They Are Banning Glocks and This is a Good Thing

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • The state of New York has introduced a bill to ban Glocks in the state. The reasoning: because of the Glock switch. Yes, because they can’t keep criminals from criminalling they are going to ban the most popular handgun, perhaps in the world. GOA. FPC, and SAF are going to wreck house on this one. They fallout from this will likely spawn the next generation of legal assets that our teams can use to defeat racist gun control efforts and further second amendment litigation and culture. The last time gun grabbers tried something this ill sighted we got the NYSRPA V Bruin.
    ALL LINKS, Join the Email List, and get discounts from the affiliates page: linktr.ee/vso_...
    Armed and Nerded Podcast:
    / @armedandnerded
    #vsogunchannel
    The VSO Gun Channel is an educational resource of VSO Media LLC, a media production company, and VSOrdnance LLC, a research and development/ Testing Evaluation "contract lab". VSO is not in the business of selling or promoting the sale of firearms. Nothing VSO publishes should be misconstrued to support the sale of Firearms, components, or accessories. The VSO Gun Channel serves as a common sense, educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety particularly for young minds otherwise negatively influenced by a fundamental breakdown of our society.
    Unless otherwise stated, the subject matter of this video was provided by the manufacturer or another third party at no cost to us. In doing so, VSO reserves all creative rights, including the right to publish negative aspects it deems relevant to the representation of the product and its continuous improvement. VSO Gun Channel only publishes objective content related directly to tests performed by its personnel. While in-depth test results may be shared directly with manufacturers prior to official release, they must agree NOT to: impede VSO's work, attempt to undermine or alter our results, impugn or undermine our integrity, and must forfeit any expectation of being involved in the process. To be clear to our viewers, VSOrdnance LLC provides testing, evaluation, research, and product development consulting services to clients, for which it is compensated. It is solely at VSO's discretion whether or not to turn footage over to VSO Gun Channel for the publishing video derived from such tests and experience with these products. These are separate-No party may buy our opinion & No party may buy access to our audience even if it is their ulterior motive to do so by contracting the testing.
    If you are interested in VSO's services you may submit an official inquiry via email to the contact email listed on channel the "about" page

КОМЕНТАРІ • 508

  • @ancient122
    @ancient122 5 місяців тому +390

    They should make murder illegal as well

    • @QdMaster
      @QdMaster 5 місяців тому +16

      Omg! That would fix everything! Lmfao! 🤣🤣🤣 Every liberal knows that criminals obey all the laws all the time! 😜

    • @DMurray-cn6hp
      @DMurray-cn6hp 5 місяців тому +9

      You mean like abortions? Asking for a friend😅

    • @Fordgroup00
      @Fordgroup00 5 місяців тому

      @@DMurray-cn6hp
      Grow up

    • @stevesinclair4159
      @stevesinclair4159 5 місяців тому

      The wont make murder illegal, the Democrat party relies on registering the dead as its new and most loyal postal voters

    • @randyhanson837
      @randyhanson837 5 місяців тому +3

      Shawntel: Hey Rufus, you wanna go do that hit on the crips tonight?
      Rufus: Naw, man, I'm still waiting for my CCW permit, can't go just yet.

  • @TheCoolwhipped
    @TheCoolwhipped 5 місяців тому +154

    NY: We're gonna ban Glocks. Do something about it.
    FPC: Ill be your Huckleberry

    • @ShibaFan99
      @ShibaFan99 5 місяців тому

      FPC, GOA, SAF… the NRA will be in shortly after the decision to take credit for it.

    • @wtcb7892
      @wtcb7892 5 місяців тому +3

      Huckle bearer - aka casket holder

    • @dson1978
      @dson1978 4 місяці тому +1

      They do nothing. 13 years and counting since the AWB.

    • @ShibaFan99
      @ShibaFan99 4 місяці тому

      @@dson1978 NY legislature and judges could ruin a wet dream. Gotta vote on the issues not on the party. Too many activist judges on the bench.

    • @allanfischer9417
      @allanfischer9417 4 місяці тому

      Be sure the stupid prize you are about to win is what you want.

  • @HeartsOfDarkness
    @HeartsOfDarkness 5 місяців тому +182

    If the AR is America’s rifle, Glock has got to be America’s pistol.
    My Glock identifies as a SIG.

    • @austindiaz6767
      @austindiaz6767 5 місяців тому +24

      But its drop safe

    • @RB-wt6pg
      @RB-wt6pg 5 місяців тому +20

      The Glock is the world's pistol.

    • @fudgerounds91
      @fudgerounds91 5 місяців тому +20

      Glocks are everyone's pistol. America's pistol is the 1911.

    • @nunzioification
      @nunzioification 5 місяців тому +3

      My Glock doesn’t like to talk about its lead issues

    • @ArmedAndIndigenous
      @ArmedAndIndigenous 5 місяців тому +3

      @@fudgerounds91 no its not fanboy, sale numbers don't lie

  • @GRAFFREVIEWS
    @GRAFFREVIEWS 5 місяців тому +316

    They should ban Dodge Chargers too.

    • @JR15A2
      @JR15A2 5 місяців тому +26

      And gangsta rap.

    • @TopShottaShorts
      @TopShottaShorts 5 місяців тому +5

      😂

    • @michaelatkin9649
      @michaelatkin9649 5 місяців тому +11

      It's more of the people that drive dodge challengers that should be banned. It's a certain demographic for some reason

    • @Anon54387
      @Anon54387 5 місяців тому +4

      Don't give them any ideas.

    • @Wheeling88
      @Wheeling88 5 місяців тому +7

      As a ford /chevy guy ,id agree. Anyone who would own one would drink budlight.

  • @markfree5248
    @markfree5248 5 місяців тому +72

    Just outlaw criminals and politicians.

    • @SeaJay_Oceans
      @SeaJay_Oceans 5 місяців тому

      You stutter ? The politicians are the criminals.

    • @paulhillar1833
      @paulhillar1833 5 місяців тому +8

      They're one in the same!

    • @MyronNoland
      @MyronNoland 4 місяці тому +4

      Aren't politicians implied when you speak about criminals!?!

    • @JonCarter-i3k
      @JonCarter-i3k 4 місяці тому +2

      @paulhillar1833 ... Dang !! You beat me to it !! Exactly what I was going to say.

    • @rudyschwab7709
      @rudyschwab7709 4 місяці тому

      I'd be happy if politicians would just start outlawing criminals and stop catering to their every need.

  • @chrism2042
    @chrism2042 5 місяців тому +26

    Chicago said they are suing Glock because they allow the pistols to be converted with the NON-GLOCK manufactured switch.
    What about Glock suing the city of Chicago for not locking criminals up and allowing them to use Glock pistols in crimes?

    • @rudyschwab7709
      @rudyschwab7709 4 місяці тому +2

      That does follow the same line of logic Chicago is using. I think it's worth a chance.

  • @MrKingArthurhk
    @MrKingArthurhk 5 місяців тому +98

    Weapons of war are military grade, which by the text of the 2A shall not be infringed. There wasn’t a standing National military until the War of 1812. All citizens kept and carried the same weapons as the most powerful military in the world then, the British.

    • @paulis7319
      @paulis7319 5 місяців тому +17

      Judging by how this country handled Afghanistan, it sure seems like our military should shut down and give the weaponry back to the citizens. It would be fun to have a Blackhawk or an F-35.

    • @AZ_Raven
      @AZ_Raven 5 місяців тому

      The muzzleloaders used in the Revolutionary War were "military grade weapons of war" at that time, and they were made with some pretty crappy tools and machinery by today's standards. I just shake my head when people say, "The Founders did not mean weapons of war when they wrote the Second Amendment."

    • @finngamesknudson1457
      @finngamesknudson1457 5 місяців тому +11

      Actually most American citizens had better rifles than the British military.

    • @garrettlundy3959
      @garrettlundy3959 5 місяців тому +8

      Nothing scares veterans more than something being ‘military grade’. 😂
      Keep that dogshit away from me!

    • @paulis7319
      @paulis7319 5 місяців тому +3

      @@garrettlundy3959 🤣🤣🤣But it's a good marketing gimmick for non-vets.

  • @thatoneguywhodoesthatthing913
    @thatoneguywhodoesthatthing913 5 місяців тому +60

    I feel like when a government bans a firearm, the manufacturer should suspend all business with said government.

    • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
      @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 5 місяців тому +18

      That’s what both Barrett and Serbu did with California and New York banning .50 cals. They refused to sell anything to LE in either state.

    • @brianwillochell2862
      @brianwillochell2862 5 місяців тому +6

      ​@@chemistryofquestionablequa6252 I'm pretty sure neither one if them will even do maintenance or warranty work on those firearms as well. I love it.

    • @chemistryofquestionablequa6252
      @chemistryofquestionablequa6252 5 місяців тому +5

      @@brianwillochell2862 yep, they’ve both refused.

    • @George-nt8uw
      @George-nt8uw 5 місяців тому

      But they won't.

    • @George-nt8uw
      @George-nt8uw 5 місяців тому

      @@brianwillochell2862 And the others jumped in to fill the void for their pockets.

  • @garymercerjr8545
    @garymercerjr8545 5 місяців тому +88

    They've pretty much admitted and will have to in court that technology has made the NFA unenforceable for this to have to be done.

    • @DMurray-cn6hp
      @DMurray-cn6hp 5 місяців тому +2

      Dude, you are on to something there!

    • @garymercerjr8545
      @garymercerjr8545 5 місяців тому +2

      @DMurray-cn6hp Yeah I saw a Vice story about Glock Switches and the AFT agent admitted the cats out of the bag they're powerless to stop them now. He just admitted on camera that the NFA is null and void because of technology.

    • @DMurray-cn6hp
      @DMurray-cn6hp 5 місяців тому +2

      @@garymercerjr8545 we better hope society works on being more humble to one another

  • @johnschofield9496
    @johnschofield9496 4 місяці тому +9

    Very well put. 2A has NEVER been about hunting, it's ALWAYS been about the very people who are in control today.

  • @Ungood-jl5ep
    @Ungood-jl5ep 5 місяців тому +32

    If that's not an infringement, then nothing is.

    • @daltongarrett7117
      @daltongarrett7117 5 місяців тому +3

      They would have you believe nothing is, you're on the same page now. Good.

    • @Ungood-jl5ep
      @Ungood-jl5ep 5 місяців тому +4

      ​@@daltongarrett7117 Yeah, nah. If this stands the constitution has no teeth and the scotus is impotent.

    • @daltongarrett7117
      @daltongarrett7117 5 місяців тому

      @@Ungood-jl5ep it's already been ruled they can't do that, but the control freaks would have you believe otherwise.

    • @lawrencepickering1564
      @lawrencepickering1564 5 місяців тому +1

      No offense but SCOTUS can make a ruling but can’t enforce said ruling…. So they have bark but no bite.

    • @daltongarrett7117
      @daltongarrett7117 5 місяців тому

      @@lawrencepickering1564 I'll point to segregation being ruled unconstitutional and the pushback that the country had to that.

  • @marctrossbach6560
    @marctrossbach6560 5 місяців тому +35

    That will solve everything. These folks are stellar

  • @ericsfishingadventures4433
    @ericsfishingadventures4433 5 місяців тому +26

    That look at the end is the same one millions of real Americans have.

  • @saltydriver3722
    @saltydriver3722 5 місяців тому +23

    If the military has it, I need it

    • @bangkokinc.4233
      @bangkokinc.4233 5 місяців тому +2

      Exactly f em, I want what they have, beside most of the clowns in there can’t even use them properly

    • @deucedeuce1572
      @deucedeuce1572 4 місяці тому +3

      ...and you don't just have the Right to own it... but the Duty to do so. It amazes me how cowardly and complicit we've become as a nation. I can only imagine if the Founding Fathers were so cowardly and selfish. They never could have accomplished anything. We truly dishonor them.

  • @SeaJay_Oceans
    @SeaJay_Oceans 5 місяців тому +8

    New York should BAN CRIME ! There, problem solved. Criminals will all say, " Oh, Gosh Darn it ! We didn't know New York was gonna ban Crime ! Now we have to move to New Jersey !"

    • @deucedeuce1572
      @deucedeuce1572 4 місяці тому

      ...or CA, where crime has been legalized. lol.

  • @miketaylorID1
    @miketaylorID1 5 місяців тому +28

    “In common use” Please oh please Hochul - trigger (on purpose) the lawsuits!!

  • @AmRock83
    @AmRock83 5 місяців тому +14

    There has been much f'in around by the gun grabbers. This is a "hold my beer" level of find out. We need to make sure we have enough popcorn on hand for this.

  • @hackaboom
    @hackaboom 5 місяців тому +12

    did they ever think about just making reckless endangerment and murder illegal?

  • @bryantphil5577
    @bryantphil5577 5 місяців тому +16

    You know how it works. They will do this, it takes YEARS to play court game so they get what they want. Even Bruen is being twisted to get what they want

  • @sokyoutdoors588
    @sokyoutdoors588 5 місяців тому +13

    This will open to the door to wiping the NFA off the books.

    • @Shadow__133
      @Shadow__133 5 місяців тому +3

      It's nice to dream big 😂

  • @MrKingArthurhk
    @MrKingArthurhk 5 місяців тому +47

    I like firearms. Some I hunt with, others I don’t. I like the taste of venison. Others don’t. I like meat, others don’t. More for me.

    • @NO-AH562
      @NO-AH562 5 місяців тому +5

      I don't want to assign intent from your comment, but it's really hard to take this any other way than you saying "well New York doesn't want guns so more for me I guess." If that is what you're saying, remember that we should stand up for the rights of everyone, even if it doesn't directly effect us today, because tomorrow it will be you and I.

    • @1776AxlePowerDM
      @1776AxlePowerDM 4 місяці тому +3

      @NO-AH562 exactly. That way of thinking is how we got to the tyrannical problems we have now. If it doesn't hurt me then I don't care. Horrible way of thinking.

  • @bfish9700
    @bfish9700 5 місяців тому +12

    I'd love to see them defend this in light of DC v Heller. That was LITERALLY about a handgun ban.

    • @ecobasetech4558
      @ecobasetech4558 5 місяців тому

      Actually I thought Hellwr was about banning tasers.....

    • @tec2388
      @tec2388 5 місяців тому +2

      @@ecobasetech4558 Caetano

    • @RB-wt6pg
      @RB-wt6pg 5 місяців тому

      ​@@ecobasetech4558 I believe in part yes but also hand sticks.

  •  4 місяці тому +3

    the state of NY has a LOT of money to fight a lawsuit against Glock. There's a lot of tax payers left in NY to pay for it. That's why there must be a way for states that lose a case as unconstitutional, the state attorney's office, governor and state assembly and senate should have to pay back the taxpayer money they used defending it. This will stop them from using our tax money to take away our rights.

  • @JRock3091
    @JRock3091 5 місяців тому +14

    So does this apply to the NYPD? They were the first major police department to adopt the Glock Handgun for police duty.

    • @michaelprather8371
      @michaelprather8371 5 місяців тому +13

      Of course police and military would be exempt. They are all highly trained marksmen AND safety experts.😉

    • @jeffl9534
      @jeffl9534 5 місяців тому +3

      ​@@michaelprather8371yes they are. each one will became a shooting instructor at some point down the road.😂

  • @DouglassBuzz
    @DouglassBuzz 5 місяців тому +7

    LMFAO, I'm not getting rid of either one of my Glocks, they weren't exactly cheap, and they didn't pay for them, I did, I worked the hours to pay for them, lol not giving them up.

  • @triggerdsilence
    @triggerdsilence 4 місяці тому +3

    The problem is they don't name Glock they name "convertible Pistols" which are any pistol that can be converted to a machine gun as defined by a convertible pistol with a pistol converter attached. This basically could openly ban all Semi-Auto pistols since the could be technically converted.

  • @ejari22
    @ejari22 5 місяців тому +22

    Here for the algorithm

  • @mikegeiman710
    @mikegeiman710 5 місяців тому +3

    Glock should immediately recall every handgun issued to New York State and every City in the State.

  • @dillonc7955
    @dillonc7955 5 місяців тому +5

    New York should give everyone a giant book of all the laws they created. I'm sure nobody will break them with how stupid and unenforced some of these laws and proposals are...

    • @rudyschwab7709
      @rudyschwab7709 4 місяці тому

      New Yorkers can use them as improvised body armor to protect themselves from the criminals who don't care what is written in those books.

  • @Sonic357
    @Sonic357 5 місяців тому +17

    What came 1st
    The Glock or
    The switch
    😮😂🤣😅

    • @daltongarrett7117
      @daltongarrett7117 5 місяців тому +1

      The switch unless you specifically mean the Glock switch. Then it's the Glock.

    • @Sonic357
      @Sonic357 5 місяців тому

      @daltongarrett7117 SMH, of course, the Glock switch😳

    • @nunzioification
      @nunzioification 5 місяців тому +1

      I bought my Nintendo switch a few months after my Glock20, wait what are they taking Mario away?

  • @pricklydingus8604
    @pricklydingus8604 5 місяців тому +6

    7:05
    The combination depression-era radio/helium addict voice you just pulled there. 💀

  • @soggycracker5934
    @soggycracker5934 5 місяців тому +4

    Okay, so Glock needs to PERMANENTLY cut off all agencies of the State of New York. Along with every other firearms, ammunition, and accessories manufacturers.

    • @_XR40_
      @_XR40_ 4 місяці тому

      Not a good idea. Have to remember that Glock is a _lowest-common-denominator_ weapon. Actually designed for people that don't tend to spend much time training or maintaining (thus the popularity). Do we really want the types of incompetents occupying most "State" agencies these days (the kind that mag-dump when an acorn hits a car roof) to be using more complex, demanding firearms?

  • @eddie10191
    @eddie10191 5 місяців тому +4

    All gun manufacturers stop sales to any and all LE and military. I don’t see any politician making them.

  • @sinisterthoughts2896
    @sinisterthoughts2896 5 місяців тому +10

    This could easily become abriar rabbit scenario.

  • @justinhorn2864
    @justinhorn2864 4 місяці тому +2

    That's why ATF never went after criminals with switches all done by design

    • @JohnVentarino-ey5ln
      @JohnVentarino-ey5ln 4 місяці тому

      The ATF is scared to go into Chicogo and other hoods to arrest criminals because they know they will be shot at by them 13 to 17 year old wanna be gang bangers. Instead they go to people that are totally legal with great jobs and family's because they know it's safe. It's a fucking joke they should be ashame of themselves.

  • @NickBlazer-cf1vs
    @NickBlazer-cf1vs 5 місяців тому +4

    Look how they negatively impacted the eight D Percent market.
    They are double the price.

  • @calvinj5558
    @calvinj5558 4 місяці тому +1

    I’m suing my auto manufacture for making me drive drunk, then fast food for making me fat…

  • @stephenarmstrong7354
    @stephenarmstrong7354 5 місяців тому +4

    Why are they not going after the importers of the switches? Why no increase of penalties for using a switch? You know why!

    • @HeartsOfDarkness
      @HeartsOfDarkness 5 місяців тому +2

      Dat would be racisms.

    • @sijul6483
      @sijul6483 5 місяців тому +1

      My hypothesis is the AFT are the ones distributing these switches.

  • @LarsLarsen77
    @LarsLarsen77 4 місяці тому +1

    Lawsuits take years. People are going to rot in jail over this.

  • @kevinmarrett9532
    @kevinmarrett9532 5 місяців тому +1

    They should ban Glock switches. Wonder why they just didn’t do that instead

  • @BlueMarten
    @BlueMarten 5 місяців тому +3

    - Oh New York, you silly goose.

  • @johnlyons1292
    @johnlyons1292 4 місяці тому

    The state needs to streamline prosecutions on purchasing and using glock switches instead of banning the Glock handgun in general and not wait for the Federal Government to do so.

  • @robertjackson574
    @robertjackson574 4 місяці тому

    I agree with you 100 percent. It scares me to think that there are people like that in the world

  • @Mavrick2787
    @Mavrick2787 5 місяців тому +1

    Its not about winning. Its about passing legislation that looks like its progressive, and doing something. My friend asked me how they can do this. At this point its like this. Pass whatever legislation you want. Force third parties to spend money to fight against these in court. Allow for appeal. Fight appeal. As long as there is a anti gun stay in place, the law is still in effect. Thats how NYS operates.

  • @darthhodges
    @darthhodges 5 місяців тому +3

    It also won't do a thing to reduce the number of illegal machine guns in the hands of criminals. Firstly, no criminal will voluntarily turn their Glock in. Second, they will still be able to get Glocks by stealing them from the police, something they already do at alarmingly high rates. Thirdly, the number of companies that aren't Glock but make guns fully compatible with Glock parts (including said switches) guarantees the law would be ineffective even if points one and two didn't apply.

    • @masonmax1000
      @masonmax1000 5 місяців тому

      if anything a ban on Glock will make the illegal marked bigger

  • @brianbevard7815
    @brianbevard7815 5 місяців тому +5

    Glock might have money but is it more or less than 1% of nyc annual gross local product?

    • @jeffl9534
      @jeffl9534 5 місяців тому

      TAXES.

    • @Skewerz9
      @Skewerz9 5 місяців тому

      NYC is 97 BILLION dollars in debt...

  • @Darth_Boons
    @Darth_Boons 5 місяців тому +4

    Thank you

  • @ghostpunkkilla
    @ghostpunkkilla 5 місяців тому +1

    NY FAFO's and produces the Bruen decision.
    NY: "I'll F'in do it again!"

  • @sleeperno1215
    @sleeperno1215 4 місяці тому

    The Glock 19 is the 1851 Navy of the 21st century. If I am Glock, I’d refuse to sell to police departments in New York State.

  • @trusttech9942
    @trusttech9942 5 місяців тому +1

    I’m behind enemy lines on Long Island and this is a real hoot. It’s amazing that they can even think this can even be a proposal 😝

  • @BikerDash
    @BikerDash 5 місяців тому

    A 2011 with a Series 80 style trigger safety is even easier to convert to full auto. Snip coils off the firing pin spring until you get slam firing. Release the trigger, and the blocking pin stops the multi-pew fun.

  • @UndiagnosedGenXer
    @UndiagnosedGenXer 5 місяців тому +2

    "Give us an excuse. "
    Amen brother

  • @5jjt
    @5jjt 4 місяці тому

    Glock should recall every Glock issued to NY police and not give them back.

  • @grigorirasputin5020
    @grigorirasputin5020 4 місяці тому

    Ideally, Glock would refuse to sell, service, or provide spare parts to any LE or like governmental agencies in a jurisdiction that outlaws their weapons.

  • @damienroser8004
    @damienroser8004 5 місяців тому

    I don't care if it's common use or rarest gun ever created. They have no right limiting our rights at all.

  • @fastdude2002
    @fastdude2002 5 місяців тому +1

    They should also ban shotguns because criminals often cut the barrels down to make them easier to conceal…about as stupid as their striker fired ban.

  • @franklinmarks7845
    @franklinmarks7845 5 місяців тому +3

    Even if they did band Glocks and there were no more Glock switches or Glocks on the streets guess what they would make a switch for Kel-Tec they would make the switch for Sig they would make the switch for a Taurus really surprised it hasn't happened yet

    • @fastdude2002
      @fastdude2002 5 місяців тому

      They should also ban shotguns because criminals often cut the barrels down to make them easier to conceal.

  • @georgediaz1291
    @georgediaz1291 4 місяці тому

    I have friends and, cousins that live in Houston, Texas, this type of ban will never happen there, only in New York, Chicago, this silly nonsense will happen.

  • @patwaters3486
    @patwaters3486 5 місяців тому

    They should make these Switch things illegal. Any criminal caught commiting a criminal act with one of these Switches should be charged in Federal court.
    Has anyone thought of taking these measures?

  • @jeffhays1968
    @jeffhays1968 5 місяців тому

    In the spirit of Texas suppressor law, if I print a switch at home and shoot it only on my own home range did I break a law ? Is it a MG or no?

  • @p99guy
    @p99guy 4 місяці тому

    I have 6 Glocks currently.. lifetime total so far has been 11

  • @austinfitts4014
    @austinfitts4014 5 місяців тому

    Massachusetts banned Glocks for purchase for all except LEO a while ago. You can have them private transferred to you or buy gen 1/2 Glocks but that’s about it.

  • @ernestholloway9436
    @ernestholloway9436 4 місяці тому

    I want to say this before I say anything. I am a legal firearm owner. I am the owner of 4 guns. I do not own any glock guns. I do feel they should be band until they fix the damn problem with those switches. The police or law enforcement should have them.

  • @cesarmagdaleno6009
    @cesarmagdaleno6009 5 місяців тому

    I agree with you. Not only that ATF is stirring the hornets nest. But I also hope all gun manufacturers jump in. This is ridiculous.

  • @rayhull5051
    @rayhull5051 4 місяці тому

    My Glock identifies as a cordless hole puncher! Of course, some activist judges in the state of NY think (incorrectly I might add) that the 2nd amendment doesn't exist in their state.

  • @outdoorlife5396
    @outdoorlife5396 5 місяців тому

    Hey, I thought the same thing about NC and VA suing the Tobacco companies. Worse than that, the Tobacco companies could not say they will not sell their products in those states. It was too much of a cash cow. Now the alcohol companies, beer, wine and spirits saw that they were next and shut it down.

  • @mariadispenza2958
    @mariadispenza2958 4 місяці тому

    The local news in Albany shows a demo of a Glock with a switch and a Drum Mag ( both banned already in NY) for effect. I am sure the effect would be different with a 10 round which is the limit in NY. So basically we are going to ban Glocks and punish us because some criminal uses a gun with 2 illegal items attached. Who would use their own licensed firearm to do this, no one that's who. What happens to my two new Glocks, they get taken away? When this gets overturned I am sure they won't be giving them back. What happen to " We just want the Assault Rifles, we will never take your Handguns"

  • @WOLF3GOIF
    @WOLF3GOIF 5 місяців тому

    Ban something that is already all over the world? Its the Ak47 of pistols and will outlast any ban. These gun grabbers are delusional.

  • @tjs-_goated7449
    @tjs-_goated7449 4 місяці тому

    I just bought a Glock and if they ban glock, then I want my money back. That would be fair.

  • @ytsirklin
    @ytsirklin 5 місяців тому

    This is what happens when people who never shot a firearm decide to make laws.

  • @MDgunship
    @MDgunship 4 місяці тому

    While I agree that the number of hunters is declining, they are still a major portion of gun owners.

  • @timhallas4275
    @timhallas4275 5 місяців тому

    It's like banning Chevys, because Idlebrock makes a manifold for the Chevy V8 that increases horsepower.

  • @p99guy
    @p99guy 4 місяці тому

    So what are police going to carry in NYS? Because Glocks are predominantly what most departments use including NYPD

  • @graymikep64
    @graymikep64 4 місяці тому

    One word.
    Remington..
    Dont be so sure...this wouldn't be the 1st time

  • @dylanholloway6983
    @dylanholloway6983 4 місяці тому

    To the weapons of war argument, it has been a historical baseline in our country's history that citizens have always been armed with better equipment than the military until the last 100 years.

  • @Patriotusa44
    @Patriotusa44 5 місяців тому +2

    They always go to the extreme method to solve "issues".

    • @joeg5414
      @joeg5414 5 місяців тому +1

      That's because they're issues they've created so they could "solve" them

  • @joeg5414
    @joeg5414 5 місяців тому

    I'm confused. How will banning a gun prevent criminals from using an already banned device on said gun?

  • @CitizenCarrier
    @CitizenCarrier 5 місяців тому

    I banned Glock from my belt a long time ago. Only because I prefer Walther. 😂

  • @glennsammon4465
    @glennsammon4465 4 місяці тому

    and what about all the police Depatments and government agencies that use this product. plus how do you get past Bruin?

  • @toxico1152
    @toxico1152 5 місяців тому +1

    My rifle is a weapon of war and I’m tired of pretending that it’s not

    • @BK_2016sr5
      @BK_2016sr5 5 місяців тому

      lol

    • @rudyschwab7709
      @rudyschwab7709 4 місяці тому

      I think most people want to be ready to adequately defend their homes when the war the lunatic left is trying to create finally starts coming down our streets.

  • @MadShooter
    @MadShooter 4 місяці тому

    What’s the lower in the thumb clip?

  • @NoOneSpecial4212
    @NoOneSpecial4212 4 місяці тому

    Good thing I know a man down the street that will sell me any Glock I want for 400 bucks . 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @michaelprather8371
    @michaelprather8371 5 місяців тому

    You went where I thought you would when I saw the title. I agree with you and I hope we’re right. I see this as their first step to banning all semi automatic guns(AR’s especially) under the guise of being
    “ too easily “ converted to fun mode.

  • @TheBetterManInBlack
    @TheBetterManInBlack 5 місяців тому

    My concern is that the blues will continue to double down and flat out ignore SCOTUS rulings over and over, while continuing to drag everything through the courts forever.

  • @grumpycat7826
    @grumpycat7826 4 місяці тому

    The utter stupidity of NY and CA politicians never ceases to amaze me! Smh 🤦🏻

  • @sleeperno1215
    @sleeperno1215 4 місяці тому

    Good point. Under Bruen, it is per se unconstitutional.

  • @chasecarter8848
    @chasecarter8848 5 місяців тому

    From what I've seen, giving a banger with no shooting skills an 1100 rpm machine pistol actually makes the public safer because they already couldn't shoot straight, and automating the process only makes their accuracy even worse. You can't miss fast enough to win a gun fight.

    • @vicerichter1163
      @vicerichter1163 5 місяців тому

      Too bad innocent folks catch stray rounds tho

  • @briandavenport8971
    @briandavenport8971 4 місяці тому

    It’s like the 80’s all over again.

  • @C2welder
    @C2welder 4 місяці тому

    The phrase “sporting purpose” makes my blood boil.

  • @AFreakinProblem
    @AFreakinProblem 5 місяців тому

    This may put machineguns into common use status (if pre-86 ones aren’t already). At the very least it will be proven that the NFA is unenforceable.

  • @JasonColino
    @JasonColino 5 місяців тому

    Problem is NYS had the bruen and then they made a new law after that and were screwed even harder now.

  • @Gunrunner223
    @Gunrunner223 4 місяці тому

    Wouldnt all this be easier, if they would just make violent crime illegal? I mean, we could all get behind that.

  • @colt10mmsecurity68
    @colt10mmsecurity68 4 місяці тому

    All gun and ammo companies should come together and tell NY that they will no longer sell any LE agency guns nor ammo, period! That means the state police, local police, sheriff’s and the governor’s security detail get N O T H I N G for their sworn cops anymore.

    • @rudyschwab7709
      @rudyschwab7709 4 місяці тому

      They'll just start making straw purchases. Never count on politicians to tell us to not do something, and then not abide by it themselves.

  • @crjcrj8443
    @crjcrj8443 5 місяців тому

    It’s just not Glock . It’s almost every striker fired pistol like M&P, Sig, Canik etc.

    • @WAYGULOLBEEF
      @WAYGULOLBEEF 5 місяців тому

      nearly any semi auto can easily be converted to go full auto relatively easily

  • @tonyarmstrong2650
    @tonyarmstrong2650 5 місяців тому

    Go after the guy that invented the damn switch! In the Navy, we were trained to fight the fire at its source!

  • @VCBird6
    @VCBird6 5 місяців тому

    Average CZ owner: hope they don't google up the CZ75A 😂

  • @Orphican
    @Orphican 4 місяці тому

    I bet Sig is feeling torn over helping the competition or saving themselves future grief.

  • @keithplymale2374
    @keithplymale2374 5 місяців тому

    Not surprised at anything that comes out of a Democratic Socialist People's Republic like New York. In fact the only thing that surprises me is Kalifornia did not come out with this first.

  • @Tadicuslegion78
    @Tadicuslegion78 5 місяців тому

    Don't New York Police Departments all over the state use Glocks?

  • @mikechampion1614
    @mikechampion1614 5 місяців тому

    The bill would also allow for bans on many of . If not all semi autos.