SpaceX launches new Starlink batch, nails 100th Falcon 9 landing

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лют 2022
  • SpaceX launched 46 new Starlink satellites from Space Launch Complex-40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on Feb. 21, 2022. The first stage of the Falcon 9 rocket landed on the "A Shortfall of Gravitas" drone ship minutes later in the Atlantic Ocean. Full Story: www.space.com/spacex-starlink...
    It was the 100th landing of a Falcon 9 rocket first stage.
    Credit: SpaceX
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 163

  • @irpat54
    @irpat54 2 роки тому +56

    I never get tired of watching these launches and landings, I'm old enough to remember when the NASA rockets were blowing up at launch, and as a kid I used to dream about landing these rockets back on the earth, that was Space Angel, and, Fireball XL5 stuff...

    • @gwhyte01
      @gwhyte01 2 роки тому +1

      I friggin love them. They always make my day.

  • @insPIreMath
    @insPIreMath 2 роки тому +13

    Unbelievably well choreographed (:

  • @MaddogJones
    @MaddogJones 2 роки тому +22

    Um... they made their 100th successful Falcon 9 landing on Dec 21, 2021 . Flight 134 with the CRS 24 mission to resupply the ISS. It landed on Just Read The Instructions in the Atlantic Ocean. Incidentally this was done on the sixth anniversary of their first landing which was Flight 20 Orbcomm OG2 M2, Dec. 21 2015.

    • @Human-lx2hs
      @Human-lx2hs 2 роки тому +1

      🧐

    • @alfredmorganroth9349
      @alfredmorganroth9349 2 роки тому +2

      Brilliant work , now if the government would just step back and let Starship fly ,and let space travel step ahead.

    • @keent
      @keent 2 роки тому

      @@alfredmorganroth9349 they did choose starship to land on mars

  • @wrldedits1999
    @wrldedits1999 2 роки тому +3

    Saw these satellites pass over my house this morning, it was extraordinary!

  • @gregorysagegreene
    @gregorysagegreene 2 роки тому

    Incredible on 100th anniversary how routine ascent, landing, and associated callouts are.

  • @moun10high
    @moun10high 2 роки тому +3

    Year 2022 and still no lag free videos.

  • @drumz451
    @drumz451 2 роки тому +8

    Its speed just goes up like a rocket
    Literally

  • @garylester8621
    @garylester8621 2 роки тому +3

    NASA must be green with envy.

  • @rajayosafat.6048
    @rajayosafat.6048 2 роки тому +2

    Good job...thanks for your sharing .

  • @ivanpaezcabo6300
    @ivanpaezcabo6300 2 роки тому +1

    Great, but why they cut the transmition of the rocket landing in the last 1000 mts (or fts) and sudendly at 200 mts (or fts) for touch the land they turn the transmition again?

  • @mosiengineer2894
    @mosiengineer2894 2 роки тому

    Perfect and nice thanks for Chanel and videos 🙏

  • @sylviaelse5086
    @sylviaelse5086 2 роки тому +2

    The first stage is not using just the grid fins for steering. We can clearly see the cold gas thrusters in operation.

    • @reisk1777
      @reisk1777 2 роки тому

      I caught that too. Technically, though, she's probably right - as the first stage comes into the atmosphere it is the grid fins are directly responsible for steering the stage. But if you image the first stage as a fast falling pencil, and you are only able to touch the eraser to change the orientation of the pencil's fall, her comment makes more sense - your finger steers the rock, but the cold gas thrusters allow the lower part of the rocket to line up with the direction set by your finger (the grid fins.)
      Her comment didn't seem right, but it made me stop and think about it.

  • @exospaceman8209
    @exospaceman8209 2 роки тому

    I saw the launch in cape it was awesome never saw it up close

  • @DeathValleyDazed
    @DeathValleyDazed 2 роки тому +4

    Go SpaceX🚀

  • @leovolkwyn4350
    @leovolkwyn4350 2 роки тому

    I need to know something. Watch on the right side at T+00:03:52. What is that walking or rolling under the silver part of the rocket? I watched it over and over and to me it looks like a fly or even a small car with wheels. Check it out for yourself

  • @nardusellis655
    @nardusellis655 2 роки тому

    Every time it's amazes me.....!!!!

  • @johnruckman2320
    @johnruckman2320 2 роки тому

    So when are they going to start recovering the second stage?

  • @majestic7768
    @majestic7768 2 роки тому

    Yet the cut off the video link in space. Must be shot in IMAX studio which has edges.

  • @harshanahar
    @harshanahar 2 роки тому +2

    Love from India

  • @spiffdandy77
    @spiffdandy77 2 роки тому +1

    relanding these first stage vehicles is something of which I consider a technology miracle. I remember in the early 70's watching Star Trek and thinking ...there is no way these 'communicators' can contact a vehicle in space.. now we have it and are living it. People like Elon Musk need to be lifted up and supported wholeheartedly for the good they are doing to humanity!

  • @paulbrunton877
    @paulbrunton877 2 роки тому +1

    As always a perfect landing for Falcon 9 , but when are they going to sort out the camera on the booster so it doesn't go off right on the landing moment,, it's a shame that it happens as it's a fabulous moment to see the booster complete it's return home.

    • @scottmjohnson1980
      @scottmjohnson1980 2 роки тому

      better than NASA daaaarling

    • @greeneyezar
      @greeneyezar 2 роки тому

      They can’t show certain camera views due to international privacy laws.

  • @elrodjenkins
    @elrodjenkins 2 роки тому +2

    Seriously, what are those things rolling around on the top of the second stage engine? Check out 6:17

    • @craigevans8912
      @craigevans8912 2 роки тому

      I’ve wondered that myself as I’ve noticed it on a few launches

    • @rozeyrose392
      @rozeyrose392 2 роки тому +1

      It's frozen liquid oxygen vented out by the engines. It happens on every launch.

    • @iwastoldtherewouldbenomath6869
      @iwastoldtherewouldbenomath6869 2 роки тому

      I think it was an errant snack wrapper. I could be wrong though....

  • @Beta250trials
    @Beta250trials 2 роки тому

    Space x space x space fantastic

  • @Rick9482
    @Rick9482 2 роки тому +3

    Damn, and Jeff was having such a nice President's Day until Space X did it all again and spoiled it.
    Geez, those guys do make it look so easy!

  • @rattywoof5259
    @rattywoof5259 2 роки тому +1

    6:40 - wrong. The thrusters we can see firing are also adjusting the attitude of the booster, i.e. steering it. Yes, the grid fins do help to steer, but their primary function is aerodynamic braking.

    • @andrew40085
      @andrew40085 2 роки тому +1

      The narrator works at spacex, I think she knows what shes talking about
      grid fins arent aerobrakes, their primary function is steering

    • @rattywoof5259
      @rattywoof5259 2 роки тому

      ​@@andrew40085 Not in this case she doesn't. BTW, why are you afraid of apostrophes?

    • @andrew40085
      @andrew40085 2 роки тому

      @@rattywoof5259 ua-cam.com/video/4_ePBpwMhns/v-deo.html In this official video at 9:02 you can see the same narrator at spaces headquarters
      I dont think you know more about this than her

    • @x808drifter
      @x808drifter 2 роки тому

      She is right "technically" They use the fins for steering. They use the thrusters for orientation.
      Steering and orientation are not the same. One is changing the vehicles flight path, the other is keeping the vehicle upright until there is enough air to take over.
      People differentiate between the two because arguing over minute like that makes you look like an ass.
      And the fins are in no way "for aerodynamic braking."
      Unless you are using it in reference to how they work, then yes. "Technically" they are air brakes.
      Like how feathers on an arrow are also "air brakes."
      Which again, arguing that point makes you sound like an ass.

  • @JamesDeal1982
    @JamesDeal1982 2 роки тому

    Why do they cut the cameras of the landing?

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому

      They don't. The satellite link transmitting the video gets interrupted due to vibration from the rocket.

    • @JamesDeal1982
      @JamesDeal1982 2 роки тому

      @@HoudiniGTP ahhh Thanks. I thought it might be that.

  • @infamous387
    @infamous387 2 роки тому

    These are always beautiful videos. It amazes me how we have the technology to launch a rocket and guide it back to earth and land it and reuse it unmanned. I dream of going to space. Was never given the opportunity for a good education. Im doing the best I can with the opportunities given to me but still. Im not asking to fly anything to space just let me ride along.

  • @BARAAGAMER_YT
    @BARAAGAMER_YT 2 роки тому +5

    You're creative keep going✨✨✨✨✨..
    Sender:your brother (Baraa) from Palestine
    🇵🇸🇺🇲

  • @AuditRecon
    @AuditRecon 2 роки тому

    It's too bad We can't save the Merlin Vacuum engine. Always love watching.

  • @pasindutheshan
    @pasindutheshan 2 роки тому +1

    👌 👏

  • @doctordan1668
    @doctordan1668 2 роки тому

    Me: SpaceX continues to outdo themselves. Magnificent.
    JoeB: “There are no unions in SpaceX”

  • @kippamip
    @kippamip 2 роки тому +3

    How come the shuttle and capsules etc go through huge burn ups on re-entry, yet the first stage on the falcon doesn't?

    • @jalbador
      @jalbador 2 роки тому +5

      Shuttles and capsules come in at orbital speeds, 1st stage never makes orbit and also does an entry burn to reduce speed as it enters atmosphere.

    • @kippamip
      @kippamip 2 роки тому +1

      @@jalbador thank you. Just confusing how it all works. Shuttle always had to be right angle to avoid bouncing off the atmosphere. Seems non of this applies to falcon.

    • @Ps..India2024
      @Ps..India2024 2 роки тому +2

      First stage just comes back touching Karman line..moreover it's speed is almost zero once it achieves maximum altitude after MECO..
      on the contrary shuttle or capsules had to enter the armospere almost at the speed of 27000km/hour which itslef is a huge speed.

    • @joebanks3698
      @joebanks3698 2 роки тому +1

      The more pertinent question would be why have you stopped furthering your knowledge and education?

    • @rnichol22
      @rnichol22 2 роки тому +2

      @@joebanks3698 ffs man it may be a young kid give people a break for God's sake

  • @lalmuanthang4729
    @lalmuanthang4729 2 роки тому +1

    Yay🎉🎊🥳

  • @MrAnderson321
    @MrAnderson321 2 роки тому

    Well what a surprise, the feed was cut again. 🙄

  • @Darthbelal
    @Darthbelal 2 роки тому

    Kinda like the first ironclad ships, the first paddle wheel steamers, the first sewing machines, ,the Model T and the first computers SpaceX's method of launching and recovery are a bit awkward and clunky BUT the job is getting done. I'm hoping SpaceX refines its techniques and put manned and unmanned craft higher, faster and farther, there are so many opportunities in deep space waiting for us.......

  • @mrmrsgatdulamukbang5557
    @mrmrsgatdulamukbang5557 2 роки тому

    Ganda cute and 👍

  • @JamesLukensow
    @JamesLukensow 2 роки тому +1

    Anyone see this item fly by the left window, near the left wing of the rocket? Thoughts on what this could be? ua-cam.com/video/ARuElTaiIOU/v-deo.html

    • @la7dfa
      @la7dfa 2 роки тому

      Probably some ice. The lox is cold.

  • @smokingrubber
    @smokingrubber 2 роки тому

    Don't these rockets and fairings have a microSD in them? I'd pay to see the WHOLE launch produced in 4k even if it's months later. The Falcon Heavy launch would be on a constant loop in my office! I'd gather the family around like it's one of those Planet Earth shows.

  • @donaldmorrison3857
    @donaldmorrison3857 2 роки тому

    The real count on landings is 107. Not 100

  • @Sysiu
    @Sysiu 2 роки тому

    Hi, I search this channel hardly but still successfully and come back

  • @100bgeagle
    @100bgeagle 2 роки тому

    Hey SpaceX don't let NASA know how well and cost effective you are!! Watch the swamp monster panic!!

  • @cyankirkpatrick5194
    @cyankirkpatrick5194 2 роки тому

    Just for the UA-cam algorithm.

  • @jerkkub
    @jerkkub 2 роки тому +1

    History being made.

  • @leokimvideo
    @leokimvideo 2 роки тому

    All these landings and still the video issues, no wonder why people say it's photoshopped

  • @SOZDATELYOUTUBE
    @SOZDATELYOUTUBE 2 роки тому

    Как обычно при посадке 1 ступени камера перестаёт работать

  • @NordicSnowhammer
    @NordicSnowhammer 2 роки тому

    SpaceX. The Toyota of space flight. Which is....kind of awkward.

  • @gabrielcarras8335
    @gabrielcarras8335 2 роки тому

    2:39???,,,why??not have more cameras??always is the same🤬

  • @RTX2080TIGAMES
    @RTX2080TIGAMES 2 роки тому +4

    Flat earth believer : Its animation

    • @quantum4089
      @quantum4089 2 роки тому

      IF ONLY THE WHOLE WORLD KNEW. ALL THESE SO-CALLED SPACE COMPANIES WILL LOOK SOOO STUPID. THEY WOULD HAVE TO GIVE ARE TAX MONEY BACK,, THOSE BASTARDS

  • @ginolorenzo9851
    @ginolorenzo9851 2 роки тому

    Isnt Hollywood A.I amazing

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому

      WTF does that even mean?

    • @ginolorenzo9851
      @ginolorenzo9851 2 роки тому

      @@HoudiniGTP It means we been lied too since we walked Into kindergarten telling us we were created by monkeys , big bang theory , dinosaurs , man walking on the moon , and living on a spinning ball

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому

      @@ginolorenzo9851 Oh really? And who exactly told you that "we been lied too"? (It's "to" btw, not "too" genius). And nobody was teaching kids in kindergarten about creation, dinosaurs, moon landings or "spinning balls". That's totally absurd.

    • @ginolorenzo9851
      @ginolorenzo9851 2 роки тому

      @@HoudiniGTP since kindergarten till you became a drug addict In high school

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому

      @@ginolorenzo9851 Sure, whatever kid. Now give your mom her phone back.

  • @danmeek6316
    @danmeek6316 2 роки тому

    The amount of "trash" you can see while the booster is reorienting itself for re-entry is amazing. It's not enough that we pollute the planet, we have to make our orbital plane a junkyard too.

    • @x808drifter
      @x808drifter 2 роки тому

      @@JohnVJay Just ignore the virtue signaling hippies that don't bother to actually try and understand what is really happening.

  • @gerry4915
    @gerry4915 2 роки тому +1

    More litter in orbit....

  • @ytboxeviltwin4081
    @ytboxeviltwin4081 2 роки тому

    They even cut off the live feed before the landing haha. It failed

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 2 роки тому

      How did it fail? You literally see it standing on the droneship.

  • @johnruckman2320
    @johnruckman2320 2 роки тому

    It's funny that the camera doesn't pixelate from vibrations and heat upon liftoff but then pixelates like crazy from the same vibrations and heat when landing. Where's the logic in that?
    Must be a chinese made camera from a sweat shop.

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 2 роки тому

      It's not the cameras, it's the signal from the cameras being interrupted.

  • @srinitaaigaura
    @srinitaaigaura 2 роки тому +1

    Spacex is doing amazing but Starlink will soon run into a major controversy because it will cause tremendous space congestion at this rate. Other countries may not even be able to launch through the narrowing windows.

    • @JJodalen
      @JJodalen 2 роки тому

      No, there’s tons of space up there. It’s not going to be an issue. And Kessler Syndrome is irrelevant as the satellites are in a naturally decaying orbit

  • @evilneko4470
    @evilneko4470 2 роки тому

    1st

  • @caseykang6570
    @caseykang6570 2 роки тому

    2nd

  • @goupigoupi6953
    @goupigoupi6953 2 роки тому

    This is getting a bit boring, can't you guys shift around a little bit the sequence of events to make it more exciting? Like, stage separation first and then liftoff... or something like that.

  • @markyw7954
    @markyw7954 2 роки тому

    Haha that made me chuckle….you lot believe anything shown to you from Spacex

  • @cyankirkpatrick5194
    @cyankirkpatrick5194 2 роки тому +1

    To add to the space junk

    • @TaurusSpace
      @TaurusSpace 2 роки тому +4

      Starlink satellites do not add to space junk after leaving service as a satellite they de orbit

    • @joag1971
      @joag1971 2 роки тому

      @@TaurusSpace it's a troll don't bother with it

  • @energry1988
    @energry1988 2 роки тому

    UFO 5:09

  • @hammah6358
    @hammah6358 2 роки тому +3

    More space trash know when we look up at the stars are we going to see his blurring lights

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому +3

      No, because satellites don't have lights.

    • @hammah6358
      @hammah6358 2 роки тому +1

      @@HoudiniGTP Yes they do reflect light

    • @Mudye
      @Mudye 2 роки тому

      @@hammah6358 not when theyre in the shadow of earth, the only possible chance you could see them is at dawn or dusk

    • @hammah6358
      @hammah6358 2 роки тому +1

      @@Mudye That’s not true I s t a r g a z e every now and then and I see them reflecting sunlight just over the horizon when it’s dark I’ve seen it with my own eyes bright as hell

    • @Mudye
      @Mudye 2 роки тому

      @@hammah6358 im talking about when the satellite is in the shadow of earth, not when theyre near the horizon.

  • @majorkramer
    @majorkramer 2 роки тому

    Need more cameras. What's the big fkg deal?!

  • @mikefarr2679
    @mikefarr2679 2 роки тому

    Just to put more unnecessary 💩 up there,
    When there's hungry & homeless family's down here, waiting to hear,, 5,4,3,2,1- when do I get to eat again, mommy I'm tired..

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 2 роки тому +1

      Go do something about it rather than crying over something irrelevant to that problem.

  • @newoldvideos989
    @newoldvideos989 2 роки тому

    I wonder why, Every time the 1st stage lands, the picture always seems to go out just before touchdown.. Something they don't want to the public to see ?
    Maybe these stages are really crashing, and they don't want to admit it.. Sure seems strange, to be sure.....

    • @Koew
      @Koew 2 роки тому +5

      It was explained already... no they are not fake dont be so naive :)

    • @HoudiniGTP
      @HoudiniGTP 2 роки тому +2

      SpaceX made an entire video showing all of their failed landings. They have nothing to hide.

    • @Mudye
      @Mudye 2 роки тому +1

      they landed one without it cutting out in january

    • @lmao.3661
      @lmao.3661 2 роки тому

      most times. not every time.

    • @hesido
      @hesido 2 роки тому

      They ferry it back for all to see. And it's just the live feed that cuts, they have the landing recorded for every touchdown.

  • @allancopland1768
    @allancopland1768 2 роки тому

    All that space trash... sad!

  • @davidjacobs828
    @davidjacobs828 2 роки тому

    The cgi and holographic projections are getting better ...lol

    • @Ethan_Roberts
      @Ethan_Roberts 2 роки тому

      Where are they in this video?

    • @C00ltronix
      @C00ltronix 2 роки тому

      You know what a holograph is? No? I thought so.

    • @davidjacobs828
      @davidjacobs828 2 роки тому

      @@C00ltronix
      There's no such thing as a holograph .
      It's a hologram .
      These sfx shows use holographic projection to beguile the gullible while these charlatans like nasa ,spacex ,the esa etc etc.steal billions of dollars of tax payers money .
      The more intelligent amongst the population see through this fakery and are asking the most important question of all...
      "WHAT have these con artists really been spending all the space budgets on since the 1950s"
      ?
      One of the many nefarious black projects financed using these stolen trillions is called
      Project Blue beam .
      This technology allows full 3d holograms to be projected onto any area .these projected,moving holograms look solid ,look real and
      These ridiculous backwards landing rockets are the latest example. Earlier examples include the non existent planes allegedly hitting the wtc on 911.
      Now ,I suggest you educate yourself before replying in future .

    • @davidjacobs828
      @davidjacobs828 2 роки тому

      @@Ethan_Roberts
      Where are what ethan ?
      If you're referring to camera cuts there are none. The viewer filming this is filming what he's seeing .the whole thing is a blue beam holographic projection. The tech is improving all the time. Thanks for taking the time to reply ethan .
      Feel free to ask any questions.

    • @davidjacobs828
      @davidjacobs828 2 роки тому

      I apologise ethan ,there are many cuts in this blatant cgi video..
      I thought you were referring to a different video filmed on a spectator's camera.

  • @malkauczok66
    @malkauczok66 2 роки тому +1

    I say bullshit, Yet again the landing was missed, Watching this live I could have bet my pension that the camera feed would be lost..... EVERY time, come on, they can land on a tiny ship but not video it live from a ship nearby....? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

    • @hesido
      @hesido 2 роки тому +4

      A few good times the live feed did not cut, and they have non-live recordings of all these events. They send an empty ship, and return with a big a*s rocket. What do you think is being faked here?

    • @itsmeagain7825
      @itsmeagain7825 2 роки тому +3

      You can go and watch the land landings yourself

    • @RTXti-ld7dx
      @RTXti-ld7dx 2 роки тому +1

      No kidding!! If they are so “Fake” go watch them in real time and then FINALLY u will believe it. Pathetic, grow up.