the all new 88 Series International Harvester 2+2 Tractors from IH

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 гру 2012
  • the all new 88 Series International Harvester 2+2 Tractors from IH
    TURN THE SOUND UP SOME. :)
    MRJOHNDEERE3720. :) COPYRIGHT 2015
    88 Series International Harvester 2+2 Tractors. It covers the features & benefits of the 3388 & 3588 2+2 Tractors, and the benifits over front articulating 4 Wheel drive tractors. It is from 1979 & is titled "A Great New Way To Grow" & has some awesome acting in it! IF U GUYS WANT THIS DVD 4 URSELF, HERES THE PLACE 2 BUY THEM,, stores.ebay.com/PLOWBOY-EQUIPM...
    THANK U FOR 140,000 VIEWS AND 668 LIKES ON THIS VID. :)
    my instagram- / mrjohndeere3720
    like me on facebook- / mrjd3720
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 115

  • @ox6942
    @ox6942 4 роки тому +4

    Ahh. The glorious "Anteater". Used to run a 3388 2+2. One of my all time favorites. Always be sure to grease the u joints on that one shaft that spins constantly at engine RPM and runs to the back half every day.

  • @deereboy8400
    @deereboy8400 10 років тому +6

    Thanks for uploading this.

  • @chuckwilliams8015
    @chuckwilliams8015 3 роки тому +1

    Great seeing tractor movies ,thanks 👍😊

  • @leosypher9993
    @leosypher9993 2 місяці тому

    "How long have you had it"
    "Oh not too long, just long enough"
    let me tell you, thats about 5 minutes, I love my 3588, these tractors are impressive

  • @Andy-ln6oe
    @Andy-ln6oe Рік тому +1

    I'd give anything to have a 3588, rear duals, and brand new paint and power. Beautiful tractors. Wish Case would've kept them today. Can you imagine a "2022 Case IH Magnum 2+2 340".

  • @glenirwin1110
    @glenirwin1110 3 роки тому +5

    Somebody someday might bring this design back. Great visibility to the back and equal weight over both axles. Too bad Case IH dropped them. Once perfected it could have been quite a thing.

  • @drunkfucker81
    @drunkfucker81 11 років тому

    I remember watchinthis video at our local ih dealer when dad was lookin at one well we got one it has served us well at half of the fuel of our 4430 jd we still have both

  • @Systorable
    @Systorable 9 років тому +4

    One of the best tractors ever. IH listened to the farmers on this one. But then IH workers got hypnotized by the UAW and went on strike in the late 70s. The IH strike hurt IH a lot. It probably didn't keep them from going under, but it definitely sped it up.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  9 років тому +1

      Systorable 4 sare. :) strike hurts everything. but 2 bad it happened 2 ih

    • @harrimanfox8961
      @harrimanfox8961 2 роки тому +2

      they striked because IH made way too many budget cuts in the late 70s to boost profits, which included dropping many product lines and severely cutting pay of employees.

  • @AdamPlayFarms
    @AdamPlayFarms 3 роки тому

    Ran one of these on a feed wagon. Monuvered great around the lot. I loved the tractor hated the doors.

  • @michaelhalsall5684
    @michaelhalsall5684 10 років тому +14

    Great piece of IH history, even if the audio track is a bit cheesy.
    Thanks for finding this film and putting it here.
    The 2+2 tractors are true row crop tractors and are amazingly nimble for their size.
    Previous to this 4WD tractors were mainly used for broadacre grain farming.
    Regards from Michael, an Australian IH tractor enthusiast.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  10 років тому

      they r good tractors. :) ya sorry about the audio.:( ur welcome & thanks 4 watching. :)

    • @interman7715
      @interman7715 5 років тому

      Michael Halsall We had 13 IHC tractors, some over 50 years old and they all earned their keep.

  • @brianhunt5635
    @brianhunt5635 8 місяців тому

    We had 1 of the 319 6788 2+2s growing up that had the pump turned up far enough it'd leave a smoke trail from one end of the field to the other pulling a 5 shank earthmaster. It was a fun tractor to run, but our 7140 Magnum was where I rode most of the time.

  • @PorscheRacer14
    @PorscheRacer14 3 роки тому +1

    We had a 6588 for decades. As a kid growing up it was the easiest "big" tractor to operate and learn on. Just point and go. We upgraded to a Steiger Cougar later on. The Steiger was more powerful and better, but the steering had a learning curve when seeding or harrowing as you needed to run past where you wanted to go.

  • @Bald_Cat2007
    @Bald_Cat2007 Рік тому +1

    Fun Fact: international had a fleet of 2 Great Lakes Freighters. Their names? The SS International and SS Harvester

  • @Oliver66FarmBoy
    @Oliver66FarmBoy 11 років тому +4

    They were a good tractor. The only down side was that front axel. Not nearly enough oscilation. Ive seen quite a few of them with broken axels, most of the time from running duals though. Thanks for putting this up.

  • @interman7715
    @interman7715 6 років тому +13

    Cool tractors, I wish the farming industry would have gone this way with tractors like this and the White and Caseih rowcrop special articulated tractors rather than these stupid looking fwa tractors they make these days .

  • @tacsauce4185
    @tacsauce4185 8 років тому +2

    Wow Amazing Video I hope to See more from you soon!! I Can Tell you put time into The Video! Keep up the Good Videos!

  • @ylwpyro9549
    @ylwpyro9549 10 років тому +3

    If there ever were a "gentle giant" in the world of tractors, this would be it.

  • @andymotl
    @andymotl 11 років тому

    Hey nothing wrong with the old stuff. It's what got the job done and that's all that matters.

  • @HobbyFarmerAdam
    @HobbyFarmerAdam 11 років тому

    the vid is awsome

  • @thethinblueline2444
    @thethinblueline2444 7 років тому +3

    I grew up using a 3388 and a 3788 nearly every day. I prefer using them over a conventional tractor for almost any use. You obviously can't just put your foot on one brake and spin around at the end of the field like the others, but it makes up for it in traction.

  • @mfriedrich2012
    @mfriedrich2012 11 років тому +1

    They looked cool too. Better than the versatiles.

  • @littlewazz
    @littlewazz 6 років тому +5

    this tractor seems to be in high demand now I guess the rest of world has finally caught up to what the engineers created

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  6 років тому

      thats what im thinking 2..

    • @mrnascar9129
      @mrnascar9129 3 роки тому

      What!!!?!?!

    • @GermanShepherd1983
      @GermanShepherd1983 3 роки тому +1

      Only as a collectors item. In reality, a FWA tractor is much more practical in todays world and a hell of a lot more reliable.

  • @andymotl
    @andymotl 11 років тому +2

    And you get International's infamous rear ends with final drives still from the OG Farmall Regular's that we've been known to pass on and on and on from one model to the rest.... it's what makes your IH an International.....

    • @joshcrd7925
      @joshcrd7925 7 років тому

      yeup, 15 years ago I worked on a farm that ran 3 3588s and 1 3788. We blew out rear ends on 2 of them. one of them was almost impossible to shift the range box even tho it had been to 3 different dealers for repair. Granted three of them had well over 10000 hours on them. All in all they were decent tractors, looked pretty dang good too. My biggest gripe with them is for being 4x4 articulated they would get stuck so easy and it seemed like as soon as you started spinning, you were buried up to the axle.

    • @travisjohnson8240
      @travisjohnson8240 5 років тому +1

      All of IH's shifters were messed up at that time. Not just the longnose.

  • @wilmamcdermott3065
    @wilmamcdermott3065 7 місяців тому

    I had a 3588 at one point while I was farming 150 hp turned up to 180 hp all 4 wheels were duals

  • @ylwpyro9549
    @ylwpyro9549 10 років тому +1

    Also, I drew an articulated tractor once, so perhaps I should have taken a cue from the 2+2 when designing it.

  • @levipoling6803
    @levipoling6803 6 років тому +1

    CaseIH should bring back the 88 series (2+2's) they would probably be a great seller.

  • @tannertuner
    @tannertuner 3 роки тому +2

    I know I’ve heard farmers who used these really talk highly of them. But I remember when they first started showing up at the dealership, I thought that long anteater looking snout was the ugliest thing I’d ever seen and it looked like you’d have to take them to the airport to turn them around at the end of the row.
    I still think the 66 and 86 series were the best looking tractors any manufacturer ever built. I guess I’m partial because that’s what we farmed with.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  3 роки тому +2

      the 2+2's r nice but i like the 86 series more & i have 1.. :)

    • @tannertuner
      @tannertuner 3 роки тому

      @@MrJohndeere3720 wish I still did - and a place to use it. Maybe again one day

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  3 роки тому

      @@tannertuner what did u have ??

    • @tannertuner
      @tannertuner 3 роки тому +2

      @@MrJohndeere3720 we got a 1586 new in 77 I think it was. It was the first big tractor for my grandfather’s farm. Up until then my grandfather had done everything with a 504. My dad and his brother in law rented hundreds of additional acres and planted soybeans and corn and 33 acres of tobacco, which at the time was a lot of human labor. Dad had a full time job and was actually commuting 70 miles to farm on the weekends and off days.
      They apparently had a hard time getting used to the hydraulic brakes on the 86 and busted the bull gear a couple of times. The second time was in planting season and it took a long time for the shop to get it fixed and it put us behind planting that year. So my dad found a 1566 open station at auction sometime not long after that to make sure we weren’t without a tractor again.
      The price he paid for the 1566 made a lot more sense than the new price on the new 86. That quiet cab with a/c and a fantastic stereo system were nice and I loved it. But they really should have bought a used tractor to start out with. He even could have bought a 1566 with a cab at an auction before the 86 went down but didn’t.
      We had a chance to buy a 986 from my dad’s uncle who was being foreclosed on and we kept it a while. I used it a bit while we had it. I actually wish we had bought that one because we started a hay business in the late 80s when I was in college. We used the 1566 for that but it was really too much tractor for a round baler. And it wasn’t so big I couldn’t have cultivated with it. I liked them all but the 986 really made a lot more sense in retrospect.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  3 роки тому

      @@tannertuner o ok nice. :) i have a 1586 as well.. its 2 replace our farmall 400.. been slowly fixing it up.. mine is over kill 4 our farm but thats ok.. mines a 78 model.

  • @wizkidgamer9942
    @wizkidgamer9942 10 років тому +1

    I saw a 2+2 with the front axel broken off
    and then towed to get it fixed

  • @andymotl
    @andymotl 11 років тому +1

    What's wrong with your B? Is it the culti-vision model B? (Think that's what some were called?)

  • @farmall51
    @farmall51 11 років тому

    Could I get a copy of this .

  • @mrcraigz88
    @mrcraigz88 10 років тому +1

    How cool would it be if Case IH would have made the new Rowtrac with the cab on the rear half of the tractor.

  • @AmosMosesJr
    @AmosMosesJr 6 років тому +1

    "I don't get the drift," lol. Actually I have one but they were not very ergonomic. I ripped my pants on two occasions simply getting out of the cab. Although minor, it had some inherent mechanical issues too.

  • @501FARMALL
    @501FARMALL 11 років тому

    hey mr johndeere3720 could u tell me the guys name? id also like a copy

  • @43mackmobile
    @43mackmobile 2 роки тому

    Without rear duals and weight using the 3 point pulling a heavy load it would tend to dog track, such a pulling the old hippers when bedding for cotton on hill sides, I know I ran a new 3588 on a cotton farm but you could'nt beat it pulling a 30' disk or 3 shank sub moisture plow.

  • @reeseperry8171
    @reeseperry8171 3 роки тому +1

    I wish Case IH would come out with a new version of these today.

  • @lennygerber5631
    @lennygerber5631 5 років тому +1

    Put dual on it they said it'll be fun they said El Krakow

  • @ScottaHemi440
    @ScottaHemi440 10 років тому

    my dad has a 3388. takes a while to get used to driving it what with the whole nose turning on you!

  • @jbobrik1216
    @jbobrik1216 5 років тому +1

    What is a used 3588 2x3 with 2400hrs worth, decent shape but probably needs tires & batteries.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  5 років тому

      i go off of tractorhouse .com & they show 9k to 20k. so i would start at 13k only becuz of low hrs.

    • @jbobrik1216
      @jbobrik1216 5 років тому

      MRJOHNDEERE3720 shit and I heard that tires can be 900+ each!? That’s another 7200, he also has a 22ft PUL Flail mower as well in decent shape

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  5 років тому +1

      if u plan on putting new tires on it, then add that $7200 2 the price of the tractor.. im not sure what the mower would go 4, i would need the make & model number of it. i paid $8900 for my 1586 but then i had 3K of work done 2 it + another $300 of work done 2 it that i did myself, so now my tractor could go for 12,200. but im not done yet..lol if u think 13K is 2 low u can go up, go up 2 what u think is a far price. the 9K to 20K i gave u is the price range i've seen most go 4.. ya big tractor tires are $900+. we have a ih 400 gas & when the back tire blew out we had a 1k bill. my tractor tires are 10x bigger then whats on the 400, so if i had a blow out, im looking at a 2K+ bill . & thats only for 1 tire..

  • @andymotl
    @andymotl 11 років тому

    Where did you find this old film at anyways?

  • @MrLuckytrucker21
    @MrLuckytrucker21 7 років тому +5

    Not trashing the 2+2 anteater, but this tractor should have never been designed. It used up valuable time and money that ihc did not have, they needed to get the fifty series developed to help save the company and compete with deere!

    • @robertallen485
      @robertallen485 7 років тому +1

      mgtowfish73 I was constantly having to steer. We just plowed wheat ground. l can't imagine row cropping.

    • @MrLuckytrucker21
      @MrLuckytrucker21 7 років тому +2

      i have heard that from other farmers as well!

    • @interman7715
      @interman7715 5 років тому +1

      mgtowfish73 I agree the 50 series should have come out much earlier ,the drive trains were far superior to the 86 series.

    • @nellsonstout7001
      @nellsonstout7001 5 років тому +1

      interman 77 what wasn’t superior about the 5088 series?

  • @scottallred3941
    @scottallred3941 6 років тому

    few things I didn't like about the 2+2, steering was too sensitive ride was rough and sometimes the hood would release and slide forward if you hit ruts hard enough

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  6 років тому

      ya that's never good. 2 bad there was some updated parts 2 fix that. thanks 4 watching :)

    • @travisjohnson8240
      @travisjohnson8240 5 років тому

      We installed little rubber ball clamps

  • @thomasforst7327
    @thomasforst7327 Рік тому

    The best 2 2 is the. 3788

  • @eatingamandarin
    @eatingamandarin 4 роки тому

    Case IH should reintroduce this tractor with rubber tracks.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  4 роки тому

      ya they should, just as long as it does not have all that emissions BS on it , like all the newer tractors have..

    • @eatingamandarin
      @eatingamandarin 4 роки тому

      MRJOHNDEERE3720
      Wonder if anyone has put a Soucy Track system on a 2+2 anteater...

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  4 роки тому

      @@eatingamandarin dont no..

  • @tombig4011
    @tombig4011 4 роки тому +2

    Better run that TA in high or it will grenade.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  4 роки тому +4

      they grenade no matter what....lol

    • @tombig4011
      @tombig4011 4 роки тому

      @@MrJohndeere3720 my grandfather owned an IH dealership and I don't know how many we welded up to disable them.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  4 роки тому +1

      @@tombig4011 o very cool. i wish IH was still there own business.. tell ur grandfather hes a badass guy. :) i know a guy who had his TA removed in his 1086.

  • @GermanShepherd1983
    @GermanShepherd1983 3 роки тому +1

    The problem with the 2 + 2 was the nose was way too long. IH should have put the fuel tank somewhere else, that would have shortened it up considerably. The other problem it had was IH should have made it clear this was not the same as a large from four wheel drive. Guys put duals on and pulled the hell out of them and trany's couldn't take it. The problem with the 88 series two wheel drives was that stupid reverse flow fan. Dumb idea and it didn't work.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  3 роки тому

      they should have left the tanks under & behind the cab that would have shorten them up alot.. the reverse flow fan most likely did not have the power 2 work in extreme conditions..

    • @GermanShepherd1983
      @GermanShepherd1983 3 роки тому

      @@MrJohndeere3720 Actually, behind the cab was a dumb idea too. The 86's had that, and you couldn't see the drawbar to hook up an implement, unless you used the mirror IH installed. Better place for the fuel tank would be under the steps, like all tractors have today.

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  3 роки тому

      @@GermanShepherd1983 well i dont mind the tank behind the cab. u can still see the drawbar but ur face would be in the window...lol but ya the best place is under the steps. most have the fill neck at eye level. where as the 86's had it over ur head..

  • @mikedemott1720
    @mikedemott1720 2 роки тому

    Ford had the idea first. County Super 6

    • @Sjanzo
      @Sjanzo 6 місяців тому

      It wasnt Fords idea. And the Matbro Mastiff was closer to the anteater.

  • @formerfarmer1718
    @formerfarmer1718 2 роки тому +1

    IH just waited too long before updating their tractor technology. By the time they hit the market with their new very innovative tractors we were in our depression. Nobody was buying much let alone updating machinery. Auctioneers were busy selling out upside down farmers. Hollywood was making movies based on our miseries. Actresses who had only made a movie about farming were testifying before Congress in our behalf. Willie Nelson came up with Farm Aid. We were just hanging on coming off double digit inflation and doubling interest rates on borrowed money (thank you Jimmy Carter). And then JI Case came along and didn’t see the advantage that had been laid in their lap. They immediately stopped the production of IH tractors and only saw it as an opportunity to repaint and sell their backlog of Cases. The 80s! Sooo many missed opportunities……..

    • @lukestrawwalker
      @lukestrawwalker 2 роки тому

      Yep d@mn Carter and his Soviet grain embargo, among his many other failures, which precipitated if not outright caused the 80's farm crisis... Well, that and the continuation of failed fiscal and ag policies, and stagflation coupled with super high interest rates and the Arab oil embargoes. I still remember as a kid sitting in line for gas... odd numbered plates could get gas one day, even number plates the next...
      Now we're getting ready to do it all again. Probly just quit this time around; don't feel like trying to muddle through for ten+ years waiting for things to get better...
      Later! OL J R :)

    • @formerfarmer1718
      @formerfarmer1718 2 роки тому +1

      @@lukestrawwalker And…..this Democrat is not only doubling down on Carter’s “misery index”, they’re shooting for the moon‼️ Looking like lots of people will be setting their thermostats back to 68 again and wearing sweaters…..just like in Jimmy’s little “fireside chat”‼️

    • @lukestrawwalker
      @lukestrawwalker 2 роки тому

      Before it's over we may be lucky to have beans and tortillas... I've never seen such total incompetence... OL J R

    • @formerfarmer1718
      @formerfarmer1718 2 роки тому +1

      @@lukestrawwalker I wish it was only incompetence! It’s much more netherious

    • @lukestrawwalker
      @lukestrawwalker 2 роки тому

      @@formerfarmer1718 yeah I think so too... There are no coincidences

  • @landendunkel4653
    @landendunkel4653 3 роки тому

    They don't make them like they used to

  • @MrDmatt128
    @MrDmatt128 11 років тому +1

    Snoopy

  • @demiller74
    @demiller74 8 місяців тому

    I know guys love the 2+2, but I look at them as a waste of a good 1486 and a half.

  • @leslieholman3121
    @leslieholman3121 4 роки тому

    Ahh the old Snoopy’s so ugly that they were cool looking tractors. They were a very unique design. Not like the ugly garbage tractors of today

  • @ArmpitStudios
    @ArmpitStudios 3 роки тому

    Oh god, pointing a camera at a TV screen to “transfer” it to digital? Unwatchable.

  • @SubvenioArguo
    @SubvenioArguo 8 років тому +1

    This video made me want to puke. Lol.

  • @davedocker1195
    @davedocker1195 4 роки тому

    Horrible sound

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  2 роки тому

      u dont like it but yet ur subscribed 2 my channel??

  • @bencramer5458
    @bencramer5458 4 роки тому +1

    Ugliest tractor EVER 😂

    • @MrJohndeere3720
      @MrJohndeere3720  4 роки тому

      ur just talkin crazy....lol

    • @gonecountry246
      @gonecountry246 11 місяців тому

      Thank you lol because me and my brother have always said this so I read all the comments to see how many other people said this lol. Our farmer neighbor had one for years and we were very impressed with how ugly it was 😂

  • @logankrenke9850
    @logankrenke9850 11 років тому

    One of ugliest tractors in the world. I could shit in a box and call it a 2 plus 2.