Contracts - Exam Crash Course Part 1/7
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 жов 2024
- This is PART 1 of a crash course to prepare for a law school final exam in contracts.
Topics in this part:
The definition of a contract (legally enforceable agreement)
Basic terms and buzzwords for your exam response
Discussion of the relation between contracts and economics
honesstly you helped me get an A on contracts in 1L year and I'm right back here prepping for the bar glad these videos are still online. thank you :')
So happy to hear that, thanks for sharing. I hope the bar exam went well for you!!
I've got no prior experience with law, or contracts in any professional capacity. I'm not even in college for law. Yet, I found this incredibly informative and easy to understand. Fantastic.
Very useful videos so far!!! I just got accepted into law school and studying ahead of time to be as ready as possible.
+Nick Hernandez our names are similar - i'm on my first year of law, really enjoying it. good luck
I just started a law program, and I think this tutorial is gonna up my grades. It's so simplified. Thanks.
This is very informative, especially to a novice who is not in law school. This is the beginning of me working toward my degree in Environmental Law. Thanks
Thanks for note, and good luck on your journey!!
Thank you for your 7 contract videos. They have helped me have a better understanding of Contract Law.
Exceptional course thanks for the Legal Coach who share such valuable training, God bless that educational sacrifice you were made
Aww shucks, thanks!!
ABSOLUTELY EXCELLENT!!! Why this video is very, very well done: The ABSENCE of any (NOISY) music - thank goodness, no jingles, esp. the sudden noisy blast at the very beginning of some so-called lecture videos on UA-cam...that can cause "sudden deafness" to the unsuspecting viewer/listener, who often is wearing headphones.... Furthermore, of course, the lecture itself is so very clearly explained, as if the explications were for the consumption of young schoolchildren. Every single item is very clearly explained and then later further elaborated so there's no room for any confusion or miscomprehension....
Greg K.
Promissory estoppel is a legal principle that a promise is enforceable by law, even if made without formal consideration, when a promisor has made a promise to a promisee who then relies on that promise to his subsequent detriment.
i wish they were still teaching this stuff. This has helped me a lot. Contracts for whatever reason have been a challenge for me.
Nice sharing
Hey thanks for this video. I'm looking forward to the others too. I do have a question re ex post / ex ante. Just based on the Latin, it seemed to me that ex ante (antecedent) should be the prior position, and ex post the latter. Your tutorial says people make contracts ex post, before they have extra knowledge, and ex ante is when the contract comes to pass and they see the actual returns. I looked up the terms ex post / ex ante, and the contract definitions seem to be the reverse of what you say here. Was that a mix up? Can you comment? I'm a 1L, so I'm not being a know-it-all, just being cautious before I commit to something on an exam.
Mica Lee Williams .thanks
If you look at the ruling in Peevyhouse it seems like the courts treat contracts akin to agreements rather than promises. Otherwise you couldn’t justify ruling in regards to economic efficiency over specific performance
Never admit to being the NAME in court, ever.
If it isn't a criminal charge, don't worry.
As soon as the judge has finished speaking "are you NAME", don't answer to the NAME, instead take over by asking Your Honor if you can question Mr Prosecutor then proceed to question Mr Prosecutor. If the judge tries to butt in say "with all due respect Your Honor I am going to finish my question to Mr Prosecutor".
Mr Prosecutor, are you acting as an agent of the Crown? Yes.
Mr Prosecutor, are you acting as the trustee of the Crown today? Yes.
Your honor, there is the trustee "points to Mr Prosecutor", he has his cheque book with him, make him pay.
If the judge asks you any question do not answer no matter how much intimidation they try upon you. 3 strikes and they're out. When they've walked out tell everyone "I am taking jurisdiction of the court, move for a motion to dismiss."
Then ask "when do I sign to get the discharge?".
Silly fictional court.
Very helpful. But ex-post is after an event happened, and ex-ante is before it did. Opposite to what you say.
Thank you so much. You're a life saver!!
Just FYI I tried to click on this video in my feed, it wouldn't do anything but make a click noise, I could click on other videos above and below this one... I had to visit your videos and page to view this
Really weird, thanks for letting me know. You like the video?
Thanku sir from India ❤️
Amazing video! Love your examples and straight forward nature!
Great video. I have a question, a bit unrelated on the surface, but I believe it is very relevant. Who codifies the Public Law? I cannot find this answer anywhere in the written form, and have only been able to get an answer verbally from 2 different sources. Both gave the same answer. Also, you mention Quasi-Contracts; aren't most of the courts operating today called Quasi-Courts? That is what I have found. All administrative and not judicial in nature.
Ex ante is before the event, Ex post is after the event!
Thank you.
Listening to this at 2X speed is like having Ben Shapiro teach you contract law
What about 3X speed?
But if a contract is not binding you can not enforce it in court, binding is necessary and sufficient requirement to enforce the contract.
Great legal refresher course Thank You
.:..
A Warranty is an Option (not stocks) for a possible Contract of Service at a future date, not agreed yet.
thank you: you are a good instructor.
nia
It is very helpful.
Hi, I tried to contact you via your website but could not even open the website...? Would you have some other details to contact you? thanks a lot!
-^^__
How can I get in touch with you about tutoring?
.:…
Sorry, but I no longer offer tutoring services.
very useful
could you give me your email or are you on whatsApp? let me know...
or if you have skype, would be great as well.
Could you share the document you are using?
Don’t have them anymore, but if I post new videos, I’ll make them available.
@@thelegalcoach6461 also wondering the same for these videos! Finding them super helpful
rock on baby! thank you
Thank you!
Are these contracts crash course videos appropriate for MBE preparation?
I think you'll find them very useful for the MBE.
Thanks!
Great videos if you speed it up a little bit! He just talks really slow
go to settings speed and switch it to 1.25 or 1.5. saved my life
For assignment helps: www.fiverr.com/karan1x1kvs/do-law-and-management-assignments
Don't forget to read the reviews :)
great video.
Hey man i believe your videos would be so much better if you improved your audio.
you can contact me if you want my suggestion as to how you can improve it.
Sounds like child support thiefs tittle 4 A social sec act collects money for title 4D but title 4A says voluntary enroll on the program they never tell you this thats a inconsolable contract BINGO!!!
Anderson Timothy Walker Lisa Walker Maria
Contracts amzn.to/2tySouV
make your answers shorter. it's almost you rambling to yourself
IF YOU'RE ACTUALLY A LAWYER, PLEASE LIST YOUR NAME & CREDENTIALS
airsoft326 Harvey Birdman
Seems likely the man knows his stuff.