Cinema 4D and Redshift - Create Procedural Radial Anisotropy

[@SofiaOsc]

Thank you sooo much, you have no idea how long I've been trying to get this to work!! 🤩

[@BoldBreak]

It took me awhile to figure this out :) Thanks for commenting

[@saltacme]

It was really helpfull - thank you for that tutorial :)

[@BoldBreak]

Thank you for watching and the feedback. Delighted it was helpful

[@wanlyou]

Thank you, you have inspired me a lot

[@BoldBreak]

Delighted it helped

[@fernandoroquecatalano1624]

so cool!

[@BoldBreak]

Thanks for dropping by

[@TobiasSchoenke]

Thx very helpful

[@BoldBreak]

Delighted that it helped

[@Ricardo-de9ju]

Why are you using the old material instead of standard one? Any advantages?

[@erikmder11]

New material doesn't allow for GGX under BRDF

[@BoldBreak]

The RS material offers a bit more control. We can change our BRDF and also change our Fresnel type. You will get a similar result using the new material but less control.

[@Ricardo-de9ju]

@@BoldBreak I think the standard one is faster, I've heard about that somewhere. Once PBR materials are "physically correct" I don't believe it will offer inferior results.

[@BoldBreak]

@@Ricardo-de9ju Yes, Standard materials are slightly faster due to having less properties to calculate.
Usually I’ll opt for a standard material. But on occasion I’ll use the older material node for finite control.