Lord Monckton: Net Zero Emissions - The Costliest Error of Physics and of Economics in History
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 кві 2024
- Talk given by Lord Monckton at a meeting of the Oxford Mises Society.
Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, has held positions with the British press and in government, as a press officer at the Conservative Central Office, and as Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s policy advisor. He was educated at Harrow School and Churchill College, Cambridge, where he received a B.A. (Classics, 1974, now M.A.), and at University College, Cardiff, where he obtained a diploma in journalism studies.
Monckton joined the Yorkshire Post in 1974 at the age of 22, where he worked as a reporter and leader-writer. From 1977 to 1978, he worked at Conservative Central Office as a press officer, becoming the editor of the Catholic newspaper The Universe in 1979, then managing editor of The Sunday Telegraph Magazine in 1981. He joined the London Evening Standard newspaper as a leader-writer in 1982. After a hiatus in his career as a journalist Monckton became assistant editor of the newly established, and now defunct, tabloid newspaper Today in 1986. He was a consulting editor for the Evening Standard from 1987 to 1992 and was its chief leader-writer from 1990 to 1992.
He was Special Advisor to Margaret Thatcher from 1982 to 1986, and he has served as Secretary for the Centre for Policy Studies's economic, forward strategy, health and employment study groups; Deputy Leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP); and as UKIP's President in Scotland. On leaving 10 Downing Street, he established a successful specialist consultancy company, giving technical advice to corporations and governments.
He has travelled the world giving speeches about climate change and appearing on national radio and television. His 2010/2011 speaking tours to Australia attracted a lot of media attention and he was invited to give a personal briefing to Tony Abbott, who at the time was leader of the Opposition and then subsequently prime minister.
He has testified four times before the U.S. Congress and has spoken at United Nations climate conferences in Bali, Bonn, Copenhagen, Cancun, Durban, Rio, and Qatar.
His lecture to undergraduates at the Cambridge Union Society on climate change was released as a feature-length film, called Apocalypse? NO! He has triumphed in debate at St Andrews University, where undergraduates voted against climate alarm for the first time at any British university, and at the Oxford Union, where undergraduates voted against climate alarm for the first time at any English university.
Lord Monckton has authored numerous papers on the climate issue both for the layman and scientific community. He established in a paper for the World Federation of Scientists that CO2 has a social benefit, not a social cost. He was also a co-author of the paper that showed the claim of “97% scientific consensus” about climate change to be false (link.springer.com/article/10.....
His scholarly articles on climate issues have appeared in numerous books as well as such journals as Science Bulletin, Energy and Environment, Journal of the Marine Navigation Industry, UK Quarterly Economic Bulletin, Physics and Society, Science & Education, and AIG News.
For his work on the climate, Lord Monckton, who was Nerenberg Lecturer in Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario in 2013, has been presented with numerous honours, including the Meese-Noble Award for Freedom, the Valiant-for-Truth Award of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, the Santhigiri Ashram Award, and the Intelligence Medal of the Army of Colombia.
In 1999, Monckton created and published the Eternity puzzle, a geometric puzzle that involved tiling a dodecagon with 209 irregularly shaped polygons called "polydrafters". A £1 million prize was won after 18 months by two Cambridge mathematicians. By that time, 500,000 puzzles had been sold. Monckton launched the Eternity II puzzle in 2007, but, after the four-year prize period, no winner came forward to claim the $2 million prize.
Monckton is a liveryman of the Worshipful Company of Broderers, an Officer of the Order of St John of Jerusalem, a Knight of Honour and Devotion of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, and a member of the Roman Catholic Mass Media Commission. He is also a qualified Day Skipper with the Royal Yachting Association, and has been a trustee of the Hales Trophy for the Blue Riband of the Atlantic since 1986.
Recorded at Corpus Christi College, Oxford on 12th October 2022.
0:00 The case against net zero emissions
1:03:16 Historical background to the net zero agenda
Could you imagine the impact this would have on people if it was put into a 3 or 4-part documentary that was shown on the BBC, or indeed one of the other mainstream broadcasters? Millions and millions of people would start to wake up and realise the scale of nonsense we are being told. So many people's lives would be made better as we could then spend the people's hard-earned money on better housing, better roads, better medical care, better legal systems etc. With the latter, we could pursue the people who instigated a certain medical intervention that happened a few years back too.. The lid is starting to come off.., but sadly I fear that documentary will never get made.. 😑
Corporate media would never allow that to happen!
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
Monckton is an ignoramus regarding science.
It won't be shown on mainstream media because his thesis doesn't stand up to scrutiny
@@stevejones2310 it would seem to me that the person who refuses to ask are we certain of that is the ignoramus. The sun doesn't orbit the earth. Yet long ago that was such accepted 'science' that the powers of all of society worked to keep people from questioning the 'science'.
Science is not some fixed body of knowledge.
@@stevejones2310Kindly provide a rebuttal, or at least a link to such. One suspects that his voice carries more weight than your own at this stage especially since you chose to start with an ad hominem.
The Post Office scandal which is growing further proves why we should not believe the establishment concensus
Monckton is about as establishment as it gets wtf are you talking about?
@@nickbarlow4270you missed the key word, consensus
theportal.wiki/wiki/The_Gell-Mann_Amnesia_Effect
He goes against the establishment grain
@@acidthunder1 wrong establishment. He's of the hooray Henry brigade looking for conspiracies within conspiracies (Russian dolls), classic 'politics', land owning classes.
NetZero tries to address the 3% of man made CO2 which is included in the 0.04% of CO2 in the atmosphere. The man made contribution is irrelevant and even if zero would not affect the climate one iota. But the damage being done by NetZero and climate alarmists is huge.
Patrick Albert Moore actually thinks the world was dying before we started burning. All of this carbon trapped in oil and coal contributes to a greening of the earth over the last 175 years. Essentially we need to find the right balance of fossil fuels to continue for centuries. Burning it all now is going to cause problems later, but it is not upsetting the Earth. Humans think in years, the Earth transforms in millenia. 1000x scale.
Truth👍
The human contribution is 0.0012% of CO2 in the atmosphere.
As you say, nothing human beings do will ever alter the course of climate. Might as well try to reverse tidal patterns while we're at it.
All about power and control and a bit of money maybe,
The United Nations has exempted Russia China India Africa Tibet and certain third world nations from having to keep the regulations so what Hope of net ZERO ?
Lord Monckton’s presentation was outstanding. If he videoed it in one session standing it is remarkable for a person his age. Much respect and thanks.
Sacrificing the poor middle class and jobs for a dishonest agenda. A great video!
This explains why US/UK economies are ever more struggling, even though many families have two good professional careers earning higher salaries which only service higher credit debt (average houses cost x9 average wage), ultimately meaning they are cash poor. The next generations will be worse off, unless families can financially bootstrap their offsprings into the housing market.
Notably since 2010 the BRICS + alliance (global south) has recognised the peril of the US hegemony and the developed global north economic decline, and have long since opted out of the 1971 Petrodollar USD agreement (to use the USD reserve currency). With a $37 TRILLION deficit any turn away from the USD reserve currency could crash the US economy via uncontrollable US inflation; in contrast only making the economic gains by Russia and China ever more valuable.
In case you fucking haven't looked recently, hate to bother you with FACTS, but the US is doing quite well, in part because of the biggest spending on non-carbon power production. All you got is bullocks about "hegemony" and "developed global north economic decline" which HASN'T occurred.
How do you sleep at night lying to yourself?
@@primafacie6442
Now not blocked thanks to Elon Musk
Brilliant. Helps with my own fight. Was roped into the 'sustainability' committee at work. This will help me give the other side of the argument. Boy, will they hate me.
They’ll hate you because it’s a religion to them and gives their lives meaning. If they were actually worried, they would receive the information with relief, not derision and spite.
Sure, but don’t forget sustainability is a real and important thing beyond climate change and other green washing. Air, water, soil pollution etc., are real and amongst the most important issues we face even if climate change isn’t a problem and even if plastic recycling is largely BS.
Be strong
You can get everything you need at the co2coalition.
The disrespect we give our planet is one thing but climate change is something completely different.
He needs to stand on the WEF stage and tell them what for!
Tell them that he's got a degree in Classics and a night school diploma in Journalism. Gee, you really back the "biggies" don't you, eh? He does a pretty good Marty Feldman impersonation though...
The WEF doesn't have power. They're a distraction.
You don't need to be a genius to totally debunk global warming. It's a scam and has always been a scam. They've said over and over that it wasn't real, they're just going to use it to bring about the new world order.
Remember in 1989 when 98% of climate scientists said that the coastal cities of the world would be depopulated by year 2000 because of sea level rise?
A science has to be able to make accurate predictions. Otherwise, it's nonsense.
@@ceeemm1901 You stick with Greta the infant, Al Gore who was looking for a pension, Sadiq Khan who was looking for power and money and Prince Charles who was looking for a justification for his existence until his mother died. They really are the 'biggies' .
^^77 Brigade BOT ALERT^^@@ceeemm1901
Who realised it would cost so much money to make the planet ever so slightly worse off?
Ever so slightly!!!!!!??????????
Not in our house, it's more like the ice age!
It makes me wonder that either EU politicians are absolute idiots (then its our fualt as we as society rised and educted them) or enemies of our culture (then it is also our fault because we voted for them). Conculsion: stupidity has its cost.
The people to whom the money was paid.
Communists who did this to us all on purpose..
1000 view after a month compared to 16 million views for puglie pig and a pringles pack animation.... shows where we are going.
Alphabet would never lie, would they?
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
the overwhelming majority of people hate learning.
Entertainment. ENTER; get inside, TAIN; occupy possess control, MENT; the mind! They've been doing it for decades!
@moopius You make a worrying point. I think the attention span of many people is becoming shorter when faced with the need to concentrate and inwardly digest what is being said. Amusement is preferred before learning and acquired knowledge. Fertile ground for the slick propagandist.
Net zero is about as reasonable as a perpetual motion machine.
It works the same way as a perpetuation motion machine... Imagination.
In the interest of the scientific spirit I must point-out that deaths due to temperature increase or decrease is not the same as physical infrastructure damage due to weather extremes. We know technology and increasing affluence have allowed people to weather ( no pun intended) temperature extremes but it could be argued that weather effects are nonetheless, more destructive and costly than before.❤
@@arctic004It COULD be argued. But is there data to support that argument?
@@arctic004I think your argument is irrelevant.
perpetual motion downwards. Its the locking out of social mobility by the upper classes.
I had forgotten how eloquent Lord Monckton can be. Thank you.
I love his humility coupled with high english. True pleasure
Listening to this lecture is one hour and thirty minutes of time well spent. Thank you.
did it reinforce the bubble?
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
@@-LightningRod- Did it reinforce yours?
@@andylewis7360
buddy if you don't see how well MrMonktons nonsense has aged, ..it hasn't aged well friend.
Then you are just not being honest with yourself, and your delusion is Yours to enjoy.
@@-LightningRod- Still nothing specific. Refute ONE of his points
Can we educate someone from Oxford on the very basic manual focus control of a camera lens?
This is a good example of why the western world will soon be totally broken. Someone has plugged the camera in set it up on auto and forgot about it. The era of excellence is well and truly over. Brain fade seems to have set in everywhere. The cause? Mercury in fillings? Pesticides in foods? Fouride in water? Processed food?.... How about this one. The older a woman has a child, the lower the IQ of the child.... Women are having children later and later....
Impossible
Perhaps it was done intentionally to discourage viewers
An AI was in charge of the focus
Really it's the words that count. Brilliant exposé of the net zero scam.
Whenever someone says the science is settled I instantly assume that person is not a scientist. Particularly when the prediction is based on a computer model.
They do like playing with their models dont they?
I assume the opposite. Unfortunately, my confidence in scientists has decreased significantly in the last few years.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Indeed!
@@P________Twain....
I hope some of our up and coming young graduates went off and did their own research with an open mind after witnessing this brilliant lecture.
I weep for the Western World when our elite universities can't work out when to turn auto-focus off. Lord Monckton as usual was at his best.
I find it laughable to believe that they should not know to turn autofocus off so here's a very easy conspiracy for you ,one that doesn't need much of an imagination and that is it was deliberately left on to create a problem in watching the whole thing,so losing the amount of views. I never said the conspirators were clever because if your getting this feed your probably already more than every interested in this subject and know who lord Monckton is and if you were prepared to watch a 1 1/2 hr talk that you will do so even with this fault. That me.
Agreed! But at least the sound recording is almost passable
yep, it is a podcast (may as well be ...)
I wondered why the picture kept moving in & out.
Very annoying autofocus.
Someone in the audience doesn't even know the difference between the Jet Stream and the Gulf Stream. Shocking for someone at Oxford University.
Not at all... They're taught to be parrots. They reject all thought which is contrary to their indoctrination.
Remarkable mental clarity and coherent chain of thoughts, backed by figures and science.
ua-cam.com/video/fbW-aHvjOgM/v-deo.htmlsi=hPU27aWwEvjpCfjW
Munckton talks lot of rubbish
@@Margarinetaylorgrease Learn to spell
@@Michael_Arnold Never, my spelling is as reliable as Mukton’s facts. I get bits wrong and miss out important bits.
@@Margarinetaylorgrease
What's the most important error he makes?
I am playing this in the car for my son to hear.. he is the generation that has been brainwashed into thinking we are heading for a climate catastrophe. I recommend all parents play this talk to their children and grandchildren
Would be interesting to know the outcome, as fear usually has a stronger hold than reason.
@@davidwolff4696fear is the mind killer.
As I tell my own kids. When I was doing my Bachelors in the 1980's the big scare was we were about to enter another Ice Age. Then a few years later, during my Post Grad Dip, it was the Ozone hole would melt the ice caps and destroy humanity. Mmmm neither happened. Now for the last 2 decades we've had the ACC doom message. Justifying massive energy price hikes and increasing government controls. Strangely non of the predictions made by Al Gore and his mates have come true either. Now I am seeing a pattern perhaps??? 🙂
Again and again and again: brutal speech of Lord monckton May he be blessed.
He lies
ua-cam.com/video/fbW-aHvjOgM/v-deo.htmlsi=hPU27aWwEvjpCfjW
Only 2K views? This is one of the greatest eye openers I've ever seen.
Well then you're being bamboozled by this man's suave performance. He argues that the Russians invented climate change because one defector said it was probably so. That's not a very broad basis on which to build an argument.
Alphabet lies ...
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
@@wheel-man5319I think you’ll have to be a bit more specific than that.
14k views in one year, but then if you have a room full of university science students brainwashed into thinking there is a crisis, what chance do you have of getting the global sheep to listen to something for and hour and be able to follow this, people believe what ever they are told in the MSM. Look at the C-Vid policy now. People are still sold on it and will do no matter what. They can't think for them selves.
One of the very most informative videos I've ever seen.
He lies
ua-cam.com/video/fbW-aHvjOgM/v-deo.htmlsi=hPU27aWwEvjpCfjW
Look up Tony Heller for a daily dose of similar facts presented by a Los Alamos (US national laboratories) scientist.
As a layman who remembered his schooling, ive done some research in past few years, this makes sense to me. Couple it with a depopulation agenda and if we halve c02 we in deep troubles..short term financial gain long term command and control..I was recently berated by an almost 15 year old for my observations, however the young lady in question was unable to identify the make up of the atmosphere. What we actually breathe she thought it was oxygen and carbon dioxide 😮
Not only the 15 year old. There is a UA-cam video around where a farmers representative in the USA asks a panel of people responsible for climate change policy what they thought the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere was. None of them had a clue. They guessed between 5 and 10%. The actual figure currently is 0.04%. These are the people who are deciding what to do about fossil fuel use. Lord help us.
@@tom5216 exactly 💯 👏
If we halve our CO2 output we dump at least three billion people into starvation... Shades of Mao and Stalin would be jealous.
When YT, the UN marks something false, you can bet on it that it is truthfully content.
If only our Politicians and the BBC would listen to these words of wisdom and TRUTH. We may not continue to slide into the gutter.
They know. They are at war with the British people, signing global treaties that damage our country but by bit as has been evidenced in recent years. This is not by accident. The global institutions like WEF and WHO and World Bank are led by totalitarian minded individuals who want to capture the West and make money through control. WEF Leader Klaus Schwab has admitted on record that he has trained leaders to infiltrate national parliaments and rise to the top. He specifically mentioned Macron, Trudeau, Merkel, and British leaders among others. They all sing from the same songbook.
MAGA-ON Dude!
Well said Lord Monkton , it's long overdue time to debunk the global warming myth and the hatred of CO2.
Tony Heller has been debunking it for over 30 years.
It is not a hatred of CO2. It is a hatred of humanity driving this.
Great content badly filmed.
There are growing voices in the world saying exactly these things, that make so much sense to me. Hopefully the message will land shortly.
I grew up near the Clyde shipbuilding back in the 70s/80s, and I highly suspect that was another of the planned obsolescence of the militant unions along with the car industry and the mines. Needless to say the towns around the Clyde have never recovered from it, and generations have had an otherwise prosperous future stolen from them.
My counterpart in Prague early 90s had been trained in Moscow, and what I discovered from him mirrors the comments highlighted towards the end of the presentation.
Frighteningly, the second part of the presentation was the most important. I do have questions though but no one to answer them.
@@RedHotscot An intriguing comment, no doubt. Thus I would appreciate you providing them, so that they may be analysed, or pondered upon.
One question stands out above all others. Being that the west is the best customer China and Russia have ever had, what would be the point in communising it? Not that Russia is a communist state, we may not like the democracy it operates, but 140 million Russians seem quite happy with it. They are free to leave if they don't like it.
Then there's the question of Nordstream 2. Whodunnit? The best tale the west can come up with is that a few blokes in a pleasure yacht conducted an attack on a concrete encased pipeline designed to resist ships anchors. This following Biden's sinister promise to do something about it.
And why would the BRICS nations embark on creating a trading platform for non US Dollar Reserve Currency when they are infiltrating the west anyway?
There far too many people still living out their Cold War fantasies. I like Chris and admire the work he's done over the years but he needs to drop the Reds under the Beds narrative.@@gianfrancobenetti-longhini8192
Wow this guy really lays it out I never believed in climate change but that and the rest of the stuff it's just mind-blowing. The part about Russia and Ukraine is so insightful.
here's an example of why the CO2 isn't a problem: turtles
Turtles have been around for at least 230 million years, their gender is affected by the sand temperature in which they lay their eggs - hotter=more females, cooler=more males, 55 million years ago, C02 was between 1000 ppm and 4000 ppm, temps were, allegedly, at least 10 degrees Celsius hotter - but they don't have a way of directly correlating temperatures, they can only extrapolate based on other data which is only correlated in isolation, that is, they don't take all the conditions into effect.
Apparently turtles are still around.......and fish, mammals, etc. etc. despite the apparent ocean acidification, ocean and air temperature increases, toxic CO2, etc. etc.
This is an absolutely astonishing brief. It really needs to be broadcast everywhere.
Lord Monckton is very well informed and exhibits remarkable objective analysis.
I have long known about the war set out to destroy the West but didn't know to what extent the big players had entangled themselves in our world.
I know about climate change, the misconceptions and distortions and had wondered about the so called 97% of consensus of scientists agreeing, and where that had come from. It also explains a lot of the scepticism held in Australia for fossil fuel climate links.
One thing always puzzled me about prominent scientist with the BBC when he holds up a graph and you can never see anything on it but he's always struggling to hold back laughing whilst he's trying to say here's the evidence and 97% of scientists agree.
Stranger still that the actual figure that pointed to some existence of a link actually amounted to 0.3% of those 11,944 scientific papers and not the 97% as claimed but then 97% sounds a lot scarier than 0.3%, so if you want people to fear what's coming and convinced them that you can save the planet, if we only took action, they could save us. Many people would be prepared to pay whatever price needed to do it, given that the planet was going to boil, if we did nothing.
Statistics are great for politicians, as even when the stats don't support their position, they still say what they want you to hear.
When have any group of people agreed 97 percent yes about anything?
@@d53101Absolutely. If you see a figure like that you know there's something unusual and needs to be rechecked until it can be fully explained.
We have replaced state monopolies, with privately controlled, foreign owned power mononpolies.
They told us comunism is bad...now we have neo liberal capitalism and corporative politics. Meaning population always in debt trying to survive as modern slaves.And they are still pushing for debt debt and more debt.My childhood was in Yugoslavia socialist country and only time I remember the life was normal, people were also normal. Now live in Switzerland and the whole life here turns around money and debt which I luckily don't have as I learned to live with what I have. Consumer society and debt society is all it is left from the collective West.
@@The_Touring_Jedi same here in Canada, but the westerners do not know another way of living. the west bombed Yugoslavia, what was not possible to imagine in nightmare dreams for us, I worked with women from that country and could not understand at that time( I did not know what happened) why they were so strange.
Well I have been trying to understand the reason for the anti fossil fuel zealots for years now. I have proven to myself CO2 is not causing anthropogenic climate change…I assumed it was just a replacement for religion…..but this explanation makes far more sense.
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING. GREENIES are against HUMAN IMPACT.
You have wilfully denied the reality to yourself. This man is a snake oil salesman
Certainly does, in line with Uri Bezmenov’s information about the ways in which Russia’s secret service operate to undermine western countries.
You haven't proven anything to yourself. You've allowed yourself to be mugged off.
@@stevejones2310 If you want to persuade people you’ll need to refute the claims. Otherwise you’re just pissing in the wind, polarising a dispute when surely you should be seeking the truth.
Brilliant lecture. Thank You. Everybody please share this video, please.
Tabg
more like shady
Why would you want me to share lies and misinformation like this?
@@allanwilmath8226I understand that you still support the position that the earth is the center of the universe, and everything rotates around it.
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
Amount of deaths because of global warming =0 Amount of millionaires made by declaring global warming =millions.
If only every Professor/Teacher/Scientist/Doctor/or other.., would deliver their information/knowledge or teachings like this..! Imagine that!🤩🤩🤩🤩
No politics and no propaganda!
Just facts and evidence firmly and calmly delivered.🤩🤩🤩🤩
Thank you so much!🤩🤩🤩🤩
Amazing speech.
Why, on this subject matter, does UA-cam feel the need to add a ‘Context Note’ at the start ? UA-cam does not put Context Notes on other current issues.
Anything that goes against "the agenda" gets labels to try and make it appear as fake news
The United Nations "Owns the Science on Climate", according to the United Nations. It also owned the science on COVID-19.
Our unelected Globalist government telling you this person is spreading misinformation or disinformation 😂😂😂😂 which actually means pay closer attention to it, as likely it’s even more factual than the IPCC.
The narrative must be defended!
Remember that the $1 billion per millionth degree isn't just 'spending', but it goes into someone's pocket. It doesn't just vanish into thin air. It's another transfer of wealth. Where would that $400 ($800) trillion go? Lots of greedy middle-men on the way.
The real effect is man hours required for a level of wealth & wellbeing.
If it takes 100 times more man hours to produce all the stuff we currently accept as normal it means eventually we will enjoy 1% of what we currently have for normal working hours & effort.
We will be going back to the middle ages, everybody will need land & plough pulling horses to stay alive. Getting enough food will be an astounding triumph.
Many years ago i heard this man speak but i did not listen. I thought he was a dobey ideologue who was being used by vested interests to mislead and deceive the public to ignore a clear and present danger.
Many years later I was staggered by how much I was mislead by my government the media and so called science.
I can only praise this man for his dogged determination to reveal the facts against enormous odds.
My apologies Mr Monckton
Fascinating talk
A clear case is being made - by this excellent speaker - that we will not face a mass extinction, shortly, due to climate change. But this video does HINT THAT WE WILL become extinct due to HYSTERIA INSTEAD.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO LISTEN to this important vidoe lecture.
Holy cow that cameras constant auto focusing is brutal!
The creme of this generation’s students, cannot even get a camera to work.
R
everything about this dude is fuzzy
@@-LightningRod- Be specific, or it is you being fuzzy.
@@iamhudsdent2759
Lord Moncton is a F57KING clot and a beacon for deluded people to obsess over,
really just a wasted soul attempting to be significant again by being obviously wrong with intent.
@@iamhudsdent2759it's very fuzzy. No actually it's scaly, like a dragon!
Last year in American Congress they said co2 levels were 0.03 percent, they said if it fell to below 0.02 per cent that all plant life would be threatened
Very true. Though I think (iirc) that currently the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is 420ppm. But yes 200 ppm co2 is dangerously low. Again iirc plant death occurs at 160 ppm (oh you can no longer breathe either) thus we're actually at a dangerous low ebb of CO2 in the atmosphere.
the very definition of science is experimentation testing then observation. science is not constant.
I wish my public speaking skills were up to those of Lord Chris! Thank you Sir! Ramaswami needs to have a conversation with you.
Vivek is singing of the same hymn sheet.
Yes a coalition of common sense on climate to get us back to spending our money and resources wisely. Instead we have a coalition of Kami Kasi communist con artists leading us to destruction.
My goodness, more power to Lord Monckton in his endeavours to bring common sense and real facts to the climate hoaxery
@@McNamara0723Actually Vivek is singing from Fossil Future, by Alex Epstein. Not that Alex Epstein disagrees with Lord Monkton.
This is the most professional, common-sense video on the so-called climate change I have ever seen. Shame it was marred by amateur camera operation which, by constantly going in and out of focus, was a strain on the eyes.
It didn't bother me 'cause i just listened to it. From my phone.
Good point@@JYRIVIRMA
The people that insist on net zero never, to my knowledge, compare the trade off vs efforts that would mitigate the effects they predict. This flies in the face of credible economic analysis and demonstrates this is not about scientific rigor but to enforce consensus to the benefit of grifters in business and authoritarians together with anti-western regimes.
Wouldn’t zero emissions require that all of humanity stop breathing?
You get the prize for the most trenchant comment of all.
Something like that 😂😂
Less carbon dioxide equals less plants equals a drop in oxygen equals bad for forna ad infinitum.
That poor kid at the beginning “as a physicist, I’m going to parrot Al Gore”
😂🤣
Monkton done well not to rip him a new one. 😂😂
Excellent ! I wish more germans would see it
the conversation is great, but the production values -- audio and visual - are irritatingly poor. Very happy Lord Monckton continues his crusade.
Astounding information delivery skills.
I’m not sure what to think of the Russian meddling, but the climate stuff 100% I concur.
Brilliant presentation
He lies
ua-cam.com/video/fbW-aHvjOgM/v-deo.htmlsi=hPU27aWwEvjpCfjW
Theres always some Russians doing stuff to do with something or other.
Other than that Net Zero needs cancelling completely regardless.
@@Paul-Nicer58 interesting is that in Russia they say the same about Britain, there is even a proverb there.
@@ludmilaivanova1603
Russian proverbs & sayings are often lovely, I need to find the saying about the British.
I wonder if any of these Oxford students think differently after this lecture. 🤷♀️
How very refreshing to hear a well educated person speak the truth!
Existential threat to bureaucratic budgets.
Tell me where he is wrong? There isn't even any correlation between CO2 and climate change, let alone any probably causation.
This was one year ago and nothing has changed, in fact, it's gotten much worse as tyrants see the great opportunity inherent in "disaster" control.
Thank you, Lord Monkton, for sharing your research and for your common sense.
My argument with all this climate change insanity has been, why, if we are in such a crisis, are governments world wide not working tirelessly to preserve our rainforests?
Are these trees not our global lungs? Do they not clean our air?
Do trees not need the C02 to survive and then in turn, do they not produce the oxygen we humans and other life forms need to survive?
This is what we learnt in school. Does this fact still apply? What has changed?
How come this very interesting video has been viewed by so few? Or has UA-cam done some algorhythmic trick? I did click on the thumb up icon, but the number stubbornly remained at 980...
Alphabet lies.
Nuclear power is the only viable option to fossil fuels, as it is not dependent on the weather and can be built out at a reasonable cost, as has already been proved by France and Sweden.. It would not only avert any potential climate catastrophe, but clean the world's air as well and prevent ocean acidification.
I don't think he makes a compelling case that climate change is not a concern but I think the question of whether we can do anything about it is extremely important for us to ask.
Did you fall asleep? 😴 I thought he made a much more compelling case than those who say it is an existential threat. The idea has been planted in the minds of many without freedom of thought and its foundation is fear. It used to be called global warming but it is now climate change so it can broadly apply to anything. Now every event, from forest fires to floods is deemed climate change in the U.S.
But I wonder, how many years must pass before a conclusion can be made? As it stands, as the wild predictions and timeframes pass, the can is kicked farther down the road.
Was you listening to bill and Ben whilst we were paying attention to the actual facts, "you don't think" is where you should have left your little statement.
@montysmythe579 the onus is on you to make a compelling case for your minority position. My ears are open. Hotter is better than colder is a little too simplistic for me tho.
If you were engineering an engine and said 50 deg hotter will be more thermally efficient without accounting for other factors you will probably have a very efficient much improved engine...for about 2 minutes
@@boatbutch Really? Where is the compelling case for the majority position? This sounds like a guilty before proven innocent argument. It's not always a good idea to jump on the bandwagon just because a bunch of people said so. There is a common phrase "science isn't done by consensus". Furthermore, I'm not sure if we're talking about climate change, or climate change by CO2, because they are very different notions.
And lastly, I see yet no one has answered the question I posed among the comments.
Correct. His facts and charts are all to be challenged and his assumptions are just that.
Now what are the comments from Spain and Portugal. Agricultural regions entering their fifth year of drought. Parts of north Africa...again their 5th year of drought. That's the real world. They don't care about the back and forth of the comfortably placed you tube viewers and even less for the oil bought and paid for fake Lord. Some communities cannot take the gamble ....they won't have the luxury of being able to look back in time to see who was right or wrong and you won't be getting your produce from abroad. And crops worldwide do not like higher temps. So everyone will be affected .
Very pleased to hear the correct side of the net zero scandal!
Overall during the 140 year period from 1880 till 2020 the temperature of the climate increased by 0.8 degrees C. From 1880 to 1950 the temperature rose by 0.45 C, but the CO2 level only by 18ppm. Then from 1950 to 2020 the temperature rose by another 0.35 C but the CO2 level increased by a further 100 ppm. So if 18ppm CO2 was the cause of that 0.45C rise, then surely the temperature should have increased by 2.3C from 1950 to 2020?
Simplistic
Shhhh! Stop trying to be so analytic!
The problem is that you're assuming a linear relationship between the warming ability of CO2 and the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. I'm pretty sure that CO2 has a log rhythmically decreasing effect of heating the atmosphere. Thus going from 250 ppm to 260ppm had more effect than going from 350 to 360 ppm, thus each additional ppm causes less heating than the next ppm.
@@wheel-man5319 it's not logarithmic, it's exponential. The warming trend is precisely the opposite of what you say
@@stevejones2310 Dr William Happer and Dr Willie Soon as well as Dr John Christy have all published research that supports that conclusion.
But even if they hadn't I've been watching the catastrophists for fifty years and exactly zero of what they've predicted has come to pass. When I was younger I hadn't made the connection that all of their recommendations increase the power and scope of government.
I'm with Thomas Paine, government is at best a necessary evil.
He connected dots that are eye opening
Great man. Very grateful to Christopher for all the help he gave and offered me in fighting the new loony left climate change alarmists at my further education institution. Thank you, Christopher. Audi alteram partem!
A splendid, brave mind, with extraordinary eloquence.
I am probably the only working person in the country that thought M Thatcher was amazing. The UK would be totally different if she were here !!!
I'm no brain surgeon, but two things bother me. 1. All this ground being taken up on setting up Solar Panel farms. This takes away huge amounts of land that are needed for food production and farming. WEF/UN Agenda solution? Depopulate. 2. Even with full production of their alternative methods of wind and Solar, there is no way that every household, manufacturing and commerce could be fuelled this way. Then add to that the power drained from the system to charge the EV's. WEF>UN Agenda solution? Depopulate, concentrate the remained into small hubs and BAN private car ownership. And this is just a simplification of the Elites wishes.
Their wet dreams are crushing and it will all end in chaos which Elites will feel also on their skin.
"In the future you will own nothing and be happy" - Klaus Schwaub (found of WEF). The goal is to get the population down so that they can own even bigger amounts of land, as well as control where you move and what you eat. The end goal is world enslavement, at least as far as what I can see.
You so right. Also..... Then once all this solar infrastructure is built how are they going to store it for the night time electricity requirements, winter time needs when no power is produced, full days.....
Correct in every regard.
If you want to see scary, read ...... WHO New Pandemic Treaty. And IHR ammendments.
If our countries governments around the world don't act to get rid of these WHO proposals and they just let them slip silently into place, then we're all in big problems for future. Check it out for yourselves.
I often hear that solar panel only work during the day and so we cannot have electricity during the night -- but electrical energy can get stored during the day into accumulators and restituted during the night.
I am not necessarily supporting solar panels -- I did not make up my mind yet --- but I certainly hear arguments which are not thought through.
It's worth checking actual generation on a typical day in, say, January in the Northern Hemisphere, the winter months yield very little electricity; but no worries, the grants given by the taxpayers cover ALL of the losses for the generating companies............... You will find that the business model for any of the unreliable/unrecyclable schemes are totally fraudulent......
Please make your own calculation. In terms of needed nonelectrical energy (heating, processes in industry, transport...) and needed electrical energy per year for your country.
And than calculate what wind, biomass and photovoltaic produces in one year.
And you will see, that at the moment there is a huge gap what alternatives contribute to the overall needed primary energy.
Nationwide you cannot afford to store the needed energy even for day to night (let alone winter summer).
On the other hand as a household (single house) in germany, you could properly come through the winter for heating with an oversized solar panel roof (lets roughly asume 40kWp)
1 day in December from 1kWp you harvest= 1kWh
good isolated 140m2 house one day in december for heating=10-20kwh
So you have 40kWh per day, 20 for heating, 20 for your household needs (car not included).
With a small batterie and sufficient hot water storage you are some kind of autonom (bc you must calculate that there are days, where harvest is nearly zero).
Costs from 50.000 Euro up.
cheers
And how do we store it? All the lithium is in Afghanistan .
@@chrischristie1486 No it's not, most of it iwas thought to be in Australia until recent discoveries of vast reserves in North America, but lithium is even found in sea water so it's almost everywhere. Eletricity has been stored since the 1960s with pumped storage hydroelectric. These days Lithium batteries are good for grid sabilisation with storage for around two hours but for longer term storage (4-8 hrs) vanadium redox flow batteries are proving to give the lowest cost over their lifetime.
I have always thought that the best place for solar is on domestic and factory roofs only. In fa t wrote t government suggesting they make them standard on new houses, that was before they decided to build 5 million new houses, so not much luck there.
I can’t believe a student of physics doesn’t know about the logarithmic relationship of Co2 and also believes it’s toxic?!?
Miseducation....
The following question is important, but mis-framed -- what is the proper response / solution?
"If the summation of all wise decisions in a market is so much more powerful than an individual decision-maker, how is it that a single decision-maker can develop a plan to exploit weaknesses in those markets to achieve geopolitical power?"
"If a collection of individual drops of rain is so good to drink, how can a single person contaminate it?" is probably a good analogy to start with.
You could also emphasize that free speech -- the ability to expose plots like this, and critically think through the consequences of government policy -- is a necessary component of freedom as a whole, even as free markets are.
This was an amazing presentation. Thank you! Many in America are fighting to share the truth.
Excellent lecture.
"Bless their little cotton socks" is my favorite quote.
How many know the fact the grapes were growing on "Hadrian's wall" in roman times (of course)?
But my hockey stick graph shows that global warming is going to kill us all... Oops I tuned in to the Michael Mann channel.
The arithmetic at 43:45 is wrong:
(260+27) / (260+7.5) = 1.073 {not 1.077}
Also, why '260'? If the intention is to convert to kelvin then the correct addend is 273.15.
Then the sum is
(273.15+27) / (273.15+7.5) = 1.0695
Well spotted. I wondered why his translation of the degrees C to K, the obvious way to handle temperature, was only referenced as “the sun is shining”. But nonetheless a brilliant talk from the good Lord (pun intended) debunking the climate crisis agenda. Also the political eye-opener in the last section. Bravo!
This is one serious assault on the very fundamentals of the climate con.
Just brilliant
Excellent
Brilliant! Thank you for the clarity!
For anyone that has lived in the deserts such as in Saudi Arabia, will doubt a great part of the "greenhouse" story. WHY? because of the big difference between the day's temperature and that of the following night, having to wear extra clothing. We had shade temperatures of 52° C during the day, causing us to pour structural concrete only at night instead, with a MUCH lower air temperature. The sun is still the primary cause of heating, as can be seen with the changing seasons in areas that are further towards the POLES.
I wonder how air polution by aircrafts which fly daily in thousands have impact together with sun heating(radiation). Most of the people don't realise that an average Airbus320 consumes 1500liters of kerosene on take off. Number of aircrafts daily since 1990 had exploded in the skies flying daily. Since 1990 the weather has changed indeed.
@@The_Touring_Jedi According to you, what is the composition of the pollution from Jet Aeroplanes, and at the same time how much of the sun's rays are blocked by the vapour trails that the aircraft produces at cruising level. Please let me know what are the credentials to your credit to evaluate pros and cons on the matter, so at least I will know that you are not the typical keyboard warrior.
@@The_Touring_Jedi the thing is that the issue is too complex and not only number of planes play the role here. Therefore, speculations are very easy to make since no one I suppose has done a thourogh and independent research on the topic.
Excellent talk! Even know I am fully aware of the climate con . The history and knowledge this gentleman has is truly fascinating.
Regarding increased yields from mechanisation and use of fertilisers, pesticides and gm crops. We should also look at the increased health issues resulting from increased toxification of our environment. But agree we shouldn't dismiss increased yields due to increasing co2, it clearly plays a role.
“ *_I'm in the US and I've watched this play out in real time literally my whole life (nearly 60 years) There has been a shift in the hearts and minds of the working class of all ethnicities across the planet. People are no longer afraid or intimidated. We will not be made to feel guilty for our inalienable rights. The camel's back has been broken, the lion has been unleashed. We've been patient long enough, tolerant enough long enough, lied to long enough, and taken advantage of long enough. It's over but the crying_* ”
Wow, absolutely amazing information, it needs to be presented on mainstream media as a documentary. It should also be shown in High schools and Universities as compulsory viewing instead of the global climate change hysteria that is pushed down students throats. It may be long, but it’s the best presentation I’ve watched in many years.
Thanks Lord Monckton. The Heartland Institute also provide good factual information.
Excellent presentation that is sadly under viewed
Excellent lecture. Such a shame about the camera work. I had to listen to most of this with my eyes closed.
That's to perhaps get your attention ....enlarge video pause it and repeat on a few places this man/being is not fully human ...
YES THATS R RIGHT ANIOHER SHIFTY ONE .
That was excellent!! Many thanks 👏👏👏
Fantastic truth on ( GLOBAL) WARMING! Thank you for your efforts.
Very good!
god and phoney
Wow...this leaves me simply stunned.
stunned like,...stunned?
Alex Epstein 's "FOSSIL FUTURE" on sale now.The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. HUMAN FLOURISHING
@@-LightningRod-If you don’t agree, refute the arguments.
@@andylewis7360
Sorry, his facts are not facts friend, the actual data refutes MrMonktons ridiculous claims
@@-LightningRod- Show me or you’re a Russian bot
A very interesting talk and just shows how gullible the Western leaders are.
We need more intelligent people leading us not the dummies we have now.
This should be made into a TV show maybe people would tske more notice.
So pleased that this person is still speaking out to the next youths in our nations.
The miners' strike started when it did because Thatcher had appointed Ian McGregor - who had just shut down the steel industry - as head of the Coal Board. He announced mass pit closures, but did so early in the year, thus provoking a strike in Spring, the worse time for a coal strike. Scargill wanted it in October, and Thatcher's move anticipated his plans.
McGregor decimated the steel industry but he didn't shut it down, as you claim. If you're going to try to be factual, stick with the facts, don't mess around with them because you're upset about how you think it was played out.
There is always a lot more to matters than appear at the surface. Scargill was a guest of the Russians and many leaders of unions have frequently enjoyed free trips to Russia, all expenses paid. You might want to consider what was in it for the Russians given how little industry we have left, here in the UK.
It was also Michael Heseltine who was responsible for shutting down the pits, another fact you overlook and nothing to do with McGregor, as you claim. He did it because of the action taken by the miners against Margaret Thatcher for whom he held a deep respect, even when they were on different sides of an argument.
No entrepreneur wants to be held to ransom by a union, however well meaning they might be.
@@JustTakeAMoment I concur. I was born and raised in Scunthorpe, all of my family worked for British Steel. It was a strain on all levels, the steelworkers supportive strike was unofficial, the families had to support them. Yet Scargill was considered a saviour! Thatcher was the evil, intent on ruining the industry. Such is indoctrination.
Precisely. She avoided another Winter of Discontent by forcing Scargill’s hand because she knew what he was up to
A very interesting lecture. Assuming this information is correct, why doesn’t anybody ask questions? Why don’t our governments anticipate or at least adress/discuss this information?Why are the masses in the West so silent? Who’s actually in controll? What are the answers here?????
They've been captured by the CCP.....
I was pretty convinced about the climate hoax before but found it difficult to explain why. The lecture has been an eye opener in many ways. Thank you