As a Liverpool fan i’m not inclined to side with Chelski, but that was absolute robbery yesterday. Better side by a mile. What is VAR there for if not to catch stuff like hair pulling. It’s a joke. Too many people in control, who have never played the game.
I as a Spurs fan have to say I agree, we got stomped and I'm not complaining about the fact we pulled of the heist if the century for a point, did it at Leicester, did it at Ajax, did it at Chelsea. We have had so many times we've been robbed by ref's or VAR but if we don't all hold it to the same standard then we can't expect it to improve. It's purpose is to overturn wrong decisions or to have the referee review previous incidents. If it wasn't doing that then WHAT WAS IT DOING??? Still, believe it or not it wasn't just Spurs getting away with stuff, felt like the ref was almost overcorrecting his bias from the noise of the bridge because so many times he made terrible calls and it happened for both sides. Still I don't want to entirely blame him because once again WHERE IS VAR???
Although I agree Chelsea were the better team by a mile & deserved to win, but VAR doesn't step in to correct all decisions within the game. The hair pulling was checked for violent conduct, which it isn't as per the current law. I think, the Richarlison decision was a definite offside though, because the keeper has to factor in a deflection from Richarlison before diving for the original shot.
I do agree as a Spurs fan, but we have been on the receiving end when Terry handled the ball into the goal in the league cup final. Swings and roundabouts!
and the linesman...even the ref had to over rule him and give Chelsea the stonewall corner which the blind bat standing three metres away wanted to give as a Spurs goalkick
Chelsea were by far the best side . I thought it would be a closer match and as a spurs fan I’ve no problem saying that. As for the ref , I see why Chelsea fans are calling him out . On the flip side Chelsea should have taken their chances and missed a couple of sitters . Spurs weren’t lucky, they just didn’t give up . If Chelsea had defended the Kane goal properly they’d have won . A good point for us away .
Spurs is just an overrated team to be honest. Did you just say Spurs weren't lucky?? You played nothing all match. You only had 2 goals due to corruption. This is like saying the Son of Bill Gates became the president of Microsoft through Hard work
@@limofootball yeah he should have. I agree. But Chelsea played better than us. And even if Kane had scored it shouldn’t have made a difference if you’d taken your chances. Which you didn’t. That’s how it goes sometimes
@@ibstudiosHD we weren’t lucky. We scored 2 goals and got a draw. Chelsea should have won but you didn’t. That’s the way the cookie crumbles. We can go back and forth all day but if you don’t take your chances what do you expect. As for being overrated , that’s just your anger and disappointment talking.
I absolutely loved what happened between the managers. Next time Tottenham play Chelsea it's gonna be either balls to the wall action or 1 side blasting the other
Chelsea were miles ahead yesterday. Spurs had 12 players on the pitch including the ref. The stats don’t lie and Chelsea were better in every department.
In the first half they were, much more even contest once Richarlison came on. All that possession, and only 3 shots on target, seems wasteful to me. Chelsea aren't that far ahead.
You cant blame the ref for missing the hair pulling, if you watch the replay from behind the goal you can see he's looking at the ball at the near post. The blame goes to VAR for not checking it and advising the ref to go over to the monitor. That being said Chelsea did fail to defend the corner. The first goal is a clear offside, Mendy has his weight on his left leg having to look around Richarlason, who's directly in the vision of the keeper, the ball goes to his right which is why hes so slow to dive as he has to redirect his weight to go the oppersite direction. Plus the minute Richarlason moves his body so the ball goes around him he becomes active which is what I thought was the rules of offside.
It's annoying that people always find it difficult to be honest and take responsibility. I'm sure everyone knew what caused all the drama. FA, REF and VAR are just corrupt like hell. Take it or leave it
Problem is you can’t keep giving the same referee in high profile games for chelsea. Enough is enough. I am fine if some other ref messes up, but if the same guy does it again and again you need change
Never been a great fan of Souness but he doesn’t deserve the stick he’s getting after what he said last night, what he said was completely right after all there were no women on the pitch, if he said it during a womens game then you have an argument but otherwise leave the man alone
@@liamfred9011 he was doing post match analysis sat next to Karen Carney (ex England womens footballer) and he was talking about how the refs aren’t giving free kicks for diving which led to no one trying to dive and he said that’s the way it should be “it’s a man’s game” and he got a load of abuse on twitter for it but got a lot of support as well
@@Danimal13 The feminists and woke brigade literally getting their knickers/mankini's in a twist, over a comment he made...that they heard out of context to what he meant!
Spurs showed a lot of character and heart but we were completely outplayed and deserved to lose. Tuchel's tactics were brilliant and we got completely overrun in midfield
@@goldboy150 yeah and we didn't lose, you had 90 minutes and you didn't beat us, we had five shots at your goal, your mob had 3 shots at our goal, so if all goals went in, then we would have won, if the boot was on the other foot, you would not moaning like a child. So keep quiet unless you have constructive statement to make🤫🤐
Hanging on to take an incredibly lucky, very scrappy point against Chelsea after having been dominated for the entire game isn't what I would call 'closing the gap'. For me it's like saying that West brom are now title contenders because they beat Chelsea 5-2 and drew 3-3. Tottenham's signings are average at best, the players they had prior are average at best, and they've just done very average against Chelsea. Baffles me that people are hyping them up this much
Before the game Chelsea was lucky to gain anything from this fixture, the bubbles burst. Tottenhams still a shambles nearly being outscored by a team without a striker
@@terrydavid5671 didn’t give the foul on cucurella. Didn’t send maguire off for kicking batshuayi in the nuts, didn’t give a penalty when maguire held azpi down in the box. Gave a free kick in tottenhams favour when gazaniga missed the ball and clattered into alonso.
@@terrydavid5671 lol. What game were you watching? If you want to see a deliberate stamp that went unpunished in this fixture, incidentally the same referee I believe, have a look at lo celso on azpilicueta two seasons ago.
@@trevorgibb1019 that was mane but your point stands. Keita should of been sent off in the league cup final for a wreckless studs up to the groin area challenge on chalobah, not sure if that was Taylor or not, I think it may have been one of the other incompetent match fixing fucks
All the best to souness btw. Getting destroyed by the PC brigade because he said it's a man's game, while commenting on a men's game. Shame on people. I stand with souness
Is he getting grief online? I've never seen anything but knew it was coming! Absolutely pathetic, he was commenting on a man's game and i agreed with it all
More Spurs supporters at TalkSport than Chelsea supporters... Clearly. They got battered simple as that. Media trying to make out Spurs are the next Madrid 🤣
I won’t go as far as to suggest that Taylor has some sort of agenda against us but he constantly makes bad calls when officiating our matches. He sent Kovacic off for getting his foot stepped on by Xhaka in the FA cup final. Just a bad ref, can’t believe he’s going to be officiating at the World Cup.
@@ktbffh_cf How come Tuchel ( yellow carded when Spurs scored their first equalizer ) didn't get sent off in the 76th minute for running 50 meters outside of his technical area - instant yellow card offense ?
Chelsea were significantly better. It’s obvious to anyone who saw the game that the score didn’t reflect that, so how can anyone in all seriousness ask such a one sided question?!!
It's so many years that Anthony Taylor always tries to drag Chelsea FC down. The funny thing is everyone supported him. The FA are always ready to counter argue on every facts Chelsea came up. There can't be good or bad days for a referee as far as Anthony Taylor is concern because it goes on for quite too long. Is he have a vendetta towards Chelsea FC? I really wonder.
I don't understand how any of the Spurs goals can be determined to be favours from Anthony Taylor or there's been an Anthony Taylor agenda against Chelsea in this game. The tackle on Havertz was questionable or a certain foul from the initial tv angle as I wondered how Bentancur had got away with that, however if you see the replays from the referee's angle its not a foul...clearly got the ball hence the play carried on. The Spurs goal that goes in 45 seconds later (if its going to be ruled out) has to be ruled out by the linesman or VAR for interference / obstruction from Richarlison. Neither of which happened so nothing to do with Anthony Taylor. Likewise the Cucurella / Romero incident is a foul / red card which I can only assume that Taylor hasn't seen as he's probably watching the flight of the ball, so again the referee has to be reliant on VAR. The fact that the replay of that incident was shown multiple times before the next corner was taken would suggest that VAR were checking it but they didn't invite the referee to check it himself via the monitor. Again... ultimately nothing to do with Anthony Taylor. If there are questions to be answered it's perhaps around VAR Spurs were fortunate for the point, Chelsea were unlucky not to take all three but that is football. As everybody knows these things tend to even themselves out over a season.
Thing is anthony taylor is ALWAYS involved when these things happen vs chelsea. Id wager that VAR notified him of all and he said no. Either that or it is actually the FA that plans these robberies in advance(which i believe). Why else would taylor be refereeing chelsea every time they have a big game knowing their past? There is something fishy here. Corruption can be found in any walk of life in every single country and society, but somehow professional english football is clean?? The serie a wasn't... The premier league isn't either and it is high time refs paid for their crimes
Cucurella was trying the face towards and hold the opponent rather than face the ball. This was outlawed some time ago. This was before Romero pulled him down so if the ref had seen it then it’s a penalty and then possibly then a red card for Romero for retaliation if it was deemed serious enough although Cucurella wasn’t hurt. James foul on Kane late on when already on a yellow was a close call for a second yellow not mentioned and Spurs didn’t make a fuss just got on with it. Chelsea also glossed over the push in the back of Kulu when they won the ball for their second goal and again no whinging from Spurs.
finally someone intelligent here! its shocking how many people actually think he hates chelsea. the reason he gets so many big games involving clubs such as chelsea is because he is such a good referee. that said, the romero incident shouldve been red. also the first spurs goal i honestly think stands. as for the goal (im a spurs fan so im going to be a bit biased) i personally believe should stand. richarlison is too far to have any impact and mendy has a clear line of sight to the ball. as for the foul i personally think its a great tackle and bentancur clearly gets the ball. its too far back to rule out tho.
@@thelittleowl1 it's probably not obvious from my post but I'm a Spurs fan too. I think football fans at times (not specifically Chelsea fans I must add) struggle to look at games objectively and likewise the incidents within games in isolation so come to the natural conclusion that there's an agenda in play due to some sort of history with a given referee. However that's not to say that all referee's are unbiased and honest in each game but I genuinely didn't see anything in this game that suggested Taylor was playing up and favouring Spurs over Chelsea. It would be interesting to see all the Taylor incidents that have impacted Chelsea in recent years listed in one place so the non Chelsea fans can make their own minds up.
Can we all be honest to ourselves for once! It’s offside and a foul pulling down a man by his hair! What is so difficult about saying it is wrong and it should never had happened the way it did? Smh….
Simon spot on, hair pulling isn’t violent conduct and as ball wasn’t in play there could be no foul given. Sure Souness encountered bias in Scotland but it was for his team so he doesn’t recognise it. Jim must also be suffering with memory loss on bias, he’s forgotten the Cadette signing scandal amongst other bias?
I keep hearing this “Ball wasn’t in play”. But that’s factually incorrect, the corner had been taken when the hair pull happened. Forget VAR and red cards, the ref is looking at it from 5 yards away, clear as day. He should do his job, give the foul and that second corner never happens.
@@bfb187 Incorrect, anything that happens from the time the referee enters the field of play until the match officials depart is subject to the laws of the game.
@@brianbates212 yes and the law states a foul can only be given when the ball is in play unless its violent conduct. That's why Simon points out pulling hair is not classed as violent conduct in the laws of the game.
@@bfb187 go watch the highlights back, I’ve watched them numerous times. The kick had been taken and was almost at the near post by the time the hair was pulled. There’s no doubt about that, it’s not even close
Hello there, is there any particular reason that they remove the full podcast of youtube? Is there anywhere i can find the full podcast to watch/listen to?
Should Tuchel be saying and stating the obvious? Of course he should, it’s not first time that Anthony Taylor and probably some other officials have done us wrong. As Tuchel stated it’s clear that every Chelsea fan, Tuchel himself and even the players know something is wrong regards to his decisions and other officials as a matter of fact which shows how bad the situation is. The problem really isn’t just with yesterday’s decision, it’s that things like this happen often and NOT JUST TO CHELSEA let me be clear. I’ve seen videos of him making awful decisions in other games too.
Just so I get this straight, if pulling the hair of another player is not violent conduct, I can just pull the hair of any opposition player whenever I want if the referee isn’t looking at me? According to the rules pulling hair is not a red card offense so VAR cannot do anything about it and neither can they recommend the referee to give a foul or yellow card since that’s not their domain. Every player should now sneakingly pull opposition players’ hair when the referee is looking somewhere else. Ridiculous.
Violent conduct or, when using it to pull the player to the ground unexpectedly could easily be interpreted as endangering an opponent; both of which ARE red card offenses.
That's the point though isn't it. Spurs didn't turn up, played as bad as I've seen since, probably against Wolves last season, and took a point at a ground we always play terrible at. Once Richarlison, Bissouma and Perisic came on there was no difference at all. Need to stop playing the victim and move on.
@@probinson6111 finally someone who talks sense 😂😂😂 these chelsea fans are so bitter mate it’s brilliant aha tactical masterclass but drew 2-2 due to contes tactically genius subs😂🤷🏽♂️ Simple as that
It’s okay to agree as a spurs fan that Chelsea outplayed us. Not every battle will be easy even for the best teams (eg psg, Chelsea, Liverpool vs Real Madrid in the champions league). What fans appreciate is the improvement in the mentality and work rate. We really didn’t lie down and get beat we worked hard to get a draw when we would have usually lost it
Simon said the first goal wasn't a problem because Mendy didn't complain bout it. But feels coaches should be fined more because they complained and have high salary.
Definently when it involves Chelsea😂😂, can't wait until they come to our ground, the atmosphere will be electric and we will win that game... COME ON YOU SPURS.
Even if Richarlison was not directly in the line of Mendy’s sight he is still very close to the ball as it comes in and Mendy has to anticipate that he could kick the ball and change the direction of the shot therefore has to delay his dive which means that Richarlison is interfering with play so it is 100% an offside goal and shouldn’t have stood.
Frankly, I don't understand the concept that it's talking about, if it's an offside then it should be an offside, no need to judge the goalkeeper's movement or anything else because when Sterling's goal last week was ruled out for offside then it was offside, we take it I think we should not use double standards in analyzing it anyway I'm just a fan who is proud to see the team continue to work hard to improve performance to get the results
the gap has closed a bare minimum.. if the ref actually was neutral it would be 2-0 and what would we be saying about the gap ? the ref had a masterclass for tottenham and people think the gap has closed
This morning, sky sports showed Mendy’s position to look at the ball. He had to lean to the left to be able to see the ball, reason it took to much time to lean to the right to make the stop and Richarlison moved to then right to hide the ball as it was going towards goal. Now tell me he wasn’t implied in the play and wasn’t offside. Check the goal from all angles before you make a decision.
Bentancur's tackle on Havertz was clear tackle by one toe... and If somebody pulls my hair for one second stopping the match, will i fall?No.... And hojberg goal could have been blocked but nobody did.... 🤷🏾♂️ it was a steal point like any other game, that's it. Referee was not biased... Chelsea dominated but they had just unlucky game whereas Spurs didn't give up.💪🏾
How about the FA taking Tuchels comments onboard and have a look at Anthony Taylor? Not only was he incompetent in this game but his history when reffing Chelsea does withstand close scrutiny. It cant just be general ineptitude. You have to wonder whether he should be refereeing at this level?
Not sure why people can't accept the fact that referees CAN be biased for and against certain clubs, it's not some conspiracy theory, they're humans not robots, of course they can have a preference. It's not like 'professionals' can't be corrupt, history tells us corruption occurs everywhere.
Definite media bias against Chelsea before the game. Pundits were rating Conte as the Spurs Oracle and disrespecting Tuchel. I don't agree that Chelsea need a new striker. A non mobile striker who rarely touches the ball does not suit the way Chelsea play, it was obvious from last season. We remember the media outcry and Tuchel dropping Lukaku after his 7 touches v Palace. Haaland's 8 touches virtually escapes analysis. It looked like Havertz was playing from the right while it was Sterling who was playing the false nine. Give Sterling time to adjust. Havertz had a bad miss but so did Kane. Media darling Haaland missed a bigger sitter in the Charity shield, it happens. Almost every pundit was writing off Chelsea as the lesser team before the game and now look foolish. Chelsea totally outplayed Spurs in every department. If they can keep this level of performance then they should fear no one. Proud!
Remember when there was a big hit on shirt pulling in the box at corners? Stoke used to get hammered on that when we were in the Premier league. So why not the hair pulling? Also, would it be stamped on in the women's game?
Chelsea had the better of the game and spurs hung in there with anything they got, which is a typical Conte team at the end of the day, that game was great, proper passion managers giving it the big licks without over doing it, and handling it like men and keeping the media at bay, we are not robots and never will be while we fight for our freedoms, passion is the sport and a big reason why it's loved
Simon Jordan is 100% wrong. Richarlison is offside as the ball is shot. He is clearly obstructing the view of the goalkeeper for at least some time during the balls trajectory toward goal. Therefore he DOES have an impact from an offside position. That is as simple as it gets. Also it is clear some officials have an agenda against Chelsea, and it's more than likely some at the FA are complicit in this as they keep selecting this Referee to give unfair rulings against Chelsea.
As a spurs fan I can honestly say chelsea deserved to and shouldve won 2-0. There was a clear foul in the build up to the first goal and also an offside, Richarlison played the ball as it went past him. There shouldnt have been a retake of the corner for the second goal, it shouldve been a free kick to chelsea for the clear foul on cucarella. Happy with the free point though!!
That was only a "clear foul" on Havertz if you're in favour of football becoming an ENTIRELY non contact sport. There was one camera angle which clearly showed that contact had been made with the ball. Richarlison didn't make any contact with the ball and had he done so would immediately of been given as offside.
If it were any other official you pick around the world in yesterday's CheTot game.... they'd give a free-kick to Chelsea for pulling Cucurella's hair. Card might not be shown, but a foul for sure. The first Tot goal can be debated, but the foul on Cucurella is as clear as black and white. Simon Jordan, explain how pulling one's hair is not deemed as a foul?
On the arteta klopp thing last year...mane ft fouled our RB just before that and the ref never blew go watch the replay...it's a foul...arteta reacted how anybody would and the Liverpool fans got behind the team...not that big a deal but a foul is a foul unles it's Liverpool ofcourse..had arsenal done the same to salah klopp would have done exactly the same
Jordan is wrong. Because the spurs player is standing there in an offside portion the keeper doesn’t know if he we’ll touch the ball so it prevents him committing 100% to the dive.
Spurs are improved & so are Arsenal but neither is anywhere near the top 3 clubs...... I enjoyed all the talk this week that Chelsea were as dead as Man Utd & Spurs fans & Pundits w/ chest saying they'll dominate Chelsea & win by 3 goals as they lay down a marker for a Title challenge...... I like Conte a great deal but PL pundits & fans wildly overrate him..... If he's got the best talent he'll Win but if he doesnt he wont - same as any other Mngr
@@francissmalls3882 no but I will see them win the prem this or next season it not us fans or the club it is the media, Chelsea thought they had three points in bag, due to our record at their ground, it didn't happen mate.
Ppl fail to understand that you can have all the possession you want. Play all the fancy football you want. Pass all the eye tests. At the end of the day kane put the ball in the back of the net and your attack didn’t. 3 shots on target from 16 is not a good game
Mendy can clearly see the ball but he’s looking round the spurs player, all Mendy knows is there is a spurs player in front of him, so he can’t dive until that ball goes past richarlison incase richalison tries to get the ball. 100 % should be disallowed
Tottenham were embarrassed yesterday. They were completely outplayed. The refs robbed Chelsea and these clowns talking about gaps closing. SMH. The refs are bringing the sport into disrepute.
Anthony Taylor is incompetent and this is a direct reflection of the complete institutional incompetence of Premier League refereeing in general. The FA is a joke...always has been...always will be.
excellent point...... no conspiracy - that would actually be interesting & require high level brain horse power...... unfortunately it's just the same old Institutional incompetence & corruption
It's as simple as this... Whenever there's a debate on whether it's a goal or not then the goal should have been disallowed. When an actual goal is scored then there shouldn't be a reason for a debate. The fact there is a debate tells everyone that it wasn't a goal.
Not a Chelsea fan but a football fan and tuchel was right to say how he feels I think more managers should call out refs tbh the refs in EPL are pathetic
See how they watered I’m down comment about this ref’s decision… should this happened to City or Liverfool? Taylor shouldn’t be officiating Chelsea’s games he is dodgy and handed this draw to Spurs on a silver platter.
The English FA is a disgrace and it was quite predictable that they would stand behind their incompetent referee (Andy Tailor or whatever his name is). Anyway, very proud of Chelsea yesterday cos everybody wrote them off before the game despite having a history of dominating Tottenham in the history of this fixture.
The Chelsea fans crying over that first goal is pathetic. It wasn't even a foul on Havertz, and Richarlison wasn't interfering with play and if they could defend a corner properly they'd have won the game. Stop whinging.
The gap hasn’t closed, Chelsea were the much better side . However I’m pleased with the grit and determination the players showed to get something out of the game . Spurs may well get 4TH again we will see … however we won’t be any higher than that.
spurs came out and said it was an emotional game, that wasnt spurs playing there we both know that. they can bring alot more than that but bc it was chelsea there was alot more emotion and pressure wanting to get something from the game. i reckon we have closed the gap, last season we beat city twice and drew to liverpool twice. we took a combined 10 points from them last season. we are still well within reach.
@@jackwithonej5351 I think we are the best of the rest but still believe City , Liverpool and Chelsea are ahead of us . I do agree we can play much much better than we showed yesterday though , it was always going to be a difficult game full of tension and emotion simply because it’s been so long since we got a win at the Bridge , indeed against Chelsea full stop . I am not deriding our club when I say the teams I mentioned are better , it’s simply my opinion . I still think Spurs will have a good season , how can we not with the emotional , passionate and determined Conte in charge ❓. COYS 💙🫶🏻
What will it take to improve the standards of officiating ? because it can't continue like it is even after all the mistakes season after season there's too much riding on EPL games yeah I know they're only human so can someone please tell exactly what is V.A.R for because it seems to me it only works for certain teams my point is there's way too many inconsistencies.
@@jasonmusicka8271 not sure about you but if someone pulls me to the ground by my hair I would react slightly differently to pulling my shirt. One is assault
@@jasonmusicka8271 you tell me which would you prefer some drag you to the floor by you hair or someone pulls you shirt. Personally if someone did that to me I would plant him, girls pull hair.
@@MrJudgementday99 its don't matter how you get pulled to the ground the principle is still the same mate. Maybe if he didn't have a stupid hair cut he would of grabbed his shirt instead lol. But I still find it funny that nobody is talking about cucurella stamping on romero very early in the game
Ars3nal fans used to say Mike Dean was a Spurs fan , every time he was chosen for a NLD , knowing they would put him under pressure to give them the better of decisions , and invariably he did .
Anthony Taylor all the time if it's a big day for Chelsea football club is a shameful corruption on it's own........ therefore those old pundits are part and parcel of the rotten English football ...... nowonder the not chosen to officiate at this year's world.
Bro thats bullshit. The first wasnt a foul and even if it was it had no impact on the play. The second one may have been a foul but it was before the corner that spurs scored from. Blame chelseas poor Defending
@@sui2529 do u know what u talking about? U should have ask me how first. When there is a player offside obstructing the keeper is a goal allow? 2. The pulling of the hair happens during the first corner kick that lead to the second one the Kane scored. Get ur fact right before calling someone comments bullshit
If they don’t believe there is a ‘vendetta’ against certain clubs ie Anthony Taylor and Mike dean against Chelsea, then those who say that, aren’t looking at the argument and not paying attention because it doesn’t effect their club. Until it does then they might wake up.
What the hell this simon guy on about? Chelsea fans say Anthony Taylor just cant ref a fair match for us If you have enough memory and brain capacity (as a football journalist) you can remember many similar dodgy decisions throughout the years against Chelsea when he is the referee.
As a Liverpool fan i’m not inclined to side with Chelski, but that was absolute robbery yesterday. Better side by a mile. What is VAR there for if not to catch stuff like hair pulling. It’s a joke. Too many people in control, who have never played the game.
Great tackle by Romero
I as a Spurs fan have to say I agree, we got stomped and I'm not complaining about the fact we pulled of the heist if the century for a point, did it at Leicester, did it at Ajax, did it at Chelsea.
We have had so many times we've been robbed by ref's or VAR but if we don't all hold it to the same standard then we can't expect it to improve. It's purpose is to overturn wrong decisions or to have the referee review previous incidents. If it wasn't doing that then WHAT WAS IT DOING???
Still, believe it or not it wasn't just Spurs getting away with stuff, felt like the ref was almost overcorrecting his bias from the noise of the bridge because so many times he made terrible calls and it happened for both sides. Still I don't want to entirely blame him because once again WHERE IS VAR???
Too much money being made. There’s no coincidence
Although I agree Chelsea were the better team by a mile & deserved to win, but VAR doesn't step in to correct all decisions within the game. The hair pulling was checked for violent conduct, which it isn't as per the current law. I think, the Richarlison decision was a definite offside though, because the keeper has to factor in a deflection from Richarlison before diving for the original shot.
I do agree as a Spurs fan, but we have been on the receiving end when Terry handled the ball into the goal in the league cup final. Swings and roundabouts!
Shocking from the ref and VAR
and the linesman...even the ref had to over rule him and give Chelsea the stonewall corner which the blind bat standing three metres away wanted to give as a Spurs goalkick
Saudi run the premier league and the Chinese marketing make millions every week
VAR? Romero should have been sent off for gently caressing a shemale's hair?
@@dannyneville1310 The gentle caress in question:
Something I hear every week to be honest.
Chelsea were by far the best side . I thought it would be a closer match and as a spurs fan I’ve no problem saying that. As for the ref , I see why Chelsea fans are calling him out . On the flip side Chelsea should have taken their chances and missed a couple of sitters . Spurs weren’t lucky, they just didn’t give up . If Chelsea had defended the Kane goal properly they’d have won . A good point for us away .
I thought chelsea didn't create a great deal of goal scoring opportunities. Even so, a very strong performance for chelsea and unlucky they didn't win
Spurs is just an overrated team to be honest. Did you just say Spurs weren't lucky?? You played nothing all match. You only had 2 goals due to corruption. This is like saying the Son of Bill Gates became the president of Microsoft through Hard work
Well, by that logic, harry kane should've buried his chance. It should call for the ref to punish spurs?
@@limofootball yeah he should have. I agree. But Chelsea played better than us. And even if Kane had scored it shouldn’t have made a difference if you’d taken your chances. Which you didn’t. That’s how it goes sometimes
@@ibstudiosHD we weren’t lucky. We scored 2 goals and got a draw. Chelsea should have won but you didn’t. That’s the way the cookie crumbles. We can go back and forth all day but if you don’t take your chances what do you expect. As for being overrated , that’s just your anger and disappointment talking.
I absolutely loved what happened between the managers. Next time Tottenham play Chelsea it's gonna be either balls to the wall action or 1 side blasting the other
Wow congrats on predicting both sides of the coin.
@@voetbal12 obviously you don't know anything otherwise you'd know it could also be a meek muted draw
Anthony Taylor won't be there to assist you.
@Rey Orozco spuds is ya dad
Chelsea were miles ahead yesterday. Spurs had 12 players on the pitch including the ref. The stats don’t lie and Chelsea were better in every department.
In the first half they were, much more even contest once Richarlison came on. All that possession, and only 3 shots on target, seems wasteful to me. Chelsea aren't that far ahead.
I agree Chelsea better side, but the only stat that matters is the score.
Every department except goals scored 🤓
So what you’re saying is Spurs are now very resilient and mentally strong. They don’t give up ?
Negative Nancy , Sour grapes , Moody Margret , Stay Salty ,
You cant blame the ref for missing the hair pulling, if you watch the replay from behind the goal you can see he's looking at the ball at the near post. The blame goes to VAR for not checking it and advising the ref to go over to the monitor. That being said Chelsea did fail to defend the corner. The first goal is a clear offside, Mendy has his weight on his left leg having to look around Richarlason, who's directly in the vision of the keeper, the ball goes to his right which is why hes so slow to dive as he has to redirect his weight to go the oppersite direction. Plus the minute Richarlason moves his body so the ball goes around him he becomes active which is what I thought was the rules of offside.
It's annoying that people always find it difficult to be honest and take responsibility.
I'm sure everyone knew what caused all the drama. FA, REF and VAR are just corrupt like hell. Take it or leave it
Let's be honest tho we only kick up hell when it suits us sometimes we need to call it all out
@@fifty-five6929 you right but it always go against Chelsea most of time. But that game is a disgrace to EPL
Problem is you can’t keep giving the same referee in high profile games for chelsea. Enough is enough. I am fine if some other ref messes up, but if the same guy does it again and again you need change
Never been a great fan of Souness but he doesn’t deserve the stick he’s getting after what he said last night, what he said was completely right after all there were no women on the pitch, if he said it during a womens game then you have an argument but otherwise leave the man alone
What did he say?
@@liamfred9011 he said it was a man's game. People getting their knickers in a twist because Karen Carney was sitting next to him.
@@liamfred9011 he was doing post match analysis sat next to Karen Carney (ex England womens footballer) and he was talking about how the refs aren’t giving free kicks for diving which led to no one trying to dive and he said that’s the way it should be “it’s a man’s game” and he got a load of abuse on twitter for it but got a lot of support as well
@@Danimal13 The feminists and woke brigade literally getting their knickers/mankini's in a twist, over a comment he made...that they heard out of context to what he meant!
It is a mans game and always will be
Spurs showed a lot of character and heart but we were completely outplayed and deserved to lose. Tuchel's tactics were brilliant and we got completely overrun in midfield
But we didn't lose. Football isn't about who deserves what, its about winning.
@@jimhotspur1574 yeah. And you didn’t.
@@jimhotspur1574 Yes but there are only so many times you can get lucky like that. You can't play a season like that, it will catch up with us
@@jimhotspur1574 well said mate 👍
@@goldboy150 yeah and we didn't lose, you had 90 minutes and you didn't beat us, we had five shots at your goal, your mob had 3 shots at our goal, so if all goals went in, then we would have won, if the boot was on the other foot, you would not moaning like a child. So keep quiet unless you have constructive statement to make🤫🤐
Hanging on to take an incredibly lucky, very scrappy point against Chelsea after having been dominated for the entire game isn't what I would call 'closing the gap'. For me it's like saying that West brom are now title contenders because they beat Chelsea 5-2 and drew 3-3. Tottenham's signings are average at best, the players they had prior are average at best, and they've just done very average against Chelsea. Baffles me that people are hyping them up this much
@@User-ei7eo he's absolutely correct wether or not he's a Chelsea fan, and I hate Chelsea 😁
Before the game Chelsea was lucky to gain anything from this fixture, the bubbles burst. Tottenhams still a shambles nearly being outscored by a team without a striker
Wow man you sound incredibly salty 😂
Negative Nancy , Sour grapes , Moody Margret , Stay Salty ,
Anthony Taylor is so biased against chelsea. Look at his track record in games against us ffs
Yeah so biased that he didn't punish Cucurella for deliberately stamping on Romero's leg in the first 10 mins
@@terrydavid5671 didn’t give the foul on cucurella. Didn’t send maguire off for kicking batshuayi in the nuts, didn’t give a penalty when maguire held azpi down in the box. Gave a free kick in tottenhams favour when gazaniga missed the ball and clattered into alonso.
@@maths1357 And not forgetting Kieta's deliberate elbow into Daves head in last years cup final!
@@terrydavid5671 lol. What game were you watching? If you want to see a deliberate stamp that went unpunished in this fixture, incidentally the same referee I believe, have a look at lo celso on azpilicueta two seasons ago.
@@trevorgibb1019 that was mane but your point stands. Keita should of been sent off in the league cup final for a wreckless studs up to the groin area challenge on chalobah, not sure if that was Taylor or not, I think it may have been one of the other incompetent match fixing fucks
All the best to souness btw. Getting destroyed by the PC brigade because he said it's a man's game, while commenting on a men's game. Shame on people. I stand with souness
Knew it was coming, as soon as he said it.
Is it not just a game? There's hardly any men in football.
Is he getting grief online? I've never seen anything but knew it was coming! Absolutely pathetic, he was commenting on a man's game and i agreed with it all
@@srciano1 yep. I just chuckled and thought to myself, well that's a shame because they're gonna come for him now hahahaha.
@@IamTheStormThatIsApproaching1 wonder if he will be sacked 😂
More Spurs supporters at TalkSport than Chelsea supporters... Clearly. They got battered simple as that. Media trying to make out Spurs are the next Madrid 🤣
But we are ? are you okay ? 🤣
Spurs fans need a nappy change...the bullsh▪︎▪︎t that comes out there mouth daily is hilarious.
What ? Y’all chelsea fans are still butthurt from Real Madrid defeat
Facts
They still got a point though. Last year this would have ended 2-0.
I won’t go as far as to suggest that Taylor has some sort of agenda against us but he constantly makes bad calls when officiating our matches. He sent Kovacic off for getting his foot stepped on by Xhaka in the FA cup final. Just a bad ref, can’t believe he’s going to be officiating at the World Cup.
Cmon bro surely he has some agenda against us
Numerous games especially against big teams when his decisions have cost us in some way
Those are just a few you named mate, there are probably a lot more. In fact I’ve seen UA-cam videos of most of his errors against us.
@@ktbffh_cf How come Tuchel ( yellow carded when Spurs scored their first equalizer ) didn't get sent off in the 76th minute for running 50 meters outside of his technical area - instant yellow card offense ?
Chelsea undefeated in their last 11 matches Taylor has been the referee....
@@JMartComedy what does that have to do with bad calls? You can win a match and also have a ref make bad calls against you during the match.
Chelsea were significantly better. It’s obvious to anyone who saw the game that the score didn’t reflect that, so how can anyone in all seriousness ask such a one sided question?!!
what was the score
Well said!
Chelsea had 3 shots on target compared to Spurs 5 , ball possession doesn't win football matches Ten ( 67% against Brentford ) Hag will confirm this .
Who cares , game finished 2-2
Congratulations on your "Chelsea were significantly better" trophy, enjoy your point 🤣
Ben Foster, an actually goalie, who is a SPURS fan, said it's a clear offside. Nothing more needs to be said.
That's funny..I'm sure I saw him in an aresnal shirt the other day...a proper spurs fan wouldn't wear a woolwhich shirt!!!!
It's so many years that Anthony Taylor always tries to drag Chelsea FC down. The funny thing is everyone supported him. The FA are always ready to counter argue on every facts Chelsea came up. There can't be good or bad days for a referee as far as Anthony Taylor is concern because it goes on for quite too long. Is he have a vendetta towards Chelsea FC? I really wonder.
"This is a team of fighters who will not give up" until a final or semi-final
Losing doesn't mean you've given up
Honestly the bias is laughable
I don't understand how any of the Spurs goals can be determined to be favours from Anthony Taylor or there's been an Anthony Taylor agenda against Chelsea in this game.
The tackle on Havertz was questionable or a certain foul from the initial tv angle as I wondered how Bentancur had got away with that, however if you see the replays from the referee's angle its not a foul...clearly got the ball hence the play carried on. The Spurs goal that goes in 45 seconds later (if its going to be ruled out) has to be ruled out by the linesman or VAR for interference / obstruction from Richarlison. Neither of which happened so nothing to do with Anthony Taylor.
Likewise the Cucurella / Romero incident is a foul / red card which I can only assume that Taylor hasn't seen as he's probably watching the flight of the ball, so again the referee has to be reliant on VAR. The fact that the replay of that incident was shown multiple times before the next corner was taken would suggest that VAR were checking it but they didn't invite the referee to check it himself via the monitor. Again... ultimately nothing to do with Anthony Taylor.
If there are questions to be answered it's perhaps around VAR
Spurs were fortunate for the point, Chelsea were unlucky not to take all three but that is football. As everybody knows these things tend to even themselves out over a season.
Seems to be too much coincidences when it concerns us and Anthony Taylor.
Thing is anthony taylor is ALWAYS involved when these things happen vs chelsea. Id wager that VAR notified him of all and he said no. Either that or it is actually the FA that plans these robberies in advance(which i believe). Why else would taylor be refereeing chelsea every time they have a big game knowing their past? There is something fishy here. Corruption can be found in any walk of life in every single country and society, but somehow professional english football is clean?? The serie a wasn't... The premier league isn't either and it is high time refs paid for their crimes
Cucurella was trying the face towards and hold the opponent rather than face the ball. This was outlawed some time ago. This was before Romero pulled him down so if the ref had seen it then it’s a penalty and then possibly then a red card for Romero for retaliation if it was deemed serious enough although Cucurella wasn’t hurt. James foul on Kane late on when already on a yellow was a close call for a second yellow not mentioned and Spurs didn’t make a fuss just got on with it. Chelsea also glossed over the push in the back of Kulu when they won the ball for their second goal and again no whinging from Spurs.
finally someone intelligent here! its shocking how many people actually think he hates chelsea. the reason he gets so many big games involving clubs such as chelsea is because he is such a good referee. that said, the romero incident shouldve been red. also the first spurs goal i honestly think stands. as for the goal (im a spurs fan so im going to be a bit biased) i personally believe should stand. richarlison is too far to have any impact and mendy has a clear line of sight to the ball. as for the foul i personally think its a great tackle and bentancur clearly gets the ball. its too far back to rule out tho.
@@thelittleowl1 it's probably not obvious from my post but I'm a Spurs fan too. I think football fans at times (not specifically Chelsea fans I must add) struggle to look at games objectively and likewise the incidents within games in isolation so come to the natural conclusion that there's an agenda in play due to some sort of history with a given referee.
However that's not to say that all referee's are unbiased and honest in each game but I genuinely didn't see anything in this game that suggested Taylor was playing up and favouring Spurs over Chelsea. It would be interesting to see all the Taylor incidents that have impacted Chelsea in recent years listed in one place so the non Chelsea fans can make their own minds up.
I don't understand why referees are not questioned or suspended for bad refereeing.
Can we all be honest to ourselves for once! It’s offside and a foul pulling down a man by his hair! What is so difficult about saying it is wrong and it should never had happened the way it did? Smh….
Simon spot on, hair pulling isn’t violent conduct and as ball wasn’t in play there could be no foul given.
Sure Souness encountered bias in Scotland but it was for his team so he doesn’t recognise it.
Jim must also be suffering with memory loss on bias, he’s forgotten the Cadette signing scandal amongst other bias?
I keep hearing this “Ball wasn’t in play”. But that’s factually incorrect, the corner had been taken when the hair pull happened. Forget VAR and red cards, the ref is looking at it from 5 yards away, clear as day. He should do his job, give the foul and that second corner never happens.
@@Graziak5 the ball wasn't in play when he pulled his hair so it wasn't a foul.
@@bfb187 Incorrect, anything that happens from the time the referee enters the field of play until the match officials depart is subject to the laws of the game.
@@brianbates212 yes and the law states a foul can only be given when the ball is in play unless its violent conduct. That's why Simon points out pulling hair is not classed as violent conduct in the laws of the game.
@@bfb187 go watch the highlights back, I’ve watched them numerous times. The kick had been taken and was almost at the near post by the time the hair was pulled. There’s no doubt about that, it’s not even close
Hello there, is there any particular reason that they remove the full podcast of youtube? Is there anywhere i can find the full podcast to watch/listen to?
Should Tuchel be saying and stating the obvious? Of course he should, it’s not first time that Anthony Taylor and probably some other officials have done us wrong. As Tuchel stated it’s clear that every Chelsea fan, Tuchel himself and even the players know something is wrong regards to his decisions and other officials as a matter of fact which shows how bad the situation is. The problem really isn’t just with yesterday’s decision, it’s that things like this happen often and NOT JUST TO CHELSEA let me be clear. I’ve seen videos of him making awful decisions in other games too.
Just so I get this straight, if pulling the hair of another player is not violent conduct, I can just pull the hair of any opposition player whenever I want if the referee isn’t looking at me? According to the rules pulling hair is not a red card offense so VAR cannot do anything about it and neither can they recommend the referee to give a foul or yellow card since that’s not their domain. Every player should now sneakingly pull opposition players’ hair when the referee is looking somewhere else.
Ridiculous.
Violent conduct or, when using it to pull the player to the ground unexpectedly could easily be interpreted as endangering an opponent; both of which ARE red card offenses.
Doesn't even need to be sneakily apparently. Within 4 yards of the corrupt official is perfectly acceptable
He isn't always right, but I like Souness on this show. Loved the "scenes" and tgat Xonte and Tuchel quickly moved on.
How can u fine tuchel for bad officiating...shocking
That hair pull was right in front of the ref. Atrocious decision.
@Chris Cairns: But the ball was not in play!!
Gap beginning to close? They looked horrible for about 70 minutes of that game. We completely dominated them.
And still drew 😂😂😂😂 yes you dominated but you bottled it against serial bottlers sooooo jokes on you not us 😂😂
That's the point though isn't it. Spurs didn't turn up, played as bad as I've seen since, probably against Wolves last season, and took a point at a ground we always play terrible at.
Once Richarlison, Bissouma and Perisic came on there was no difference at all. Need to stop playing the victim and move on.
United also dominated brentford for 90 minutes but got 4 goals 🤷♂️
@@probinson6111 finally someone who talks sense 😂😂😂 these chelsea fans are so bitter mate it’s brilliant aha tactical masterclass but drew 2-2 due to contes tactically genius subs😂🤷🏽♂️ Simple as that
@@xylope3384 ok I dunno what game you was watching but United didn’t dominate a single minute of that game vs brentford! 😂😂😂
It’s okay to agree as a spurs fan that Chelsea outplayed us. Not every battle will be easy even for the best teams (eg psg, Chelsea, Liverpool vs Real Madrid in the champions league). What fans appreciate is the improvement in the mentality and work rate. We really didn’t lie down and get beat we worked hard to get a draw when we would have usually lost it
Simon said the first goal wasn't a problem because Mendy didn't complain bout it. But feels coaches should be fined more because they complained and have high salary.
He's a Chelsea hater
Their fight was similar to Sir Alex and Arsen on the touchline
BLOODY HELL, this IS something we WANT TO SEE every week!!
Definently when it involves Chelsea😂😂, can't wait until they come to our ground, the atmosphere will be electric and we will win that game... COME ON YOU SPURS.
Even if Richarlison was not directly in the line of Mendy’s sight he is still very close to the ball as it comes in and Mendy has to anticipate that he could kick the ball and change the direction of the shot therefore has to delay his dive which means that Richarlison is interfering with play so it is 100% an offside goal and shouldn’t have stood.
Frankly, I don't understand the concept that it's talking about, if it's an offside then it should be an offside, no need to judge the goalkeeper's movement or anything else because when Sterling's goal last week was ruled out for offside then it was offside, we take it
I think we should not use double standards in analyzing it
anyway I'm just a fan who is proud to see the team continue to work hard to improve performance to get the results
the gap has closed a bare minimum.. if the ref actually was neutral it would be 2-0 and what would we be saying about the gap ? the ref had a masterclass for tottenham and people think the gap has closed
This morning, sky sports showed Mendy’s position to look at the ball. He had to lean to the left to be able to see the ball, reason it took to much time to lean to the right to make the stop and Richarlison moved to then right to hide the ball as it was going towards goal. Now tell me he wasn’t implied in the play and wasn’t offside. Check the goal from all angles before you make a decision.
Anthony Taylor is a joke and shouldn't ever ref a Chelsea game again
Youi misspelled Premier League...
I wonder why ref and this so called stupid VAR always get away with there errors and mistakes,.. this can't go on😡😡
If a manager sees something unfair or wrong as he sees it then he has to speak uo and defend he's team
Bentancur's tackle on Havertz was clear tackle by one toe... and If somebody pulls my hair for one second stopping the match, will i fall?No.... And hojberg goal could have been blocked but nobody did.... 🤷🏾♂️ it was a steal point like any other game, that's it. Referee was not biased... Chelsea dominated but they had just unlucky game whereas Spurs didn't give up.💪🏾
Lmao Chelsea won the champs league 2 years ago, Tottenham getting a result doesn’t reduce the gaping whole of a gap
How about the FA taking Tuchels comments onboard and have a look at Anthony Taylor? Not only was he incompetent in this game but his history when reffing Chelsea does withstand close scrutiny. It cant just be general ineptitude. You have to wonder whether he should be refereeing at this level?
Not sure why people can't accept the fact that referees CAN be biased for and against certain clubs, it's not some conspiracy theory, they're humans not robots, of course they can have a preference. It's not like 'professionals' can't be corrupt, history tells us corruption occurs everywhere.
Definite media bias against Chelsea before the game. Pundits were rating Conte as the Spurs Oracle and disrespecting Tuchel.
I don't agree that Chelsea need a new striker. A non mobile striker who rarely touches the ball does not suit the way Chelsea play, it was obvious from last season. We remember the media outcry and Tuchel dropping Lukaku after his 7 touches v Palace. Haaland's 8 touches virtually escapes analysis. It looked like Havertz was playing from the right while it was Sterling who was playing the false nine. Give Sterling time to adjust. Havertz had a bad miss but so did Kane. Media darling Haaland missed a bigger sitter in the Charity shield, it happens. Almost every pundit was writing off Chelsea as the lesser team before the game and now look foolish. Chelsea totally outplayed Spurs in every department. If they can keep this level of performance then they should fear no one. Proud!
Remember when there was a big hit on shirt pulling in the box at corners? Stoke used to get hammered on that when we were in the Premier league. So why not the hair pulling? Also, would it be stamped on in the women's game?
Chelsea had the better of the game and spurs hung in there with anything they got, which is a typical Conte team at the end of the day, that game was great, proper passion managers giving it the big licks without over doing it, and handling it like men and keeping the media at bay, we are not robots and never will be while we fight for our freedoms, passion is the sport and a big reason why it's loved
'2 or 3 minutes before the goal'
It was 44 seconds Souness
Simon Jordan is 100% wrong. Richarlison is offside as the ball is shot. He is clearly obstructing the view of the goalkeeper for at least some time during the balls trajectory toward goal. Therefore he DOES have an impact from an offside position. That is as simple as it gets. Also it is clear some officials have an agenda against Chelsea, and it's more than likely some at the FA are complicit in this as they keep selecting this Referee to give unfair rulings against Chelsea.
Literally neither spurs goals should have counted
He got the ball mate clearly.. move on with it..
@@joemolla3858 he is referring to offsides and hair pull.
It should have been 4 -5 goals to chelsea
@@eiler1987 well tell Koulibaly and ur team to learn how to defend then we can talk
@@joemolla3858 if it was so clear then why can no one agree on it?
@@Cristian12883 Chelsea have a world class defense and it’ll show over the season, Spurs have a bunch of bums at the bacm
Wait pulling someone to the ground by their hair isn’t VIOLENT MISCONDUCT?!!!!
To be fair as a Spurs fan if either of those goals were against us i would be fuming
Closed gap?? Chelsea still doesn't have a striker unlike spurs so what you saying? If Chelsea had a striker spurs would have gotten 5 or 6
As a spurs fan I can honestly say chelsea deserved to and shouldve won 2-0. There was a clear foul in the build up to the first goal and also an offside, Richarlison played the ball as it went past him. There shouldnt have been a retake of the corner for the second goal, it shouldve been a free kick to chelsea for the clear foul on cucarella. Happy with the free point though!!
That was only a "clear foul" on Havertz if you're in favour of football becoming an ENTIRELY non contact sport. There was one camera angle which clearly showed that contact had been made with the ball. Richarlison didn't make any contact with the ball and had he done so would immediately of been given as offside.
@@MisAnnThorpe nah, he went through havertz to get a stud on the ball, it's clearly a foul.
Would seem it’s not clearly a foul as refs have been briefed to key more go
Have you heard the word 'Competivity' before? This must be a New word of the day by Simon Jordan for competitiveness.
I quite enjoyed feisty encounter with Tuchel & Conte than whole match.
If it were any other official you pick around the world in yesterday's CheTot game.... they'd give a free-kick to Chelsea for pulling Cucurella's hair. Card might not be shown, but a foul for sure. The first Tot goal can be debated, but the foul on Cucurella is as clear as black and white.
Simon Jordan, explain how pulling one's hair is not deemed as a foul?
I'm a Spura fan and Chelsea were by far the better team and we got very very lucky yesterday no other way of seeing it
We did, but how many times results went thier way against us, let's enjoy watching them whinge like kids...😂😂
On the arteta klopp thing last year...mane ft fouled our RB just before that and the ref never blew go watch the replay...it's a foul...arteta reacted how anybody would and the Liverpool fans got behind the team...not that big a deal but a foul is a foul unles it's Liverpool ofcourse..had arsenal done the same to salah klopp would have done exactly the same
Jordan is wrong. Because the spurs player is standing there in an offside portion the keeper doesn’t know if he we’ll touch the ball so it prevents him committing 100% to the dive.
No bias! Spurs drew with Chelsea with the help from the referee and VAR !!!!
This spurs side has to be the most overhyped team in prem history. It's like the media is desperate for them to win something 😂
Bit like your team in recent season and it's only going to get worse...
Spurs are improved & so are Arsenal but neither is anywhere near the top 3 clubs...... I enjoyed all the talk this week that Chelsea were as dead as Man Utd & Spurs fans & Pundits w/ chest saying they'll dominate Chelsea & win by 3 goals as they lay down a marker for a Title challenge...... I like Conte a great deal but PL pundits & fans wildly overrate him..... If he's got the best talent he'll Win but if he doesnt he wont - same as any other Mngr
@@rickysorhaindo1359 were you even born the last time you won a trophy 👀😂
@@francissmalls3882 no but I will see them win the prem this or next season it not us fans or the club it is the media, Chelsea thought they had three points in bag, due to our record at their ground, it didn't happen mate.
@@rickysorhaindo1359 well come back to this discussion in May and see if its another season with no trophies
Tottenham failed to close the gap but FA did it for them.
Chelsea showing that there's levels to this. Spurs and Arsenal have to catch up
Ppl fail to understand that you can have all the possession you want. Play all the fancy football you want. Pass all the eye tests. At the end of the day kane put the ball in the back of the net and your attack didn’t. 3 shots on target from 16 is not a good game
@@henryibe7665 and yet all you could do is muster a draw with the best premier League striker 😂
@@stickstu2866 you man are sooo rattled that you didn’t win😂😂😂 cry more
Mendy can clearly see the ball but he’s looking round the spurs player, all Mendy knows is there is a spurs player in front of him, so he can’t dive until that ball goes past richarlison incase richalison tries to get the ball. 100 % should be disallowed
Richarlison knew he was offside and would never have tried to affect play...its a goal!!!
@@dyangordon6151 he did affect the goal by being offside 🤡
@@fullclipzzz1278 yet....it's a goal 🤡
@@dyangordon6151 never kicked a ball in your life 🤡
Jim white Spurs are closing the gap hahahahaha Chelsea were miles ahead the ref had a shocker
What was the final score though you drip, that's the only thing that matters. We'll put the rent boys in a spliff when they come to the lane!
The only bad decision was not punishing the hair pull from Romero.
2-2 on a bad for us. Says it all really.
Tottenham were embarrassed yesterday. They were completely outplayed. The refs robbed Chelsea and these clowns talking about gaps closing. SMH. The refs are bringing the sport into disrepute.
the app is having problems again. could not go back and listen to this show....again🤦♂️
Anthony Taylor is incompetent and this is a direct reflection of the complete institutional incompetence of Premier League refereeing in general. The FA is a joke...always has been...always will be.
You were saying that when your former filthy racist captain John Terry was your captain and leader.
excellent point...... no conspiracy - that would actually be interesting & require high level brain horse power...... unfortunately it's just the same old Institutional incompetence & corruption
It's as simple as this... Whenever there's a debate on whether it's a goal or not then the goal should have been disallowed. When an actual goal is scored then there shouldn't be a reason for a debate. The fact there is a debate tells everyone that it wasn't a goal.
Mate i dont know about you but i can see that clip of him running on sky ten years from now on a premier league ad 🤔
Sterling was a very smart move of Tuchel's . Feel like that whirly confusing dynamism is exactly what they needed up front.
Why hasn't one commentator/pundit mentioned the foul on Kulusevski leading up to Chelsea's second goal ??
Jordan is just on the show to disagree with whoever is the football pundit.
Not a Chelsea fan but a football fan and tuchel was right to say how he feels I think more managers should call out refs tbh the refs in EPL are pathetic
See how they watered I’m down comment about this ref’s decision… should this happened to City or Liverfool? Taylor shouldn’t be officiating Chelsea’s games he is dodgy and handed this draw to Spurs on a silver platter.
When has the media ever brought to light all the incidents involving Anthony Taylor and Chelsea yet again it’s getting swept under the carpet
Referees are not gods, they should be held accountable. Stop this nonsense of Tuchle shouldn't make comments about refs.
City always running away with the trophy with the help of Ref
The English FA is a disgrace and it was quite predictable that they would stand behind their incompetent referee (Andy Tailor or whatever his name is). Anyway, very proud of Chelsea yesterday cos everybody wrote them off before the game despite having a history of dominating Tottenham in the history of this fixture.
Chelsea was robbed....closing the gap where??? Is that a joke?
Spurs got lucky and a lot!!!
More like Tuchel had more balls than conte, and conte's side played rugby 🏉
Really? Did you forget about James cynical foul on Son? Romero was a lucky fellow for sure but James made no attempt at ball in that challenge either.
Cucurella Hairpull,Richarlison Offside,Spurs allowed Foul Play..
Simply Suspect Ref/VAR?💀
FA-VARing Spurs in Title Race as LiVARpool falling?😂
The Chelsea fans crying over that first goal is pathetic. It wasn't even a foul on Havertz, and Richarlison wasn't interfering with play and if they could defend a corner properly they'd have won the game.
Stop whinging.
The gap hasn’t closed, Chelsea were the much better side . However I’m pleased with the grit and determination the players showed to get something out of the game . Spurs may well get 4TH again we will see … however we won’t be any higher than that.
spurs came out and said it was an emotional game, that wasnt spurs playing there we both know that. they can bring alot more than that but bc it was chelsea there was alot more emotion and pressure wanting to get something from the game. i reckon we have closed the gap, last season we beat city twice and drew to liverpool twice. we took a combined 10 points from them last season. we are still well within reach.
Chelsea are playing at home and should win, but didn't. Let's see what happens at THS in February
@@ringrosesr1 you lot get battered at your stadium come Feb
@@claudemakelele2856 lets see, if Chufski can't even win in their own stadium against a Spurs side playing badly. No hope come February
@@jackwithonej5351 I think we are the best of the rest but still believe City , Liverpool and Chelsea are ahead of us . I do agree we can play much much better than we showed yesterday though , it was always going to be a difficult game full of tension and emotion simply because it’s been so long since we got a win at the Bridge , indeed against Chelsea full stop . I am not deriding our club when I say the teams I mentioned are better , it’s simply my opinion . I still think Spurs will have a good season , how can we not with the emotional , passionate and determined Conte in charge ❓. COYS 💙🫶🏻
What will it take to improve the standards of officiating ? because it can't continue like it is even after all the mistakes season after season there's too much riding on EPL games yeah I know they're only human so can someone please tell exactly what is V.A.R for because it seems to me it only works for certain teams my point is there's way too many inconsistencies.
I can’t for the life of me understand why a player stays on the pitch if they pull someone to the ground by their hair
It's no different to shirt pulling and that happens all the time
@@jasonmusicka8271 not sure about you but if someone pulls me to the ground by my hair I would react slightly differently to pulling my shirt. One is assault
So you don't care the Chelsea player also had the guys shirt 🤔 that would also be classed as assault
@@jasonmusicka8271 you tell me which would you prefer some drag you to the floor by you hair or someone pulls you shirt. Personally if someone did that to me I would plant him, girls pull hair.
@@MrJudgementday99 its don't matter how you get pulled to the ground the principle is still the same mate. Maybe if he didn't have a stupid hair cut he would of grabbed his shirt instead lol. But I still find it funny that nobody is talking about cucurella stamping on romero very early in the game
Ars3nal fans used to say Mike Dean was a Spurs fan , every time he was chosen for a NLD , knowing they would put him under pressure to give them the better of decisions , and invariably he did .
If TT is getting investigated what about Anthony Taylor, is he getting rewarded instead
Anthony Taylor all the time if it's a big day for Chelsea football club is a shameful corruption on it's own........ therefore those old pundits are part and parcel of the rotten English football ...... nowonder the not chosen to officiate at this year's world.
Never close, both 2 goals of Spurs were all flops. It's madness that Taylor allows that.
Bro thats bullshit. The first wasnt a foul and even if it was it had no impact on the play. The second one may have been a foul but it was before the corner that spurs scored from. Blame chelseas poor
Defending
@@sui2529 do u know what u talking about? U should have ask me how first. When there is a player offside obstructing the keeper is a goal allow?
2. The pulling of the hair happens during the first corner kick that lead to the second one the Kane scored. Get ur fact right before calling someone comments bullshit
Did he just say hair pulling is not a violent conduct? Or it’s on !!
Tuchel should’ve been booked for legging it outside the technical area
swings and roundabouts Thomas
Simon is partially right about the first goal ... Mendy's view weren't blocked but they was a foul at the beginning of the action against Harvertz
Bentancur touched the ball fist so it wasn't a foul
did Simon ask Mendy ?
Clean tackle by Bentacur, even better when Romero took out Havertz....
Is Graham in the studio or have talksport set him up at home? Anyone know?
Didnt someone stick the Galatasary Flag on the center circle at Fenerbache
If they don’t believe there is a ‘vendetta’ against certain clubs ie Anthony Taylor and Mike dean against Chelsea, then those who say that, aren’t looking at the argument and not paying attention because it doesn’t effect their club. Until it does then they might wake up.
What the hell this simon guy on about?
Chelsea fans say Anthony Taylor just cant ref a fair match for us
If you have enough memory and brain capacity (as a football journalist) you can remember many similar dodgy decisions throughout the years against Chelsea when he is the referee.
Chelsea absolutely owned them
But you drew!!
There’s literally a 6-7 minute video of all the bias decisions against Chelsea has happened for 5+ years nearly even a decade