Shure Nexadyne: The Top Choice for Musicians | Full Review

Join Nick Marzock as he delves deep into the groundbreaking Shure Nexadyne Microphone! Nick begins by tracing Shure's storied history and the evolution of their legendary microphones, from the pioneering Unidyne in the 1930s by engineer Ben Bauer to iconic models like the SM58 and SM57 in the 1960s, and the BETA series in the 1990s. This comprehensive review explores how Shure has integrated the best technologies from their previous successes to create the revolutionary Shure Nexadyne Cardioid microphone.
The Nexadyne is engineered to deliver unparalleled sound reproduction from a dynamic microphone, capturing the essence of every note, word, and emotion with clarity and authenticity. Built for durability, it excels under the demanding conditions of live performances while ensuring exceptional sound quality on any stage. This microphone is set to become a vocalist's ultimate companion.
Audio engineers will be eager to experience Nexadyne's meticulous engineering and cutting-edge technology, delivering unmatched tone, clarity, and consistency to every listener in the audience. Don't miss out on discovering the future of live sound with the Shure Nexadyne Microphone!
____________________
Purchase the equipment featured in this video:
Shure NXN8/C Cardioid Nexadyne Mic- tinyurl.com/mr...
Shure NXN8/S Supercardioid Nexadyne Mic- tinyurl.com/ms...
____________________
Visit www.fullcompas... and see why we are the premier provider of professional audio, video, lighting, and backline equipment.
‪@shure‬ #shure #microphone #shuremicrophones #audio #audioequipment #muscians #livesound #music #musician #performer #liveshows

[@paulmapp8306]

Have they fixed the lack of air in their mics? My biggest issue with 58s, 57s and even the KSM8 is the lack of air. Makes them sound rather box'y and shouty to me. Ive always prefered Beyers and Sennheisers (though they go too far often) because of this.

[@brianclebowicz2920]

"Two precisely matched elements" that are acoustically and electrically co-phased begs the question of how Nexadyne performance will drift and degrade over time as the elements shift in their mounts and age over years of use and abuse. It's a complex mic and obviously not inexpensive to produce. While I'm sure that Shure took time with their early prototypes and beta testers to optimise all of this, there is really no way to tell how well Nexadyne will actually perform without a few years use by the community. The Dualdyne has been out for quite a while but has not become THE "go-to" mic for stage, studio, or broadcast, so the in-practice advantages of the Nexadyne may or may not support its price and complexity premium over the SM57/58 and Beta 57/58. Certainly the high price tag will slow broad adoption. Any improvements it yields will need to be dramatic and obvious to make it very popular. I have high hopes - but only time will tell.

[@jjptech]

I was expecting the same drum part compared to for example a 58

[@Earthmanil]

I want to sing in a wide angle but less feedback, so 8C or 8S?

[@fullcompass]

Hello, if you sing at an angle, go with the 8C. It will pick up your voice better. However, both mics have good off-axis rejection.