Hillary Clinton Slips Up With SHOCKING Accusation In LIVE Interview
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 тра 2024
- Hillary Clinton makes a stunning political mistake by accusing college protesters of being completely ignorant regarding history of the Middle East during interview on MSNBC. John Iadarola and Brett Erlich break it down on The Damage Report.
Read more here:
Hillary Clinton Accuses Protesters of Ignorance of Mideast History - www.nytimes.com/2024/05/09/us...
"Hillary Clinton on Thursday criticized campus protesters, saying young people “don’t know very much” about the history of the Middle East.
“I have had many conversations, as you have had, with a lot of young people over the last many months now,” she said on the MSNBC show “Morning Joe” on Thursday. “They don’t know very much at all about the history of the Middle East, or frankly about history, in many areas of the world, including in our own country.”
Ms. Clinton then went on to imply that young people “don’t know” that had Yasir Arafat, the former leader of the Palestinian Authority, accepted a deal brokered by her husband, President Bill Clinton, the Palestinians would already have a state of their own. “It’s one of the great tragedies of history that he was unable to say yes,” she said."
**
Be part of the Dragon Squad as a UA-cam channel member: go.tyt.com/join-tdr
Follow The Damage Report on Facebook: / thedamagereporttyt
Help build the Home of the Progressives tyt.com/JOIN
Subscribe to The Damage Report UA-cam channel: ua-cam.com/users/thedamagerepo...
Follow The Damage Report on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@thedamagerepo...
Follow The Damage Report on Instagram: / thedamagereport
Follow The Damage Report on Twitter: / thedamagereport
#TheDamageReport #JohnIadarola #TheYoungTurks
Join as a UA-cam channel member at go.tyt.com/tdr-join
You talk about "Truth to power"?
She spoke the truth.
How many Americans can pass a US Citizenship test?
There's a series on the History Channel called 'The Men Who Built America' which I think should be COMPULSORY for HS students to watch and then pass a test on.
On the 'Tonight Show', Jay Leno went into the public and asked these two 20 something females,
"Who did we fight against in WW II?
After much hair twirling and giggling their answer was....drum roll
"Canada".
Any thoughts, John?
For those of you who may be ignorant of our history: this is exactly the arrogance that ushered Trump into office the first time.
Hmmm is it? Pretty sure racism ushered him in, that and misogyny. Nothing she said there was wrong, so she didn’t say it in a Molly coddling way, but trump speaks way worse and lies so no, it was definitely ignorance of history and the wanton need to keep women and minorities out of white mens business!
@@aflairforthedramatics Yeah, there were a lot of factors. Comey opening a bullshit case ten days before the election didn't help. There was also interference from Putin. But Hillary was supposed to be a professional and trying really hard to win, so what she did was continue to insult her primary opponent long after he'd endorsed her, to insult his base long after we'd agreed to vote against Trump, failed to campaign in Michigan, etc. Hillary made a *lot* of unforced errors. She was the wrong messenger to deal with the GOPs newfound open racism, given that she'd once ingratiated herself with GOP senators by calling black children "super predators." Hillary is not the unifying figure she thinks she is. She was particularly critical of Bernie supporters at a time when she was beating Trump by 10%. It kind of felt like she just decided she didn't need our votes, so she poured out a bunch of insults. Her supporters told us they didn't need our votes and would not share the victory with us and would make a point of ensuring M4All never got passed. That isn't how you win.
History does not warrant genocide.
She never made that suggestion. A bunch of you people are putting words in her mouth, words she would never say.
@@dafttoolnah
Either the history matters when protesting genocide, or it doesn't.
She came out to disparage young adults, which heavily implies she thinks the history justifies genocide. She's wrong
@@aaron101889 She wasn’t speaking about genocide. She was speaking about the history of the region, which those protesters are mostly ignorant about, which you don’t give a flying flip about. So instead of listening to what she was saying, you get sanctimonious in your indignation, trying to put words into her mouth, words she would NEVER say. Quit making enemies of your only allies.
History is FULL of genocide.
Pick a century.
I'm not saying that I support it. It's an INTEGRAL part of human history.
@@dafttool "She never made that suggestion"
She's saying people would give Israel a pass if they knew the history. So tell us which part of the history justifies genocide.
i’m not with her
Her talking down to young people is a gift to Republicans.
Hillary started out as a Goldwater Republican. She'll end as big a Loser as Trump.
In MOST cultures, elders "talk down" to young people.
It's a sort of unwritten "right". In most cultures, it's not taken as a slight but treated as a listening moment, as (free) advice from a person with life experiences and knowledge that a young person DOES NOT have.
@@69bobr yeah but that's all based upon the idea that the elders have real advice to give. She's managed to lose the most winnable general election, maybe ever, that's why she doesn't have the right. Between her and the DNC, losing in 2016 was a major eff up.
Why then doesn’t our government stop funneling money to one side?
Them that has, gits!
At this point Hillary has nothing to lose, unless Trump wins in November.
I'm seventy-eight years old and I cannot ever remember a time when Israel wasn't oppressing Palestinians or offering them an unjust resolution to the conflict. It's always been oppression while maligning them as terrorists if they complain.
Since you're 78, then you were alive during the war of 67, and 73.
@@molasorrosalom4846 I was alive during the war of 67 and 73. My opinion of Israel and the Palestinian people has changed over the years as I learned more about the horrible realities suffered by Palestinians at the hands of Israelis.
@@jamesyoung1022Cool, easy solution then.
Give the West Bank back to Jordan and Gaza back to Egypt.
Except those countries would never take those territories back.
@@molasorrosalom4846 More practical solution. Israel returns to its original borders and stays there.
@@jamesyoung1022So Gaza would be returned back to Egypt, Golan Heights back to Syria and the West Bank back to Jordan?
That your solution?
Her hubris is disgusting.
She didn't lie gave no context like Arafat wanted to control their own water but hey no lies
24 years ago…. Are we still at war with England?
If an ammosexual says to you, "AR doesn't stand for Assault Rifle, it stands for Armalite Rifle," bring up the AR-24. This is Armalite's 9mm pistol. Then mock them back for not being able to tell the difference between a pistol and a rifle. The "AR" is likely just the first two letters of Armalite to give it a cool sounded identification code, but it doesn't officially stand for anything.
Just a horrible human being she’s turned out to be
The Nazis were German and they inflicted horrendous things on the Jews and many others, especially German Jews. I agree that these victims deserve a homeland where they could be safe made of German lands, have the perpetrators pay not innocent Palestinians that had lived for thousands of years in those lands.
I've been saying for years they should have got the Alsace Lorraine area. For one thing, its separated from the rest of Germany by a mountain range. For another, it would have been a total prize for a new state. Its a very wealthy industrial province with lots of natural resources. And it would have taken German land, as appropriate, instead of just robbing some brown-people country.
Insulting people as an attempt to persuade people is always a bad idea
Thank you John. I watched this video to the end and you handled your disagreement with HRC and your co-host quite well, passionately, and LOGICALLY: "It's never productive to try to undercut a principled stand with an assertion of lack of knowledge."
also
"You don't need to go to graduate school to have vaules and act on them."
Of all the writers in the TYT system, you are the best. Well, you MIGHT be in a tie with Sam Seder. 🙂
What Ehud Barak “offered” at Camp David (I put “offered” in quotes because stolen land wasn't his to offer) did not provide territorial contiguity, sovereign control of airspace, any part of Jerusalem proper, recognition of Palestinian refugees’ right of return. It also allowed Israel to keep large chunks of the West Bank in exchange for useless Negev desert land. In other words, a Palestinian state in name only, without full sovereignty and without settling the injustices and disputes that lay at the root of the problem. It did not even comply with the existing demands of international law placed upon Israel!
Let's put it this way: If it was such a “generous offer,” as the media put it, then imagine if the Palestinian side offered the exact same terms to Israel, only in reverse. Would Israel have accepted it? No, it would have been considered insulting. The only reason it was ever perceived as “generous” was because the US and Israel do not see Palestinians as human beings deserving of anything. Thus anything they are “given” (in this case, land that was already theirs) was more than they deserved as non-humans. The used car salesman does not get to call his own offer “generous.”
It’s also offensive for Hillary to blame an ongoing genocide on the Palestinian people for not having capitulated to a disingenuous “offer” in 2000. What kind of “generous offer” gives one side of the negotiating table the right to commit genocide on the other side if the offer is refused?
One more thing: Two years before the Camp David Summit, First Lady Hillary Clinton used the word “Palestine” in the context of a possible Palestinian state. This angered mainstream American Jewish organizations, and the media quoted some American Jews as saying they felt “unsafe” hearing Hillary say these things. See, at the time, even saying the word “Palestine” or talking about a Palestinian state was borderline anti-Semitic. The White House had to backtrack and say that the First Lady was mistaken. Since then, Hillary has learned her ways and now she toes the line.
So you completely ignore the terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, as the reason this war started? And many-many other attacks done by it before.
@@user-wu1ll9ps6l I was making a direct response to Hillary's claims about Camp David 2000. Get it?
However, if you want to talk about who started what, then let's keep in mind that Hamas formed in 1988. It would not have existed if not for decades of Israeli oppression of the Palestinians and continued theft of Palestinian land. Israel allowed Hamas to form as a counter to the secular PLO.
Tell me: What was Rabin's response to the nonviolent mass protests of the first Intifada that preceded the formation of Hamas? Why was he known at the time as the “bone-breaker”?
If Israel had been acting in “self-defense” all this time, why did it plant Jewish civilians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (essentially, “human shields” and “facts on the ground”), at the expense of Palestinians already living there, in violation of the 4th Geneva Convention? Why did it raze Palestinian homes and prevent Palestinian refugees who had fled during wartime from returning home? Why do Israeli maps depict the West Bank as belonging to Israel, yet deny Palestinian residents of the West Bank citizenship rights? Why, prior to October 7, did Israel assert direct control over significant parts of the Gaza Strip, instituting kill zones, as well as controlling Gaza's shoreline along the Mediterranean, inhibiting fishing? Why does Israel even control the population registry of the Gaza Strip?
That’s what I recall about those negotiations, too- ‘Here Palestine, we’ll let you exist, with a few scraps, maybe, ish’. It was NOT full sovereignty.
@@user-wu1ll9ps6l So you completely ignore the terrorist attack on Palestine by israel, as the reason this war started? And many-many other attacks done by it before.
@@user-wu1ll9ps6l "you completely ignore the terrorist attack"
You completely ignore the genocidal "settlements" which are mass home invasions where those who built those houses are forced into the ghetto at Gaza which is basically Warsaw in ww2. "Never Again" is an empty statement when its being committed by those for whom "Never Again" was a lesson we were supposed to remember. It got twisted into "Never Again against us but its fine against anyone else."
Asserting that Arafat simply said "no" without explaining his reasons is at best misleading and at worst manipulative. As someone experienced in real estate, I know that parties often come to the negotiating table and disagree on terms. If I don't like the terms of a deal, I reject them, regardless of the other side's opinion of my decision. Naturally, the opposing party will praise the deal because it aligns with their agenda. Moreover, to suggest that previous attempts were isolated incidents overlooks the broader context of ongoing conflict and its long-term repercussions. Clinton's approach often comes across as elitist and condescending, which is a reflection of her personality. However, accusing her of merely stating facts overlooks that what was actually presented were partial truths, leaving out the complete story.
On foreign policy and a number of other issues, she's ALWAYS been a Republican. Originally she was a member of the GOP when she was young and it was only the overt racism that drove her away.
@@mimseydemon1844 Was it the racism though? As recently as 2016 she was bragging about being a "Goldwater Girl" because it was the candidacy of Barry Goldwater that activated her politically. Barry Goldwater invented the Southern Strategy. He was the first candidate to run against the civil rights acts. She was perfectly fine with that in 1964 when she volunteered for Barry Goldwater.
For reasons beyond my ken, she doesn't even know that her own husband realized the offer was awful, so he again met up with the parties in Taba, Egypt, just after he left office. At that meeting a settlement was nearly reached, as per a video on my page at the very bottom entitled, "In the First Hour of the Obama Presidency with Noam Chomsky." Unfortunately, the Israelis walked away from those discussions after calling for elections. Sharon got in and the rest is history. I by no means consider myself an expert on any of this, but one thing is certain and that's that the Palestinians have never been given a reasonable offer.
She suggests that the protesters don't know their history, when get's her talking points from AAPAC.
Sharon's party, Likud, also assassinated the only Israeli PM who wanted peace. They killed him for wanting peace and the assassin was set free and then honored as a patriot. For killing their top elected official. Likud = Fascism.
Hillary is right. Deal with it.
Exactly ❤️
I was a young adult recently out if grad school during Bill Clinton's administration and very into politics but I didn't even remember about the facts of the near miss on the agreement between Palestinians and Israel until she said it. I remember alot of Arafat being in the news, but not the true importance of those talks. So why would today's Young people have any awareness of or even have heard the name Yasir Arafat? I did not get the sense Hillary was talking down to students at all, just stating facts. Middle East history is not exactly a topic in high school. Students are barely taught American history. You would have to be in an advanced studies program to get a course in international studies. Here in Pennsylvania one of our districts in an upper class area nearly had to cancel its International Studies program because there was backlash about learning such things as the Holocaust and the Palestinian and Israeli conflict.
"Middle East history is not exactly a topic in high school. Students are barely taught American history."
University students take university level history classes which are not the sanitized version you get in K-12. Hillary was catering to the vast majority who only ever went to high school. The university students know more about history than most people, but she's calling them ignorant and you believe her.
However, Bret, is dead on target in his appraisal of Hillary Clinton as a public speaker. That is nothing new and something she has acknowledged about herself for over 30 years.
Its not just kids who don't know American and Middle East history... its adults. We are one dumb group of people due to a terrible education system
Students are actually more likely to know the history than the typical person though. For one thing, they're actually growing their brain. For two, many of them are history majors. Those who are not still take history classes. And if you've never taken a university level history class, then you only know the sanitized history they teach in K-12. The students knew more than the average citizen. And Hillary knew this. She isn't stupid, she's manipulative, which is a whole other thing.
Perfectly said. Just started watching your channel. Thank you for your work.
It's actually nice to see Hillary again, I've felt quite guilty for not voting for her in 2016, and then seeing Trump getting voted in. Seeing her again refreshes my memory as to how much a tool she is and was, and that her arrogance and lack of integrity were a big part in why people like me couldn't bring themselves to vote for her.
...for so long I thought that people like me were the ones that allowed Trump to get elected, but it was actually Hillary and the leadership of the Democratic party who thought they could sell out their base and use the fear of Donald Trump to get us to vote for her, but ended up getting Donald Trump elected instead.
Thanks again Hillary, you let me off the hook.
💯%!💙
You’re still on the hook. You’re just delusional in your desperate wriggling, trying to absolve yourself of facilitating the existential threat that is Trump. Hillary was AND IS a world better than what YOU gave us.
I mean, depending on where you live you did help elect Trump.
Don't get me wrong here, I'm not blaming you for the whole thing, that's insane, but you saw fascism coming and said "Eh, I'll be fine" and did nothing as it came to eat your nation.
But yeah, I agree, Hillary Clinton is the worst politician I've ever seen, and I've seen the monkeys that the GOP put in the house last cycle
@@dafttoolso the dnc didn’t force Hillary on us and then Biden?
@dafttool We had elections in 2018 and 2020 did we not?
Israel's creation in 1948 involved a forceful takeover, effectively displacing Palestinians in what amounted to ethnic cleansing. This began with the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which set the stage for this displacement. The Six-Day War in 1967, initiated by Israel, further expanded its territory, continuing the displacement under the guise of security.
This historical context is crucial for understanding the ongoing conflict and highlights the inconsistency in global responses. For example, while the international community condemns Russia's actions in Ukraine, similar aggressive actions by Israel in Palestine are often met with more subdued reactions. Acknowledging this double standard is vital for a balanced discussion on international law and human rights.
"And they never heard of computers..They don't know about these things"
Sorry, John, she never said anyone was stupid. You are overreacting. She doesn't communicate empathy well but please don't put words in her mouth like Republicans do.
💯
And she is correct
Hillary can't communicate what she does not possess.
"please don't put words in her mouth like Republicans do."
I bet you also think Tucker Carlson is "just asking questions."
@@havable hardly - he's many things, but "just asking questions" is emphatically not one of them.
One problem with John's take that, for example, you don't need to be an expert in guns to want less gun violence or an expert in Middle Eastern history to want an end to the war in Gaza is that calling for a desired end state without understanding how to get there (or how we got here) often leads to bad results and not getting to the desired end state.
An example I hear a lot on TDR/TYT is that we should forgive student loans because having that debt is holding back youth from things like owning homes, starting families, etc. It is a desirable end state that people aren't buried under student loan debt, can afford homes, start families, businesses, etc., no doubt about that, but just erasing everyone's debt with the stroke of a pen, effectively giving people tens of thousands of dollars instantly, would not make make housing more affordable. What do you think happens if millions of people suddenly enter the residential real estate market with tens of thousands more dollars they can access? I'm glad Ana always notes the problem with housing supply, NIMBY-ism, etc. But the "just make it stop/go-away" type of take reinforces Clinton's point. Ironically, conservatives have the same problem when it comes to things like sex education, contraception and abortion bans; as you love to say, that (i.e. just jumping to the desired place) is not how any of this works.
But it's so liberating to be delusional.
This was such a terrible for her to say. Much like Michelle Obama saying young people must be on there phones instead of paying attention to politics. C’mon, Ladies. You’re supposed to be role models for young women. Your insults of the youth doesn’t do it.
What's wrong with putting down the cellphone?
COMPLETE tangent.
The AR in AR-15 stands for ArmaLite. ArmaLite being the company that produces it. If that sounds weird that they'd use AR instead of AL, I agree until I say them out loud and realize (as I imagine they did) that AR sounds so much cooler than AL
The "AR" in AR-15 stands for "ArmaLite Rifle"
Dear god, go away. This train has enough baggage already. We don't need to carry yours again, too
LEARN TO OFFER BETTER CANDIDATES INSTEAD OF YOUR INNER CIRCLE, DEMOCRAT PARTY LEADERS
We need an entire crop of great young people who aren’t part of the political machine. We’ve got a few so far, but we need more from school boards to the White House!
@@denisejohnson7553 That's the problem. The Political Machine controls all the doors. They have to do this guerilla style. But even then, that's still just Party politics. And there's 2 things that aren't in the constitution that have destroyed our democracy and taken over our government: Capitalism and Parties.
A friend of mine posted a meme about Palestinian history...it was a blank wall. I just dont know how to feel about that. It infuriated me for some reason.
I would love to see Hillary sit down to talk with these "ignorant" youth and then watch while laughing hysterically as they thoroughly embarrass her. She'll never do it, of course, cause she never does anything that is completely planned out.
How would they embarrass her? By talking like a NPC?
Hilary did Bernie dirty and he STILL endorsed her…she can kick rocks
And then she continued to attack him and his base during the general election because she forgot she was running against Trump. World's worst politician.
What I know about the middle east tells me that I am not qualified to come to any concrete conclusions on the middle east. I do know this, the governments in the middle east are all right, while simultaneously all being wrong. How to sort that? Beats the heck out of me.
Distraction.
Talk about the war or walk.
people don't know nuthin' not computers not history. ever find yourself thinking these politicians, these politics. i don't think they're for me? i feel disrespected and taken for granted? hm. we should do something about this
Correction of Clinton's statement on negotiations: "Gosh, if only the Palestinians would accept a non-sovereign, non-contiguous state controlled by Israel, then the Palestinians could have had a state!" The Camp David proposals, and the subsequent Clinton Parameters, were joke. The Parameters were vague for the Palestinians, and nothing specific was subsequently provided. And the Camp David proposals would have granted Palestinians the appearance of sovereignty, except when the Israelis didn't feel like it. All the negotiations revealed is that a two state solution isn't viable. Clinton can go pound sand.
Two state is viable, but not with a phony plan she presented as a good deal.
I think what she was trying to say is that if they knew a little more about the history and the tactics, those kids might be protesting Hamas for intentionally sacrificing those citizens.
Hamas was founded in 1987. The conflict began decades before that. Hamas "sacrificing" citizens is just gaslighting. It's Israel that is killing all those innocent civilians.
Omg…. It is not that young people don’t know about Middle East. It is many starting knowing more about it now against all the engineering you tried to apply on what people should know
Do you really need to know the history to want people to stop dying needlessly?
But how else will you people pretend to care and virtue signal?
To be clear, she is saying they are ignorant of history, not stupid.
She didn't bother to clarify if that's what she meant, and that's yet another reason she lost. She also kept attacking Bernie supporters long after the primary instead of trying to get them into her camp. She "didn't need those voters" apparently.
When you have access to the information, but choose not to look up thst information, you're stupid, not ignorant.
No
She didn't say they are stupid. She said they don't know that they were offered a statehood and said no. Now... Do they know this???? Do they?? Because maybe it's true "They don't know"
If she didn't say they were stupid then Tucker Carlson is "just asking questions." Either apply the same standard to both sides or stop pretending you have standards.
"She said they don't know that they were offered a statehood and said no."
In diplomacy offers get rejected all the time, as a strategy to get a better offer. She's a diplomat and knows this. And then she told you this and you believed it. You don't know, but you took her word for it. Meanwhile, those students were going to school *to learn.* I love how you assume that because the majority of this (uneducated) country doesn't know the history that people who are bothering to educate themselves also don't know. I can't remember which logical fallacy that is, but it is one. Its kind of like saying "most Americans don't know plumbing" and then using that statement as justification to say "American plumbers don't know plumbing." It was propaganda and you fell for it. Hillary was catering to the uneducated majority, not to the students who knew better. This world would have been a better place if Hillary had never entered politics. If she hadn't run for president, we'd never have had a Trump.
Who cares what Hillary Clinton has to say?
"I have had many conversations with a lot of young people"
PAHAHAHA NO THE FUCK YOU HAVEN'T 😂😂😂
Who are these people still inviting her on TV? It's wild she's more visible in the last couple months than the vice president has been in the past 3 years.
Hillary is as out of touch as you can get.
Walter Guinness
Nakba
USS Liberty
Yigal Amir
"Ethiopian women in Israel"
"Zelenskyy's Jews indigenous people of Ukraine law"
Shutup Hilary
Bipartisan statement: whatever you do don't take a drink every time she says "uh"
what … the palestinian’s turned down statehood … a real meaningful state … give me a fucking break
maybe, maybe not.
Look at that bitter, fake smile.
Rissian interference..
You're so funny John. How in hell did Hillary lose? Her college class must have been insufferable
Thanks for Trump Hillary
I blame the people who voted for Trump and the delegates who voted for him despite the people voting for Hillary
And she was a politician? The ahm, palestinensians ah, have ahm, ah, not taken the ahm, deal, ah that my, ahm husband, ah provided, ahm.
Still... better than trump. Sadly.
Hey, she's not perfect, give her a break!
Get outta here, user-gi8pkuc7q! If that's your REAL name, Hillary.
No
We just need to go back in time.
If Hillary is "merely stating facts" then Tucker is "just asking questions." People should either reject propaganda or embrace it but don't let me hear Hillary apologists complain about Tucker because Tucker fans and Hillary fans all fall for the same logic fallacies. Never mind, complain about Tucker. But recognize that Hillary pulls the same crap.
I’m re-posting this comment because the first response I got was, indeed, hateful. 😂
-
In all fairness, 20 year olds who do not explicitly study the Middle East really do *not* know much about the region's history. And yes, if Arafat and Israel had played nicely together there would be a Palestinian state. (And now I brace for a volley of hate comments.)
The Camp David negotiations in particular reveal how completely unworkable a two state solution is. It would have been easier to navigate through an Escher painting that navigate through the two states.
@@Bramble451
It’s unworkable in either a one-state OR a two-state situation. They’ve got to want it to end. They don’t. Thank you for expressing your position politely - there’s been a shortage of that lately. 😔
I love this idea that because most Americans only know the sanitized history from K-12 that university students taking university level history classes don't know history. Well, I don't really love that idea, its just a figure of speech.
The only conversations Hildog has had with young people has been while's she's drinking their blood....
Oh I'm sure she talks to her daughter's elite friends from that prep school where the children of elites are taught that they are better than everyone else.
There is a difference between stupid and uninformed, and she said they don’t know. She did not say they were stupid.
Kidding yourself that this series of events doesn’t depend on the history of this region is not realistic. Neither side has a monopoly on tragedy and neither side has clean hands when it comes to crimes against humanity. Both sides drag that history with them at all times, which is why the situation is complex beyond imagination.
I'm way more I'm favour of voting democrat than Republican however I believe alex jones when he said Hilary is a lizard.
Hey Hillary--where were YOU during Vietnam??? College kids were smarter then, in 1960's?? JFC
Back in the day of Vietnam women didn’t serve in the military but come to think about it where was Trump? Oh yeah, he was getting daddy to pay off corrupt doctors to say he had bone spurs and off having his own personal Vietnam of unprotected sex..
When did the US have the best education?
In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States had the best-educated young people in the world, or pretty close to it
@@traceyhall1097 Then the attack on Public Schooling started under Reagan, culminated with Bush's "No child left behind" fiasco!
@@traceyhall1097 I think Lynn was pointing out that in the 1960s Hillary was a volunteer for Barry Goldwater's campaign where he ran against the civil rights acts but somehow thinks she's a unifying figure not a polarizing one.
@@traceyhall1097 Its true. Our education system was the gem of the world and other countries were copying us. And then Reagan came along and convinced the middle class that their kids would be better off if we defunded the schools.
How is it when she is telling the truth that she is wrong. What she said was exactly what happened. If you would haven't just showed a snippet maybe you would have got the whole thing she really said. Just because you guys have always hated Hillary doesn't mean she is wrong.
Her bouce has changed some
She lost because she had a private opinion and a public opinion.
Oh yeah, "that's" why she lost......
She won the poplar vote of Americans.
@@ajlebeau What about the pine, oak, and maple votes?
@@ajlebeauTake away California and NY, and what happens to her popular vote?
"THIS" is why we got Trump folks. 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Poorly educated people are why we got that grifter fraud known as Trump.
Very well said. Spot on the both of you.
I normally enjoy and learn from this channel, but...WOW! The entire video was uninformative and just a bunch of purposeful misrepresentations of both the graduate and Clinton. This wasn't a "Damage Report" is was just "Damage".
...and yet you cannot point to any specific that this video got wrong.
She’s terrible
Except they are ignorant. Yelling "I am hamas" says it all
Thank you.
White people dressing like them is so edgy though.....
She's trying to complete this sentence "Palestinians did ___ in the 1990s, therefore Israel can kill children today." and there's just no completing that.
That’s not at all what she was saying. You just put words in her mouth. Words of vicious genocide. You don’t make incendiary statements like that without a direct quote, preferably with quotation marks. And yet you put quotation marks on bs you pulled from your own crack.
I liked Hillary better when she vanished into the wilds of New York after losing to The Orange Menace.
Except for that short bit right after when she blamed Bernie for her loss.
Cause the man didn't campaign hard enough for her.
After doing more campaigning than her.
@@aaron101889 And then blamed Berns for her failure even though far more of us turned out for her than her supporters turned out for Obama. There was never a Bernie movement to "not vote for Hillary" like there was Hillary's PUMAs in 2008 who just flat refused to vote for a black man because he wasn't white.
Did you just say Hitlery Clinton?
Wow. Hillary and I actually agree on something. Go figure.
I enjoy this moderate show telling both sides with humorous sarcasm, and true facts.
You think that the offer they were given was both sincere and generous?
Cause I have news for you, not really
"We want to give you your own land........................"
this woman should never crawl out from under her rock, she leaves a slimy trail of PR wreckage whenever she does
I'm sorry, but I disagree with the premise that Israel is responsible for the war. Disregarding the historical context and religious animus, for which there's plenty of blame to go on both sides. If we just look at the current conflict, Hamas invaded and kidnapped citizens, and that was the cause of the current conflict. That is not to say that Isreals inhumane response is justified, just that there is blame enough to go to both sides to single out one side as the primary side responsible for it all. It is fundamentally untrue and hyperbolic.
You can't disregard historical context. Oct. 7 didn't just pop up out the ether. As for Hamas's actions on Oct. 7, there's that uncomfortable historical context that Netanyahu's Likud party was funding Hamas specifically to support it against unifying with the Palestinian Authority, which would have helped to promote a two state solution. Oct. 7 was, in part, paid for by Israel. Also, while the Hamas attack was an act of terror, Israel is responsible for its reaction, and it is using Oct. 7 as an excuse to commit ethnic cleansing/genocide. Terrorism is never an excuse for genocide.
@Bramble451 Then, even considering the historical context, the systematic Jihad waged against the jews historically, places enough of the blame directly at the feet of Hamas to definitely make the " one side is to blame" argument beyond hyperbolic to the point where it is jut a lie.
@Bramble451 if you gain some reading comprehension skills, then read what I've written again. You will find that I never said that Isreal was justified or even blameless. Likewise, neither is Hamas. The Jihad is a religious doctrine of genocide.
@@daobill1 Look into the history of Hamas. They were started up by Israel to act as a counter to the PLO and divide Palestinians between two groups. "Divided they fall". Also Netanyahu told members of his own government that they should support Hamas to stop FATAH from becoming the main voice of the Palestinians. Oh, AND Bibi went to Arab states begging them to give money to Hamas to keep them going.
If Israel wants to go after supporters of Hamas/terrorism, it needs to take out it's own government.
@@daobill1 "the systematic Jihad waged against the jews historically"
That's in response to the systematic genocide waged against Palestine since the Balfour declaration. When you are being genocided, you have every right to fight back.
She is 100 Percent CORRECT. She's not running and does not need to placate fools
Truth!
Good thing Hillary isn't running, she stinks.
John she's not a politician.
"I have had many conversations . . . with a lot of young people over the last many months now." Oh yeah. I definitely belief that. Hillary's always out there, in the wild, listening patiently and open-mindedly to the opinions of people she holds in utter contempt.
That´s the MTG go to. I talked to MANY people all over the country, and they agree with me. Problem is to many people suck that kindergarten level lie up like open bar free beer day.
She teaches at Columbia.
She must mean her daughter and elite prep school kids.
@@bijou3000 "She teaches at Columbia"
And yet she still thinks that the people taking university level history classes "don't know the history."
@@havable Oh my God, do you mean people who are in school are there to learn what they don't know already? TRIGGERED
Politics is a MURKY career choice.
It is all about deals, aka compromise. Those that entered with a "do good" passion have either had unfortunate "incidents" occur or "adapted" to survive and maybe deliver a fraction of the original benefits to the people.
War is PROFITABLE. Period. Ask Bush and Cheney. Civilian deaths, collateral damage.
Look at Ukraine. Putin has targeted and leveled cities; civilian targets. White but Slavs,making them an acceptable element of collateral damage.
As far as the Arafat's "No", she's right. It is available to read about. There's also a documentary too, I think.
The America, as a country, has not faced war on its own soil since the redcoats and the Civil War. The general population has not experienced any invasion nor the destruction of US cities. Life goes on as normal while American troops fight "over there".
Besides, victors write history. Americans, as a whole, are very mollycoddled and clueless about real poverty or hardships nor value what they have.
Stop saying "uh" omfg
I thought she would have been a good president
She did not call them stupid. She said they do not know the history of the issue. That is true. Most people in our country do not know the history of the issue, nor much about our history. Okay, we get it. You hate Hillary Clinton, and Bill. We get that you think she is the worst politiican on the planet. (Um really?) We get that you take every opportunity to hate on her. Way to lose your credibility with me. Apparently you forgot that she won the popular vote in 2016 so at least some folks think she is a good politician, appreciate her intelligence, knowledge, and experience. Maybe you also did not know that the right began to smear her decades ago, to ruin any chance of her being president. (And that some on the left joined in, helping to do the dirty work.)
Except she is being disingenuous about the peace deal and she is being condescending about us not knowing history. She's been there for half of this so that leads me to think she is basically lying for her overlords (they sure af ain't mine).
Walter Guinness
Nakba
USS Liberty
Yigal Amir
"Ethiopian women in Israel"
"Zelenskyy's Jews indigenous people of Ukraine law"
"She did not call them stupid. She said they do not know the history of the issue. That is true. Most people in our country do not know the history"
The fallacy in your logic is where you assume that because "most people" don't know the history, that the people who know enough about it to be angered and protesting don't know the history. They knew her spin of the history and also know that the peace deal died when Likud killed the Israeli PM who wanted peace. So she called them ignorant while lying about history. One way to lose an election is to insult people whose votes you depend upon. But if you want to seal that deal, you have to lie about the history while saying they don't know what they're talking about. And yeah, she was calling them stupid. She didn't say the word "stupid." But she said they did not know the history. And now you're here claiming that because *you* don't know the history that the students who were studying university level history at that time did not know the history.
Most historians agree that Israel is in the wrong here. The settlements are illegal, the blockade of Gz is illegal and as the oppressing force, Israel did NOT have the right to "defend" itself against mostly women and children.
So people who read up with an open mind, like students, will mostly come out on the side of the Palestinians. That's why her argument is at best ignorant, but more likely, a lie.
Pretty rich to hear a lecture on out-lefting each other from a network whose entire premise is that they're more left than almost any sitting Dem.
Distraction.
Talk about the war or walk.
"from a network whose entire premise is that they're more left than almost any sitting Dem."
I'm pretty sure you're confusing this network for Jimmy Dore and Krystal Ball, those Russian Nazi symps.
We don’t need her she should stay home shhhhh Hilary.
She's doing everything she can to get Trump back in office, just like 2016 when she made so many unforced errors one could be forgiven for thinking she was a Trump campaign operative sabotaging her own campaign.
Hillary is not perfect, by any stretch, but by god, this continual lashing of Hillary for flaws is senseless. Trump is even worse by so many degrees.
She was slandered and swift boated for years and it had the intended effect. It even rubbed off on some of the liberals.
Arafat walking away from the table in 2000 was a shame. But it was also, according to a lot of the observers at Camp David, inevitable. Several of Bill Clinton's negotiators and ambassadors and other personnel who were present have since admitted that the deal was clearly designed to give Palestinians almost none of what they wanted except statehood. Several of them said they would have walked away, too. She's not wrong about the events of that meeting, but it's just ridiculous how the US government has such a selective memory when it comes to history. The current party line is: "Nothing ever happened in the Middle East before October 7th, 2023 when Hamas started the hostilities, EXCEPT in 2000 when Arafat ended negotiations for no reason." But nothing else happened before or in between those events." It's the exact same playbook they used after 9/11 to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Including how both governments knew about the threats, did nothing to stop it (in Netanyahu's case, he actively supported the threat financially), then used the ensuing violence as an excuse to invade. And anyone who disagrees with or questions any of these actions "wants the terrorists to win" or is "too stupid to understand."
Her arrogance is one reason why I voted for Jill Stein.
So we can blame you for Trump. Thanks for a steaming pile, David. 🙄
@@dafttool don't blame me, blame the dnc, they're the reason I'll be voting 3rd party this time as well.
@@DavidFischetti-zs8hw 🙄 voting third party IS throwing away your vote. And yes, worthy of blame if things go to hell. Fortunately, I think it’s going to be an even bigger blow out than last time. So whatever.
@@dafttool yeah that's why biden is trailing in polls because it's going to be a blow out,
You blue crew members are as delusional as the trumptards
You would think she had learned from her deplorable statement years ago.
Was she wrong?
The MAGA Cult includes nazis including the KKK, Holocaust deniers, pedophiles like Jesse Waters, most of the violent members of the public, people who make monkey gestures at black people - sounds pretty deplorable to me.
@@molasorrosalom4846 No she wasn't wrong but she forgot the first rule of being a politician which is keep that crap to yourself and express it in private where it can't be used to make you look like a jerk. Its called being "impolitic" which is a dumb way to be if you're trying to be a politician. She also spent that campaign catering to moderate republicans but once she started insulting her would-be voters' friends and family she lost them. When you're trying to cater someone's vote you don't insult them, you don't insult their friends, their family, their church, their social group, or anything else that might cause them to pull the lever for your opponent. She'd have been better off not trying to get GOP votes in the first place but then she's a rotten politician who has no clue about anything.
Epstein history Hillary. Shed some light there.
i don't think a lot of voters wanted a female president. poor reason to vote for trump.
They didn't want a woman who couldn't understand why the invasion of Iraq was based on deception and lies and would end up a disaster for both the Iraqi people and the poor bastards who were forced to fight it.
And here come the excuses......
@@lurx2024 I didn't want that but I voted for her anyway. I did so even though she was still insulting me and every other Bern as last as October of 2016. And I still resent her most ardent supporters blaming me personally when they would not have voted for Bernie had it been the other way around.
@@havable Well if that is the case you are probably a better person in many respects than I am, but I became very impassioned by the invasion of Iraq and how the whole establishment had become committed to it. I saw Clinton's vote for it as a kind of personal betrayal, since I had supported both her and her husband for eight years during the craziness of the Republican assaults from Newt Gingrich. After that time I suffered from "Clinton fatigue" and started to become aware of the fact that not all of the things that both Bill and Hillary had been accused of were completely meritless, and I was slowly distancing myself from them and the "centrist" revolution that had transformed the party. But Hillary's support for the Iraq war, and the Clinton' machine's assault on Howard Dean's candidacy (who I thought could honestly lead the country away from the madness that I had been witnessing in the media) was the final straw for me. While I don't particularly like her and her husband anymore, I do recognize that she is a very intelligent and accomplished person who works very hard for the people that she represents (although she does seem to have surprisingly poor political skills consideringly that her husband was possibly one of the greatest politicians of all time, and while I see him as being corrupt, I still find something quite likeable about the guy. That probably describes something wrong more about myself than about Bill or Hilary. In that respect I kind of blame Hillary for not being as likeable and possibly being more honest than her husband, which also possibly explains something wrong about my judgement as well.
A little to honest for you?
Insulting does not equal honesty any time any place.
@@meandyouagainstthealgorith5787 If you are an apathetic uneducated voter hearing the truth might sound like and insult.
@@danrichards2554funny how she sees young people is how the rest of the world sees all Americans
@@nonyabusiness366 true and not surprising
@@nonyabusiness366I’ve seen too many segments of “man on the street,” where random people can’t identify George Washington, even when they’re an elementary school teacher. That’s a college educated educator not knowing the simplest of historical facts.
She is right about them not knowing about the history of middle east.
Prove it.
As a matter of fact, how would you know?
She seems to have a pretty selective memory about it.
And still, because china doesn’t want us to even recognize it, we forget about the Uyghurs and the 100k+ children Russia has stomped on. Or even Darfur 2k24… I’ve yet to see a video from “the fairest” or have a conversation with a young person that believes these things exist… but, only Palestine could be divisive enough to disrupt America further. Thus the younger people that use TikTok (most) won’t have exposure to these other, arguably much bigger and potentially more internationally destabilizing genocides and wars… we are all so super screwed… We’re are all just Clinton, to close to the trees to see the forest…
Do your BILLIONS of dollars/bombs/taxes/highest-tech weaponry/tuition fees go to uyghur camps, putin, sudanese murder forces?
...or do they go to israel, netanyahu, israeli murder force?
"You are responsible for what YOU can control...to the extent that you can control it." - N. Chomsky.
"And still, because china doesn’t want us to even recognize it, we forget about the Uyghurs"
I didn't forget, but speaking of which there were as few gigantic protests about that as there are about Russian bombs daily landing on Ukrainian apartment buildings for two years and not a peep from the protest crowd. Its almost like you can be Chinese or Russian and butcher civilians and get a pass.
@@homertangler9529 "Do your BILLIONS of dollars/bombs/taxes/highest-tech weaponry/tuition fees go to uyghur camps, putin, sudanese murder forces?"
No, but the Phony Left spending two years criticizing Biden for not letting Putin genocide Ukraine like Stalin did in the Holodomor sure makes them seem hypocritical about right now. Be clear. Do you not want dead civilians or not? Because the Chomsky you're quoting there has been very clear that genocide is *just fine* when Russia does it. I used to love that guy until he went full blown Nazi with his support of Putin and Russian white nationalist fascism.
You talk about "Truth to power"?
She spoke the truth.
How many Americans can pass a US Citizenship test?
There's a series on the History Channel called 'The Men Who Built America' which I think should be COMPULSORY for HS students to watch and then pass a test on.
On the 'Tonight Show', Jay Leno went into the public and asked these two 20 something females,
"Who did we fight against in WW II?
After much hair twirling and giggling their answer was....drum roll
"Canada".
Any thoughts, John?
"How many Americans can pass a US Citizenship test?"
Probably not very many but its weird how she singled out the youth vote, which dems depend upon to win, to skewer and dismiss as ignorant. Its almost like she was working for the Trump campaign there.
She's senile. I'm trying to give her an excuse. People aren't gonna care about what Yasser Arafat did. He's one guy and not every one else who suffered.
Also, the peace deal on offer was basically this: "Palestine, surrender to Israel, and then maybe, just maybe, decades from now if you still exist you might get some land."
@@havable too bad it wasn't the choice of the general population of Gaza. Most of the negotiations for peace are performative anyway. So some prick can come back and say we offered.