Jaguar F Type SVR vs Lamborghini Huracan - Race!!! | Four Marks Supercar Club

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @joshwalton1120
    @joshwalton1120 3 роки тому +181

    The jag did pretty well considering the power difference

    • @CapnT87
      @CapnT87 3 роки тому +26

      The Jag has 100+ lb-ft more torque and only 27hp or so less than the Huracan. With the Huracan’s lower weight and faster gearbox it’s a close one. Go 5.0 supercharged V8!

    • @v12-s65
      @v12-s65 3 роки тому +18

      @@CapnT87 torque doesn't matter here. it's all about power, weight and aerodynamics. the jag clearly has 35hp less than the huracan and still managed to do well even with a torque converter auto

    • @leroyjenkins6809
      @leroyjenkins6809 3 роки тому +9

      @@v12-s65 torque always matters because that’s what wins races.

    • @v12-s65
      @v12-s65 3 роки тому +12

      @@leroyjenkins6809 no no. If you want top speed, more horses. If you want fuel efficiency and good pulling power then you need torque. You know that rpm x torque equals to power? If you got low torque like in the huracan but high redline, you can get the same amount of power as a boosted engine with more torque but lower red line.

    • @leroyjenkins6809
      @leroyjenkins6809 3 роки тому +4

      @@v12-s65 yes you are correct, but if you want a high top speed, you also want the sufficient amount of torque to get you there and get you there quickly. High horse power with high torque will always be better than high horsepower with low torque. Kinda like a C6 Z06 with the 7.0L LS7 vs a Ferrari 458 or a Gallardo. The LS7 has a superior top end because of that big liter torque.

  • @inbguytkk2373
    @inbguytkk2373 3 роки тому +42

    AS A SAME COLOR SVR OWNER, I AM PROUD OF THIS CAR.

  • @DanielSadjadian
    @DanielSadjadian Рік тому +25

    Fair play to the F-Type SVR, it did pretty well 🔥

  • @ivanking569
    @ivanking569 2 роки тому +32

    It's a 200K plus Lambo, it's supposed to beat the lesser priced and under powered Jag. That said,...I love the F-Type.

    • @RyneLanders
      @RyneLanders Рік тому +1

      "underpowered" - it's 575hp from a super charged V8. It may have *less* power than the Lambo, but it's hardly underpowered.

    • @ivanking569
      @ivanking569 Рік тому

      Fair point. 'Stock' It has less power than the Lambo, but with modifications and tuning,..700+ bhp is obtainable.
      I have an XFR, which has the same 5.0 SC engine,.and it too is an incredible car.

    • @rns6889
      @rns6889 9 місяців тому

      ​@@RyneLandersit's not underpowered for sure but this jag is heavy for some reason, they weigh like 1.7 to 1.8 tons I think. Whole the lambo having a v10 still weighs 1.5 tons. Honestly jag porbably just cheaper out on the engine and didn't put any boost on it. Considering a gt500 makes 200 more hp with a simillar sized engine. If I had one is want it to make the engine simillar to the "predator" engine. It is co developed with ford anyways.

  • @karanmeena1536
    @karanmeena1536 3 роки тому +22

    Jaguar is best

  • @halow4
    @halow4 Рік тому +10

    Give the jag a tune and its pulling the huracan

  • @vinto34
    @vinto34 3 роки тому +18

    The jag was holding on well there for a bit.

  • @lhracinglegende3845
    @lhracinglegende3845 3 роки тому +13

    Svr top exhaust

  • @vintageyu-hi-oh4271
    @vintageyu-hi-oh4271 Рік тому +3

    Would take the jag any day. Way more character ❤

  • @al3med756
    @al3med756 Рік тому +4

    I've tried a lot of sports cars and I couldn't find better acceleration than the Jaguar❤🐆

  • @invigor18
    @invigor18 3 роки тому +3

    Jamie vardy?

  • @johnlukach4091
    @johnlukach4091 2 роки тому +1

    What's this a 3 second race?

    • @MoneyShifted
      @MoneyShifted Рік тому

      They should have just kept going right?

  • @PeterSchneemann
    @PeterSchneemann 9 місяців тому

    I am not surprised that the Lamborghini won, but considering the price difference, they were too close

  • @dredadon6515
    @dredadon6515 3 роки тому +2

    Cut the weight jaguar

    • @johnlukach4091
      @johnlukach4091 2 роки тому

      They're assholes they make cookie cutter cars like the Krauts do I've had 3 Jags but they lost their panache this last XJ was the last nice car they've made the interior on the f type is a laugh

  • @cw2840
    @cw2840 3 роки тому +18

    I swear the only thing the f type svr lacks is speed. Why the hell didnt they put like 50 more horsepower in it. It gets walked by stock M5s which is a family sedan and this huracan was pulling hard on it. Disappointing.

    • @luclapierre7621
      @luclapierre7621 3 роки тому +10

      Easy fix. There are a few vendors that offer a lower pulley swap + ECU tune that brings the 5.0 output up to 645hp/630lb-ft. Not expensive.

    • @cw2840
      @cw2840 3 роки тому +9

      @@luclapierre7621 yeah ik you can mod it but I’m talking about the factory specs. It’s best advised not to mod jaguars they are already unreliable af stock so adding more power will just be a recipe for disaster. I wish the factory built the engine and trans a little stronger and added the 50 or so horsepower in to actually compete with its competitors in terms of straight line acceleration

    • @someguy1907
      @someguy1907 3 роки тому +12

      @@cw2840 jags aren’t unreliable anymore after 2016 2017 they fixed a lot of the issues

    • @xXGamerXx71
      @xXGamerXx71 3 роки тому +9

      @@cw2840
      Upgrade Intercooler radiator and charge cooler, slap on around 600hp -> as reliable as from factory
      dont go much higher tho, the heat will be a problem
      factory f-types are really reliable btw

    • @cw2840
      @cw2840 3 роки тому

      @@someguy1907 eh they still get a pretty poor rating they are unreliable

  • @jonathanngai5956
    @jonathanngai5956 3 роки тому +4

    silly race, i owned various sports cars and i really wanted to try jaguar but the only reason I have not so far is that it is so chunky and slow

    • @STRENGTH444
      @STRENGTH444 3 роки тому +36

      chunky, yes, slow? youve clearly not driven one

    • @FK-ky7ql
      @FK-ky7ql 3 роки тому +12

      Spoken like a true liar.

    • @mazakantc5532
      @mazakantc5532 3 роки тому +6

      Jags f types are GT's not comparable with ' race' cars with the likes of ferrari or lambos, one is comfortable immensely fast ride ride one is full on race mode.

    • @wattsenough
      @wattsenough 3 роки тому +1

      I think that differentiation between supercars, muscle cars and sports cars is necessary. Are we talking about a 750hp Mustang or a Lambo in comparison or an M5 with 600hp (underrated on purpose). The F Type is a great all round road car going from a local point to point. Much like a MG on steroids. It is cramped (6' barely fits), and rides very hard. For 30 minute commutes, it is a riot to drive. Over an hour it is a bit hard on the body and you feel worn out. The M5 is a great touring car. BMW has it dialed in perfectly. Even the sport setting is comfortable at speed. You can drive 6 hours easy and not feel beat up. Chunky is something I would not describe 570hp with a supercharger. The power comes on very quick and strong. Plus it is AWD.

    • @busterblond1
      @busterblond1 Рік тому +1

      A tuned XFR is faster and set the world record for saloon cars at the Utah salt flats in 2010 with a recorded speed of 225 miles per hr