Yu-Gi-Oh Darlings Rate Classic Magic Cards

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • We invited the delightful Yu-Gi-Oh! channel ‪@CrushCards‬ to come give their best guess as to whether these classic MTG cards are Staples or Stinkers!
    Find the cards listed in the video and buy them here: bit.ly/3XHMzFW
    _______________________________
    !Opinions expressed in this video are those of the author/video creator and not necessarily Cardmarket.
    ➥ Buy and Sell your cards: 🛒
    www.cmkt.co/v
    You can find us on:
    👾Twitch: / cardmarket_magic
    📷 Instagram: / cardmarket_magic
    📘Facebook: / cardmarketmagic
    🐦Twitter: / cardmarketmagic

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @Kirin_the_Bouncing_Unicorn
    @Kirin_the_Bouncing_Unicorn Рік тому +1749

    Alternative title: 20 minutes of Thoralf relentlessly trolling Yugioh players.

    • @markomancikas
      @markomancikas Рік тому +41

      Gotta love Thoralf, he is awesome! As a magic player since Saviors of Kamigawa, he even got me with the black sorcery to fetch a card. I saw it being played recently in historic and thought it was very good since you can assemble your combos. But I forgot it was incredibly nieche 😅

    • @Supertails224
      @Supertails224 Рік тому +4

      And we love him for it ❤

    • @eduardoaraujo1271
      @eduardoaraujo1271 Рік тому +3

      Bonus points if you typo as trolhalf.

    • @breslin90
      @breslin90 Рік тому +1

      Yes that's why I'm here

    • @skillganon606
      @skillganon606 Рік тому +2

      ​@markomancikas so tutors can be very powerful. It's just Grim Tutor is outclassed by cards like Demonic and Vampiric Tutor which cost less mana and no life.

  • @brolteon2740
    @brolteon2740 Рік тому +428

    ah yes, using every yugioh players weakness: the concept of a turn beyond turn 2

    • @yaddles-slowggles
      @yaddles-slowggles Рік тому +3

      or 1

    • @Kylora2112
      @Kylora2112 10 місяців тому +5

      I mean, most 2/3-turn Yugioh games have as much interaction as a 20-turn MTG/Hearthstone game :)

    • @VenomTNT
      @VenomTNT 9 місяців тому

      Turn 3* ok, the guy that goes first normally wins so😅🤣

    • @NerfRyze
      @NerfRyze 9 місяців тому +25

      @@Kylora2112 That's the most insane and untrue thing I have ever read

    • @Jaspersrab73
      @Jaspersrab73 5 місяців тому +6

      @@Kylora2112 that is the most giant lie I have ever heard and my parents are a different skin color then me and said I was biological

  • @SpinAroundU
    @SpinAroundU Рік тому +1100

    Grim tutor was a very nasty trap lol, it's not that bad, it's just that other tutors are insane

    • @LachyDachySachy
      @LachyDachySachy Рік тому +162

      I agree, they needed a bit more context to know that the other tutors are so much better

    • @ethanmoore7930
      @ethanmoore7930 Рік тому

      These nasty hobitsses tricked me, they stole my demonic tutors

    • @Ninjamanhammer
      @Ninjamanhammer Рік тому +60

      There aren't a lot of formats where much better tutors are legal so calling it a stinker seems fair.

    • @dmdearing
      @dmdearing Рік тому +127

      Grim tutor was just in standard and saw no real play and is legal in basically every other format after it got its reprinting but isn't really played anywhere else either. So by that metric it's a stinker in 60 card formats.
      In commander it's definitely playable but I don't think that's where Thoralfs mind is at with this series

    • @Ninjamanhammer
      @Ninjamanhammer Рік тому +8

      @@dmdearing Also compitive commander isn't playing it anymore.

  • @Steamboat2016
    @Steamboat2016 Рік тому +812

    This was evil lol you gave them every card that's a noob trap and it's beautiful

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +82

      We have been baited but I wanted nothing less 🤣🤣 this was so much fun tbh!

    • @blueishgreen76
      @blueishgreen76 Рік тому +88

      I'd have to agree giving someone that's never seen Vampiric Tutor or Demonic Tutor a nerfed-for-standard tutor card is pure evil.

    • @Steamboat2016
      @Steamboat2016 Рік тому +33

      @@blueishgreen76 I kept waiting for him to say that grim tutor has multiple strictly better cards

    • @PaulGaither
      @PaulGaither Рік тому +20

      Except Grim tutor isn't stinkr. it is (was ) a staple 4x in Grim Long, hence the name (Long is the last name of the deck's creator), in Vintage. A Mind's Desire storm deck. it is also fantastic in cEDH and regular EDH. the fact that it is a "stinker" in Modern and Legacy is lss about the card itself and more about how INSANE power creep has gotten over the last 5+ years. It would have been unthinkable to have this in Modern 8+ years ago. The card itself isn't bad, the game design and power creep has just gotten out of control.

    • @blueishgreen76
      @blueishgreen76 Рік тому +14

      @@PaulGaither By the standards they use for "Staple" vs. "stinker," the 2021 reprint was largely a stinker. A lot of people would have hoped it was a sufficient improvement over diabolic tutor to see more play, but it never materialized. (If not for the London mulligan, it might have been a modern staple). Being irrelevant in modern, semi-relevant in Vintage, and being the 5th or 6th best black tutor card for inclusion in a commander deck really only raises it to the level of Meh.

  • @CrushCards
    @CrushCards Рік тому +815

    This was an emotional rollercoaster and i need REDEMPTION 🤣 seriously, this is one of the most fun videos we’ve ever done so if y’all would like round 2 electric boogaloo, we’re here for you, team! 💕 thank you for laughing with (and at) us! ❤️

    • @Thestar17x
      @Thestar17x Рік тому +8

      The reason why yugioh is kinda like magic is because,yugioh started off as a magic parody

    • @brianzabawa3727
      @brianzabawa3727 Рік тому

      Get a phone q friend next time

    • @Rene9adeSU
      @Rene9adeSU Рік тому +6

      The thing about fires of Invention is, you can abuse it in a deck called "Taking turns" which contains Fires, card draw spells and tons of extra turn spells so when you get a fires down, it will always be your turn and never your opponents turn again.

    • @WafflesInTheRain
      @WafflesInTheRain Рік тому +3

      Loved the energy from both of you guys this episode!

    • @FartRainbows
      @FartRainbows Рік тому +4

      electric boogaloo lesgo!

  • @MakeVarahHappen
    @MakeVarahHappen Рік тому +170

    I love how every version of this series ends with the outsider learning too much to be tricked so the host has to find a new one, like a parasite leaping from victim to victim.

  • @YoonnsAvec2N
    @YoonnsAvec2N Рік тому +407

    Grim Tutor was an evil pick.

    • @Samst0n
      @Samst0n Рік тому +61

      The question they could have asked to reveal that it wasn’t a staple would be “is this effect available at a cheaper cost”. But yeah with a YGO mindset it looks like a slam dunk staple.

    • @felicen93
      @felicen93 Рік тому +4

      I don't know, I play Yu-Gi-Oh and have basically no knowledge of the meta game but still felt like even the smallest MTG experience could have helped you understand the card is not good

    • @Tomwithnonumbers
      @Tomwithnonumbers Рік тому +104

      ​@@felicen93 Grim tutor isn't really a bad card though, it's just beaten out by even more busted versions of the same effect.

    • @Ninjamanhammer
      @Ninjamanhammer Рік тому +17

      @@Tomwithnonumbers The more busted cards are banned basically everywhere and Grim Tutor still isn't seeing play.

    • @alygatornado
      @alygatornado Рік тому +14

      Yeah, I was like, "Grim Tutor is tricky in a vacuum, since there are so many better tutors. It's not Diabolic Tutor bad, but I definitely play Dimir House Guard in my commander decks..."

  • @OsvaldoChannel1
    @OsvaldoChannel1 Рік тому +525

    "can your opponents oneshot you?"
    "no, usually the stats match the cost"
    Hammertime and Dark Depths have joined the chat

    • @michaelsinnreich6626
      @michaelsinnreich6626 Рік тому +28

      It's almost like there is a reason force of will was created.

    • @theNightDice
      @theNightDice Рік тому +16

      I mean, I guess you could specify that usually stats match the cost *if played fairly.

    • @nvvv_
      @nvvv_ Рік тому +13

      Keyword is "usually".

    • @Nalianna
      @Nalianna Рік тому +6

      "Usually". That's a word that describes decks that suck. Decks that don't suck... avoid "usually". both in terms of "can one shot you", or "pay fair prices for their spells" (looking at you, reanimator)

    • @daolothe
      @daolothe Рік тому +24

      Colossus Hammer costs 9 mana for a 10/10. Dark Depths is 30 mana for a 20/20.
      The cards aren’t overstatted by themselves, you have to combo them with something in order to break parity.

  • @TaisxD
    @TaisxD Рік тому +253

    It's seriously impossible for me to look at Thoralf without smiling. That passion for the game is amazing. The guests were pretty cool too.

  • @katkitty3274
    @katkitty3274 Рік тому +159

    As a commander player I was bamboozled with the grim tutor being a stinker because I thought it was really good, then I remembered about the formats that don't take hours to finish a game

    • @MrReaperHand
      @MrReaperHand Рік тому +16

      This whole series is not looking at cards for commander. This is normal magic formats that are 1v1 and non-singleton. Grim tutor definitely sucks if you can have 4 diabolic. There are plenty of cards from this series that are staples in commander, but not other formats and vice versa with stinkers when they are staples in others. This channel doesn't focus, or do much, with commander as there is a ton of other channels that do.

    • @Narrimander
      @Narrimander Рік тому +21

      @@MrReaperHand "Staple or Stinker" as a show doesn't really work in the context of Commander because most cards can be argued to be staples in Commander --- in the right deck.
      As a primarily EDH player watching this show, I have to turn off the part of my brain that assesses the power/viability of cards in the context of EDH, because every single card they've shown across every episode has a deck/commander/archetype that will perform well, and perform better by using that card.
      Grim Tutor is a staple in EDH because even though it's worse than Vampiric and Demonic, by the nature of being singleton, it's the third best version of that effect. It's the de facto third copy of "Generic Tutor".

    • @MrReaperHand
      @MrReaperHand Рік тому +4

      @@Narrimander Yes...I have to do that too. However, everything you said I kinda did as well with less articulation.

    • @agustinEduardoLopez
      @agustinEduardoLopez Рік тому +4

      It happens all the time. I think "hey that card is cool", and then remember there are a lot of other formats that allows you to have more copies of the same card Xd

    • @ViXoZuDo
      @ViXoZuDo 10 місяців тому +1

      Even in EDH is not a "great" card... cEDH is the "meta" of EDH and it only see play in some lists (like krrik)... Remember that casual EDH is not optimized like any other 60 cards format.

  • @joeldykman7591
    @joeldykman7591 Рік тому +70

    What wouldve been evil is having vampiric tutor right after grim tutor. Having to explain that vamp is broken even though it has an even greater downside would be hilarious.

  • @Eifuh
    @Eifuh Рік тому +221

    The more I think about it the more I realize that Fires just turns the game into Yugioh

    • @najawin8348
      @najawin8348 Рік тому +36

      As mbt said, yugioh is mtg if every deck was storm past in flames.

    • @SmashPortal
      @SmashPortal Рік тому

      ​@@najawin8348
      Storm + Past in Flames is a nonbo in Magic lol

    • @najawin8348
      @najawin8348 Рік тому +13

      @@SmashPortal No? It's very much a deck people play in Modern. (Well. Did play. It's been powercrept.)

    • @herbert164
      @herbert164 Рік тому +5

      @@SmashPortal pretty sure past in flames sees legacy storm play. i think it is the only red card in the deck.

  • @redram9
    @redram9 Рік тому +112

    I loved the discussion around Faithless Looting and Bryan suggesting that maybe Red doesn't get to play in it's graveyard - which is pretty much doesn't get to do, a few cards aside. But it being only one Red pip means that colors that can take advantage of their yard make great use of Faithless looting

    • @adoenlunnae872
      @adoenlunnae872 Рік тому +12

      And also one of the big self-discard archetypes has red in it (madness)

    • @1234millerz
      @1234millerz Рік тому +21

      I don't know why they keep saying FL is like Pot of Greed when it's literally Graceful Charity drawing one less.

    • @Murkglow
      @Murkglow Рік тому +11

      I mean, Phoenixes, Past in Flames, Goblin Wielder/Trash for Treasure, ect... I'd argue Red does as much/more with its graveyard than any color outside of Black. If you include Madness as "graveyard things" (they are going to the graveyard) then it certainly gets the number two spot after Black IMO. Blue would be third just on the back of Snapcaster effects followed by Green with the occasional Regrowths. White takes up the rear for me just because their creature/enchantment/artifact resurrection effects tend to be played/printed less often (usually black/red do creature/artifact reanimation better so White only really stands out in enchantments).

    • @xsomeNOOBx
      @xsomeNOOBx Рік тому +4

      Red has madness and flashback!! Not to mention most decks aren't mono, meaning reds specific graveyard capabilities don't matter.

    • @thomasfplm
      @thomasfplm Рік тому +1

      I think that it didn't come to them that you can use more than one colour.

  • @randommaster06
    @randommaster06 Рік тому +63

    It was very generous of Nassif to lend his hat out for this video.

  • @theremix54
    @theremix54 Рік тому +528

    "I feel like I just read a whole bunch of words that didnt mean much"
    Ill never understand why Yu-Gi-Oh players are always overwhelmed by MTG text, its one of the more simple games in its wording, YuGiOh is the game where half the cards are novels.

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +151

      Honestly I think that’s what throws us LOL, it’s the fact that it is truly simplified and we’re used to NOVELS on card effects 🤣🤣 it’s like, we see something simplified and we’re like ‘is this bait?’ 🤣 I envy the fact that y’all have simpler texts sometimes tbh. It’s all love! 🤣💞

    • @gujianing51
      @gujianing51 Рік тому +43

      I think a lot of the times effects on yugioh cards could be shortened to a generic class of effects including: search, mill, special summon, negate, removal ect. Most card effects are just templating on different archetypes.

    • @kkahakusan5591
      @kkahakusan5591 Рік тому +57

      Text and word recognition is a thing; us reading "You can only activate the second effect of"this card" once per turn" becomes a quick sentence we kind of skip ahead, because we are used to it's lengthy formatting 👀
      TL;DR: It isn't the landscape, it's the unexplored that's overwhelming.

    • @sylvainsanesti3499
      @sylvainsanesti3499 Рік тому +29

      Well she just doesn't know what the mtg keywords mean, that's all. And Magic have way more keywords than any other card game

    • @lonthy1537
      @lonthy1537 Рік тому +47

      The thing is that MTG relies a lot on keywords to convey the effects of it's cards, so while it's really easy to understand a MTG card once you know the game a little bit, someone who's never played won't know what "black", "faerie", "rogue", "flying" etc. mean at first glance.

  • @joshuam4880
    @joshuam4880 Рік тому +24

    A big part of why bitter blossom is good that they didn't mention is that the tokens have flying, which is important because in most games the tokens will do a lot of damage and not get invalidated by a 1/2 creature without flying.

    • @Powersd451
      @Powersd451 Рік тому +2

      Yes, the life cost is more than negated by the fact it can often directly attack the enemy, and otherwise it can block enemy fliers.

  • @Ohmargod
    @Ohmargod Рік тому +14

    It's brilliant to invite 2 people or a couple to this series as they fumbled so hard discussing with each other.
    Thoralf even told them that he's giving them any context that they ask for, but they were so absorbed with their own discussion that they forgot all about him.
    Well played.

  • @victhefoxygamer
    @victhefoxygamer Рік тому +85

    Another aspect of Magic that is different, there's no limit on how much can be on board. Where as in yugioh you have five zones for monsters and five for spell/trap token generation is insane in magic, cause as long as you have life, you get the faeries, don't have to worry about space in that regard

    • @Amascut
      @Amascut Рік тому +17

      Definitely - was surprised this wasn’t mentioned! Of course getting a dinky little 1/1 seems bad to the YuGiOh player! It takes up a whole slot on the board and you can’t afford that in the game these days! That’s of course not an issue in Magic and just grows your board ever larger.

    • @VORTEX___
      @VORTEX___ Рік тому +5

      @@Amascut also if you have hundred small guys in magic you can attack and win. in yugioh, as long as there is a single bigger guy on your opponents field, you aren't getting through at all.

    • @hi-i-am-atan
      @hi-i-am-atan Рік тому +2

      @@VORTEX___ also, a hundred small guys can actually be used defensively or offensively as needed. meanwhile in ygo, if you tried to use a 400 atk direct attacker to chip away at your opponent's life, you've basically just given them a direct route to your _own_ lp that they can exploit regardless of the giant dragon on your field that they can't attack over

  • @Razomka
    @Razomka Рік тому +39

    Love Stinker VS Staple.
    Logan and Byran were great guests. Good energy around them.

  • @chimpmasterflex
    @chimpmasterflex Рік тому +26

    Seeing Thoralf enjoy himself so much was definitely the highlight of this episode.

  • @ulyssessanchez2328
    @ulyssessanchez2328 Рік тому +48

    "It Draws 2- Not 12...so it's like not good"
    I cannot explain how accurate that feels😭

  • @Cameron-ds9xs
    @Cameron-ds9xs Рік тому +10

    Their logic got way better as the episode went on. Also those were tough ones to judge compared to some of the other episodes, very fun.

  • @ahmadchehade1645
    @ahmadchehade1645 Рік тому +49

    love the back and forth between all 3, would love to see them on again either with more staple or stinker, or maybe in a "Yugioh Players given a magic decks and try to face each other" series

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +10

      Oh that sounds SO FUN ✨ absolutely down to come back!!

    • @valvadis2360
      @valvadis2360 Рік тому +1

      That sounds cool!

  • @faucetrememberly2399
    @faucetrememberly2399 Рік тому +13

    I’ve been having a miserable day of chronic pain but Thoralf never ceases to make me feel happy. Thank you Cardmarket!

  • @Ezullof
    @Ezullof Рік тому +53

    8:40 I don't know much about Yu-Gi-Oh, but what I know is that it plays really fast. Waiting for 4 turns before getting the good effect does sound very bad from a Yu Gi Oh perspective too.

    • @ardynamberglow3124
      @ardynamberglow3124 Рік тому +10

      Yeah, though TBF YGO matches don't last past 2 turns, while Magic can usually go to turn 7 and beyond.

    • @lukewest7216
      @lukewest7216 Рік тому +34

      I'm not sure if they got tipped off to what tapping a card does

    • @TheJannis1994
      @TheJannis1994 Рік тому +19

      Think they didn't ask about tapping the card

    • @DragoSmash
      @DragoSmash Рік тому +3

      i play both, and if that card existed in YGO it would be very bad, as an artifact it would be closely to a continuous spell card, which needing to be face-up for 4 turns just makes it a sitting duck for the myriad of removal that exists in the game, starting with things as easy to come by and popular as Knightmare Phoenix

    • @Xios_Angelis
      @Xios_Angelis 7 місяців тому

      I can definitely see decks where it is highly valuable though. Like Atraxa. Lmao Proliferate go brrrrt

  • @matthewkeeling886
    @matthewkeeling886 Рік тому +29

    I might go on a limb here and suggest Lightning Bolt as a pick for the next one of these... the differences between the games could lead to some fun discussion and confusion. Really fun episode!

    • @Pedun42
      @Pedun42 Рік тому +1

      Id go further and say they should use chain lightning instead

    • @matthewkeeling886
      @matthewkeeling886 Рік тому +5

      @@Pedun42 Ooh... didn't think of that one, though, given WoTC's (incorrect) insistence on Bolt being overpowered I would prefer it. For a softball perhaps one of the Lava Axe variants being shown later in the same group as either.

  • @alecolson8360
    @alecolson8360 Рік тому +16

    This one is glorious. The staple or stinker balance is getting pretty competitive

  • @SomeOfTheJuice
    @SomeOfTheJuice Рік тому +8

    Fires was definitely a card where, when I first saw it I was like "eh, only two spells and only on your turn? That's so limiting..."
    Then I played against it and I realized "holy shit, how wrong I was. Two spells on each of your turns is more than enough."

    • @shadowless2960
      @shadowless2960 Рік тому +1

      Yeah I have it in my Zirda fire-breathing deck, it DEMOLISHES

    • @Kylora2112
      @Kylora2112 10 місяців тому +1

      It's a MTG card that basically lets you play Yugioh (because most Yugioh effects are either sorcery speed or just a Counterspell).

  • @jayd0lin214
    @jayd0lin214 Рік тому +5

    I love watching these as a YuGiOh and Magic player haha its pretty interesting how the gameplay is so different, yet somehow really similar at the same time

  • @laurelkeeper
    @laurelkeeper Рік тому +18

    Great video! The guests were delightful and I'd love to see them come back for another episode!

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +4

      Heck yeah!! 😤✨ very down to come back, this was honestly one of the most fun videos we’ve ever been a part of! ❤️

  • @scanvil3766
    @scanvil3766 Рік тому +5

    i started watching some of the videos on this channel 2 weeks ago. started playing magic 3 days ago and it's fun to see, how much better i understand the values of the cards now. i had no idea of any rulings 2 weeks ago

    • @JackgarPrime
      @JackgarPrime Рік тому

      Once you understand the basics of the differences between the games, you can very quickly understand the values in comparison.

  • @muggyyy
    @muggyyy Рік тому +1

    These two had to be the most mind numbing guests to date

  • @ThankYouForTheVideos
    @ThankYouForTheVideos Рік тому +4

    Great episode! I'd love to see them back!! It was fun to see how they would get on the right path and then talk themselves out of it , I feel like with a better understanding of MTG they would have nailed it!

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +2

      Guess we gotta come back!! 💕💕

  • @xxxxSylphxxxx
    @xxxxSylphxxxx Рік тому +2

    Those 2 Yu-gi-oh players are so likeable! Thanks for the video, it was so uplifting!

  • @khengar5517
    @khengar5517 Рік тому +10

    I think seeing these 2 playing some starter decks against each other where toralf explains stuff would be hella funny

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +3

      OMg that would be HILARIOUS IM SO DOWN

  • @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai
    @Crunchatize_Me_Senpai Рік тому +5

    I’m iffy on calling a card that’s really good in one specific deck but not any other deck (ie, Fires of Invention) a “staple”. The existence of niche powerhouse cards does complicate the idea of this series. Still, super fun video, great guests and great hosts! I thoroughly enjoyed this.

    • @Kylora2112
      @Kylora2112 10 місяців тому

      I would think of "staple" as both "core card of a specific competitive meta deck" as well as "generically good support card."

  • @su0tin731
    @su0tin731 Рік тому +7

    For a moment I thought you were going to grade Fires of Invention a stinker, and I was thinking about all the fun I had with it in Pioneer. It was so incredible to have on the battlefield, and using the mana for activated abilities.
    Also, I'd say Grim Tutor and Grimoire of the Dead are very playable in Commander, although the Grimoire feels more casual play oriented.

    • @YourAdHere4
      @YourAdHere4 Рік тому +4

      I can’t imagine a Grimoire at 3 would survive a rotation at an edh table lol

    • @su0tin731
      @su0tin731 Рік тому

      @@YourAdHere4 Yeah, that's why I pointed the casual approach, but even then It'd be a stretch. My friends don't bring that much removal, so It could go off sometimes.

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali Рік тому

      Grim Tutor was a staple in 60-card Eternal formats where Black Lotus, Lion's Eye Diamond, Dark Ritual, Cabal Ritual, and/or Yawgmoth's Will are legal. It's just combo decks in Legacy and Vintage aren't killing people with Tendrils of Agony as often as they are with Thassa's Oracle and Monastery Mentor.
      For Grim Long, Grim Tutor was essentially a free spell to drive up your storm count where Vampiric Tutor, Imperial Seal, and Demonic Tutor were banned/restricted.

    • @herbert164
      @herbert164 Рік тому

      @@YourAdHere4 you would need unwinding clock or counter doubler.

    • @naphackDT
      @naphackDT Рік тому +2

      The problem with grimoire isn't just that it's slow.
      It also has too many potential counters. It's value depends entirely on being able to activate it multiple times, so if an opponent sticks a pithing needle on it, it's a dead piece of cardboard. You obviously also die to artifact removal and graveyard hate, both of which are very common and if you play it straight, you give your opponent a lot of time to find those cards.
      Lastly, there is the dedicated artifact untap shell... which probably won't have a high density of big creatures, so you are relying on your opponent to have a specific kind of deck? Just terrible.

  • @zurreal8087
    @zurreal8087 Рік тому +9

    I’m surprised that they didn’t get the second one seeing as how Destiny Board exists in Yugioh.

  • @outputcoupler7819
    @outputcoupler7819 Рік тому +43

    Grim Tutor is at least fine as part of a tutor package in EDH decks that _really_ need to rip certain cards to win. I mean, it's the second worst tutor you could draw, but it's playable.

    • @akorthouwer
      @akorthouwer Рік тому +10

      Hmm no it's not there are like 12 better tutors in edh in the color black

    • @blueishgreen76
      @blueishgreen76 Рік тому +9

      It's fair to list it as a stinker, even if it has a niche use. What's not fair is giving it to someone to grade that doesn't know about any of the better tutor cards around.

    • @dif4797
      @dif4797 Рік тому +9

      @@blueishgreen76 That‘s the point xD.

    • @Graatand
      @Graatand Рік тому +3

      @@blueishgreen76 Yeah, I feel Thoralf could have at least mentioned that if you remove 1 black mana and 3 life from Grim Tutor’s cost, then the card is literally broken and banned everywhere.

    • @zhilothebest
      @zhilothebest Рік тому +4

      Wait what? I would definitely say they are many worse tutors than Grim, especially if you need to tutor fast for the combo.

  • @Charwhale
    @Charwhale Рік тому +1

    great collaboration, love the people at crush cards and this was the perfect video to have them on! would love to see them try again!

  • @andreww479
    @andreww479 Рік тому +4

    Every time Adam does one of these videos he is also super keen to discard and graveyard decks so i was so ready for them to see Faithless Looting and think it would be really strong since it puts cards into graveyard and then they just didn't and i was a little surprised.

    • @nekrataali
      @nekrataali Рік тому +1

      I really want to see non-MtG players (hell, non-Legacy/Odyssey block players) react to Breakthrough.

  • @PawzBrownMTG
    @PawzBrownMTG Рік тому +1

    This was fun please do more of these. KEEP STAYING PAWZITIVE Y'ALL

  • @ChronoMoogle
    @ChronoMoogle Рік тому +10

    The explanation as of why Grim Tutor is not a Staple could have been better, otherwise great episode!

    • @anthonystaton3740
      @anthonystaton3740 Рік тому +3

      Except Grim Tutor is a staple in multiple combo decks.

    • @MrReaperHand
      @MrReaperHand Рік тому +3

      ​@@anthonystaton3740 And singleton formats like commander where you can only have one of each tutor.
      This series is from one v one and non singleton lens only. Some of these cards would not be a staple or stinker in commander. Fires of invention would definitely hurt more than help in commander simply because of multi-player format two spells 3 opponents is brutal.

    • @ich3730
      @ich3730 Рік тому

      @@anthonystaton3740 Its really not lul.

    • @Choadis
      @Choadis Рік тому

      ​@MrReaperHand commander is not a real format, grim will not see play in real magic pretty much ever

    • @lugialover09
      @lugialover09 5 місяців тому

      @@Choadis Commander is the most played format in Magic. Saying it's not a real format or not real Magic is just ridiculous. They literally print cards specifically for it because it's just that popular.

  • @NiiRubra
    @NiiRubra Рік тому +1

    This was a hilarious episode of Staple or Stinker! And wow, you guys picked such mean cards for them lol.

  • @thatstranger6114
    @thatstranger6114 Рік тому +20

    To be fair, Grim Tutor is certainly a staple for people that can't justify the cost of Vampiric or Demonic Tutors.

    • @joshuagriffith9191
      @joshuagriffith9191 Рік тому +1

      Vamp and demonic tutor are only legal (restricted) in Vintage anymore in any constructed format and were completely broken historically and now as a vintage player. Grim tutor is legal in everything and is not really good enough to take advantage of tutoring.
      That being said if you only play commander, vamp tutor is $30 after the reprint. Great time to pick it up. And demonic tutor is about $45 so fairly cheap as powerful magic cards go.

    • @thatstranger6114
      @thatstranger6114 Рік тому

      @@joshuagriffith9191 that's still a lot to spend on a single card for some people.

    • @joshuagriffith9191
      @joshuagriffith9191 Рік тому

      @@thatstranger6114 I agree. It is something that just had to be accepted if you want to play magic buddy. Or just proxy it.

    • @Yangus92
      @Yangus92 4 місяці тому

      Oooooh it’s a stapoor

  • @andrewp6738
    @andrewp6738 Рік тому +1

    I don’t have any interest or knowledge of YuGiOh but I always watch this series. Super fun to see people reason about these cards

  • @ShinjiGetsGrounded
    @ShinjiGetsGrounded Рік тому +4

    Grim Tutor is a bit harsh. Stinkers should be those bulk rares/mythics that nobody ever plays in constructed.

    • @CardmarketMagic
      @CardmarketMagic  Рік тому +1

      No one plays grimoir of the dead in 1v1 constructed, it's much too slow :)

  • @brendanmckenna7613
    @brendanmckenna7613 Рік тому

    Ive watched a lot of these videos, and I think this is by far the most entertaining. You should invite more than one person onto the show at a time more often!

  • @SwedeRacerDC
    @SwedeRacerDC Рік тому +3

    I still really like Grimoire of the Dead. I think it's underrated, in commander specifically. Do the top ability once, untap it and proliferate twice. Especially with Unwinding Clock or clock of omens and/or in a Yawgmoth deck (or an Atraxa deck).

  • @w33b_potato
    @w33b_potato Рік тому +2

    This series is soo good! Definitely need more of these!

  • @KaoruMzk
    @KaoruMzk Рік тому +3

    Showing Grim Tutor to a Yugioh player is the most evilest thing you could have done on this show. I loved it 😂

  • @walls_of_skulls6061
    @walls_of_skulls6061 Рік тому

    This is my favorite type of video! It's so rare to see and I love it when these pop up.

  • @nathanwilkins6107
    @nathanwilkins6107 Рік тому +7

    I wish they’d do a little more “translation” for the yu gi oh players. For example-
    Bitterblossom is a continuous spell with “during your standby phase you lose 400 life and create a creature token with 400 attack and 400 defense”

    • @ninfrosty2093
      @ninfrosty2093 Рік тому +3

      Translation is just very hard between the two games in general. Yes there are some things that carry over, but differences like how battling works, and the yugioh extra deck drastically changes how you play the two games.
      Like in yugioh, a monster with small stats, and no relevant effect is almost useless. Their biggest use being to using them to make monsters from the extra deck. Otherwise, a monster with 400 attack and defense is literally just useless.

    • @mynt4033
      @mynt4033 Рік тому +3

      Although, low stat creatures are liabilities in ygo, it would be really bad in the context.

    • @matthewkeeling886
      @matthewkeeling886 Рік тому +2

      @@mynt4033 Well, it would be tribute/synchro/link fodder once per turn, every turn after the turn it was played... with no other restrictions. It would probably also be a direct attacker in YGO to translate the Flying, for whatever that is worth.

    • @chenkaixiang2455
      @chenkaixiang2455 Рік тому

      2:31 he basically says what u said tho

    • @Jcbryant123
      @Jcbryant123 Рік тому

      @@ninfrosty2093 if they added that it creates a Tuner every turn, then it would probably make a lot more sense

  • @Bull_1112
    @Bull_1112 Рік тому

    Such a fantastic episode! The dynamic between everyone was amazing. Hope to see them do something like this again

  • @TheOtherOlesen
    @TheOtherOlesen Рік тому +16

    I think for Grim Tutor, it would’ve been good to explain that there are other cards that do the same thing for cheaper and at instant speed, which helps it be a stinker more than a staple because they were on the right track that tutoring is good and life is a resource, unfortunately there are just better cards that do the same thing

    • @anthonystaton3740
      @anthonystaton3740 Рік тому +1

      Even with demonic and vampiric tutor, it's still a staple in combo decks. I don't know a single person who didnt add it to their combo deck so they have more options to tutor for their pieces. Staple for sure.

    • @TheOtherOlesen
      @TheOtherOlesen Рік тому +1

      @@anthonystaton3740 What format is your reference here though?

    • @anthonystaton3740
      @anthonystaton3740 Рік тому

      @@TheOtherOlesen It's used in legacy reanimator, I know it's in multiple modern decks. There Is no format not running grim tutor dude what do you mean

    • @TheOtherOlesen
      @TheOtherOlesen Рік тому

      @@anthonystaton3740 No need to be defensive, I was just asking for clarifying examples

    • @anthonystaton3740
      @anthonystaton3740 Рік тому

      @@TheOtherOlesen I'm asking what do you mean what format? Any format I guess is the answer?

  • @Vesperios2350
    @Vesperios2350 Рік тому +1

    3:06 LOL I love how he dies laughing when she says "every magic card is a great card" xD

  • @brokensprites
    @brokensprites Рік тому +6

    They did really well and their thought process was spot on. Very entertaining as well. Great series, thanks for bringing it back.

    • @CrushCards
      @CrushCards Рік тому +1

      💕💞 thank you all for enjoying our chaotic selves! Cardmarket gang best gang ✨

    • @brokensprites
      @brokensprites Рік тому

      @@CrushCards you're welcome and thank you for the reply. Hopefully we see a round 2. Have a wonderful day. 😎

  • @cooldes4593
    @cooldes4593 Рік тому +2

    I play magic and i didnt know if he was gonna have fires of invention listed as a staple or stinker

  • @DerpHerper
    @DerpHerper Рік тому +47

    You gotta go back and tell them that Grim Tutor is absolutely a defining card in CEDH. Give them the consolation prize.

    • @heath1948
      @heath1948 Рік тому +8

      These guys generally play modern and other things not edh or cedh. So the value to commander or competitive commander is not what they’re looking at.

    • @skyguytomas9615
      @skyguytomas9615 Рік тому +9

      I can't think of a cedh deck that would play it other that Krrik.

    • @heath1948
      @heath1948 Рік тому

      @@skyguytomas9615 there are some that have a lot of life gain that would be able for that to work. I know a lot of casual med decks it play it

    • @MarinaMouseVT
      @MarinaMouseVT Рік тому +4

      I keep getting these ones wrong because I only play comander

    • @shauntoochaos235
      @shauntoochaos235 Рік тому +3

      I feel like we need a statement at the beginning for formats and time. Bitter blossom isn't a good in any format its legal in and depending on what the power level of standard is it might be to weak there too.

  • @level20art50
    @level20art50 Рік тому +1

    I think this is a part where my context as a Commander player is different from his context as a Standard or Modern or other format player. Because like, Grim Tutor is insane in Commander. Before it got reprinted in M21, it was over $300. It is an insane card. It just takes the much more grindy, combo-heavy format that is Commander to make it worth playing.

    • @Varatrix
      @Varatrix Рік тому

      Yeah he is like solely on Standard and Modern so his opinion is a bit infuriating sometimes.

  • @TomGalonska
    @TomGalonska Рік тому +3

    Choosing Grim Tutor was diabolic! There are a lot of Magic players who would get that one wrong. :D

    • @pinkfluffyant6335
      @pinkfluffyant6335 Рік тому +3

      As a long-term magic player, I still thought Grimm Tutor was good. To be fair I know it sucks I competitive, but In casual it's quite nice

    • @WarbossFraka
      @WarbossFraka Рік тому

      ​@@pinkfluffyant6335The effects fine and not exactly awful. But the tempo hit of sorcery speed 3cmc and bolting your own face is painful.

  • @loafy2
    @loafy2 Рік тому +1

    Great video. All the cards were really good choices and the guests had fantastic chemistry

  • @friendly115
    @friendly115 Рік тому +4

    He really said Grim tutor is a Stinker with a straight face. 💀💀💀

    • @anthonystaton3740
      @anthonystaton3740 Рік тому +1

      BRO THATS WHAT IM SAYING
      Just straight lied to thier faces.

    • @OtherSideLLC
      @OtherSideLLC Рік тому

      Well it is in any 60 cars format, or really anything competitive

    • @friendly115
      @friendly115 Рік тому

      @@OtherSideLLC ?xd

    • @OtherSideLLC
      @OtherSideLLC Рік тому

      @@friendly115 Grim Tutor isn't a good card in any 60 card format. it isn't currently played in pioneer, it was in a bad legacy deck (Ad Nause Tendrils), a bad modern deck (twiddle storm), and a few fringe vintage decks. Even if you look at Standard when it was legal (which is why bitter blossom is included since it was in 6 of the top 8 decks in worlds in 2008) it was in none of the worlds decks in 2021 or 2022.
      I see it in a few cEDH decks but honestly I don't view cEDH as all that competitive.

    • @friendly115
      @friendly115 Рік тому

      @@OtherSideLLC when grim tutor was legal in standard it was on every deck, it isnt popular in other formats because there are better tutors that doesnt mean its a bad card

  • @OscarBrewer
    @OscarBrewer Рік тому +1

    "But what if Red is the archetype that doesn't have cards in the GY? What if it's Green?" Loved that. 🤣

  • @maurizioraffreddato5429
    @maurizioraffreddato5429 Рік тому +4

    this was by far the best episode: bryan and logan are super lovely, but also the yugioh mindset used to understand the cards here really played a pivotal role, against crush cards unfortunately. the cards choice was on point, 'cos bait so hard their reasoning, therefore it was hella fun see them struggling ahah. love ya crush card, avramax and shu-raig best daddies

  • @clovergannon
    @clovergannon Рік тому +1

    Telling them Grim Tutor is a stinker, but then not explaining the existence of every other better tutor out there feels like you did them dirty lol.

  • @janMelantu
    @janMelantu Рік тому +3

    Grim Tutor: the worst tutor you’re still willing to play. It’s certainly a staple in competitive highlander formats, and I think it saw play in standard, but yeah, no reason to play it in Modern or Legacy.

  • @phillytothej4001
    @phillytothej4001 Рік тому +2

    Die hard Crush Cards fan for life. Please do the flip side of this video so Logan can talk about Thunder Dragon Colossus

  • @KingToll
    @KingToll Рік тому +23

    Calling Bitterblossom a staple? *Nikachu has entered the chat*

    • @cantfeelmyfacehelp7375
      @cantfeelmyfacehelp7375 Рік тому +17

      Ask him to leave pls

    • @jorgemendieta8085
      @jorgemendieta8085 Рік тому +2

      the staple/stinker denomination is given to cards that see o don't see play in a format, bitterblossom was a card that saw a lot of play in standard. Nikachu talks about it in modern, and there it sucks.

    • @blueishgreen76
      @blueishgreen76 Рік тому

      @@jorgemendieta8085 They actually seem to focus on modern more than standard. Bitterblosem was actually banned for a few years in modern. It's marginal now, but that's more because people actually adjust how they build decks to deal with 1/1 token generators.

  • @Surg-265
    @Surg-265 6 місяців тому +1

    For some reason, Thoralf reminds me of a coconut shrimp.
    I have no idea why.

    • @Surg-265
      @Surg-265 6 місяців тому +1

      Qwertyuiop here, 12 days later. Thoralf still reminds me of coconut shrimp.

    • @santiagovelez3843
      @santiagovelez3843 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Surg-265 mondongo

  • @InsolentCrow
    @InsolentCrow Рік тому +7

    Faithless Looting is literally banned in the Modern format. If that doesn't qualify as a staple, I don't know what does! Great example!

    • @Samst0n
      @Samst0n Рік тому +1

      Did you keep watching the video? He did the “unfortunately” as a joke to mess with them.

    • @InsolentCrow
      @InsolentCrow Рік тому

      @@Samst0n Maybe I wasn't clear, what I meant was that it was a great example of a staple but I can see why I wasn't too clear.

  • @Alakarin
    @Alakarin Рік тому

    Loved this. So funny and inciteful to see. The cards were really tricky this time I think, but that added to the hilarity.

  • @sheriffmo1330
    @sheriffmo1330 Рік тому +4

    Grim Tutor. The 70$ stinker

    • @fosterdawson7339
      @fosterdawson7339 Рік тому +1

      after the reprint its only about $15 fortunately

    • @CardmarketMagic
      @CardmarketMagic  Рік тому +1

      Card quality cannot be rated by price. There are tons of terrible cards that are very expensive. The main factor is rarity. But we also purposely try to use cards that are traps for beginner players. Grim tutor is a great example. Players would generally win more games of 1v1 if they took it out of their decks, but casual players still fall for the trap and buy it, inflating its price

  • @Thousandeyes85
    @Thousandeyes85 Рік тому

    Very fun episode. The more they get wrong only enhances the contrast and individuality of the two card games

  • @itsRekky
    @itsRekky Рік тому +4

    Hot take, the guests are terrible this episode.

  • @DodWilEcton
    @DodWilEcton Рік тому +1

    One of the biggest differences between these two games, which I don’t think gets mentioned enough, is that in yu-gi-oh you have to attack your opponents’ creatures if they have them, and overflow damage goes to the player (I know I’m oversimplifying), whereas in magic you just declare creatures are attacking and it’s up to the defending player to block if they can and want to. It seems minor, but it changes the dynamic dramatically.

  • @Gaming_Duck
    @Gaming_Duck Рік тому +9

    Day 2 of asking for an episode in German so my German teacher can show it in class

    • @drsherifff
      @drsherifff Рік тому +2

      Based

    • @cdevans97
      @cdevans97 Рік тому

      what do you mean? they're speaking fluent german

  • @prinnyEXE
    @prinnyEXE Рік тому +1

    Great episode, bring them back!

  • @yoshimitsu5537
    @yoshimitsu5537 Рік тому

    Hahahahahaha, this was great! Best edition of Staple or Stinker yet!

  • @KronprinzWaldemar
    @KronprinzWaldemar Рік тому

    Love this concept. Yu-Gi-Oh players are perfect for it, because they can value the effects and I also learn sth new about the cards sometimes + see myself in it, thinking a card is good and it turns out it barely works playing it.

  • @fajenthygia5760
    @fajenthygia5760 Рік тому +1

    Me: Oh, this is such a fun series.
    Guest: Flips Fires of Invention
    Me: ....you monster.

  • @dragoon6551
    @dragoon6551 Рік тому

    That was too perfect. "How often do you cast cards on your opponents turn in magic?"
    "... yes."

  • @wyrdplae8586
    @wyrdplae8586 2 місяці тому

    "and it's only 11 in the morning..." What a savage.

  • @arthurpotter9092
    @arthurpotter9092 Рік тому +1

    Grim tutor is a staple in the biggest format and was a staple when it was standard legal

    • @vDeadbolt
      @vDeadbolt Рік тому

      Biggest format =\= most competitive.

    • @arthurpotter9092
      @arthurpotter9092 Рік тому

      @@vDeadbolt the title isn't "yugioh darlings rate the competitive viability of cards"

    • @vDeadbolt
      @vDeadbolt Рік тому

      @@arthurpotter9092 you do realize that this channel tackles subjects about the competitive scene? On top of that, you think Yu-Gi-Oh players are gonna answer questions about a casual format they haven't played at all? Most Yugioh content creators play competitive Yugioh, since that is the lifeblood of the whole scene.

  • @grin_of_grimmsnarl1333
    @grin_of_grimmsnarl1333 Рік тому

    Bitterblossom was a fun analysis. I could see how someone would call it a stinker without knowing that there's deep synergy with Faeries/Bitterblossom.

  • @anthonycannet1305
    @anthonycannet1305 Рік тому

    Something I realized when they went over the Faithless Looting is that yugioh doesn’t have keywords. Coming from a game where an ability appearing on multiple cards will get shortened to a keyword to save text on each card, seeing that something is a keyword indicates that it’s probably on a bunch of cards, and in this case the reminder text on flashback says it can be used/played/cast/activated from the graveyard so if you discard a card that also has flashback or a similar effect then that card can still be used almost as if you didn’t discard it. That was something that they probably hadn’t thought about because they’re coming from a game that doesn’t shorten text, so the connection that something being shortened means it likely appears multiple times probably didn’t come to them when trying to seduce the value of the card. Of course, they still got it right, but that’s just something I realized while watching.

  • @satibel
    @satibel Рік тому

    bitterblossom is basically every turn pay 400 life to summon a 400/400 that can attack your opponent's lp directly.

  • @Phished123
    @Phished123 7 місяців тому

    the most fun thing about magic is finding ways to make sinker cards work. Granted this is a precon so I didnt brew it or anything, but I have the grave danger gisa and geralf commander deck and grimoire of the dead is in it. In the context of a graveyard recursion commander deck its fun. Because the pain of having to discard a card to put the counter on it is lessened by being able to cast zombies from my graveyard. It still usually gets taken care of pretty fast at a full commander pod, but its still so fun if you do get to activate it, and it works as a distraction piece.

  • @jetblackvalias
    @jetblackvalias Рік тому

    in fairness a lot of MTG players, myself included, didn’t realise how insane bitterblossom was until they played against it

  • @wombleking
    @wombleking Рік тому +2

    Although i've been playing MTG for a very long time and like to think I'm pretty knowledgable - I've never seen Grimoire of the Dead in my life.

  • @Mr_X_7206
    @Mr_X_7206 17 днів тому

    Showing them a Grim Tutor while leaving out cards like Demonic Tutor/Vampiric Tutor to explain why Grim Tutor is a stinker, is pure evil XD

  • @ROYBGP
    @ROYBGP Рік тому

    More of these episodes man. Love this stuff.

  • @Fishmeaker
    @Fishmeaker Рік тому

    Great episode! Hope we will see them in another episode again.

  • @Xenobears
    @Xenobears 10 місяців тому

    The grimoire can be very good when paired with things like voltaic key, in a deck that just heavily abuses your graveyard, or when you’re discarding cards that have an effect when discarded.
    On its own, the best it usually achieves is getting the opponent to kill it with one of their targeted destruction abilities.

    • @vDeadbolt
      @vDeadbolt 6 місяців тому

      You still need setup for it to be good. If you need to use Voltaic key for am artifact, that artifact should either win you the game on its own or help you win the game. There are better 1 card setups for graveyard shenanigans.

  • @WinterAyars
    @WinterAyars Рік тому

    One thing that's important about Bitterblossom that got totally glossesd over was that the creatures fly. They have trash base stats, but because they can avoid having to tangle with other creatures that gives you a lot of power in how you use them and means it's more likely you'll be able to build up a good board position rather than trading your dudes off to no effect every turn.
    Putting up Grim Tutor is like bullying.

  • @ChaoticMeatballTV
    @ChaoticMeatballTV Рік тому

    As both a Pokemon and Yugioh player, I thought Grim Tutor was CRAZY since the former has Cram-o-matic, a 50% chance to search at the cost of discarding and item and has seen quite a bit of play, and Yugioh would never dare print a card like this, the closest I can think of is Left Arm Offering, banishing your entire hand for just a single spell card. But hey, I guess having to pay 1 Colorless 2 Black for another card that you then have to pay for makes it bad.

  • @HiyaaGeorgie
    @HiyaaGeorgie Рік тому

    The tutor was such a good trap!
    I would’ve also mention to them the difference between instant and sorcery speed interaction. Main reason why I think it’s a stinker is because you can’t play on someone’s end step.

  • @marshalllenhart7923
    @marshalllenhart7923 Рік тому

    "I feel like I read a bunch of words and they made no sense"
    SAID THE YUGIOH PLAYER

  • @obrechenny
    @obrechenny 2 місяці тому +1

    Grimoire of dead in the Yu-gi-oh perspective looks even worse, then in mtg. You need cards very much in Yu-gi-oh, you can't just casually sacrifice 4 of them. And you also need 4 turns to use this, while many games last much shorter. And on the top they have cards like "Destroy all enemy's spells almost for free". I have no idea why they thought it can be a good card, it is awful.

  • @diegoblin9090
    @diegoblin9090 Рік тому

    Next time there are two guest could do a double stampo animation ❤
    Nice episode!