Pilots Go Around Too Late

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
    ✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
    British Airways Airbus A320 late go around decision
    • Adrenaline Rush: Briti...
    Royal Air Maroc Cargo Boeing 767 pitching up after touchdown
    • Watch this sudden nose...
    Air France Airbus A350 head up display view of takeoff in Boston
    • Taking off Boston with...
    Cessna Caravan hard landing with tailstrike
    • Bad Landing C208
    United Boeing 757 beautiful sunrise takeoff with thrust reduction
    • MASSIVE Sound & Short ...
    ✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
    Merch Store - teespring.com/...
    ✈ CONTACT ME
    Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
    If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 317

  • @careygrant8697
    @careygrant8697 11 місяців тому +95

    I've flown 100s of times, but every time I hear the thrust reduction, my bloods runs cold - think the engines have packed up Stupid, but there you are 😢

    • @mbvallim
      @mbvallim 11 місяців тому +15

      Once you are stable you don’t need full power. Also there are speed limits at certain altitudes. Thrust reduction is completely normal. Finally, a passenger airplane can fly with only 1 engine if the other one fails.

    • @MBL2210
      @MBL2210 11 місяців тому +5

      Wouldn’t it be scary if you needed to go full power to stay airborne?

    • @mbvallim
      @mbvallim 11 місяців тому +5

      @@MBL2210Exactly… also once the airplane achieved V1 (in simple words, seconds before taking off), one of the engines can fail and the airplane can still come back and land safely.

    • @MBL2210
      @MBL2210 11 місяців тому +1

      @@mbvallim I'm just tryna calm our homie haha

    • @steveby2622
      @steveby2622 11 місяців тому +2

      Used to scare me every time out of Long Beach, cutting engines do to noise restrictions.

  • @verifiedtoxicangel2411
    @verifiedtoxicangel2411 11 місяців тому +3

    I remember my first flight and the engine sound suddenly reducing after take off. i thought we lost the engines and that was it.
    Till date i'm very surprised at how cool and composed i was , thinking that freaking out wouldn't change anything about the situation. better to go out proudly like a man !!

  • @IaughEveryday
    @IaughEveryday 11 місяців тому +3

    Love your content, thank you for putting these out.

  • @singel09
    @singel09 11 місяців тому +1

    Rr and 757, iconic combi

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

      It was a P&W B757....United!

    • @singel09
      @singel09 11 місяців тому +1

      @@daftvader4218 no way. Look at the RR logo on the engine

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

      @@singel09 You are RIGHT..
      That is not a United -200 as 3mins states... which has P&W but a 757 -300 with RR...
      Winglets !!!!
      Well done !!!
      Looking on my phone

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому

      @@singel09 Hi
      I am STILL wrong!!
      All B757 now have winglets
      save 5%fuel and reduce wake.
      My knowledge is about 30 years old when I used to fly RR B 757 with no winglets. .
      All those planes are probably in the desert...
      My apologies.
      All the best

  • @LaxianKey1
    @LaxianKey1 11 місяців тому

    Looks like the Air France A-350 was taking off from KBOS (Logan Airport, Boston MA).

  • @bmused55
    @bmused55 11 місяців тому +1

    There is nothing like the sound of an RB211 at take off power. Music to my ears.

  • @MCMXI1
    @MCMXI1 11 місяців тому

    Great channel ! Earned a sub

  • @nurrizadjatmiko21
    @nurrizadjatmiko21 11 місяців тому +2

    In the BA A320 clip, You can always go around but they are late to do that

  • @neils5539
    @neils5539 11 місяців тому +2

    As someone who hears every sound in the plane, that thrust reduction creeps me out every time. I'm like, what happened, did we lose an engine, are we falling, etc.

    • @careygrant8697
      @careygrant8697 11 місяців тому +1

      Saw this after I'd just said much the same thing. Glad I'm not the only person who feels like this.

    • @damlatorun6756
      @damlatorun6756 11 місяців тому +1

      Same here

    • @alfonsocuiti
      @alfonsocuiti 11 місяців тому

      After hundreds of flights, it still gets me every time. It just feels wrong 😅

  • @3ruhCupSeries
    @3ruhCupSeries 11 місяців тому

    Good video

  • @wirlmc2010
    @wirlmc2010 11 місяців тому

    When do you think my video will get on there @3MinutesofAviation

  • @geoffcarlton4047
    @geoffcarlton4047 11 місяців тому

    Touch and go

  • @nic9972
    @nic9972 11 місяців тому

    757 engines still the best sound in aviation

  • @kapilk1644
    @kapilk1644 11 місяців тому

    how does the HUD stay synced up with the camera?

  • @AlMedic2000
    @AlMedic2000 11 місяців тому

    Cessna just performed a controlled crash!

  • @TLOaks_
    @TLOaks_ 11 місяців тому +1

    RR engines always have the most hideous sounds and squeals.

  • @VictheSecret
    @VictheSecret 11 місяців тому

    That was a deliberate touch and go, not a go around.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 11 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely not. They would’ve lowered the nose, reset the flaps for take off and wouldn’t have had the spoilers armed.

  • @southpakrules
    @southpakrules 11 місяців тому

    1.3k+

  • @marmactwins
    @marmactwins 11 місяців тому

    Why do you headline like this? I was under the impression “too late” for a go around would result in a runway incursion.

  • @andrekoscianski
    @andrekoscianski 11 місяців тому

    👍

  • @inisipisTV
    @inisipisTV 11 місяців тому

    He already touched down his wheel, he should already commit to the landing.

  • @TheColinChapman
    @TheColinChapman 11 місяців тому

    The 320 does not go around too late. that plane wasn‘t even close to the end of the runway.

  • @privateer0561
    @privateer0561 11 місяців тому

    Remind me not to fly on a 757. Well, without earplugs...

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

      Fly on a Rolls Royce B757.
      Much quieter
      80% of B757 have RR.
      Not United !!

  • @bonbondesel
    @bonbondesel 11 місяців тому +167

    IT'S NEVER TOO LATE TO GO AROUND ! 😉
    If the reverse thrust is not activated, go-around remains possible after touchdown.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +16

      Totally agreed.
      However in this case, it's not obvious why the go around from an outside view. It's a hard landing, yes, but early on the runway, spoilers deployed, etc... The spoilers deployed for a few seconds indicate that the go around was initiated after a few second on the ground. So it's hard to tell why they have gone around with the aircraft apparently safe on the ground.
      I can only see 2 reasons :
      1. runway incursion further down the runway (invisible on the video)
      2. training flight with no intent to do a full stop.

    • @GyrisCap
      @GyrisCap 11 місяців тому +1

      There is no place where a runway incursion would happen later down the runway. And there is no way in hell, that you would do a training flight into LIS with the intent of a go-around or touch and go. The go around in the case of the BA seems a bit unnecessary.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +6

      @@GyrisCap there are a lot of places for a runway uncursiosns

    • @jimmiller5600
      @jimmiller5600 11 місяців тому +5

      We can't see the runway alignment of the plane. If your mains cross the the centerline the book says "go" and do it better next time.

    • @bonbondesel
      @bonbondesel 11 місяців тому +3

      @@jimmiller5600 That's also what I thought. It can be a training but it doesn't have to be a training necessarely. If they can't maintain centerline properly or even can't confirm that the aircraft will stay on the ground properly, they have to go around. It can take 10 seconds to relalize that the directionnal control is not ensured or that the aircraft refuses the ground. The Pilot Flying will use the reverse thrust only when ensured that full stop landing can be done for this reason.

  • @mikeplantagenet2983
    @mikeplantagenet2983 11 місяців тому +84

    After all these years, I still love flying the 757.

    • @keenanhenry95
      @keenanhenry95 11 місяців тому +4

      I can't wait to fly on it again in December. I LOVE THAT PLANE!!!! ❤

    • @AirplaneDresden
      @AirplaneDresden 11 місяців тому

      yuxingyuyan

  • @Spyke-lz2hl
    @Spyke-lz2hl 11 місяців тому +55

    Most likely, the go around was called just before the relatively hard touchdown. As long as thrust reversers aren’t deployed, you can still go around. Also, once you begin a go around, you follow through with it.

    • @erich930
      @erich930 9 місяців тому +1

      Not likely, as the spoilers were deployed for several seconds. This indicates that the thrust levers were at or near idle. The point where the spoilers retracted again is where the thrust levers were moved.

  • @Glegh
    @Glegh 11 місяців тому +28

    "Go around. Go around. GO AROUND"
    "nope"
    "ok"
    "GOING AROUND"

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +2

      yes but why ? After the hard landing and a few second on the ground with spoilers deployed, the aircraft was safe on the ground. So why the go around ?

    • @OwnedByACatNamedC.C.
      @OwnedByACatNamedC.C. 11 місяців тому +1

      @@n666eoI’m sure there’s any number of reasons; speed too high to safely stop, instability of the landing, high winds, etc. The spooling up of the engines on these planes is not immediate, so it’s likely their decision to do a go around was made even before the wheels touched the runway.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OwnedByACatNamedC.C. : I'm sure there is a good reason. I'm just surprised because in 99.9% of go around, the reason can be guest, not in this case.
      The spooling up is not immediate, but the retractation of spoilers is (at least very short). And the spoilers stayed out for 5 seconds with the aircraft on the ground, which means it took 4 to 5 seconds on the ground to the crew to decide to go around.

  • @jonslg240
    @jonslg240 11 місяців тому +9

    Is anyone else pretty sure that Cessna caravan stalled (its left wing) right before it touched down? Sure looked like it. That wing dropped super fast.

  • @kayta6141
    @kayta6141 11 місяців тому +5

    I may look silly, but, if the BA A320 had already safely touched down, why did the pilots continue with the go-around?

    • @londontransporter
      @londontransporter 11 місяців тому +5

      The pilots must have determined that they couldn’t safely land in time before the end of the runway and if thats the case its always best to just go around than risk injuries if you do overshoot.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому

      @@londontransporter they are on the ground well before the touchdown markers. I would hope they didn't try to land on a runway too short for the aircraft (also, we know this runway 21 at Lisbon, which is more that 3km long...). So the landing was safe.
      The only reason I can see for this go around is a runway incursion down the runway.

    • @damlatorun6756
      @damlatorun6756 11 місяців тому

      I think they had a bounce or something and didn’t feel confident
      Could’ve been anything, really

  • @joannah1657
    @joannah1657 11 місяців тому +25

    Cessnas freak me out enough as is lol. If people could fly tin cans, Cessna comes to my mind.
    The thrust reduction sound always sparks a second of unease in me. Like the sound of engines turning off 😅 that sunrise while above the clouds is gorgeous

    • @SigmundFeud
      @SigmundFeud 11 місяців тому

      Pipers freak me out a lot.
      Hearing a significant thrust reduction on just one of the Cherokee or Piper Cub Rolls Royce power plants drives me to the point where I start squealing like a Cessna 150 stall warning alarm.

  • @alancaro526
    @alancaro526 11 місяців тому +38

    That’s crazy that Cessna stalled onto the runway

    • @SigmundFeud
      @SigmundFeud 11 місяців тому

      Yep! Fabulous, ain't it?
      😁

  • @johnandrews3568
    @johnandrews3568 11 місяців тому +2

    Cessna landing, clearly Aerosucre expanding their service to more... um... 'secret' air strips. Overloaded AF as always. Gotta get the goods there asap, amigo.

    • @Anmeteor9663
      @Anmeteor9663 11 місяців тому +1

      😂 gotta love the cartel airline boys

  • @Oduck22
    @Oduck22 11 місяців тому +2

    2:20 I didn’t realize the sun started to rise in the West sky? This is SFO, runway 1R, north departure. This point of view is the left side and would be facing west. This is a SunSET not SunRISE.

  • @MatthewPettyST1300
    @MatthewPettyST1300 11 місяців тому +49

    I could do the whole 3 minutes of that last one with the 757-200 departure in the early morning. Extremely Gorgeous and love the sound.

    • @storytimewithunclekumaran5004
      @storytimewithunclekumaran5004 11 місяців тому +3

      love the sound.? super annoying.

    • @OwnedByACatNamedC.C.
      @OwnedByACatNamedC.C. 11 місяців тому +3

      @@storytimewithunclekumaran5004To each his own.✌🏻

    • @ImpendingJoker
      @ImpendingJoker 11 місяців тому

      One of the most unique sounds in aviation is the sound of a 757 with Roll-Royce engines on it. It is a sound that is known quite well, and if you find it annoying are you even an aviation fan?@@storytimewithunclekumaran5004

    • @user-ew3dm1jq6j
      @user-ew3dm1jq6j 11 місяців тому +1

      I love the sound of a C-5 Galaxy taking off.

    • @johnt.4947
      @johnt.4947 11 місяців тому +1

      As an ex-USAF jet eng mechanic, I totally agree!

  • @mboykin6047
    @mboykin6047 11 місяців тому +5

    That final clip of the departure from SFO was at sunset to the west, not sunrise.

  • @electricity1404
    @electricity1404 11 місяців тому +54

    0:57 apart from the pitch up, that was quite a smooth landing!

    • @aviation2everybody
      @aviation2everybody 11 місяців тому +5

      Good there were no passengers 😂

    • @ethancheng7524
      @ethancheng7524 11 місяців тому +1

      @AbductedbyAliens58it was a cargo plane...?

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

      Appalling landing technique on that B767..
      Nothing smooth about that poor technique. ..

  • @chrishan9138
    @chrishan9138 11 місяців тому +6

    That cessna... practically smashed the wing into the ground as well despite the high wing design 🙈

  • @RobertCraft-re5sf
    @RobertCraft-re5sf 11 місяців тому +24

    2:18 I love the buzzsaw sound of big turbofans at full thrust. That's the fan blade tips breaking the sound barrier.

    • @plaidomelette4358
      @plaidomelette4358 11 місяців тому +2

      That’s what that noise is on the plane? Really? That’s cool!

    • @kpjt7282
      @kpjt7282 11 місяців тому +2

      I was curious, thanks! I've heard this sound before but I feel like not on every flight.

  • @FLLdude
    @FLLdude 11 місяців тому +2

    It's only a late go-around if it runs out of runway ;)

  • @BoloH.
    @BoloH. 11 місяців тому +5

    That A350 HUD is just so cool

  • @Twobarpsi
    @Twobarpsi 11 місяців тому +1

    I don't like seeing commercial pilots playing around with, and wearing GoPro cameras...that shouldn't be allowed!

  • @christopherbedford9897
    @christopherbedford9897 11 місяців тому +2

    That Caravan didn't just tail strike - left wingtip too and the left main gear took quite a thump. I'm guessing a trip to the workshop and a whole lot of x-ray / ultrasonic examination followed 😬😬

  • @NookCrannyTrips
    @NookCrannyTrips 11 місяців тому +2

    The late go around one, does anybody know why in this situation the pilots still decide to go around while the plane seems to be landed and in stable condition? I have seen a couple of similar go arounds and wonder why?
    My best guess is that when go around is initiated it cannot be aborted and there is a delay for the engine to respond to the go around original command.

    • @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion
      @MyNotSoHumbleOpinion 11 місяців тому +3

      Yes there's a gap between the TO/GA command and the engine revs up, but it's relatively small! Considering the time that it stays on the ground, probably the pilot initiated the go around just a second before he touched down because the spoilers were not deployed! The reason is unknown, but it could be everything, even an ATC order!

    • @NookCrannyTrips
      @NookCrannyTrips 11 місяців тому +1

      @@MyNotSoHumbleOpinion Thanks for your reply and explanation 🌺

    • @gerardmoran9560
      @gerardmoran9560 11 місяців тому

      @@MyNotSoHumbleOpinion Downfield runway incursion seems possible.

  • @TOM-C.
    @TOM-C. 11 місяців тому +1

    2:18 Is that a crack in the engine mount? Is it oil leaking out? Either way I'd be concerned as a passenger!😲😁👍😎✌🗽

  • @damlatorun6756
    @damlatorun6756 11 місяців тому +2

    2:02 nothing like stalling onto the runway ❤

  • @charlesphillips8635
    @charlesphillips8635 11 місяців тому +1

    Fan buzz, fan blade tips going supersonic at high power settings, they stop when cruising.

  • @superdude512
    @superdude512 11 місяців тому +3

    2:00 that Cessna landing feels so chaotic, it almost seems like it's coming in hot but then it tip stalls right before touching down? Was it overloaded or something?

    • @Elizabeth-tg7jo
      @Elizabeth-tg7jo 11 місяців тому +2

      Maybe a density altitude error. Scary.

    • @damlatorun6756
      @damlatorun6756 11 місяців тому

      That pilot didn’t land, they fell with style

  • @johnlratcliffe
    @johnlratcliffe 11 місяців тому +1

    Good channel but again? Why the odd caption?

  • @cjmillsnun
    @cjmillsnun 11 місяців тому +10

    On the BA A320, reversers hadn't deployed they'd had a bounce, go around was the correct option.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +1

      I'm not sure about this one. The aircraft has been on the ground with spoilers deployed for 5 seconds, before the go around was initiated. I would have agreed if the spoilers went down just after the very small bounce. But 5 seconds later, with the aircraft rolling safely, is a bit long...

  • @Viking88Power
    @Viking88Power 11 місяців тому +2

    mmmm RB211

  • @coasternut3091
    @coasternut3091 11 місяців тому +1

    That Caravan has the opposite of a soft field landing

  • @yobb1n544
    @yobb1n544 11 місяців тому +14

    I've never seen an A320 do a touch and go before!

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 11 місяців тому

      I believe circuits is mandatory with an Airbus type rating. On occasion I’ve seen A380’s in the circuit as the pilots get practice.

  • @daftvader4218
    @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

    It is not unusual for the wheels to touch the runway on a go around.......does not mean a late go around especially when performing a low visibility approach.
    It all depends when the decision to go around was made....
    There is no such thing as a LATE go around. ..
    Just a go around !!!

    • @damlatorun6756
      @damlatorun6756 11 місяців тому

      I experienced one of those once
      Long story short, that airport was previously for military activities only, and it was made slightly bigger to handle commercial aircraft. The terrain is pretty rough, and the weather isn’t the best. Not to mention the runways are relatively tiny so even the most experienced pilots do at least 3 go-arounds during landing. One of those go-arounds happened to be a bit late…

  • @XXSkunkWorksXX
    @XXSkunkWorksXX 11 місяців тому

    Imagine you're a topgun - flying off CVN carriers and engaging Iranian MiGs in your Tomcat then you retire and 6 months later, your muscle memory still sharp, you get a job flying the Airbus with its swanky new headsup display. You'd be trying smoke enemy Air Somalia 737s and shoot down bogies at 2 o'clock only to find out it was a TUI Dreamliner heading for TFS with a full compliment of old age pensioners (with AK47s)!!

  • @firstcapt75
    @firstcapt75 11 місяців тому +1

    It is never too late to go around unless you have deployed your reversers 😉

  • @transporder
    @transporder 4 місяці тому +1

    The smell of rubber came here 😅😅

  • @EdOeuna
    @EdOeuna 11 місяців тому +3

    I’m guessing that the BA A320 did the baulked landing because of the lack of flare and heavy landing. However, there should be more than enough runway remaining to complete the landing in such a small aircraft. They made the decision and stuck with it.

    • @Jwc77766
      @Jwc77766 11 місяців тому

      It was windshear mate.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 11 місяців тому

      @@Jwc77766- it wasn’t. There just wasn’t much of a flare and they dumped it on the runway.
      If they suffered windshear that late in the landing then it would be safer to continue with the landing and not go around.

  • @thomasmixson7064
    @thomasmixson7064 11 місяців тому

    The 206 "landing" was a crash landing requiring extensive & crazily expensive inspections & repairs if needed. You could easily rack up a bill of 50k or better

  • @jonslg240
    @jonslg240 11 місяців тому

    That go-around was later than my girlfriends last period!
    I'm jk..
    We all know I don't have a girlfriend.

  • @mrfuture1223
    @mrfuture1223 10 місяців тому

    The BA a320 pilot was like:
    Nahh, this landing was not butter enough, I'm gonna give another shot!!

  • @oboealto
    @oboealto 11 місяців тому

    I genuinely thought that Royal Air Morocco had some serious typos, and had to check it up to confirm it's Royal Air Maroc!

  • @johngreen6783
    @johngreen6783 11 місяців тому +1

    TOGA! TOGA! TOGA!

  • @BrianAchterberg928
    @BrianAchterberg928 11 місяців тому +3

    1:54 RyanAir landing school

  • @LisbonAirportSpotting
    @LisbonAirportSpotting 11 місяців тому +1

    Great catches! Nice video!

  • @ChrisBohling
    @ChrisBohling 11 місяців тому

    Is it just me? The video quality must be 480, max. I don’t have the option to change it.

  • @youngrich718
    @youngrich718 10 місяців тому

    The first one wasn't a late go around.. the pilot thought he could've had an controlled landing but due to the windy conditions he had to pick up back speed and go lift off again

  • @bunglejoy3645
    @bunglejoy3645 11 місяців тому

    Only think i thought i heard on radio i presume he ment military aircraft something about tornado behind Im not sure what ATC were refering to

  • @ChuddleBuggy
    @ChuddleBuggy 11 місяців тому

    Anybody else notice how Boeing aircraft seems to have more engine noise and resonance intrusion into the cabin? Airbus on the other hand have quieter engines but noisier pumps and hydraulics.

  • @markmark5269
    @markmark5269 11 місяців тому

    The A320 seemed to be empty, maybe a training go around?

  • @TheUtuber999
    @TheUtuber999 11 місяців тому

    "I'm gonna go around and try it again."
    "But we're on the ground."
    "I know, but my OCD compels me to try it again to grease it."

  • @mickg7299
    @mickg7299 11 місяців тому

    That old 757-200 sounds more like a cheap sex toy 🫨

  • @rollingthunder277
    @rollingthunder277 11 місяців тому

    That Caravan landing was pitiful, and probably didn't do any damage.

  • @KingCommander1000
    @KingCommander1000 11 місяців тому

    Curious why the BA would do a go around... looked like a normal touchdown?

  • @whytebearconcepts
    @whytebearconcepts 11 місяців тому

    I live a KM north of the Runways 11L/R for KFAT, my first cup of morning coffee at 6AM sees an American Airlines 737, a SWA 737, an Alaska Airlines RJ and the morning FedEx 767 and UPS 757 depart. All in less than 10 minutes.

  • @stijnvandamme76
    @stijnvandamme76 11 місяців тому

    if that Cessna had been 10 feet higher when his left wing dipped, it would have been way uglier

  • @hugochan2821
    @hugochan2821 11 місяців тому

    The go around is a must. The plane is falling down like a rock, and without go around, the plane will likely bounce, or even lead to a collapsed landing gear.
    It is smart for pilot to increase thrust, so the momentum is pushed forwards, and less stress is put on the landing gear. Nothing wrong in the video, in terms of pilot maneuver

  • @giovannizn
    @giovannizn 11 місяців тому

    Episode: Bouncing around and a barking Rolls Royce.

  • @fhedvall
    @fhedvall 11 місяців тому

    huh, french airbus and QNH in inch, why not HPa?

  • @russellprout723
    @russellprout723 11 місяців тому

    Cessna passenger to pilot, Have we landed or did we crash?

  • @Nickdevro
    @Nickdevro 11 місяців тому

    That pilot broke the left landing gear strut on that C208.... 🤦🏽‍♂️

  • @FlatOutMatt
    @FlatOutMatt 11 місяців тому +2

    Until the reversers come out, it’s never “too late”.

    • @chrisschack9716
      @chrisschack9716 11 місяців тому +1

      And it's only too late then because it takes a few seconds to stow them again, so you can't apply thrust in a timely fashion.

    • @FlatOutMatt
      @FlatOutMatt 11 місяців тому

      @@chrisschack9716 yes indeed - “too late” by SOP 😎

  • @myrskylintu1
    @myrskylintu1 11 місяців тому

    Cessna tipstalled. I did not know they can tipstall like that.

  • @rickwilliamson9248
    @rickwilliamson9248 8 місяців тому

    A "too late" go-around usually results in a crash.

  • @АлександрОболенский-к7й
    @АлександрОболенский-к7й 11 місяців тому +1

    do 757-200 has a rolls royce engines?

    • @ronparrish6666
      @ronparrish6666 11 місяців тому

      Delta has PR American has RR and most others have a mix the PR engines are also the same ones on the C 17

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому +1

      @@ronparrish6666 This is a United -200 with P&W engines. .
      About 80 % of B757's have RR engines.

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 11 місяців тому

      I believe most B757 have RR...

  • @jhmcd2
    @jhmcd2 11 місяців тому

    And knowing the pilot of that bush pilot, he probably got more people on and went right back up in the air.

  • @chriscox4085
    @chriscox4085 11 місяців тому

    The RAM pilot was just practicing their soft field landings.

  • @drhossawy
    @drhossawy 11 місяців тому

    It’s actually a very tough decision. It’s very compelling to pilots to just land already if you’re all the way there. Only in few seconds you have to decide.

  • @clqudy4750
    @clqudy4750 11 місяців тому +3

    I love the 75s...sports car of the sky!

  • @madge8611
    @madge8611 11 місяців тому

    First one is hydraulic system failure

  • @RJSAMCRO
    @RJSAMCRO 11 місяців тому +1

    I'm curious about the Pilot's HUD. Do they think it's more helpful than traditional methods of using instrument panels or do they find it not so helpful? I only ask because I've seen some pilots say in reference to flying they will only fly Boeing because they don't like the Side Stick on Airbus. I would imagine it would be the senior veteran pilots more than newer ones. I just wonder though if they like aviation innovation and the direction it's heading to.

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +4

      I've flown with HUD on small planes. The simple fact that you can keep you eyes outside, and during approach, that your aiming point is actually shown in real time on the landscape, is just amazing. Hand flying is a lot more natural with a HUD for me.

    • @RJSAMCRO
      @RJSAMCRO 11 місяців тому +1

      @@n666eo That is interesting I wasn't aware smaller planes were using HUD as well. Do you fly a Lear or Cessna style plane?

    • @sh230968
      @sh230968 11 місяців тому

      Which pilots do you speak to? 1930s or 1940s?

    • @n666eo
      @n666eo 11 місяців тому +1

      @@RJSAMCRO It was on an experimental aircraft, quite similar to a Vans. It's very very not common in this kind of aircraft. But it was a very interesting experience !

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 11 місяців тому +2

      I’ve been flying with a HUD since 2001. A lot of pilots refused to switch, but finally the FAA requires them to use the hud during training. Suddenly a lot of my coworkers regret not switching earlier to the HUD.
      It’s way more helpful. I barely look down and the regular displays. More importantly, you have your eyes outside at all times.
      I think Boeing and Airbus are installing HUDs on their latest aircraft, because too many of the younger generation keep their focus inside 100% of the time. You can actually see it on all these UA-cam videos how pilots go “inside” while the airplane is still on the ground.

  • @RobSchofield
    @RobSchofield 11 місяців тому

    @ 2:03 "Hard Landing" = S**t landing.

  • @tonybrown4092
    @tonybrown4092 11 місяців тому

    I never want to go through that ever again

  • @ocrim16
    @ocrim16 4 місяці тому

    it's never too late for a go around

  • @jamessimms415
    @jamessimms415 11 місяців тому

    Sadly, no Aerosucrae

  • @andyb1653
    @andyb1653 11 місяців тому

    0:22
    Everyone on that plane is 1 inch shorter, now.

  • @Deion245
    @Deion245 11 місяців тому +1

    Nice video

  • @ghostrider-be9ek
    @ghostrider-be9ek 11 місяців тому

    2:20 - GTFO of san fran as fast as possible! good job!

  • @cris_261
    @cris_261 11 місяців тому

    Accidentally read Royal Air Maroc as "Ryan Air Maroc."

  • @yacko00
    @yacko00 11 місяців тому +2

    Title sucks.. too late means too late, not made it easily...

  • @katiekitchen895
    @katiekitchen895 11 місяців тому +51

    Was that last engine noise normal? Hugely annoying all flight long, if it was.

    • @sebsaviationyyc
      @sebsaviationyyc 11 місяців тому +56

      Usually it only makes that sound on full power or high thrust settings, so you only really hear it on takeoff. You also hear it louder when you're sitting in front of the engines than behind them.

    • @alexnutcasio936
      @alexnutcasio936 11 місяців тому +18

      Thats Rolls Royce aircraft engines . GE much quieter and more efficient.

    • @Youtub77W
      @Youtub77W 11 місяців тому +33

      It is normal, it’s a 757 with RR. At around 15000ft, you no longer hear this sound, the wind become louder.

    • @JRobAviation
      @JRobAviation 11 місяців тому +6

      It is. As the aircraft climbs and accelerates the sound of the air flowing around the airplane over takes the engine noise. At cruise the sound in the cabin is similar to that of a fast flowing river.

    • @katiekitchen895
      @katiekitchen895 11 місяців тому +9

      Thanks Gentlemen, obvs I can only afford to sit behind the engines and usually next row up from the loos, so the noises I hear are quite different!
      Perversely I enjoy watching this channel, even though it is about mistakes and occurrences that are beyond my comprehension, but the sheer magnificence of flight is a joy to behold (landing safely better!)