman's experience with wild boars suggests a form of clairvoyance, where he perceived future events.
    - Substances like Noo-noo might induce experiences that tap into animals' intentions or memories, offering insights into future events.
    Made with HARPA AI

  • @ralphlotus
    @ralphlotus 8 місяців тому +2

    💎💎

  • @theholybear1094
    @theholybear1094 8 місяців тому +7

    FIRST VIEW(as told by youtube!)

  • @anthonysabatino4317
    @anthonysabatino4317 10 днів тому

    The flesh uses its deterministic nature to move across probabilistic nature so it might survive. A fly uses its wings to put itself into a new place which is better for its survival. A gene changes so that more might be under the dominion of the organism for that which can control more of the environment is that which survives often. Consciousness is that which directs these transformations.

  • @Akincan61
    @Akincan61 2 місяці тому

    This idea was like a higher level item in a game. I found it, i couldn't stop thinking about it, but can't properly equip it...

  • @EnigmaCodeCrusher
    @EnigmaCodeCrusher 28 днів тому +1

    Many thanks!

  • @Jueyes-vg2gb
    @Jueyes-vg2gb 6 місяців тому

    It is called God, I know its almost IMPOSSIBLE for the modern human mind to accept God, but why can we accept that we come from nothingness but cannot accept that maybe God came first from nothingness. I can believe a supreme being of energy could come into existence out of nothingness before we ever could

  • @priceyindividual2995
    @priceyindividual2995 4 місяці тому +1

    displacement and replacement of previous forms is some wild stuff

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  4 місяці тому +1

      Wild stuff which has been almost completely ignored as well. Who knows how wild it could actually turn out to be once we really start investigating. Noone has ever bothered to seriously look at the phenomenon!

    • @priceyindividual2995
      @priceyindividual2995 4 місяці тому

      @@Formscapes It really stood out to me because I have never heard of such a thing before and it seems like something that we should be investigating... The Ritonavir situation and the way it is talked about in the literature is especially incredible.
      Thank you for what you're doing with this channel, you are exposing those who are willing to listen to some really astounding and potentially paradigm shattering stuff. I'll be coming back to this video later as a jumping off point to further study this subject.

  • @minushuman
    @minushuman 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for this incredible video. I wonder, if memes could act as morphic germs. Do we by consumption of media enjoyed by losers attract misfortune? Billions of people use specific types of media as coping mechanism for their miserable life, should we avoid this media because of morphic resonance?
    Also I think Ars Notoria is an example of intentional usage of morphic resonance by ancients. Students of medieval univercities chanted angelic names and pondered noteyes and rapidly acquired knowledge which previous generations of students had.

  • @girlhag
    @girlhag 8 місяців тому +2

    awesome!! this topic reminded me of micheal levins work, so i’m very happy to see it integrated here. i always thought his work had more metaphysical implications than i could put into words, great job!

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +1

      I also found out some new stuff - right after I published this video, unfortunately - which gets even weirder, and even more suggestive of Morphic Resonance imo. Check out the podcast episode "Bernardo Kastrup | Michael Levin Part 2 - With Reality in Mind"

  • @johnosborne2716
    @johnosborne2716 3 місяці тому +1

    Yeah, that was good.

  • @bmwbarbiedoll
    @bmwbarbiedoll 8 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video. You should look up the works of John Worrell Keely and Dale Pond, John Quimby. (If you haven't already) Which fit nicely into your exposition and come at it from different angles.

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +1

      "sympathetic vibratory science"
      Yeah this definitely seems up my alley. I'll check it out, thanks!

  • @Jueyes-vg2gb
    @Jueyes-vg2gb 6 місяців тому

    Before you start falling for this idea tht we live in a simulated or simulacrum universe you might want to watch James Lindsay's three part series called "The Secret Religions of the west" pretty much everything in the world that makes zero sense suddenly make all the sense in the world

  • @driggerfireon5760
    @driggerfireon5760 15 днів тому

    Richard Dawkins: blind himself , can’t not see, sees his own blindness in the system.

  • @Sephaos
    @Sephaos 5 місяців тому

    The purpose of life is to create more complex life. We play the game to experience the game. Let’s start playing co-op instead of single player, yeah?

  • @sabaloukhan
    @sabaloukhan 4 місяці тому +1

    thank. you.

  • @thomaslangkvist5830
    @thomaslangkvist5830 2 місяці тому

    Why dont talk about enzymes when showing it. Or dont they know how they behave or look like?

  • @SPOOFY_D
    @SPOOFY_D 6 місяців тому +1

    Is this why everything becomes crabs eventually?

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  6 місяців тому +1

      I touch upon the theoretical implications of convergent evolution - including carcinization specifically - in my video about Teilhard De Chardin, but that video is rather old and that specific topic is in need of a more updated evaluation. Forms seem to be able to instantiate themselves inasmuch as evolution is able to find forms through the advance of natural selection, and carcinization is only one example which seems to allude to that fact.

    • @SPOOFY_D
      @SPOOFY_D 6 місяців тому

      @@Formscapes
      I was honestly just meming. Totally didn't expect a reply (from you of all people at least!).
      I really love your stuff, man. Found you with the "Accelerating Spiral of Time" video. Literally changed my life. Keep it up!

    • @joshuafernandes6684
      @joshuafernandes6684 2 місяці тому

      ​@@Formscapes, it would be nice to check Simon Conway's works on Convergent Evolution for a new video on this.

  • @ruimvdd
    @ruimvdd Місяць тому

    so you're either onto something actually plausible or i found my own niche flat earth haha

  • @minecraftermad
    @minecraftermad 8 місяців тому +1

    The implications of this being true, even without taking nonlocality into account since all of this can be explained by slower than light phenomenon, like hidden variable traversal by universal entanglement(writing a chapter on this soon:tm:); you could say that its no wonder that the science world is apprehensive of this idea. It touches everything and allows for laws of physics being practically mutable by conscious beings, aka magic. Though if the age of a concept solidifies it's existence, it would explain why we don't have universal law twisting magicians.
    and if it is past causality, as in faster than light, it would mean it would be impossible to measure, in any way, every measurement ever would conclude that things have always been this way. if light speed suddenly changed, all the past measurements would coincide with the one that is now reality, locality in a way stabilizes reality into a comprehensible mess, instead of an incomprehensible one.

  • @raycosmic9019
    @raycosmic9019 8 місяців тому +1

    Wholes are by definition ever greater than the sum of their constituents - not reducible.

  • @auggiemarsh8682
    @auggiemarsh8682 8 місяців тому +2

    Recently discovered your channel. Deeply grateful for your synopsis of Sheldrake’s oeuvre and your synthesis of his ideas in such an original manner. Only half way through and so captivated I had to comment now

    • @Formscapes
      @Formscapes  8 місяців тому +1

      Much appreciated, fam
      😎👉👉

    • @Nature_Consciousness
      @Nature_Consciousness 8 місяців тому

      @@Formscapes Do you know what happened to your morphic resonance videos? I dont find them anymore in the channel.