Beccaria On Crimes And Punishments Crash Course

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @bethany1485
    @bethany1485 3 роки тому +22

    This video was made years ago but has managed to help me understand this theory with ease until this day. Thank you!

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  3 роки тому +3

      Glad to hear Bethany

    • @garimakharra1784
      @garimakharra1784 2 роки тому

      Am not getting difference between "free will" as criminal do crime with his choice then how it is different from state of mind ...as free will is also his choice to do crime his intention in implied in that can u plz explain me...am not getting it

    • @JohnGeometresMaximos
      @JohnGeometresMaximos 3 місяці тому

      @@CriminologyWeb
      Just ordered "On Crimes and Punishments, and Other Writings" by Cambridge.
      How does Beccaria compare to Bentham and Hobbes?

  • @jahcentercarnegie7597
    @jahcentercarnegie7597 5 років тому +37

    This was right on time with my essay

  • @daryared2808
    @daryared2808 4 роки тому +7

    This really helped me for my current Artefact for my Uni.

  • @saekrrow
    @saekrrow 5 років тому +7

    Most effective and helpful video on Beccaria!

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  5 років тому

      Thanks! I really appreciate your comment :)

  • @bretthudson4532
    @bretthudson4532 5 років тому +9

    Thank you for the explanation it actually made more sense than what my teacher was sharing.

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  5 років тому

      Thanks so much, Brett! Really happy it was helpful.

  • @christinepitinyane
    @christinepitinyane 4 роки тому +5

    Thank you for the video. This was truly informative and helpful

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому

      Thanks for your comment, Christine, I'm happy to hear that.

  • @artieslife3367
    @artieslife3367 4 роки тому +9

    Thank you so much! I finally understand with your simple explanation.

  • @pietro9845
    @pietro9845 3 роки тому +4

    Good video, very informative and well explained.
    Greetings from Milan!

  • @Lilykwankl
    @Lilykwankl 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for explanation!

  • @chandanpandey107
    @chandanpandey107 4 роки тому +4

    Ma'am I am from India and I am law student . Your videos are very helpful to us so please can you make some other topics of criminology videos

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому +1

      Hi Chandan, glad they're helpful. But not sure what you mean?

    • @Phoenix-ly5yz
      @Phoenix-ly5yz 3 роки тому +1

      @@CriminologyWeb He's asking for more videos on different aspects of criminology

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, it was edited. More videos coming up!

  • @SakyaSudhakar
    @SakyaSudhakar 3 роки тому +1

    Good relevant information to modern theoretical analysis

  • @michaelreyes793
    @michaelreyes793 4 роки тому +3

    Muchas gracias, tu canal es muy interesante...

  • @emmanuelrubio5168
    @emmanuelrubio5168 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks on this. Very informative topic on this field

  • @JK-ji3kl
    @JK-ji3kl 6 місяців тому

    Those are some very important ideas behind criminal law. I knew the ideas but not Beccaria's name. Thank goodness we live in a time where those ideas are mundane and unremarkable and uncontroversial (except perhaps the death penalty in some parts of the world).

  • @Luxury_vagabond
    @Luxury_vagabond Рік тому +1

    很棒的內容

  • @MN_LAW_CLASSES
    @MN_LAW_CLASSES 10 місяців тому

    Thank you very much Mam

  • @giauyngo4750
    @giauyngo4750 3 роки тому +1

    helped me with my history class :)

  • @wesley-wn8tv
    @wesley-wn8tv 6 місяців тому

    very well done.

  • @camerapersonsagar5682
    @camerapersonsagar5682 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks....

  • @itaroken
    @itaroken 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you, very helpful. However, the quote given at the end of the video is not in the link you have given in the description. Is the quote from a different version of the essay? Thank you

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  3 роки тому +1

      Correct, the original document that I referred to is unfortunately no longer available, and translations differ a little. However, contentwise it's the same.

  • @yamiskidzzone3859
    @yamiskidzzone3859 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks ma'am , found you on Udemy ..searched and found you here too

  • @mazex4151
    @mazex4151 7 місяців тому

    Hi, CriminologyWeb! The PDF might not exist anymore, may I ask for a copy? Thanks!

  • @garimakharra1784
    @garimakharra1784 2 роки тому +1

    Am not getting difference between "free will" as criminal do crime with his choice then how it is different from state of mind ...as free will is also his choice to do crime his intention in implied in that can anyone plz explain me...am not getting it

    • @mazex4151
      @mazex4151 7 місяців тому

      You do have "free will" that should be good and without hurting others and damaging things. Otherwise you get consequences.

  • @manojdhanushka7467
    @manojdhanushka7467 8 місяців тому

    Good explaination

  • @martymcfly8200
    @martymcfly8200 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @jot6729
    @jot6729 4 роки тому +1

    thanks

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому +1

      You're very welcome, desert rose. Merry Christmas.

  • @stateworker
    @stateworker Рік тому

    Excellent prensentation. Thank you. Can the poster or anyone else explain how proportionality to the harm caused and fidelity to laws passed by legislators can co-exist? If two people each fire a gun at another person and one hits the spine and the other nicks the ear, surely the legislatures can't account for each and every scenario, so it would still be up to the magistrate/judge to determine the punishment, no? The legislature most likely would pass a law against attempted murder with a sentence for the crime being ten years. But each shooter getting the same sentence would not be proportional where one victim is paralyzed for life and the other was treated and released the day of the shooting barely worse for wear. Again, thanks for the primer-very interesting.

    • @llibressal
      @llibressal Рік тому

      Those societies that adopted these enlightened ideas certainly had to consider scenarios like yours. In the United States our founders concluded that in your scenario what was important was the mens reah, or the state of mind of the perpetrator. In your example the state of mind of either of your two shooters could have been to kill in in order to eliminate or on the other hand either shooter could have meant to merely protect one's self from death or great bodily injury. The motive, as it should, makes a big difference although not the only factor hence our different penalties for "attempted murder" vs "murder in the 1st degree", etc.

  • @renategaidele2457
    @renategaidele2457 3 роки тому +1

    Hello. I'd like to cite this, but there is no name of author of this video :(

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  3 роки тому

      Hi Renate, it's fine if you just say CriminologyWeb as the author

  • @discoveryvlog4577
    @discoveryvlog4577 4 роки тому +1

    Good

  • @johnmiguelaldave7871
    @johnmiguelaldave7871 4 роки тому +1

    thanks for this video :) 🔔

  • @noumanmajeed6266
    @noumanmajeed6266 4 роки тому

    You have not talked about the causes of crimes he gave i.e rational causes , that is very important for classical theories of criminology

    • @noumanmajeed6266
      @noumanmajeed6266 4 роки тому

      Although explanation was to the point and very effective.

  • @kentaki04
    @kentaki04 4 роки тому +1

    nice

  • @Mr_Twisted_T
    @Mr_Twisted_T 4 роки тому

    I am wandering if anyone here can go into a little more detail for what beccaria meant with the 'educstion is the best deterrent' thing

    • @farfar8773
      @farfar8773 3 роки тому

      Im not really sure but i think its something related with people who came from lower class or basically just poor and uneducated people

  • @janezzuzek1676
    @janezzuzek1676 3 роки тому +1

    Hey can you perhaps list your source / full essay it seems like the page listed doesnt exist. thank you so much in advance

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for letting me know! Here's an alternative: www.criminologytoday.com/beccaria.pdf

  • @gracemaryeliesa2188
    @gracemaryeliesa2188 2 роки тому

    Where are you getting your information from?

    • @garimakharra1784
      @garimakharra1784 2 роки тому

      Am not getting difference between "free will" as criminal do crime with his choice then how it is different from state of mind ...as free will is also his choice to do crime his intention in implied in that can u plz explain me...am not getting it

  • @abdullahayatrollah2416
    @abdullahayatrollah2416 3 роки тому +1

    Punishment is not really equal today is it?

    • @garimakharra1784
      @garimakharra1784 2 роки тому

      Am not getting difference between "free will" as criminal do crime with his choice then how it is different from state of mind ...as free will is also his choice to do crime his intention in implied in that can u plz explain me...am not getting it

  • @mtro.ramonibencarlojessuru7411
    @mtro.ramonibencarlojessuru7411 4 роки тому +1

    Uitstekend!

  • @FahadFSA
    @FahadFSA 3 роки тому +1

    👌👌👌👌👌👌👏👏👏

  • @sovitkarmacharya8741
    @sovitkarmacharya8741 3 роки тому +1

    So 17 to 25 years of life imprisonment is better than death penalty ? In my view, people fear death more than being locked in a room for limited amount of time. I am so confused. 😭

    • @massimobernardo-
      @massimobernardo- 3 роки тому +2

      in 1700 no chance of living 20 years in prison, maybe 10.

    • @farfar8773
      @farfar8773 3 роки тому +3

      I think you missed the point. Basically what Beccaria said was the certainty of punisment is more important than the severity of the punishment

  • @fedevice
    @fedevice 4 роки тому +1

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAA SONO STANCO. Nice video though!

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому

      Ha, not tired of the video I hope.

    • @fedevice
      @fedevice 4 роки тому +1

      @@CriminologyWeb What? Nono, the video is really accurate! It has even more details than I could ever ask for packed in six minutes! Sorry for yesterday, studying sometimes is able to blackout my reasoning...

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому

      LOL; studying can do that :) Hope things are okay in Italy at the moment.

    • @fedevice
      @fedevice 4 роки тому

      @@CriminologyWeb Hahah, yeah, losing my head just sitting in my home 24/7, it ain't that difficult, just pretty unusual... Thanks for asking though!

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому +1

      @@fedevice No kidding, unusual to say the least!

  • @michellealonzo4570
    @michellealonzo4570 4 роки тому +1

    so what comes first crime or law?🤣

    • @CriminologyWeb
      @CriminologyWeb  4 роки тому

      I vote for crime

    • @farfar8773
      @farfar8773 3 роки тому

      Depends on the definition lmao. If its the legal definition of crime then law comes first. In other definitions mostly crime comes first

    • @mazex4151
      @mazex4151 7 місяців тому

      Law comes first. Law is the only one that defines the crimes.

  • @capitalengineer1803
    @capitalengineer1803 3 роки тому

    hi Blonde