The best explanation of the statute of frauds and exceptions. Thank you. If I can add one very minor bit of feedback on your examples using the names Bob, Barb, Bo...confusing, sound too much alike, especially when listening to audio only in the car. How about Barb as the buyer, Sam as the seller, for example, less confusing.
I’m confused. At the 38:00 mark you’re talking about Sale of Goods and whether the writing is sufficient against the sender. Bob is the sender (of chocolates, right?). You said “if Barb was the defendant her writing confirming the transaction would be sufficient.” But she’s not the defendant, she’s the plaintiff in your example. Bob never signed. So how will Barb prevail?
Wow, thanks. I'm in the middle of a fraudulent inheritance buyout Contract against the trustee who made numerous strikes for a valid Contract. The trustee also says the other beneficiaries agreed and their names are not on the contract to agree. The contract has a notary public who states she was present during the signing and that insigned her journal with is false, there was just me amd some stranger. Nowhere nor was I ever told I had rights to rescind or allow changes. My brothers and I where not aware of these damages until 9.5 ueqrs later after becoming g aware the trustee is now wanting to sell the house and is making a buyout attempt to the other beneficiaries without any documentation. We have a court hearing today, Nov 15th at probate court. The trustee has also been stealing rental income and not distributed to beneficiaries.
best video on statute of frauds hands down. Thanks!
Excellent discussion.
Great breakdown the teaching is A1
The best explanation of the statute of frauds and exceptions. Thank you.
If I can add one very minor bit of feedback on your examples using the names Bob, Barb, Bo...confusing, sound too much alike, especially when listening to audio only in the car. How about Barb as the buyer, Sam as the seller, for example, less confusing.
excellent
I’m confused. At the 38:00 mark you’re talking about Sale of Goods and whether the writing is sufficient against the sender. Bob is the sender (of chocolates, right?). You said “if Barb was the defendant her writing confirming the transaction would be sufficient.” But she’s not the defendant, she’s the plaintiff in your example. Bob never signed. So how will Barb prevail?
Ok, disregard. I think I get it. It’s a merchant’s confirmatory memo and that’s why it’s sufficient. And now I really want some chocolates. 😁
Wow, thanks. I'm in the middle of a fraudulent inheritance buyout Contract against the trustee who made numerous strikes for a valid Contract. The trustee also says the other beneficiaries agreed and their names are not on the contract to agree. The contract has a notary public who states she was present during the signing and that insigned her journal with is false, there was just me amd some stranger. Nowhere nor was I ever told I had rights to rescind or allow changes. My brothers and I where not aware of these damages until 9.5 ueqrs later after becoming g aware the trustee is now wanting to sell the house and is making a buyout attempt to the other beneficiaries without any documentation. We have a court hearing today, Nov 15th at probate court. The trustee has also been stealing rental income and not distributed to beneficiaries.
i aint readin all dat