Is the 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz BETTER Than the Ford Maverick?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
  • The 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz is an urban adventure vehicle, built for light off-road, and fuel-efficient. The Santa Cruz is built in the USA. We test drive it and show you all the details and what you need to know. Watch out for 2022 Ford Maverick and compact pickup trucks.
    We show you everything you need to know, score it in 10 categories with Car Coach Reports ratings before you go for a test drive. If you have additional questions, put them in the comments below and I'll be happy to answer.
    0:00 Is the 2022 #Hyundai Santa Cruz BETTER Than the Ford #Maverick?
    1:23 Under the hood
    1:56 Performance
    4:16 Handling
    6:25 Safety
    7:04 Visibility
    7:51 Seating Comfort
    9:40 Technology
    11:03 Features
    13:21 Design
    16:54 Quality
    17:29 Value, price & cargo
    19:40 Car Coach Reports Total
    20:16 Comments and questions
    ⬇️. Check out our new podcast on all platforms:
    Total Car Score ► www.revolverpodcasts.com/show...
    with Lauren Fix, @KarlBrauer, and @JavierMota.
    ⬇️ Social media:
    Twitter: ► / laurenfix
    Facebook: ► / lauren.fix.the.car.coach
    Instagram: ► / laurenfix
    MeWe: ► mewe.com/i/laurenfix
    CloutHub: ► clouthub.com/laurenfix
    ⬇️ Website: CAR COACH REPORTS - car reviews, expert advice, and Car Smarts:
    ► www.CarCoachReports.com in English and Spanish
    ⬇️ Get My Book: ** Lauren Fix's Guide to Loving Your Car ► amzn.to/3ifDi3j
    ⬇️ Free Monthly Newsletter - Car Reviews & Saving Secrets: ► bit.ly/3k0P0AS
    ⬇️. See more Car Coach Reports
    Auto News & Car Reviews - www.carcoachreports.com
    Breaking News ► / laurenfix
    Auto Education ► carsmarts.com
    His Turn - Her Turn™ Car Reviews - histurnherturn.com/
    SUPPORT INDEPENDENT CREATORS
    The Fix Family has taken generations of passion, pride & automotive expertise to create unique auto products & books that will keep you, your family & cars safer and running better for years to come.
    ⬇️. Thank you for SUPPORTING US: / carcoachreports
    ⬇️ Our Gear ► kit.co/CarCoachReports/our-st...
    Music by subscription: Epidemic Sound
    ©Automotive Aspects, Inc., 2021. All Rights Reserved. car expert #cpmpacttruck #truck #SUV #Santacruz tfl alex on autos car wow truck
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 296

  • @ChrisPollard
    @ChrisPollard 2 роки тому +9

    I think it was a pretty fair overall assessment on the Santa Cruz. There is SO MUCH to like about this vehicle - especially the way it drives. At no point does it ever feel like you're driving a truck. I finally got to test drive one last weekend while waiting on my order to arrive. (Ultimate - Canadian equivalent of the Limited, Sage Grey) I primarily need a solid commuting vehicle that can pull some truck duties in the evening/on the weekend and is low enough that my wife can get in and out of it without struggling. This ticks every box for me.
    I'm sure the Maverick will do very well for Ford, and probably out-sell the Santa Cruz by a fair margin. It just looks cheap and boring by comparison, and the interior isn't somewhere I want to spend 2.5 hours of my day 5 days a week. The Santa Cruz is on a completely different level on the inside.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +1

      The Santa Cruz will have a more powerful engine. Maverick is going to be delayed with the chip shortage. You made a good choice! Thanks for your comments

  • @kenro-96
    @kenro-96 2 роки тому +11

    Excellent review as usual Lauren. I ve been looking forward to seeing more info on this. Very practical and useful for day to day activities. Ill be interested in how this stacks up to the maverick in relation to price point.

  • @marcusturner9896
    @marcusturner9896 2 роки тому +4

    Nice review keep up the good work

  • @josefermalino461
    @josefermalino461 2 роки тому +2

    As always awesome review😍🚙

  • @bruin4937
    @bruin4937 2 роки тому +2

    Really good review, thank you! Liked and subscribed.

  • @klasseact6663
    @klasseact6663 2 роки тому +5

    I love your satellite station choice Lauren, I'm sure that guy you made go "bye bye" a couple weeks ago would've liked that, LOL😆

  • @danmillercrna
    @danmillercrna 4 місяці тому +1

    Best review of this vehicle I have seen. Many complain there is no volume knob but it has a volume control on the steering wheel. I have always had Hondas. I have a 2020 CRV which I think is fine but I could not believe how much better the ride was in my 2022 Santa Cruz. What I call a Cadillac ride.

  • @markperry762
    @markperry762 2 роки тому +1

    Keep bringing it Lauren. Safe travels.

  • @troy9er
    @troy9er 2 роки тому +6

    I remember seeing this when I was selling Hyundai’s. Glad they came out with it! 👍🏻 Bet that 2.5 turbo go’s pretty nicely. I’m retired now but am excited to see it in person. My 2015 Elantra has a Check engine light on. It hasn’t had one problem since day one. Of course now that it’s out of warranty the light came on, figures. SMH, all I have had to do to it so far is oil changes, new tires, front break pads, wipers, and a main battery. 60 K miles and this is the 1st problem. Probably a oxygen sensor. I’ll have to take it to my Dealer. Luckily they are the Best! I worked for them from 2010 through 2015. Before that I sold high end luxury cars for 15 years. This store really impressed me with their service. They always had top CSI #’s in both sales and service. Try em out, Pugi, Hyundai in Downers Grove, Illinois. Tell em Darryl sent ya.

    • @dougn2350
      @dougn2350 2 роки тому +3

      I would think O2 sensor is covered under engine warranty.
      I had two Elantras and no issues up to 90k miles when I traded them off

  • @msbav8r
    @msbav8r Рік тому

    First time seeing this channel, as I'm waiting for my Santa Cruz to arrive.
    This is the best review I've seen.

  • @missbehavin8673
    @missbehavin8673 2 роки тому +2

    The Santa Cruz is built in America and I support that. Will be buying one soon.

  • @garymason7517
    @garymason7517 2 роки тому +4

    Seems like a good choice. You don’t give away high number so easily. Nice looking car.

  • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
    @BOSSYtexasCHICK 2 роки тому +3

    great review Lauren, but can't help but wonder how THIS received a 10 for features and (my) Limited Hybrid Tucson only scored a 9?! My Hybrid Limited trim has every single feature THIS does in addition to Smart Park, memory seats, hybrid engine, rain sensing wipers, power passenger seats, etc..... (and yes i remembered ur "Feature Score" of 9 on my Tucson and was miffed by it but didn't say until now when i see this scored higher...lol) Curious what you think the Tucson lacked when it came to features?! Thanks! Really love ur in depth non bias vids! BTC

    • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
      @BOSSYtexasCHICK 2 роки тому

      @@dwik8740 well maybe so but i was thinking the bed was more an "equipment/utililty DESIGN" where all the things i named above were "features" maybe ur right tho, yes a BED definitely would rightfully raise its score IF that's what she was taking into account : )

  • @robertsawyer89
    @robertsawyer89 Рік тому

    I just bought my 2022 Santa Cruz Limited, and I love it :)

  • @judih.8754
    @judih.8754 2 роки тому +5

    Excellent review. It's nice to see a woman's point of view. I will be shopping for one of these in the spring when availability is hopefully better.

  • @brutustheoldeenglishbulldo8672
    @brutustheoldeenglishbulldo8672 2 роки тому

    Great review!
    I have one on order but I would have loved to have seen this made from the Santa Fe platform 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

  • @Funsho97
    @Funsho97 2 роки тому +2

    I saw one of these on the road just outside Columbus, Georgia before they started selling them, pretty cool to see them in the wild!!! I like it!!!

  • @sidneyhemphill4383
    @sidneyhemphill4383 Рік тому +1

    If I didn't know any better I would think this is a Subaru. I love it.

  • @bonnieson4989
    @bonnieson4989 7 місяців тому

    We just bought a 2024 one and couldnt be more pleased with it. Previously one couldn't get a comfortable ride unless a full size truck was bought. This marks all the boxes in a vehicle we were looking for. Really rides like a car but provides that occasionally needed truck bed. Plus gas mileage is decent. Hyundai was spot on with the timing. Considered the Ford Maverick but its in short supply and the boxy outside design wasn't as appealing plus the addtl towing capacity of the Santa Cruz Limited was higher. Plus the ride quality was so much better in the Hyundai. But to each their own. Purchase the vehicle that best fits you.

  • @OntarioAndrews415
    @OntarioAndrews415 2 роки тому +1

    Does the front passenger seat have any power at all? Does one have to manually adjust it forward or backward?
    Good overall review. Thanks!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому

      The drivers seat is power the passenger seat is not

  • @MrAdavisca
    @MrAdavisca 2 роки тому +2

    Very nice review. Love the vehicle and anticipate purchasing one. I’d like to make one correction the Limited model you were reviewing and the SEL premium do not have wireless Apple CarPlay with their 10.25 displays. These two higher models require wired Apple CarPlay. While the lower models actually do have wireless Apple CarPlay with the 8 inch screens

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +1

      Interesting we were told all wireless, thanks for sharing that. Good info!

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому +2

    So glad this is built in the good old USA Montgomery Alabama 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому

    I put the new K&N filter in my Santa Cruz and it completely eliminated the Turbo Lag . Completely! 😊❤

  • @hunkydude322
    @hunkydude322 2 роки тому

    i seen this vehicle in pictures at the chevy dealer, but really didn't pay much attention who was going to make it, and i thought wow now thats a very sharp looking vehicle, this was a few yrs back and here iam looking at it now woww, i think Hyundai will be successful with this vehicle, i believe the timing is right this time around and plus we needed a drastic new design with these vehicle and hyundai had the courage to do it they pulled out all the stops and for broke, lol God willing iam thinkin of really buying one i have a full size truck but would be nice to have this as a second vehicle.

  • @thereissomecoolstuff
    @thereissomecoolstuff 2 роки тому +4

    Lauren how do you put a camera mount right in front of your field of vision. Good review but man. I think you can figure out a way around that.

  • @rrbhokies
    @rrbhokies 2 роки тому

    I didn't see a button to turn off the auto start/stop. Are you able to turn it off at all? Or does the vehicle not have it?

  • @DV-tc1yr
    @DV-tc1yr 2 роки тому +3

    I have the limited edition AWD grey and love it. Just wish it had sensors in the rear bumper if you come to close to something to alert you

    • @genesisg7022
      @genesisg7022 2 роки тому +2

      Does it come with a back up Camera?
      If yes, why does it need an alert?

    • @clifhellner1493
      @clifhellner1493 2 роки тому

      How much did you pay?

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +2

      It does have a back up camera

  • @hunkydude322
    @hunkydude322 2 роки тому +5

    why is everyone comparing this to the Maverick, no vehicle on earth looks like this Santa Cruz. The rest of the trucks including the Maverick all look alike just the way it is, plus this is a El Camino on steroids for those who have a short memory Hyundai must have looked back at that El Camino and thought to themselves hmmmm.

  • @devilsrighthandman769
    @devilsrighthandman769 2 роки тому +9

    Very comprehensive review of one of the most interesting vehicles I've seen in a while. If you can fit 4x8s in the bed, I'd be interested in one.

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 2 роки тому +3

      Sounds like Maverick, Ranger or Colorado is more for you

    • @RickOhnsman
      @RickOhnsman 2 роки тому +3

      How often do you haul big stuff? I'd say if it's only 10% of the time you might question the need for something bigger. A trailer or bigger truck could be rented for those occasional needs far cheaper than just buying a bigger and less fuel efficient vehicle.

    • @devilsrighthandman769
      @devilsrighthandman769 2 роки тому

      @@RickOhnsman not often, only 5 or 6 times a week.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +7

      Long lumber can be tied down and the tailgate can be set at multiple angles.

  • @PoppaSnipe
    @PoppaSnipe 2 роки тому +3

    I got fully loaded Maverick Lariat AWD 2.0 EB all package except first edition. Added moonroof and full size spare for $34,426.00. And the awd 2.0 EB Maverick get 29 hwy, 22 city, 25 combined. Enough said.

  • @mikeherber8358
    @mikeherber8358 2 роки тому

    I like that i can change color in all modes as i have mine in RED in all modes

  • @lascelles7546
    @lascelles7546 2 роки тому +13

    I like the exterior, it’s a nice looking design.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 2 роки тому +2

      no one on earth has this design, you watch the other car makers are going to copy for sure.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 2 роки тому +1

      for those who have a short memory this is a El Camino on steroids.

  • @opencarry3860
    @opencarry3860 3 місяці тому

    Looks to be a nice rig overall.👍

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 Рік тому +1

    Dunno why, but I REALLY like this Santa Cruz! Try it in 2,5T flavor and AWD! It's a Tucson with a bed..Like the Ford Explorer Sport Trac was 22 years ago. Only much better...unless it's a V8 from the 2nd Gen sportrac

  • @Cheesus4jesus
    @Cheesus4jesus 2 роки тому +3

    The Maverick seats don't look as comfortable, thanks for mentioning the seat comfort. I also like that you get rear seat climate on upper trim levels, not available on Maverick.
    Does the Santa Cruz come with navigation standard or as an upgrade?

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +2

      Navigation is an upgrade, most people use Apple Car Play and Android Auto

  • @kc0lif
    @kc0lif 2 роки тому +1

    i doubt about crossover definitely nice compact truck. similar to subaru baja, ford maverick. good vehicle i like watching her turn.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 2 роки тому

      for those who have a short memory this is a El Camino on steroids , Hyundai may have looked back and seen the El Camino and said hmmm.

  • @stevewierzbicki2495
    @stevewierzbicki2495 2 роки тому +9

    Lauren, Do You know IF we are going to get a Hybrid Version to Compete Against the Maverick, in the future?

    • @marcdinetz8282
      @marcdinetz8282 2 роки тому +1

      i'm a Hyundai sales rep. No Hybrid in the works for now. We have been waiting several years for this beauty to show up at the dealership. The Tucson is available as a Hybrid and a Plug-In is also on the way.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому

    It has hidden kool stuff too ! Like if it gets to Hot In the Car! It cracks the window to let the heat out !

  • @midnight4109
    @midnight4109 2 роки тому +5

    The available equipment is impressive for a small truck. I wonder how the Maverick is going to match it on price. There is finally some serious competition in the small truck market.

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 2 роки тому +2

      seriously - 42 K vrs 22 k for the Maverick? how can you even compre the 2? is this twice as good?

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 2 роки тому +1

      @@h20bearboy65 The law of diminishing returns. the answer is in who sells the most trucks.

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 2 роки тому +2

      @@midnight4109 So Ford has 100K pre orders, how does that stack up to hyundai?

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 2 роки тому +3

      I really hope it sparks even more competition among manufacturers.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 2 роки тому +4

      @@h20bearboy65 I would bet on the Maverick for 2 reasons. The entry level trucker is cost conscious and Ford has done a better job catering to them. They have also led the field since long before Hyundai existed and have an enviable reputation which explains why F- series trucks lead in sales. Hyundai is a smaller company and likely doesn't expect to sell as many though.

  • @stephenhendricks103
    @stephenhendricks103 2 роки тому +5

    Reviewers seem to struggle to categorize the Santa Cruz. Some see it as a short bed pickup. Not really accurate and a description that Hyundai soundly rejects. Others see it as a crossover with a bed. Again misleading, I think. And certainly not comparable to the Hyundai Tucson that's over a foot less in length. The Santa Cruz is even 8" longer than a Santa Fe. To me, the Santa Cruz is more like a (slightly lifted) midsize sedan with a short pickup bed in place of a trunk. It's only about 3" longer than a Hyundai Sonata and in its fully loaded top trim has many of the same bells and whistles.
    As far as comparisons with the Maverick is concerned, from the information available it appears the two vehicles are significantly different. The Maverick is considerably "truck-ier". Not surprising in view of the fact that Ford's lineup in the US so heavily truck-centric. Consumers looking for a truck are almost certain to visit a Ford dealer. If they show up at a Hyundai dealer it's an error. Add the substantial Ford fleet sales compared to Hyundai and there's little likelihood that Hyundai will sell even a quarter as many Santa Cruzes as Ford's sales of Mavericks. But that's not necessarily bad news for the Santa Cruz.
    Although the Santa Cruz is unique in the North American market, it resembles another product sold in international markets (especially in Australia where it's quite popular).The VW Amarok's bed is about a foot longer than the Santa Cruz (5' vs 4'), a difference that makes it about 10" longer overall. Unlike the unibody Santa Cruz, it's a traditional ladder frame utility vehicle with stronger off-road chops than the Santa Cruz and and both 4 and V6 diesel engines. Nevertheless, it projects the same overall look and feel and the "adventure" vibe the Santa Cruz is meant to embody.
    In that context it's worth noting that Australia is an important market for Hyundai. It may well be that the success of VW's Amarok there suggested to Hyundai that a similar concept might work in North America. In any case Hyundai turned over the design of the Santa Cruz to their California design studio to come up with a design for a similar vehicle that reflects American tastes.
    It's also noteworthy that Hyundai chose to put the corporate 2.5L four banger in the Santa Cruz. In turbo form it's an engine now standard or optional in at least 8(!) Hyundai, KIA, and Genesis vehicles and coupled with the 8 speed DCT in at least five. It's appears to be an excellent choice with strong performance and better fuel economy than a V6.
    Is the DCT the best choice for serious "off-roading" ? Not really. But that's not the intended mission of the Santa Cruz. It's a great engine for daily use and for loads that are unsuitable for a sedan's trunk or an SUV's interior cargo space. A couple of years ago in a review of the Amarok I asked why Australians would choose it over an SUV with a similar size cargo hold The answer I quickly received was that coming home with a dead deer in the bed was preferable to sharing it with passengers. OK, 'nuff said.
    All in all, the Santa Cruz is a niche vehicle. But I suspect it will be successful enough to justify Hyundai's investment.

    • @mavfan1
      @mavfan1 2 роки тому

      Thumbs down if you saw how ridiculously long this post is, laughed, and moved on without reading it.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому

    They say they built this for the techies but us Retired folks Love it! I took it to our Car Club Cruz in (no pun ) it drew a nice crowd! Hyundai Own me big for Selling this Vehicle but I have been watching and waiting for 10 years now ! The one thing Hyundai needs to fix it the tow package is about $800.buck not including install cost ! The dealership usely charge $ 100 per hr. This ante no frinkin chump change! And after market is not to be found! I know I looked everywhere! That Sucks!

  • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
    @BOSSYtexasCHICK 2 роки тому +1

    P.S. Sounds of Nature IS there. You can see it at the 10:26 mark : ) BTC

  • @nicholasxayasith55
    @nicholasxayasith55 2 роки тому +1

    I wish it came in better colors. I wish it had a pass-through hatchway between the bed wall and folding rear seats to let you haul longer items. For the price, a cheap- feeling passenger seat - actually ANY seat, is a big fat omission. Wouldn't regular 'ol knobs on the console just BE BETTER than touchscreen everything? For all the clever, weird, nicely considered thoughts put into this vehicle, there's a few things I still wish it had and a few it did away with. At the MSRP, it might be more attractive in 5 years after depreciation. I suppose I could forgive a few things after a several- thousand dollars drop in price.
    Good review.

  • @elol6357
    @elol6357 2 роки тому

    Nice vehicle.
    Could be my next transportation, tired of driving large trucks.

  • @nelsoncopo7529
    @nelsoncopo7529 2 роки тому +2

    42,000$?!?? For that I could buy an f150 half ton!! Thats ridiculous.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому +3

    Thumbs up!! I definitely like the Santa Clause.

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 2 роки тому +2

      That was a good movie too. 🎅

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому +1

      @@wbwayne8887 what are you smoking?

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 2 роки тому

      @@bobdavis3357
      😂

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому +1

      @@wbwayne8887 😂 😂

  • @qkrwnstj0917
    @qkrwnstj0917 2 роки тому +6

    I thought Mavrick would be my pick, but after watching review with exposing structure and material under the hood I was disappointed with the built quality of bare cheap hood panel exposed wiring on it and cheap plastic interior. I liked the interior color scheme of Mavrick though.

    • @seruresto1386
      @seruresto1386 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah, kudos to Ford for pricing it so low, but there were a lot of compromises to be able to do so.

    • @hs5942
      @hs5942 2 роки тому

      Maverick is well designed but cheaply made to cut cost

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому

      The Maverick just won North American Truck of the Year, a very prestigious award

  • @therationalistparty9742
    @therationalistparty9742 2 роки тому +2

    Those wheels spinning backwards though! 😲

    • @marcdinetz8282
      @marcdinetz8282 2 роки тому +1

      It's a visual play on your eyes when the wheels rotate faster than the frames/second of the video

  • @decibellone696
    @decibellone696 2 роки тому +4

    I like this vehicle. good looking and does the job it was built to do well. the only reason I wouldn't buy it is for my purposes the bed is too short and, I'm not a fan of 4 Cyl engines.

  • @BoopSnoot
    @BoopSnoot 2 роки тому +1

    The larger infotainment does not have wireless android auto/carplay, only the base 8" screen does.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 2 роки тому

      back in the 1960's you'd be lucky if you had Am radio installed in the car.

    • @BoopSnoot
      @BoopSnoot 2 роки тому

      @@hunkydude322 IF you even had a car, most of the time you had to walk to school, up hill, both ways!

    • @jimji2774
      @jimji2774 2 роки тому

      That's what they say and they won't be able to fix it till the 2023s. I've never used Android auto so I may not miss it. Still has Bluetooth connectivity and wireless charging.

  • @olesyakoktyan6713
    @olesyakoktyan6713 Рік тому +1

    Good review as usual. But a lot of folks are turned off but the digital HVAC system. What happened to physical buttons? So this is a huge problem for Hyundai in general. Who says the cabin should look like a cockpit of Boeing 747? Underpowered American brands look a lot more appealing despite ridiculous “well the whole industry in moving in that direction” thing.

  • @ibenpishtoff
    @ibenpishtoff 2 роки тому +2

    Well, larger Hyundai dealers are getting in a few at a time, and right on cue, they are jacking up the prices claiming demand reasons. My wife has been waiting eagerly for it’s release, and now her dream vehicle has become monetarily unattainable. What a letdown, but not surprised. Price gouging should be against the law!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +1

      I would suggest calling around to other dealers outside your area. I was able to find quite a few dealers she did not charge what is called, ADM, which is additional dealer markup. Order whatever you want and then wait for your perfect vehicle to arrive. It may take longer than expected but at least you’ll get what you want

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 2 роки тому

      My Dealership in Richmond Va Refuses to do that! They sale on line too ! West Broad Hyundai ask for Tim ! They also gave me very good trade almost what I paid 3 years ago new ! I had a Kia soul turbo plus/ GT

  • @LLawliet182
    @LLawliet182 2 роки тому +5

    I must say it looks really good.

  • @herczeus9341
    @herczeus9341 2 роки тому +2

    Yes it is!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +2

      We shall see - we will be reviewing the Maverick soon

  • @smallnuts2
    @smallnuts2 2 роки тому +1

    Make the payload to 1800. Would be perfect for a slide in camper for cross country traveling.

  • @reivaj1769
    @reivaj1769 Рік тому

    I bought 2023 I love it

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому +1

    Turbo is actually 291 hp and 310 torque! I have one . The H trex is great! 6to 60 under 6 sec

    • @clifhellner1493
      @clifhellner1493 2 роки тому +1

      How you liking it so far? What did you pay?

  • @pbentsonable
    @pbentsonable 2 роки тому

    Really like this but wish it came with better colors.

  • @neubauerjoseph
    @neubauerjoseph 2 роки тому +3

    I think this would be the perfect kind of vehicle for fiat and also VW to have a truck.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 2 роки тому

      VW has tried in the past with little success.

    • @havok3344
      @havok3344 2 роки тому

      These small pickups are very popular in many parts of Asia. VW, Peugeot, Isuzu, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Ford, and Toyota have always sold compact pickups abroad.

    • @neubauerjoseph
      @neubauerjoseph 2 роки тому

      @@midnight4109 well I think people love trucks so it could work.

    • @neubauerjoseph
      @neubauerjoseph 2 роки тому

      @@midnight4109 well its a new day and to say that it wont work not would be silly.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 2 роки тому

      @@neubauerjoseph whether it would "work" is a good question, whether any of those companies will try to sell a truck in the U.S. is a better one.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому +2

    You Tube has a Great factor Video from Sheet metal to tires of the Santa Cruz being made! This is really one helluva little SAV lol Sport,Adventure, Vehicle! A hole new class . Last but not least! It sucks that they only have 4 colors! Ford is going to kick their asses on just that! Ford has some dang nice colors inside and out! But Hyundai has the quality and backs it with a fantastic performance and warranty! When you are retired that's very important I don't care how much money you have! Because our new administration is know for sucking everything you have worked for all your dry ! Get ready and grab your ankles!

  • @fffwe3876
    @fffwe3876 2 роки тому +18

    hands down win for Maverick.

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 2 роки тому

      Butt that Front end

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 2 роки тому +4

      ? with ford reputation and short warranty? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 2 роки тому +3

      @@jrs9264 santa cruz almost twice as much! 100K 8 year drive train warrantee on the maverick FYI

    • @rkerver3
      @rkerver3 2 роки тому +1

      I saw that the Maverick has a cvt transmission, I have one on my Honda Accord which is great for fuel economy but prob not so great on a truck just saying

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 2 роки тому +1

      @@rkerver3 as I understand it, this is a new CVT. It does not use a belt system, instead uses a metal gear setup, so hopefully more robust and requiring less maintenance

  • @76carmel
    @76carmel 2 роки тому +4

    Hyundai won't call the Santa Cruz a truck.

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 2 роки тому

      But my State Register does!

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 2 роки тому

      Called a SAV SPORT ADVENTURE VEHICLE

  • @TheMichaelRN
    @TheMichaelRN 2 роки тому +2

    Hyundai made a mistake selling it exclusively in NA, this would sell well in tropical countries.

    • @OlJackBurton
      @OlJackBurton 2 роки тому +1

      They don't have production for it. It's only being built in Alabama where they expect to build less Sonatas and Elantra due to reduced demand in sedans...

    • @BarefootVlogger
      @BarefootVlogger 2 роки тому +1

      Florida is a tropical country 😎

  • @lailanitaganap2402
    @lailanitaganap2402 2 роки тому

    Is there a Santa Cruise hybrid coming out? If so 50 mpg would sell like crazy the Maverick hybrid gets 42 mpg? The Santa Cruise looks definitely better.

  • @TalismanPHX
    @TalismanPHX 2 роки тому +4

    Lauren, I worry about the durability of the DCT and turbo with towing heavy loads. Thinking that there will be lots of burnt clutch packs with the DCT... Excellent review as always 👏

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 2 роки тому +2

      That's a good point but hopefully the NA/torque converter trans is chosen here, despite less torque. Watching channels like thus gives you car smarts, maybe ALL salesmen should subscribe too💡😇🤔

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 2 роки тому +1

      @@klasseact6663
      Problem with choosing the NA 2.5L and 8spd TC Auto is the towing capacity diminishes. For the full 5K lb towing capacity, you have to opt for the upper trims with the 2.5T and DCT.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 2 роки тому

      @@wbwayne8887 well my buddy and I were talking about this yesterday and concluded that Hyundai did plenty of testing of the drivetrain pulling weight. I know the DCT isn't really the best for towing but maybe there's a tow mode where it doesn't shift quite as fast. Keep in mind this is an automated manual and as we all know there's been stick shift trucks in the past.

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 2 роки тому

      @@klasseact6663
      Good point, and I hope you're right. If I pull the trigger on one, it won't be for at least 2 years, so I will have plenty of time to sit back and observe the early adopters of the Santa Cruz.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 2 роки тому +1

      @@wbwayne8887 shouldn't have to wait that long as it's based off of the Tuscon, maybe a year. I'm sure your not going to push the vehicle past its limits and that's key here. I'm sure it can tow 2 jet ski's or ATV's and gear in the short bed, no problem. For alot of people THIS is going to be perfect👍👍

  • @dougn2350
    @dougn2350 2 роки тому

    Several websites indicate that Santa Cruz is currently the fastest selling vehicle in the US.

  • @nortecusa4046
    @nortecusa4046 2 роки тому +1

    Dumm question. How can you have a scoring system with out something to compair with. I was follow along. My scoring would be much lower. Is there such a thing as a ten 10?

  • @StraightOtohGunga
    @StraightOtohGunga 2 роки тому +5

    Problem is is that the maverick has this thing be on price by a long shot

    • @suavemasky
      @suavemasky 2 роки тому +3

      Two different cars, maverick is a bare bone truck, while Santa Cruz is a luxury utility vehicle. Maverick has 19 percent of the features in Santa Cruz

    • @mark5862
      @mark5862 2 роки тому

      @@suavemasky 19% of the features, that is silly. The XLT version has everything I want and I personally think it looks much better. The Santa Crus screams Subie Bratt. If you like that look great. The Santa Cruz has nothing to compare with the 43 MPG hybrid option, and the turbo engine gets 2-3 MPG better as well.

  • @revmichaelm
    @revmichaelm 2 роки тому

    Can you get this truck without a sun roof?

  • @ducknorris233
    @ducknorris233 2 роки тому

    Fun fact - the working name for this vehicle was the THREEcson

  • @BarefootVlogger
    @BarefootVlogger 2 роки тому +3

    Just got the same exact vehicle and gonna be cruising all over the state of Florida. Code name: Blue Iguana

  • @danc1197
    @danc1197 Рік тому

    Subaru dropped the ball when they dropped the Baja.

  • @charlesdudek7713
    @charlesdudek7713 2 роки тому

    A little disappointing that a vehicle that costs $42,000 doesn't have comfortable seating. Could definitely be a deal killer.

  • @2blackbikes
    @2blackbikes 2 роки тому +3

    Can't say it enough, you look great, poised, smart, know your facts, well spoken, you check all my boxes I just love your reviews, thanks for all your reviews BTW, and you are a pleasure to look at - very attractive, can I ask you to dinner - 😂😂😂just kidding, not really 😱

  • @billwhiteathome2080
    @billwhiteathome2080 2 роки тому

    Not sure you can call it better than the Maverick. It costs $4k more, doesn't come close to 40mpg, and the bed only holds 660lbs max. It's based off an on-road SUV while the Mav is based off the Ford Bronco, an off-road machine.

  • @19dmanning69
    @19dmanning69 2 роки тому

    The MPG is the same on my full size truck and a fully loaded 2022 Ford Maverick is still less than the Santa Cruz

    • @genesisg7022
      @genesisg7022 2 роки тому +2

      I would never buy a
      Fix
      Or
      Repair
      Daily
      Found
      On
      Road
      Dead

    • @SweatyBearsGaming
      @SweatyBearsGaming 2 роки тому +1

      @@genesisg7022 Have you looked at how reliable Hyundai and Kias have been the last 10 years? Not very.

  • @dans8357
    @dans8357 2 роки тому +8

    Too expensive . I can get a full size truck for that 45k+ price . Maverick priced 10k cheaper when loaded with the extras.

    • @ChristianC-gy1ym
      @ChristianC-gy1ym 2 роки тому +1

      Full size with virtually no options.
      Maverick also less features, less payload, less towing. Better fuel efficiency though. That's about it.
      40 grand is not that expensive considering inflation and the market.

    • @jimji2774
      @jimji2774 2 роки тому +1

      45k you must be in Canada ouch.

  • @geraldsandoval1113
    @geraldsandoval1113 2 роки тому

    Every reviewer keeps talking about the resemblance to the Tucson. I have NO interest in the Tucson nor do I care one little bit about the "Easter Eggs! BFD to both. That said, I am planing on buying one.

  • @hphillips7425
    @hphillips7425 2 роки тому +3

    My wife likes this vehicle and I told her if Scotty says it is good we will get one

    • @ChrisPollard
      @ChrisPollard 2 роки тому +2

      Scotty will never say it's good ... it's not a Toyota. :P

    • @hphillips7425
      @hphillips7425 2 роки тому

      @@ChrisPollard precisely. She stopped talking about it when I told her Scotty had to okay it 😎

  • @kurtp5379
    @kurtp5379 2 роки тому +3

    Where's the spare tire?

  • @lubneejtshiab5948
    @lubneejtshiab5948 2 роки тому +1

    I like Hyundai vehicles because they got the best warranty but 4 cylinder engine pick up truck can't haul anything except sponges.

  • @klasseact6663
    @klasseact6663 2 роки тому +3

    Looks WAAAAAY better than the Maverick❗ Speaking of that, why does Ford have such a problem coming up with NEW names for NEW cars (Mach-e, Lightning and Maverick) I'm pretty sure I read/heard somewhere the T-bird name was trademarked🤔
    Great review Lauren as always👍👍

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 2 роки тому

      Ford wouldn't touch the T-bird name, it's semi-sacred.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 2 роки тому

      @@johnlewinski6359 really...what do you call the disaster that was those Lincoln LS-based turds they produced🤮

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 2 роки тому

      @@johnlewinski6359 T-bird is one of the most bastardized nameplates ever. Look at what they did to the car in 1958-60🤮🤮...then in 1967-70🤮🤮🤮...then in 1980-81🤮🤮...that retro turd🤮🤮🤮

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 2 роки тому

      @@klasseact6663 The 1980 is the most elegant Tbird EVAH!!!
      But seriously, Ford must have reasons for not using Tbird- maybe didn't test well.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 роки тому

    Hey if you want a bigger BED by a utility trailer ! My little Santa Cruz Does everything I need and if I need a bunch stuff all I do is hook up my little 10 ft 4.5 wide utility trailer and pick up anything I want. Paid 750dollars for a brand new Trailer. My Santa Cruz also pulls my 18 ft Satalite Travel Trailer. 3500 lb My F 150 was a good soldier. I could have bought 2 Santa Cruzes for the same price! Da Ha !

  • @freedomstar3814
    @freedomstar3814 2 роки тому +1

    I can do 100 mph on the freeway and it will look like 65 mph with those wheels ..... sweet !

  • @norbertrivera
    @norbertrivera 2 роки тому +1

    Looks great but doesn't look like a pickup.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +1

      True. The brands are calling them compact pickups for urban millennials. 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @Imachowderhead
    @Imachowderhead 2 роки тому +2

    Anything is better than a Ford.

  • @speedfiend925
    @speedfiend925 2 роки тому +1

    Wait Lauren, the driver gets Lumbar support which you are often critical of other manufacturers for not offering this and you only gave seating a 6? I DEMAND A RECOUNT! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому +2

      Lol The seats were not very comfortable and the passenger seat was lacking.

    • @speedfiend925
      @speedfiend925 2 роки тому +1

      @@CarCoachReports Not very comfortable? I might have to rethink my interest in the Santa Cruz. How do they compare to the Maverick? 🤔

    • @gwcrispi
      @gwcrispi 2 роки тому +2

      She's full of it. Seats are very good in the SC.

    • @photo_n_art
      @photo_n_art Рік тому

      Take in account that she is like 5' tall, for people vertically challenged most car seats are not very comfortable 🤷‍♂️
      As far as Maverick comparison, Santa Cruz has better seats and in general it has higher quality interior

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  Рік тому

      For reference, I am 5‘8“ tall

  • @DK-ys2cw
    @DK-ys2cw 2 роки тому

    Sorry I couldn’t finish watching. I can’t support a video that risks the safety of others by mounting a large camera mount in your line of site

  • @hunkydude322
    @hunkydude322 2 роки тому

    El Camino resurrected hmmm.

  • @jimji2774
    @jimji2774 2 роки тому +1

    I have $1,000 deposit on the $70,000 rivian that I won't be pulling the trigger on. Makes the Santa Cruz look inexpensive. Also the rivian is about 10 in wider which makes it a much more difficult vehicle to get around in. I might just get this one instead. My local dealer here in Colorado said he's getting nine vehicles in sometime in September and five are already reserved.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 роки тому

      Interesting, let us know what you decide to buy after your test drive.

  • @MysteriousTony
    @MysteriousTony 2 роки тому +1

    ....is it better?.... not without a V6.....

  • @kanehi
    @kanehi 2 роки тому

    It's illegal in California to hang anything in the front windshield except in the left lower area. Looks like the camera is obstructing the line of sight while driving.

  • @mark5862
    @mark5862 2 роки тому

    Lots of reviews of both these vehicles and when taken in totality there is no clear winner so it comes down to what you like. For me the Maverick wins out in key areas like better mileage, more usable bed, and price. The Maverick kills it in the looks department, I don't care for the wacky Subie Bratt look. I didn't like it when I was a kid and still don't. It's a stretch to call either one fuel efficient in non hybrid form! 19/27 MPG? Get real that is full size truck territory. The Maverick hybrid will win over plenty of small car buyers with its price point and MPG nobody can touch it right now, and its worth pointing out the Maverick hybrid system and transmission is highly regarded. Its a good thing for Hyundai Ford doesn't offer the Maverick in AWD (yet). I test drove a Maverick (lowly XL AWD) and the build quality was impressive in my opinion. I especially liked the hard plastic but durable and attractive interior. Save the polystyrene foam and glued on wood accents for others. My only complaint about the Maverick is its not made in the USA! But heck can you blame them? I'm sure they don't have diversity managers educated in gender studies down there.

  • @dadmezz4024
    @dadmezz4024 2 роки тому +2

    It amazes me that you give good ratings on optional equipment but then would you give it a poor rating for the base model. As usual, customer beware that the manufacture bleeds you dry in America.

    • @mavfan1
      @mavfan1 2 роки тому

      LOL. Look at how Porsche bleeds the whole world dry with their options. America doesn’t come close.

    • @dadmezz4024
      @dadmezz4024 2 роки тому +1

      @@mavfan1 WOW...YOU HAD TO GO TO THAT EXPENSIVE BRAND TO FIND ANOTHER COUNTRIES GOUGER.

  • @thetuninator1885
    @thetuninator1885 2 роки тому

    Santa Fe? I thought this was the Santa Cruz?

  • @TechDude56
    @TechDude56 2 роки тому

    Fugly. Looks like someone ripped the rear roof line off of small SUV and called it a truck. Maverick looks like a truck, not a wreck.

  • @tocreatee3585
    @tocreatee3585 2 роки тому +4

    Maverick is much bigger and better fuel efficiency and better looking.
    and cheaper.

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 2 роки тому +4

      in your dreams...save up your money for a repair fund. you will need it after that short warranty expires.

    • @johnmoore3504
      @johnmoore3504 2 роки тому

      Is 2” much bigger? I don’t think so. Ford hasn’t released fuel economy numbers for the non hybrid yet. But yes the base Maverick is cheaper and gets more MPG.

    • @willie9397
      @willie9397 2 роки тому +1

      @@jrs9264 Hyundai is the one with all the engine problems they better get this right🤔

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 2 роки тому

      FRONT IS HIDEOUS

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 2 роки тому +1

      @@willie9397 not sure where you got that from. ask all the ford 2.0 ecoboost owners whose head gaskets failed. then, ask all the focus owners who sued over cvt failures. and, best of all, hyundai does not use takata grenades, err, airbags.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому

    Its a Hyundai Tuscon with a fast 2.5T. But sorry, I have to go with the Maverick on this one. That grille is hideous. But on the power trains, Hyundai has the edge.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 2 роки тому +5

      this Hyundae looks tons better than the Maverick.

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому +1

      @@hunkydude322 😆

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 2 роки тому +3

      just wait two years, so both chevy and ford can copy hyundai yet again.

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 2 роки тому +1

      @@jrs9264 meh, FoMoCo almost always goes it's own way. But you can count on GM(government motors) essentially cloning Hyundai's new pickemup.

    • @eleanormassaro5195
      @eleanormassaro5195 2 роки тому

      I like the grill!

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars 2 роки тому +1

    We put in a deposit to be early in the queue. Then yesterday went to see the car in a showroom. The Santa Cruz. It is SMALLER than any of these reviewers are revealing, there is NO BACK SEAT. The bed is not big enough for a 4x8 sheet wide or long. And the hype and skinny deliveries are driving dealership markups to absurd levels. Skip this one folks. Get a Honda Ridgeline instead.

  • @bikebudha01
    @bikebudha01 2 роки тому +1

    plz dont ever use the super fast swipy text. it's stupid...