Hey Steve, how are you? I started to watch Toronto Maple Leafs games because of you (I live in Brazil). I don't know how I got to your youtube channel, but now I'm always waiting to hear what you have to say about the games! So thank you for this! You're great!
Seeing as the PENS won a cup on a goal that was called back. Yah, they need to shuddup. That game with the Preds should have @ least gone to overtime. -- Video was worth the wait Steve...well done!
That no goal was 100% the right call. Look at where the ref was standing, he can see Duomolin make contact with freddie, then sees freddie slide out of position after the contact, which is clearly goaltender interferance. He sees the penalty and tries to call the play dead as Pitts has posession. Therefore anything that ensues after the contact with the goalie is not part of play. You can not score a goal if the play is dead when you touch the puck. Therefore nothing to review. No goal
Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player's position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. """"""Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal"""""; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. """"Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated ""outside"" of the goal crease"""", provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review. In other words, the Penguins player hit Andersen when the goalie was inside his crease (contact to the head even if it was accidental) therefore the ref could call a penalty and wave off the goal. """: Important points
I think Steve understands what goalie interference is, it's the fact that it was a penalty that is raising some eyebrows. Again, consistency would be nice.
That was my first Leafs’ game at the ACC. (I live in MTL, so I see Leafs/Habs all the time.) Decided to go see this one for my birthday. They won, I’m happy. Life is good. Go Leafs.
I can't believe that nobody sees what I (a goalie myself) sees on that play. Before Dumoulin makes contact with Freddie's head, and before Hainsey even touches him, Dumoulin's back skate makes contact with Freddie's back leg. This stops Freddie from making his butterfly push, and thus is GOALIE INTERFERENCE!
There was no goal in the first place. Because of the goaltender interference anything that happened after that didn't count. The ref just didn't have time between contact and the goal to blow the whistle.
The hand wringing that some Leafs fans go through when we 'get a call' boggles my mind. I'm a Leafs fan - I want all the calls and I love it when we get them. I absolutely could care less if some hot head opposition coach or loud mouth fans are pissed that a call went the Leafs way. To be honest it adds a tasty sauce.
High sticking is the same thing as goalie interference. No goal due to high sticking, no penalty. High sticking minor is still a thing. One is basically interference on the goaltender = penalty. The other is a illegal way to score a goal. I like the elbowing penalty question, it really puts things into perspective for those who may not understand fully what happened
This is different cause on has to do with touching the puck over the crossbar and the other has to do this hitting a playing in the face. Although they both involve lifting your stick to high, it is allot easier to distinguish between the penalty and no goal than goalie interference.
No no no. Not nice. No. Ok, yes it was a great game by the Leafs; I understand that I'm just a salty and upset Penguins fan. We'll see you in the Conference Finals, everyone. It was frustrating that the Penguins couldn't convert but Freddy deserves a lot of credit for his phenomenal goaltending and the Leafs just played a great game after the first 10 minutes when the Pens were dominating. That's all I'm going to say because you're right Steve, we as Pens fans deserve NO sympathy because it's NOT harrrrrrduh to be a Pens fan and we need to stop acting like it is.
I thought the goal was good at first, but when you look at it carefully, the ref made the right call. Justin Fisher has it right. And I hope Sullivan keeps thinking it was the "bad call" that lost them the game.
That play was the equivalent of me bumping into you which directly causes you collide with the goalie. That is a goal and no penalty, except maybe embellishing.
See, I don't think it was interference cause the puck was already behind Andersen and on its way past the line when contact was made, no matter what he was beat and wasn't going to stop the puck. I'm a Leafs fan and I don't get why that goal was called back, especially after the Buffalo game.....
I think for goaltender interference, it should only be called if the contact is 100% the contacters fault (i.e. not getting pushed into the goalie or net even slightly), and the player has a clear path away from the goalie (he's not being prevented from going around). Also, maybe it's time we start to be able to challenge penalties like the CFL.
The reason the goal isn't even reviewable on the penalty is because the whistle is blown as soon as the reff sees it since the offending team has possession of the puck at the time of the penalty. Therefore, the puck shouldn't even cross the goal line before the whistle goes. If the whistle goes before the puck crosses the line... no goal... ever. So goaltender interference can't be reviewed since the play is blown dead as soon as the penaly happens.
I was thinking the special teams were quite special while watching this game, and not special like short bus, like special as in I'm glad that my team. :)
They're was no review because you can't call a review on a penalty. The ref immediately waved off the goal because he was going to call a penalty and because the penguins have position of the puck, the whistle blows and it's no goal because the play was dead technically.
Goalie interference= contact with goalie if you are in the crease. They should adopt the rule that if your foot is in the crease, the play is blown dead. That's what they are trying to implement now. This would help out so much. It would anger a lot of people, but there would be no jugement calls, if the players skate is in the crease=NO GOAL, if players skate is not in crease=GOOD GOAL.
Hey Steve was wondering if you could find out one day why Ron Ellis's jersey is not up in the rafters. I know he was given Ace Bailey's number but still his name should be up there. 4th all time Leafs points. Stanley Cup. Beast player but they don't honor him. As I am distantly related to him, I find this oversight as a slam.
Steve, what was that message you sent about not being able to do any videos for 5 days about? Was it the basement flooding situation? What's the status of that BTW?
Its said that they don't play 50 mission cap enough at the games and not like they used to. But when they do play 50 mission cap nobody sings and its shame that its a leafs song by the Tragically Hip and the late Gord Downie was a Bruins fan. All leaf fans should sing as the song comes because '51 was one of those big years in franchise history in franchise history and it tells a true story like all the other Hip song. So everyone when it comes on everybody should sing it.
I think the reason dumolin got the penalty was because his elbow hit Anderson in the head and if you remember last year game 81 leafs pens Tom setsito hit Anderson right in the head and Curtis won that game
The fact is it was a penalty, the unfortunate thing is tripping elbowing etc usually on a goalie is goalie interference, which is somewhat different from the goal reviews. that goalie interference was no different then if the puck headed to kessel while malkin slashed Kadri for a penalty and kessel shot it and went in, it would be called back like that would. a penalty happened and the goal followed it was just quick in how it happened.
idk, like I didnt see this game but watching highlights, would freddy have saved that if dumo hadnt touched him.. I kinda doubt it, then again I really dont care because the caps and flyers are erratic so our position is safe
My view is if he didn't have the puck and hit Andersen like that it is 100% a penalty, not even up for debate. However since he had the puck he's allowed to do it?
Sorry it's late, everyone.
SteveDangle love you Steve
Dude, legends don't need to be sorry when they're throwing out fire like this video.
SteveDangle its okay. So happy ur back
I could never get mad at my favorite youtuber
SteveDangle a lot of pens fans are Canadian so the CBC feed is better
Raps clinched the playoffs
Marlies clinched the playoffs
Leafs will clinch the playoffs
Its a good time to be a Toronto Sports fan
BUDS ALL DAY
TFC won the Supporters Shield and the MLS Championship. Toronto Argos won the Grey Cup
Blue jays are dreadful
Ruqayah and hey blue jays and TFC are going to be great this year too
Leafsfan 3416 blue jays not even close but tfc yes
The Leafs get their 40th win in 69 games. Auston Matthews scored 40 goals with 69 points last year. Coincidence? I think not.
illuminati confirmed.
Hotel? Trivago.
Nice
Druid Hood
Very noooiiice
Adam Chopstick son of a bitch you beat me to it
Spot on Pittsburgh fan imitation
I have not watched the video yet and by the thumbnail I can already tell Steve did the “ohhhhhhh nooooo” lol
Hey Steve, how are you? I started to watch Toronto Maple Leafs games because of you (I live in Brazil). I don't know how I got to your youtube channel, but now I'm always waiting to hear what you have to say about the games! So thank you for this! You're great!
Ive been waiting all day for this vid im hype
This might be the latest lfr upload of all time
My two fav parts were the Tessa/Scott comment and the castle thing 😂 LOL and yes I’m watching old Steve videos ;)
Seeing as the PENS won a cup on a goal that was called back. Yah, they need to shuddup. That game with the Preds should have @ least gone to overtime. -- Video was worth the wait Steve...well done!
David Tew yeh they won a best of seven game series over that one call
David Tew pens still would've won the game. Pens were the better team.
- Subban winning the Cup OR
- Sergachev and McDonagh
- Plekanec
Instances in which you would never have to salt the roads in Montreal again.
I'm just glad 1 elbow to freddy's head was finally called.
That no goal was 100% the right call. Look at where the ref was standing, he can see Duomolin make contact with freddie, then sees freddie slide out of position after the contact, which is clearly goaltender interferance. He sees the penalty and tries to call the play dead as Pitts has posession. Therefore anything that ensues after the contact with the goalie is not part of play. You can not score a goal if the play is dead when you touch the puck. Therefore nothing to review. No goal
"YOU'RE IN A CASTLE!" better be in next year's LFR intro
Felt like it took 67 years for this to be uploaded.
Aubrey Maiers well now I’m sad...
Polak was fantastic. Got in Sid's face all night and took him and Malkin off their game.
Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player's position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. """"""Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal"""""; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. """"Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated ""outside"" of the goal crease"""", provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review.
In other words, the Penguins player hit Andersen when the goalie was inside his crease (contact to the head even if it was accidental) therefore the ref could call a penalty and wave off the goal.
""": Important points
I think Steve understands what goalie interference is, it's the fact that it was a penalty that is raising some eyebrows. Again, consistency would be nice.
When you get pushed into the goalie, the player can't do much.
Joseph Da Silva well no you're wrong
That was my first Leafs’ game at the ACC. (I live in MTL, so I see Leafs/Habs all the time.) Decided to go see this one for my birthday. They won, I’m happy. Life is good. Go Leafs.
I can't believe that nobody sees what I (a goalie myself) sees on that play. Before Dumoulin makes contact with Freddie's head, and before Hainsey even touches him, Dumoulin's back skate makes contact with Freddie's back leg. This stops Freddie from making his butterfly push, and thus is GOALIE INTERFERENCE!
It was hard to wait for a video,but thy did it
There was no goal in the first place. Because of the goaltender interference anything that happened after that didn't count. The ref just didn't have time between contact and the goal to blow the whistle.
Victory puppies!
I have been waiting all day for this, seriously, i am a Leafs fan too and i love his videos, i love whenever he makes a video. :) keep it up man
Steve!!! You're back!!! And with VICTORY PUPPIES!!! Wooooooooo!!!
Did you hear the Marlies Clinched a playoff spot?
Isabelle Ferrante God the marlies are too good right now
The Virtue and Moir bit 😂😂
Steve you always make me want to watch the replay again :)
The hand wringing that some Leafs fans go through when we 'get a call' boggles my mind. I'm a Leafs fan - I want all the calls and I love it when we get them. I absolutely could care less if some hot head opposition coach or loud mouth fans are pissed that a call went the Leafs way. To be honest it adds a tasty sauce.
"YOU'RE IN A CASTLE!" and "life is so haaaarduh"
2 things for next year's intro.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, STEVE!
High sticking is the same thing as goalie interference. No goal due to high sticking, no penalty. High sticking minor is still a thing. One is basically interference on the goaltender = penalty. The other is a illegal way to score a goal. I like the elbowing penalty question, it really puts things into perspective for those who may not understand fully what happened
This is different cause on has to do with touching the puck over the crossbar and the other has to do this hitting a playing in the face.
Although they both involve lifting your stick to high, it is allot easier to distinguish between the penalty and no goal than goalie interference.
Your Pens fan imitation made me cackle :3
Knowing Matthews is very injury prone is so *HARRRRDDDDDUHHHH*
87 points. Nice.
“YOU’RE IN A CASTLE!”
yea steve 100% drank coffee before this. HOLY Auctioner
"Hockey doesn't care about your feelings" lmaooo it probably isn't but great Shapiro reference
Dianara Abarca nah steve is a libtard
I'll never believe it
No no no. Not nice. No. Ok, yes it was a great game by the Leafs; I understand that I'm just a salty and upset Penguins fan. We'll see you in the Conference Finals, everyone. It was frustrating that the Penguins couldn't convert but Freddy deserves a lot of credit for his phenomenal goaltending and the Leafs just played a great game after the first 10 minutes when the Pens were dominating. That's all I'm going to say because you're right Steve, we as Pens fans deserve NO sympathy because it's NOT harrrrrrduh to be a Pens fan and we need to stop acting like it is.
Do Plekanec puppies wear turtlenecks?
Christa613 Yep and they speak french while wearing a toilet hat.
I thought the goal was good at first, but when you look at it carefully, the ref made the right call. Justin Fisher has it right. And I hope Sullivan keeps thinking it was the "bad call" that lost them the game.
That play was the equivalent of me bumping into you which directly causes you collide with the goalie. That is a goal and no penalty, except maybe embellishing.
Well no, you're wrong.
It was the right call.
I don't think it was the right call. I know it was.
So me and Steve both wanted to be Athletes. Ones famous on UA-cam. One works in McDonald's. Am I that bad a person?
I used to work there, too.
Real gud BigMcElhinney
Nice
happy birthday steve!
Actually, I would LOVE to see Plekanec get the cup, this guy gave everything for us.
13:08-13:18 I'm dying 😂
Hey Steve! Saw your instagram and your birthday recently passed. Just wanted to say HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY! :D
based intro
i knew that would be the title
Such a good title
See, I don't think it was interference cause the puck was already behind Andersen and on its way past the line when contact was made, no matter what he was beat and wasn't going to stop the puck. I'm a Leafs fan and I don't get why that goal was called back, especially after the Buffalo game.....
I needed this #victorypuppies
Game 69 that hilarious
Doug Glatt
VICTORY PUPPIES!!!!!!
0:49 "Penguins fans" ... you mean like Jim Hughson?
As a pens fan I would just like to say OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO..
YOU’RE IN A CASTLE
I can't watch a Steve Dangle video without first popping 2 ibuprofen
The called back a penalty on Kadri last year. He drew one, and then they were like naaaah, and took back the power play.
I'm a Penguins fan, and well the leafs just had it during this game.
Nice.
I think for goaltender interference, it should only be called if the contact is 100% the contacters fault (i.e. not getting pushed into the goalie or net even slightly), and the player has a clear path away from the goalie (he's not being prevented from going around). Also, maybe it's time we start to be able to challenge penalties like the CFL.
I’m a pens fan and I’m lmao at that last tweet... our “rough patch” has us first in the metro I think we’re fine bud
13:28 best part
nice
The reason the goal isn't even reviewable on the penalty is because the whistle is blown as soon as the reff sees it since the offending team has possession of the puck at the time of the penalty. Therefore, the puck shouldn't even cross the goal line before the whistle goes. If the whistle goes before the puck crosses the line... no goal... ever. So goaltender interference can't be reviewed since the play is blown dead as soon as the penaly happens.
I was thinking the special teams were quite special while watching this game, and not special like short bus, like special as in I'm glad that my team. :)
FINALLY!!!
I scarily relate to side hat leaf fan guy lol
Screw them Go Leafs!
They're was no review because you can't call a review on a penalty. The ref immediately waved off the goal because he was going to call a penalty and because the penguins have position of the puck, the whistle blows and it's no goal because the play was dead technically.
Game 69. Nice.
I like you. I like your videos. You are a likeable guy.
Oh no, the Penguins suck now! Woe is me!
I don't say this often (possibly ever) but Polak had a good game.
Goalie interference= contact with goalie if you are in the crease. They should adopt the rule that if your foot is in the crease, the play is blown dead. That's what they are trying to implement now. This would help out so much. It would anger a lot of people, but there would be no jugement calls, if the players skate is in the crease=NO GOAL, if players skate is not in crease=GOOD GOAL.
*Cough* 1999 Stanley Cup Finals *Cough*
Do you think the victory puppies now they are only filmed for a leafs win?
Dadddddyyyyy
I feel Nikita zaitsev I think that is how you spell it I literally just had the flu
Hey Steve was wondering if you could find out one day why Ron Ellis's jersey is not up in the rafters. I know he was given Ace Bailey's number but still his name should be up there. 4th all time Leafs points. Stanley Cup. Beast player but they don't honor him. As I am distantly related to him, I find this oversight as a slam.
There was also this astronaut guy at the game .... but ya
Who else thing 13:36 should be in the LFR intro next year?
Steve, what was that message you sent about not being able to do any videos for 5 days about? Was it the basement flooding situation? What's the status of that BTW?
Actually yelled that at them
AM34 was robbed of 2 goals for looking at the goalie, ask me if I feel bad when Freddie took a head shot on the play.
Its said that they don't play 50 mission cap enough at the games and not like they used to. But when they do play 50 mission cap nobody sings and its shame that its a leafs song by the Tragically Hip and the late Gord Downie was a Bruins fan. All leaf fans should sing as the song comes because '51 was one of those big years in franchise history in franchise history and it tells a true story like all the other Hip song. So everyone when it comes on everybody should sing it.
Hey Steve were you at the game in a red collar shirt?
I think the reason dumolin got the penalty was because his elbow hit Anderson in the head and if you remember last year game 81 leafs pens Tom setsito hit Anderson right in the head and Curtis won that game
What happened to going with the ref’s call?
Why is the video down?
How long did it take you to think of the title of this video
Goaltender interference is not a headshot, which is what freddy received. HEAD SHOT, SHOT TO THE HEAD.
Nova SuperNova BECAUSE HE WAS SHOVED INTO HIM BY A LEAFS DEFENSEMEN YOU FUCKING MORON
Justin Walters no he wasn't
Justin Walters you fucking moron
Hey, you stay away from Duncan Keith and our first world Blackhawks problems!
When is the next podcast?
The fact is it was a penalty, the unfortunate thing is tripping elbowing etc usually on a goalie is goalie interference, which is somewhat different from the goal reviews. that goalie interference was no different then if the puck headed to kessel while malkin slashed Kadri for a penalty and kessel shot it and went in, it would be called back like that would. a penalty happened and the goal followed it was just quick in how it happened.
idk, like I didnt see this game but watching highlights, would freddy have saved that if dumo hadnt touched him.. I kinda doubt it, then again I really dont care because the caps and flyers are erratic so our position is safe
Also, you had me worried with how late this came out. Everything okay?
Oddly enough, I thought Polak had a great game
Jesse Shore I kind of agree
How's the basement?
My view is if he didn't have the puck and hit Andersen like that it is 100% a penalty, not even up for debate. However since he had the puck he's allowed to do it?
Whatcare your puppies?