My aunt saw the CGI Lion King and talked about how good it was and asked if I saw it. I said no, I saw the original which I heard was better so there was no reason for me to see it. She continued to say how this one was better because its so lifelike. I asked if she saw teh original and she said with derision" No, thats a cartoon". There is still a bias against animation. That the subject matter cant be as serious as something "live action".
@omegaman2846 But it's live action. Now you don't have to feel guilty for watching it as an adult. It's funny how in this year I've learned why adults are miserable as I worked a 20 hour job while living from paycheck to paycheck in a boarding home because I couldn't afford to rent an apartment. I'm tempted to think misery is meant to be the base state of adults to keep them compliant to a stagnant society. Hence why we get remakes and dismissal of new ideas or creativity.
At the very best, all they will be able to do is make it "almost" as good as the original. As long as it's not "awful" it will probably make a crap ton of money (a lot of people like my kids would probably willingly take their kids to see it - even though it would be a lot cheaper to just borrow my blu-ray of the original and watch that).
The question is would it really kill you to have a favorite movie that is available to watch in 2 mediums? It feels like unnecessary hate and rejection if you're eating good as a HTTYD fan. The director of the film even said the trailer was purposely adapting 1-1 shots but the actual film will be something new and darker than the original.
@gamewriteeye769 I don't care for darker. The books weren't darker. It's diverging even further from the source material on greater scope that the original. Why are you making a grim dark adaptation for a series written primarily for 10 year olds in the first place? I have no interest in this project at all.
🤣🤣🤣brooooo I was legit starting to wonder if something was wrong with me, because I feel like I'm in a room full of people cheering, while I'm the only one not getting what there is to cheer about. As I've said repeatedly.... The last movie to the series came out only 5 years ago..... Are we actually serious?
Hey, alteori! I love your channel! And also, no you're not alone. I honestly thought I was alone seeing everyone else's reactions to this garbage. Imo, toothless looks horrible. And I think you said this in your video, and I agree, the trailer looked fan made. Like, everything from the costumes, to the casting, to the setting, to the CGI all looked like a college/fan made project. I think if people wanna see convincingly real looking dragons they should just go watch game of thrones. (I personally don't like got, but there's no denying the dragons there were impressive.)
This actually looks good tho. The problem was it that disney had OBVIOUS DISDAIN for their original works and were "fixing" them😂. Y'all are the SAME twitter people...just on the haterade side💀
@@no.1spidey-fan182 no it looks shit. It's a shot for shor remake of a film that already exists only done in an inferior medium. Hell the film isn't even good as a live action remake. If they wanted to make it into live action they needed to change Toothless into an actual photorealistic dragon instead of keeping his babyish cartoon design. But no that would require actually creating something new instead of copy pasting something they already did beat for beat like a decade ago.
@blakea.wittenberg5685 Ah yes because people just LOOOOVED when Disney did that in the Lion King remake where they made the animals photorealistic...swear to God, its damned if you do and damned if you don't...just can't please you people💀 Someone literally made a fan edit of the Lion King live action and gave the characters their cartoonish proportions...comment secrion loved it🤣 And its "shot for shot"...so? It if aint broke don't fix it🤣. They learnes from Disney's mistakes. When disney made all those changes every single time y'all had nothing but salt for them which actuslly made sense. Now y'all just want to complain for things not worth complaining about. Life must be good if THIS is what gets to you💀 This is legitimately the ONLY franchise Dreamworks even has that can be work in a live action. "Inferior medium" you act like How to Teain your Dragon broke the animation mold or something like Spiderverse and Toy Story and Incredibles back in the dsy...it DIDN'T. When you think of GOOD artstyles...HTTYD is NOT the FIRST, SECOMD or THIRD thing on your mind😂
But have you noticed, Disney has been losing money on their remakes since “Beauty and the Beast” and “The Lion King”. The fad wore out its welcome over five years ago.
@@ChienaAvtzonthat’s around the time they got lazy and started making shot for shot remakes of the animated movies. Prior to that the live action movies at least were reimagined versions of the originals
Same. The only good "live action" remake (aside from Cinderella because I didn't see it) was The Jungle Book because they blended the Disney story and elements from the book.
@elcaballeronyc No, they weren't lol. Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin were basically shot for shot with a couple added elements to make them longer. In all of these movies, they oddly always make the villains different and more lame too.
@wesmcinerny4524 Cute that you think anyone will hate watch this when the reaction to the trailer is an overwhelmingly positive one. No, people will see it. They WILL like it, and we'll get more live action remakes.
This video was quite cathartic, it's sometimes hard to not feel like a cynical buzzkill when everyone around you is cheering and you just ask yourself "What the F is wrong with you people?" 😂
Nostalgia is a powerful tool. Unfortunately we have now become the boomers who can't let go of their youth. Nostalgia is good and fun, but it has gotten completely out of control and there is nothing for the new generation. Also its official, Hollywood and the internet have caused Jester's brain to crack! She'll be in Arkham Asylum in a straight jacket screaming "IT’S THE SAME THING!" and "WHY ARE YOU CLAPPING!" in no time!
Dang dude, you have a point. We accuse older generations of trying to relive their youth again, yet we are desperate not to leave it at all. We need to let go. We need something new. The actual children of today need something new.
@@sammysstopmotionoas1996 Nothing for this new generation? I disagree. My friend's kids are currently having a dope childhood with alot of new animes, mangas, webtoons & K-dramas.
Isn't Toothless's design in the original book completely different? Why is this remake about the animated adaptation and not the original book? Seem parasitic and lazy to copy and paste something just because it worked in the past instead of being daring and original.
I really hate the way Hollywood treats animation and video games. They’ll really look so one of the greatest trilogies of all time (HTTYD) and go, “that’s cool. BUT WAIT TILL YOU SEE OURS”. And it’s sad how people lose their minds over shot for shot stuff that doesn’t even look that impressive, man. I’m glad I’m not the only one who saw the reactions and was like “god, you’re all kinda idiots”. I always say we’re the reason Hollywood is the way it is. Not Hollywood itself. It’s our fault. 😂😂😂 EDIT: BRUH I’M SO GLAD YOU MENTIONED THAT CHILDREN ARE BASICALLY GROWING UP WITH NOTHING ORIGINAL. We had Spy Kids, The Incredibles, High School Musical, Catch That Kid, Bridge To Terabithia, Narnia, etc. They’ll really have nothing new and classic. It’s so sad, dude.
I swear barely anything original has been made within the last 10-15 years by now. At least nothing resembling a proper children's story that inspires them. Spy Kids was ridiculous, but it was imaginative.
The thing that actually makes me furious about all of this is that it feeds into and strengthens western culture's bias against animation as an art form. Animation is still largely seen as "lesser" than live-action. I've known people who have to be all but pressured into watching an animated movie--even if they think the plot sounds interesting! And even when they do end up enjoying a good animated movie (such as HTTYD), there's that underlying sentiment of "Well, it was ALMOST perfect, except for the fact that it wasn't live-action (or hyper-realistic uncanny valley CGI pretending to be live-action)." And this ticks me off more than just about anything in the world because it's basically the same thing as looking at a beautiful painting and going "Well, this is good, but it'd be better if it was a photograph." Animation is not the cheaper, easier alternative to live-action. It's actually much more expensive and time-consuming. The artists who love this medium and choose to tell stories with it deserve to be respected and held in the same (or heck, even HIGHER) regard as the greatest live-action filmmakers.
@@cynicalperson161not even given blonde hair even though I’ve seen people say she’s naturally blonde 😂 at some point you have to wonder if the people making this are just having a laugh.
@FilmnerdTV, they could make a song titled “Only the Strong can Belong”, and “Becoming the Hard Way” and “Hail Barbaria”. But that would require being closer to the books
THANK YOU!!! I've been screaming the same thing! I'm beyond annoyed that it takes this little for people to be pleased. Nobody will ever convince me this remake was remotely necessary.
It didn’t need a film adaptation, which barely scratched the surface of the books, so it would just make you wonder, why tie it to the books in the first place?
this remake exists purely for 2 reasons 1. nostalgia money 2. it's for boomers who liked httyd but feel ashamed of watching an animated movie the funniest part is the only REAL appeal this movie could've had was seeing the dragons in a more realistic light. But toothless looks just like his cartoony self with a realistic texture pack. He was not meant to be realistic
I'll never understand why people want live actions, specially ones that are just a copy of an animated project. I had someone in all seriousness say that's interesting to see how the story will look with real actors and was like "No. Why would it when it already works perfectly in animation?" And some defend this by saying that they never got to experience the movies in theatre, but now they can... 😐
I don't mind remakes & reboots. If it's good, I'll enjoy it. If it's bad, I'll just move on. As an anime fan, I love the live action Rurouni Kenshin films.
I don’t mind live action movies my biggest debate is, is it better than the cartoon probably not but I know the cartoon lion King is better than the live action one then again we have Mufasa coming out but I never watched the animated how to train your Dragon I think I watched it once when it first came out and that was it.
I think a lot of people like to see the contrasts. People like exploring the protagonists relationship in all the versions of "Mo Dao Zu Shi" as well as their special song.
You don’t know how pissed I was when I was trying to look up a reaction to the trailer that did not like it like myself but every trailer reaction was just everyone being happy and I thought I was going crazy 😂😂😂
I literally called out this movie, and all of a sudden some rando on Facebook accused me of being a pedo, just because I made fun of his precious live action remake. This is a cult at this point.
The irony that this is likely projection.😂 Wood Chippers really need to be funded by our taxes and given to every single person. The problem will eventually be solved.
@@atobosrolloutyoutube7886 You’d be surprised if the whack job fans of kids movies/kids shows…remember, the broney community has its fair share of psychos
I lost when you yelled out "It's the same SHOT!" Like good lord! I've never seen you blow up like this. Not only that, I had to do a double take cause it almost sounds like you said "shit". That's how surprised I was listening to you yell. Back on topic, I didn't know there was a live action HtTYD trailer till I saw videos of people showing Toothless in live action CGI and I said to myself "Wait. This is live action? He looks the same only with a little more detail." And that's it.
This reminds me of how Marvel and DC have these little reference points just to go "here! are you pacified now nerds?" Then gets back to being inaccurate or lame. Usually signified by having the characters tear down the costume or mention how outdated/too much is it. Some of them not even putting them on but relegate it to the background as a stationary prop.
What's worse is the new norm No Way Home set up, where it used to be those easter eggs/references were not easily noticed by general audiences, they were there for hardcore nerds to nerd out over, examples I can think of are in the first Iron Man Tony's Mark III started out gold on the monitor, then he told J.A.R.V.I.S. to throw a little hot rod red in there, and if you know the comics, you know that the Mark I was gray, the Mark II was gold, and then the Mark III had the traditional Iron Man color scheme, another good example is the use of The Lonely Man from the 70's The Incredible Hulk series with Bill Bixby and Lou Ferrigno being used in a scene in The Incredible Hulk film with Ed Norton, and it's used to convey the emotions that the tragedy of Bruce's life should have, but with No Way Home's success, now Hollywood thinks, "Oh if I just quote the stuff from the past or recreate shots from the past that's instant cash"
THANK YOU!!! I honestly thought i was going crazy with how many people were so excited. When i saw the trailer, i screamed 'NOOOO!' so loud. I wanted to throw my phone. I dont want this, i don't need this.
What's worse is that this is a shot-for-shot live action remake of the original 2010 animated film. I rather just watch the original instead of the remake.
NOT YOU TOO DREAMWORKS I THOUGHT YOU WERE BETTER THAN THIS isnt their whole company built on making fun of disney anyway btw thanks for giving me the vent ive been holding in
Oh I'm not the only one, thank god 🤣 I felt so weird seeing that trailer because like, sure, looks nice- but the fact that Toothless looks exactly like the og made me break all immersion I had. It honestly made the actor look like the weird one out, I'm not sure I can watch this movie and not think I could be watching the animated one (that still holds up pretty nicely)
Watch it get nominated for awards that Hollywood would never give the original a chance for because "animation is for kids" and "just something you chuck on to keep the kids quiet"...
They can feed us the exact same thing with a fresh coat of CGI, bland acting, and gray colors because our OH SO PRECIOUS NOSTALGIA fills in the blanks. And we will not remember it existed it in a month. Happened with the Lion King, and it will happen again with this one.
I think what's worth getting worked up about is the millions/billions of dollars being spent on all this B grade slop when that money could be spent on anything else.
I watched the trailer here on YT and when I scrolled down to the comment section this was the first thing I saw: "An animated version of this would be so cool." I agree. No one needs this "live action" version.
Well you see, kids are going to grow up with these live action remakes... And then in 20 years from now they're going to get super excited to watch the ANIMATED remakes of the live action ones, and it will all come full circle.
Yeah I saw this trailer and I swear most comments were like wow looks good! And I'm over here like "WTF people this looks dumb as fk and not NEEDED!!!"
The CGI Toothless is still technically animated, But at least it looks good, unlike the Minecraft film or the CGI in any of the Live action Disney movies
Bless you for your good old fashioned COMMON SENSE!!! Yes! And I absolutely agree with you! The clapping seals thing almost had me falling off my chair laughing. 😂 Okay...we can both go take a rest now. 😂😂🤣
You know this video was going to be good with that title. And if people have learned nothing after the Disney Live Action remakes by now, then this title is deserved PS damn and people thought Jeater got mad with what hollywood does with Harley Quinn, but this might have cracked her.
7:35, true. And it wasn’t a close adaptation at all. Speaking as a fan of the books, if the new movies were truer to the text adaptations of them then I would be all for it. That’s not what the trailer advertises at all. It offers a recreation of the 2010 film
This is how I felt when The Force Awakens was announced and everyone cheered. I was in a shop, and on the radio the presenter said that every Star Wars fan was excited for there being a new film, and I thought - I'm not, what are they doing, leave it alone, you can only make it worse!
Yep. Giving it a pass. I'm appalled that the studios would stoop so low as to repeat a live action version of a great animated feature. It's like Dreamworks learned NOTHING from Disney. They have so much stored in the vaults that they could take a chance on, but no.... just gives us more repeats. JFC....
If disney wants to please older fans, why not spend 1k-20k on a small project that re-imagines' an older animated shot or scene, but in real life? It could be used as a promotional piece for an _original_ upcoming movie that can be used to showcase their creative potential rather than spending 100 million dollars on a flop that no one asked for.
CGI Toothless doesn't seem too different from animated Toothless but obviously animated Toothless takes the cake because he looks more akin to a cute goofy cat just by his eyes while the other one looks only like just a big lizard.
How to Train Your Dragon is very nearly a perfect movie. At best, at the very absolute best, if absolutely everything from the acting to the directing to the music works PERFECTLY, the BEST you can do is _equal_ it. You literally CAN'T do better than the original (by definition - it's a _perfect_ movie). So, you're most likely going to make a movie that isn't as good. And, even if you do equal the REAL movie, it will always only be a derivative copy of the original. But, as you mention, the point of this movie is feed people member berries and to be a ($250 million commercial) for Universal Studios HTTYD ride. And, to that end, it will probably be quite successful.
Yeah, I had the same reaction. Read the comments below the official trailer on YT and everyone was like "Wow, this looks so cool" "Hype" "Great to have Gerald Butler back as Stoic". I have three possible explenations: -Bunch of twenty somethings. Most of them say they saw this film as a kid, so perhaps they have not been burned yet with life action remakes as we older ones have. -The trailer included interviews iwth the director and staff and apparently its mostly the same creative team, including the same director, and in the interview, he talks very passionatly about how he wants to make this movie. So my guess is that many believe him and that this one will actuall be good. -Its not Disney, and apparently Disney is the only company that can hoark up life - action remakes.
Yeah, all these films as a kid and love them. And I would also do chronological timeline from all the TV shows and Netflix shows to prepare for the third movie. It was fantastic. But I’m hype for this live action remake, especially since the original creator still involved and some people from the animated movie reprise their role
Universal has done some live action remakes in the past. They did a couple of live action films of "The Flintstones" and one of "How The Grinch Stole Christmas."
@@atobosrolloutyoutube7886 you sweet summer child. Look at it in comparison to the original. (And yes you can compare because both are CGI.) "Live action" toothless has nothing inside his eyes when you look at how the original looked and behaved. The original animation had so much life and vibrancy. Whereas the that new thing looks like how I do just after waking up. Lol
When I saw it announced on a public FB post the other day, I commented "I just don't understand why we need this," and *hundreds* of people responded to me. Some agreed, some said it was a money grab or that it was about Epic Universe (okay, yeah), but a lot of people said they really want it, called me a Karen, said I'm not the target audience, and verbally attacked me for questioning it. I think the original trilogy is near perfect. I think these remakes are lifeless when you compare them to the expressiveness of the original animation. I just don't get why people keep consuming this stuff.
I feel you, girl! I'm so done with this shiz too! I mean, who care anymore and they also race swap characters every single time to score diversity points which is also annoying. I wouldn't mind as much if they didn't do it every single time!
Haha! I love the hysteria over how insane you thought the reaction was, kinda looks like this broke you just a bit 😂 I grew up in the 90's, live action remakes were a thing then too. The ones that stood out to me were The Flinstones, The Jungle Book (with Jason Scott Lee that had real animals that didn't talk) and 101 Dalmations. I remember being really hyped to see them because it felt like the stories and characters that you knew and loved "coming to life". Animation feels almost like a dream when you're a kid, whereas live action movies felt more real, and when you see an animated and live action version of the same thing, it felt like the live action version was the "real", "grownup" version. I felt the same way when watching the very first TMNT movie for the first time, after having watched the cartoon show, same with Ghostbusters; in that situation, the live action versions actually did come out first. It just inspires curiosity more than anything. Of course as an adult, I now feel differently. When you realise that animation isn't just for kids and in fact many of the animated shows and films you grew up loving are still great in adulthood, you realise you don't need it to be live action to enjoy it. You also realise that whether its live action or animated, all film is artifice; yes it can be more easy to relate if something has real humans in it, but animation has that power and more, and considering how many big movies now are more than half CGI, seems like filmmakers realise that there's only so much you can achieve in live action. So I think these remakes will definitely have a greater appeal to kids than adults, even though they're marketed to adults who grew up with the originals. But of course it'll be the originals that'll end up enduring, which is already happening with the disney remakes, even though they of course all have their fans. HTTYD will be the same I imagine, coz like you, when I saw this teaser, all I saw was the original but with real humans in silly costumes, and a CGI dragon that looks almost identical to what was already an exaggerated cartoon design, totally out of place in live action; it would be like if they manipulated the Hiccup actor's features to be more like the animated version with massive eyes, large head, pencil neck and extra thin, gangly limbs, that would be ridiculous because of course the features were exaggerated in the animation because its ANIMATION! They didn't even attempt to create something that might pass off as a real dragon; yes okay, its fantasy so there are no rules for this, but even something like Smaug in The Hobbit or Draco from Dragonheart, both very expressive, talking dragons in live action, had designs that felt like they belonged in the real world. That's what live action remakes should be doing, translate and change to fit the medium. The designs in the original HTTYD were very stylized as all Dreamworks movies are, they fit that particular aesthetic. The live action doesn't look stylised from what I can tell, with the real actors, real costumes and sets, location shooting, the dragons should reflect that. But instead they're capitalising on nostalgia and fan service, it looks like a fan movie, not something you'd think a serious filmmaker would do. Early days though, we'll have to wait and see. But till then, in my opinion, live action remakes that cater only for fans of the originals are just trying to live up to a child's impression of what "real" and "grownup" mean. Fine for kids, but for the rest of us we should be demanding more.
That is not how I reacted at all, i was disappointed and disheartened... it's not how it's the same that makes me angry, it's how it's different. They need to make new things, not remake old things.
My aunt saw the CGI Lion King and talked about how good it was and asked if I saw it. I said no, I saw the original which I heard was better so there was no reason for me to see it. She continued to say how this one was better because its so lifelike. I asked if she saw teh original and she said with derision" No, thats a cartoon".
There is still a bias against animation. That the subject matter cant be as serious as something "live action".
that's a thing for boomers maybe
Damn your aunt did not see the original in 1994?? She got guts
Show your aunt The Hunchback of Notre Dame
@@rodimusmagnus5586 She would never watch it, BUT my sister that hates animation saw Anastasia and liked it.
The only "Life action lion king" I'd ever watch (and actually did over ten years ago) is the musical. Saw it in 2012 (I think) in Hamburg.
THANK YOU! The second I saw the teaser, I was like,
“What’s the point of this, I already saw this movie.”
Why not just re-release the original?
Why not make a close adaptation of the book instead?
@omegaman2846
But it's live action. Now you don't have to feel guilty for watching it as an adult.
It's funny how in this year I've learned why adults are miserable as I worked a 20 hour job while living from paycheck to paycheck in a boarding home because I couldn't afford to rent an apartment. I'm tempted to think misery is meant to be the base state of adults to keep them compliant to a stagnant society.
Hence why we get remakes and dismissal of new ideas or creativity.
@@matityaloran9157that’s what I’m saying!!!!
@@matityaloran9157wait.....there is a book?
The original was already an 11/10 masterpiece. There is literally nothing they could do to make it better.
That's why they're doing it worse now
At the very best, all they will be able to do is make it "almost" as good as the original. As long as it's not "awful" it will probably make a crap ton of money (a lot of people like my kids would probably willingly take their kids to see it - even though it would be a lot cheaper to just borrow my blu-ray of the original and watch that).
Aahhhh, but there's plenty they can do to make it worse. Have you considered that? It's Hollywood's bread and butter!
The question is would it really kill you to have a favorite movie that is available to watch in 2 mediums?
It feels like unnecessary hate and rejection if you're eating good as a HTTYD fan.
The director of the film even said the trailer was purposely adapting 1-1 shots but the actual film will be something new and darker than the original.
@gamewriteeye769 I don't care for darker. The books weren't darker. It's diverging even further from the source material on greater scope that the original. Why are you making a grim dark adaptation for a series written primarily for 10 year olds in the first place?
I have no interest in this project at all.
🤣🤣🤣brooooo I was legit starting to wonder if something was wrong with me, because I feel like I'm in a room full of people cheering, while I'm the only one not getting what there is to cheer about. As I've said repeatedly.... The last movie to the series came out only 5 years ago..... Are we actually serious?
Hey, alteori! I love your channel! And also, no you're not alone. I honestly thought I was alone seeing everyone else's reactions to this garbage. Imo, toothless looks horrible. And I think you said this in your video, and I agree, the trailer looked fan made. Like, everything from the costumes, to the casting, to the setting, to the CGI all looked like a college/fan made project. I think if people wanna see convincingly real looking dragons they should just go watch game of thrones. (I personally don't like got, but there's no denying the dragons there were impressive.)
Good to see you here Alteori. Sanity has left the fandom in the face of nostalgia circlejerk.
Trust me I wasn’t onboard with it. I like how Gerald Butler is in it and how Toothless looks that’s it, but anything else I’m not into it.
Twitter users are the definition of:
"Don't ask questions. Just consume product and then get excited for next product" 🤣
"I clapped"
most of them are bots
This actually looks good tho. The problem was it that disney had OBVIOUS DISDAIN for their original works and were "fixing" them😂. Y'all are the SAME twitter people...just on the haterade side💀
@@no.1spidey-fan182 no it looks shit. It's a shot for shor remake of a film that already exists only done in an inferior medium. Hell the film isn't even good as a live action remake. If they wanted to make it into live action they needed to change Toothless into an actual photorealistic dragon instead of keeping his babyish cartoon design. But no that would require actually creating something new instead of copy pasting something they already did beat for beat like a decade ago.
@blakea.wittenberg5685 Ah yes because people just LOOOOVED when Disney did that in the Lion King remake where they made the animals photorealistic...swear to God, its damned if you do and damned if you don't...just can't please you people💀
Someone literally made a fan edit of the Lion King live action and gave the characters their cartoonish proportions...comment secrion loved it🤣
And its "shot for shot"...so? It if aint broke don't fix it🤣. They learnes from Disney's mistakes. When disney made all those changes every single time y'all had nothing but salt for them which actuslly made sense. Now y'all just want to complain for things not worth complaining about. Life must be good if THIS is what gets to you💀
This is legitimately the ONLY franchise Dreamworks even has that can be work in a live action.
"Inferior medium" you act like How to Teain your Dragon broke the animation mold or something like Spiderverse and Toy Story and Incredibles back in the dsy...it DIDN'T. When you think of GOOD artstyles...HTTYD is NOT the FIRST, SECOMD or THIRD thing on your mind😂
Her mocking was my reaction to people's reactions to the "live action" Lion King trailer lol.
But have you noticed, Disney has been losing money on their remakes since “Beauty and the Beast” and “The Lion King”. The fad wore out its welcome over five years ago.
@@ChienaAvtzonTheir live action remake of "The Lion King" was regarded as the highest grossing animated film of all time for a while.
@@ChienaAvtzonthat’s around the time they got lazy and started making shot for shot remakes of the animated movies. Prior to that the live action movies at least were reimagined versions of the originals
Same. The only good "live action" remake (aside from Cinderella because I didn't see it) was The Jungle Book because they blended the Disney story and elements from the book.
@elcaballeronyc No, they weren't lol. Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin were basically shot for shot with a couple added elements to make them longer.
In all of these movies, they oddly always make the villains different and more lame too.
Glad to know I wasn’t the only one who noticed the hypocritical lizard brain of the masses.
@koopa159
I was shocked by the positive reaction to the trailer tbh...
@@koopa159 yh its hypocritical when you leave out ALL the context💀
@@no.1spidey-fan182 if I wanted to know the errors of your models I would of asked😂
The "key-jangling" line killed me 😂😂😂
We don't need more anti-animation remakes! Don't pay to see this remake of HTTYD, no matter how much you want to hate-watch it.
wasn’t planning to either way. i’m skipping any live action remakes.
Wasn't planning on it
@wesmcinerny4524
Cute that you think anyone will hate watch this when the reaction to the trailer is an overwhelmingly positive one.
No, people will see it. They WILL like it, and we'll get more live action remakes.
I'm not spending theatre prices (which might be even higher by the time this slop releases) to go see something I'm already not interested in.
@DemonicRemption Got lost, troll.
These Live-Action Animation Remakes are a Huge Disservice to the OG Films.
@@gloriathomas3245 nobody realized how much of a Success "How to Train Your Dragon" became once it made Billions at the Box Office.
This video was quite cathartic, it's sometimes hard to not feel like a cynical buzzkill when everyone around you is cheering and you just ask yourself "What the F is wrong with you people?" 😂
Nostalgia is a powerful tool.
Unfortunately we have now become the boomers who can't let go of their youth. Nostalgia is good and fun, but it has gotten completely out of control and there is nothing for the new generation.
Also its official, Hollywood and the internet have caused Jester's brain to crack! She'll be in Arkham Asylum in a straight jacket screaming "IT’S THE SAME THING!" and "WHY ARE YOU CLAPPING!" in no time!
@@sammysstopmotionoas1996 Don’t pay to see it.
@@wesmcinerny4524 believe me, I WON'T.
Love Rurouni Kenshin: The beginning 2021 & Let me eat your pancreas 2017. Same goes for their animated counterparts.
Dang dude, you have a point. We accuse older generations of trying to relive their youth again, yet we are desperate not to leave it at all.
We need to let go. We need something new. The actual children of today need something new.
@@sammysstopmotionoas1996 Nothing for this new generation? I disagree. My friend's kids are currently having a dope childhood with alot of new animes, mangas, webtoons & K-dramas.
my reaction was "this is completely unnecessary"
My reaction was, “why didn’t make a faithful adaptation of the book instead?”
@@matityaloran9157I think "Rescue Riders" might be closer to the books.
Same
Isn't Toothless's design in the original book completely different?
Why is this remake about the animated adaptation and not the original book?
Seem parasitic and lazy to copy and paste something just because it worked in the past instead of being daring and original.
@ I agree
I really hate the way Hollywood treats animation and video games. They’ll really look so one of the greatest trilogies of all time (HTTYD) and go, “that’s cool. BUT WAIT TILL YOU SEE OURS”. And it’s sad how people lose their minds over shot for shot stuff that doesn’t even look that impressive, man. I’m glad I’m not the only one who saw the reactions and was like “god, you’re all kinda idiots”. I always say we’re the reason Hollywood is the way it is. Not Hollywood itself. It’s our fault. 😂😂😂
EDIT: BRUH I’M SO GLAD YOU MENTIONED THAT CHILDREN ARE BASICALLY GROWING UP WITH NOTHING ORIGINAL. We had Spy Kids, The Incredibles, High School Musical, Catch That Kid, Bridge To Terabithia, Narnia, etc. They’ll really have nothing new and classic. It’s so sad, dude.
The closest children nowadays have is things like “Frozen”, “Coco”, and “Encanto”.
@@ChienaAvtzoncocomelon*
@@ChienaAvtzonand Bluey, I guess
I swear barely anything original has been made within the last 10-15 years by now. At least nothing resembling a proper children's story that inspires them.
Spy Kids was ridiculous, but it was imaginative.
“IT’S A CARTOON DRAGON! Said Jesterbell calmly.”
The thing that actually makes me furious about all of this is that it feeds into and strengthens western culture's bias against animation as an art form. Animation is still largely seen as "lesser" than live-action. I've known people who have to be all but pressured into watching an animated movie--even if they think the plot sounds interesting! And even when they do end up enjoying a good animated movie (such as HTTYD), there's that underlying sentiment of "Well, it was ALMOST perfect, except for the fact that it wasn't live-action (or hyper-realistic uncanny valley CGI pretending to be live-action)." And this ticks me off more than just about anything in the world because it's basically the same thing as looking at a beautiful painting and going "Well, this is good, but it'd be better if it was a photograph." Animation is not the cheaper, easier alternative to live-action. It's actually much more expensive and time-consuming. The artists who love this medium and choose to tell stories with it deserve to be respected and held in the same (or heck, even HIGHER) regard as the greatest live-action filmmakers.
I’m just waiting for Astrid to show up so I can laugh at it.
Wasn't she race swapped too? 😂
What there's more. Astrid had been race swapped. Nuff said
@@cynicalperson161not even given blonde hair even though I’ve seen people say she’s naturally blonde 😂 at some point you have to wonder if the people making this are just having a laugh.
@@dumdumer892 Like what's the point of a Live Action *remake* if the characters don't look similar to their original counterpart? I don't get it.
Same In not watching this cinimatic abortion or at least I won't pay to.
The last sputters of JesterBell's sanity are kinda hilarious, not gonna lie 🤣
HTTYD: Folie a Deux 😂
Imagine a HTTYD musical movie😂😂
Oh please no. I’ve heard what happens at the end of that movie and I don’t want them to go all Arifureta on Toothless.
@FilmnerdTV, they could make a song titled “Only the Strong can Belong”, and “Becoming the Hard Way” and “Hail Barbaria”. But that would require being closer to the books
THANK YOU!!! I've been screaming the same thing! I'm beyond annoyed that it takes this little for people to be pleased. Nobody will ever convince me this remake was remotely necessary.
I don't think HTTYD needed a live action adaptation
It didn’t need a film adaptation, which barely scratched the surface of the books, so it would just make you wonder, why tie it to the books in the first place?
this remake exists purely for 2 reasons
1. nostalgia money
2. it's for boomers who liked httyd but feel ashamed of watching an animated movie
the funniest part is the only REAL appeal this movie could've had was seeing the dragons in a more realistic light. But toothless looks just like his cartoony self with a realistic texture pack. He was not meant to be realistic
“It’s the same picture”
Micheal !
I'll never understand why people want live actions, specially ones that are just a copy of an animated project. I had someone in all seriousness say that's interesting to see how the story will look with real actors and was like "No. Why would it when it already works perfectly in animation?"
And some defend this by saying that they never got to experience the movies in theatre, but now they can... 😐
I don't mind remakes & reboots. If it's good, I'll enjoy it. If it's bad, I'll just move on. As an anime fan, I love the live action Rurouni Kenshin films.
I don’t mind live action movies my biggest debate is, is it better than the cartoon probably not but I know the cartoon lion King is better than the live action one then again we have Mufasa coming out but I never watched the animated how to train your Dragon I think I watched it once when it first came out and that was it.
I think a lot of people like to see the contrasts. People like exploring the protagonists relationship in all the versions of "Mo Dao Zu Shi" as well as their special song.
Then they should rent out a theater and watch the original.
@@JoelKellenProductions thats an even worse argument, oh just spend a lot more money for nothing, because this isnt even theater experience
You don’t know how pissed I was when I was trying to look up a reaction to the trailer that did not like it like myself but every trailer reaction was just everyone being happy and I thought I was going crazy 😂😂😂
Most people that texted instead were clowning it.
LMFAOOOO THANK YOU! "you clapping seals!" 💀 i felt like i was the only one thinking this when i saw people cheering and screaming out of joy on X.
This has the same energy as Ren smashing his head repeatedly with a hammer while listening to Happy Happy Joy Joy.
The director managed to copy the frames of his own film, can you imagine 😂
Is it really the same director too? Why would he even bother to be in the project? 😂
@@iceprism367 It is! He said he loved this world so much that he wanted to return again. But I think it was the dollar signs in his eyes
I literally called out this movie, and all of a sudden some rando on Facebook accused me of being a pedo, just because I made fun of his precious live action remake. This is a cult at this point.
The irony that this is likely projection.😂
Wood Chippers really need to be funded by our taxes and given to every single person. The problem will eventually be solved.
@@seaweeb2258 Amen to that!
Well, that's just bizarre.
That's doesn't sound true
@@atobosrolloutyoutube7886 You’d be surprised if the whack job fans of kids movies/kids shows…remember, the broney community has its fair share of psychos
They really took the model from the cartoon and gave it a texture pack 😂
I lost when you yelled out "It's the same SHOT!" Like good lord! I've never seen you blow up like this. Not only that, I had to do a double take cause it almost sounds like you said "shit". That's how surprised I was listening to you yell.
Back on topic, I didn't know there was a live action HtTYD trailer till I saw videos of people showing Toothless in live action CGI and I said to myself "Wait. This is live action? He looks the same only with a little more detail." And that's it.
This reminds me of how Marvel and DC have these little reference points just to go "here! are you pacified now nerds?" Then gets back to being inaccurate or lame. Usually signified by having the characters tear down the costume or mention how outdated/too much is it. Some of them not even putting them on but relegate it to the background as a stationary prop.
What's worse is the new norm No Way Home set up, where it used to be those easter eggs/references were not easily noticed by general audiences, they were there for hardcore nerds to nerd out over, examples I can think of are in the first Iron Man Tony's Mark III started out gold on the monitor, then he told J.A.R.V.I.S. to throw a little hot rod red in there, and if you know the comics, you know that the Mark I was gray, the Mark II was gold, and then the Mark III had the traditional Iron Man color scheme, another good example is the use of The Lonely Man from the 70's The Incredible Hulk series with Bill Bixby and Lou Ferrigno being used in a scene in The Incredible Hulk film with Ed Norton, and it's used to convey the emotions that the tragedy of Bruce's life should have, but with No Way Home's success, now Hollywood thinks, "Oh if I just quote the stuff from the past or recreate shots from the past that's instant cash"
THANK YOU!!!
I honestly thought i was going crazy with how many people were so excited.
When i saw the trailer, i screamed 'NOOOO!' so loud. I wanted to throw my phone.
I dont want this, i don't need this.
I suggest seeking therapy if your getting that mad over a trailer 👍
Like there's nothing wrong with not liking it but getting that mad is bad for your health
Haha. Great video. Loved your energy, especially the clapping 😂
What's worse is that this is a shot-for-shot live action remake of the original 2010 animated film. I rather just watch the original instead of the remake.
NOT YOU TOO DREAMWORKS I THOUGHT YOU WERE BETTER THAN THIS
isnt their whole company built on making fun of disney anyway
btw thanks for giving me the vent ive been holding in
That image was due to Katzenberg leaving Disney before founding DreamWorks, and now he sold it to Universal.
_Cinderella_ (2015) knew what live-action means. Apparently nowadays it means live-action cartoon.
Oh I'm not the only one, thank god 🤣 I felt so weird seeing that trailer because like, sure, looks nice- but the fact that Toothless looks exactly like the og made me break all immersion I had. It honestly made the actor look like the weird one out, I'm not sure I can watch this movie and not think I could be watching the animated one (that still holds up pretty nicely)
Haven't how to train your dragon franchise took enough Ls since the nine realms?
I knew i wasnt crazy. He looks the exact same!
Watch it get nominated for awards that Hollywood would never give the original a chance for because "animation is for kids" and "just something you chuck on to keep the kids quiet"...
That one time they got the live action princess actresses to announce the award still boils my blood.
They can feed us the exact same thing with a fresh coat of CGI, bland acting, and gray colors because our OH SO PRECIOUS NOSTALGIA fills in the blanks. And we will not remember it existed it in a month.
Happened with the Lion King, and it will happen again with this one.
That was a opening 😂 glad to see jest in top form
I love to see the break down 🤣 sums up the past decade or so.
50s in and I'm so here for this energy 😂
Don't get all worked up, most people on the Internet are NPCs, nothing new.
I think what's worth getting worked up about is the millions/billions of dollars being spent on all this B grade slop when that money could be spent on anything else.
I watched the trailer here on YT and when I scrolled down to the comment section this was the first thing I saw:
"An animated version of this would be so cool."
I agree. No one needs this "live action" version.
Damn, who's gonna tell 'em 😭
Unless, of course, the comment you saw was just sarcasm from someone who knew the og movie.
Well you see, kids are going to grow up with these live action remakes... And then in 20 years from now they're going to get super excited to watch the ANIMATED remakes of the live action ones, and it will all come full circle.
At least ATLA is 20 years...in 2025.
Finally my exact thinking. They changed nothing but made it worse.
It should be titled: How to Make Money off the Same Film Twice.
“Doesn’t anyone else notice this?! I feel like I’m taking CRAZY PILLS!”
I HATE THIS SO MUCH WHY ARE THEY HAPPY IT WILL NEVER END
So we can't be happy anymore
Nostalgia makes people stupid
Stupid people makes nostalgia
Yeah I saw this trailer and I swear most comments were like wow looks good! And I'm over here like "WTF people this looks dumb as fk and not NEEDED!!!"
I thought it looked nearly as bad as the “Snow White” trailer.
The CGI Toothless is still technically animated, But at least it looks good, unlike the Minecraft film or the CGI in any of the Live action Disney movies
lol, you’re so on point. Thank you for calling this out. Hopefully you can help more people see the light 💡
When we think society has reached peak stupidity and are walking back from it, they manage to surprise us and get more stupid.
Bless you for your good old fashioned COMMON SENSE!!! Yes! And I absolutely agree with you! The clapping seals thing almost had me falling off my chair laughing. 😂 Okay...we can both go take a rest now. 😂😂🤣
The opera music was just top tier in the back and when you just froze - like 😂 amazing reaction!
You know this video was going to be good with that title.
And if people have learned nothing after the Disney Live Action remakes by now, then this title is deserved
PS damn and people thought Jeater got mad with what hollywood does with Harley Quinn, but this might have cracked her.
Worst part is there's multiple of those films so they could end remaking all of them in live action. 🙄
7:35, true. And it wasn’t a close adaptation at all. Speaking as a fan of the books, if the new movies were truer to the text adaptations of them then I would be all for it. That’s not what the trailer advertises at all. It offers a recreation of the 2010 film
Finally a fan of the books! I wholeheartedly agree!
Y’all know they raceswapped Astrid?
It's a generation feeling nostalgia that's never felt nostalgic before.
I really hate how adults don't apreciate animation and then they jump into the Live action remakes just because it's not "animated"
The irony is that they are animated or at least animated in some parts.
This is how I felt when The Force Awakens was announced and everyone cheered. I was in a shop, and on the radio the presenter said that every Star Wars fan was excited for there being a new film, and I thought - I'm not, what are they doing, leave it alone, you can only make it worse!
It's going to be the exact same shit over and over and over and over and over again.🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
The live action toothless looks exactly like the animated version. Literally there is no reason to make this movie.
Yep. Giving it a pass. I'm appalled that the studios would stoop so low as to repeat a live action version of a great animated feature. It's like Dreamworks learned NOTHING from Disney. They have so much stored in the vaults that they could take a chance on, but no.... just gives us more repeats. JFC....
I genuinely thought it was a fan trailer because it was a shot-per-shot remake.
And then we wonder why we only get those kind of „Mainstream“ movies/Blockbusters…..
I find it weird they make a movie that was already made but now in live action, why not just make a different story
Why not make the story of Cowell’s books into a movie?
"They're the same face! Doesn't anybody notice this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!"
If disney wants to please older fans, why not spend 1k-20k on a small project that re-imagines' an older animated shot or scene, but in real life? It could be used as a promotional piece for an _original_ upcoming movie that can be used to showcase their creative potential rather than spending 100 million dollars on a flop that no one asked for.
It's basically a shot for shot ... except Astrid ...
CGI Toothless doesn't seem too different from animated Toothless but obviously animated Toothless takes the cake because he looks more akin to a cute goofy cat just by his eyes while the other one looks only like just a big lizard.
Jesterbell at the beginning: YOU STUPID FOOLS!!
Me just eating Doritos not having a clue wth is going on: what did I do?
How to Train Your Dragon is very nearly a perfect movie. At best, at the very absolute best, if absolutely everything from the acting to the directing to the music works PERFECTLY, the BEST you can do is _equal_ it. You literally CAN'T do better than the original (by definition - it's a _perfect_ movie). So, you're most likely going to make a movie that isn't as good.
And, even if you do equal the REAL movie, it will always only be a derivative copy of the original.
But, as you mention, the point of this movie is feed people member berries and to be a ($250 million commercial) for Universal Studios HTTYD ride. And, to that end, it will probably be quite successful.
Animated dragon to animated dragon...and they still manage to make him look worse. Why does this movie exist?
Masses: WE WANT ORIGINAL FILMS
Also Masses: toothless looks so good in live action…
Dont forget the part where they ignore original films cause they aren’t based on a popular franchise
lol okay you got me at 0;50 second mark laughing.
0:48 someone make a 1 hour version of this scene
Yeah, I had the same reaction. Read the comments below the official trailer on YT and everyone was like "Wow, this looks so cool" "Hype" "Great to have Gerald Butler back as Stoic".
I have three possible explenations:
-Bunch of twenty somethings. Most of them say they saw this film as a kid, so perhaps they have not been burned yet with life action remakes as we older ones have.
-The trailer included interviews iwth the director and staff and apparently its mostly the same creative team, including the same director, and in the interview, he talks very passionatly about how he wants to make this movie. So my guess is that many believe him and that this one will actuall be good.
-Its not Disney, and apparently Disney is the only company that can hoark up life - action remakes.
Yeah, all these films as a kid and love them. And I would also do chronological timeline from all the TV shows and Netflix shows to prepare for the third movie. It was fantastic. But I’m hype for this live action remake, especially since the original creator still involved and some people from the animated movie reprise their role
Universal has done some live action remakes in the past. They did a couple of live action films of "The Flintstones" and one of "How The Grinch Stole Christmas."
@@ThePrincessCHyet one flopped HARD and that Grinch is beloved because its RESPECTFUL to the source material while also being unique
And this is why we'll never get anything new. Harambe took every new idea with him, RIP
Why not just re-release the original in theaters? It's waaaaay cheaper.
I'll admit that the dragons CGI does look a lot better than I was expecting but everything else looks HORRID.
Nah man, toothless looks horrid too. He's soulless now.
@@frostbittenskater995those eyes have alot of soul to me
@@atobosrolloutyoutube7886 you sweet summer child. Look at it in comparison to the original. (And yes you can compare because both are CGI.) "Live action" toothless has nothing inside his eyes when you look at how the original looked and behaved. The original animation had so much life and vibrancy. Whereas the that new thing looks like how I do just after waking up. Lol
@@frostbittenskater995 they look the exact same but ok that's your opinion bro and i have mine🙌
@@atobosrolloutyoutube7886 fair enough (but they don't look the same. Lol)
I had the same reaction you did, except yours is so much more entertaining because I have the personality of a shoe box.
We need new material!
That nobody is gonna watch
Pete's Dragon was also a pretty decent Live Action remake that did something different from the original. It wasn't anything amazing but it was ok.
Notice Astrid isn’t shown in it.
When I saw it announced on a public FB post the other day, I commented "I just don't understand why we need this," and *hundreds* of people responded to me. Some agreed, some said it was a money grab or that it was about Epic Universe (okay, yeah), but a lot of people said they really want it, called me a Karen, said I'm not the target audience, and verbally attacked me for questioning it. I think the original trilogy is near perfect. I think these remakes are lifeless when you compare them to the expressiveness of the original animation. I just don't get why people keep consuming this stuff.
Honestly to me so far it looks good but will see with the final product cautiously optimistic
I feel you, girl! I'm so done with this shiz too! I mean, who care anymore and they also race swap characters every single time to score diversity points which is also annoying. I wouldn't mind as much if they didn't do it every single time!
Who has been race swap
I care I'm excited
Haha! I love the hysteria over how insane you thought the reaction was, kinda looks like this broke you just a bit 😂
I grew up in the 90's, live action remakes were a thing then too. The ones that stood out to me were The Flinstones, The Jungle Book (with Jason Scott Lee that had real animals that didn't talk) and 101 Dalmations. I remember being really hyped to see them because it felt like the stories and characters that you knew and loved "coming to life". Animation feels almost like a dream when you're a kid, whereas live action movies felt more real, and when you see an animated and live action version of the same thing, it felt like the live action version was the "real", "grownup" version. I felt the same way when watching the very first TMNT movie for the first time, after having watched the cartoon show, same with Ghostbusters; in that situation, the live action versions actually did come out first. It just inspires curiosity more than anything.
Of course as an adult, I now feel differently. When you realise that animation isn't just for kids and in fact many of the animated shows and films you grew up loving are still great in adulthood, you realise you don't need it to be live action to enjoy it. You also realise that whether its live action or animated, all film is artifice; yes it can be more easy to relate if something has real humans in it, but animation has that power and more, and considering how many big movies now are more than half CGI, seems like filmmakers realise that there's only so much you can achieve in live action.
So I think these remakes will definitely have a greater appeal to kids than adults, even though they're marketed to adults who grew up with the originals. But of course it'll be the originals that'll end up enduring, which is already happening with the disney remakes, even though they of course all have their fans.
HTTYD will be the same I imagine, coz like you, when I saw this teaser, all I saw was the original but with real humans in silly costumes, and a CGI dragon that looks almost identical to what was already an exaggerated cartoon design, totally out of place in live action; it would be like if they manipulated the Hiccup actor's features to be more like the animated version with massive eyes, large head, pencil neck and extra thin, gangly limbs, that would be ridiculous because of course the features were exaggerated in the animation because its ANIMATION! They didn't even attempt to create something that might pass off as a real dragon; yes okay, its fantasy so there are no rules for this, but even something like Smaug in The Hobbit or Draco from Dragonheart, both very expressive, talking dragons in live action, had designs that felt like they belonged in the real world. That's what live action remakes should be doing, translate and change to fit the medium.
The designs in the original HTTYD were very stylized as all Dreamworks movies are, they fit that particular aesthetic. The live action doesn't look stylised from what I can tell, with the real actors, real costumes and sets, location shooting, the dragons should reflect that. But instead they're capitalising on nostalgia and fan service, it looks like a fan movie, not something you'd think a serious filmmaker would do.
Early days though, we'll have to wait and see. But till then, in my opinion, live action remakes that cater only for fans of the originals are just trying to live up to a child's impression of what "real" and "grownup" mean. Fine for kids, but for the rest of us we should be demanding more.
Pantheon on AMC or Vox Machima needs to be turned into live action.
Live action demake
Laughs in GenX
Was that middle finger at 3:13 intentional? 😅
It's ok, these are the last gasps of the old studios before they get replaced by AI.
Congratulations...you broke her.
LMAO Exactly! Videos like this are why I'm subscribed 😊😂
JesterBell gets sees through the b.s.
I hate the updated Toothless design. They removed the fullness and softness from Chris Sander's style, so he doesn't look as cute. I don't like it. 😭
That is not how I reacted at all, i was disappointed and disheartened... it's not how it's the same that makes me angry, it's how it's different.
They need to make new things, not remake old things.