How would she have access to the car, how would she have got to the car in the middle of a massive public search for her, how would she know he was driving that car that day, why would she spray one drop of her blood in the footwell and all the rest of it on the underside of the boot cover? It's just so utterly implausible.
How would his wife's blood be in his friend's car? The blood needs to be retested independently. He says the police only found it after the third inspection. How would the police have her blood.
Well that’s a great question but we are talking about the UK where they maintain things differently. Is there a storage bank of blood from doctor visits or had she donated blood? I really don’t know but that’s possible.
Its a great question and did police cross-reference DNA from say hair from her home to establish this?//It does seem that the blood was planted bcus theres just no way it would have been missed in 2 previous forensic examinations.She didnt plant it.She would not have left the money and the children.Hes been framed by the actual killer imho and still GR cant get his head around this.Somehow police were spun into this 3rd examination .How? But something happened of a v unusual nature to convince police a 3rd look was needed.Its v clear that LR was abducted from an alley as she walked to work at a time when GR was on a landline call at his home.
"Linda's gone missing before" These murderers always try to make it seem like it was the norm for their spouse to just up and disappear for a few days, like that's just common behavior for people.
Just read a Somerset online article on this and he did it. I think he is very annoyed that he got convicted just based off 3 blood splatters in a friends car he drove. He hated her over child maintenance and had his bank accounts frozen over it…that made him furious.
He was completely wrong in his argument not to take a lie detector test saying there was no upside and had no merit not doing it made him look guilty to everyone even to someone whos supposed to be impartial it's still there. that was the deciding factor for me. a genuine innocent person would have nothing to fear and do anything.
I agree & he back tracked over it, he initially said he would take one, his actions over it look as bad as failing one. He can't reasonably explain the blood in the boot of the car either. He should've just admitted it, led police to her body and he'd probably be free by now.
`Only an idiot would take what you eroneously call a lie ditector test ..Firstly its called a polygraph test , secondly , He was initially very keen to take the test but any right minded legal representation would advise him not to becuase the polygraph test is junk science which is why its so derided and inadmissable in court .... What possible advantage would there be Glynn Razzell to take a polygraph test ?
I agree, his attitude is very off-putting. His comments about her 'deliberately disappearing' to get him arrested, having someone plant blood and then returning bloody and bruised claiming he abducted her sound very off.
OK he might have had some plausibility if he hadn't been so vindictive to say she planted the blood. In his friend's car he randomly used that day? After 3 police examinations? Hmmm. So she reappeared a week after going missing and HIS friend let HER put blood in the car in the vague hope they would re examine? I do however agree at the very least the person examining the car the first 2 times was incompetent or slapdash. The gentle moving her to 1 side and she went thru a glass panel!! I agree sounds so unrealistic.
A friend of hers did say she saw Linda a day after she was meant to have disappeared, driving a silver fiesta through Highworth. apparently Linda looked annoyed that her friend saw her. Linda's boyfriend was following Glyn such as asking his neighbours for information in the 2 weeks before Linda disappeared, Linda's boyfriend was not where he said he was on the day she disappeared according to phone records. Linda's boyfriend knew that Glyn was using his friends car when questioned the day after her disappearance. Linda had a picture of Glyn's new rental home uploaded on her PC 2 days before she disappeared, her and her boyfriend visited 3 banks the day before she disappeared with money withdrawn according to CCTV, Linda (according to her children) was calmer than normal that morning , she also only said "goodbye" instead of "see you at 5:00", she didn't bring her staff ID that she needed with her that morning or her emergency phone for her children's number that she normally brought with her, she had circled the date of her disappearance with a question mark, she has a history of mental illness and disappearing, which according to her children looked like her symptoms were coming back, she was a fluent French speaker and had the address of an ambassador for Burundi (french speaking) , she had been on a cheap flights website shortly before she disappeared, she was in financial problems and very bitter towards Glyn for having a new relationship, Glyn's neighbour confirmed that his car was in the driveway at 9:30am and at 11am when she returned from shopping. There is evidence that the phone was moved a mile and returned at a time (via phone masts) that just happens to coincide with the same time the boyfriend was checking Linda's car. The initial police briefing stated that the phone looked staged. A witness did describe Linda walking quickly and looking upset after the alleyway.
So, she's alive and hiding somewhere and letting him take the blame for killing her & going to prison? And she left her children when ppl said she'd never do that?? Plus, she went into hiding without any money???
I'm surprised they even reviewed this case, her blood was found in the boot of the car he'd been driving. He'd have a better chance to get out just admitting it & telling where her body is, he would probably have been released by now, I don't see why he chanced it writing to inside justice, he's obviously done it & they were never gonna find anything to exonerate him, refusing a lie detector test at the last minute after he initially said he would take one is pretty damming as well.
@@jimmynich4791 Yeah, Louise Shorter all but says "we've wasted our time here". Was an interesting couple of programmes though, and I can see why they took it on. The fact it took 3 goes to find the blood, the Halliwell possibility (which turned out to be weak) and Glynn Razzell seemed very presentable.
I don't know for sure whether he's guilty but he has definitely not convinced me of his innocence. I don't feel that this is an unsafe conviction. As a personal opinion, I don't trust him because he came up with a reason not to take the polygraph that doesn't ring truthful after saying quite definitively that he would (suspicious of the characteristic future faking of a narcissist) and he smears her. He has quite a number of narcissistic indicators that would make him capable of committing this crime.
British marriage laws should also be in the dock. It's mad that you have to give half your stuff away to someone just because you slept with them for a few years. It's unjust, anachronistic and the trigger for a great deal of violence. We should adopt the continental system of separation of property.
He has a _very_ strong motive for continuing to assert innocence. If he is proven to have been imprisoned due to an unsafe conviction he will get hundreds of thousands, and likely into the millions, in compensation. If he is released on parole he will be over retirement age, have no assets due to Proceeds of Crime and will be unemployable. He's playing a financial gamble and if he loses staying in prison is actually the better option, which he clearly realises
Its painful watching the the expert fumbling her way through an explanation of why there was no blood found in the boot of the car on the first 2 times the police examined the Laguna....
The thing is ... the smartest thing he could have done is take the polygraph.. sure its not admissible in court ect.. but if he passes he would surley get a parole meeting But equally if he fails then he can say were the body is and get parole hearing. Having been knocked back recently for parole for failing to provide details of were the body is.
Certainly wouldn't have hurt to take one, he's in prison anyway, he's got nothing to lose, if he was a free man being accused & asked to take one I can see why he'd refuse one, if he's guilty. The only reason I think why he'd refuse one is because he's guilty. Inside Justice should've just insisted they'd look into his case if he took a polygraph first.
Polygraph Vulnerabilities The polygraph is still vulnerable to both physical and psychological countermeasures and it also suffers from a significant error rate based upon inconclusive, false positives, or false negatives results. Generally speaking, polygraph test results are inadmissible in court, as they are not scientifically reliable enough for use when the stakes are so high as in court. This is because it is well documented that certain people can pass the pass the test while lying and other who are telling the truth can fail the test.
As with most of the people here, I 💯 believe they have the right man. Everything points to him and any alternative suggestions as to what happened to her are ridiculous. It’s obvious he wasn’t too fond or kindly towards Linda and he had everything to benefit from her permanently disappearing. He also doesn’t seem too bothered that his children have nothing to do with him. Guess we’ll find out more in part 2 and the possible connection Linda had with this convicted murderer Halliwell. On a side note, I think Glyn has Dennis Rader eyes.
He refused a polygraph & her blood was found in a car he was driving. An innocent man wouldn't refuse a polygraph & he can't explain why there was her blood in the car, he says she must've planted it and she's still alive but there's no trace of her. Why would she run off & frame him and did she have the resources to uproots and live as someone else?
@@jimmynich4791can see why he would refuse it, he thought they had built up a good case at that time and if he had failed it would look bad, he’s been inside for 14 years you would be skeptical about a lie detector that isn’t 100% accurate
@jamesward3214 It's 90%+ accurate and he said he would take one originally only to refuse when they turned up to do it. Also as far as I'm aware the test was just for the charity & polygraphs are not admissible evidence in UK courts. Maybe it wouldn't look good if he failed but it would look great if he passed & if I was inside for 14 years for something I didn't do I'd be willing to try anything that could help me, he did do it though, his wife's blood was found in the boot of the car he was driving and the experts determined that it wasn't planted.
i feel like his alibi is key here. why would he put himself close to the police station if he wasn't actually there? yet i can't tell if he's guilty or not. he might've had someone else do it, as the 1 minute to abduct her seems like too little time to me
@@odysseusisnobodyhe also pointed out other cameras along the route he took but the police failed to check them in time before they were written over.
i think there should be a cold case squad channel with up to date info etc that would be great also baffles me just how many people simply vanish without trace
She’s says I’m interested in why he’s pushing with only about another year left on his sentence. Obviously this lady has never spent 1 night in jail. I spent 1 night and it’s hell. So if he gets out 1 day early he’ll still be a happy man
My theory is that he killed her and deliberately switched his phone off during the two hour or so time period he successfully disposed of her body. Would have been interesting to have some idea how many miles the Laguna was driven while in his possession. I think he specifically planned the deed for the time he would have use of someone else's vehicle because perhaps Linda wouldn't recognize him in it and a possible way to point the blame on his friend somehow later. I don't know but I tend to believe this man is guilty and thinks he did a smart enough job that he shouldn't have been found guilty.
Question is how can no CCTv find him driving . Also why no mention of her new boyfriend who was lurking around the house asking people if Glynn still lived there
The boyfriends phone records also show he wasn't where he said he was on the day of her disappearance and he just so happened to be looking for Linda's car at the same time that they believe her phone was moved around a mile away from the alleyway (and returned) from phone masts evidence.
@@Xtsco11I disagree with the outcome of the case. I think the inveistavting lady closed the case when he refused the polygraph test. Very strange case, I don't think Glyn did it
I have listened these crime stories believing someone was definitely guilty only to learn they were innocent and feeling very judgmental afterwards. This could be us!
1st examination by two detectives spent 40 minutes , zilch. 2nd by two forensic specialists who both spent five hours, nada and then the owner of the vehicle had to wash every single bit of the interior and saw nothing. If Glynne was taken out of the case then a very simple case can be made that she disappeared of her own volition!
If this geezer supposedly abducted this woman when she was late yet he was matriculate time keeper, so if that's so he turns up when she is supposed to be there, thus would miss her because she was late???
Ive just watched parts 1 and 2 on netflix. If i were convicted of and in prison for something i had not done i would bite your hand off if you offered me a polygraph test. I think his last minute refusal to take the polygraph was extremely suspicious. An innocent man would leap at the chance to clear his name, even if there was a small chance of this false positive. I believe he knows much more about his wife's disappearence.
And you wouldn't say, "I don't think the blood was in the car....." as rebuttal for evidence showing there was. If you are completely innocent and you know it, your reaction would be to say that there's NO WAY possible his wife's blood could be found in the boot if that car because she was never in it at all and definitely not in it while he had use of it.
Lie detector lol. A device that even it's creator , called Frankenstein's monster. Then spent the rest of his life trying to get it out of use. Good first step🤦🏻♂️
He is lying. Why wouldn't she had just left and taken the kids. I can't believe she would not have contacted the kids. Is he claiming she didn't love the kids. Why would she have been afraid to just leave. Was it her blood in the car, if it were planted where would they have gotten it? If he was not locked up, he could have added the blood to incriminate her.
His defence was so weak. Felt like excuses with him, like for example accidentally giving the police the wrong trousers and other bits. To be honest I thought he came across pretty cocky when he was talking to the woman and my mam thought the same.
The time he was supposed to have abducted her, well she was late the police say that he only had a minute to abducted her yet he didn't know she was going to be late or by how long, wouldn't he of just got cold feet in the end and decided that that time wasn't the right time, after so many minutes that had rolled past waiting to abducted her, he would of left and decide to abduct her another day
If he was planning to grab her in the alley it would have made more sense for him to park somewhere on the route she would take near the alley, knowing she would drive passed this place. Then he would wait till she drives past up the alley to park her car. He would know that this is the ideal time to drive into the alley to wait for her to park just around the corner and walk back down the alley. He would only need to be in the alley for this time period which would take her under a minute to get to. He could have easily had his boot open and been stood against a side wall. Hits her on the head and throws her in the boot and drives off in seconds, leaving her phone on the side so it can not be traced. He may have only had a minute to actually commit the crime but he had time to sit and watch the route waiting for her to arrive. It would not have mattered if she was 5 minuets late as he could sit and wait. The timing showed he had enough time to get there even if she was on time , with a few minutes to spare. Let's be honest the longer he is sat there in a car waiting the higher the chance of him being spotted. He clearly had planned this for that day and I have no doubt that the 5 mins she was late did not cause too much of a problem.for him.
He did not do it but he had someone do it for him. He doesn’t look like a guy who takes a two hour walk and turns his phone off . Most likely he met up with the person who took her and finished her off.
How would she have access to the car, how would she have got to the car in the middle of a massive public search for her, how would she know he was driving that car that day, why would she spray one drop of her blood in the footwell and all the rest of it on the underside of the boot cover? It's just so utterly implausible.
How would his wife's blood be in his friend's car? The blood needs to be retested independently. He says the police only found it after the third inspection. How would the police have her blood.
Could his friend be involved!
The police might have planted the blood, or lied about it being there. I don't believe this to be necessarily true, but it is POSSIBLE.
@@miked4027Did his friend convince him to refuse a polygraph at the last minute as well? He did it.
If the police planted the blood, who provided the blood??
He thought she planted it.
Well that’s a great question but we are talking about the UK where they maintain things differently. Is there a storage bank of blood from doctor visits or had she donated blood? I really don’t know but that’s possible.
Exactly!! Nobody planted it. It got there because she'd been in the boot of that car injured and possibly already dead.
Its a great question and did police cross-reference DNA from say hair from her home to establish this?//It does seem that the blood was planted bcus theres just no way it would have been missed in 2 previous forensic examinations.She didnt plant it.She would not have left the money and the children.Hes been framed by the actual killer imho and still GR cant get his head around this.Somehow police were spun into this 3rd examination .How? But something happened of a v unusual nature to convince police a 3rd look was needed.Its v clear that LR was abducted from an alley as she walked to work at a time when GR was on a landline call at his home.
My mam said that also!. As I said his defence was weak.
"Linda's gone missing before" These murderers always try to make it seem like it was the norm for their spouse to just up and disappear for a few days, like that's just common behavior for people.
But she literally had though, she had mental health problems etc and would disappear with the children.
Im getting hooked on these Inside Justice❤
"I've been in prison for 14 years and I've had enough of it".. he did it.
Just read a Somerset online article on this and he did it. I think he is very annoyed that he got convicted just based off 3 blood splatters in a friends car he drove.
He hated her over child maintenance and had his bank accounts frozen over it…that made him furious.
He was completely wrong in his argument not to take a lie detector test saying there was no upside and had no merit not doing it made him look guilty to everyone even to someone whos supposed to be impartial it's still there. that was the deciding factor for me.
a genuine innocent person would have nothing to fear and do anything.
I agree & he back tracked over it, he initially said he would take one, his actions over it look as bad as failing one. He can't reasonably explain the blood in the boot of the car either. He should've just admitted it, led police to her body and he'd probably be free by now.
`Only an idiot would take what you eroneously call a lie ditector test ..Firstly its called a polygraph test , secondly , He was initially very keen to take the test but any right minded legal representation would advise him not to becuase the polygraph test is junk science which is why its so derided and inadmissable in court .... What possible advantage would there be Glynn Razzell to take a polygraph test ?
Not true. Many innocent people are behind bars.
Lie detector tests are absolute rhubarb. Yank nonsense.
I think his mistake was to suggest that she deliberately disappeared. His attitude through out is a bit off
I agree, his attitude is very off-putting. His comments about her 'deliberately disappearing' to get him arrested, having someone plant blood and then returning bloody and bruised claiming he abducted her sound very off.
Agree
Innocent till proven guilty
And no dirty money involved
Yes
OK he might have had some plausibility if he hadn't been so vindictive to say she planted the blood. In his friend's car he randomly used that day? After 3 police examinations? Hmmm. So she reappeared a week after going missing and HIS friend let HER put blood in the car in the vague hope they would re examine? I do however agree at the very least the person examining the car the first 2 times was incompetent or slapdash. The gentle moving her to 1 side and she went thru a glass panel!! I agree sounds so unrealistic.
A friend of hers did say she saw Linda a day after she was meant to have disappeared, driving a silver fiesta through Highworth. apparently Linda looked annoyed that her friend saw her. Linda's boyfriend was following Glyn such as asking his neighbours for information in the 2 weeks before Linda disappeared, Linda's boyfriend was not where he said he was on the day she disappeared according to phone records. Linda's boyfriend knew that Glyn was using his friends car when questioned the day after her disappearance. Linda had a picture of Glyn's new rental home uploaded on her PC 2 days before she disappeared, her and her boyfriend visited 3 banks the day before she disappeared with money withdrawn according to CCTV, Linda (according to her children) was calmer than normal that morning , she also only said "goodbye" instead of "see you at 5:00", she didn't bring her staff ID that she needed with her that morning or her emergency phone for her children's number that she normally brought with her, she had circled the date of her disappearance with a question mark, she has a history of mental illness and disappearing, which according to her children looked like her symptoms were coming back, she was a fluent French speaker and had the address of an ambassador for Burundi (french speaking) , she had been on a cheap flights website shortly before she disappeared, she was in financial problems and very bitter towards Glyn for having a new relationship, Glyn's neighbour confirmed that his car was in the driveway at 9:30am and at 11am when she returned from shopping. There is evidence that the phone was moved a mile and returned at a time (via phone masts) that just happens to coincide with the same time the boyfriend was checking Linda's car. The initial police briefing stated that the phone looked staged. A witness did describe Linda walking quickly and looking upset after the alleyway.
So, she's alive and hiding somewhere and letting him take the blame for killing her & going to prison? And she left her children when ppl said she'd never do that?? Plus, she went into hiding without any money???
Yes! Isn't too hard to believe is it? Lol
I'm surprised they even reviewed this case, her blood was found in the boot of the car he'd been driving. He'd have a better chance to get out just admitting it & telling where her body is, he would probably have been released by now, I don't see why he chanced it writing to inside justice, he's obviously done it & they were never gonna find anything to exonerate him, refusing a lie detector test at the last minute after he initially said he would take one is pretty damming as well.
There was a better episode they done were I’m convinced the guys innocent. This guy is as guilty as sin though
@@jimmynich4791 Yeah, Louise Shorter all but says "we've wasted our time here". Was an interesting couple of programmes though, and I can see why they took it on. The fact it took 3 goes to find the blood, the Halliwell possibility (which turned out to be weak) and Glynn Razzell seemed very presentable.
I don't know for sure whether he's guilty but he has definitely not convinced me of his innocence. I don't feel that this is an unsafe conviction. As a personal opinion, I don't trust him because he came up with a reason not to take the polygraph that doesn't ring truthful after saying quite definitively that he would (suspicious of the characteristic future faking of a narcissist) and he smears her. He has quite a number of narcissistic indicators that would make him capable of committing this crime.
I agree 👍
British marriage laws should also be in the dock. It's mad that you have to give half your stuff away to someone just because you slept with them for a few years. It's unjust, anachronistic and the trigger for a great deal of violence. We should adopt the continental system of separation of property.
Really good--thanks
Does anyone know how to get part 2. UA-cam says not available
It's on Netflix
He has a _very_ strong motive for continuing to assert innocence. If he is proven to have been imprisoned due to an unsafe conviction he will get hundreds of thousands, and likely into the millions, in compensation. If he is released on parole he will be over retirement age, have no assets due to Proceeds of Crime and will be unemployable. He's playing a financial gamble and if he loses staying in prison is actually the better option, which he clearly realises
Its painful watching the the expert fumbling her way through an explanation of why there was no blood found in the boot of the car on the first 2 times the police examined the Laguna....
The thing is ... the smartest thing he could have done is take the polygraph.. sure its not admissible in court ect.. but if he passes he would surley get a parole meeting
But equally if he fails then he can say were the body is and get parole hearing. Having been knocked back recently for parole for failing to provide details of were the body is.
Certainly wouldn't have hurt to take one, he's in prison anyway, he's got nothing to lose, if he was a free man being accused & asked to take one I can see why he'd refuse one, if he's guilty. The only reason I think why he'd refuse one is because he's guilty. Inside Justice should've just insisted they'd look into his case if he took a polygraph first.
Hi please please can you upload part 2?
There’s a good 2 part documentary on Netflix
Polygraph Vulnerabilities
The polygraph is still vulnerable to both physical and psychological countermeasures and it also suffers from a significant error rate based upon inconclusive, false positives, or false negatives results.
Generally speaking, polygraph test results are inadmissible in court, as they are not scientifically reliable enough for use when the stakes are so high as in court. This is because it is well documented that certain people can pass the pass the test while lying and other who are telling the truth can fail the test.
As with most of the people here, I 💯 believe they have the right man. Everything points to him and any alternative suggestions as to what happened to her are ridiculous. It’s obvious he wasn’t too fond or kindly towards Linda and he had everything to benefit from her permanently disappearing. He also doesn’t seem too bothered that his children have nothing to do with him. Guess we’ll find out more in part 2 and the possible connection Linda had with this convicted murderer Halliwell. On a side note, I think Glyn has Dennis Rader eyes.
For some reason this husband seems to be innocent to me....if so, what a strong person he is...
He refused a polygraph & her blood was found in a car he was driving. An innocent man wouldn't refuse a polygraph & he can't explain why there was her blood in the car, he says she must've planted it and she's still alive but there's no trace of her. Why would she run off & frame him and did she have the resources to uproots and live as someone else?
There’s a 2 part documentary on Netflix
@@jimmynich4791can see why he would refuse it, he thought they had built up a good case at that time and if he had failed it would look bad, he’s been inside for 14 years you would be skeptical about a lie detector that isn’t 100% accurate
@jamesward3214 It's 90%+ accurate and he said he would take one originally only to refuse when they turned up to do it. Also as far as I'm aware the test was just for the charity & polygraphs are not admissible evidence in UK courts. Maybe it wouldn't look good if he failed but it would look great if he passed & if I was inside for 14 years for something I didn't do I'd be willing to try anything that could help me, he did do it though, his wife's blood was found in the boot of the car he was driving and the experts determined that it wasn't planted.
Have a look at part 2 over here: ua-cam.com/video/wNckblFGPzk/v-deo.html
Link doesn't work.
i feel like his alibi is key here. why would he put himself close to the police station if he wasn't actually there? yet i can't tell if he's guilty or not. he might've had someone else do it, as the 1 minute to abduct her seems like too little time to me
Surely if he'd had someone else do it he'd have firmed his alibi up? Been with people who can vouch during the moments of the supposed abduction?
@@odysseusisnobodyhe also pointed out other cameras along the route he took but the police failed to check them in time before they were written over.
i think there should be a cold case squad channel with up to date info etc that would be great also baffles me just how many people simply vanish without trace
Where can I watch part 2???
The description says part 2 is coming soon. They're usually really good at putting up subsequent parts pretty quickly so it shouldn't be too long. 😊
let us know when part 2 is up!
Good 2 part documentary on Netflix
She’s says I’m interested in why he’s pushing with only about another year left on his sentence. Obviously this lady has never spent 1 night in jail. I spent 1 night and it’s hell. So if he gets out 1 day early he’ll still be a happy man
Correct
He will get a lot of money if he will be innocent and was in prison for so many years.
@@mirjamweibel9678This ☝️
Why didn't he push this after one night then? Why wait many years until he's about to be released?
Is there a part II ?
There’s a 2 part documentary on Netflix
my theory is that he paid someone to "get rid of her "..and he shut his phone off during the 2 hours that the "abduction "was taking place..
My theory is that he killed her and deliberately switched his phone off during the two hour or so time period he successfully disposed of her body. Would have been interesting to have some idea how many miles the Laguna was driven while in his possession. I think he specifically planned the deed for the time he would have use of someone else's vehicle because perhaps Linda wouldn't recognize him in it and a possible way to point the blame on his friend somehow later. I don't know but I tend to believe this man is guilty and thinks he did a smart enough job that he shouldn't have been found guilty.
looking forward for part 2! thanks a lot for this video. I don't believe she is alive. he might be innocent IMHO, someone may set him up.
There’s a 2 part documentary on Netflix on it
Is there no part 2 ?
There’s a 2 part documentary on Netflix
Where's part 2?
2 part documentary on Netflix
This journalist is AMAZING ! 🏆🏅 she knows perfectly well the kind of man she is talking to !
Question is how can no CCTv find him driving . Also why no mention of her new boyfriend who was lurking around the house asking people if Glynn still lived there
The boyfriends phone records also show he wasn't where he said he was on the day of her disappearance and he just so happened to be looking for Linda's car at the same time that they believe her phone was moved around a mile away from the alleyway (and returned) from phone masts evidence.
It’s just the blood in the car I don’t get
@@Xtsco11I disagree with the outcome of the case. I think the inveistavting lady closed the case when he refused the polygraph test. Very strange case, I don't think Glyn did it
Theories on the blood in the car?
Why would he still be protesting his innocence. He could get out sooner if he said he did it.
Control!
It certainly makes you wonder how many innocent people are in prison regardless of whether Glyn is innocent or not.
I have listened these crime stories believing someone was definitely guilty only to learn they were innocent and feeling very judgmental afterwards. This could be us!
@@ilovemiko You're absolutely right!
Where is part 2
1st examination by two detectives spent 40 minutes , zilch. 2nd by two forensic specialists who both spent five hours, nada and then the owner of the vehicle had to wash every single bit of the interior and saw nothing. If Glynne was taken out of the case then a very simple case can be made that she disappeared of her own volition!
Where are the police meant to have sourced a sample of her blood?
My phone also used to switch off 8n my pocket as well
Why did the police take THREE days to find the blood splatter? Why wasn't it there day one and two
He’s out of his mind. The guy is as guilty as sin. I’m so glad he ended up in jail.
If this geezer supposedly abducted this woman when she was late yet he was matriculate time keeper, so if that's so he turns up when she is supposed to be there, thus would miss her because she was late???
Ive just watched parts 1 and 2 on netflix. If i were convicted of and in prison for something i had not done i would bite your hand off if you offered me a polygraph test. I think his last minute refusal to take the polygraph was extremely suspicious. An innocent man would leap at the chance to clear his name, even if there was a small chance of this false positive. I believe he knows much more about his wife's disappearence.
You can not know that. You only know what you think you would do
And you wouldn't say, "I don't think the blood was in the car....." as rebuttal for evidence showing there was. If you are completely innocent and you know it, your reaction would be to say that there's NO WAY possible his wife's blood could be found in the boot if that car because she was never in it at all and definitely not in it while he had use of it.
Guilty as charged and convicted !
They basically learn nothing from this investigation.
Indeed
Lie detector lol. A device that even it's creator , called Frankenstein's monster. Then spent the rest of his life trying to get it out of use. Good first step🤦🏻♂️
He is lying. Why wouldn't she had just left and taken the kids. I can't believe she would not have contacted the kids. Is he claiming she didn't love the kids. Why would she have been afraid to just leave. Was it her blood in the car, if it were planted where would they have gotten it? If he was not locked up, he could have added the blood to incriminate her.
How ? Would you support yourself if this hadn’t been planned for months!!
He is soooo guilty! Justice served im afraid
His defence was so weak. Felt like excuses with him, like for example accidentally giving the police the wrong trousers and other bits. To be honest I thought he came across pretty cocky when he was talking to the woman and my mam thought the same.
Of course his guilty 😂
He did it. Razzell did it.
No he didn't. There was no evidence which proved beyond reasonable doubt
The time he was supposed to have abducted her, well she was late the police say that he only had a minute to abducted her yet he didn't know she was going to be late or by how long, wouldn't he of just got cold feet in the end and decided that that time wasn't the right time, after so many minutes that had rolled past waiting to abducted her, he would of left and decide to abduct her another day
If he was planning to grab her in the alley it would have made more sense for him to park somewhere on the route she would take near the alley, knowing she would drive passed this place. Then he would wait till she drives past up the alley to park her car. He would know that this is the ideal time to drive into the alley to wait for her to park just around the corner and walk back down the alley. He would only need to be in the alley for this time period which would take her under a minute to get to. He could have easily had his boot open and been stood against a side wall. Hits her on the head and throws her in the boot and drives off in seconds, leaving her phone on the side so it can not be traced. He may have only had a minute to actually commit the crime but he had time to sit and watch the route waiting for her to arrive. It would not have mattered if she was 5 minuets late as he could sit and wait. The timing showed he had enough time to get there even if she was on time , with a few minutes to spare. Let's be honest the longer he is sat there in a car waiting the higher the chance of him being spotted. He clearly had planned this for that day and I have no doubt that the 5 mins she was late did not cause too much of a problem.for him.
The blood was found after using new technology .
Hes not innocent ffs he did this 😂 why fight for his release at the end of his sentence lol leave detective work to the REAL DETECTIVES FFS
Think his friend could have done it?
Louise Shorter, is a very strange person, she appears to be onside with him and the next she switches.
Why did he only get 15 years?
He’s still in jail, 20 years since being convicted.
This guy looks like the BTK murderer 😮
Doesn't this sound like the mother of:5children(Gone mum)yeah,now the mistress....
👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
He did not do it but he had someone do it for him. He doesn’t look like a guy who takes a two hour walk and turns his phone off . Most likely he met up with the person who took her and finished her off.
I agree that’s a possibility. I had the same thought. Either way, he’s still guilty.
Are you all bored
Maybe IT was like Dahlmer WHO take Linda?
Umm.. "cool hair brahh"