See Delta IV Heavy's final launch in amazing rocket cam footage
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 кві 2024
- The United Launch Alliance's (ULA's) Delta IV heavy-lift rocket launched the NROL-70 mission from Space Launch Complex-37 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on April 9 at 12:53 p.m. EDT (1653 GMT). Full Story: www.space.com/final-delta-4-h...
It was the final launch for the historic rocket. See the rocket cam footage here.
Credit: ULA - Наука та технологія
Watching Earth from the "outside" is humbling.
Not for many. Internet has taken wonder, humility, humanity, and blended it all into an apathetic, asocial mush of ‘memes’ and permanently ‘ironic’ cynicism.
@@tubecated_development speak for yourself
@@tonyperdicou7389 no, I’m speaking for those many I encounter on the Internet
@@tubecated_development Well, not to mention the Grifters who convinced them it's all a lie.
@@MyOuterHaven It sounds so rediculous...but so is this whole thing we call Life.
But that ignores the Math and visual proof we can do ourselves, lol.
5:40, the way the extra nozzle fits in to place is really cool
i wish the atlas version of the RL-10 had the extension, seeing it deploy is really cool
I guess having a longer interstage was out of the question?
Ok thanks for the dad comment
@allEyezOnDelphi you are welcome son
@@josephastier7421 The shorter a rocket's inter stage is the better. Long inter stages tend to be really heavy, which lowers the amount of payload you can lift. Also because inter stages are hollow, longer inter stages tend to endure significantly higher loads and stresses during launch making them weaker than shorter inter stages.
WOAH actual camera footage and not animation !!! I knew this could be done !
It only took till very end but we got there!
It's been done for ages. 🤦
Stop watching flat earther channels.
🤦🤡
The Apollo 11 had cameras inside of the stages that filmed separations... then ejected and parachuted back to earth and were recovered... That was on July 16th 1969... there was no desire to "film " from the outside due to obvious restrictions and limitations...
Who would have thunk that they had CGI...........back in the 1960's huh?
Damn boi! It ain't flat after all ....
The hell, you say!
Well who knew? 😂
Its thick, boi! We all knew it!
That’s because this is CGI to make you think it’s round. Wake up.
EDIT: FFS please stop trying to fight me in the comments. This is a JOKE. Surely nobody thinks this is serious, or that the earth is flat 🤦♂️
Ok, grab a small ball. Like a golf ball or something. Find a flat surface of 6 feet or longer. Bring your eye down to where you can no longer see the top surface. Now roll the ball and witness what happens. That's right, you just witnessed how the sun sets and rises on a plane. In this scale. you don't have to contend with atmospheric contamination which makes the atmosphere itself one giant lens that maintains its apparent size. Too bad the globe theorists failed basic geometry.
Now grab some iron, a magnet, some metal wire, a metal stand, and a torch. First, wrap the wire around the iron. Next, tie the wire to the stand or hang it from something so it can be heated with the torch. Attach the magnet to the iron. Now pay attention to what happens when you heat the iron until it glows red. That's right, the magnet drops! Congratulations! You just proved what science claims the Earth's core is and how it works wrong. Too bad the globe theorists weren't informed about the Curie point.
This one will vary depending on the sink design. Most noticeable in round sinks, though it will work in all of them. Ok, grab 2 full glasses of water. Go to your sink and put 1 glass on each side. Now take 1 glass and pour it on the left front wall and watch it drain clockwise. Take the other glass and pour it on the right front wall and watch it drain counterclockwise. The left rear wall will also drain counterclockwise while the right rear wall will drain clockwise. Congratulations! You just witnessed both Coriolis effects in the same hemisphere! Too bad the globe theorists didn't understand momentum very well.
Plane Earth class dismissed!
I was lucky to have worked on the construction of launch facility 37 for delta4 heavy as a union pipe fitter summer of 2000.coolest job I ever had..I would even say it was the pinnacle of my career.
4:00 Look how fast that booster falls away even though its still tumbling forward, the rocket just leaves it in the dust. Really shows the insane velocity that thing has at high altitudes. That booster would still have been tumbling forward as fast as a bullet even though it was jettisoned
Makes you wonder how engineers tune the areo without testing to have them not bounce back into each other after they've gone!
@@actually5004 They just burn up in the atmosphere so it doesn't matter if they hit each other i guess
Nasa uses green screens with toy rockets to film these fakes, like Hollywood films.
Wake up, space is a big HOAX!!!!
The way it turned just after the booster disappeared into the distance…was straight out of Star Wars😎🇺🇸
I remember watching the first Delta IV Heavy launch online back in 2004, thinking about how cool it was that I could watch a live event on the internet! Today, 20 years later, Delta IV is no more.
They really call them the "strap-ons"?!
Hey, for maximum "thrust", you know it! 😆🍆
Strap-on boosters.
Frighteningly large strap-ons
Yep. "Strap ons", "Strap on solids" "Strap on boosters"
Oh yes, massive strap-ons, with no sense of embarrassment!
really great in flight sequences !
Men this is so freaking cool
Tag all your flat earth friends😂
Imagine keeping flat-earthers as friends.
I correct them when they suggest something so rediculous.
Sorry, this won't dissuade flat earthers! The masters of nuh uh.
Yea, they will just say C G I.
I really believe flat Earthers know damn well the Earth isn't flat, they do what they do for attention seeking.
they're great at launching rockets...not so accomplished at setting a microphone's noise gate threshold level though !
Amazing 🎉
Truly amazing! Thanks for posting this!! 😁 😮🥰🤩
Wow spectacular footage! Most amazed at lack of vibration! 👌👍😃😃
What an Iconic rocket!
Gonna miss the Delta rockets
Beautiful
Que loucura de imagem linda! Surreal. Fantástico! Muita qualidade!
Beautiful!
Shame the audio sounds like the commentary is on the rocket. Footage is great.
Why is the audio transmission from the ground so garbled ?
Thats what im thinking! How come i can speak to people on the other side of the world through discord on my iphone 6 loud and clear but literal space agencies have sound quality like it was the 1950s 😅At this point they gotta be doing it cause it feels cool 😂
Maybe they are sending the audio to the rocket and back to earth just to add a geek factor. 😋
There is no audio transmission from the rocket. It's just a bad recording from mission control.
Probably the settings on the Vox mic 🎤
Wow a rocket that works and doesn’t tumble out of control..
Right after they reached 100 kilometers, I noticed the struts and side tank started to turn black. Which I know will sound dumb but is that radiation burning, or could you explain why this "what seems to me as an atmospheric thing" happened in what I am assuming is out of the atmosphere?
I'm curious about this too. Maybe there is still "some" atmosphere up there and with the increased velocity at higher altitude maybe the charring is caused by some friction with the very thin atmosphere?
At 100 km there’s still a bit of atmosphere left. The radiation levels are far too low to cause blackening at that rate.
I noticed SpaceX and its competitors have way better video quality.. this feels like 2010.
When was it?
Makes me proud to be a human.
7:06 What is with all the fire between/above the engines? Is that normal?
Hydrogen gas residue
Aerodynamic dead zone where the unignited gases linger and burn off
Yes; it's normal, and the Hydrogen gas burning before liftoff is deliberate. It avoids a potentially explosive situation, similar to what SpaceX encountered with at least one of their early prototype Starship launches.
What’s the black shape/debris passing through at 0.12 ish??
I heard this yesterday!
It's amazing how the booster quickly disappears into the distance!
UA-cams AI bots are going to struggle with what's said here, strapon separation is going to ping off
I sensed as slight excitement in the narrators voice every time he called the boosters "strap ons".
2:30 The connection hardware starts to show aerodynamic heating effects
Cool!
Let's see 'em land it like SpaceX!
Constant improvement is not United Alliance culture. Will be challenging.
NASA opted not to reuse the craft. It was deemed cheaper to simply make new ones.
Rest assured NASA could land and reuse their crafts.
Elon / space X has done nothing special at all.
@@walsterdoomit They did: Space Shuttle. The difference is that the Shuttle took about billion dollars to service after each flight, and SpaceX do it without any freeloaders taking advantage of them financially.
@RWBHere they opted to not reuse boosters.
But you can change the topic if you like.
I for one trust nasa over musk the taxpayer funded freeloader.
Elon is a con.
Look how fast the side boosters disappear when they throttle back up
funny how flat earthers dont show up at all when theres an inarguable video that shows the earth as a globe hahaha.
May be an optical affect but doesn't seem like much of a gravity turn after liftoff. Perhaps it's just the perspective of the camera view?
Geostationary orbit, so slower gravity turn.
It starts at 4:08, and is very obvious.
I thought I was looking at Minmus from KSP from thumbnail for this video...
Weird how the center connection to the booster started turning black around 5:30 in the video as it was approaching the Karmen Line. It almost looked like the paint was burning from an internal heating element in the connecting point getting too hot. Anyone know what that’s about???
It was way too high up for the burning to be caused by wind resistance.
That would make sense: That connection point is attached to cryogenic tanks at both ends, you’d want to make sure it’s not frozen shut when you jettison the boosters.
Sem palavras
nice.
What happens to the strap on boosters after jettison? Do they burn up on re-entry, splash into the ocean or orbit the earth as space junk?
Fall into the ocean. No where near fast enough to orbit or burn up.
@@wally7856 Cheers for that. Gee you wouldn’t want to be sailing along and get clobbered by one of the boosters.
@@OurWorldbyDronein4K They have an ocean exclusion zone for boats so they don't get clobbered.
I guess the technology has not caught up to the audio systems yet. It sounds like a drive through
It's ok, at least it goes better than most people in Kerbal Space Program.
But really this is cool, there's something amazing in seeing the surface of Earth further and further away.
"We have ignition. We have liftoff." Thank heavens for the narration, since we could see those things for ourselves.
that's live from the control room; the voice you hear is from somebody monitoring datas, not this video. Ask if you don't know, think before comenting.
What is shooting off in the background from earth at around 4:50 ?
Probably debris glinting
There....take that Mr. Gravity !
(would be nice to see altitude and speed displayed...and in mph and feet.)
5:50 - Hey flerfs ... look at that curve.
I can already see all the flurfs comments.
Why didn't we see the port strappong rolling away with starboard.
So what happens to those boosters when separated??
Splash, splash!
"cleared the tower...." meanwhile back in the sixties....as evidenced by the audio feed quality also...
Perfect Flight. Perfect Video. Choppy Audio. I do not understand.
5:42 That extendo nozzle is so strange.
Seems odd there is so much random flames between the three nozzles at liftoff.
Can we get a forward viewing camera
Why? When you want to have that view, just look up, nothing to see there. However, here a video of a Space Shuttle launch with a camera viewing forward
ua-cam.com/video/zhuGwQq7qZk/v-deo.html
Looks like uncontrolled burning around the engine nozzles shortly after liftoff..?
Come on guys... you can launch a rocket into space but you can't get good audio recordings?!?! WTF
That's some really crappy audio there, Lou. What gives?
Why is this the last launch of this type? I can’t seem to find anything about this.
ULA have a new rocket, it’s called Vulcan. It has already launched its first payload.
"Strap-on Sally chased them down the alley, they feared for their behind`s"
Strap on separation. Could be an issue…
WOW 🎉👌👍🙂
why a big shadow appears on the earth 1:27 and then it fades away 2:14 booster bracket
bottom left ??? 🤔
Shadow of the exhaust plume.
Sure was an awful lot of fire coming out of the sides of the rocket motors, above the nozzles.
Thats an aerodynamic dead zone where unignited gasses build up and burn
Do all those jettisoned parts burn up in our atmosphere? Or do they just circle the earth forever?
$10,000 coffee maker budget friendly👌🏿
Weird how it didn't smash into the "Firmament" huh?
Heres the "one video to space, just one, that they CAN'T do"
😂
They'll just shout nuh uh and cgi and round lens or round eyeball or round magical magnetic something...
Wasn't every Delta IV launch a final launch?
Interesting how they call the liftoff engines "strap-ons".
Strap-on, strap-on, strap-on, strap-on,................
I wonder what the Wright brothers would have said?
Orville: "HOLY ! ..."
Wilbur: " ... FUCK !"
That's nothing, we put a man in the air and landed him safely.
@@skipsassy1 Daily, on scheduled flights
Didnt get to see the actual light up at the start which was a shame.
You didn't watch the whole video. They showed light up.
21st century rocket technology. 19th century audio.
We've become greater than Dinosaurs lol 😂❤
So...Rockets dont have to explode or tear up the Launchpad? Let that sink in.
Well, but watch one of meanwhile 280 successful landings of SpaceX Falcon rockets to realize, that rockets don't have to be thrown away but can be reused.
@@sebastiannolte1201 I realized that about 30 years ago when it was done the first time. Called DC-X.
@@sebastiannolte1201They get reused every time they don’t explode. What’s the score?
@@tubecated_development Do you mean how often the landings fails? That doesn't happen often, here all flights of 2023. All are green:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#2023
We can send incredible technology to space and even beyond our own solar system, but we can't clearly record simple voice audio.
'
this rocket need to add FINS on the bottoem near engines
6:15 I have never heard counts be so off
mereka bilang "final" bukan "terakhir"
Ok why is there fire between the 3 boosters that should only occur out of the exhaust sections.
Was wondering the same thing........
The fire between boosters is caused by vented H2 igniting upon engine startup. This we are told is a feature of the Delta 4 Heavy, not a bug,
4:48, electrostatic discharge or what?
It was so loud!!!
I’m glad the strap ons worked well.
Ah, so that’s what happens when a strap-on’s max thrust has been used up
I'm not sure I feel comfortable hearing "strap-on" in this launch! lol ;)
0:13 🤔
5300 miles per hour man they are just goosin it
Strap ons????....can't they come up with a different term? Those wacky space folks....
Unknown debris 0:13
Why is this it's final launch?
It’s being replaced with a new rocket, the Vulcan.
Awesome footage!!!
Side Boosters, Solid rocket side boosters, they are not strap ons
Technically
Nice try, but you’re not going to convince anyone here that those are anything other than strap-ons.
Not solid rocket boosters..all 3 are liquid fuel.. liquid hydrogen and oxygen.....but strap ons is still a strange name..lol.
They built them.. They can call THEM WHATEVER THEY WANT..
Now throw a few bux at the crappy audio
Image quality ✅
Perfect angles ✅
Microphone in mouth ✅
6:02 Everything looking…. Ugh
YALL BETTER WATCH YALL HEADS ON EARTH THAT BOOSTERS COMIN
The strap-ons lol
Finally something else in the news besides Donald Trump. Very cool video thanks for sharing
"Strap-ons". They chose that term. On purpose.
Where's all the satellites, stars & breaking the atmosphere?
We’re looking at daylit Earth, so the exposure time is on the order of 1/1000 second. Try taking photos of stars and satellites with that exposure time: you will get completely dark photos.
satellites are hundreds and thousands of kilometers away, why should you see them? And what does "breaking the atmosphere" mean? It launches in the atmosphere and goes up. And the atmosphere just get thinner and thinner with the altitude
A vacuum requires a solid barrier
@@paulbutler9719 LOL, just spitting out the typical nonsense, so parroting what you have seen some where. What's comes next, that water always find its level?
Haven't you really notice, that the air pressure becomes thinner fluently when you go higher? I mean, you easily can feel and measure that. Before GPS , altimeters only worked by measuring the air pressure. So we have an air pressure of 1013 hPa at sea level. At the top of Mount Everest only 325 hPa. So how can 1013 hPa exist next to 325 hPa without a solid barrier? You don't have a problem with that? At 20 km it is 78 hPa, at 50 km it is 165 Pa, at 100 km it is 0.3 Pa, halfway between moon and earth 0.000000001 Pa, deep in outer space it is 0.000000000000 Pa. So where should that barrier be?
@@paulbutler9719 No, it doesn’t. It requires a physical barrier OR a force that prevents gases from flowing into the vacuum. Gravity provides that force for planetary atmospheres.
“Why” is aviation audio such complete garbage. What’s that whirring noise, why does the mic key scratch so hard and clip the call-outs, what the hell is “squelch” and why are the recordings so impossible to understand. Any other radio broadcast seems to care about transmitting understandable audio, the aviation industry despises that and I wonder how come.