While I am running 034 and they don’t have a tune without hfpf for stage 3, I can Appreciate IE making tunes available for those who still don’t have a hpfp yet installed, really adds to the suspense of building your car part by part
Thanks. I love being able to show the viewers what kind of performance you can get at each level. That way people can decide for themselves if the money spent is worth the performance gained.
@@VancityAudi Cant wait for the videos. Im actually collecting parts to do some before and after comparisons for my S4 as well. Just picked it up a week ago and in love with the car soo far. Cant wait to start modding it. Your videos have been very inspirational. I appreciate all the hard work you put into not only the information but the video quality too. Top notch !!
The B9 has so much potential. I should trade my CREC powered Q7 for a TRU V6T Q7 and put a TTE710 on it, lol. On the TT710 93 run, what was the boost pressure and timing versus the e85 stock turbo boost pressure and timing?
Not sure if you were serious or just joking, haha. There are no calibrations for the Q7 yet so you'd have to go with custom tuning if that's what you wanted to do. As for the peak timing advance and boost I don't share that stuff seeing as IE has gone to extensive lengths to perfect their tuning of this turbo. Other customers may happily share that info, but I don't think it is fair to. I can tell you that my peak timing is less than a 1/4 of what I saw with the stock turbo on E65 then I did with the TTE710 on their pump gas tunes.
@@VancityAudi Thank you for taking the time to reply. It was just a joke since the Q7 doesn't really fit into the tuner category, hence not much aftermarket support. However, and IMO, a TTE710 Q7 does sounds like a tempting build. A family sleeper SUV that would be an unexpected rival on the drag strip to an SQ7. When asking the question I didn't think of the "proprietary" aspect of boost and tuning values. I appreciate the ratio value of "25 %". This provides a ball-park idea that hints at the potential of the B9 3.0T platform coupled to a TTE710 and that the vehicle configuration is barely breaking a sweat (except for the OE fuel system). I've recently started researching some TTE options for my B5 S4 since they are highly regarded with making some seriously powerful and reliable turbochargers.
@@VancityAudi hard to gauge how much lower this dyno reads than a dynojet and especially with your high DA, I understand you care more about improvements but I’m excited to see improvements in the quarter mile
@@maxpetruccelli5444 well to give a bit more info they usually calculate the hp ratings at the crank on this dyno with a 25% drivetrain loss with how low it reads. Plus now that I have around 40whp more than the Stage 2 E85 tune AND that power gain is right where I need it, I'd say you can expect atleast a 2mph gain in the 1/4 mile.
Good stuff. I think it would have been easier to see the curve on that last graph (stock turbo E85) if you would have dropped the TTE 91 run. With 3 runs on there it's hard to see the power/tq differences with all of them running into each other. Excited to see what this runs now at the strip.
I'll take that into consideration next time out. I wanted to show the 91 run as well because a lot of people only have 91 octane fuel available to them.
Since I will only keep my car on the street I'm thinking Stage 3 isn't worth it for me. For daily driving I love the down low torque from the stock turbo.
@@VancityAudi I look forward that video! Even then I believe the stock turbo always has the advantage of better down low torque. Supposedly the TTE710 makes better torque down low than the TTE810. That's the main tradeoff with going with a "bigger" turbo: low down torque vs higher/broader power band.
@@voop00p Well you are certainly correct there. If all you are concerned about is max torque down low, no aftermarket, larger turbo will improve that. A Stage 2 E65 tune will make some serious torque down low versus what any upgraded turbo can make. You just lose all that power after 5400rpm. To each their own!
That's because they are Mustang uncorrected dyno numbers. Check this video out where I showcased Dynojet calibrated numbers instead: ua-cam.com/video/YQnblUiaAjQ/v-deo.html
Not many people can swallow that pill Adam. All they care about is the #s on a dyno. I will probably never dyno my S4. Numbers on a dyno can vary greatly from one to the next, but ET and trap speed wont change that drastically at your strip. Granted, a track in Colorado vs sea level will have variations, but at you local track, you should be consistant. Last car i had made 500 on one dyno, then without changing anything, made 550 on another. Ran the same speed and ET at the strip though.
Exactly! Dyno's are meant for before and after testing on the same day. They aren't meant to compare to one another in different parts of the world using different fuels, on different brand dynos in different ambient conditions. Yes, racing in different conditions will also greatly affect your performance. I'm referring to what the car will accomplish at sea level in like 0 to 1000DA.
My Stage2 does 414whp with stock turbo, pretty flat to about 5500rpm then it dies off. Lots of money to just have power in the high revs while losing 30% torque down low. I would have thought you would get close to 550-600bhp with a big turbo to compensate for the lag at the bottom.
You can't compare dyno results from one dyno to another, from one part of the world to another. It doesn't work like that. In this video I was showing Mustang dyno numbers, which are INCREDIBLY low. If I had shown you the Dynojet calibration numbers instead, it would have been roughly 500whp & 500wtq.
![500+WHP?! - EPL Tuned Hybrid Turbo Audi B9 S4 hits the dyno! [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8gYGWNZ3-iQ/mqdefault.jpg)
SAVE MONEY ON YOUR INTEGRATED ENGINEERING PURCHASES BY USING THIS LINK:
- performancebyie.com/vancityaudi
While I am running 034 and they don’t have a tune without hfpf for stage 3, I can Appreciate IE making tunes available for those who still don’t have a hpfp yet installed, really adds to the suspense of building your car part by part
Thanks. I love being able to show the viewers what kind of performance you can get at each level. That way people can decide for themselves if the money spent is worth the performance gained.
Nice gains! Thx for filming my corvette in the background and for your ongoing education and entertainment.
You're very welcome. On Friday our race footage drops!
Your car is amazing!
Thanks!
Wow that's a huge result
amazing !! the best channel to inform you about your audi :)
Thanks!
Great content! It’s sad that a lot of people don’t appreciate the real content you and some other guys I watch make. Keep up the good work 👍
Thanks! Ya, a lot of people's opinions of my content were changed over the past few weeks with the stupidity that I was dragged into.
Not bad. Cant wait to see the E85 tune. IE went 9's on the TTE710 so theres definitely more power to be had there.
TONS more power still to come, haha.
@@VancityAudi Cant wait for the videos. Im actually collecting parts to do some before and after comparisons for my S4 as well. Just picked it up a week ago and in love with the car soo far. Cant wait to start modding it. Your videos have been very inspirational. I appreciate all the hard work you put into not only the information but the video quality too. Top notch !!
@@kingblus4x thank you very much for the kind words! Good luck with the build!
nice results! huge gains!
thanks!
awesome! i can't wait to see the 1/4 mile time
that drops on Wednesday!
Thanks for documenting the journey ! B9’s stand up! Lol
you're welcome!
That's what I want to see. What it can do on 1/4 mile with that setup
Video drops on Wednesday!
Cannot wait to see some dragy runs on some e85 on this beast!
I'm trying to get them edited and on the channel for next week!
@@VancityAudi oh boy, I'm excited
The B9 has so much potential. I should trade my CREC powered Q7 for a TRU V6T Q7 and put a TTE710 on it, lol. On the TT710 93 run, what was the boost pressure and timing versus the e85 stock turbo boost pressure and timing?
Not sure if you were serious or just joking, haha. There are no calibrations for the Q7 yet so you'd have to go with custom tuning if that's what you wanted to do. As for the peak timing advance and boost I don't share that stuff seeing as IE has gone to extensive lengths to perfect their tuning of this turbo. Other customers may happily share that info, but I don't think it is fair to. I can tell you that my peak timing is less than a 1/4 of what I saw with the stock turbo on E65 then I did with the TTE710 on their pump gas tunes.
@@VancityAudi Thank you for taking the time to reply. It was just a joke since the Q7 doesn't really fit into the tuner category, hence not much aftermarket support. However, and IMO, a TTE710 Q7 does sounds like a tempting build. A family sleeper SUV that would be an unexpected rival on the drag strip to an SQ7.
When asking the question I didn't think of the "proprietary" aspect of boost and tuning values. I appreciate the ratio value of "25 %". This provides a ball-park idea that hints at the potential of the B9 3.0T platform coupled to a TTE710 and that the vehicle configuration is barely breaking a sweat (except for the OE fuel system). I've recently started researching some TTE options for my B5 S4 since they are highly regarded with making some seriously powerful and reliable turbochargers.
@@pearl04tl I'm now on my 4th TTE turbo and I have loved all of them!
Hard to gauge with this dyno, can’t wait to see it on the track and see what times it can put down
What's hard to gauge?
@@VancityAudi hard to gauge how much lower this dyno reads than a dynojet and especially with your high DA, I understand you care more about improvements but I’m excited to see improvements in the quarter mile
@@maxpetruccelli5444 well to give a bit more info they usually calculate the hp ratings at the crank on this dyno with a 25% drivetrain loss with how low it reads. Plus now that I have around 40whp more than the Stage 2 E85 tune AND that power gain is right where I need it, I'd say you can expect atleast a 2mph gain in the 1/4 mile.
Good stuff. I think it would have been easier to see the curve on that last graph (stock turbo E85) if you would have dropped the TTE 91 run. With 3 runs on there it's hard to see the power/tq differences with all of them running into each other. Excited to see what this runs now at the strip.
I'll take that into consideration next time out. I wanted to show the 91 run as well because a lot of people only have 91 octane fuel available to them.
Being a 2018, does this have updated rocker arms? Ive got 74k on my 2018 and curious about tuning, but every ticking/ping bothers me Lol.
No, it does not. Direct injectors are loud on these cars and always have been. No issues thus far and I have 74,000km.
@@VancityAudi Thank you!
really good video! But in Germany, the 100-200 km/h times are decisive. Can you maybe compare it to 91 octane and 93 octane?
I'll be sharing the 100-200km/h times using their 93 octane tune in the upcoming performance test videos.
how come IE claims the hp to be around 600-700 but you are only getting 400-430?
Because you're looking at the wrong tune on their website and I'm dyno testing the car on an incredibly low reading dyno.
Stock internals??
Yes. I listed every power mod in the video.
@@VancityAudi don’t mind him he should have been aborted.
Since I will only keep my car on the street I'm thinking Stage 3 isn't worth it for me. For daily driving I love the down low torque from the stock turbo.
Once you see my 1/4 mile times I bet you'll be changing your mind. Dyno tests tell you VERY little about the true daily drivability of a car.
@@VancityAudi I look forward that video! Even then I believe the stock turbo always has the advantage of better down low torque. Supposedly the TTE710 makes better torque down low than the TTE810. That's the main tradeoff with going with a "bigger" turbo: low down torque vs higher/broader power band.
@@voop00p Well you are certainly correct there. If all you are concerned about is max torque down low, no aftermarket, larger turbo will improve that. A Stage 2 E65 tune will make some serious torque down low versus what any upgraded turbo can make. You just lose all that power after 5400rpm. To each their own!
If you want more power just rev more. Go electric if you want low end torque
thanks!
you're very welcome!
I feel like this is really low for upgraded turbo.
That's because they are Mustang uncorrected dyno numbers. Check this video out where I showcased Dynojet calibrated numbers instead: ua-cam.com/video/YQnblUiaAjQ/v-deo.html
Not many people can swallow that pill Adam. All they care about is the #s on a dyno. I will probably never dyno my S4.
Numbers on a dyno can vary greatly from one to the next, but ET and trap speed wont change that drastically at your strip.
Granted, a track in Colorado vs sea level will have variations, but at you local track, you should be consistant.
Last car i had made 500 on one dyno, then without changing anything, made 550 on another.
Ran the same speed and ET at the strip though.
Exactly! Dyno's are meant for before and after testing on the same day. They aren't meant to compare to one another in different parts of the world using different fuels, on different brand dynos in different ambient conditions.
Yes, racing in different conditions will also greatly affect your performance. I'm referring to what the car will accomplish at sea level in like 0 to 1000DA.
My Stage2 does 414whp with stock turbo, pretty flat to about 5500rpm then it dies off. Lots of money to just have power in the high revs while losing 30% torque down low. I would have thought you would get close to 550-600bhp with a big turbo to compensate for the lag at the bottom.
You can't compare dyno results from one dyno to another, from one part of the world to another. It doesn't work like that. In this video I was showing Mustang dyno numbers, which are INCREDIBLY low. If I had shown you the Dynojet calibration numbers instead, it would have been roughly 500whp & 500wtq.